Supervised 16-Week Multicomponent Exercise Training Programme for 18–55-Year-Old People Living with and Beyond Cancer—CONSORT 2025-Based Study Protocol of the Pilot Onco-Move Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Protocol Registration
2.2. Study Setting
2.3. Study Design
2.4. Recruitment
2.5. Eligibility Criteria
2.6. Sample Size
2.7. Randomization
2.8. Blinding
2.9. Assessment Protocol
2.10. Outcomes
- HRQOL will be assessed pre-, during, and post-intervention and at follow-up using a validated questionnaire: EORTC QLQ-C30 [17]. This instrument measures general quality of life and includes multiple subscales (e.g., physical, emotional, cognitive functioning). Scores on each scale range from 0 to 100. For functional scales and global health status, higher scores indicate better functioning or QoL. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The validated Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 will be used. Data will be collected via digital or paper formats and analyzed.
- Other quality-of-life (QoL) variables—Other QoL-related variables will be assessed pre-, during, and post-intervention and at follow-up using validated questionnaires. Scores will be calculated per standard procedures. Data will be collected via digital or paper formats and analyzed. Tools include the following: (A) Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) [18]—This is a 19-item validated questionnaire measuring female sexual function across six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Scores range from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. (B) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) [19]—This is a 15-item questionnaire assessing male sexual function, including erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Scores range from 5 to 75, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. (C) UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL) [20]—The questionnaire measures three mood dimensions: tense arousal, energetic arousal, and hedonic tone. Scores vary by subscale; higher scores indicate greater presence of the respective mood state. (D) The Feeling of Stress Questionnaire (KPS) [21]—The tool assesses perceived psychosocial stress across domains such as work and emotional strain. Scores vary by domain; higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. (E) Patient Health Questionnaire For Anxiety And Depression (PHQ-9) [22]—This is a 9-item screening tool with two items each for anxiety and depression. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. (F) NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) [23]—This assesses five personality traits: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Each trait is scored separately; higher scores indicate stronger presence of the trait. (G) State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [24]—This includes two 20-item subscales measuring state anxiety (temporary) and trait anxiety (long-term). Scores range from 20 to 80 per subscale, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. All questionnaires will be administered in their validated Polish-language versions.
- Adherence to the Mediterranean diet—Adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern will be assessed using the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), originally developed and validated in the PREDIMED trial [25]. This questionnaire evaluates the frequency of consumption of key food components characteristic of the Mediterranean diet, such as olive oil, fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, fish, wine, and limits on red meat and processed foods.
- Body composition—This will be measured using a bioimpedance analyzer (InBody 720, InBody Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea), including weight (kg), body fat (%), fat mass (kg), fat-free mass (kg), bone mass (kg) intra-extracellular water (L), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), among others. Body composition will be assessed using the InBody 720 bioimpedance analyzer [26]. The participants will be asked to fast for at least 2 h and to urinate before the assessment. Measurements will be taken at baseline, during and post-intervention, and at follow-up to evaluate physiological changes related to the intervention.
- Self-reported physical fitness (IFIS)—The International Fitness Scale (IFIS) [27] is a subjective self-assessment tool for evaluating perceived physical fitness.
- Physical activity objectives—Participants’ motivation for participating in the project will be measured by the Inventory of Physical Activity Objectives (IPAO) [28]. IPAO contains four scales of goal-oriented behaviours associated with physical activity (PA): (1) motivational value, (2) time management, (3) persistence in action, and (4) motivational conflict.
- Physical function—This will be evaluated using two adapted fitness test batteries: the Senior Fitness Test (SFT) [29] and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) [30], tailored to the needs and limitations of the participants. From the SFT, we will measure key aspects of physical fitness relevant to daily activities: lower limb strength (chair rise test), upper limb strength (arm curl test), and aerobic capacity (6 min walk). The SPPB will include lower limb strength (chair stand test). Both test sets help monitor changes in physical fitness, assess fall risk, and guide rehabilitation planning. Additionally, we will test the walking speed (fast) by a 10-Metre Fast Walking Test (10MWT). Measurements will be taken at baseline, during and post-intervention, and at follow-up.
- Postural stability and balance control—Balance and postural stability will be assessed using the BIODEX Stabilometric Platform (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc., Shirley, NY, USA) [31]. This device objectively measures static and dynamic balance, overall stability, and controlled mobility. Measurements will be taken at baseline, during and post-intervention, and at follow-up to monitor changes in postural control and balance performance. Participants will stand barefoot on a platform so that their centre of gravity is positioned in the centre of the platform. The researcher will record the participant’s foot position and will conduct four types of tests: on a stable surface and on a moving surface, with open and closed eyes. After all the measurements are completed, a report of the conducted test will be generated.
- Neuromuscular function (isokinetic dynamometry)—Neuromuscular performance will be evaluated using the Biodex System 4 Pro (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc., Shirley, NY, USA) [32], an advanced dynamometric system for assessing and training muscle function under various contraction modes. The device allows for testing in isometric, isotonic (concentric and eccentric), isokinetic (concentric and eccentric), reactive eccentric, and passive motion conditions. It provides objective data on muscle strength, endurance, and control, with full data archiving and export capabilities for statistical analysis. Measurements will be conducted at baseline, during and post-intervention, and at follow-up to detect changes in neuromuscular function over time. Participants will sit on a specialized chair. The limb being tested will be secured in a movable panel connected to a dynamometer measuring force. Participants will be instructed on the direction of movement, after which they will perform several trial repetitions. During the protocol, data will be acquired by the device and displayed on the monitor screen. Isokinetic neuromuscular assessment using the Biodex system will be conducted only in participants without specific contraindications. Exclusion criteria for this assessment include known or suspected bone metastases, presence of central venous catheters (e.g., PICC lines), recent surgery affecting the tested limb, acute treatment-related complications, or any medical contraindication identified by the treating oncologist. Participants meeting these criteria will be excluded from isokinetic testing while remaining eligible for other study assessments.
- Cardiopulmonary fitness (ergospirometry)—Cardiopulmonary capacity will be evaluated using a Vyntus CPX (Vyaire Medical, Inc., Mettawa, IL, USA) [33], which analyzes exhaled gases during exercise to assess respiratory and circulatory function. Key parameters measured include maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max), peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), ventilatory response to exercise (VE/VCO2 slope), and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER = VCO2/VO2), which is useful for evaluating anaerobic metabolism during exercise. These measurements will be taken on a cycle ergometer at baseline, during and post-intervention, and at follow-up to assess improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness. The participants will be asked to avoid caffeine before the test. During the test, participants exert themselves with increasing intensity, and respiratory and metabolic parameters are monitored and recorded. The protocol for the incremental test on the cycle ergometer will include familiarization with the equipment (minutes 0–3); warm-up at 0.5 W/kg (minutes 3–6); from minute 6 onward, an increase of +0.25 W/kg per minute; and a cool-down period (last 3 min).
- Blood lactate levels—Blood lactate concentration will be measured using the Lactate Scout 4 system (EKF Diagnostics GmbH, Barleben, Germany) [34]. This device is designed for assessing lactate levels in capillary blood, providing insights into changes in physical fitness and endurance. Measurements will be taken at baseline and post-intervention to evaluate improvements in physical performance and metabolic response during exercise. Lactate levels will be measured via an ear prick during the exercise test. A baseline assessment will be performed before the start of the test, and then levels will be checked at the 5th minute 1 min into the cool-down, and 5 min after the end (lactate levels will be tested four times during each test).
- Grip strength—Grip strength will be measured using a SAEHAN electronic dynamometer (Saehan Corporation, Changwon, Republic of Korea) [35]. This device evaluates handgrip strength by measuring grip force in an isometric test. The dynamometer features a five-level adjustable grip (ranging from 3.4 cm to 8.5 cm) to accommodate different hand sizes. The measurements will be taken at baseline, during and post-intervention, and at follow-up to track changes in muscle strength and hand function. Participants will squeeze the dynamometer according to the instructions provided by the researcher.
- Biochemical markers—Biochemical markers will be measured from participants’ blood at baseline and post-intervention. The markers include IL-6 (Interleukin-6), IL-15 (Interleukin-15), Irisin, BDNF (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor), SPARC (Secreted Protein, Acidic, and Rich in Cysteine), and Decorin. These biomarkers will provide insights into the participants’ inflammatory, metabolic, and muscular responses to the intervention, allowing for the assessment of physiological changes related to the intervention.
- Genetic analyses will be conducted using participants’ blood samples collected at baseline. The analysis will include polymorphisms located in the following genes: ACE, ACTN3, PPARGC1A, BDNF, VEGF, IL6, NOS3, HIF1A, TNF-α, and mTOR pathway. These genetic markers will help evaluate individual variability in response to the intervention and provide insights into genetic influences on inflammation, metabolism, muscle adaptation, and cellular aging. Given the limited sample size, the collected samples will be stored and reserved for future pooled analyses.
- Telomeres and telomerase—Blood samples will be collected at baseline and after 16 weeks of the Onco-Move training. All samples from the same participant will be analyzed on the same plate to ensure consistency, which is crucial for scientific validation. Results will be expressed as relative telomere length.
- Post-training assessment of Onco-Move exercise programme—Participants within 24 h from a training session will report their psychophysical well-being online via a Google document form.
2.11. Control Variables and Other Parameters to Be Recorded
2.12. Interventions
2.13. Data Collection, Management, and Analysis
2.14. Statistical Analysis
2.15. Expected Results
3. Discussion
Limitations
4. Conclusions
Dissemination of Results
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PLWBC | People living with and beyond cancer |
| NGO | Nongovernmental organization |
| ACS | American Cancer Society |
| ACSM | American College of Sports Medicine |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
| HRQoL | Health-related quality of life |
| RCT | Randomized controlled trial |
| CERT | Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template |
| GUPES | Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport |
| QoL | Quality of life |
| FSFI | Female Sexual Function Index |
| IIEF | International Index of Erectile Function |
| UMACL | UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist |
| KPS | The Feeling of Stress Questionnaire |
| PHQ-9 | Patient Health Questionnaire For Anxiety And Depression |
| NEO-FFI | NEO Five-Factor Inventory |
| STAI | State–Trait Anxiety Inventory |
| IFIS | Self-reported physical fitness |
| IPAO | Physical activity objectives |
| PA | Physical activity |
| SFT | Senior Fitness Test |
| SPPB | Short Physical Performance Battery |
| 10MWT | 10-Metre fast walk test |
| MEDAS | Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener |
| EV | Evaluation |
| DV | Development |
| TS | Transitional stimulus |
| ITT | Intention-to-treat principle |
| MMRM | Mixed-effects model for repeated measures |
References
- Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, K.D.; Fidler-Benaoudia, M.; Keegan, T.H.; Hipp, H.S.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Cancer Statistics for Adolescents and Young Adults, 2020. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 443–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en (accessed on 25 April 2025).
- Zhao, J.; Xu, L.; Sun, J.; Song, M.; Wang, L.; Yuan, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wan, Z.; Larsson, S.; Tsilidis, K.; et al. Global Trends in Incidence, Death, Burden and Risk Factors of Early-Onset Cancer from 1990 to 2019. BMJ Oncol. 2023, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, K.L.; Winters-Stone, K.M.; Wiskemann, J.; May, A.M.; Schwartz, A.L.; Courneya, K.S.; Zucker, D.S.; Matthews, C.E.; Ligibel, J.A.; Gerber, L.H.; et al. Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 2375–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stout, N.L.; Santa Mina, D.; Lyons, K.D.; Robb, K.; Silver, J.K. A Systematic Review of Rehabilitation and Exercise Recommendations in Oncology Guidelines. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 149–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, X.; Yang, T.; Nie, X.; Yuan, J. Comparative Effects of Different Types of Physical Activity on Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmitz, K.H.; Courneya, K.S.; Matthews, C.; Demark-Wahnefried, W.; Galvão, D.A.; Pinto, B.M.; Irwin, M.L.; Wolin, K.Y.; Segal, R.J.; Lucia, A.; et al. American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable on Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2010, 42, 1409–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rock, C.L.; Thomson, C.A.; Sullivan, K.R.; Howe, C.L.; Kushi, L.H.; Caan, B.J.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Bandera, E.V.; Wang, Y.; Robien, K.; et al. American Cancer Society Nutrition and Physical Activity Guideline for Cancer Survivors. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 230–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Cancer Institute. Cancer Trends Progress Report. Available online: https://progressreport.cancer.gov/after/physical_activity (accessed on 4 July 2025).
- Avancini, A.; Pala, V.; Trestini, I.; Tregnago, D.; Mariani, L.; Sieri, S.; Krogh, V.; Boresta, M.; Milella, M.; Pilotto, S.; et al. Exercise Levels and Preferences in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hopewell, S.; Chan, A.-W.; Collins, G.S.; Hróbjartsson, A.; Moher, D.; Schulz, K.F.; Tunn, R.; Aggarwal, R.; Berkwits, M.; Berlin, J.A.; et al. CONSORT 2025 Statement: Updated Guideline for Reporting Randomised Trials. Lancet 2025, 405, 1633–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giron, P.S.; Haddad, C.A.S.; de Almeida Rizzi, S.K.L.; Elias, S.; Nazário, A.C.P.; Facina, G. Effect of Exercise Therapy, Systemic Acupuncture and Silicon Oxide Tablets on Muscular Strength, Lymphedema, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: Randomized Clinical Trial. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2025, 26, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bettariga, F.; Taaffe, D.R.; Crespo-Garcia, C.; Clay, T.D.; Galvão, D.A.; Newton, R.U. Effects of Resistance Training vs High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition, Muscle Strength, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Quality of Life in Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2025, 210, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Xing, R.; Wang, R.; Mabiri, B.M.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, W. Effect of Qigong Exercise on Quality of Life and Cortisol in Patients with Cancer: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial. Support Care Cancer 2025, 33, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccinin, C.; Kuliś, D.; Bottomley, A.; Bjordal, K.; Coens, C.; Darlington, A.-S.; Johnson, C.; Velikova, G.; Groenvold, M. EORTC Quality of Life Group Item Library User Guidelines, 1st ed.; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Brussels, Belgium, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Meston, C.M.; Freihart, B.K.; Handy, A.B.; Kilimnik, C.D.; Rosen, R.C. Scoring and Interpretation of the FSFI: What Can Be Learned from 20 Years of Use? J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosen, R.C.; Riley, A.; Wagner, G.; Osterloh, I.H.; Kirkpatrick, J.; Mishra, A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A Multidimensional Scale for Assessment of Erectile Dysfunction. Urology 1997, 49, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matthews, G.; Jones, D.M.; Chamberlain, A.G. Refining the Measurement of Mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. Br. J. Psychol. 1990, 81, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makarowski, R.; Plopa, M. Kwestionariusz Poczucia Stresu. Podręcznik; Vizja Press: Warsaw, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Spitzer, R.L.; Kroenke, K.; Williams, J.B.W. Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group. Validation and Utility of a Self-Report Version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study. JAMA 1999, 282, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Körner, A.; Czajkowska, Z.; Albani, C.; Drapeau, M.; Geyer, M.; Braehler, E. Efficient and Valid Assessment of Personality Traits: Population Norms of a Brief Version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Arch. Psychiatry Psychother. 2015, 17, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knowles, K.A.; Olatunji, B.O. Specificity of Trait Anxiety in Anxiety and Depression: Meta-Analysis of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2020, 82, 101928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estruch, R.; Ros, E.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Covas, M.-I.; Corella, D.; Arós, F.; Gómez-Gracia, E.; Ruiz-Gutiérrez, V.; Fiol, M.; Lapetra, J.; et al. Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet Supplemented with Extra-Virgin Olive Oil or Nuts. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McLester, C.N.; Nickerson, B.S.; Kliszczewicz, B.M.; McLester, J.R. Reliability and Agreement of Various In Body Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women. J. Clin. Densitom. 2020, 23, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, F.B.; Ruiz, J.R.; España-Romero, V.; Vicente-Rodriguez, G.; Martínez-Gómez, D.; Manios, Y.; Béghin, L.; Molnar, D.; Widhalm, K.; Moreno, L.A.; et al. The International Fitness Scale (IFIS): Usefulness of Self-Reported Fitness in Youth. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 40, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipowski, M.; Zaleski, Z. Inventory of Physical Activity Objectives—A New Method of Measuring Motives for Physical Activity and Sport. Health Psychol. Rep. 2015, 3, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, C.J.; Rikli, R.E. Measuring Functional Fitness of Older Adults. J. Act. Aging 2002, 1, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
- de Fátima Ribeiro Silva, C.; Ohara, D.G.; Matos, A.P.; Pinto, A.C.P.N.; Pegorari, M.S. Short Physical Performance Battery as a Measure of Physical Performance and Mortality Predictor in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, B.L.; Schmitz, R. Examination of Balance Measures Produced by the Biodex Stability System. J. Athl. Train. 1998, 33, 323. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bhaskar Raj, N.; Ahmed Shokri, A.; Saha, S.; Nawfar, A.S. Isokinetic Evaluation Systems—Biodex System 4 PRO. 2021. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350873491_ISOKINETIC_EVALUATION_SYSTEMS_-BIODEX_SYSTEM_4_PRO?channel=doi&linkId=607720ea8ea909241efe01b3&showFulltext=true (accessed on 20 October 2025). [CrossRef]
- Souren, T.; Rose, E.; Groepenhoff, H. Comparison of Two Metabolic Simulators Used for Gas Exchange Verification in CardiopulmonaryExercise Test Carts. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 667386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentzoni, F.; Skaugen, M.; Eythorsdottir, I.; Roterud, S.; Johansen, E.S.; Losnegard, T. Precision and Accuracy of Four Handheld Blood Lactate Analyzers across Low to High Exercise Intensities. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2024, 124, 3781–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benatti de Oliveira, G.; Vilar Fernandes, L.; Amaral, T.F.; Vasques, A.C.J.; Pires Corona, L. Validity and Reliability of Grip wise Digital Dynamometer in the Assessment of Hand grip Strength in Older Adults. Front. Aging 2025, 6, 1560097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiménez-Pavón, D.; Jiménez-García, J.D. Conceptualización, Definición y Propuesta del Modelo de Planificación Individualizador y Progresivo enSalud (IPS); Agencia del ISBN Cea Bermúdez: Madrid, Spain, 2020; ISBN 978-84-09-22583-5. [Google Scholar]
- Shahjalal, M.; Dahal, P.K.; Mosharaf, M.P.; Alam, M.M.; Hawlader, M.D.H.; Mahumud, R.A. Economic Burden of Healthcare Services on Cancer Survivors in Bangladesh. Cancer Rep. 2024, 7, e2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 38; Liu, E.; Chu, L.; Islam, J.Y. Financial Hardship and Mental Health Among Cancer Survivors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of the US COVID-19 Household Impact Survey. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 946721. [Google Scholar]
- Mbous, Y.P.V.; Mohamed, R.; Osahor, U.; Le Masters, T.J. Direct Economic Burden of Post-Cancer Treatment Pain Among Cancer Survivors in the United States: A Population-Based Retrospective Longitudinal Study. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2025, 40, 935–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
| Age 18 to 55. Both genders, with no requirement for equal distribution between women and men. Currently undergoing cancer treatment or up to 5 years post-treatment. Individuals with different types of cancer. Participants who have been physically inactive and have led a sedentary lifestyle since diagnosis. Participants who commit to attending three training sessions per week. Oncologist’s approval for participation in the project. Signed informed consent from the patient to participate in the study and consent for personal data processing. | Age under 18 or over 55 at the time of registration for the project. Physically active individuals. Health conditions preventing continued participation in the study or intervention. Participants who do not commit to attending three training sessions per week. Lack of oncologist’s approval for participation in the study and training activities included in the project. Lack of signed informed consent for participation in the study and consent for personal data processing. |
| Measurement | Baseline | 8 Weeks of the Intervention | Post-Intervention (After 16 Weeks of the Intervention) | Follow-Up (3 Months After the Intervention) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome | ||||
| Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 1 | x | x | x | x |
| Secondary outcomes | ||||
| Other quality-of-life variables 2 | x | x | x | x |
| Functional fitness 3 | x | x | x | x |
| Body composition 4 | x | x | x | x |
| Self-reported physical fitness (IFIS) | x | x | x | x |
| Postural stability and balance control | x | x | x | x |
| Neuromuscular function | x | x | x | x |
| Cardiopulmonary fitness | x | x | x | x |
| Lower limb power and force | x | x | x | x |
| Grip strength | x | x | x | x |
| Blood lactate levels | x | x | ||
| Biochemical markers 5 | x | x | ||
| Genetic analysis 6 | x | |||
| Nutritional assessment | x | x | x | x |
| Telomeres and telomerase | x | x | ||
| Post-training assessment 7 | x | x | x |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wieczorek-Przybyło, M.; Lachowicz, M.; Tomczyk, M.; Kowalska, A.; Sprengel, M.; Szczubełek, J.; Niedźwiecki, M.; Barton, W.; Zyborowicz, B.; Jiménez-Pavón, D. Supervised 16-Week Multicomponent Exercise Training Programme for 18–55-Year-Old People Living with and Beyond Cancer—CONSORT 2025-Based Study Protocol of the Pilot Onco-Move Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2026, 18, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18010100
Wieczorek-Przybyło M, Lachowicz M, Tomczyk M, Kowalska A, Sprengel M, Szczubełek J, Niedźwiecki M, Barton W, Zyborowicz B, Jiménez-Pavón D. Supervised 16-Week Multicomponent Exercise Training Programme for 18–55-Year-Old People Living with and Beyond Cancer—CONSORT 2025-Based Study Protocol of the Pilot Onco-Move Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2026; 18(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18010100
Chicago/Turabian StyleWieczorek-Przybyło, Marzena, Milena Lachowicz, Maja Tomczyk, Agnieszka Kowalska, Mateusz Sprengel, Jakub Szczubełek, Michał Niedźwiecki, Wojciech Barton, Bartłomiej Zyborowicz, and David Jiménez-Pavón. 2026. "Supervised 16-Week Multicomponent Exercise Training Programme for 18–55-Year-Old People Living with and Beyond Cancer—CONSORT 2025-Based Study Protocol of the Pilot Onco-Move Randomized Controlled Trial" Nutrients 18, no. 1: 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18010100
APA StyleWieczorek-Przybyło, M., Lachowicz, M., Tomczyk, M., Kowalska, A., Sprengel, M., Szczubełek, J., Niedźwiecki, M., Barton, W., Zyborowicz, B., & Jiménez-Pavón, D. (2026). Supervised 16-Week Multicomponent Exercise Training Programme for 18–55-Year-Old People Living with and Beyond Cancer—CONSORT 2025-Based Study Protocol of the Pilot Onco-Move Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients, 18(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18010100

