Next Article in Journal
Protein and Aging: Practicalities and Practice
Previous Article in Journal
Diet to Data: Validation of a Bias-Mitigating Nutritional Screener Using Assembly Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toward Multidimensional Front-of-Pack Labels: Integrating Nutritional, Environmental, and Processing Information
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluation of the Influence of Intervention Tools Used in Nutrition Education Programs: A Mixed Approach

Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2460; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152460
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 28 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition 3.0: Between Tradition and Innovation)

Abstract

Background: In a global panorama marked by a progressive rise in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and chronic non-communicable disease prevalence, nutrition education (NE) might play a pivotal role in restoring adoption and strengthening adherence to dietary patterns that protect human health. Therefore, the primary purpose of this work is to review the existing scientific literature studying NE programs aimed at schoolchildren in the decade 2014–2024 and evaluate the effectiveness of intervention tools. Methods: During the first phase of this research, a qualitative analysis was conducted to track similarity in intervention tools and strategies used in nutrition education programs. In the second phase, a quantitative analysis was carried out, extracting common parameters among studies and assessing their potential influence in improving adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD). Results: A high degree of heterogeneity was observed in educational program designs and intervention tools, which were usually not properly described and justified. All studies that measured adherence to the MD registered an improvement after the intervention, in some cases even higher than 10%. However, this study found no relationship between common parameters (i.e., number of formal tools, number of non-formal tools, lesson duration, and program length) used in NE and the improvement in students’ adherence to MD. Conclusions: This research has contributed to outlining a general framework of NE and to promoting a systematic approach in this research field.
Keywords: nutrition education; adherence to Mediterranean diet; KIDMED; healthy diets; schoolchildren nutrition education; adherence to Mediterranean diet; KIDMED; healthy diets; schoolchildren

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muzzioli, L.; Gimbo, C.; Pintavalle, M.; Migliaccio, S.; Donini, L.M. Evaluation of the Influence of Intervention Tools Used in Nutrition Education Programs: A Mixed Approach. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152460

AMA Style

Muzzioli L, Gimbo C, Pintavalle M, Migliaccio S, Donini LM. Evaluation of the Influence of Intervention Tools Used in Nutrition Education Programs: A Mixed Approach. Nutrients. 2025; 17(15):2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muzzioli, Luca, Costanza Gimbo, Maria Pintavalle, Silvia Migliaccio, and Lorenzo M. Donini. 2025. "Evaluation of the Influence of Intervention Tools Used in Nutrition Education Programs: A Mixed Approach" Nutrients 17, no. 15: 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152460

APA Style

Muzzioli, L., Gimbo, C., Pintavalle, M., Migliaccio, S., & Donini, L. M. (2025). Evaluation of the Influence of Intervention Tools Used in Nutrition Education Programs: A Mixed Approach. Nutrients, 17(15), 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152460

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop