Long-Term Efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the Prevention of Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| FGIDs | Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders |
| FAP | Functional Abdominal Pain |
| L. reuteri | *Lactobacillus reuteri |
| SCFAs | Short-Chain Fatty Acids |
| BMI | Body Mass Index |
References
- Liss, D.; Paine, P.; Baber, W.; Whitehead, W.E. Functional gastrointestinal disorders in childhood and adolescence: A review of the literature. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Sperber, A.D.; Bangdiwala, S.I.; Drossman, D.A.; Ghoshal, U.C.; Simrén, M.; Tack, J.; Whitehead, W.E.; Dumitrascu, D.L.; Fang, X.; Fukudo, S.; et al. Worldwide prevalence and burden of functional gastrointestinal disorders, results of the Rome Foundation Global Study. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 99–114.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tamburini, S.; Shen, N.; Wu, H.C.; Clemente, J.C. The microbiome in early life: Implications for health outcomes. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, W.G.; Heaton, K.W.; Smyth, G.T.; Shine, P. Irritable bowel syndrome in the community: Prevalence, consultation patterns and relationship to lifestyle variables. Gut 2012, 45, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
- Milani, C.; Duranti, S.; Bottacini, F.; Casey, E.; Turroni, F.; Mahony, J.; Belzer, C.; Delgado Palacio, S.; Arboleya Montes, S.; Mancabelli, L.; et al. The First Microbial Colonizers of the Human Gut: Composition, Activities, and Health Implications of the Infant Gut Microbiota. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00036-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pärtty, A.; Kalliomäki, M.; Salminen, S. Probiotics and the developing brain. Gut Microbes 2015, 6, 154–159. [Google Scholar]
- Indrio, F.; Di Mauro, A.; Riezzo, G.; Cavallo, L.; Francavilla, R. Infantile colic, regurgitation, and constipation: An early traumatic insult in the development of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2015, 174, 841–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dargenio, V.N.; Cristofori, F.; Dargenio, C.; Giordano, P.; Indrio, F.; Celano, G.; Francavilla, R. Use of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in paediatric gastrointestinal disorders: An updated review. Benef. Microbes 2022, 13, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Indrio, F.; Di Mauro, A.; Riezzo, G.; Civardi, E.; Intini, C.; Corvaglia, L.; Ballardini, E.; Bisceglia, M.; Cinquetti, M.; Brazzoduro, E.; et al. Prophylactic use of a probiotic in the prevention of colic, regurgitation, and functional constipation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014, 168, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeevenhooven, J.; Koppen, I.J.; Benninga, M.A. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr. 2017, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Bischoff, S.C.; Barbara, G.; Buurman, W.; Ockhuizen, T.; Schulzke, J.-D.; Serino, M.; Tilg, H.; Watson, A.; Wells, J.M.; Pihlsgård, M.; et al. Intestinal permeability—A new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014, 14, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mayer, E.A.; Tillisch, K. The gut–brain axis in abdominal pain syndromes. Annu. Rev. Med. 2011, 62, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vandenplas, Y.; Benninga, M.; Broekaert, I.; Falconer, J.; Gottrand, F.; Guarino, A.; Lifschitz, C.; Lionetti, P.; Orel, R.; Papadopoulou, A.; et al. Functional gastro-intestinal disorder algorithms focus on early recognition, parental reassurance and nutritional strategies. Acta Paediatr. 2016, 105, 244–252, Erratum in: Acta Paediatr. 2016, 105, 984. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, Y.; Ma, Y.; Luo, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yu, R. Lactobacillus reuteri in digestive system diseases: Focus on clinical trials and mechanisms. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1254198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Silva, Y.P.; Bernardi, A.; Frozza, R.L. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between gut microbiota and the brain. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mogoş, G.F.R.; Manciulea Profir, M.; Enache, R.M.; Pavelescu, L.A.; Popescu Roşu, O.A.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Marinescu, I. Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Marmot, M.; Brunner, E. Cohort Profile: The Whitehall II study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 34, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dobson, A.J.; Hockey, R.; Brown, W.J.; Byles, J.E.; Loxton, D.J.; McLaughlin, D.; Tooth, L.R.; Mishra, G.D. Cohort Profile Update: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 44, 1547–1547f. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Characteristic | L. reuteri (99, 49.5%) | Placebo (101, 50.5%) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female sex, No (%) | Male: 49 (49.5%) Female: 50 (50.5%) | Male: 41 (40.6%) Female: 60 (59.4%) | 0.261 (ns) |
| Breast/Formula feeding, No (%) | Breast: 45 (50%) Formula: 45 (50%) | Breast: 46 (49.5%) Formula: 47 (50.5%) | 1.000 (ns) |
| Diagnosed with FAP, No (%) | 13 (13.8%) | 81 (81.8%) | <0.001 |
| Baseline Characteristic | Responders (n = 200) | Non-Responders (n = 268) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original allocation—L. reuteri DSM 17938, n (%) | 99 (49.5) | 139 (51.9) | 0.57 |
| Original allocation—Placebo, n (%) | 101 (50.5) | 129 (48.1) | |
| Sex—Male, n (%) | 90 (45.0) | 128 (47.8) | 0.60 |
| Sex—Female, n (%) | 110 (55.0) | 140 (52.2) | |
| Infant feeding—Breastfed/partially breastfed, n (%) | 91 (45.5) | 99 (36.9) | <0.001 |
| Infant feeding—Formula-fed, n (%) | 92 (46.0) | 102 (38.1) | |
| Infant feeding—Missing, n (%) | 17 (8.5) | 67 (25.0) | |
| Colic episodes (number), median [IQR] | 2.0 [1.0–3.0] | 3.0 [2.0–4.0] | <0.001 |
| Regurgitation episodes (number), median [IQR] | 2.0 [1.0–3.0] | 2.0 [1.0–3.0] | 0.39 |
| Crying time (minutes/day), median [IQR] | 65.0 [50.0–80.0] | 70.0 [55.0–85.0] | 0.005 |
| Pediatrician visits (number), median [IQR] | 2.0 [1.0–3.0] | 2.0 [1.0–3.0] | 0.46 |
| Emergency department visits (number), median [IQR] | 0.0 [0.0–1.0] | 0.0 [0.0–1.0] | 0.77 |
| Specialist visits (number), median [IQR] | 0.0 [0.0–1.0] | 0.0 [0.0–1.0] | 0.22 |
| Treatment Group | FAP Yes | FAP No | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. reuteri DSM 17938 | 13 | 81 | 94 |
| Placebo | 81 | 18 | 99 |
| Predictor | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. reuteri DSM 17938 (vs. placebo) | 0.04 | 0.01–0.12 | <0.001 |
| Male sex (vs. female) | 0.80 | 0.34–1.87 | 0.60 |
| Formula feeding (vs. breast/partial) | 1.10 | 0.48–2.54 | 0.82 |
| Feeding missing (vs. breast/partial) | 0.90 | 0.22–3.72 | 0.89 |
| Colic episodes (number) | 1.06 | 0.84–1.35 | 0.62 |
| Regurgitation episodes (number) | 1.02 | 0.80–1.30 | 0.87 |
| Crying time (minutes/day) | 1.00 | 0.99–1.02 | 0.40 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Indrio, F.; Di Mauro, A.; Perrone, G.; Greco, A.; Filoni, S.; Napolitano, E.V.; Pecoraro, L. Long-Term Efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the Prevention of Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders. Nutrients 2026, 18, 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18040687
Indrio F, Di Mauro A, Perrone G, Greco A, Filoni S, Napolitano EV, Pecoraro L. Long-Term Efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the Prevention of Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders. Nutrients. 2026; 18(4):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18040687
Chicago/Turabian StyleIndrio, Flavia, Antonio Di Mauro, Giacomo Perrone, Annamaria Greco, Simona Filoni, Enea Vincenzo Napolitano, and Luca Pecoraro. 2026. "Long-Term Efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the Prevention of Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders" Nutrients 18, no. 4: 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18040687
APA StyleIndrio, F., Di Mauro, A., Perrone, G., Greco, A., Filoni, S., Napolitano, E. V., & Pecoraro, L. (2026). Long-Term Efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the Prevention of Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders. Nutrients, 18(4), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18040687

