Next Article in Journal
A Narrative Review of Oral Hygiene and Pulmonary Health Amid Dysphagia: Implications for Feeding Route, Nutrition, and Quality of Life
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of 12-Week Sorghum Consumption on Visceral Fat Area and Metabolic Parameters in Japanese Adults: An Exploratory Single-Arm Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association Between Advanced Glycation End-Products and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Maria Patsiliva
1,
Aikaterini Theodorakopoulou
1,
Anastasia Stergioti
1,
Eleni Rebelos
1,2,
Evangelos Liberopoulos
1,
Ioanna A. Anastasiou
1,3,* and
Nikolaos Tentolouris
1,*
1
Diabetes Center, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2026, 18(12), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121887
Submission received: 15 May 2026 / Revised: 7 June 2026 / Accepted: 9 June 2026 / Published: 11 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Diabetes)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are implicated in the vascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although the Mediterranean diet (MD) confers well-recognized benefits, adherence among people with T2DM is moderate. Evidence regarding the relationship between adherence to the MD and AGEs remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the association between adherence to the MD and AGE levels in individuals with T2DM in Greece. Methods: Adults with T2DM were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Ocular and skin AGEs were assessed using autofluorescence techniques, while serum AGEs were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). MD adherence was scored with the Mediterranean Diet Score (MedDietScore) (range 0–55). Results: Sixty-one individuals were studied (mean age: 65 ± 9 years; 35 men). Median glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and MedDietScore were 6.95 (6.2–7.5)% and 29.0 (27.5–31.5), respectively. Higher adherence to the MD was more frequent among women (p = 0.019) and was associated with lower HbA1c levels (p = 0.002). MedDietScore was inversely correlated with HbA1c (ρ = −0.437, p < 0.001), ocular AGEs (ρ = −0.435, p = 0.013), and skin AGEs (ρ = −0.309, p = 0.033). In multivariable regression analyses, higher adherence to the MD was independently associated with lower ocular (p = 0.043) and skin AGEs (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Higher adherence to the MD was associated with female sex and lower HbA1c. MedDietScore was inversely related to skin, and ocular AGE levels in individuals with T2DM.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic condition in which circulating glucose remains elevated owing to inadequate insulin secretion, diminished insulin action, or both [1,2]. DM represents a major global health issue, as according to the International Diabetes Federation [IDF] Atlas, in 2024, approximately 589 million people, or 1 in 9 individuals aged 20–79 years, were living with the disease [3]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which accounts for 90–95% of cases worldwide, is the predominant form [1]. In Greece, the burden of diabetes is also considerable; based on IDF estimates, the prevalence of diabetes among Greek adults is 11.4% [3]. Notably, data from the Hellenic National Nutrition and Health Survey indicate a prevalence of 13.7% in adults aged over 60 years [4]. Although the pathophysiology of T2DM is complex, involving genetic, biological, behavioral, and social factors, the primary mechanisms include β-cell dysfunction, leading to progressive insulin deficiency, and insulin resistance [5,6]. T2DM causes vascular damage, resulting in microvascular and macrovascular complications that are associated with impaired quality of life and adverse clinical outcomes [7].
Although advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) form gradually as part of normal aging [8], chronic hyperglycemia significantly accelerates their generation, contributing to the development of diabetic complications [9]. Chemically, they comprise a diverse family of molecules produced via the Maillard reaction—a non-enzymatic, multi-step process in which reducing sugars react with the free amino groups of macromolecules, ultimately yielding the irreversible compounds collectively termed AGEs [10,11].
AGEs exert their effects through cross-linking with extracellular matrix proteins, altering tissue structure and function [10,12]. In addition, AGEs engage the receptor for AGEs (RAGE), triggering pro-inflammatory pathways and a rise in reactive oxygen species that drives oxidative stress [13,14].
Apart from endogenous formation, AGEs enter the body from exogenous sources, including tobacco smoke and diet. The Western dietary pattern and food processing methods constitute important sources of dietary AGEs [9,13,14]. Conversely, greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) has been linked to lower AGE concentrations [15]. The MD is also considered one of the most appropriate dietary patterns for diabetes management [16,17]. Its profile emphasizes plant-derived foods, including unrefined cereals, fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds, and extra virgin olive oil; moderate consumption of fish, low-fat dairy products, poultry, eggs, and wine; and a low consumption of red meat, processed foods, and added sugars [17,18,19,20,21]. Beyond this composition, MD adherence has been associated with lower oxidative stress and low-grade inflammation, improved insulin sensitivity, and better glycemic control. In addition, adherence to the MD has been linked to improved cardiovascular health, including a more favorable lipid profile, better blood pressure regulation, and improved indices of central adiposity [17,20,21,22,23,24,25].
Even though the MD’s benefits are well-established, adherence among individuals with T2DM is generally moderate, as reported in the systematic review by Ayoub et al. [26]. In the present study, adherence was classified as low, moderate, or high based on the MedDietScore tertiles (see Section 3.2). Moreover, evidence on the interplay between MD adherence and AGEs remains limited. Previous studies have shown an inverse relationship between adherence and skin AGEs both in middle-aged adults without known cardiovascular disease or T2DM (p = 0.026) [27], as well as in healthy populations (p < 0.05) [28]. In addition, following the MD pattern has also been tied to lower circulating AGE levels in the postprandial state [29]. In clinical populations, MD-related declines in circulating AGEs have accompanied T2DM remission among newly diagnosed patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) [30] and the preservation of kidney function in individuals with T2DM and CHD [31]. Furthermore, in individuals with T2DM in Croatia, AGE levels measured via skin autofluorescence (SAF) were inversely associated with MD adherence [32].
However, evidence regarding the simultaneous evaluation of tissue-bound and circulating AGEs and their association with MD adherence in individuals with T2DM remains scarce. Accordingly, the present study set out to examine how MD relates to skin, ocular, and serum AGEs among adults with T2DM in Athens, Greece. In addition, demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical characteristics were recorded.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

The study followed a cross-sectional design and took place at Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece, between April and December 2025. It adhered throughout to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [33]. The protocol received approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Approval Number: 5082/10-04-2025). Each participant gave written informed consent after being fully briefed on the study procedures.
Consecutive adults diagnosed with T2DM, according to the diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association [1], who were regular attendees of the outpatient Diabetes Clinic of the First Propaedeutic Department of the hospital, were eligible for the study.
Participants were ineligible if they had a non-T2DM form of diabetes, microvascular complications (nephropathy, neuropathy, or retinopathy) of non-diabetic etiology, advanced liver disease, severe peripheral arterial disease [ankle–brachial index (ABI) < 0.4], and severely reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Individuals with advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, pacemaker implantation, or a history of arrhythmia were also excluded. In addition, individuals with a history of ocular trauma, ocular surgery, glaucoma, or contact lens use, as well as those with malignancy, neurologic impairment, rheumatic, hematologic, or autoimmune diseases were excluded. The presence of fever at the time of assessment, a documented history of chronic excessive alcohol consumption (i.e., habitual heavy drinking or a recorded diagnosis of alcohol use disorder, based on the medical history), and current treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants were also considered exclusion criteria.

2.2. Study Procedures

All participants presented at the Diabetes Center of the hospital early in the morning. They were instructed to fast for 12 h, abstain from smoking, and take any medication after completion of the visit. The visit included an interview to collect information on demographic (e.g., sex, age) and behavioral characteristics (e.g., smoking habits). Diabetes-related parameters were obtained from the participants’ medical records by the study investigators, including disease duration, pharmacotherapy, and presence of microvascular or macrovascular complications. Information on comorbidities and additional treatment was also retrieved from their medical history.

2.2.1. Anthropometric Measurements

Trained staff carried out all anthropometric assessments. With participants in light clothing and without footwear, body weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a non-portable stadiometer and recorded in meters (m). Body mass index (BMI) was derived as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Participants were grouped into normal weight, overweight, and obese categories based on BMI (18.5–24.99 kg/m2, 25.0–29.99 kg/m2, and ≥30.0 kg/m2, respectively). Waist and hip circumferences were obtained with an inelastic tape [34], and the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were subsequently calculated as additional indices of central adiposity. WHR was calculated as waist circumference divided by hip circumference, and the WHtR as waist circumference divided by height [35,36].

2.2.2. Clinical Data

Fasting blood samples were obtained from every participant to measure glycemic, lipid, renal, and nutritional indices, including plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, serum creatinine, 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, ferritin, vitamin B12, and folate. Biochemical indices were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) on a COBAS analyzer (Cobas 6000, Roche Diagnostics International Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration was derived with the Friedewald equation [37,38], and eGFR with the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [39]. A morning spot urine sample was also collected from each participant and analyzed at the clinical laboratory of the hospital; the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was calculated as the ratio of urinary albumin to urinary creatinine.

2.2.3. Quantification of Circulating AGEs (n = 55)

To obtain serum, samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min, and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Serum AGE levels were quantified with a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a commercial ELISA kit (Human AGE ELISA Kit, EH0622, FineTest, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum AGE concentrations (ng/mL) were calculated based on the standard curve.

2.2.4. Assessment of Ocular AGEs (n = 32)

Ocular AGE accumulation was evaluated via lens autofluorescence (LAF) [40]. Measurements were performed on the left eye using the ClearPath DS-120® lens fluorescence biomicroscope optical system (Freedom Meditech, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). This is a non-invasive technique that does not require pupil dilation. During scanning of the eye, scattered and fluorescent light is recorded. The result represents the ratio of LAF to scattered light and is expressed in arbitrary units (AU) [40,41,42]. Lens crystallins are susceptible to AGE accumulation [40], and increased AGE accumulation leads to higher LAF values [43]. In individuals with T2DM, LAF tracks with disease duration and diabetes-related complications [41].

2.2.5. Assessment of Skin AGEs (n = 48)

Skin AGEs were measured using SAF with the AGE Reader device (DiagnOptics, Groningen, The Netherlands) [44]. SAF is a non-invasive, simple, and rapid method [45], that exploits the autofluorescence of AGEs bound to dermal tissue [46]. It has been suggested that SAF correlates with AGE levels in skin biopsies, which are considered the gold standard method [44,45,46]. The AGE Reader illuminates approximately 4 cm2 of skin on the inner forearm [44]. SAF is calculated based on the intensity of emitted and reflected light, expressed in AU, and displayed on the device screen [46]. SAF has been reported to be higher in individuals with diabetes [46], correlates with HbA1c levels [12], and may predict diabetes-related complications [44].

2.2.6. Assessment of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet

Dietary intake was assessed at enrollment through a face-to-face interview conducted by trained study investigators, in which the participants reported their usual weekly consumption of each food group over the preceding three months. Adherence was quantified with a modified Mediterranean Diet Score (MedDietScore) [47], adapted from the instrument originally devised by Panagiotakos et al. [48] and validated in Greek populations. In contrast to the original score, which evaluates the monthly consumption of the food groups, the modified version evaluates their weekly consumption, which was considered more representative of habitual intake. Portion sizes were defined according to the national dietary guidelines for adults in Greece [49]. Each of the eleven food groups is rated from 0 to 5: fruits, vegetables, legumes, unrefined cereals, potatoes, olive oil, fish, poultry, red meat and meat products, full-fat dairy products, and alcohol. For components consistent with the MD, higher consumption corresponds to higher scores, whereas for the remaining components, reverse scoring was applied. Alcohol intake was scored separately: a daily intake of <300 mL was assigned a score of 5, while intakes of 300, 400, 500, 600 and >700 mL/day were assigned scores of 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0, respectively. An intake of 0 mL/day was also assigned a score of 0. Total scores ranged from 0 to 55, with higher values denoting closer adherence [47].

2.2.7. Statistical Analysis

Analyses were conducted in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and graphical methods. Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), whereas the non-normally distributed variables are presented as median (interquartile range). Categorical variables are presented as absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies. Comparisons between two independent groups were performed using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) test was used for categorical variables. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to assess non-parametric correlations. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between adherence to the MD and AGE levels. Three separate models were constructed for ocular, skin, and serum AGEs as dependent variables. Covariates were selected on clinical grounds and according to the sample available for each AGE measure to avoid model overfitting. Multicollinearity among independent variables was assessed using variance inflation factor (VIF). Results are presented as standardized regression coefficients (β) and corresponding p-values. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

A total of 61 individuals with T2DM were included in this study (Figure 1). Of these, 35 (57.4%) were men, and the mean age was 65 ± 9 years. The median diabetes duration was 14.0 (7.25–23.0) years. With regard to glucose-lowering therapy, 50 participants (82.0%) were receiving metformin, 26 (42.6%) insulin, 34 (55.7%) sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, 12 (19.7%) dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and 35 (57.4%) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). In addition, 73.3% of the study population were non-smokers.
The mean waist and hip circumferences were 106.4 ± 10.6 cm and 103.4 ± 8.04 cm, respectively. The mean WHR was 1.03 ± 0.09, and the mean WHtR was 0.63 ± 0.07. The median BMI was 29.3 (26.5–33.6) kg/m2; 41.7% of participants fell within the overweight range and 40.0% within the obesity range.
Regarding laboratory parameters, the median fasting plasma glucose was 120.0 (105.0–147.0) mg/dL and the median HbA1c was 6.95 (6.2–7.5)%. Additional biochemical characteristics are presented in Table 1.

3.2. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet

The median MedDietScore was 29.0 (27.5–31.5). Based on tertiles of the MedDietScore distribution, MD adherence was classified as low, moderate, or high. Accordingly, 20 participants (32.8%) were classified as having low adherence (MedDietScore ≤ 28.0), 26 (42.6%) as having moderate adherence (29 ≤ MedDietScore ≤ 31.0), and 15 (24.6%) as having high adherence (MedDietScore > 31.0). For subsequent comparative analyses, the cohort was dichotomized at the median MedDietScore (≤29.0 vs. >29.0).

3.3. Sample Characteristics According to Median MedDietScore

Individuals with higher adherence to the MD were more frequently women (p = 0.019), more frequently treated with metformin (p = 0.024) and less frequently with insulin (p = 0.019), and exhibited higher BMI (p = 0.012), waist circumference (p = 0.023), and WHtR (p = 0.034), as well as lower HbA1c levels (p = 0.002). However, the associations observed for adiposity measures were not confirmed in subsequent correlation analyses.
A trend toward lower ocular AGEs was also observed in the higher adherence group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.071). Skin and serum AGEs did not differ between the two groups. The characteristics of participants according to MD adherence are presented in Table 2.

3.4. Associations Between MedDietScore and Demographic, Anthropometric, Clinical, and Biochemical Parameters

Spearman correlation analysis showed significant inverse correlations between MedDietScore and HbA1c (ρ = −0.437, p < 0.001), ocular AGEs (ρ = −0.435, p = 0.013), and skin AGEs (ρ = −0.309, p = 0.033). An inverse correlation was also observed between MD adherence and serum AGEs; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.060).
Detailed results are shown in Table 3.

3.5. Multivariable Analysis

Three multivariable linear regression models were constructed with AGEs as the dependent variables and MedDietScore as the main predictor, adjusting for selected covariates.
In the model predicting ocular AGEs (n = 32), higher MedDietScore remained independently associated with lower ocular AGE levels after adjusting for age and diabetes duration (β = −0.336, p = 0.043).
Similarly, in the model predicting skin AGEs (n = 48), higher adherence to the MD was independently associated with lower skin AGE levels after adjusting for age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, and smoking status (β = −0.387, p = 0.005).
In contrast, MedDietScore was not independently associated with serum AGEs (n = 55) after adjusting for age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, smoking status, and eGFR (β = −0.037, p = 0.823). The overall serum AGE regression model was not statistically significant (p = 0.352).
In sensitivity analyses additionally adjusting for metformin and insulin use, the inverse association between MedDietScore and skin AGEs remained significant (β = −0.346, p = 0.013, n = 47), and neither metformin (p = 0.173) nor insulin (p = 0.891) was independently associated with skin AGEs. For ocular AGEs, the standardized coefficient for MedDietScore was essentially unchanged (β = −0.338; n = 32) but reached only borderline significance (p = 0.057), with neither metformin (p = 0.391) nor insulin (p = 0.257) being an independent predictor.

4. Discussion

The present cross-sectional study extends the current literature by simultaneously assessing tissue-bound (skin and ocular) and circulating AGE levels and investigating their associations with adherence to the MD (scored with the MedDietScore) [47,48], in a sample of individuals with T2DM in Athens, Greece. Overall, adherence to the MD in this sample can be characterized as low to moderate. Higher adherence was associated with female sex and lower HbA1c, ocular AGE, and skin AGE levels. In contrast, serum AGEs were not significantly associated with MD adherence. Notably, ocular and skin AGEs remained independently and inversely associated with MD adherence in the multivariable regression models after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates.
The low-to-moderate adherence seen here aligns with reports from Mediterranean T2DM populations [26] and may reflect the gradual transition from traditional to more Westernized dietary patterns [26,50]. Similarly, studies in Greek populations, both in healthy individuals and in individuals with DM, have reported low to moderate adherence to the MD [50,51,52,53].
With regard to demographic characteristics, female sex was associated with higher MD adherence in univariate analyses. However, the available literature reports conflicting results in people with DM [26]. Nevertheless, data from specific cohorts are in agreement with our findings. For instance, in a prospective cohort from the ATTICA study, long-term MD adherence was associated with female sex [54]. Similarly, a study conducted in a healthy Italian population reported higher adherence among women [55]. In contrast, earlier data from Greek populations revealed no sex-related differences in MD adherence [50]. Despite these inconsistencies, both healthy individuals and those with DM appear to exhibit a greater tendency toward healthier dietary patterns among women [55,56].
Our cohort showed no significant link between age and MD adherence, although prior work points to a positive relationship, possibly reflecting a higher likelihood of consuming homemade meals among older individuals [26]. The relatively narrow age span of our participants may account for the null finding.
With regard to clinical parameters, no association was observed between diabetes duration and MD adherence in this study, while the available evidence remains inconclusive [26]. This finding may be explained by the relative homogeneity of the sample, as the median diabetes duration was approximately 14 years, as well as the relatively small sample size.
Among the biochemical parameters, HbA1c was inversely associated with MD adherence in the present sample. Similar findings have been reported in previous research supporting a favorable effect of the MD on glycemic control [24,57,58,59,60], including a recent study in adults with T2DM in Greece [53].
The MD’s favorable effect on glycemic regulation may be attributed to improvements in insulin sensitivity [59], reduced glycemic variability [15], and lower oxidative and inflammatory burden [25,61]. These actions probably arise from the diet’s makeup—rich in dietary fiber, vitamins (e.g., vitamin C), unsaturated fatty acids (found in extra virgin oil, fish, and nuts), and bioactive compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties (e.g., polyphenols, phytosterols, and carotenoids, found in fruit, vegetables, legumes, and cereals) [15,21,25,61]. In addition, adherence to the MD has been associated with enhanced GLP-1 activity and increased production of short-chain fatty acids, both of which are suggested to have a positive impact on satiety, insulin sensitivity, and pancreatic β-cell function [21,25].
A principal observation of this study is the marked inverse association between MD adherence and tissue-bound AGEs, as assessed via skin and lens autofluorescence. These associations remained significant after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. Importantly, these associations were not materially altered after additionally adjusting for metformin and insulin use, indicating that they were not explained by differences in glucose-lowering treatment between groups. The findings concur with earlier cross-sectional reports of an inverse MD-adherence–SAF relationship in T2DM individuals in Croatia [32], healthy individuals aged 18–30 years [28], and middle-aged individuals without known cardiovascular disease or T2DM [27].
This relationship may be mediated through several biological mechanisms. The antiglycation effects of the MD may, in part, be attributed to its low content of dietary AGEs [15]. Evidence from dietary AGE databases suggests that the AGE intake can be substantially reduced by increasing the consumption of fruit, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, fish, and low-fat dairy products, while lowering the consumption of red meat, solid fats, and processed foods [62]. These dietary characteristics are all consistent with the MD [17,18,20].
The MD may also protect against glycation by reducing endogenous AGE formation. Its high content of dietary fiber and unrefined cereals may slow intestinal glucose absorption, thereby lowering both glucose levels and glycemic variability. Additionally, phenolic compounds present in foods typical of the MD act as electron donors, contributing to the reduction in free radicals and oxidative stress. The use of olive oil as the primary fat source is associated with a higher intake of monounsaturated fatty acids, which play an important role in attenuating inflammatory processes. In parallel, the MD has been associated with the upregulation of protective genes, such as receptor for advanced glycation end-products type 1 (AGER1) and glyoxalase I (GloxI), and the downregulation of genes involved in AGE-related damage, such as RAGE, thereby contributing to reduced endogenous AGE production [15,21,25].
By contrast, serum AGEs showed no significant association with MD adherence. Nevertheless, existing evidence supports an inverse relationship between MD adherence and circulating AGEs. Specifically, intervention trials have reported MD-induced reductions in circulating AGEs, both in healthy individuals and in individuals with CHD and T2DM [29,30,31].
One reason for the absent serum-AGE association may be that circulating AGEs are more susceptible to acute metabolic changes, such as those occurring in the postprandial state. Furthermore, in individuals with DM, impaired kidney function may limit the renal clearance of AGEs [13,45], although no association was observed between eGFR and serum AGEs in the present study.
In contrast, proteins in tissues, such as skin collagen, nerve myelin, and lens crystallins are characterized by slow turnover, making them more prone to AGE accumulation [40,44]. As a result, circulating AGE levels may not accurately reflect overall AGE accumulation in the body, supporting the use of tissue-bound AGEs as markers of long-term glycation [44,45].
Collectively, these observations suggest that the stronger associations observed with tissue AGEs may better reflect the long-term impact of dietary habits on glycation and oxidative burden.
The present findings have clinical implications, supporting the potential role of the MD in improving glycemic control and lowering glycation burden in individuals with T2DM. Given the involvement of AGEs in diabetes-related complications, the observed association between higher MD adherence and lower tissue AGE accumulation may indicate a broader beneficial effect of this dietary pattern on metabolic and vascular health. Hyperglycemia promotes oxidative stress, inflammation, and the production of AGEs, all of which can contribute to insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction [63]. These findings support the MD as a potentially useful non-pharmacological approach within diabetes management. In addition, since AGE formation is strongly influenced by chronic hyperglycemia [9], it is plausible that the positive impact of the MD on AGEs is, at least partly, mediated through improved glycemic control.
A key strength is the study’s novelty: skin, ocular, and serum AGEs were simultaneously assessed in relation to MD adherence for the first time. Moreover, the study provides novel data on the relationship between MD adherence and AGE levels in individuals with T2DM in Greece. Furthermore, the current findings contribute to the existing literature on the determinants of MD adherence in this clinical population. The use of a validated dietary assessment score [47], along with simple and non-invasive techniques for the evaluation of AGEs [45] enhances the reliability and applicability of the results. Finally, the inclusion of multiple regression models allowed for the identification of independent associations between MD adherence and tissue-bound AGEs.
Several limitations warrant mention. The cross-sectional design rules out causal inference, and the modest sample size may have constrained statistical power. Relatedly, the treatment-adjusted models were based on modest sample sizes (n = 47 for skin AGEs and n = 32 for ocular AGEs); the limited statistical power, particularly for the smaller ocular subset, likely explains why the ocular association became borderline after additionally adjusting for metformin and insulin. Sample homogeneity and the lack of a control group may further constrain the interpretation of the findings and the identification of potential determinants. Reliance on a dietary assessment index may also introduce recall bias. Finally, although key variables were included in the regression models, residual confounding cannot be excluded. In particular, dietary AGE intake, which may influence AGE levels, was not directly assessed in this study.
Future studies with larger samples and longitudinal designs are needed to allow for causal inference regarding the relationship between MD adherence and AGEs. Further investigation is warranted to examine the factors that may hinder higher adherence to the MD in this clinical population, given its established benefits in disease management.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, in this sample of individuals with T2DM in Greece, adherence to the MD was low to moderate. Higher adherence was associated with female sex and lower HbA1c levels. In addition, MD adherence was independently and inversely associated with tissue-bound AGEs, as assessed by SAF and LAF. No significant association was observed with circulating AGEs. These findings support the role of the MD as part of a comprehensive strategy for the prevention and management of diabetes-related complications, particularly through its association with improved glycemic control and lower tissue AGE accumulation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and clarify potential causal relationships.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and I.A.A.; methodology, M.P., I.A.A. and N.T.; validation, M.P., A.T. and I.A.A.; formal analysis, M.P.; investigation, M.P., A.T., A.S. and I.A.A.; resources, N.T.; data curation, M.P., A.T. and I.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P.; writing—review and editing, I.A.A., E.R. and N.T.; visualization, M.P.; supervision, I.A.A., E.R., E.L. and N.T.; project administration, I.A.A. and N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Approval Number: 5082/10-04-2025, approved on 4 October 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ABIAnkle–brachial index
ACRAlbumin-to-creatinine ratio
AGER1Receptor for advanced glycation end-products type 1
AGEsAdvanced glycation end-products
AUArbitrary unit
BMIBody mass index
CHDCoronary heart disease
CKD-EPIChronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
DMDiabetes mellitus
DPP-4Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4
eGFREstimated glomerular filtration rate
ELISAEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Glox1Glyoxalase 1
GLP-1 RAGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist
HbA1cGlycated hemoglobin
HDLHigh-density lipoprotein
IDFInternational Diabetes Federation
LAFLens autofluorescence
LDLLow-density lipoprotein
MDMediterranean diet
MedDietScoreMediterranean Diet Score
RAGEReceptor for advanced glycation end-products
SAFSkin autofluorescence
SDStandard deviation
SGLT-2Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2
SPSSStatistical Package for the Social Sciences
T2DMType 2 diabetes mellitus
VIFVariance inflation factor
WHRWaist-to-hip ratio
WHtRWaist-to-height ratio

References

  1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care 2026, 49, S27–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 11th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  4. Magriplis, E.; Panagiotakos, D.; Papakonstantinou, E.; Mitsopoulou, A.-V.; Karageorgou, D.; Dimakopoulos, I.; Bakogianni, I.; Chourdakis, M.; Micha, R.; Michas, G.; et al. Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Representative Sample of Greek Adults and Its Association with Modifiable Risk Factors: Results from the Hellenic National Nutrition and Health Survey. Public Health 2021, 197, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Młynarska, E.; Czarnik, W.; Dzieża, N.; Jędraszak, W.; Majchrowicz, G.; Prusinowski, F.; Stabrawa, M.; Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: New Pathogenetic Mechanisms, Treatment and the Most Important Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Davies, M.J.; Lim, S.; Slater, T.; Goldney, J.; Philis-Tsimikas, A.; Franco, D.R.; Lamptey, R.; Yates, T.; Tankova, T.; Lingvay, I. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2026, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Iwasaki, H.; Yagyu, H.; Shimano, H. A Comprehensive Analysis of Diabetic Complications and Advances in Management Strategies. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2025, 32, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rungratanawanich, W.; Qu, Y.; Wang, X.; Essa, M.M.; Song, B.-J. Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) and Other Adducts in Aging-Related Diseases and Alcohol-Mediated Tissue Injury. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 168–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Khalid, M.; Petroianu, G.; Adem, A. Advanced Glycation End Products and Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Twarda-Clapa, A.; Olczak, A.; Białkowska, A.M.; Koziołkiewicz, M. Advanced Glycation End-Products (AGEs): Formation, Chemistry, Classification, Receptors, and Diseases Related to AGEs. Cells 2022, 11, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tu, C.; Chen, X.; He, R. Advanced Glycation End Products in Disease Development and Potential Interventions. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Klonoff, D.C.; Aaron, R.E.; Tian, T.; DuNova, A.Y.; Pandey, A.; Rhee, C.; Fleming, G.A.; Sacks, D.B.; Pop-Busui, R.; Kerr, D. Advanced Glycation Endproducts: A Marker of Long-Term Exposure to Glycemia. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2024, 19, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zgutka, K.; Tkacz, M.; Tomasiak, P.; Tarnowski, M. A Role for Advanced Glycation End Products in Molecular Ageing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Anastasiou, I.A.; Tentolouris, K.N.; Lambadiari, V.; Eleftheriadou, I.; Tektonidou, M.; Tentolouris, N. Effects of Advanced Glycation End Products via Oxidative Stress on Beta Cells: Insights from in Vitro and in Vivo Studies and Update on Emerging Therapies. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2023, 23, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oliveira, J.S.; da Silva, J.A.; de Freitas, B.V.M.; Alfenas, R.C.G.; Bressan, J. A Mediterranean Diet Improves Glycation Markers in Healthy People and in Those with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Nutr. Rev. 2025, 83, e317–e331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-Being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care 2025, 49, S89–S131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Evidence-Based European Recommendations for the Dietary Management of Diabetes. Diabetologia 2023, 66, 965–985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Whiteley, C.; Benton, F.; Matwiejczyk, L.; Luscombe-Marsh, N. Determining Dietary Patterns to Recommend for Type 2 Diabetes: An Umbrella Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Minari, T.P.; Tácito, L.H.B.; Yugar, L.B.T.; Ferreira-Melo, S.E.; Manzano, C.F.; Pires, A.C.; Moreno, H.; Vilela-Martin, J.F.; Cosenso-Martin, L.N.; Yugar-Toledo, J.C. Nutritional Strategies for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Evert, A.B.; Dennison, M.; Gardner, C.D.; Garvey, W.T.; Lau, K.H.K.; MacLeod, J.; Mitri, J.; Pereira, R.F.; Rawlings, K.; Robinson, S.; et al. Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 731–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Martín-Peláez, S.; Fito, M.; Castaner, O. Mediterranean Diet Effects on Type 2 Diabetes Prevention, Disease Progression, and Related Mechanisms. A Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Scaglione, S.; Di Chiara, T.; Daidone, M.; Tuttolomondo, A. Effects of the Mediterranean Diet on the Components of Metabolic Syndrome Concerning the Cardiometabolic Risk. Nutrients 2025, 17, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Milenkovic, T.; Bozhinovska, N.; Macut, D.; Bjekic-Macut, J.; Rahelic, D.; Velija Asimi, Z.; Burekovic, A. Mediterranean Diet and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Perpetual Inspiration for the Scientific World. A Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huo, R.; Du, T.; Xu, Y.; Xu, W.; Chen, X.; Sun, K.; Yu, X. Effects of Mediterranean-Style Diet on Glycemic Control, Weight Loss and Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Type 2 Diabetes Individuals: A Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 69, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Caturano, A.; D’Angelo, M.; Mormone, A.; Russo, V.; Mollica, M.P.; Salvatore, T.; Galiero, R.; Rinaldi, L.; Vetrano, E.; Marfella, R.; et al. Oxidative Stress in Type 2 Diabetes: Impacts from Pathogenesis to Lifestyle Modifications. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 6651–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ayoub, J.J.; Haidar, S.A.; Blaak, E.E.; De Vries, N.K. Determinants of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Living in Mediterranean Countries: A Systematic Review. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1523995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sánchez, E.; Betriu, À.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Pamplona, R.; Barbé, F.; Purroy, F.; Farràs, C.; Fernández, E.; López-Cano, C.; Mizab, C.; et al. Mediterranean Diet, Physical Activity and Subcutaneous Advanced Glycation End-Products’ Accumulation: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the ILERVAS Project. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 59, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Erim, B.; Temel Pekmez, Y.E.; Kaçar, Z.; Ergene, E. Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Cardiovascular Risk: Exploring the Role of Advanced Glycation End-Products via Skin Autofluorescence Analysis. Nutr. Hosp. 2025, 42, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lopez-Moreno, J.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Delgado-Lista, J.; Garcia-Rios, A.; Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Gomez-Delgado, F.; Camargo, A.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Tinahones, F.J.; Striker, G.E.; et al. Mediterranean Diet Supplemented With Coenzyme Q10 Modulates the Postprandial Metabolism of Advanced Glycation End Products in Elderly Men and Women. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2016, 73, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gutierrez-Mariscal, F.M.; Cardelo, M.P.; de la Cruz, S.; Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Roncero-Ramos, I.; Guler, I.; Vals-Delgado, C.; López-Moreno, A.; Luque, R.M.; Delgado-Lista, J.; et al. Reduction in Circulating Advanced Glycation End Products by Mediterranean Diet Is Associated with Increased Likelihood of Type 2 Diabetes Remission in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: From the Cordioprev Study. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, e1901290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gutierrez-Mariscal, F.M.; Podadera-Herreros, A.; Alcalá-Diaz, J.F.; Cardelo, M.P.; Arenas-de Larriva, A.P.; de la Cruz-Ares, S.; Torres-Peña, J.D.; Luque, R.M.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Delgado-Lista, J.; et al. Reduction of Circulating Methylglyoxal Levels by a Mediterranean Diet Is Associated with Preserved Kidney Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease: From the CORDIOPREV Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Metab. 2024, 50, 101503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grahovac, M.; Kumric, M.; Vilovic, M.; Martinovic, D.; Kreso, A.; Ticinovic Kurir, T.; Vrdoljak, J.; Prizmic, K.; Božić, J. Adherence to Mediterranean Diet and Advanced Glycation Endproducts in Patients with Diabetes. World J. Diabetes 2021, 12, 1942–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. World Health Organization (Ed.) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation; WHO Technical Report Series; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ashwell, M.; Gibson, S. Waist-to-Height Ratio as an Indicator of “Early Health Risk”: Simpler and More Predictive than Using a “matrix” Based on BMI and Waist Circumference. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  37. Knopfholz, J.; Disserol, C.C.D.; Pierin, A.J.; Schirr, F.L.; Streisky, L.; Takito, L.L.; Massucheto Ledesma, P.; Faria-Neto, J.R.; Olandoski, M.; da Cunha, C.L.P.; et al. Validation of the Friedewald Formula in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Cholesterol 2014, 2014, 261878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Friedewald, W.T.; Levy, R.I.; Fredrickson, D.S. Estimation of the Concentration of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Plasma, without Use of the Preparative Ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 1972, 18, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Inker, L.A.; Eneanya, N.D.; Coresh, J.; Tighiouart, H.; Wang, D.; Sang, Y.; Crews, D.C.; Doria, A.; Estrella, M.M.; Froissart, M.; et al. New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1737–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Burd, J.; Lum, S.; Cahn, F.; Ignotz, K. Simultaneous Noninvasive Clinical Measurement of Lens Autofluorescence and Rayleigh Scattering Using a Fluorescence Biomicroscope. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6, 1251–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cahn, F.; Burd, J.; Ignotz, K.; Mishra, S. Measurement of Lens Autofluorescence Can Distinguish Subjects With Diabetes From Those Without. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014, 8, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sertbas, M.; Sertbas, Y.; Uner, O.E.; Elarslan, S.; Okuroglu, N.; Ak, F.; Dayan, A.; Ozdemir, A. Lens Autofluorescence Ratio as a Noninvasive Marker of Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2019, 129, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pehlivanoğlu, S.; Acar, N.; Albayrak, S.; Karakaya, M.; Ofluoğlu, A. The Assessment of Autofluorescence of the Crystalline Lens in Diabetic Patients and Healthy Controls: Can It Be Used as a Screening Test? Clin. Ophthalmol. 2018, 12, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stirban, A.; Heinemann, L. Skin Autofluorescence—A Non-Invasive Measurement for Assessing Cardiovascular Risk and Risk of Diabetes. Eur. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Corica, D.; Pepe, G.; Currò, M.; Aversa, T.; Tropeano, A.; Ientile, R.; Wasniewska, M. Methods to Investigate Advanced Glycation End-Product and Their Application in Clinical Practice. Methods 2022, 203, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. van Waateringe, R.P.; Fokkens, B.T.; Slagter, S.N.; van der Klauw, M.M.; van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, J.V.; Graaff, R.; Paterson, A.D.; Smit, A.J.; Lutgers, H.L.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H.R. Skin Autofluorescence Predicts Incident Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in the General Population. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Panagiotakos, D.B.; Pitsavos, C.; Arvaniti, F.; Stefanadis, C. Adherence to the Mediterranean Food Pattern Predicts the Prevalence of Hypertension, Hypercholesterolemia, Diabetes and Obesity, among Healthy Adults; the Accuracy of the MedDietScore. Prev. Med. 2007, 44, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Panagiotakos, D.B.; Pitsavos, C.; Stefanadis, C. Dietary Patterns: A Mediterranean Diet Score and Its Relation to Clinical and Biological Markers of Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. NMCD 2006, 16, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Supreme Scientific Health Council, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Dietary guidelines for adults in Greece. Arch. Hell. Med. 1999, 16, 516–524. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kyriacou, A.; Evans, J.M.M.; Economides, N.; Kyriacou, A. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet by the Greek and Cypriot Population: A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Public Health 2015, 25, 1012–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kontele, I.; Panagiotakos, D.; Yannakoulia, M.; Vassilakou, T. Socio-Demographic Determinants of Mediterranean Diet Adherence: Results of the EU-National Health Interview Survey (EHIS-3). J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2025, 38, e70023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Panagiotakos, D.B.; Tzima, N.; Pitsavos, C.; Chrysohoou, C.; Zampelas, A.; Toussoulis, D.; Stefanadis, C. The Association between Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Fasting Indices of Glucose Homoeostasis: The ATTICA Study. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2007, 26, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vavitis, A.; Anastasiou, I.A.; Kounatidis, D.; Rebelos, E.; Tentolouris, N. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Is a Strong Predictor of Glycemic and Lipidemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: An Observational Study from a Tertiary Hospital in Greece. Nutrients 2026, 18, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kechagia, I.; Tsiampalis, T.; Damigou, E.; Barkas, F.; Anastasiou, G.; Kravvariti, E.; Liberopoulos, E.; Sfikakis, P.P.; Chrysohoou, C.; Tsioufis, C.; et al. Long-Term Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Reduces 20-Year Diabetes Incidence: The ATTICA Cohort Study (2002–2022). Metabolites 2024, 14, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barrea, L.; Verde, L.; Suárez, R.; Frias-Toral, E.; Vásquez, C.A.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S.; Muscogiuri, G. Sex-Differences in Mediterranean Diet: A Key Piece to Explain Sex-Related Cardiovascular Risk in Obesity? A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alcubierre, N.; Granado-Casas, M.; Real, J.; Perpiñán, H.; Rubinat, E.; Falguera, M.; Castelblanco, E.; Franch-Nadal, J.; Mauricio, D. Spanish People with Type 2 Diabetes Show an Improved Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. Nutrients 2020, 12, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Esposito, K.; Maiorino, M.I.; Bellastella, G.; Chiodini, P.; Panagiotakos, D.; Giugliano, D. A Journey into a Mediterranean Diet and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e008222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Celada Roldan, C.; Tarraga Marcos, M.L.; Madrona Marcos, F.; Solera Albero, J.; Salmeron Rios, R.; Celada Rodriguez, A.; Panisello Royo, J.M.; Tárraga López, P.J. Adhesion to the Mediterranean Diet in Diabetic Patients with Poor Control. Clin. Investig. Arterioscler. 2019, 31, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zheng, X.; Zhang, W.; Wan, X.; Lv, X.; Lin, P.; Si, S.; Xue, F.; Wang, A.; Cao, Y. The Effects of Mediterranean Diet on Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Glycemic Control and Weight Loss in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Nutr. 2024, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ajala, O.; English, P.; Pinkney, J. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Different Dietary Approaches to the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Esposito, K.; Maiorino, M.I.; Bellastella, G.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Giugliano, D. Mediterranean Diet for Type 2 Diabetes: Cardiometabolic Benefits. Endocrine 2017, 56, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Uribarri, J.; Woodruff, S.; Goodman, S.; Cai, W.; Chen, X.; Pyzik, R.; Yong, A.; Striker, G.E.; Vlassara, H. Advanced Glycation End Products in Foods and a Practical Guide to Their Reduction in the Diet. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 911–916.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Galicia-Garcia, U.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Jebari, S.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Siddiqi, H.; Uribe, K.B.; Ostolaza, H.; Martín, C. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participant inclusion and exclusion. eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participant inclusion and exclusion. eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Nutrients 18 01887 g001
Table 1. Baseline biochemical characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Baseline biochemical characteristics of the study population.
ParameterValueReference Range
Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)120.0 (105.0–147.0)70–100
HbA1c (%)6.95 (6.2–7.5)4.8–6.0
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)137.5 (110.0–156.3)140–200
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)60.0 (45.9–85.3)<100
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)46.6 (39.9–54.2)<40.0 (low)/>60.0 (high)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)111.0 (75.8–166.5)50–150
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)92.0 (67.5–99.8)≥90.0
ACR (mg/g)18.0 (5.1–77.8)<30.0
25-hydroxy-vitamin D (ng/mL)20.3 (15.1–28.2)>30 (sufficiency)
Ferritin (ng/mL)56.5 (24.1–123.0)15–150
Vitamin B12 (pg/mL)363.0 (295.0–443.0)223–925
Folate (ng/mL)7.2 (4.5–8.9)3.98–26.8
Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range). Reference ranges correspond to those of the clinical laboratory of the hospital. ACR: Albumin-to-creatinine ratio; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein.
Table 2. Characteristics of participants according to adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
Table 2. Characteristics of participants according to adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
VariableMedDietScore ≤ 29.0 (n = 34)MedDietScore > 29.0 (n = 27)p-Value
Female sex, n (%)10 (29.4)16 (59.3)0.019 *
Age (years)65.0 ± 10.366.0 ± 7.30.672
Diabetes duration (years)14.8 ± 9.1615.4 ± 8.630.804
Glucose-lowering medication, n (%)
Metformin24 (70.6)26 (96.3)0.024 *
Insulin19 (55.9)7 (25.9)0.019 *
SGLT-2 inhibitors20 (58.8)14 (51.9)0.586 *
DPP-4 inhibitors5 (14.7)7 (25.9)0.274 *
GLP-1 RA21 (61.8)14 (51.9)0.437 *
Current smoking status, yes, n (%)10 (29.4)6 (22.2)0.582 *
BMI (kg/m2)28.5 (25.4–30.1)32.2 (28.2–35.3)0.012 #
Waist circumference (cm)104.0 (97.0–109.0)111.0 (104.0–113.0)0.023 #
Hip circumference (cm)102.3 ± 9.32104.8 ± 6.150.327
WHR1.02 (0.94–1.05)1.06 (0.98–1.09)0.147 #
WHtR0.61 ± 0.070.66 ± 0.070.034 
HbA1c (%)7.3 (6.45–8.45)6.5 (5.9–7.1)0.002 #
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)91.0 (64.5–100.5)93.0 (77.2–99.0)0.694 #
Ocular AGEs (AU)0.26 ± 0.060.22 ± 0.050.071
Skin AGEs (AU)3.0 (2.7–4.0)2.8 (2.4–3.3)0.131 #
Serum AGEs (ng/mL)37.7 (24.7–80.7)27.6 (20.8–49.4)0.107 #
Categorical variables are presented as absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. p-values were calculated using Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical values and Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. Values shown in bold are statistically significant (p < 0.05). * Pearson’s chi-square test. Student’s t-test. # Mann–Whitney U test. Reference values: HbA1c: 4.8–6.0%, eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. No established reference values exist for ocular, skin, and serum AGEs. AGEs: Advanced glycation end-products; AU: arbitrary units; BMI: body mass index; DPP-4: dipeptidyl-peptidase 4; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1 RA: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; SGLT-2: sodium–glucose cotransporter-2; WHR: waist-to-hip ratio; WHtR: waist-to-height ratio.
Table 3. Correlations of MedDietScore with demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical characteristics.
Table 3. Correlations of MedDietScore with demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical characteristics.
Parameterρ (Spearman)p-Value
Sex (0 = male; 1 = female)0.2480.054
Age (years)0.0850.516
Diabetes duration (years)0.0350.793
Current smoking status (0 = no; 1 = yes)−0.0870.510
BMI (kg/m2)0.1850.156
Waist circumference (cm)0.1360.366
WHR0.1540.319
WHtR0.1830.225
HbA1c (%)−0.437<0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)0.0470.722
Ocular AGEs (AU)−0.4350.013
Skin AGEs (AU)−0.3090.033
Serum AGEs (ng/mL)−0.2550.060
ρ = Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Values shown in bold are statistically significant (p < 0.05). AGEs: Advanced glycation end-products; AU: arbitrary units; BMI: body mass index; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; WHR: waist-to-hip ratio; WHtR: waist-to-height ratio.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patsiliva, M.; Theodorakopoulou, A.; Stergioti, A.; Rebelos, E.; Liberopoulos, E.; Anastasiou, I.A.; Tentolouris, N. Association Between Advanced Glycation End-Products and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2026, 18, 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121887

AMA Style

Patsiliva M, Theodorakopoulou A, Stergioti A, Rebelos E, Liberopoulos E, Anastasiou IA, Tentolouris N. Association Between Advanced Glycation End-Products and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients. 2026; 18(12):1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patsiliva, Maria, Aikaterini Theodorakopoulou, Anastasia Stergioti, Eleni Rebelos, Evangelos Liberopoulos, Ioanna A. Anastasiou, and Nikolaos Tentolouris. 2026. "Association Between Advanced Glycation End-Products and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study" Nutrients 18, no. 12: 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121887

APA Style

Patsiliva, M., Theodorakopoulou, A., Stergioti, A., Rebelos, E., Liberopoulos, E., Anastasiou, I. A., & Tentolouris, N. (2026). Association Between Advanced Glycation End-Products and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients, 18(12), 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop