Next Article in Journal
A Pilot EEG Study on the Acute Neurophysiological Effects of Single-Dose Astragaloside IV in Healthy Young Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Biotin Supplementation—The Cause of Hypersensitivity and Significant Interference in Allergy Diagnostics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Breakfast Food Types with Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among School-Aged Children

by
Siyao Zhou
1,
Hanqing Zhao
1,
Yu Xiao
1,
Jie Li
1,
Qiaoli Huang
1,
Yufang Zhang
1,
Fengfeng Guo
1,
Beibei Xu
1,
Haoyan Zou
1,
Xiaoxia Huang
2,
Sizhe Huang
2 and
Lijun Wang
1,*
1
Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2
Health Care Centre for Primary and Secondary School of Zhongshan, Zhongshan 528403, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2424; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152424
Submission received: 7 June 2025 / Revised: 9 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrient Intake and Food Patterns in Students)

Abstract

Background: Skipping breakfast, a prevalent issue among children and adolescents, has been reported to be associated with academic performance and long-term health. However, less attention has been given to the types of breakfast foods consumed. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the association between breakfast variety and dietary knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) among preadolescents. Methods: The study included 1449 students in grades 4–6 from Zhongshan city, Guangdong province. Data were collected through face-to-face field investigation using a validated questionnaire. The questionnaire encompassed sociodemographic characteristics, as well as dietary KAP. Results: Among all participants, 1315 reported consuming breakfast daily. Dietary diversity varied significantly: 8.8% consumed only 1 type of food, 52.9% consumed 2–4 types, and 38.3% consumed ≥5 types. Students who consumed a greater variety of breakfast foods exhibited more favorable dietary and lifestyle patterns. Specifically, those who consumed ≥5 types of food showed statistically significant associations with healthier practices, including reduced intake of sugary beverages and night snacks, stronger adherence to dietary guidelines, more positive attitudes toward improving eating habits, longer sleep durations, increased participation in meal preparation, greater dish variety in meals, and higher engagement in daily physical activity. Conclusions: Breakfast variety was associated with KAP, particularly when breakfast types ≥ 5, providing more sufficient and favorable evidence for breakfast consumption.

1. Introduction

Dietary habits have a significant impact on overall health and wellbeing [1,2]. The China Dietary Guidelines for School-aged Children (2022) emphasize that dietary recommendations for this group should be based on those for the general population and must also be adapted to reflect current changes in the nutritional status of school-aged children. Breakfast is universally recognized as the most crucial meal of the day [3,4], influencing children’s growth, including height and weight development, as well as metabolic function, with effects potentially extending into adulthood [5,6]. The Dietary Guidelines for Chinese School-aged Children (2022) emphasize the importance of consuming a nutritious breakfast daily. It is recommended that school-aged children incorporate four food groups into their breakfast: cereals and potatoes, vegetables and fruits, meat and eggs, and milk, soy, and nuts. If this is not feasible, at least three of these food groups should be consumed. Breakfast skipping is highly prevalent among school-aged children. A study involving 71,390 students in grades 4–12 from South Australian public schools revealed that 55.0% never skipped breakfast, 17.4% occasionally skipped, 18.0% frequently skipped, and 9.5% always skipped breakfast [7]. A cross-sectional study conducted in China found that 61.5% of students consumed breakfast daily, with higher adherence observed among younger students, urban school students, and those attending academic high school [8].
The habit of skipping breakfast among children and preadolescents can have lasting health consequences, as infrequent breakfast consumption (never or 1–3 times per week) during this developmental stage is associated with obesity [9], stress and depression [10], cardiometabolic risk [11], and other adverse outcomes [12]. A systematic review indicated that children who skipped breakfast had an increased risk of overweight and obesity (AOR = 1.59; 95%CI = 1.33–1.90), with the effect being more pronounced in girls [13], and was also linked to a higher risk of dyslipidemia [14]. A Canadian study found that adolescents who skipped breakfast were more likely to experience psychosomatic symptoms compared to those who consumed breakfast regularly (AOR = 2.55; 95% CI = 1.75–3.82) [15]. Research has demonstrated that breakfast positively influences cognitive functioning, including reaction time and visual-sustained attention [16]. Furthermore, infrequent breakfast consumption during childhood and adolescence is associated with reduced academic performance [17] and lower levels of school engagement [18].
While current research has primarily focused on the frequency of breakfast consumption, equal attention should be given to the diversity of food types consumed during breakfast [19]. A regular breakfast that includes a variety of food items is essential for maintaining a balanced diet in children, providing the necessary nutrients and energy required for their physical growth and cognitive development [20,21]. Therefore, this study aims to examine the diversity of breakfast foods among school-aged children and explore the potential association between breakfast food variety and dietary knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP). Understanding these associations is critical for designing targeted interventions and educational programs aimed at promoting healthy eating behaviors among primary school students. By elucidating the influence of breakfast diversity on dietary practice, this research seeks to provide valuable insights for educators, parents, and health professionals, ultimately supporting to development of evidence-based strategies to enhance students’ overall health and wellbeing.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and Settings

We conducted a cross-sectional survey in April 2021, involving multiple primary schools in Zhongshan city, Guangdong province. To ensure representativeness, three districts—Eastern District, Western District, and Shiqi District—were randomly selected from five urban districts in Zhongshan City based on geographical location. Within each selected district, three primary schools were initially identified, resulting in a total of nine schools. However, considering practical participation conditions and the principle of voluntary cooperation, we ensured that at least one school from each district participated. After completing the selection procedures, five schools ultimately participated in the survey: one from the Eastern District, three from the Western District, and one from the Shiqi District. Stratified cluster sampling was conducted among students in grades 4 to 6 from the five selected schools, stratified by school size. All students within the target grade levels were included for participation. The sample size estimation was performed using the following parameters: a two-sided significance level of α = 0.05, statistical power of 1 − β = 95.0%, an estimated nutrition knowledge awareness rate of p = 26.1% among Chinese primary school students, an allowable error margin of d = 0.1 × p = 0.026, and the sample size calculation formula n = Z 1 α / 2 2 p q d 2 . The sample size was calculated using PASS 15 software. Considering an anticipated data loss rate of 15.0%, the minimum required sample size was determined to be 1262 participants. Ultimately, a total of 1449 students were enrolled in this study, with sex information based on self-report data.
Study participants were required to meet the following criteria: (1) voluntary participation, (2) the cognitive and practical ability to independently complete the questionnaire, and (3) having undergone the school entrance physical examination. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) students with specific dietary requirements due to personal illnesses or other medical reasons, and (2) students who were unable to independently complete the questionnaire due to illness or other related factors. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Jinan University (JNUKY-2023-0043).

2.2. Questionnaire Design

Validity analysis: This study utilized a self-designed, non-scaled questionnaire and conducted validity analysis through content validity procedures. The “Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire” and the “Children’s Dietary Attitude and Behavior Questionnaire” (Table 1 and Table 2) were developed based on the survey objectives and by referencing relevant studies conducted in other regions of China. To assess preliminary applicability, a pilot survey was administered to 45 students from Zhongshan Experimental Primary School. Revisions to the questionnaire content and question order were made according to the pilot survey results, student feedback, and expert opinions from the fields of nutrition and child health.
Reliability analysis: The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using test–retest reliability. A total of 45 fifth-grade students from the Lanbowan School of Zhongshan Experimental Primary School were randomly selected as participants for reliability testing, and the same group was retested two weeks later. The results from the two administrations were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient analysis, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.848 (p < 0.01).

2.3. Assessments

Data collection was conducted through face-to-face field investigations using a validated questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed by the students themselves, with guidance from teachers and investigators. Information on sociodemographic characteristics was collected, including gender, grade, the presence of a decayed tooth, only-child status within the family, and parental education level. Other variables from the questionnaire were categorized into three domains: dietary knowledge, attitude, and practice. Nutritional knowledge was assessed by assigning 1 point for each correct answer and 0 for incorrect or unknown responses. The total knowledge score ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores reflecting better nutrition understanding (Table 1). Detailed items of the nutritional attitude and practice are presented in Table 2.
Data on height and weight were obtained from school physical examination records. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. The BMI z-score (BAZ) was computed using the World Health Organization (WHO) growth reference data for individuals aged 5–19 years [22]. BAZ serves as a standardized indicator of BMI, adjusted for age and sex relative to a reference population. Children’s nutritional status was classified based on BAZ values as follows: Thinness (−2 < BAZ ≤ −1), Normal weight (−1 < BAZ ≤ +1), Overweight (+1 < BAZ ≤ +2), and Obesity (BAZ > +2).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.0. Continuous variables with a normal distribution were summarized using the Mean ± standard deviation (SD), and comparisons between groups were performed using Student’s t-test for two groups and one-way ANOVA for more than two groups. Bonferroni correction was applied for post hoc pairwise comparisons within groups. For continuous variables with a skewed distribution, the median (P25, P75) was reported, and group comparisons were carried out using non-parametric rank-sum tests. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages (n%) and analyzed using the Chi-square test.
Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between skipping breakfast and dietary KAP, presenting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subsequently, multiple logistic regression analysis was utilized to assess the association (OR and 95%CIs) between the variety of food types consumed during breakfast and dietary KAP. The independent variable X was ranked according to a hierarchical scale ranging from consistent with healthier nutritional practice to more inclination toward unhealthy attitudes or behaviors (excluding the “Nutrition knowledge score”, which was ranked from low to high). A two-sided p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics and KAP of the Participants

The baseline characteristics, knowledge scores, attitudes, and health-related practices of all students are summarized in Table 3 A total of 1449 students participated in the study, with 1315 (90.8%) reporting daily breakfast consumption over the past week, while 134 (9.2%) skipped breakfast at least once during that period. Among the age groups, 11-year-old students had the highest proportion of daily breakfast consumption, with a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 12.89, p = 0.005). Similar trends were also observed in different grades. Students in sixth grade exhibited a significantly higher rate of breakfast skipping compared to those in other grades (χ2 = 17.45, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding gender, nutritional status, being an only child, or parental educational level (Table 3).
Individuals who consumed breakfast daily demonstrated significantly higher willingness to try non-preferred foods (χ2 = 15.13, p < 0.001), actively participate in dietary activities (χ2 = 21.26, p < 0.001), pursue nutritionally adequate diets (χ2 = 7.37, p = 0.025), and modify unhealthy eating habits (χ2 = 25.54, p < 0.001) compared to those who skipped breakfast. A significantly higher proportion of students who consumed breakfast daily chose ≥5 types of breakfast foods compared to those who did not eat breakfast regularly (χ2 = 9.61, p = 0.008). Students who adhered to daily breakfast consumption exhibited a stronger preference for water over alternatives such as tea, sugared beverages, and milk (χ2 = 26.66, p < 0.001). Additionally, these students showed significantly higher consumption frequencies of eggs (≥1 per day) (χ2 = 6.92, p = 0.009), fruits (≥400 g/d) (χ2 = 6.51, p = 0.039), nuts (≥1 time/w) (χ2 = 14.89, p = 0.001), and vegetables (≥5 types/d) (χ2 = 16.35, p < 0.001). Conversely, the consumption frequencies of staple foods (4–7 times/w) (χ2 = 11.70, p < 0.001), sugared beverages (≥3 times/w) (χ2 = 3.89, p = 0.049), and night snacks (≥3 times/w) (χ2 = 15.46, p < 0.001) were significantly lower among students who regularly consumed breakfast (Table 4).
In terms of dietary practice, individuals who consumed breakfast daily showed a greater likelihood of participating in food preparation with their parents on a daily basis (χ2 = 12.50, p = 0.006), engaging in independent cooking (≥3 times per week) (χ2 = 13.13, p = 0.004), and checking expiration dates when purchasing food (every time) (χ2 = 22.59, p < 0.001). With regard to physical activities, students who consumed breakfast daily demonstrated a significantly higher tendency to engage in vigorous physical activity (daily) (χ2 = 10.61, p = 0.005) and to be physically active during school breaks (χ2 = 5.94, p = 0.015) (Table 5).

3.2. The Relationship Between Breakfast Frequency and Dietary KAP

After adjusting for grade, gender, nutritional status, being an only child, and parental education level, the associations between breakfast consumption and dietary KAP among all students are presented in Figure 1 and Table 6.
Students with a higher level of interest in dietary activities were more likely to consume breakfast daily compared to those with lower interest (AOR = 0.420, 95%CI = 0.186–0.948). Furthermore, students who expressed either neutral or high levels of interest in modifying unhealthy eating habits exhibited a greater tendency toward regular breakfast consumption than those who showed no interest (AOR = 0.434, 95%CI = 0.226–0.835 & AOR = 0.312, 95%CI = 0.152–0.639, respectively). In addition, students who selected water as their preferred beverage demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood of consuming breakfast regularly compared to those who consumed tea, sugared beverages, or milk (AOR = 0.404, 95%CI = 0.248–0.659). Moreover, students who consumed nuts 1–2 times per week were more likely to eat breakfast daily than those who never consumed nuts (AOR = 0.541, 95%CI = 0.312–0.940). Similarly, students who consumed vegetable ≥5 types/day were more inclined to eat breakfast daily compared to those who consumed only 1–2 types/day (AOR = 0.525, 95%CI = 0.283–0.975). Regarding night snack consumption, students who indulged ≤2 times per week tended to consume breakfast daily than those who consumed night snacks ≥3 times per week (AOR = 0.514, 95%CI = 0.329–0.804).
In terms of culinary skill, students who engaged in independent cooking on a daily basis or consistently checked expiration dates when purchasing food showed a higher likelihood of consuming breakfast daily (AOR = 0.263, 95%CI = 0.093–0.745 &AOR = 0.375, 95%CI = 0.190–0.740, respectively). With regard to physical activity, students who participated in physical activity during class breaks were more inclined to consume breakfast daily compared to their inactive counterparts (AOR = 0.572, 95%CI = 0.365–0.896).

3.3. Discrepancy of Breakfast Types Among Different Demographic Characteristics and Dietary KAP Groups

As shown in Table 7, among the 1449 participants in our study, a total of 135 students (9.3%) reported consuming ≤1 type of breakfast, while 776 students (53.6%) consumed 2–4 types of foods for breakfast; furthermore, 538 students (37.1%) consumed ≥5 types within the past seven days. Age and grade distribution revealed significant variation (χ2 = 19.76, p = 0.003 & χ2 = 27.87, p < 0.001). In terms of age distribution, children of different ages mainly consume 2–4 types of breakfast, and when divided by grade, the proportion of sixth graders who consume ≤5 types of breakfast is the highest.
Significant differences in nutritional attitudes were observed in the ≥5 breakfast type group, including a higher willingness to try non-preferred foods (χ2 = 47.05, p < 0.001), greater interest in dietary activities (χ2 = 83.69, p < 0.001), increased motivation for the diet to meet nutritional requirements (χ2 = 35.49, p < 0.001), and a more positive attitude toward changing poor eating habits (χ2 = 41.28, p < 0.001) (Table 8).
Significant differences were observed in nutritional practices, including choices of thirst-quenching drinks (χ2 = 7.38, p = 0.025), daily water intake (χ2 = 73.52, p < 0.001), and consumption of milk (χ2 = 24.42, p < 0.001), eggs (χ2 = 55.42, p < 0.001), fruits (χ2 = 46.79, p < 0.001), nuts (χ2 = 52.22, p < 0.001), and vegetables (χ2 = 28.32, p < 0.001). The group consuming ≥5 types of breakfast items more frequently met recommended intake levels, with 61.7% of students consuming ≥1100 mL of water daily. Chi-square tests also revealed significant differences in the consumption frequencies of staple foods (χ2 = 42.03, p < 0.001), meat (χ2 = 26.19, p < 0.001), sugared beverages (χ2 = 22.92, p < 0.001), Western fast food (χ2 = 14.15, p < 0.001), high-calorie snacks (χ2 = 8.78, p = 0.012), and night snacks (χ2 = 13.33, p = 0.001) across breakfast type groups, with the high-diversity breakfast group (≥5 types) consistently showing reduced high-frequency consumption of less healthy options (Table 9).
Moreover, this group exhibited significantly higher levels of engagement in various household food-related activities, including participating in food preparation with their parents (χ2 = 66.72, p < 0.001), cooking a greater variety of dishes (χ2 = 44.74, p < 0.001), engaging in independent cooking (χ2 = 38.64, p < 0.001) and checking food expiration dates (χ2 = 51.43, p < 0.001). Physical activity and sleep patterns further highlighted disparities: high-intensity exercise (χ2 = 65.71, p < 0.001), ≥2 h of daily physical activity (χ2 = 60.74, p < 0.001) and ≥9 h of sleep per night (χ2 = 62.48, p < 0.001) were more prevalent in the group consuming ≥5 types of breakfast items (Table 10).

3.4. Types of Breakfast Foods and Their Associations with KAP

After adjusting for gender, grade, nutritional status, being an only child, and parental education level through multivariable analysis, the associations between breakfast food type consumption and dietary KAP among all students are presented in Figure 2 and Table 11.
The scores for nutritional knowledge demonstrated a negative association with an increase in the number of breakfast types consumed. Compared with individuals who consumed ≤1 type of breakfast, those who consumed 2–4 types (AOR = 0.917, 95%CI = 0.859–0.979) and ≥5 types (AOR = 0.854, 95%CI = 0.796–0.915) had significantly lower nutritional knowledge scores. Regarding attitudes, students who consumed ≥5 types of breakfast exhibited greater willingness to try non-preferred foods (AOR = 2.476, 95%CI = 1.038–5.905).
Students with water intake ≥1100 mL/d showed a stronger inclination toward consuming a greater variety of breakfast types (≥5 types) compared to those with water intake <1100 mL/d (AOR = 1.971, 95%CI = 1.168–3.327). For students who consume nuts at least 3 times per week, as well as those who consume nuts 1–2 times per week, both groups were more likely to consume breakfast containing at least 5 food items compared to students who never consumed nuts (AOR = 2.879, 95%CI = 1.341–6.181 & AOR = 2.031, 95%CI = 1.061–3.891, respectively). Students who consumed starchy foods 4–7 times weekly were less likely to eat five or more types of breakfast than those who consumed them 1–3 times per week (AOR = 0.515, 95%CI = 0.303–0.875). Similarly, students who consumed meat 4–7 times per week were significantly less likely to have breakfast containing 2–4 items (AOR = 0.607, 95%CI = 0.373–0.985) or ≥5 items (AOR = 0.529, 95%CI = 0.308–0.909) compared to those who consumed meat 1–3 times per week.
Regarding culinary abilities, students who were capable of preparing at least three distinct dishes were more likely to consume either ≥5 or 2–4 types of breakfast items compared to their counterparts lacking such skills (AOR = 2.301, 95%CI = 1.001–5.292 & AOR = 3.775, 95%CI = 1.389–10.258, respectively). Moreover, students who consistently checked expiration dates when purchasing food items were more likely to consume 2–4 distinct types of food for breakfast, compared to those who never checked expiration dates (AOR = 2.054, 95%CI = 1.017–4.148).
Regarding physical activity, students who engaged in at least 2 h of daily physical activity were more likely to consume five or more types of food for breakfast compared to those who engaged in less than one hour of physical activity (AOR = 2.799, 95%CI = 1.240–6.321).

4. Discussion

This study explored the association between breakfast (including frequency and composition) and dietary KAP among schoolchildren in Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, using a cross-sectional survey design. The results indicated that 38.3% of students who consistently consumed breakfast with at least five food items exhibited healthier dietary attitudes and behaviors, including greater openness to trying new foods, reduced consumption of sugary beverages and night snacks, increased intake of vegetables and nuts, and more active physical activity habits. These findings not only underscore the importance of breakfast quality in shaping children’s health behaviors but also provide empirical support for optimizing breakfast-related intervention strategies.
Our findings reveal that, similar to breakfast frequency, the type of breakfast consumed is uniquely associated with grade level as a demographic characteristic. This may be interpreted as an increase in teenagers’ awareness of healthy breakfast habits as they progress through their school years. With respect to dietary behavior characteristics, a statistically significant difference was observed between breakfast consumption patterns and food type selections. Specifically, children who regularly consume breakfast exhibit significantly higher rates of consuming ≥5 types of breakfast items compared to those who eat breakfast irregularly. This suggests that consistent breakfast consumers tend to adopt more diversified dietary patterns. Notably, breakfast variety demonstrated a negative correlation with nutritional knowledge scores, and this inverse relationship became stronger as food diversity increased—a finding that contradicts the existing literature [23]. Therefore, given the potential discrepancy between theoretical understanding and practical implementation, future research should consider incorporating interventions that complement theoretical nutritional education with practical guidance on implementation.
In terms of dietary attitude characteristics, individuals who consumed a greater variety of breakfast items consistently exhibited more proactive dietary attitudes. Consistent with previous findings, children’s positive attitudes toward breakfast were significantly associated with higher levels of healthy eating self-efficacy (e.g., confidence in selecting nutritious foods) [24]. Increased breakfast diversity was correlated with greater willingness to try disliked foods, enhanced interest in food-related activities, a stronger commitment to nutritional balance, and increased motivation to change unhealthy eating habits. Following adjustment for potential confounders, frequent willingness to try disliked foods was found to be positively associated with daily consumption of ≥5 breakfast varieties. These findings suggest that fostering healthy dietary attitudes in children may enhance the overall quality of their breakfast intake [25]. Existing research confirms that children’s dietary perceptions, including beliefs, attitudes, facilitators, and perceived barriers, serve as a key determinant of breakfast behaviors [26]. Therefore, during the development of a nutritionally balanced breakfast routine, individuals’ cognitive attitudes function as a central regulatory mechanism in dietary decision-making processes [27].
In the realm of nutritional practice, our research revealed that individuals who consumed a diverse range of breakfast items were more frequently engaged in health-promoting behaviors, such as prioritizing water intake and increasing consumption of dairy products, eggs, fruits, vegetables, and nuts. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated higher intakes of vegetables and dairy among regular breakfast consumers [8,28,29,30]. Our analysis of nut consumption revealed significantly higher intake in the group consuming ≥5 breakfast varieties compared to those consuming fewer varieties, although overall nut consumption remained below recommended levels across all groups. Adjusted analyses indicated that a greater frequency of nut consumption (1–2 times/week and ≥3 times/week) was positively correlated with consuming ≥5 breakfast varieties, with the strongest associations observed at the highest levels of nut intake. These results underscore the importance of targeted guidance on nut consumption, particularly for individuals who consume 2–4 breakfast varieties [31,32]. With regard to unhealthy diet patterns, individuals with more diverse breakfasts showed significantly lower consumption of Western-style fast food and high-calorie snacks [33]. Although the initial analysis suggested an association between weekly sugar-sweetened beverage intake (≤2 times/week) and both 2–4 and ≥5 breakfast variety groups [34], this relationship was no longer significant after adjusting for confounding variables, potentially due to the uneven distribution of adjusted variables across groups.
However, increased breakfast diversity was associated with lower weekly consumption frequencies of staple foods (4–7 times/week) and meats (4–7 times/week). Following the adjustment of confounding variables, both staple food and meat consumption showed negative correlations with the consumption of ≥5 breakfast varieties. Students who consumed only a single type of breakfast food were more likely to rely exclusively on staple foods or meats, which are perceived as more satiating and convenient. This pattern may have contributed to a habitual preference for these food groups in daily dietary intake. Another study reported a significant relationship between dietary diversity and staple food intake, where lower dietary diversity was associated with higher consumption of staple foods—findings that align with those of our study [35]. Furthermore, students who consume a greater variety of breakfast items tend to prefer high-protein and fiber-rich foods such as vegetables and fruits [36], leading to a reduction in overall intake of carbohydrates and fats. These results are consistent with findings from other studies [37,38].
Regarding culinary practice characteristics, the highest proportion of individuals consuming ≥5 breakfast varieties was observed among those who prepare cooking ingredients with their parents daily, are capable of cooking at least three dishes, regularly engage in independent cooking activities, and routinely check the expiration dates when purchasing food, with statistically significant differences between groups [39]. Correlation analysis revealed that having ≥3 cooking skills was positively associated with the consumption of both 2–4 and ≥5 breakfast varieties, with the strength of association increasing as breakfast diversity increased. Aligning with our findings, a health literacy intervention study targeting adolescent students—including a component focused on cooking skills—demonstrated that improved dietary literacy can lead to positive changes in dietary behavior [40]. Therefore, we recommend enhancing breakfast quality through collaborative efforts between families and schools in a culinary education program.
Regarding physical activity and sleep characteristics, individuals who consumed ≥5 breakfast varieties exhibited the highest rates of participation in high-intensity exercise, engagement in ≥2 h of daily physical activity, and ≥9 h of nightly sleep. After adjustment for potential confounders, engaging in ≥2 h of daily exercise remained positively correlated with consuming ≥5 breakfast varieties. Existing evidence indicates that physical activity may indirectly influence breakfast behaviors by improving overall health, which in turn encourages families to prioritize nutritious breakfast options [34]. Moreover, physical exercise may also indirectly promote breakfast intake by increasing a child’s energy requirements, particularly in the morning when substantial energy is needed to support physical activities [41]. Therefore, our study identified significant associations between healthy lifestyle habits and both the regularity and variety of breakfast, which are reflected through positive dietary attitudes, balanced nutrition, and active lifestyles. The observed association between breakfast patterns and the KAP model provides empirical support for comprehensive public health strategies. Furthermore, several existing intervention studies align with this perspective. For instance, a study conducted among primary school children suggested that a three-month intervention in a healthy school canteen environment can effectively improve children’s eating behaviors [42]. However, prior studies have not specifically addressed interventions targeting the composition or variety of breakfast itself. Therefore, our findings provide foundational insights that may inform the design and implementation of future intervention trials.

5. Strengths and Limitations

The strength of this study lies in its incorporation of breakfast diversity—including both consumption frequency and typological variations—into the KAP analytical framework, providing novel insights into children’s dietary behaviors. Secondly, the utilization of a large-scale sample enhanced the representativeness and generalizability of the findings to the broader study area. Thirdly, the comprehensive examination of multiple dimensions of dietary KAP patterns provides a holistic understanding of how the children’s KAP components interact with their breakfast habits. This multidimensional approach establishes a robust scientific foundation for the development of evidence-based interventions targeting childhood dietary behaviors.
This study also has several limitations. First, potential recall bias may exist as the data were self-reported based on participants’ memories. To mitigate this limitation, investigators underwent systematic training and adhered to standardized protocols during data collection, aiming to minimize inconsistencies in participants’ recall. Second, the study focused on students in Grades 4 to 6 from Zhongshan City, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Regional socioeconomic disparities—particularly between urban and rural or less-developed areas—further constrain the applicability of the results beyond the studied population. Finally, the indicators used in this study were mainly qualitative and did not include a detailed assessment of specific breakfast or overall dietary intake. Future research could adopt quantitative dietary assessment methods, such as food frequency questionnaires or 24 h dietary recalls, to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the findings.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates significant associations between breakfast diversity and health-related behaviors among school-aged children, underscoring breakfast quality as a modifiable factor that can be targeted to improve children’s health behaviors. These findings provide a valuable foundation for the development of future interventions aimed at promoting healthy child development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and L.W.; data curation, S.Z.; formal analysis, S.Z., H.Z. (Hanqing Zhao), Y.X., Q.H., J.L., Y.Z., F.G., B.X. and H.Z. (Haoyan Zou); funding acquisition, X.H., S.H. and L.W.; investigation, S.Z., H.Z. (Hanqing Zhao), X.H., Y.X., Q.H., J.L., Y.Z., F.G., B.X., H.Z. (Haoyan Zou), S.H. and L.W.; methodology, S.Z., H.Z. (Hanqing Zhao), Y.X., Q.H., J.L., Y.Z., F.G., B.X., H.Z. (Haoyan Zou) and L.W.; project administration, X.H., S.H. and L.W.; resources, X.H., S.H. and L.W.; software, Y.X.; supervision, L.W.; validation, L.W.; writing—original draft, S.Z., H.Z. (Hanqing Zhao), Q.H. and L.W.; writing—review and editing, S.Z. and L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) Nutrition Science Foundation-YUM China Dietary Health Foundation, Grant Number: CNS-YUM2024-121; the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Grant Number: 2023A1515030168; and the “Master Mentor Plan” of Jinan University, Nutrition Professional Instructor Comprehensive Competency Enhancement Practical Program, Grant Number: YDXS2410.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Medical Ethics Committee of Jinan University (Approval No. JNUKY-2023-0101); ethical approval date (12 June 2023). Special care was taken to prioritize the wellbeing and rights of the children, including the freedom to withdraw from the study at any stage without consequence.

Informed Consent Statement

Prior to participation, written informed consent was obtained from all legal guardians of the school-aged children involved and written informed consent has been obtained from the participants to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All data collected were anonymized and stored securely to protect participant confidentiality. No personally identifiable information was disclosed during data analysis or reporting. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (L.W.), upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work.

References

  1. Gentile, C.L.; Weir, T.L. The Gut Microbiota at the Intersection of Diet and Human Health. Science 2018, 362, 776–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, M.; Wu, Z. Associations of Breakfast Habits and Breakfast Quality with Depression Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on NHANES 2007–2018. J. Affect. Disord. 2025, 375, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ferrer-Cascales, R.; Sánchez-SanSegundo, M.; Ruiz-Robledillo, N.; Albaladejo-Blázquez, N.; Laguna-Pérez, A.; Zaragoza-Martí, A. Eat or Skip Breakfast? The Important Role of Breakfast Quality for Health-Related Quality of Life, Stress and Depression in Spanish Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jackson, L. Most Important Meal of the Day: Why Children Skip Breakfast and What Can Be Done About It. Pediatr. Ann. 2013, 42, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smith, K.J.; Gall, S.L.; McNaughton, S.A.; Blizzard, L.; Dwyer, T.; Venn, A.J. Skipping Breakfast: Longitudinal Associations with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health Study123. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 1316–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gong, W.-J.; Fong, D.Y.-T.; Wang, M.-P.; Lam, T.-H.; Chung, T.W.-H.; Ho, S.-Y. Skipping Breakfast and Eating Breakfast Away from Home Were Prospectively Associated with Emotional and Behavioral Problems in 115,217 Chinese Adolescents. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 32, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sincovich, A.; Moller, H.; Smithers, L.; Brushe, M.; Lassi, Z.S.; Brinkman, S.A.; Gregory, T. Prevalence of Breakfast Skipping among Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Population Level Study. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, M.; Zhong, J.-M.; Wang, H.; Zhao, M.; Gong, W.-W.; Pan, J.; Fei, F.-R.; Wu, H.-B.; Yu, M. Breakfast Consumption and Its Associations with Health-Related Behaviors among School-Aged Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study in Zhejiang Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ardeshirlarijani, E.; Namazi, N.; Jabbari, M.; Zeinali, M.; Gerami, H.; Jalili, R.B.; Larijani, B.; Azadbakht, L. The Link between Breakfast Skipping and Overweigh/Obesity in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2019, 18, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zahedi, H.; Djalalinia, S.; Sadeghi, O.; Zare Garizi, F.; Asayesh, H.; Payab, M.; Zarei, M.; Qorbani, M. Breakfast Consumption and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutr. Neurosci. 2022, 25, 1250–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. de Souza, M.R.; Neves, M.E.A.; de Moura Souza, A.; Muraro, A.P.; Pereira, R.A.; Ferreira, M.G.; Rodrigues, P.R.M. Skipping Breakfast Is Associated with the Presence of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adolescents: Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents–ERICA. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 126, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ofori-Asenso, R.; Owen, A.J.; Liew, D. Skipping Breakfast and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Death: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies in Primary Prevention Settings. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2019, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, K.; Niu, Y.; Lu, Z. The Effect of Breakfast on Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1222536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Q.; Wu, C.; Ma, P.; Cui, H.; Li, R.; Hong, C.; Zeng, L.; Liao, S.; Xiao, L.; Liu, L.; et al. Breakfast Consumption Frequency Is Associated with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Working Population. Lipids. Health. Dis. 2022, 21, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peprah, P.; Oduro, M.S.; Boakye, P.A.; Morgan, A.K. Association between Breakfast Skipping and Psychosomatic Symptoms among Canadian Adolescents. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2024, 183, 1607–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Adolphus, K.; Hoyland, A.; Walton, J.; Quadt, F.; Lawton, C.L.; Dye, L. Ready-to-Eat Cereal and Milk for Breakfast Compared with No Breakfast Has a Positive Acute Effect on Cognitive Function and Subjective State in 11–13-Year-Olds: A School-Based, Randomised, Controlled, Parallel Groups Trial. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 3325–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Abebe, L.; Mengistu, N.; Tesfaye, T.S.; Kabthymer, R.H.; Molla, W.; Tarekegn, D.; Wudneh, A.; Shonor, M.N.; Yimer, S. Breakfast Skipping and Its Relationship with Academic Performance in Ethiopian School-Aged Children, 2019. BMC Nutr. 2022, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Moller, H.; Sincovich, A.; Gregory, T.; Smithers, L. Breakfast Skipping and Cognitive and Emotional Engagement at School: A Cross-Sectional Population-Level Study. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 3356–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Salas-González, M.D.; Lozano-Estevan, M.-d.C.; Aparicio, A.; Bermejo, L.M.; Loria-Kohen, V.; Ortega, R.M.; López-Sobaler, A.M. Breakfast Quality and Insulin Resistance in Spanish Schoolchildren: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bonnet, J.P.; Cardel, M.I.; Cellini, J.; Hu, F.B.; Guasch-Ferré, M. Breakfast Skipping, Body Composition, and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Obesity 2020, 28, 1098–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ruiz, E.; Ávila, J.M.; Valero, T.; Rodriguez, P.; Varela-Moreiras, G. Breakfast Consumption in Spain: Patterns, Nutrient Intake and Quality. Findings from the ANIBES Study, a Study from the International Breakfast Research Initiative. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Growth Reference 5–19 Years-BMI-for-Age (5–19 Years). Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index (accessed on 19 December 2024).
  23. Spronk, I.; Kullen, C.; Burdon, C.; O’Connor, H. Relationship between Nutrition Knowledge and Dietary Intake. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 1713–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Montenegro-Espinosa, J.A.; López-Gil, J.F. Does Sex Matter in the Link Between Self-Efficacy and Mediterranean Diet Adherence in Adolescents? Insights from the EHDLA Study. Nutrients 2025, 17, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brown, J.M.; Tahir, S.; Franco-Arellano, B.; LeSage, A.; Hughes, J.; Kapralos, B.; Lou, W.; Vogel, E.; Farkouh, M.; Tugault-Lafleur, C.; et al. Efficacy of the Foodbot Factory Digital Curriculum-Based Nutrition Education Intervention in Improving Children’s Nutrition Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours in Elementary School Classrooms: Protocol for a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ Open 2025, 15, e092426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Eck, K.M.; Delaney, C.L.; Clark, R.L.; Leary, M.P.; Shelnutt, K.P.; Olfert, M.D.; Byrd-Bredbenner, C. The “Motor of the Day”: Parent and School-Age Children’s Cognitions, Barriers, and Supports for Breakfast. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Olfert, M.D.; Hagedorn, R.L.; Leary, M.P.; Eck, K.; Shelnutt, K.P.; Byrd-Bredbenner, C. Parent and School-Age Children’s Food Preparation Cognitions and Behaviors Guide Recommendations for Future Interventions. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2019, 51, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. McLeod, C.J.; Haycraft, E.; Daley, A.J. Would Offering Vegetables to Children for Breakfast Increase Their Total Daily Vegetable Intake? Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 3312–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Valtueña, J.; Cuenca-García, M.; Gottrand, F.; Breidenassel, C.; Ferrari, M.; Manios, Y.; Henauw, S.D.; Widhalm, K.; Kafatos, A.; et al. Regular Breakfast Consumption Is Associated with Higher Blood Vitamin Status in Adolescents: The HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sagbo, H.; Kpodji, P. Dietary Diversity and Associated Factors among School-Aged Children and Adolescents in Lokossa District of Southern Benin: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e066309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Oliver Olid, A.; Fabios, E.; García-Blanco, L.; Moreno-Villares, J.M.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Martín-Calvo, N. Higher Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Is Associated with Lower Micronutrient Inadequacy in Children: The SENDO Project. Public Health Nutr. 2023, 27, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Neale, E.P.; Tran, G.; Brown, R.C. Barriers and Facilitators to Nut Consumption: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Medin, A.C.; Myhre, J.B.; Diep, L.M.; Andersen, L.F. Diet Quality on Days without Breakfast or Lunch—Identifying Targets to Improve Adolescents’ Diet. Appetite 2019, 135, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Smith, K.J.; Breslin, M.C.; McNaughton, S.A.; Gall, S.L.; Blizzard, L.; Venn, A.J. Skipping Breakfast among Australian Children and Adolescents; Findings from the 2011–12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Aust. New Zealand J. Public Health 2017, 41, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Haimoto, H.; Watanabe, S.; Komeda, M.; Wakai, K. The Impact of Carbohydrate Intake and Its Sources on Hemoglobin A1c Levels in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Not Taking Anti-Diabetic Medication. DMSO 2018, 11, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Manon, P.; Samantha, C.; Carolus, V. How Infants and Young Children Learn About Food: A Systematic Review. Front. Nutr. 2017, 8, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, X.; Chen, Q.; Pu, Y.; Guo, M.; Jiang, Z.; Huang, W.; Long, Y.; Xu, Y. Skipping Breakfast Is Associated with Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ramsay, S.A.; Bloch, T.D.; Marriage, B.; Shriver, L.H.; Spees, C.K.; Taylor, C.A. Skipping Breakfast Is Associated with Lower Diet Quality in Young US Children. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Harley, A.; Lemke, M.; Brazauskas, R.; Carnegie, N.B.; Bokowy, L.; Kingery, L. Youth Chef Academy: Pilot Results From a Plant-Based Culinary and Nutrition Literacy Program for Sixth and Seventh Graders. J. Sch. Health 2018, 88, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mancone, S.; Corrado, S.; Tosti, B.; Spica, G.; Di Siena, F.; Misiti, F.; Diotaiuti, P. Enhancing Nutritional Knowledge and Self-Regulation among Adolescents: Efficacy of a Multifaceted Food Literacy Intervention. Front. Psychol. 2024, 15, 1405414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Drozdowska, A.; Falkenstein, M.; Lücke, T.; Kersting, M.; Jendrusch, G.; Platen, P.; Sinningen, K. Unfavorable Behaviors in Children Run in Packs! Dietary and Non-Dietary Modulators of Attentional Capacity. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Teo, C.H.; Chin, Y.S.; Lim, P.Y.; Masrom, S.A.H.; Shariff, Z.M. Impacts of a School-Based Intervention That Incorporates Nutrition Education and a Supportive Healthy School Canteen Environment among Primary School Children in Malaysia. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Frequency of breakfast and its significant associations with dietary KAP among all students. * Adjusted by gender, grade, nutritional status, only children, and parental education. Abbreviation: KAP = knowledge, attitude, and practice, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Figure 1. Frequency of breakfast and its significant associations with dietary KAP among all students. * Adjusted by gender, grade, nutritional status, only children, and parental education. Abbreviation: KAP = knowledge, attitude, and practice, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Nutrients 17 02424 g001
Figure 2. Types of breakfast foods and their significant associations with dietary KAP among all students. * Adjusted by gender, grade, nutritional status, only children, and parental education. Abbreviation: KAP = knowledge, attitude, and practice, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Figure 2. Types of breakfast foods and their significant associations with dietary KAP among all students. * Adjusted by gender, grade, nutritional status, only children, and parental education. Abbreviation: KAP = knowledge, attitude, and practice, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Nutrients 17 02424 g002
Table 1. Questions regarding each item in the nutritional knowledge section.
Table 1. Questions regarding each item in the nutritional knowledge section.
Items
K1: Which nutrient, besides carbohydrate and fat, serves a source of energy?
K2: Which of the following foods is a primary source of carbohydrates?
K3: What proportion of daily energy intake should be provided by breakfast for school-aged children?
K4: What is the function of dietary fiber?
K5: Which of the following foods is rich in dietary fiber?
K6: Among animal-based food, which has the highest nutritional value?
K7: What is the recommended daily limit for salt consumption?
K8: Which of the following foods is a source of high-quality protein?
K9: Which dairy products is considered the most nutritious?
K10: Are trans fatty acids harmful to human body?
K11: Which nutrient in dairy products contribute to bone strength?
K12: What type of food can help prevent iron-deficiency anemia?
K13: Which vitamin is beneficial for the healing of oral ulcers?
K14: Can fruit juice fully replace fresh fruits in the diet?
K15: Which vitamin in cereal grains helps regulate the nervous system?
K16: Is soybean protein considered a high-quality protein?
K17: For school-aged children, what is the recommended daily limit for added sugar intake?
K18: What is the recommended duration of daily physical activity for school-aged children?
K19: Are you familiar with nutrition labels on food packages?
K20: Do you believe that eating healthy meals is important for overall health?
Table 2. Detailed questionnaire items related to nutritional attitudes and practices.
Table 2. Detailed questionnaire items related to nutritional attitudes and practices.
Nutritional Attitude
Attitude towards non-preferred foodsAre you willing to try foods that are not your favorite? (Willing to try most of the time, Willing to try occasionally, Always unwilling to try)
Sources of dietary knowledgeWhat are your sources of dietary knowledge? (Multiple choice) (Television/Internet, School clubs/Large scale events, Newspapers/Magazines/Books, Classroom instruction, Home, Other)
Dietary activities participationHas the school or class ever organized any of the following dietary-related activities? (Multiple choice) (Class meetings focused on diet, Specialized dietary education courses, Integration of dietary knowledge into other subjects, Series of informative dietary lectures, Cooking activities, Dietary knowledge competition, Other, None of the above apply)
Attitude towards participating in dietary activitiesAre you inclined to participate in the dietary activities organized by your school? (Interested, Neutral, Uninterested)
Expectation of nutritional adequacyDo you expect your diet to meet your nutritional requirements? (Yes, No, Indifferent)
Attitude towards changing unhealthy eating habitsDo you want to change your unhealthy eating habits? (Yes, No, Indifferent)
Parental dietary expectationWhat dietary expectations do your parentes have for you? (Eating whatever I like, Not picky, Not picky and being informed about the nutritional content of different foods)
Perception of body shapeHow would you describe your body shape? (Normal, Thin, Obese)
Satisfaction with body shapeAre you satisfied with your body shape? (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Not satisfied, Very dissatisfied)
Perception of obesityWhat is your opinion on obesity? (Obesity is positively correlated with health, Obesity is negatively correlated with health, Obesity has no correlation with health)
Perceived causes of obesityWhich factors do you believe contribute to obesity? (Multiple choice) (Genetics, Excessive energy intake, Insufficient physical activity, Picky eating, Irregular eating patterns)
Nutritional practice
Frequency of breakfastDuring the past week, how often did you have breakfast? (Everyday, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Reasons for skipping breakfastDuring the past week, what were the reasons for not having breakfast? (Applicable only to students who did not select ‘everyday’ in the previous question) (Lack of time, Fullness or loss of appetite, No breakfast preparation available, Dietary considerations for weight loss)
Types of breakfast foodsWhich of the following food categories were included in your breakfast on each occasion? (Multiple choices) (Grains, Vegetables, Fruits, Meats, Eggs, Beans, Milk, Nuts)
Choice of thirst-quenching drinks During the past week, when you were thirsty, which of the following drinks did you choose most often? (Water, Tea, Cola/Sprite/Juice/Milk tea or other sweetened beverages, Milk)
Daily water intakeDuring the past week, what was your average daily consumption of water(including puried or mineral water)? (≥1100 mL, 600–1000 mL, 200–600 mL, ≤200 mL)
Milk consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you consume milk or milk products? (≥2 bottles/d, 1 bottle/d, 1 bottle every 1–2 days, 1 bottle of every 3–5 days, 1 bottle of every 6–7 days, never) (each bottle ≈ 250 mL)
Egg consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat eggs? (≥2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Staple food consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat staple foods (such as cereals and potatoes)? (3 times/d, 2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–5 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Meat consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat meat (e.g., pork, beef, lamb, chicken, duck, fish, etc.)? (3 times/d, 2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–5 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Bean product consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you consume beans and products (e.g., tofu, soybean milk, beancurd sheet, etc.)? (3 times/d, 2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Fruit consumptionDuring the past week, how much fruit did you eat per day on average (The edible portion of a medium apple is about 200 g)? (≥400 g/d, 300–400 g/d, 200–300 g/d, 100–200 g/d, <100 g/d)
Nut consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat nuts (e.g., seeds, almonds, walnuts, etc.)? (Everyday, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Vegetable consumptionDuring the past week, how many different types of vegetables did you eat per day? (≥5 types/d, 3–4 types/d, 1–2 types/d)
Sugared beverage consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you consume sugared beverages (e.g., cola, soda, juice drinks, functional drinks, lactic acid drinks, milk tea, etc.)? (≥2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Amount of sugared beverage intakeDuring the past week, what was the average amount of each sugared beverage consumed? (Open-ended question)
Western fast food consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat Western fast food (e.g., KFC/McDonald’s/Pizza Hut, etc.) or take-out meals? (≥2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
High-calorie snack consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat high-calorie snacks (e.g., chips, candy, jellies, cookies, spicy bars, puffed foods, etc.)? (≥2 times/d, 1 time/d, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Nighttime snack consumptionDuring the past week, how often did you eat nighttime snacks? (1 time/d, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Diet-related practice
Help with food preparationDuring the past week, how often did you assist in food preparation tasks (e.g., shopping, washing ingredients, setting utensils, etc.) while your family was cooking? (Everyday, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Types of dishes cookedHow many different kinds of dishes can you prepare independently? (None, Limited to rice only, 1–2 types, 3–4 types, 5–9 types, ≥10 types)
Cooking criteria rankingBased on your experience, please rank the following factors according to their importance when cooking a dish: Degree of liking, Color appearance, Flavor and taste, Availability of ingredients, Nutritional value
Cooking frequencyHow often do you participate in cooking activities, such as preparing rice or cooking dishes, either independently or by assisting your family at home? (Everyday, 3–6 times/w, 1–2 times/w, Never)
Checking expiration dates When purchasing food at the supermarket, do you check the expiration dates? (Always check the date and packaging carefully, Occasionally check the date and packaging, Never check, Not applicable due to no personal purchases)
Physical activity
Vigorous physical activityDuring the past week, on how many days did you engage in vigorous physical activity (e.g., basketball, soccer, running, swimming, fast biking, brisk dancing, etc.) for more than 60 min, resulting in sweating and increased breathing? (7 d, 6 d, 5 d, 4 d, 3 d, 2 d, 1 d, 0 d)
Daily physical activityDuring the past week, how much time did you spend on physical activity per day, including recess, PE classes, extracurricular sports, and commuting to and from school? (≥2 h, 1–2 h, 0.5–1 h, ≤0.5 h)
Physical activity during recessDuring the past week, how did you typically spend your recess time? (Engaged in reading or homework, Sat quietly or chatted with classmates, Played with classmates inside the classroom, Engaged in outdoor activities)
Daily sleep durationDuring the past week, what was your average daily sleep duration, including naps? (≥9 h, 7–8 h, ≤7 h)
Table 3. Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics between individuals who skip breakfast and those who consume breakfast daily.
Table 3. Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics between individuals who skip breakfast and those who consume breakfast daily.
VariablesTotalEating DailySkipping Breakfastχ2 (t)p
(n = 1449)(n = 1315)(n = 134)
Demographic characteristics
Sex, n (%) 0.120.73
Male780 (53.83)706 (53.69)74 (55.22)
Female669 (46.17)609 (46.31)60 (44.78)
Age, n (%) 12.890.005 *
Ninth298 (20.57)256 (19.47)42 (31.34)
Tenth519 (35.82)470 (35.74)49 (36.57)
Eleventh463 (31.95)432 (32.85)31 (23.13)
Twelfth169 (11.66)157 (11.94)12 (8.96)
Grade, n (%) 17.45<0.001 *
Fourth532 (36.71)461 (35.06)71 (52.99)
Fifth562 (38.79)520 (39.54)42 (31.34)
Sixth355 (24.50)334 (25.40)21 (15.67)
Nutritional status, n (%) 2.290.52
Thin160 (11.04)143 (10.87)17 (12.69)
Normal867 (59.83)782 (59.47)85 (63.43)
Overweight180 (12.42)165 (12.55)15 (11.19)
Obesity242 (16.70)225 (17.11)17 (12.69)
Whether only child, n (%) 1.550.21
Yes440 (30.37)393 (29.89)47 (35.07)
No1009 (69.63)922 (70.11)87 (64.93)
Maternal education, n (%) 0.140.71
College degree or below941 (64.94)852 (64.79)89 (66.42)
Bachelor’s degree or above508 (35.06)463 (35.21)45 (33.58)
Paternal education, n (%) 0.410.52
College degree or below838 (57.83)757 (57.57)81 (60.45)
Bachelor’s degree or above611 (42.17)558 (42.43)53 (39.55)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Comparison of nutritional knowledge, attitude, and practice between individuals who skip breakfast and those who consume breakfast daily.
Table 4. Comparison of nutritional knowledge, attitude, and practice between individuals who skip breakfast and those who consume breakfast daily.
VariablesTotalEating DailySkipping Breakfastχ2 (t)p
(n = 1449)(n = 1315)(n = 134)
Nutrition knowledge score, M (P25, P75)13.00
(10.00, 16.00)
13.00
(10.00, 16.00)
13.50
(11.00, 16.00)
1.730.08
Nutritional attitude
Attitude towards non-preferred foods, n (%) 15.13<0.001 *
Willing to try most of the time584 (40.30)550 (41.83)34 (25.37)
Willing to try occasionally756 (52.17)672 (51.10)84 (62.69)
Always unwilling to try109 (7.52)93 (7.07)16 (11.94)
Attitude towards participating in dietary activities, n (%) 21.26<0.001 *
Interested629 (48.87)592 (50.47)37 (32.46)
Neutral578 (44.91)517 (44.08)61 (53.51)
Uninterested80 (6.22)64 (5.46)16 (14.04)
Expectation of nutritional adequacy, n (%) 7.370.025 *
Yes1036 (71.50)951 (72.32)85 (63.43)
Indifferent204 (14.08)175 (13.31)29 (21.64)
No209 (14.42)189 (14.37)20 (14.93)
Attitude towards changing unhealthy eating habits, n (%) 25.54<0.001 *
Yes925 (63.84)856 (65.10)69 (51.49)
Indifferent291 (20.08)268 (20.38)23 (17.16)
No233 (16.08)191 (14.52)42 (31.34)
Satisfaction with body shape, n (%) 3.210.20
Satisfied833 (57.49)747 (56.81)86 (64.18)
Neutral459 (31.68)421 (32.02)38 (28.36)
Unsatisfied157 (10.84)147 (11.18)10 (7.46)
Nutritional practice (over the past week)
Types of breakfast foods, n (%) 9.610.008 *
≥5 types/d538 (37.13)503 (38.25)35 (26.12)
2–4 types/d776 (53.55)696 (52.93)80 (59.70)
≤1 type/d135 (9.32)116 (8.82)19 (14.18)
Choice of thirst-quenching drinks, n (%) 26.66<0.001 *
Water1204 (83.09)1114 (84.71)90 (67.16)
Tea, sugared beverages, milk, etc.245 (16.91)201 (15.29)44 (32.84)
Daily water intake, n (%) 2.610.11
≥1100 mL/d691 (47.69)636 (48.37)55 (41.04)
<1100 mL/d758 (52.31)679 (51.63)79 (58.96)
Milk consumption, n (%) 3.240.07
≥1 bottle/d956 (65.98)877 (66.69)79 (58.96)
<1 bottle/d493 (34.02)438 (33.31)55 (41.04)
Egg consumption, n (%) 6.920.009 *
≥1 per day363 (25.05)342 (26.01)21 (15.67)
<1 per day1086 (74.95)973 (73.99)113 (84.33)
Staple food consumption, n (%) 11.7<0.001 *
4–7 times/w430 (29.68)373 (28.37)57 (42.54)
1–3 times/w1019 (70.32)942 (71.63)77 (57.46)
Meat consumption, n (%) 1.270.26
4–7 times/w343 (23.67)306 (23.27)37 (27.61)
1–3 times/w1106 (76.33)1009 (76.73)97 (72.39)
Bean products consumption, n (%) 0.10.75
4–7 times/w1010 (69.70)915 (69.58)95 (70.90)
1–3 times/w439 (30.30)400 (30.42)39 (29.10)
Fruit consumption, n (%) 6.510.04 *
≥400 g/d415 (28.64)389 (29.58)26 (19.40)
200–400 g/d779 (53.76)700 (53.23)79 (58.96)
<200 g/d255 (17.60)226 (17.19)29 (21.64)
Nut consumption, n (%) 14.890.001 *
≥3 times/w493 (34.02)453 (34.45)40 (29.85)
1–2 times/w716 (49.41)660 (50.19)56 (41.79)
Never240 (16.56)202 (15.36)38 (28.36)
Vegetable consumption, n (%) 16.35<0.001 *
≥5 types/d539 (37.20)507 (38.56)32 (23.88)
3–4 types/d667 (46.03)601 (45.70)66 (49.25)
1–2 types/d243 (16.77)207 (15.74)36 (26.87)
Sugared beverage consumption, n (%) 3.890.04 *
≤2 times/w1249 (86.20)1141 (86.77)108 (80.60)
≥3 times/w200 (13.80)174 (13.23)26 (19.40)
Western fast food consumption, n (%) 0.230.63
≤2 times/w1355 (93.51)1231 (93.61)124 (92.54)
≥3 times/w94 (6.49)84 (6.39)10 (7.46)
High-calorie snack consumption, n (%) 1.550.21
≤2 times/w1081 (74.60)987 (75.06)94 (70.15)
≥3 times/w368 (25.40)328 (24.94)40 (29.85)
Nighttime snack consumption, n (%) 15.46<0.001 *
≤2 times/w883 (61.96)821 (63.59)62 (46.27)
≥3 times/w542 (38.04)470 (36.41)72 (53.73)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Comparison of dietary practices between individuals who skip breakfast and those who consume breakfast daily.
Table 5. Comparison of dietary practices between individuals who skip breakfast and those who consume breakfast daily.
VariablesTotalEating DailySkipping Breakfastχ2p
(n = 1449)(n = 1315)(n = 134)
Diet-related practice (over the past week)
Help with food preparation, n (%) 12.50.006 *
Everyday501 (34.58)471 (35.82)30 (22.39)
3–6 times/w400 (27.61)363 (27.60)37 (27.61)
1–2 times/w423 (29.19)373 (28.37)50 (37.31)
Never125 (8.63)108 (8.21)17 (12.69)
Types of dishes cooked, n (%) 0.730.69
≥3 types907 (62.59)827 (62.89)80 (59.70)
1–2 types453 (31.26)409 (31.10)44 (32.84)
None89 (6.14)79 (6.01)10 (7.46)
Cooking frequency, n (%) 13.130.004 *
Everyday278 (19.19)262 (19.92)16 (11.94)
3–6 times/w336 (23.19)313 (23.80)23 (17.16)
1–2 times/w700 (48.31)625 (47.53)75 (55.97)
Never135 (9.32)115 (8.75)20 (14.93)
Checking expiration dates, n (%) 22.59<0.001 *
Always992 (68.46)923 (70.19)69 (51.49)
Occasionally348 (24.02)303 (23.04)45 (33.58)
Never109 (7.52)89 (6.77)20 (14.93)
Physical activity (over the past week)
Vigorous physical activity, n (%) 10.610.005 *
Everyday630 (43.48)585 (44.49)45 (33.58)
4–6 days504 (34.78)458 (34.83)46 (34.33)
1–3 days & Never315 (21.74)272 (20.68)43 (32.09)
Daily physical activity, n (%) 3.60.17
≥2 h425 (29.33)394 (29.96)31 (23.13)
1–2 h763 (52.66)690 (52.47)73 (54.48)
≤1 h261 (18.01)231 (17.57)30 (22.39)
Physical activity during recess, n (%) 5.940.02 *
Yes740 (51.07)685 (52.09)55 (41.04)
No709 (48.93)630 (47.91)79 (58.96)
Daily sleep duration, n (%) 2.450.12
≥9 h677 (46.72)623 (47.38)54 (40.30)
≤8 h772 (53.28)692 (52.62)80 (59.70)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Frequency of breakfast and its associations with dietary KAP among all students.
Table 6. Frequency of breakfast and its associations with dietary KAP among all students.
VariableFrequency of Breakfast for All Students
OR (95%CI)AOR * (95%CI)
Nutrition knowledge score1.009 (0.951–1.071) 1.002 (0.943–1.065)
Nutritional attitude
Attitude towards non-preferred foods
Willing to try most of the time0.676 (0.311–1.468) 0.718 (0.327–1.576)
Willing to try occasionally0.897 (0.452–1.783) 0.938 (0.465–1.892)
Always unwilling to tryRef. Ref.
Attitude towards participating in dietary activities
Interested0.424 (0.191–0.939) 0.420 (0.186–0.948)
Neutral0.540 (0.26–1.119) 0.557 (0.265–1.171)
UninterestedRef. Ref.
Expectation of nutritional adequacy
Yes1.208 (0.598–2.441) 1.085 (0.525–2.242)
Indifferent0.858 (0.401–1.837) 0.859 (0.395–1.867)
NoRef. Ref.
Attitude towards changing unhealthy eating habits
Yes0.439 (0.233–0.825) 0.434 (0.226–0.835)
Indifferent0.333 (0.166–0.665) 0.312 (0.152–0.639)
NoRef. Ref.
Satisfaction with body shape
Satisfied1.034 (0.475–2.253) 1.027 (0.464–2.269)
Neutral0.837 (0.366–1.915) 0.843 (0.363–1.961)
UnsatisfiedRef. Ref.
Nutritional practice (over the past week)
Types of breakfast foods
≥5 types/d0.614 (0.289–1.304) 0.559 (0.259–1.205)
2–4 types/d0.620 (0.316–1.216) 0.528 (0.265–1.052)
≤1 type/dRef. Ref.
Choice of thirst-quenching drinks
Water0.420 (0.261–0.675) 0.404 (0.248–0.659)
Others (Tea, sugared beverages, milk, etc.)Ref. Ref.
Daily water intake
≥1100 mL/d1.172 (0.745–1.846) 1.106 (0.694–1.765)
<1100 mL/dRef. Ref.
Milk consumption
≥1 bottle/d1.042 (0.664–1.637) 1.056 (0.668–1.670)
<1 bottle/dRef. Ref.
Egg consumption
≥1 per day0.867 (0.493–1.523) 0.836 (0.468–1.492)
<1 per dayRef. Ref.
Staple food consumption
4–7 times/w1.407 (0.883–2.244) 1.426 (0.885–2.298)
1–3 times/wRef. Ref.
Meat consumption
4–7 times/w0.868 (0.516–1.463) 0.870 (0.508–1.488)
1–3 times/wRef. Ref.
Bean products consumption
4–7 times/w0.839 (0.514–1.370) 0.853 (0.519–1.404)
1–3 times/wRef. Ref.
Fruit consumption
≥400 g/d1.016 (0.495–2.086) 1.106 (0.531–2.306)
200–400 g/d1.746 (0.975–3.129) 1.762 (0.969–3.201)
<200 g/dRef. Ref.
Nut consumption
≥3 times/w0.589 (0.320–1.083) 0.607 (0.326–1.132)
1–2 times/w0.542 (0.316–0.932) 0.541 (0.312–0.940)
NeverRef. Ref.
Vegetable consumption
≥5 types/d0.496 (0.270–0.914) 0.525 (0.283–0.975)
3–4 types/d0.654 (0.381–1.121) 0.657 (0.380–1.136)
1–2 types/dRef. Ref.
Sugared beverage consumption
≤2 times/w1.204 (0.649–2.236) 1.197 (0.641–2.236)
≥3 times/wRef. Ref.
Western fast food consumption
≤2 times/w1.567 (0.650–3.778) 1.543 (0.630–3.782)
≥3 times/wRef. Ref.
High-calorie snack consumption
≤2 times/w0.905 (0.549–1.492) 0.905 (0.544–1.506)
≥3 times/wRef. Ref.
Nighttime snack consumption
≤2 times/w0.517 (0.334–0.800) 0.514 (0.329–0.804)
≥3 times/wRef. Ref.
Diet-related practice (over the past week)
Help with food preparation
Everyday1.264 (0.513–3.116) 1.305 (0.514–3.311)
3–6 times/w1.464 (0.624–3.435) 1.428 (0.593–3.440)
1–2 times/w1.279 (0.578–2.830) 1.263 (0.560–2.846)
NeverRef. Ref.
Types of dishes cooked
≥3 types3.271 (1.119–9.563) 2.695 (0.904–8.035)
1–2 types1.828 (0.637–5.251) 1.609 (0.551–4.700)
NoneRef. Ref.
Cooking frequency
Everyday0.267 (0.096–0.742) 0.263 (0.093–0.745)
3–6 times/w0.433 (0.172–1.091) 0.444 (0.174–1.134)
1–2 times/w0.642 (0.292–1.409) 0.629 (0.283–1.394)
NeverRef. Ref.
Checking expiration dates
Always0.400 (0.206–0.776) 0.375 (0.190–0.740)
Occasionally0.726 (0.370–1.426) 0.687 (0.344–1.370)
NeverRef. Ref.
Physical activity (over the past week)
Vigorous physical activity
Everyday0.782 (0.437–1.401) 0.743 (0.406–1.359)
4–6 days0.607 (0.347–1.060) 0.623 (0.351–1.108)
1–3 days & NeverRef. Ref.
Daily physical activity
≥2 h1.006 (0.511–1.981) 1.058 (0.531–2.107)
1–2 h0.940 (0.546–1.619) 0.933 (0.537–1.622)
≤1 hRef. Ref.
Physical activity during recess
Yes0.538 (0.347–0.833) 0.572 (0.365–0.896)
NoRef. Ref.
Daily sleep duration
≥9 h1.082 (0.670–1.748) 1.106 (0.678–1.806)
≤8 hRef. Ref.
*: Adjusted by gender, grade, nutritional status, only children, and parental education level. KAP = knowledge, attitude, and practice, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Table 7. Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
Table 7. Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
VariablesTypes of Breakfast Foodsχ2 (F)p
≤1
(n = 135)
2–4
(n = 776)
≥5
(n = 538)
Sex, n (%) 0.620.74
Male77 (57.04)415 (53.48)288 (53.53)
Female58 (42.96)361 (46.52)250 (46.47)
Age, n (%) 19.760.003 *
Ninth15 (11.11)185 (23.84)98 (18.22)
Tenth58 (42.96)280 (36.08)181 (33.64)
Eleventh48 (35.56)224 (28.87)191 (35.50)
Twelfth14 (10.37)87 (11.21)68 (12.64)
Grade, n (%) 27.87<0.001 *
Fourth35 (25.93)308 (39.69)189 (35.13)
Fifth70 (51.85)307 (39.56)185 (34.39)
Sixth30 (22.22)161 (20.75)164 (30.48)
Nutritional status, n (%) 7.100.31
Thin10 (7.41)96 (12.37)54 (10.04)
Normal90 (66.67)452 (58.25)325 (60.41)
Overweight13 (9.63)104 (13.40)63 (11.71)
Obesity22 (16.30)124 (15.98)96 (17.84)
Whether only child, n (%) 0.660.72
Yes38 (28.15)242 (31.19)160 (29.74)
No97 (71.85)534 (68.81)378 (70.26)
Maternal education, n (%) 5.870.05
College degree or below98 (72.59)510 (65.72)333 (61.90)
Bachelor’s degree or above37 (27.41)266 (34.28)205 (38.10)
Paternal education, n (%) 4.000.14
College degree or below89 (65.93)443 (57.09)306 (56.88)
Bachelor’s degree or above46 (34.07)333 (42.91)232 (43.12)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 8. Comparison of nutritional knowledge and attitude among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
Table 8. Comparison of nutritional knowledge and attitude among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
VariablesTypes of Breakfast Foodsχ2 (F)p
≤1
(n = 135)
2–4
(n = 776)
≥5
(n = 538)
Nutrition knowledge score,
M (P25, P75)
14.00
(11.00, 17.00)
13.00
(11.00, 16.00)
12.00
(10.00, 15.00)
24.75 #<0.001 *
Nutritional attitude
Attitude towards non-preferred foods, n (%) 47.05<0.001 *
Willing to try most of the time40 (29.63)270 (34.79)274 (50.93)
Willing to try occasionally77 (57.04)441 (56.83)238 (44.24)
Always unwilling to try18 (13.33)65 (8.38)26 (4.83)
Attitude towards participating in dietary activities, n (%) 83.69<0.001 *
Interested27 (23.89)286 (42.25)316 (63.58)
Neutral77 (68.14)341 (50.37)160 (32.19)
Uninterested9 (7.96)50 (7.39)21 (4.23)
Expectation of nutritional adequacy, n (%) 35.49<0.001 *
Yes80 (59.26)525 (67.65)431 (80.11)
Indifferent28 (20.74)126 (16.24)50 (9.29)
No27 (20.00)125 (16.11)57 (10.59)
Attitude towards changing unhealthy eating habits, n (%) 41.28<0.001 *
Yes64 (47.41)467 (60.18)394 (73.23)
Indifferent41 (30.37)173 (22.29)77 (14.31)
No30 (22.22)136 (17.53)67 (12.45)
Satisfaction with body shape,
n (%)
6.250.18
Satisfied86 (63.70)450 (57.99)297 (55.20)
Neutral34 (25.19)252 (32.47)173 (32.16)
Unsatisfied15 (11.11)74 (9.54)68 (12.64)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05). # Kruskal–Wallis test.
Table 9. Comparison of nutritional practices among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
Table 9. Comparison of nutritional practices among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
VariablesTypes of Breakfast Foodsχ2p
≤1
(n = 135)
2–4
(n = 776)
≥5
(n = 538)
Nutritional practice (over the past week)
Choice of thirst-quenching drinks, n (%) 7.380.03 *
Water102 (75.56)643 (82.86)459 (85.32)
Tea, sugared beverages, milk, etc.33 (24.44)133 (17.14)79 (14.68)
Daily water intake, n (%) 73.52<0.001 *
≥1100 mL/d40 (29.63)319 (41.11)332 (61.71)
<1100 mL/d95 (70.37)457 (58.89)206 (38.29)
Milk consumption, n (%) 24.42<0.001 *
≥1 bottle/d82 (60.74)476 (61.34)398 (73.98)
<1 bottle/d53 (39.26)300 (38.66)140 (26.02)
Egg consumption, n (%) 55.42<0.001 *
≥1 per day23 (17.04)146 (18.81)194 (36.06)
<1 per day112 (82.96)630 (81.19)344 (63.94)
Staple food consumption, n (%) 42.03<0.001 *
4–7 times/w56 (41.48)267 (34.41)107 (19.89)
1–3 times/w79 (58.52)509 (65.59)431 (80.11)
Meat consumption, n (%) 26.19<0.001 *
4–7 times/w49 (36.30)201 (25.90)93 (17.29)
1–3 times/w86 (63.70)575 (74.10)445 (82.71)
Bean products consumption, n (%) 3.680.16
4–7 times/w98 (72.59)553 (71.26)359 (66.73)
1–3 times/w37 (27.41)223 (28.74)179 (33.27)
Fruit consumption, n (%) 46.79<0.001 *
≥400 g/d29 (21.48)197 (25.39)189 (35.13)
200–400 g/d71 (52.59)410 (52.84)298 (55.39)
<200 g/d35 (25.93)169 (21.78)51 (9.48)
Nut consumption, n (%) 52.22<0.001 *
≥3 times/w35 (25.93)249 (32.09)209 (38.85)
1–2 times/w60 (44.44)371 (47.81)285 (52.97)
Never40 (29.63)156 (20.10)44 (8.18)
Vegetable consumption, n (%) 28.32<0.001 *
≥5 types/d41 (30.37)273 (35.18)225 (41.82)
3–4 types/d57 (42.22)356 (45.88)254 (47.21)
1–2 types/d37 (27.41)147 (18.94)59 (10.97)
Sugared beverage consumption, n (%) 22.92<0.001 *
≤2 times/w99 (73.33)670 (86.34)480 (89.22)
≥3 times/w36 (26.67)106 (13.66)58 (10.78)
Western fast food consumption, n (%) 14.15<0.001 *
≤2 times/w116 (85.93)731 (94.20)508 (94.42)
≥3 times/w19 (14.07)45 (5.80)30 (5.58)
High-calorie snack consumption, n (%) 8.780.012 *
≤2 times/w96 (71.11)560 (72.16)425 (79.00)
≥3 times/w39 (28.89)216 (27.84)113 (21.00)
Nighttime snack consumption, n (%) 13.330.001 *
≤2 times/w77 (57.89)444 (58.42)362 (68.05)
≥3 times/w56 (42.11)316 (41.58)170 (31.95)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 10. Comparison of dietary practices among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
Table 10. Comparison of dietary practices among individuals who consume different types of breakfast foods.
VariablesTypes of Breakfast Foodsχ2p
≤1
(n = 135)
2–4
(n = 776)
≥5
(n = 538)
Diet-related practice (over the past week)
Help with food preparation, n (%) 66.72<0.001 *
Everyday34 (25.19)217 (27.96)250 (46.47)
3–6 times/w34 (25.19)224 (28.87)142 (26.39)
1–2 times/w49 (36.30)253 (32.60)121 (22.49)
Never18 (13.33)82 (10.57)25 (4.65)
Types of dishes cooked, n (%) 44.74<0.001 *
≥3 types59 (43.70)468 (60.31)380 (70.63)
1–2 types58 (42.96)254 (32.73)141 (26.21)
None18 (13.33)54 (6.96)17 (3.16)
Cooking frequency, n (%) 38.64<0.001 *
Eveyday24 (17.78)124 (15.98)130 (24.16)
3–6 times/w30 (22.22)161 (20.75)145 (26.95)
1–2 times/w61 (45.19)404 (52.06)235 (43.68)
Never20 (14.81)87 (11.21)28 (5.20)
Checking expiration dates, n (%) 51.43<0.001 *
Always68 (50.37)503 (64.82)421 (78.25)
Occasionally47 (34.81)210 (27.06)91 (16.91)
Never20 (14.81)63 (8.12)26 (4.83)
Physical activity (over the past week)
Vigorous physical activity, n (%) 65.71<0.001 *
Everyday48 (35.56)279 (35.95)303 (56.32)
4–6 days46 (34.07)296 (38.14)162 (30.11)
1–3 days & Never41 (30.37)201 (25.90)73 (13.57)
Daily physical activity, n (%) 60.74<0.001 *
≥2 h21 (15.56)196 (25.26)208 (38.66)
1–2 h75 (55.56)414 (53.35)274 (50.93)
≤1 h39 (28.89)166 (21.39)56 (10.41)
Physical activity during recess, n (%) 3.570.17
Yes75 (55.56)379 (48.84)286 (53.16)
No60 (44.44)397 (51.16)252 (46.84)
Daily sleep duration, n (%) 62.48<0.001 *
≥9 h43 (31.85)312 (40.21)322 (59.85)
≤8 h92 (68.15)464 (59.79)216 (40.15)
* Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 11. Types of breakfast foods and their associations with dietary KAP among all students.
Table 11. Types of breakfast foods and their associations with dietary KAP among all students.
VariableTypes of Breakfast Foods for All Students
2 ≤ Types ≤ 4Types ≥ 5
OR (95%CI)AOR * ( 95%CI)OR (95%CI)AOR * (95%CI)
Nutrition knowledge score0.917 (0.86–0.978)0.917 (0.859–0.979)0.855 (0.798–0.916)0.854 (0.796–0.915)
Nutritional attitude
Attitude towards non-preferred foods
Willing to try most of the time1.589 (0.743–3.397)1.592 (0.734–3.451)2.365 (1.004–5.569)2.476 (1.038–5.905)
Willing to try occasionally1.499 (0.760–2.956)1.440 (0.720–2.883)1.989 (0.906–4.365)1.974 (0.888–4.390)
Always unwilling to tryRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.5610.5160.1470.121
Attitude towards participating in dietary activities
Interested1.055 (0.414–2.691)1.023 (0.392–2.669)1.418 (0.502–4.004)1.231 (0.424–3.573)
Neutral0.568 (0.244–1.320)0.578 (0.243–1.375)0.547 (0.211–1.418)0.510 (0.192–1.360)
UninterestedRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.2300.2090.0240.030
Expectation of nutritional adequacy
Yes0.863 (0.408–1.825)0.823 (0.381–1.775)0.831 (0.357–1.933)0.835 (0.351–1.986)
Indifferent1.083 (0.519–2.260)1.044 (0.496–2.197)1.068 (0.457–2.496)0.996 (0.422–2.349)
NoRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.6820.6320.6870.693
Attitude towards changing unhealthy eating habits
Yes1.054 (0.505–2.199)1.104 (0.522–2.335)1.022 (0.457–2.283)1.065 (0.469–2.417)
Indifferent0.630 (0.321–1.234)0.661 (0.335–1.304)0.612 (0.285–1.316)0.663 (0.306–1.437)
NoRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.6420.6550.6500.621
Satisfaction with body shape
Satisfied1.100 (0.529–2.289)1.019 (0.481–2.158)0.900 (0.417–1.943)0.823 (0.374–1.811)
Neutral1.371 (0.623–3.020)1.256 (0.559–2.821)1.071 (0.467–2.460)0.923 (0.393–2.165)
UnsatisfiedRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.8520.9020.6590.741
Nutritional practice (over the past week)
Choice of thirst-quenching drinks
Water1.361 (0.804–2.306)1.385 (0.809–2.372)1.182 (0.662–2.110)1.206 (0.667–2.179)
Others (Tea, sugared beverages, milk, etc.)Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Daily water intake
≥1100 mL/d1.287 (0.788–2.100)1.252 (0.763–2.054)1.958 (1.167–3.286)1.971 (1.168–3.327)
<1100 mL/dRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Milk consumption
≥1 bottle/d0.742 (0.462–1.190)0.709 (0.439–1.146)0.911 (0.544–1.526)0.852 (0.505–1.436)
<1 bottle/dRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Egg consumption
≥1 per day0.946 (0.528–1.695)0.908 (0.504–1.636)1.426 (0.779–2.609)1.474 (0.801–2.710)
<1 per dayRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Staple food consumption
4–7 times/w0.862 (0.536–1.386)0.857 (0.530–1.385)0.497 (0.294–0.838)0.515 (0.303–0.875)
1–3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Meat consumption
4–7 times/w0.585 (0.362–0.945)0.607 (0.373–0.985)0.535 (0.314–0.913)0.529 (0.308–0.909)
1–3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Bean products consumption
4–7 times/w0.971 (0.573–1.645)0.948 (0.557–1.614)1.100 (0.63–1.921)1.026 (0.584–1.801)
1–3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Fruit consumption
≥400 g/d1.211 (0.618–2.373)1.215 (0.616–2.398)1.858 (0.886–3.898)1.827 (0.862–3.869)
200–400 g/d1.121 (0.658–1.910)1.119 (0.652–1.918)1.620 (0.876–2.993)1.700 (0.913–3.167)
<200 g/dRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Nut consumption
≥3 times/w1.801 (0.923–3.517)1.755 (0.891–3.458)3.038 (1.428–6.464)2.879 (1.341–6.181)
1–2 times/w1.091 (0.634–1.879)1.098 (0.633–1.904)2.016 (1.061–3.831)2.031 (1.061–3.891)
NeverRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.0670.0810.0120.018
Vegetable consumption
≥5 types/d1.331 (0.715–2.478)1.328 (0.706–2.497)1.298 (0.653–2.579)1.272 (0.634–2.553)
3–4 types/d1.487 (0.849–2.602)1.486 (0.839–2.632)1.669 (0.888–3.139)1.700 (0.895–3.229)
1–2 types/dRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.5740.6240.8670.976
Sugared beverage consumption
≤2 times/w1.881 (1.014–3.489)1.766 (0.940–3.317)2.044 (1.034–4.040)1.822 (0.910–3.647)
≥3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Western fast food consumption
≤2 times/w1.619 (0.731–3.585)1.487 (0.660–3.354)1.188 (0.495–2.852)1.114 (0.455–2.724)
≥3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
High-calorie snack consumption
≤2 times/w0.909 (0.530–1.556)0.938 (0.544–1.616)1.168 (0.652–2.094)1.201 (0.666–2.166)
≥3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Nighttime snack consumption
≤2 times/w0.710 (0.444–1.134)0.723 (0.450–1.163)0.894 (0.539–1.481)0.899 (0.539–1.499)
≥3 times/wRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Diet-related practice (over the past week)
Help with food preparation
Everyday0.767 (0.307–1.918)0.791 (0.312–2.001)1.225 (0.429–3.498)1.137 (0.394–3.283)
3–6 times/w0.847 (0.348–2.060)0.886 (0.361–2.173)0.887 (0.316–2.488)0.835 (0.295–2.362)
1–2 times/w0.732 (0.326–1.643)0.731 (0.323–1.657)0.788 (0.303–2.052)0.706 (0.269–1.856)
NeverRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.7490.7530.2590.252
Types of dishes cooked
≥3 types2.568 (1.138–5.795)2.301 (1.001–5.292)3.917 (1.467–10.458)3.775 (1.389–10.258)
1–2 types1.323 (0.610–2.871)1.263 (0.573–2.784)1.751 (0.675–4.547)1.741 (0.661–4.588)
NoneRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.0010.003<0.001<0.001
Cooking frequency
Everyday0.603 (0.235–1.547)0.632 (0.243–1.642)0.537 (0.183–1.582)0.615 (0.206–1.837)
3–6 times/w0.539 (0.217–1.340)0.561 (0.222–1.417)0.619 (0.219–1.752)0.768 (0.266–2.213)
1–2 times/w1.033 (0.467–2.287)1.024 (0.457–2.296)1.041 (0.411–2.636)1.127 (0.439–2.889)
NeverRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.0520.0870.0480.076
Checking expiration dates
Always1.946 (0.972–3.897)2.054 (1.017–4.148)2.118 (0.931–4.820)2.145 (0.935–4.919)
Occasionally1.560 (0.757–3.213)1.603 (0.770–3.336)1.674 (0.707–3.968)1.724 (0.721–4.120)
NeverRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.0800.0590.0890.068
Physical activity (over the past week)
Vigorous physical activity
Everyday0.673 (0.375–1.208)0.644 (0.353–1.173)0.947 (0.497–1.806)0.893 (0.460–1.731)
4–6 days1.221 (0.696–2.143)1.234 (0.696–2.187)1.346 (0.715–2.534)1.266 (0.664–2.414)
1–3 days & NeverRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.5070.4790.6290.639
Daily physical activity
≥2 h1.944 (0.916–4.125)1.955 (0.915–4.180)2.777 (1.241–6.212)2.799 (1.240–6.321)
1–2 h1.050 (0.614–1.794)1.070 (0.622–1.841)1.305 (0.714–2.387)1.298 (0.705–2.391)
≤1 hRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
p-trend0.1070.0890.0110.011
Physical activity during recess
Yes0.659 (0.422–1.028)0.675 (0.430–1.059)0.751 (0.466–1.211)0.774 (0.477–1.256)
NoRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
Daily sleep duration
≥9 h1.063 (0.643–1.758)1.079 (0.649–1.793)1.477 (0.866–2.519)1.476 (0.860–2.532)
≤8 hRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
*: Adjusted by gender, grade, nutritional status, only children, and parental education level. KAP = knowledge, attitude, and practice, AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, S.; Zhao, H.; Xiao, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, F.; Xu, B.; Zou, H.; Huang, X.; et al. Association of Breakfast Food Types with Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among School-Aged Children. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152424

AMA Style

Zhou S, Zhao H, Xiao Y, Li J, Huang Q, Zhang Y, Guo F, Xu B, Zou H, Huang X, et al. Association of Breakfast Food Types with Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among School-Aged Children. Nutrients. 2025; 17(15):2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Siyao, Hanqing Zhao, Yu Xiao, Jie Li, Qiaoli Huang, Yufang Zhang, Fengfeng Guo, Beibei Xu, Haoyan Zou, Xiaoxia Huang, and et al. 2025. "Association of Breakfast Food Types with Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among School-Aged Children" Nutrients 17, no. 15: 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152424

APA Style

Zhou, S., Zhao, H., Xiao, Y., Li, J., Huang, Q., Zhang, Y., Guo, F., Xu, B., Zou, H., Huang, X., Huang, S., & Wang, L. (2025). Association of Breakfast Food Types with Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among School-Aged Children. Nutrients, 17(15), 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop