Next Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Protein Quantity, Source, and Type on Plasma Lipids and Lipoproteins and Their Roles in Dyslipidemia Management in Humans
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Characteristics and Gut Microbiota-Mediated Immunomodulatory Mechanisms of Water- and Alkali-Extracted Polysaccharides from Tuber indicum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ketogenic Diet and Brain Health: Cerebrovascular Mechanisms, Neuroprotection, and Translational Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet and Cognitive Health: A Precision-Nutrition Perspective on Mechanisms, Emerging Evidence, and Future Directions

1
Apollo Health, Burlingame, CA 94010, USA
2
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
3
Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2026, 18(13), 2206; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18132206
Submission received: 23 June 2026 / Accepted: 3 July 2026 / Published: 7 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food as Medicine for Brain and Other Tissues)

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder characterized by impaired glucose metabolism, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, and progressive cognitive decline. Because currently available pharmacological therapies provide only modest symptomatic benefit, nutrition-based interventions are increasingly being explored as complementary strategies for supporting brain metabolism and cognitive resilience. The KetoFLEX 12/3 dietary pattern, developed within the ReCODE (Reversal of Cognitive Decline) program, is a plant-rich, mildly ketogenic nutrition and lifestyle framework that integrates low-glycemic nutrition, time-restricted eating, and personalized metabolic optimization. The diet emphasizes deeply pigmented non-starchy vegetables, extra-virgin olive oil, nuts and seeds, omega-3-rich seafood, and minimally processed foods while limiting refined carbohydrates, sugars, processed foods, and selected grains and dairy products. Emerging mechanistic and clinical evidence suggests that KetoFLEX 12/3 may influence several pathways relevant to AD pathophysiology, including insulin signaling, mitochondrial bioenergetics, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, autophagy, detoxification pathways, and gut–brain axis function. Observational findings from ReCODE-related studies have reported improvements in metabolic parameters, mood-related outcomes, cognitive measures, and brain volumetrics in participants adhering to multimodal precision-medicine interventions incorporating the KetoFLEX principles. Compared with traditional dietary models such as the Mediterranean or MIND diets, KetoFLEX 12/3 places greater emphasis on mild nutritional ketosis, meal timing, and metabolic personalization based on factors such as ApoE genotype and insulin sensitivity. The objective of this Perspective is to examine the mechanistic rationale, emerging evidence, limitations, and future research priorities for KetoFLEX 12/3 as a precision-nutrition framework for cognitive health in AD. Although much of the current evidence remains mechanistic, observational, or derived from multimodal intervention studies, the framework offers a biologically plausible precision-nutrition model that may inform future research and clinical investigation in cognitive decline.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and loss of independence among older adults worldwide [1]. As global populations age, there is increasing urgency to develop strategies that not only delay cognitive decline but also support long-term brain health and resilience [2,3,4,5,6]. Despite decades of research, currently available pharmacological therapies provide modest clinical benefit for many patients, often slowing rather than reversing disease progression [7,8]. Recent biomarker-guided and disease-modifying approaches represent important advances, yet their variable outcomes underscore the complexity and heterogeneity of AD pathophysiology [7,8].
Several factors likely contribute to these therapeutic challenges. AD is characterized by a prolonged presymptomatic phase, whereas treatment is frequently initiated after substantial neuropathological changes have already occurred [9]. Increasing evidence further suggests that AD is not a single uniform disorder but rather a biologically heterogeneous syndrome involving multiple subtypes and interacting pathophysiological drivers [10]. Processes including inflammation, insulin resistance, vascular dysfunction, infections, toxin exposure, trophic insufficiency, and trauma may collectively contribute to disease initiation and progression [2,10,11,12].
While many therapeutic programs have focused primarily on amyloid-β and tau biology, increasing attention is being directed toward metabolic, inflammatory, vascular, and systems-level contributors that may shape disease expression and therapeutic response [7,8]. Against this background, multidomain approaches incorporating nutrition, lifestyle modification, and personalized metabolic optimization are increasingly being explored as complementary strategies for supporting cognitive health and addressing the biological complexity of AD [2,10,11].
Among the emerging approaches being explored within this broader precision-health paradigm is KetoFLEX 12/3, a plant-forward, mildly ketogenic dietary framework developed within the ReCODE (Reversal of Cognitive Decline) program. The framework combines principles of nutritional ketosis, time-restricted eating, and individualized metabolic optimization with the goal of supporting pathways implicated in cognitive decline. Interest in this approach has grown because it attempts to address several biological features commonly observed in AD, including impaired glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and gut–brain axis disturbances [2,10,11,13].
Importantly, KetoFLEX 12/3 is not presented here as a proven stand-alone treatment or replacement for established medical care. Rather, it is discussed as a hypothesis-generating, mechanistically informed precision-nutrition framework that warrants further controlled investigation.

Scope of the Perspective

This article is presented as a Perspective rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. The literature discussed was selected to illustrate mechanistic, clinical, and translational concepts relevant to KetoFLEX 12/3, cognitive health, and AD pathophysiology. Sources included peer-reviewed studies and reviews addressing nutrition and cognition, ketogenic metabolism, Mediterranean and MIND dietary patterns, insulin resistance, ApoE genotype, neuroinflammation, gut–brain signaling, fasting, and precision nutrition. Because this article is not a systematic evidence synthesis, no formal database search strategy, study-selection algorithm, or inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. This limitation is acknowledged to reduce the risk of overstating the comprehensiveness of the evidence base.

2. Rationale for Nutrition-Based Interventions in Alzheimer’s Disease

Recent evidence from multiple research groups highlights substantial biological heterogeneity among individuals with AD, including differences in genetic, epigenetic, biochemical, metabolic, and inflammatory profiles that may influence therapeutic response [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. These observations have stimulated increasing interest in multidomain and personalized approaches that address multiple contributors to disease expression simultaneously that are associated with improved cognitive and metabolic outcomes.
Within this framework, nutrition and lifestyle modification have emerged as important areas of investigation. Dietary patterns, specific food components, and targeted supplementation may influence pathways relevant to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD, including insulin signaling, inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular function, and gut–brain interactions. Given the recognized associations among metabolic dysfunction, gut dysbiosis, obesity, diabetes, and neurodegeneration, dietary strategies that modulate these pathways have become central to contemporary dementia prevention and cognitive-health research [13,20,21,22,23]. Among the dietary models most extensively studied in cognitive aging are the Mediterranean diet, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND), and multidomain lifestyle programs such as the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) [2,11,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. These approaches generally emphasize plant-based foods rich in vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, whole grains, unsaturated fats, and antioxidant-rich food components, and have been associated with better cognitive performance, slower decline, or reduced dementia risk in multiple observational and interventional studies [32,33,34,35].
The FINGER trial provides a notable example of a multidomain strategy incorporating diet, physical activity, cognitive training, social engagement, and vascular risk management [4,5,36]. Although participants were cognitively unimpaired, they were at elevated dementia risk due to vascular factors, and the intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements across executive function, processing speed, and memory measures compared with controls. The DASH diet, for example, emphasizes foods low in sodium and rich in potassium, calcium, and magnesium [37], and adherence to this and related dietary frameworks has been associated with improved cognitive outcomes, likely mediated through vascular risk reduction [32,33,34,35]. Building on these foundations, the MIND diet, specifically designed to target neurodegeneration has demonstrated more consistent associations with preserved cognition and reduced Alzheimer’s disease risk across multiple cohorts [25,35].
Beyond whole dietary patterns, several dietary components commonly emphasized in these approaches including vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and olive oil, have demonstrated independent associations with cognitive health. Bioactive constituents such as unsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants, and dietary flavonoids may further support neuroprotection and attenuate cognitive decline [35,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. These observations have fueled growing interest in precision-nutrition frameworks that tailor dietary interventions to individual metabolic, genetic, and clinical profile. It is important to emphasize that non-ketogenic dietary patterns, particularly Mediterranean and MIND diets, have among the strongest epidemiological and clinical support for cognitive health. These diets are associated with slower cognitive decline and reduced AD risk, likely through vascular, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and metabolic mechanisms. Similarly, extra-virgin olive oil and other unsaturated fat sources that are recommended as part of these structured diets may provide neuroprotective benefits independent of ketosis.
Similarly, KetoFLEX 12/3 represents one such emerging approach. KetoFLEX 12/3 should not be interpreted as superior to the above-mentioned dietary models based on current evidence, but rather as a related precision-nutrition framework that incorporates several Mediterranean-like features while adding meal timing, carbohydrate modulation, and mild nutritional ketosis for selected metabolic contexts. Developed within the ReCODE (Reversal of Cognitive Decline) program, it is a plant-rich, mildly ketogenic nutritional program that includes time-restricted eating and precision personalization based on genetics (e.g., ApoE4 status) and biochemical profiles [2,11,13,47]. The following sections examine the mechanistic rationale, emerging evidence base, and translational considerations underlying this framework in the context of cognitive health and AD.

3. Gut–Brain Axis Vulnerability and Dietary Components That Challenge Intestinal Integrity and Cognitive Resilience

Disturbances of the gut–brain axis including dysbiosis, altered intestinal permeability, and microbial translocation are increasingly being investigated as contributors to neuroinflammation and cognitive decline. Individuals with AD frequently exhibit elevated lipopolysaccharide (LPS), altered zonulin signaling, and shifts in commensal microbial populations, changes that may increase systemic inflammatory burden and have been associated with neuronal dysfunction, impaired synaptic plasticity, and progression of AD pathology [48,49,50,51,52].
Certain dietary components may influence these pathways in susceptible individuals [53,54,55]. Gluten and gliadin, for example, have been shown to modulate intestinal permeability through zonulin-related mechanisms in genetically or immunologically vulnerable populations and may contribute to gastrointestinal or inflammatory responses in selected individuals [56,57,58]. Although whole grains are generally considered health-promoting and non-inflammatory in healthy populations, these effects may become more clinically relevant in individuals exhibiting pre-existing gut vulnerability, metabolic dysfunction, or altered immune responsiveness [59,60,61].
Simple carbohydrates that are processed or ultra-refined foods (sugary beverages, chips, cookies, pastries, cereals, breads, crackers, pastas, and most desserts) may impair gut microbial diversity, promote pro-inflammatory microbiota, disrupt gut barrier integrity, and contribute to metabolic and inflammatory dysregulation. These foods can raise blood glucose levels as rapidly and significantly as added sugar, triggering metabolic disturbances and promoting inflammation, especially when combined with the refined, industrially engineered seed oils common in many processed products [62,63,64,65,66,67]. In contrast, carbohydrate sources that deliver fiber, resistant starch, and minimal processing tend to support microbial diversity and gut health [68,69].
Sugars in all its forms including high-fructose corn syrup, brown rice syrup, barley malt, dextrose, sucrose, fructose and lactose among others are pervasive in ultra-processed foods and contribute to chronic elevations in postprandial glucose, HbA1c, and fasting insulin, making their reduction a high-priority dietary intervention [70,71,72,73,74,75]. Beyond overtly sweetened foods, added sugars are present in most savory processed products thereby complicating glycemic control even in individuals who do not perceive their diet as high in sugar. Excessive sugar exposure promotes insulin resistance, advanced glycation end-product (AGE) formation, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, all of which impair cerebral glucose metabolism and synaptic function and are increasingly implicated in cognitive decline and AD pathophysiology [75,76,77]. Adopting a whole-foods dietary pattern makes it easier to avoid these hidden sources, and many individuals experience a natural reduction in sugar cravings over time [78].
As mentioned above, excess intake of sugars, simple carbohydrates, and refined grains plays a significant role in the global rise of obesity, pre-diabetes, and type 2 diabetes [70,71,72,73,74]. These metabolic disturbances impair the brain’s ability to efficiently utilize glucose, its primary fuel and can also hinder the transition into ketosis which is a critical alternative energy pathway for neuronal function [74,76,79,80]. Research studies have linked insulin resistance and chronic hyperglycemia (which may be accompanied by reactive hypoglyemia) to neurodegeneration, contributing to the concept of AD as ‘type 3 diabetes’, while simultaneously showing that insulin resistance drives systemic inflammation, thereby compounding both metabolic and neurological risk [77,81,82].
In addition, most dairy products, particularly those rich in whey proteins, produce a disproportionately high insulin response relative to their carbohydrate content [83]. While typically well tolerated in metabolically healthy individuals, this insulinogenic effect may complicate metabolic goals in selected populations characterized by insulin resistance or cognitive impairment [84,85]. In addition, dairy-associated immune reactivity has been reported in some patient subgroups, and ApoE4 carriers may demonstrate altered inflammatory or lipid responses to certain saturated fats [86,87,88,89,90,91].
Emerging evidence further suggests that not all dairy exerts identical physiological effects. Conventional dairy containing predominantly A1 β-casein has been associated in some studies with greater gastrointestinal discomfort, inflammatory signaling, oxidative stress, and altered gut microbial patterns, potentially mediated through generation of the peptide β-casomorphin-7 (BCM-7) [86,92,93,94,95]. By contrast, A2 β-casein dairy appears to exhibit improved digestive tolerance and lower inflammatory responses in some populations, with preliminary findings suggesting possible differences in gut–brain interactions and cognitive outcomes [86,92,93,94,95]. Accordingly, within individualized dietary frameworks such as KetoFLEX 12/3, selective reduction in conventional dairy with allowance for small amounts of A2 dairy in those who tolerate it may represent one pragmatic strategy for addressing metabolic and gastrointestinal variability.
Since approximately 50–60% of individuals with AD carry at least one ApoE4 allele, and emerging evidence suggests ApoE4 may influence lipid metabolism, glucose regulation, and inflammatory responses, dietary strategies that reduce refined carbohydrates and support metabolic flexibility have attracted increasing interest in this population [96,97,98,99].

4. Alzheimer’s Disease, Metabolic Dysfunction and Ketosis

A defining feature of AD is impaired cerebral glucose utilization, particularly in temporoparietal (often including posterior cingulate and precuneus) and prefrontal regions. Neuroimaging studies consistently demonstrate reduced cerebral glucose uptake decades before the onset of clinical symptoms. This hypometabolic phenotype is especially pronounced in ApoE4 carriers, in whom reductions in cerebral glucose metabolism have been observed as early as the third decade of life, well before detectable cognitive impairment, suggesting a genetically mediated vulnerability in neuronal energy utilization [100,101]. This early hypometabolism is tightly linked to systemic and cerebral metabolic dysfunction, including insulin resistance, chronic hyperglycemia, impaired mitochondrial function, and neuroinflammation. These overlapping metabolic disturbances not only reduce neuronal glucose availability but also compromise synaptic signaling and accelerate amyloidogenic and tau-related pathways [76,77,102,103,104]. Importantly, ketone uptake and utilization remain relatively intact even in advanced stages of AD, making ketosis a promising metabolic strategy to circumvent defective insulin signaling and support brain energetics. Nutritional interventions aimed at improving glucose regulation and enhancing alternative cerebral fuel availability including low-glycemic diets, time-restricted eating, and ketogenic strategies that increase ketone availability have been associated with improvements in cognition, executive function, and memory in individuals with MCI and early AD. These benefits likely stem from ketones’ ability to enhance mitochondrial efficiency, reduce oxidative stress, modulate inflammation, and restore metabolic flexibility [105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]. Collectively, these findings support continued investigation of dietary approaches such as KetoFLEX 12/3, which seek to address metabolic dysfunction and support neuronal energy metabolism through mild, physiologic nutritional ketosis within a metabolically adaptive framework.

5. KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet-A Precision-Nutrition Model Tailored to Neurodegenerative Vulnerability

The KetoFLEX 12/3 diet integrates ketogenic principles with a precision-medicine framework [2,11,13]. Unlike population-level dietary programs such as FINGER, DASH, or MIND, KetoFLEX 12/3 applies a precision medicine framework to individualize interventions across seven foundational lifestyle domains, with the goal of supporting neuroplasticity, restoring systemic balance, and improving cognitive function (Figure 1) [2,11,13].
Since AD is preceded and accompanied by the brain’s inability to effectively use glucose as fuel the “keto” in KetoFLEX 12/3 refers to ketosis, the process by which the body uses dietary fat and breaks down stored body fat to use as fuel. The “flex” refers to metabolic flexibility, the capacity to efficiently transition between glucose-and fat-derived fuels in response to nutritional and energetic demands [113,116]. The therapeutic intent of KetoFLEX 12/3 is therefore not the promotion of chronic ketosis, but rather the restoration of insulin sensitivity and metabolic adaptability, enabling the brain to better utilize glucose while also accessing ketones as a complementary fuel source. Within the KetoFLEX framework, dietary composition, meal timing, and physical activity are intended to periodically promote mild physiological ketosis, typically reflected by measurable increases in circulating ketone bodies, while maintaining overall metabolic flexibility and nutritional adequacy [109,117,118].
The rationale for this approach derives from evidence suggesting that carbohydrate tolerance, glycemic regulation, and metabolic flexibility may differ substantially across populations. Although grains are widely recognized as nutrient-dense foods with established health benefits in general populations, their carbohydrate content may contribute to post-prandial hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, glycotoxicity, impaired cerebral glucose utilization, gut permeability, and dysbiosis in selected individuals characterized by insulin resistance, impaired glucose metabolism, or ApoE4-associated metabolic sensitivity [102,112,119,120]. Within this context, KetoFLEX 12/3 is structured to emphasize glycemic stability, mild nutritional ketosis, and individualized metabolic responsiveness [109,117,118].
KetoFLEX 12/3 may therefore be viewed as a mechanistically informed precision-nutrition approach. Its dietary structure is designed to support several interconnected goals: enhancing ketone availability, moderating glycemic variability and insulin exposure, supporting gut barrier integrity, and attenuating pathways linked to neuroinflammation and metabolic dysfunction [121,122,123,124,125]. The selective limitation of grains, legumes, and some dairy products is framed within this review not as a universal recommendation, but as a personalized nutritional strategy that may be relevant for specific metabolic or neurobiological contexts encountered in individuals with MCI or early AD [126,127,128,129,130,131].
Thus, KetoFLEX 12/3 may be viewed as complementary to, rather than competitive with, Mediterranean and MIND dietary frameworks. All three approaches emphasize nutrient density, plant-rich eating patterns, and reduction in ultra-processed foods, with KetoFLEX 12/3 placing additional emphasis on meal timing, metabolic flexibility, and individualized adaptation based on metabolic and genetic characteristics.

5.1. Metabolic Dysfunction as an Early Driver of AD and the KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet

Neuroimaging and metabolomic studies consistently show that cerebral glucose hypometabolism precedes clinical symptoms of AD by years to decades. This “type 3 diabetes” phenotype reflects brain insulin resistance and impaired mitochondrial oxidation, ultimately contributing to energetic failure and synaptic dysfunction [77,132,133]. Restoring metabolic flexibility, the ability to efficiently utilize glucose, fatty acids, or ketones, is therefore essential for maintaining cognitive function [122,126,134,135].
The KetoFLEX 12/3 dietary pattern is designed to promote mild nutritional ketosis and may increase circulating β-hydroxybutyrate, a preferred neuronal substrate that bypasses impaired glucose pathways and enhances mitochondrial ATP production [136,137,138]. Beyond serving as an alternative fuel, ketones also function as signaling molecules: they inhibit histone deacetylases, promote expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and reduce neuroinflammation [139,140]. These combined effects support synaptic plasticity, mitochondrial resilience, and neuronal survival, core domains compromised early in AD pathogenesis (Figure 1).

5.2. Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Vascular Dysfunction

Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress accelerate neuronal injury through activation of NF-κB signaling, microglial overactivation, and vascular endothelial dysfunction [141,142,143]. Dietary patterns rich in polyphenols, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants, particularly extra-virgin olive oil, leafy greens, mushrooms, herbs, and spices can attenuate these inflammatory and oxidative processes [144,145,146]. Although Mediterranean and MIND dietary patterns are consistently associated with improvements in metabolic health, they do not specifically emphasize nutritional ketosis or deliberate promotion of metabolic flexibility as therapeutic targets, particularly in individuals with insulin resistance or ApoE4-associated vulnerability. KetoFLEX 12/3 was developed to address this gap by restoring metabolic flexibility through strategic carbohydrate modulation, enabling regular periods of physiologic endogenous ketosis while maintaining the anti-inflammatory benefits of plant-based nutrition [121,147,148,149,150].

5.3. Fasting and Circadian Metabolism

Intermittent fasting and time-restricted feeding support autophagy, promote mitochondrial biogenesis, and improve insulin sensitivity, mechanisms essential for neuronal maintenance and metabolic health [151,152,153]. The “12/3” structure of KetoFLEX which requires fasting for ≥12 h daily with the final meal consumed ≥3 h before bedtime, leverages circadian rhythms to reduce post-prandial glycemia, enhance sleep quality, and synchronize metabolic and neurophysiological processes [154]. Human studies demonstrate that even modest fasting windows can elevate ketone levels, reduce systemic inflammation, and improve cognitive performance [152,155,156]. In selected individuals particularly ApoE4 carriers, longer fasting intervals may be potentially beneficial, reflecting enhanced reliance on lipid- and ketone-based fuel utilization [105,121]. Such approaches are implemented cautiously and individualized within the KetoFLEX framework, with attention to body composition, strength, glycemic control, and overall physiologic resilience.

6. Core Food Components of the KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet

Cognition-supportive dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean, FINGER, DASH, and MIND diets consistently promote whole grains and permit low to moderate dairy intake, while limiting refined or simple carbohydrates [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. This stands in contrast to the KetoFLEX 12/3 therapeutic framework, which replaces grains with non-starchy, deeply pigmented plant foods with a low glycemic impact. These foods span diverse colors and botanical families, maximizing exposure to polyphenols, carotenoids, vitamins, minerals, and other bioactive compounds that support metabolic, vascular, and cognitive resilience [25,157,158].

6.1. Vegetables and Fruits

Leafy green vegetables including kale, spinach, chard, arugula, beet greens, collards, and watercress form the foundation of the plant component of KetoFLEX 12/3. These foods provide folate, vitamin K, magnesium, and nitrates, and are associated with homocysteine reduction, improved endothelial function, and nitric oxide-mediated vascular support relevant to brain health [25,159,160,161,162].
Cruciferous vegetables (e.g., broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, bok choy, rapini), together with allium vegetables (garlic, onions, leeks, shallots), are emphasized for their glucosinolate and organosulfur-derived bioactive compounds. Preparation methods involving chopping and holding prior to cooking and gentle heat exposure help preserve myrosinase activity and support sulforaphane formation [163,164,165,166].
Fruit intake within KetoFLEX 12/3 is selective, favoring low-glycemic, high-phytonutrient options. Wild or minimally sweet berries including blueberries, strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, cranberries, currants, bilberries, and pomegranate are prioritized for their polyphenolic density and neuroprotective potential [167,168,169]. Tart cherries are associated with improved metabolic regulation, reduced oxidative stress, and memory-related outcomes [170,171], while citrus fruits such as lemons and limes are included for flavor and vitamin C content with minimal glycemic burden [172]. In contrast, modern selectively bred, high-sugar fruits are deemphasized, and tropical fruits with high glycemic load are less preferred. Small quantities of low-glycemic unripe fruits are considered compatible in metabolically favorable contexts [173,174,175].
For clarity, while foods such as tomatoes, olives and avocados are botanically classified as fruits, they are mentioned within this category based on their low glycemic impact, metabolic effects and culinary use. Avocados are included as multifunctional foods supplying monounsaturated fatty acids, fiber, potassium, and magnesium, while also facilitating nutritional ketosis [154,162,176]. Olives and olive-derived products provide monounsaturated fats and polyphenols with anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties with brine-fermented varieties additionally contributing to microbial diversity [177,178]. Tomatoes contribute flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and carotenoids including lycopene and β-carotene, whose bioavailability is enhanced when consumed with dietary fat [161,179,180].
Culinary mushrooms, particularly Hericium erinaceus (Lion’s Mane), though taxonomically distinct from plants, are included within this category based on their functional nutritional properties. Mushrooms provide a range of bioactive compounds including β-glucans, ergothioneine, erinacines, hericenones, selenium, and other polysaccharides with documented antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and neuroprotective potential [181,182]. In vivo studies suggest that supplementation with medicinal and culinary mushrooms (e.g., Lion’s Mane, reishi, cordyceps) may support neurotrophic signaling and cognitive function. In addition, observational studies of commonly consumed mushroom varieties have reported associations with a reduced risk of cognitive impairment in aging populations [181,182,183,184].

6.2. Herbs, Spices, Teas, and Coffee

Spices, long used as culinary agents, are increasingly recognized for their neuroprotective potential in aging and dementia. Bioactive compounds derived from commonly used spices including turmeric, members of the pepper family, saffron, ginger and cinnamon, modulate multiple pathological processes relevant to Alzheimer’s disease by suppressing neuroinflammation, reducing oxidative stress, inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity, and limiting amyloid-β and tau aggregation. Several also influence mitochondrial function, synaptic plasticity, and intracellular signaling pathways such as NF-κB, Nrf2, and MAPK that govern neuronal survival [185,186,187].
Teas, particularly green tea and matcha, are valued for epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a flavanol with demonstrated neuroprotective and metabolic effects [188,189,190]. Brewing techniques that minimize excessive heat and microplastic exposure are favored [191,192].
Coffee derived from Coffea arabica is recognized as a major dietary source of antioxidants with potential metabolic and cognitive relevance [193,194,195]. While a variety of coffee forms are increasingly consumed, preparation methods can influence polyphenol content, diterpene levels, and glycemic impact [196,197]. The potential cognitive and metabolic benefits of coffee are primarily attributed to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory constituents [198]. Within the KetoFLEX framework, coffee is best consumed without added sugars or sweetened creamers to avoid counteracting metabolic benefits.

6.3. Healthy Fats and Oils

Healthy fats serve as metabolic and structural cornerstones of the KetoFLEX 12/3 pattern, supporting nutritional ketosis, mitochondrial function, neuronal membranes, and myelin integrity [74,102]. The framework distinguishes monounsaturated fats (e.g., avocados, olives, olive oil, nuts), polyunsaturated fats including omega-3 fatty acids from marine and plant sources and omega-6 fatty acids from whole foods and saturated fats derived primarily from minimally processed sources [199,200,201].
Industrial trans fats and refined seed oils are excluded because of their adverse effects on lipid metabolism, inflammation, and cardiometabolic risk. KetoFLEX 12/3 aims to correct the excess omega-6 exposure typical of Western dietary patterns by reducing industrial seed oils and increasing marine- and plant-derived omega-3 intake [202,203,204].
High-polyphenol extra-virgin olive oil is a central component of the KetoFLEX 12/3 framework because its monounsaturated fat and polyphenol profile has been associated with improved insulin sensitivity, healthier lipid metabolism, reduced inflammation, and activation of neuroprotective pathways relevant to mitochondrial function, autophagy, amyloid and tau biology, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling [205,206,207].

6.4. Nuts and Seeds

Nuts and seeds are incorporated as nutrient-dense sources of unsaturated fats, dietary fiber, minerals, and diverse phytonutrients [208]. In individuals with ApoE4-associated lipid sensitivity or cholesterol hyperabsorption, greater emphasis is placed on monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) rather than saturated fats [208,209,210]. Accordingly, the KetoFLEX dietary patterns favor walnuts, macadamias, hazelnuts, pecans, pistachios, almonds, flax, and chia seeds. Preparation techniques such as soaking and sprouting have been shown to reduce antinutritional factors including phytates, lectins, and enzyme inhibitors, thereby improving mineral bioavailability and digestive tolerance [211,212,213]. Peanuts are relatively de-emphasized because of concerns regarding susceptibility to mold contamination and aflatoxin exposure [214]. Flax and chia seeds are particularly rich in plant-derived omega-3 fatty acids (α-linolenic acid, ALA), macadamia nuts provide predominantly MUFAs, walnuts are enriched in PUFAs, and almonds, hazelnuts, pistachios, and pecans offer favorable blends of MUFA and PUFA associated with cardiometabolic and cognitive health [215,216].

6.5. Prebiotics, Probiotics and Resistant Starch

Within KetoFLEX 12/3, targeted use of prebiotics, probiotics, and resistant starch is encouraged to support microbial diversity, strengthen gut barrier function, and favorably influence metabolic and neuroinflammatory pathways. Prebiotic fibers are non-digestible carbohydrates selectively fermented by beneficial colonic bacteria that are recognized for their role in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, particularly butyrate, which supports gut barrier integrity and may contribute indirectly to ketone availability. Many non-starchy vegetables, roots, and tubers provide these substrates [217,218,219].
Probiotic foods derived from traditional fermentation are included as natural sources of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and, in the case of natto, Bacillus subtilis. Preference is given to non-pasteurized, non-vinegar-preserved, and low-sugar preparations, with recognition that individual tolerance may vary, particularly in those with increased gut permeability. Short-term probiotic supplementation is viewed as adjunctive, with long-term emphasis placed on food-based microbial exposure [220,221,222].
Resistant starch represents a distinct class of carbohydrates that behaves physiologically like fiber, escaping small intestinal digestion and undergoing fermentation in the colon. Resulting SCFAs are associated with improved insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism, satiety signaling, fat oxidation, and gut health. However, because it can increase glucose exposure in some individuals, it is typically introduced in moderation and after insulin resistance has improved. Sources include legumes (when appropriately prepared), tubers such as colored potatoes when cooked and cooled, and certain unripe fruits such as green plantains or bananas [223,224,225,226].
In addition to resistant starch and fermented foods, polyphenol-rich foods including berries, olive oil, herbs, spices, tea, cocoa, and colorful vegetables may favorably influence microbial diversity and short-chain fatty acid production. These effects have been associated with enhanced gut barrier integrity, reduced systemic inflammation, and modulation of gut-derived signaling pathways increasingly implicated in neurodegenerative disorders.

6.6. Meat, Seafood and Poultry

KetoFLEX distinguishes minimally processed, pasture-raised or wild-sourced animal foods from industrially produced animal products. Grass-fed, pasture-raised, hormone and antibiotic-free animal foods are preferred to reduce exposure to environmental toxins stored in adipose tissue [227,228]. Red meat intake is moderated, in part due to Neu5Gc content, while venison is avoided because of concerns related to chronic wasting disease [229,230,231].
Protein intake within KetoFLEX 12/3 is considered through a metabolic and longevity paradigm, with emphasis on achieving nutritional adequacy while avoiding chronic overconsumption. In selected metabolic contexts, short periods of modest protein reduction may be incorporated to support pathways related to autophagy and metabolic flexibility, while maintaining muscle mass and overall nutritional sufficiency. Plant foods are recognized as important contributors to total protein intake, and periodic moderation of animal protein consumption is viewed as compatible with long-term metabolic, healthy-aging, and cognitive objectives [232,233,234].
Seafood, particularly wild-caught cold-water species summarized by the “SMASH” acronym (salmon, mackerel, anchovies, sardines, herring), is prioritized for its EPA/DHA content and relatively low mercury burden. Carefully certified farmed seafood is considered acceptable when appropriately vetted. Shellfish and mollusks are included when sourced from low-contaminant environments [74,235].
For poultry, KetoFLEX 12/3 conceptually favors truly pastured birds with access to forage and minimal reliance on supplemental grain. The framework highlights limitations of common labeling terms such as “cage-free” or “free-range,” noting that even organic poultry typically receives grain-based feed. Fully pastured poultry, when available, provides a more favorable omega-3 profile [203]. Pasture-raised eggs are emphasized for their content of omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin B12, folate, fat-soluble vitamins, and choline, with egg yolks supporting synaptic membrane integrity and neurotransmission [236,237].

6.7. Sweeteners and Cocoa Flavanols

A core objective of KetoFLEX 12/3 is recalibration of sweet taste with a reduced reliance on sweetness as a marker of metabolic adaptation away from ultra-processed foods [238,239]. Non-nutritive sweeteners are generally minimized, as even non-caloric sweetness may influence insulin signaling and the gut microbiome [66,240,241,242]. When used selectively, certain low-glycemic sweeteners such as pure stevia, monk fruit extract or allulose are considered more compatible [243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252].
In metabolically flexible individuals, limited use of natural sweeteners such as honey or maple syrup may be incorporated in nutritionally dense meal contexts. Sugar alcohols are generally discouraged due to gastrointestinal intolerance and potential microbiome effects [253,254,255].
Cocoa flavanols are of interest because of reported vascular and neurocognitive effects; however, concerns regarding sugar content and heavy metal contamination necessitate careful selection. High-cacao dark chocolate with minimal sugar and verified low levels of cadmium and lead is preferred and consumed sparingly [256,257,258,259,260].

7. Precision and Personalization

Given proposed models of AD heterogeneity including Inflammatory (type 1), Atrophic (type 2), Glycotoxic (type 1.5), Toxic (type 3), Vascular (type 4) and Traumatic (type 5), a uniform dietary strategy may not adequately address the biological variability observed across individuals with cognitive decline [2,15,77,261]. The KetoFLEX 12/3 framework is designed to be adaptable, allowing dietary composition, fasting duration, and food selection to be adjusted according to variables such as ApoE genotype, body composition, insulin sensitivity, gastrointestinal status, hormonal milieu, and coexisting clinical conditions. For example, individuals with insulin resistance may prioritize glycemic reduction, carbohydrate modulation, and fasting optimization to improve metabolic flexibility. In ApoE4 carriers, some implementations of KetoFLEX 12/3 place greater emphasis on polyphenol-rich unsaturated fats, non-starchy plant foods, and moderation of saturated fat exposure; however, these adaptations are based on emerging evidence regarding ApoE-associated differences in lipid metabolism, glucose regulation, and inflammatory responses and should be regarded as individualized considerations rather than established clinical recommendations. Longer fasting windows (up to 16 h) may be considered only cautiously and in selected individuals, with attention to age, body composition, frailty risk, glycemic stability, sleep, medication use, and overall clinical context. Rather than advocating a uniform dietary prescription, this approach reflects the broader premise that nutritional requirements and therapeutic responsiveness may differ across biologically heterogeneous AD populations [97,121,152,262].
Although the term KetoFLEX 12/3 was not explicitly used in several earlier precision-medicine studies of cognitive decline, many of these interventions incorporated core elements that later became formalized within the framework, including low-glycemic nutrition, mild nutritional ketosis, time-restricted eating, metabolic optimization, and individualized treatment strategies. Improvements reported in these multimodal studies provided part of the clinical rationale for the development and refinement of KetoFLEX 12/3 [2,10,11,13,47,263]. Thus, KetoFLEX 12/3 evolved from clinical precision-medicine programs that had already demonstrated feasibility and cognitive benefit, rather than being derived solely from theoretical or mechanistic considerations.
Nevertheless, the independent contribution of the dietary framework remains difficult to isolate within multifactorial programs, underscoring the need for future biomarker-guided randomized controlled trials specifically evaluating KetoFLEX 12/3. Accordingly, KetoFLEX 12/3 may be viewed as an emerging precision-nutrition framework and a useful conceptual model for future investigations examining personalized dietary strategies in cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease [97,121,152,262].
However, practical implementation remains an important consideration. Older adults may face challenges related to meal timing, dietary preferences, medication schedules, frailty, caregiver support, and long-term adherence. Accordingly, KetoFLEX 12/3 is intended to be implemented progressively and individualized according to nutritional status, body composition, comorbidities, and overall clinical context rather than applied as a rigid dietary prescription.

8. Conclusions

Alzheimer’s disease is increasingly recognized as a biologically heterogeneous disorder involving disturbances in metabolism, inflammation, vascular function, mitochondrial energetics, and gut–brain signaling. Within this evolving landscape, nutrition-based interventions are receiving growing attention as complementary components of multidomain strategies for cognitive health. KetoFLEX 12/3 represents an emerging precision-nutrition framework that combines plant-forward, mildly ketogenic nutrition, meal timing, and individualized metabolic tailoring to address pathways relevant to cerebral glucose dysregulation, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic resilience. Rather than functioning as a universal dietary prescription, the framework is intended to accommodate biological variability across individuals with cognitive decline.
At present, evidence specific to KetoFLEX 12/3 remains limited and derives largely from mechanistic studies, observational findings, multimodal intervention programs, and related ketogenic or metabolic literature rather than large randomized trials evaluating the dietary framework in isolation. While observational studies, multimodal intervention programs, and emerging translational data provide encouraging signals, important questions remain regarding long-term adherence, implementation feasibility, biomarker-guided personalization, and validation through larger controlled studies. Future investigations incorporating metabolic phenotyping, ApoE genotype stratification, gut–brain biomarkers, and precision-nutrition trial designs will be essential for clarifying which individuals are most likely to benefit from individualized dietary strategies in Alzheimer’s disease and related cognitive disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G., A.L.B. and R.V.R.; Data curation, K.G.S. and R.V.R.; original draft preparation and writing, K.G.S., J.G., A.L.B. and R.V.R.; reviewing and editing, J.G., A.L.B., C.C., S.O., L.K., D.E.B. and R.V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Molly Susag for assistance with the manuscript preparation, Madison Carbone for figure design and development, and the health coaches of the Apollo Health ReCODE program for their support of participating individuals, which provides valuable real-world context for precision lifestyle interventions.

Conflicts of Interest

This manuscript is not under consideration by another journal, nor has it been published. D.E.B. is a consultant for Apollo Health and Life Seasons, neither of which was involved in this study nor had any access to the study data. Other authors (J.G., A.L.B., C.C., S.O., L.K., and R.V.R.) are affiliated with Apollo Health which implements the ReCODE program and the KetoFLEX 12/3 dietary framework developed by D.E.B. and discussed in this Perspective. All the authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest by presenting KetoFLEX 12/3 as a hypothesis-generating precision-nutrition framework, explicitly acknowledging limitations in the current evidence base, and avoiding claims of proven efficacy or superiority over established dietary approaches.

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Association. 2024 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2024, 20, 3708–3821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Toups, K.; Hathaway, A.; Gordon, D.; Chung, H.; Raji, C.; Boyd, A.; Hill, B.D.; Hausman-Cohen, S.; Attarha, M.; Chwa, W.J.; et al. Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease: Successful Pilot Project. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2022, 88, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. James, B.D.; Leurgans, S.E.; Hebert, L.E.; Scherr, P.A.; Yaffe, K.; Bennett, D.A. Contribution of Alzheimer disease to mortality in the United States. Neurology 2014, 82, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Ngandu, T.; Lehtisalo, J.; Solomon, A.; Levalahti, E.; Ahtiluoto, S.; Antikainen, R.; Backman, L.; Hanninen, T.; Jula, A.; Laatikainen, T.; et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 2255–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Kivipelto, M.; Solomon, A.; Ahtiluoto, S.; Ngandu, T.; Lehtisalo, J.; Antikainen, R.; Backman, L.; Hanninen, T.; Jula, A.; Laatikainen, T.; et al. The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER): Study design and progress. Alzheimers Dement. 2013, 9, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Isaacson, R.S.; Hristov, H.; Saif, N.; Hackett, K.; Hendrix, S.; Melendez, J.; Safdieh, J.; Fink, M.; Thambisetty, M.; Sadek, G.; et al. Individualized clinical management of patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2019, 15, 1588–1602. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Yiannopoulou, K.G.; Anastasiou, A.I.; Zachariou, V.; Pelidou, S.H. Reasons for Failed Trials of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer Disease and Their Contribution in Recent Research. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Mehta, D.; Jackson, R.; Paul, G.; Shi, J.; Sabbagh, M. Why do trials for Alzheimer’s disease drugs keep failing? A discontinued drug perspective for 2010-2015. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2017, 26, 735–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Dubois, B.; Hampel, H.; Feldman, H.H.; Scheltens, P.; Aisen, P.; Andrieu, S.; Bakardjian, H.; Benali, H.; Bertram, L.; Blennow, K.; et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement. 2016, 12, 292–323. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Bredesen, D.E.; Amos, E.C.; Canick, J.; Ackerley, M.; Raji, C.; Fiala, M.; Ahdidan, J. Reversal of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging 2016, 8, 1250–1258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Rao, R.V.; Kumar, S.; Gregory, J.; Coward, C.; Okada, S.; Lipa, W.; Kelly, L.; Bredesen, D.E. ReCODE: A Personalized, Targeted, Multi-Factorial Therapeutic Program for Reversal of Cognitive Decline. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1348–1356. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Seto, M.; Weiner, R.L.; Dumitrescu, L.; Hohman, T.J. Protective genes and pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: Moving towards precision interventions. Mol. Neurodegener. 2021, 16, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Sandison, H.; Callan, N.G.L.; Rao, R.V.; Phipps, J.; Bradley, R. Observed Improvement in Cognition During a Personalized Lifestyle Intervention in People with Cognitive Decline. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2023, 94, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Chung, J.; Sahelijo, N.; Maruyama, T.; Hu, J.; Panitch, R.; Xia, W.; Mez, J.; Stein, T.D.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I.; Saykin, A.J.; et al. Alzheimer’s disease heterogeneity explained by polygenic risk scores derived from brain transcriptomic profiles. Alzheimers Dement. 2023, 19, 5173–5184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Bredesen, D.E.; Toups, K.; Hathaway, A.; Gordon, D.; Chung, H.; Raji, C.; Boyd, A.; Hill, B.D.; Hausman-Cohen, S.; Attarha, M.; et al. Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease: Rationale and Implications. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2023, 96, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Duara, R.; Barker, W. Heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Progression Rates: Implications for Therapeutic Trials. Neurother. J. Am. Soc. Exp. Neurother. 2022, 19, 8–25. [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnold, S.E.; Hyman, B.T.; Betensky, R.A.; Dodge, H.H. Pathways to personalized medicine-Embracing heterogeneity for progress in clinical therapeutics research in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2024, 20, 7384–7394. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Soldevila-Domenech, N.; Boronat, A.; Langohr, K.; de la Torre, R. N-of-1 Clinical Trials in Nutritional Interventions Directed at Improving Cognitive Function. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Schechter, G.; Azad, G.K.; Rao, R.; McKeany, A.; Matulaitis, M.; Kalos, D.M.; Kennedy, B.K. A Comprehensive, Multi-Modal Strategy to Mitigate Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Factors Improves Aspects of Metabolism and Offsets Cognitive Decline in Individuals with Cognitive Impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Rep. 2020, 4, 223–230. [Google Scholar]
  20. Talbot, K.; Wang, H.Y.; Kazi, H.; Han, L.Y.; Bakshi, K.P.; Stucky, A.; Fuino, R.L.; Kawaguchi, K.R.; Samoyedny, A.J.; Wilson, R.S.; et al. Demonstrated brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer’s disease patients is associated with IGF-1 resistance, IRS-1 dysregulation, and cognitive decline. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1316–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Darweesh, S.K.L.; Wolters, F.J.; Ikram, M.A.; de Wolf, F.; Bos, D.; Hofman, A. Inflammatory markers and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2018, 14, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Pugazhenthi, S.; Qin, L.; Reddy, P.H. Common neurodegenerative pathways in obesity, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Gutierrez, L.; Folch, A.; Rojas, M.; Cantero, J.L.; Atienza, M.; Folch, J.; Camins, A.; Ruiz, A.; Papandreou, C.; Bullo, M. Effects of Nutrition on Cognitive Function in Adults with or without Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Feart, C.; Samieri, C.; Rondeau, V.; Amieva, H.; Portet, F.; Dartigues, J.F.; Scarmeas, N.; Barberger-Gateau, P. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet, cognitive decline, and risk of dementia. JAMA 2009, 302, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Morris, M.C.; Tangney, C.C.; Wang, Y.; Sacks, F.M.; Barnes, L.L.; Bennett, D.A.; Aggarwal, N.T. MIND diet slows cognitive decline with aging. Alzheimers Dement. 2015, 11, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, X.; Maguire, B.; Brodaty, H.; O’Leary, F. Dietary Patterns and Cognitive Health in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019, 67, 583–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Vinciguerra, F.; Graziano, M.; Hagnas, M.; Frittitta, L.; Tumminia, A. Influence of the Mediterranean and Ketogenic Diets on Cognitive Status and Decline: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Blumenthal, J.A.; Smith, P.J.; Mabe, S.; Hinderliter, A.; Lin, P.H.; Liao, L.; Welsh-Bohmer, K.A.; Browndyke, J.N.; Kraus, W.E.; Doraiswamy, P.M.; et al. Lifestyle and neurocognition in older adults with cognitive impairments: A randomized trial. Neurology 2019, 92, e212–e223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Blumenthal, J.A.; Smith, P.J.; Mabe, S.; Hinderliter, A.; Welsh-Bohmer, K.; Browndyke, J.N.; Doraiswamy, P.M.; Lin, P.H.; Kraus, W.E.; Burke, J.R.; et al. Longer Term Effects of Diet and Exercise on Neurocognition: 1-Year Follow-up of the ENLIGHTEN Trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020, 68, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Smith, P.J.; Mabe, S.; Sherwood, A.; Babyak, M.A.; Doraiswamy, P.M.; Welsh-Bohmer, K.A.; Kraus, W.; Burke, J.; Hinderliter, A.; Blumenthal, J.A. Association Between Insulin Resistance, Plasma Leptin, and Neurocognition in Vascular Cognitive Impairment. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019, 71, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, X.; Morris, M.C.; Dhana, K.; Ventrelle, J.; Johnson, K.; Bishop, L.; Hollings, C.S.; Boulin, A.; Laranjo, N.; Stubbs, B.J.; et al. Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) study: Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of a randomized control trial of the MIND diet on cognitive decline. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2021, 102, 106270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Feart, C.; Samieri, C.; Barberger-Gateau, P. Mediterranean diet and cognitive function in older adults. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2010, 13, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Berendsen, A.A.; Kang, J.H.; van de Rest, O.; Jankovic, N.; Kampman, E.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Franco, O.H.; Ikram, M.A.; Pikhart, H.; Nilsson, L.M.; et al. Association of Adherence to a Healthy Diet with Cognitive Decline in European and American Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis within the CHANCES Consortium. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2017, 43, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Berendsen, A.A.M.; Kang, J.H.; van de Rest, O.; Feskens, E.J.M.; de Groot, L.; Grodstein, F. The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Diet, Cognitive Function, and Cognitive Decline in American Older Women. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2017, 18, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. van den Brink, A.C.; Brouwer-Brolsma, E.M.; Berendsen, A.A.M.; van de Rest, O. The Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) Diets Are Associated with Less Cognitive Decline and a Lower Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease-A Review. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 1040–1065. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Lehtisalo, J.; Levalahti, E.; Lindstrom, J.; Hanninen, T.; Paajanen, T.; Peltonen, M.; Antikainen, R.; Laatikainen, T.; Strandberg, T.; Soininen, H.; et al. Dietary changes and cognition over 2 years within a multidomain intervention trial-The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER). Alzheimers Dement. 2019, 15, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Morris, M.C.; Tangney, C.C.; Wang, Y.; Sacks, F.M.; Bennett, D.A.; Aggarwal, N.T. MIND diet associated with reduced incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015, 11, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Duplantier, S.C.; Gardner, C.D. A Critical Review of the Study of Neuroprotective Diets to Reduce Cognitive Decline. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Mottaghi, T.; Amirabdollahian, F.; Haghighatdoost, F. Fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 1336–1344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Theodore, L.E.; Kellow, N.J.; McNeil, E.A.; Close, E.O.; Coad, E.G.; Cardoso, B.R. Nut Consumption for Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 777–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Roman, G.C.; Jackson, R.E.; Reis, J.; Roman, A.N.; Toledo, J.B.; Toledo, E. Extra-virgin olive oil for potential prevention of Alzheimer disease. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 175, 705–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Omar, S.H. Mediterranean and MIND Diets Containing Olive Biophenols Reduces the Prevalence of Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Solfrizzi, V.; Colacicco, A.M.; D’Introno, A.; Capurso, C.; Torres, F.; Rizzo, C.; Capurso, A.; Panza, F. Dietary intake of unsaturated fatty acids and age-related cognitive decline: A 8.5-year follow-up of the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Neurobiol. Aging 2006, 27, 1694–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Letenneur, L.; Proust-Lima, C.; Le Gouge, A.; Dartigues, J.F.; Barberger-Gateau, P. Flavonoid intake and cognitive decline over a 10-year period. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 165, 1364–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Desideri, G.; Kwik-Uribe, C.; Grassi, D.; Necozione, S.; Ghiadoni, L.; Mastroiacovo, D.; Raffaele, A.; Ferri, L.; Bocale, R.; Lechiara, M.C.; et al. Benefits in cognitive function, blood pressure, and insulin resistance through cocoa flavanol consumption in elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment: The Cocoa, Cognition, and Aging (CoCoA) study. Hypertension 2012, 60, 794–801. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Grassi, D.; Desideri, G.; Necozione, S.; Ruggieri, F.; Blumberg, J.B.; Stornello, M.; Ferri, C. Protective effects of flavanol-rich dark chocolate on endothelial function and wave reflection during acute hyperglycemia. Hypertension 2012, 60, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Toups, K.; Tanio, C.P.; Hathaway, A.; Bergman, N.; Burke, K.; Haase, D.; Cole, S.; Aita, S.L.; Raji, C.; Boyd, A.; et al. Precision Medicine Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Successful Randomized Controlled Trial. Preprints 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. O’Riordan, K.J.; Moloney, G.M.; Keane, L.; Clarke, G.; Cryan, J.F. The gut microbiota-immune-brain axis: Therapeutic implications. Cell Rep. Med. 2025, 6, 101982. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Shang, W.; Gu, Z.; Li, L.; Cheng, L.; Hong, Y. Mechanisms of a Ketogenic Diet and High-Carbohydrate Diets on Cognitive Impairment and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Nutr. Rev. 2025, nuaf198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Yang, J.; Liang, J.; Hu, N.; He, N.; Liu, B.; Liu, G.; Qin, Y. The Gut Microbiota Modulates Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease: Elucidating Crucial Factors and Mechanistic Underpinnings. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024, 30, e70091. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Pfaffinger, J.M.; Hays, K.E.; Seeley, J.; Ramesh Babu, P.; Ryznar, R. Gut dysbiosis as a potential driver of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Front. Neurosci. 2025, 19, 1600148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, C.; Wang, G.Q.; Li, D.D.; Zhang, F. Microbiota-gut-brain axis in neurodegenerative diseases: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Mol. Biomed. 2025, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Gao, M.; Jebb, S.A.; Aveyard, P.; Ambrosini, G.L.; Perez-Cornago, A.; Papier, K.; Carter, J.; Piernas, C. Associations Between Dietary Patterns and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective Cohort Study of 120,343 UK Biobank Participants. Diabetes Care 2022, 45, 1315–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Jones, J.M.; Garcia, C.G.; Braun, H.J. Perspective: Whole and Refined Grains and Health-Evidence Supporting “Make Half Your Grains Whole”. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. McKeown, N.M.; Troy, L.M.; Jacques, P.F.; Hoffmann, U.; O’Donnell, C.J.; Fox, C.S. Whole- and refined-grain intakes are differentially associated with abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adiposity in healthy adults: The Framingham Heart Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 1165–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Lammers, K.M.; Lu, R.; Brownley, J.; Lu, B.; Gerard, C.; Thomas, K.; Rallabhandi, P.; Shea-Donohue, T.; Tamiz, A.; Alkan, S.; et al. Gliadin induces an increase in intestinal permeability and zonulin release by binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR3. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 194–204 e193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Veres-Szekely, A.; Szasz, C.; Pap, D.; Szebeni, B.; Bokrossy, P.; Vannay, A. Zonulin as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis Disorders: Encouraging Results and Emerging Questions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7548. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Cenni, S.; Sesenna, V.; Boiardi, G.; Casertano, M.; Russo, G.; Reginelli, A.; Esposito, S.; Strisciuglio, C. The Role of Gluten in Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Eswaran, S.; Goel, A.; Chey, W.D. What role does wheat play in the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome? Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 9, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
  60. de Punder, K.; Pruimboom, L. The dietary intake of wheat and other cereal grains and their role in inflammation. Nutrients 2013, 5, 771–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  61. Randeni, N.; Bordiga, M.; Xu, B. A Comprehensive Review of the Triangular Relationship among Diet-Gut Microbiota-Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9366. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Monteiro, C.A.; Louzada, M.L.; Steele-Martinez, E.; Cannon, G.; Andrade, G.C.; Baker, P.; Bes-Rastrollo, M.; Bonaccio, M.; Gearhardt, A.N.; Khandpur, N.; et al. Ultra-processed foods and human health: The main thesis and the evidence. Lancet 2025, 406, 2667–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Srour, B.; Fezeu, L.K.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Alles, B.; Debras, C.; Druesne-Pecollo, N.; Chazelas, E.; Deschasaux, M.; Hercberg, S.; Galan, P.; et al. Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Sante Prospective Cohort. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Ludwig, D.S.; Ebbeling, C.B. The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity: Beyond “Calories In, Calories Out”. JAMA Intern. Med. 2018, 178, 1098–1103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, G.Y.; Lim, J.H.; Joung, H.; Yoon, D. Association Between Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Metabolic Disorders in Children and Adolescents with Obesity. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Suez, J.; Korem, T.; Zeevi, D.; Zilberman-Schapira, G.; Thaiss, C.A.; Maza, O.; Israeli, D.; Zmora, N.; Gilad, S.; Weinberger, A.; et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature 2014, 514, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; O’Keefe, J.H. Omega-6 vegetable oils as a driver of coronary heart disease: The oxidized linoleic acid hypothesis. Open Heart 2018, 5, e000898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  68. Satija, A.; Hu, F.B. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 28, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  69. Liang, J.; Wen, Y.; Yin, J.; Zhu, G.; Wang, T. Utilization of plant-based foods for effective prevention of chronic diseases: A longitudinal cohort study. npj Sci. Food 2024, 8, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  70. Hu, F.B.; Malik, V.S. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: Epidemiologic evidence. Physiol. Behav. 2010, 100, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  71. Simopoulos, A.P. Dietary omega-3 fatty acid deficiency and high fructose intake in the development of metabolic syndrome, brain metabolic abnormalities, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2901–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Malik, V.S.; Hu, F.B. Sweeteners and Risk of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: The Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2012, 12, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Bray, G.A. Energy and fructose from beverages sweetened with sugar or high-fructose corn syrup pose a health risk for some people. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Cunnane, S.; Nugent, S.; Roy, M.; Courchesne-Loyer, A.; Croteau, E.; Tremblay, S.; Castellano, A.; Pifferi, F.; Bocti, C.; Paquet, N.; et al. Brain fuel metabolism, aging, and Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrition 2011, 27, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Lustig, R.H.; Schmidt, L.A.; Brindis, C.D. Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 2012, 482, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Kellar, D.; Craft, S. Brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: Mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Lancet. Neurol. 2020, 19, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. de la Monte, S.M.; Wands, J.R. Alzheimer’s disease is type 3 diabetes-evidence reviewed. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2008, 2, 1101–1113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Gardner, C.D.; Vadiveloo, M.K.; Petersen, K.S.; Anderson, C.A.M.; Springfield, S.; Van Horn, L.; Khera, A.; Lamendola, C.; Mayo, S.M.; Joseph, J.J.; et al. Popular Dietary Patterns: Alignment with American Heart Association 2021 Dietary Guidance: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023, 147, 1715–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  79. Beeri, M.S.; Bendlin, B.B. The link between type 2 diabetes and dementia: From biomarkers to treatment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 736–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  80. Neumann, K.F.; Rojo, L.; Navarrete, L.P.; Farias, G.; Reyes, P.; Maccioni, R.B. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s disease: Molecular links & clinical implications. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2008, 5, 438–447. [Google Scholar]
  81. Biessels, G.J.; Despa, F. Cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes mellitus: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  82. Yu, J.; Lee, K.N.; Kim, H.S.; Han, K.; Lee, S.H. Cumulative effect of impaired fasting glucose on the risk of dementia in middle-aged and elderly people: A nationwide cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  83. Salehi, A.; Gunnerud, U.; Muhammed, S.J.; Ostman, E.; Holst, J.J.; Bjorck, I.; Rorsman, P. The insulinogenic effect of whey protein is partially mediated by a direct effect of amino acids and GIP on beta-cells. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 9, 48. [Google Scholar]
  84. Gunnerud, U.; Holst, J.J.; Ostman, E.; Bjorck, I. The glycemic, insulinemic and plasma amino acid responses to equi-carbohydrate milk meals, a pilot- study of bovine and human milk. Nutr. J. 2012, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  85. Toffolon, A.; de Rocco-Ponce, M.; Vettore, M.; Iori, E.; Lante, A.; Tessari, P. Effect of Reversal of Whey-Protein to Casein Ratio of Cow Milk, on Insulin, Incretin, and Amino Acid Responses in Humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, e2100069. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jianqin, S.; Leiming, X.; Lu, X.; Yelland, G.W.; Ni, J.; Clarke, A.J. Effects of milk containing only A2 beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on gastrointestinal physiology, symptoms of discomfort, and cognitive behavior of people with self-reported intolerance to traditional cows’ milk. Nutr. J. 2016, 15, 35. [Google Scholar]
  87. Aune, D.; Norat, T.; Romundstad, P.; Vatten, L.J. Dairy products and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 1066–1083. [Google Scholar]
  88. Brooke-Taylor, S.; Dwyer, K.; Woodford, K.; Kost, N. Systematic Review of the Gastrointestinal Effects of A1 Compared with A2 beta-Casein. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Kullenberg de Gaudry, D.; Lohner, S.; Schmucker, C.; Kapp, P.; Motschall, E.; Horrlein, S.; Roger, C.; Meerpohl, J.J. Milk A1 beta-casein and health-related outcomes in humans: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2019, 77, 278–306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Catanzaro, R.; Sciuto, M.; Marotta, F. Lactose intolerance: An update on its pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Nutr. Res. 2021, 89, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Deng, Y.; Misselwitz, B.; Dai, N.; Fox, M. Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Biological Mechanism and Dietary Management. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8020–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  92. Jeong, H.; Park, Y.S.; Yoon, S.S. A2 milk consumption and its health benefits: An update. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 33, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Ramakrishnan, M.; Eaton, T.K.; Sermet, O.M.; Savaiano, D.A. Milk Containing A2 beta-Casein ONLY, as a Single Meal, Causes Fewer Symptoms of Lactose Intolerance than Milk Containing A1 and A2 beta-Caseins in Subjects with Lactose Maldigestion and Intolerance: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3855. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. He, M.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Z.Q.; Yang, Y.X. Effects of cow’s milk beta-casein variants on symptoms of milk intolerance in Chinese adults: A multicentre, randomised controlled study. Nutr. J. 2017, 16, 72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Deth, R.; Clarke, A.; Ni, J.; Trivedi, M. Clinical evaluation of glutathione concentrations after consumption of milk containing different subtypes of beta-casein: Results from a randomized, cross-over clinical trial. Nutr. J. 2016, 15, 82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Schonknecht, Y.B.; Crommen, S.; Stoffel-Wagner, B.; Coenen, M.; Fimmers, R.; Stehle, P.; Ramirez, A.; Egert, S. APOE varepsilon4 Is Associated with Postprandial Inflammation in Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome Traits. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3924. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Liu, X.; Beck, T.; Dhana, K.; Tangney, C.C.; Desai, P.; Krueger, K.; Evans, D.A.; Rajan, K.B. Dietary fats and the APOE-e4 risk allele in relation to cognitive decline: A longitudinal investigation in a biracial population sample. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2024, 28, 100211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  98. Dunk, M.M.; Li, J.; Liu, S.; Casanova, R.; Chen, J.C.; Espeland, M.A.; Hayden, K.M.; Manson, J.E.; Rapp, S.R.; Shadyab, A.H.; et al. Associations of dietary cholesterol and fat, blood lipids, and risk for dementia in older women vary by APOE genotype. Alzheimers Dement. 2023, 19, 5742–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Fote, G.M.; Geller, N.R.; Reyes-Ortiz, A.M.; Thompson, L.M.; Steffan, J.S.; Grill, J.D. A Scoping Review of Dietary Factors Conferring Risk or Protection for Cognitive Decline in APOE epsilon4 Carriers. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2021, 25, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Reiman, E.M.; Chen, K.; Alexander, G.E.; Caselli, R.J.; Bandy, D.; Osborne, D.; Saunders, A.M.; Hardy, J. Correlations between apolipoprotein E epsilon4 gene dose and brain-imaging measurements of regional hypometabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8299–8302. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Mosconi, L.; Pupi, A.; De Leon, M.J. Brain glucose hypometabolism and oxidative stress in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1147, 180–195. [Google Scholar]
  102. Cunnane, S.C.; Courchesne-Loyer, A.; St-Pierre, V.; Vandenberghe, C.; Pierotti, T.; Fortier, M.; Croteau, E.; Castellano, C.A. Can ketones compensate for deteriorating brain glucose uptake during aging? Implications for the risk and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1367, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Craft, S. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis: Potential mechanisms and implications for treatment. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2007, 4, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Arnold, S.E.; Arvanitakis, Z.; Macauley-Rambach, S.L.; Koenig, A.M.; Wang, H.Y.; Ahima, R.S.; Craft, S.; Gandy, S.; Buettner, C.; Stoeckel, L.E.; et al. Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: Concepts and conundrums. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Rusek, M.; Pluta, R.; Ulamek-Koziol, M.; Czuczwar, S.J. Ketogenic Diet in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Cunnane, S.C.; Swerdlow, R.H.; Inzitari, M.; Olaso-Gonzalez, G.; Vina, J. Multimodal strategy to rescue the brain in mild cognitive impairment: Ketogenic oral nutrition supplementation with B vitamins and aerobic exercise. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 52, e13806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Jiang, Z.; Yin, X.; Wang, M.; Chen, T.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Wang, Z. Effects of Ketogenic Diet on Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Aging Dis. 2022, 13, 1146–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Tao, Y.; Leng, S.X.; Zhang, H. Ketogenic Diet: An Effective Treatment Approach for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2022, 20, 2303–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  109. Bohnen, J.L.B.; Albin, R.L.; Bohnen, N.I. Ketogenic interventions in mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and critical appraisal. Front. Neurol. 2023, 14, 1123290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Oliveira, T.P.D.; Morais, A.L.B.; Dos Reis, P.L.B.; Palotas, A.; Vieira, L.B. A Potential Role for the Ketogenic Diet in Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment: Exploring Pre-Clinical and Clinical Evidence. Metabolites 2023, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Monda, A.; La Torre, M.E.; Messina, A.; Di Maio, G.; Monda, V.; Moscatelli, F.; De Stefano, M.; La Marra, M.; Padova, M.D.; Dipace, A.; et al. Exploring the ketogenic diet’s potential in reducing neuroinflammation and modulating immune responses. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1425816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Bonnechere, B.; Stephens, E.B.; Boileau, A.C.; Ducker, M.; Stubbs, B.J. The Effect of Exogenous Ketone Bodies on Cognition in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer’s Disease and in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Veech, R.L. The therapeutic implications of ketone bodies: The effects of ketone bodies in pathological conditions: Ketosis, ketogenic diet, redox states, insulin resistance, and mitochondrial metabolism. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2004, 70, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  114. Krikorian, R.; Shidler, M.D.; Dangelo, K.; Couch, S.C.; Benoit, S.C.; Clegg, D.J. Dietary ketosis enhances memory in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 425.e19–425.e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Rubio, C.; Lopez-Landa, A.; Romo-Parra, H.; Rubio-Osornio, M. Impact of the Ketogenic Diet on Neurological Diseases: A Review. Life 2025, 15, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  116. Puchalska, P.; Crawford, P.A. Multi-dimensional Roles of Ketone Bodies in Fuel Metabolism, Signaling, and Therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 262–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  117. Price, S.; Ruppar, T.M. Ketogenic therapies in Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and mild cognitive impairment: An integrative review. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2023, 74, 151745. [Google Scholar]
  118. Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Goulis, D.G.; Gkiouras, K.; Theodoridis, X.; Gkouskou, K.K.; Evangeliou, A.; Dardiotis, E.; Bogdanos, D.P. To Keto or Not to Keto? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing the Effects of Ketogenic Therapy on Alzheimer Disease. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 1583–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Constantino, N.J.; Ashley, C.C.; Macauley, S.L. The Energetic Collapse of the Alzheimer’s Brain: Metabolic Inflexibility Across Cells and Networks. J. Neurochem. 2025, 169, e70294. [Google Scholar]
  120. Sridharan, B.; Lee, M.J. Ketogenic Diet: A Promising Neuroprotective Composition for Managing Alzheimer’s Diseases and its Pathological Mechanisms. Curr. Mol. Med. 2022, 22, 640–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Norwitz, N.G.; Saif, N.; Ariza, I.E.; Isaacson, R.S. Precision Nutrition for Alzheimer’s Prevention in ApoE4 Carriers. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1362. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Fulghum, K.; Salathe, S.F.; Davis, X.; Thyfault, J.P.; Puchalska, P.; Crawford, P.A. Ketone body metabolism and cardiometabolic implications for cognitive health. npj Metab. Health Dis. 2024, 2, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Xiao, Y.L.; Gong, Y.; Qi, Y.J.; Shao, Z.M.; Jiang, Y.Z. Effects of dietary intervention on human diseases: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  124. Park, H.; Ni, M.; Le, Y. Neuroinflammation and nutrition in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurol. 2025, 16, 1622571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  125. Tuigunov, D.; Sinyavskiy, Y.; Nurgozhin, T.; Zholdassova, Z.; Smagul, G.; Omarov, Y.; Dolmatova, O.; Yeshmanova, A.; Omarova, I. Precision Nutrition and Gut-Brain Axis Modulation in the Prevention of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  126. Blazquez, E.; Hurtado-Carneiro, V.; LeBaut-Ayuso, Y.; Velazquez, E.; Garcia-Garcia, L.; Gomez-Oliver, F.; Ruiz-Albusac, J.M.; Avila, J.; Pozo, M.A. Significance of Brain Glucose Hypometabolism, Altered Insulin Signal Transduction, and Insulin Resistance in Several Neurological Diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 873301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Kearns, R. Gut-Brain Axis and Neuroinflammation: The Role of Gut Permeability and the Kynurenine Pathway in Neurological Disorders. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024, 44, 64. [Google Scholar]
  128. Philip, A.; White, N.D. Gluten, Inflammation, and Neurodegeneration. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2022, 16, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  129. Rong, L.; Peng, Y.; Shen, Q.; Chen, K.; Fang, B.; Li, W. Effects of ketogenic diet on cognitive function of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2024, 28, 100306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  130. Newport, M.T.; VanItallie, T.B.; Kashiwaya, Y.; King, M.T.; Veech, R.L. A new way to produce hyperketonemia: Use of ketone ester in a case of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015, 11, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  131. Meiners, F.; Ortega-Matienzo, A.; Fuellen, G.; Barrantes, I. Gut microbiome-mediated health effects of fiber and polyphenol-rich dietary interventions. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1647740. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Nguyen, T.T.; Ta, Q.T.H.; Nguyen, T.K.O.; Nguyen, T.T.D.; Giau, V.V. Type 3 Diabetes and Its Role Implications in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  133. Michailidis, M.; Moraitou, D.; Tata, D.A.; Kalinderi, K.; Papamitsou, T.; Papaliagkas, V. Alzheimer’s Disease as Type 3 Diabetes: Common Pathophysiological Mechanisms between Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2687. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Costantini, L.C.; Barr, L.J.; Vogel, J.L.; Henderson, S.T. Hypometabolism as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Neurosci. 2008, 9, S16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Meng, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Guo, R.; Liu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Li, W.; Song, Q.; et al. Type 3 diabetes and metabolic reprogramming of brain neurons: Causes and therapeutic strategies. Mol. Med. 2025, 31, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  136. Llorente-Folch, I.; Dussmann, H.; Watters, O.; Connolly, N.M.C.; Prehn, J.H.M. Ketone body beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) preserves mitochondrial bioenergetics. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19664. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  137. Gomora-Garcia, J.C.; Montiel, T.; Huttenrauch, M.; Salcido-Gomez, A.; Garcia-Velazquez, L.; Ramiro-Cortes, Y.; Gomora, J.C.; Castro-Obregon, S.; Massieu, L. Effect of the Ketone Body, D-beta-Hydroxybutyrate, on Sirtuin2-Mediated Regulation of Mitochondrial Quality Control and the Autophagy-Lysosomal Pathway. Cells 2023, 12, 486. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Fante, C.; Spritzler, F.; Calabrese, L.; Laurent, N.; Roberts, C.; Deloudi, S. The role of beta-hydroxybutyrate testing in ketogenic metabolic therapies. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1629921. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  139. Koppel, S.J.; Swerdlow, R.H. Neuroketotherapeutics: A modern review of a century-old therapy. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 117, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  140. Garcia-Rodriguez, D.; Gimenez-Cassina, A. Ketone Bodies in the Brain Beyond Fuel Metabolism: From Excitability to Gene Expression and Cell Signaling. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 732120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  141. Xie, J.; Van Hoecke, L.; Vandenbroucke, R.E. The Impact of Systemic Inflammation on Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 796867. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  142. Zhang, W.; Xiao, D.; Mao, Q.; Xia, H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  143. Ritson, M.; Wheeler-Jones, C.P.D.; Stolp, H.B. Endothelial dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease: Is endothelial inflammation an overlooked druggable target? J. Neuroimmunol. 2024, 391, 578363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  144. Goncalves, M.; Vale, N.; Silva, P. Neuroprotective Effects of Olive Oil: A Comprehensive Review of Antioxidant Properties. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Picone, P.; Girgenti, A.; Buttacavoli, M.; Nuzzo, D. Enriching the Mediterranean diet could nourish the brain more effectively. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1489489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Romani, A.; Ieri, F.; Urciuoli, S.; Noce, A.; Marrone, G.; Nediani, C.; Bernini, R. Health Effects of Phenolic Compounds Found in Extra-Virgin Olive Oil, By-Products, and Leaf of Olea europaea L. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1776. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  147. Devranis, P.; Vassilopoulou, E.; Tsironis, V.; Sotiriadis, P.M.; Chourdakis, M.; Aivaliotis, M.; Tsolaki, M. Mediterranean Diet, Ketogenic Diet or MIND Diet for Aging Populations with Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review. Life 2023, 13, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  148. Arora, S.; Santiago, J.A.; Bernstein, M.; Potashkin, J.A. Diet and lifestyle impact the development and progression of Alzheimer’s dementia. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1213223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  149. Neth, B.J.; Huynh, K.; Giles, C.; Wang, T.; Mellett, N.A.; Duong, T.; Blach, C.; Schimmel, L.; Register, T.C.; Blennow, K.; et al. Consuming a modified Mediterranean ketogenic diet reverses the peripheral lipid signature of Alzheimer’s disease in humans. Commun. Med. 2025, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  150. Park, G.; Kadyan, S.; Hochuli, N.; Pollak, J.; Wang, B.; Salazar, G.; Chakrabarty, P.; Efron, P.; Sheffler, J.; Nagpal, R. A modified Mediterranean-style diet enhances brain function via specific gut-microbiome-brain mechanisms. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2323752. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  151. Kyriazis, I.D.; Vassi, E.; Alvanou, M.; Angelakis, C.; Skaperda, Z.; Tekos, F.; Garikipati, V.N.S.; Spandidos, D.A.; Kouretas, D. The impact of diet upon mitochondrial physiology (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2022, 50, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  152. Manoogian, E.N.C.; Chow, L.S.; Taub, P.R.; Laferrere, B.; Panda, S. Time-restricted Eating for the Prevention and Management of Metabolic Diseases. Endocr. Rev. 2022, 43, 405–436. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  153. Savencu, C.E.; Linta, A.; Farcas, G.; Bina, A.M.; Cretu, O.M.; Malita, D.C.; Muntean, D.M.; Sturza, A. Impact of Dietary Restriction Regimens on Mitochondria, Heart, and Endothelial Function: A Brief Overview. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 768383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  154. Hersant, H.; Grossberg, G. The Ketogenic Diet and Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2022, 26, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  155. Jamshed, H.; Beyl, R.A.; Della Manna, D.L.; Yang, E.S.; Ravussin, E.; Peterson, C.M. Early Time-Restricted Feeding Improves 24-Hour Glucose Levels and Affects Markers of the Circadian Clock, Aging, and Autophagy in Humans. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  156. Kapogiannis, D.; Manolopoulos, A.; Mullins, R.; Avgerinos, K.; Delgado-Peraza, F.; Mustapic, M.; Nogueras-Ortiz, C.; Yao, P.J.; Pucha, K.A.; Brooks, J.; et al. Brain responses to intermittent fasting and the healthy living diet in older adults. Cell Metab. 2024, 36, 1668–1678.E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  157. Pistollato, F.; Iglesias, R.C.; Ruiz, R.; Aparicio, S.; Crespo, J.; Lopez, L.D.; Manna, P.P.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Nutritional patterns associated with the maintenance of neurocognitive functions and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: A focus on human studies. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 131, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  158. Pena-Jorquera, H.; Cid-Jofre, V.; Landaeta-Diaz, L.; Petermann-Rocha, F.; Martorell, M.; Zbinden-Foncea, H.; Ferrari, G.; Jorquera-Aguilera, C.; Cristi-Montero, C. Plant-Based Nutrition: Exploring Health Benefits for Atherosclerosis, Chronic Diseases, and Metabolic Syndrome-A Comprehensive Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3244. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  159. Morris, M.C. Nutrition and risk of dementia: Overview and methodological issues. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1367, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  160. Solfrizzi, V.; Panza, F.; Frisardi, V.; Seripa, D.; Logroscino, G.; Imbimbo, B.P.; Pilotto, A. Diet and Alzheimer’s disease risk factors or prevention: The current evidence. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2011, 11, 677–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  161. Roumeliotis, S.; Kontogiorgos, I.; de Vries, F.; Maresz, K.; Jeanne, J.F.; Leivaditis, K.; Schurgers, L.J. The role of vitamin K2 in cognitive impairment: Linking vascular health to brain health. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2024, 16, 1527535. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  162. Taylor, M.K.; Swerdlow, R.H.; Burns, J.M.; Sullivan, D.K. An Experimental Ketogenic Diet for Alzheimer Disease Was Nutritionally Dense and Rich in Vegetables and Avocado. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3, nzz003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  163. Verkerk, R.; Schreiner, M.; Krumbein, A.; Ciska, E.; Holst, B.; Rowland, I.; De Schrijver, R.; Hansen, M.; Gerhauser, C.; Mithen, R.; et al. Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: The influence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  164. Houghton, C.A.; Fassett, R.G.; Coombes, J.S. Sulforaphane: Translational research from laboratory bench to clinic. Nutr. Rev. 2013, 71, 709–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  165. Vermeulen, M.; Klopping-Ketelaars, I.W.; van den Berg, R.; Vaes, W.H. Bioavailability and kinetics of sulforaphane in humans after consumption of cooked versus raw broccoli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10505–10509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  166. Li, L.; Ma, P.; Nirasawa, S.; Liu, H. Formation, immunomodulatory activities, and enhancement of glucosinolates and sulforaphane in broccoli sprouts: A review for maximizing the health benefits to human. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 7118–7148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  167. Devore, E.E.; Kang, J.H.; Breteler, M.M.; Grodstein, F. Dietary intakes of berries and flavonoids in relation to cognitive decline. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 72, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  168. Krikorian, R.; Shidler, M.D.; Nash, T.A.; Kalt, W.; Vinqvist-Tymchuk, M.R.; Shukitt-Hale, B.; Joseph, J.A. Blueberry supplementation improves memory in older adults. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 3996–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  169. Joseph, J.A.; Shukitt-Hale, B.; Denisova, N.A.; Bielinski, D.; Martin, A.; McEwen, J.J.; Bickford, P.C. Reversals of age-related declines in neuronal signal transduction, cognitive, and motor behavioral deficits with blueberry, spinach, or strawberry dietary supplementation. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 8114–8121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  170. Chai, S.C.; Jerusik, J.; Davis, K.; Wright, R.S.; Zhang, Z. Effect of Montmorency tart cherry juice on cognitive performance in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 4423–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  171. Chai, S.C.; Davis, K.; Zhang, Z.; Zha, L.; Kirschner, K.F. Effects of Tart Cherry Juice on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Older Adults. Nutrients 2019, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  172. Ashor, A.W.; Brown, R.; Keenan, P.D.; Willis, N.D.; Siervo, M.; Mathers, J.C. Limited evidence for a beneficial effect of vitamin C supplementation on biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Nutr. Res. 2019, 61, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  173. Jenkins, D.J.; Kendall, C.W.; Augustin, L.S.; Franceschi, S.; Hamidi, M.; Marchie, A.; Jenkins, A.L.; Axelsen, M. Glycemic index: Overview of implications in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 266S–273S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  174. Mulholland, H.G.; Murray, L.J.; Cantwell, M.M. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 475–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  175. Barclay, A.W.; Petocz, P.; McMillan-Price, J.; Flood, V.M.; Prvan, T.; Mitchell, P.; Brand-Miller, J.C. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk--a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  176. Pacheco, L.S.; Li, Y.; Rimm, E.B.; Manson, J.E.; Sun, Q.; Rexrode, K.; Hu, F.B.; Guasch-Ferre, M. Avocado Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e024014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  177. Serreli, G.; Deiana, M. Extra Virgin Olive Oil Polyphenols: Modulation of Cellular Pathways Related to Oxidant Species and Inflammation in Aging. Cells 2020, 9, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  178. Garrido-Romero, M.; Diez-Municio, M.; Moreno, F.J. Exploring the Impact of Olive-Derived Bioactive Components on Gut Microbiota: Implications for Digestive Health. Foods 2025, 14, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  179. Unlu, N.Z.; Bohn, T.; Clinton, S.K.; Schwartz, S.J. Carotenoid absorption from salad and salsa by humans is enhanced by the addition of avocado or avocado oil. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  180. Shanaida, M.; Mykhailenko, O.; Lysiuk, R.; Hudz, N.; Balwierz, R.; Shulhai, A.; Shapovalova, N.; Shanaida, V.; Bjorklund, G. Carotenoids for Antiaging: Nutraceutical, Pharmaceutical, and Cosmeceutical Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  181. Szucko-Kociuba, I.; Trzeciak-Ryczek, A.; Kupnicka, P.; Chlubek, D. Neurotrophic and Neuroprotective Effects of Hericium erinaceus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  182. Contato, A.G.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Lion’s Mane Mushroom (Hericium erinaceus): A Neuroprotective Fungus with Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antimicrobial Potential-A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  183. Cha, S.; Bell, L.; Shukitt-Hale, B.; Williams, C.M. A review of the effects of mushrooms on mood and neurocognitive health across the lifespan. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2024, 158, 105548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  184. Saitsu, Y.; Nishide, A.; Kikushima, K.; Shimizu, K.; Ohnuki, K. Improvement of cognitive functions by oral intake of Hericium erinaceus. Biomed. Res. 2019, 40, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  185. Gregory, J.; Vengalasetti, Y.V.; Bredesen, D.E.; Rao, R.V. Neuroprotective Herbs for the Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  186. Mirmosayyeb, O.; Tanhaei, A.; Sohrabi, H.R.; Martins, R.N.; Tanhaei, M.; Najafi, M.A.; Safaei, A.; Meamar, R. Possible Role of Common Spices as a Preventive and Therapeutic Agent for Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  187. Seibel, R.; Schneider, R.H.; Gottlieb, M.G.V. Effects of Spices (Saffron, Rosemary, Cinnamon, Turmeric and Ginger) in Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2021, 18, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  188. Mandel, S.; Amit, T.; Reznichenko, L.; Weinreb, O.; Youdim, M.B. Green tea catechins as brain-permeable, natural iron chelators-antioxidants for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2006, 50, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  189. Weinreb, O.; Mandel, S.; Amit, T.; Youdim, M.B. Neurological mechanisms of green tea polyphenols in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2004, 15, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  190. Kuriyama, S.; Hozawa, A.; Ohmori, K.; Shimazu, T.; Matsui, T.; Ebihara, S.; Awata, S.; Nagatomi, R.; Arai, H.; Tsuji, I. Green tea consumption and cognitive function: A cross-sectional study from the Tsurugaya Project 1. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  191. Hernandez, L.M.; Xu, E.G.; Larsson, H.C.E.; Tahara, R.; Maisuria, V.B.; Tufenkji, N. Plastic Teabags Release Billions of Microparticles and Nanoparticles into Tea. Env. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 12300–12310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  192. Fard, N.J.H.; Jahedi, F.; Turner, A. Microplastics and nanoplastics in tea: Sources, characteristics and potential impacts. Food Chem. 2025, 466, 142111. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  193. Eskelinen, M.H.; Kivipelto, M. Caffeine as a protective factor in dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 20, S167–S174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  194. Poole, R.; Kennedy, O.J.; Roderick, P.; Fallowfield, J.A.; Hayes, P.C.; Parkes, J. Coffee consumption and health: Umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes. BMJ 2017, 359, j5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  195. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant and Antiradical Activity of Coffee. Antioxidants 2013, 2, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  196. Stanek, N.; Zarebska, M.; Bilos, L.; Barabosz, K.; Nowakowska-Bogdan, E.; Semeniuk, I.; Blaszkiewicz, J.; Kulesza, R.; Matejuk, R.; Szkutnik, K. Influence of coffee brewing methods on the chromatographic and spectroscopic profiles, antioxidant and sensory properties. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  197. Caprioli, G.; Cortese, M.; Sagratini, G.; Vittori, S. The influence of different types of preparation (espresso and brew) on coffee aroma and main bioactive constituents. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  198. Socala, K.; Szopa, A.; Serefko, A.; Poleszak, E.; Wlaz, P. Neuroprotective Effects of Coffee Bioactive Compounds: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  199. Barros, M.I.; Brandao, T.; Irving, S.C.; Alves, P.; Gomes, F.; Correia, M. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Cognitive Decline in Adults with Non-Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  200. Burckhardt, M.; Herke, M.; Wustmann, T.; Watzke, S.; Langer, G.; Fink, A. Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of dementia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 4, CD009002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  201. Van Dael, P. Role of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human nutrition and health: Review of recent studies and recommendations. Nutr. Res. Pr. 2021, 15, 137–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  202. Mozaffarian, D.; Katan, M.B.; Ascherio, A.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 1601–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  203. Simopoulos, A.P. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002, 56, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  204. de Souza, R.J.; Mente, A.; Maroleanu, A.; Cozma, A.I.; Ha, V.; Kishibe, T.; Uleryk, E.; Budylowski, P.; Schunemann, H.; Beyene, J.; et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2015, 351, h3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  205. Moreno-Luna, R.; Munoz-Hernandez, R.; Miranda, M.L.; Costa, A.F.; Jimenez-Jimenez, L.; Vallejo-Vaz, A.J.; Muriana, F.J.; Villar, J.; Stiefel, P. Olive oil polyphenols decrease blood pressure and improve endothelial function in young women with mild hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 2012, 25, 1299–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  206. Hernaez, A.; Fernandez-Castillejo, S.; Farras, M.; Catalan, U.; Subirana, I.; Montes, R.; Sola, R.; Munoz-Aguayo, D.; Gelabert-Gorgues, A.; Diaz-Gil, O.; et al. Olive oil polyphenols enhance high-density lipoprotein function in humans: A randomized controlled trial. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vac. Biol. 2014, 34, 2115–2119. [Google Scholar]
  207. Fiore, M.; Terracina, S.; Ferraguti, G. Brain Neurotrophins and Plant Polyphenols: A Powerful Connection. Molecules 2025, 30, 2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  208. Minihane, A.M.; Jofre-Monseny, L.; Olano-Martin, E.; Rimbach, G. ApoE genotype, cardiovascular risk and responsiveness to dietary fat manipulation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2007, 66, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  209. Dunk, M.M.; Driscoll, I.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I. Total Cholesterol and APOE-Related Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2022, 85, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  210. Glenn, A.J.; Aune, D.; Freisling, H.; Mohammadifard, N.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Salas-Salvado, J.; Jenkins, D.J.A.; Hu, F.B.; Sievenpiper, J.L. Nuts and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: A Review of the Evidence and Future Directions. Nutrients 2023, 15, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  211. Gupta, R.K.; Gangoliya, S.S.; Singh, N.K. Reduction of phytic acid and enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 676–684. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  212. Salim, R.; Nehvi, I.B.; Mir, R.A.; Tyagi, A.; Ali, S.; Bhat, O.M. A review on anti-nutritional factors: Unraveling the natural gateways to human health. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1215873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  213. Kheto, A.; Choudhury, D.B.; Sarkhel, S.; Sarkar, A.; Kumar, Y.; Kaur, S.; Gupta, A.K.; Bist, Y.; Vashishth, R.; Bharath, N.; et al. Anti-nutritional factors: Nutrient interactions, processing interventions, and health aspects. Food Chem. 2025, 496, 146746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  214. Zhou, Y.; Xu, M.; Umer, M.J.; Wang, R.; Xiao, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Huai, D.; Li, S.; Lu, Q.; Hong, Y.; et al. Chemical profile changes in Peanut seeds infected with aspergillus flavus via widely targeted metabolomics. Food Chem. 2025, 471, 142750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  215. Ros, E. Nuts and novel biomarkers of cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1649S–1656S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  216. Ros, E. Health benefits of nut consumption. Nutrients 2010, 2, 652–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  217. Sanders, M.E.; Hill, C. The microbiome: An actor or stage for the beneficial action of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics? Cell Host Microbe 2025, 33, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  218. Valcheva, R.; Dieleman, L.A. Prebiotics: Definition and protective mechanisms. Best. Pr. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2016, 30, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  219. Roberfroid, M.; Gibson, G.R.; Hoyles, L.; McCartney, A.L.; Rastall, R.; Rowland, I.; Wolvers, D.; Watzl, B.; Szajewska, H.; Stahl, B.; et al. Prebiotic effects: Metabolic and health benefits. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, S1–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  220. Marco, M.L.; Heeney, D.; Binda, S.; Cifelli, C.J.; Cotter, P.D.; Foligne, B.; Ganzle, M.; Kort, R.; Pasin, G.; Pihlanto, A.; et al. Health benefits of fermented foods: Microbiota and beyond. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  221. Grujovic, M.Z.; Semedo-Lemsaddek, T.; Markovic, K.G. Application of Probiotics in Foods: A Comprehensive Review of Benefits, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Foods 2025, 14, 3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  222. Calzada-Gonzales, N.; Moreno-Colina, I.; Chu-Fuentes, L.; Andrade-Giron, D.; Tito-Chura, H.E.; Quispe-Vicuna, C.; Torres-Balarezo, P.I.; Bautista-Pariona, A.; Barboza, J.J. Efficacy and safety of probiotic supplements on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2025, 25, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  223. Topping, D.L.; Clifton, P.M. Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: Roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 1031–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  224. Birt, D.F.; Boylston, T.; Hendrich, S.; Jane, J.L.; Hollis, J.; Li, L.; McClelland, J.; Moore, S.; Phillips, G.J.; Rowling, M.; et al. Resistant starch: Promise for improving human health. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  225. Canfora, E.E.; Jocken, J.W.; Blaak, E.E. Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  226. Koh, A.; De Vadder, F.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Backhed, F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell 2016, 165, 1332–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  227. Daley, C.A.; Abbott, A.; Doyle, P.S.; Nader, G.A.; Larson, S. A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef. Nutr. J. 2010, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  228. Spears, M.; Cooper, G.; Sather, B.; Bailey, M.; Boles, J.A.; Bothner, B.; Miles, M.P. Comparative Impact of Organic Grass-Fed and Conventional Cattle-Feeding Systems on Beef and Human Postprandial Metabolomics-A Randomized Clinical Trial. Metabolites 2024, 14, 533. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  229. Samraj, A.N.; Pearce, O.M.; Laubli, H.; Crittenden, A.N.; Bergfeld, A.K.; Banda, K.; Gregg, C.J.; Bingman, A.E.; Secrest, P.; Diaz, S.L.; et al. A red meat-derived glycan promotes inflammation and cancer progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  230. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Gu, X.; Liu, Y.; Dong, D.; Kang, J.H.; Wang, M.; Eliassen, H.; Willett, W.C.; Stampfer, M.J.; et al. Long-Term Intake of Red Meat in Relation to Dementia Risk and Cognitive Function in US Adults. Neurology 2025, 104, e210286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  231. Kurt, T.D.; Jiang, L.; Fernandez-Borges, N.; Bett, C.; Liu, J.; Yang, T.; Spraker, T.R.; Castilla, J.; Eisenberg, D.; Kong, Q.; et al. Human prion protein sequence elements impede cross-species chronic wasting disease transmission. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 1485–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  232. Levine, M.E.; Suarez, J.A.; Brandhorst, S.; Balasubramanian, P.; Cheng, C.W.; Madia, F.; Fontana, L.; Mirisola, M.G.; Guevara-Aguirre, J.; Wan, J.; et al. Low protein intake is associated with a major reduction in IGF-1, cancer, and overall mortality in the 65 and younger but not older population. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  233. Kitada, M.; Ogura, Y.; Monno, I.; Koya, D. The impact of dietary protein intake on longevity and metabolic health. EBioMedicine 2019, 43, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  234. Babygirija, R.; Lamming, D.W. The regulation of healthspan and lifespan by dietary amino acids. Transl. Med. Aging 2021, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  235. Yurko-Mauro, K.; McCarthy, D.; Rom, D.; Nelson, E.B.; Ryan, A.S.; Blackwell, A.; Salem, N., Jr.; Stedman, M.; Investigators, M. Beneficial effects of docosahexaenoic acid on cognition in age-related cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement. 2010, 6, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  236. Sergin, S.; Jambunathan, V.; Garg, E.; Rowntree, J.E.; Fenton, J.I. Fatty Acid and Antioxidant Profile of Eggs from Pasture-Raised Hens Fed a Corn- and Soy-Free Diet and Supplemented with Grass-Fed Beef Suet and Liver. Foods 2022, 11, 3404. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  237. Davis, H.; Magistrali, A.; Butler, G.; Stergiadis, S. Nutritional Benefits from Fatty Acids in Organic and Grass-Fed Beef. Foods 2022, 11, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  238. Lustig, R.H. Ultraprocessed Food: Addictive, Toxic, and Ready for Regulation. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  239. Basu, S.; Yoffe, P.; Hills, N.; Lustig, R.H. The relationship of sugar to population-level diabetes prevalence: An econometric analysis of repeated cross-sectional data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57873. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  240. Vreman, R.A.; Goodell, A.J.; Rodriguez, L.A.; Porco, T.C.; Lustig, R.H.; Kahn, J.G. Health and economic benefits of reducing sugar intake in the USA, including effects via non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A microsimulation model. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e013543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  241. Chen, D.L.; Liess, C.; Poljak, A.; Xu, A.; Zhang, J.; Thoma, C.; Trenell, M.; Milner, B.; Jenkins, A.B.; Chisholm, D.J.; et al. Phenotypic Characterization of Insulin-Resistant and Insulin-Sensitive Obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 4082–4091. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  242. Imamura, F.; O’Connor, L.; Ye, Z.; Mursu, J.; Hayashino, Y.; Bhupathiraju, S.N.; Forouhi, N.G. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ 2015, 351, h3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  243. Mooradian, A.D. In search for an alternative to sugar to reduce obesity. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2019, 89, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  244. Teysseire, F.; Bordier, V.; Beglinger, C.; Wolnerhanssen, B.K.; Meyer-Gerspach, A.C. Metabolic Effects of Selected Conventional and Alternative Sweeteners: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  245. Anton, S.D.; Martin, C.K.; Han, H.; Coulon, S.; Cefalu, W.T.; Geiselman, P.; Williamson, D.A. Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 2010, 55, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  246. Wu, J.; Jian, Y.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Gong, L.; Liu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W. A Review of the Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of the Fruit of Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle): A Traditional Chinese Medicinal Food. Molecules 2022, 27, 6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  247. Ajami, M.; Seyfi, M.; Abdollah Pouri Hosseini, F.; Naseri, P.; Velayati, A.; Mahmoudnia, F.; Zahedirad, M.; Hajifaraji, M. Effects of stevia on glycemic and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2020, 10, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  248. Raghavan, G.; Bapna, A.; Mehta, A.; Shah, A.; Vyas, T. Effect of Sugar Replacement with Stevia-Based Tabletop Sweetener on Weight and Cardiometabolic Health among Indian Adults. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  249. Kaim, U.; Labus, K. Monk Fruit Extract and Sustainable Health: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  250. Munoz-Labrador, A.; Hernandez-Hernandez, O.; Moreno, F.J. A review of the state of sweeteners science: The natural versus artificial non-caloric sweeteners debate. Stevia rebaudiana and Siraitia grosvenorii into the spotlight. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 44, 1080–1102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  251. Smith, A.; Avery, A.; Ford, R.; Yang, Q.; Goux, A.; Mukherjee, I.; Neville, D.C.A.; Jethwa, P. Rare sugars: Metabolic impacts and mechanisms of action: A scoping review. Br. J. Nutr. 2022, 128, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  252. Noronha, J.C.; Braunstein, C.R.; Glenn, A.J.; Khan, T.A.; Viguiliouk, E.; Noseworthy, R.; Blanco Mejia, S.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Wolever, T.M.S.; Leiter, L.A.; et al. The effect of small doses of fructose and allulose on postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes: A double-blind, randomized, controlled, acute feeding, equivalence trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 2361–2370. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  253. Della Corte, K.; Jalo, E.; Kaartinen, N.E.; Simpson, L.; Taylor, M.A.; Muirhead, R.; Raben, A.; Macdonald, I.A.; Fogelholm, M.; Brand-Miller, J. Longitudinal Associations of Dietary Sugars and Glycaemic Index with Indices of Glucose Metabolism and Body Fatness during 3-Year Weight Loss Maintenance: A PREVIEW Sub-Study. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  254. Lenhart, A.; Chey, W.D. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Polyols on Gastrointestinal Health and Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  255. Livesey, G. Health potential of polyols as sugar replacers, with emphasis on low glycaemic properties. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2003, 16, 163–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  256. Dinges, D.F. Cocoa flavanols, cerebral blood flow, cognition, and health: Going forward. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2006, 47, S221–S223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  257. Sokolov, A.N.; Pavlova, M.A.; Klosterhalfen, S.; Enck, P. Chocolate and the brain: Neurobiological impact of cocoa flavanols on cognition and behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013, 37, 2445–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  258. Veronese, N.; Demurtas, J.; Celotto, S.; Caruso, M.G.; Maggi, S.; Bolzetta, F.; Firth, J.; Smith, L.; Schofield, P.; Koyanagi, A.; et al. Is chocolate consumption associated with health outcomes? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  259. Samanta, S.; Sarkar, T.; Chakraborty, R.; Rebezov, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Rengasamy, K.R.R. Dark chocolate: An overview of its biological activity, processing, and fortification approaches. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 1916–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  260. Abt, E.; Fong Sam, J.; Gray, P.; Robin, L.P. Cadmium and lead in cocoa powder and chocolate products in the US Market. Food Addit. Contam. Part. B Surveill. 2018, 11, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  261. de la Monte, S.M. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s disease. BMB Rep. 2009, 42, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  262. Liu, Y.; Gu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Vyas, C.M.; Peng, C.; Dong, D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Interplay of genetic predisposition, plasma metabolome and Mediterranean diet in dementia risk and cognitive function. Nat. Med. 2025, 31, 3790–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  263. Rao, R.V.; Boyd, A.; Okada, S.; Lipa, W.; Kelly, L.; Coward, C.; Bredesen, A.L.; Gregory, J.; Bredesen, D.E. Short-Term Changes in Depressive Symptoms Among Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Following a Precision Medicine Intervention. Brain Sci. 2025, 16, 2. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Mechanistic framework of the KetoFLEX 12/3 approach in Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Health. Proposed mechanistic framework illustrating how the multidomain components of the KetoFLEX 12/3 program may converge on biological pathways relevant to neuroplasticity and cognitive resilience in Alzheimer’s disease. Nutritional composition, intermittent fasting/meal timing, physical activity, sleep optimization, stress regulation, cognitive stimulation, detoxification strategies, and targeted supplementation are proposed to influence interconnected processes including metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial energetics, inflammation, vascular function, synaptic signaling, and neurotrophic support. The figure is intended as a conceptual representation of mechanisms discussed throughout this article. Abbreviations: BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (axis).
Figure 1. Mechanistic framework of the KetoFLEX 12/3 approach in Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Health. Proposed mechanistic framework illustrating how the multidomain components of the KetoFLEX 12/3 program may converge on biological pathways relevant to neuroplasticity and cognitive resilience in Alzheimer’s disease. Nutritional composition, intermittent fasting/meal timing, physical activity, sleep optimization, stress regulation, cognitive stimulation, detoxification strategies, and targeted supplementation are proposed to influence interconnected processes including metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial energetics, inflammation, vascular function, synaptic signaling, and neurotrophic support. The figure is intended as a conceptual representation of mechanisms discussed throughout this article. Abbreviations: BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (axis).
Nutrients 18 02206 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rao, R.V.; Subramaniam, K.G.; Gregory, J.; Bredesen, A.L.; Coward, C.; Okada, S.; Kelly, L.; Bredesen, D.E. KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet and Cognitive Health: A Precision-Nutrition Perspective on Mechanisms, Emerging Evidence, and Future Directions. Nutrients 2026, 18, 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18132206

AMA Style

Rao RV, Subramaniam KG, Gregory J, Bredesen AL, Coward C, Okada S, Kelly L, Bredesen DE. KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet and Cognitive Health: A Precision-Nutrition Perspective on Mechanisms, Emerging Evidence, and Future Directions. Nutrients. 2026; 18(13):2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18132206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rao, Rammohan V., Kaavya G. Subramaniam, Julie Gregory, Aida L. Bredesen, Christine Coward, Sho Okada, Lance Kelly, and Dale E. Bredesen. 2026. "KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet and Cognitive Health: A Precision-Nutrition Perspective on Mechanisms, Emerging Evidence, and Future Directions" Nutrients 18, no. 13: 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18132206

APA Style

Rao, R. V., Subramaniam, K. G., Gregory, J., Bredesen, A. L., Coward, C., Okada, S., Kelly, L., & Bredesen, D. E. (2026). KetoFLEX 12/3 Diet and Cognitive Health: A Precision-Nutrition Perspective on Mechanisms, Emerging Evidence, and Future Directions. Nutrients, 18(13), 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18132206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop