Next Article in Journal
Is There a Role of Beetroot Consumption on the Recovery of Oxidative Status and Muscle Damage in Ultra-Endurance Runners?
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Sodium Restriction and Frailty among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: An 8-Year Longitudinal Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Value of an Ecological Approach to Improve the Precision of Nutritional Assessment: Addressing Contributors and Implications of the “Multiple Burdens of Malnutrition”
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/nu16050581
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Precision Nutrition Unveiled: Gene–Nutrient Interactions, Microbiota Dynamics, and Lifestyle Factors in Obesity Management

by
Samy Mansour
1,
Saif M. I. Alkhaaldi
1,
Ashwin F. Sammanasunathan
1,
Saleh Ibrahim
1,2,
Joviana Farhat
3,* and
Basem Al-Omari
3,*
1
College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates
2
Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
3
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(5), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050581
Submission received: 30 December 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 18 February 2024 / Published: 20 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Nutrition for Population Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Obesity is a complex metabolic disorder that is associated with several diseases. Recently, precision nutrition (PN) has emerged as a tailored approach to provide individualised dietary recommendations. Aim: This review discusses the major intrinsic and extrinsic components considered when applying PN during the management of obesity and common associated chronic conditions. Results: The review identified three main PN components: gene–nutrient interactions, intestinal microbiota, and lifestyle factors. Genetic makeup significantly contributes to inter-individual variations in dietary behaviours, with advanced genome sequencing and population genetics aiding in detecting gene variants associated with obesity. Additionally, PN-based host-microbiota evaluation emerges as an advanced therapeutic tool, impacting disease control and prevention. The gut microbiome’s composition regulates diverse responses to nutritional recommendations. Several studies highlight PN’s effectiveness in improving diet quality and enhancing adherence to physical activity among obese patients. PN is a key strategy for addressing obesity-related risk factors, encompassing dietary patterns, body weight, fat, blood lipids, glucose levels, and insulin resistance. Conclusion: PN stands out as a feasible tool for effectively managing obesity, considering its ability to integrate genetic and lifestyle factors. The application of PN-based approaches not only improves current obesity conditions but also holds promise for preventing obesity and its associated complications in the long term.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a complex metabolic disorder that can present with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidaemias, and cancer [1,2,3]. According to the World Obesity Atlas 2023, 38% of the global population is currently either overweight or obese [4]. This progression of obesity has been primarily associated with the consumption of an unbalanced diet rich in fat and fructose for a long period while adopting a sedentary lifestyle [5,6]. Therefore, weight control is vital to prevent diseases. It is suggested that controlling weight is influenced by the sources and quality of food rather than the quantities consumed in the diet [7]. It is also suggested that the individual’s genetic and epigenetic interactions with dietary intake and physical activity are linked to an increased risk of developing obesity [8,9]. In case of intrinsic disruptions, a high intake of saturated fat or refined carbohydrates results in dysregulation of the central metabolic pathways and increased weight [10,11]. Additionally, the gut microbiota and its interactions with genes and diet can modify the risk of developing obesity [12].
The multifactorial nature of obesity has led to the ongoing application of precision public health approaches to enhance the understanding of the interplay between individuals’ intrinsic components and environmental factors [13]. These precision approaches have been implemented to ameliorate patients’ health and quality of life [14]. In recent years, precision nutrition (PN) was introduced as one of these approaches to provide customised dietary recommendations for individuals based on their genetic profile, microbiota, physical activity, and lifestyle [15,16]. In particular, PN has been applied in metabolic conditions such as obesity to provide individualised metabolic care and clinical nutrition [17]. PN focuses on biological biomarkers characterising each individual to apply more effective and personalised nutritional guidelines [18]. This enables patient subgroups to obtain customised nutritional instructions rather than general recommendations to improve their treatment outcomes [19,20]. In the long term, PN has been associated with a promising potential to extend patients’ health span and limit the burden of healthcare costs [21].
It is worth mentioning that the concept of PN requires a higher degree of certainty compared to other precision approaches [22]. PN provides sufficient information regarding complex correlations between biological factors, food intake, and phenotype to share individualised nutritional advice [23]. This prioritises the application of PN in case of elevated genetic susceptibilities to specific diseases, such as obesity [22]. This review will discuss the major intrinsic and extrinsic components considered when applying PN. This review will also focus on the practical contribution of PN during obesity management and associated common chronic conditions.

2. The Phenotypic and Genotypic Components of PN

In the last couple of years, multiple approaches have been designed to focus on nutrition and food science technology [1]. These advanced methodologies are based on understanding the individual variability in response to foods to provide personalised nutritional recommendations specific to patient subgroups [2]. PN is one of the promising methods that have been used for approaching the variation in individuals’ responses to diet, nutrients, metabolic activity, and treatment outcomes [3]. These variations have been linked primarily to the composition of the gut microbiome, genetics/metabolic profile, and social and lifestyle habits specific to each individual [4]. The gut microbiome has been classified as one of the factors that can predict individuals’ responses to diet and develop an appropriate model for PN [5]. Understanding the variation in genetic and metabolic profiles can also help in providing specific dietary advice for individuals or population subgroups in the form of PN [6]. PN can optimise the dietary response and health by considering the variations in individuals’ social status and lifestyle habits [7].
PN allows a better understanding of the inter-individual differences that are directly correlated to patients’ unique intrinsic factors, including the microbiome as well as the genetic and metabolic profile [8,9,10,11]. Other factors including patients’ health status, physical activity, and dietary pattern, and psychosocial and socioeconomic characteristics can also extrinsically affect the response to dietary behaviours [12,13,14,15], as shown in Figure 1 and explained in the following sections.

2.1. Gut Microbiota

The gut microbiota refers to the intestinal tract microorganisms responsible for the generation of metabolites, stabilisation of homeostasis, and maintenance of adequate immune responses [16,17]. The intestinal microbiota is also connected with the brain axis to allow the exchange of information across the hypothalamus, pituitary, and adrenal glands. This interconnection is responsible for activating the dual hunger–satiety circuit and the dopamine reward path, producing energy and acquiring food from the environment [18]. The axis between the brain and intestines can be influenced by the host’s genetic composition, level of stress, negative emotions, and diet type [19]. The microbiota can also regulate the pathogenesis, progression, and management of diseases [20,21]. The effectiveness of these functions relies on both the quantity and quality of the microbiota, as well as its metabolic potential [22]. This shows that the characteristics of the gut microbiota can significantly vary across individuals based on their genetic profile, lifestyle, and habits [23]. In practice, the gut microbiota is recognised as a key determinant in predicting how individuals respond to particular dietary components [24]. Consequently, the direct evaluation of host–microbiota interactions constitutes an advanced therapeutic tool during disease control and prevention stages [25]. This highlights the necessity of evaluating individuals’ microbiota to structure precision diets and interventions required for optimal health [26].
In daily life, the type of consumed diet has been shown to influence the microbiome’s composition. For example, diets rich in animal-based nutrients can stimulate the release of bile-resistant species, while plant-based foods are associated with a higher level of plant polysaccharide-fermenting species [27]. A limited 24 h consumption of carbohydrates can also decrease the production of bacteria responsible for destroying food fibres [28]. In obesity and weight gain cases, the microbiota plays a crucial role in monitoring energy use and the formation of gut metabolites [29]. Therefore, individuals eating an unhealthy diet and gaining weight for a prolonged period of more than ten years have limited intestinal microbiota diversity [30]. Other findings relate the disruption in the microbiota’s composition to some inherited and non-modifiable individual characteristics, such as ethnicity and geographical setting [31].
Another factor that can also interfere with the variety and stability of gut microbiota is the consumption of sugar substitutes [32]. It was found that the administration of sucralose for 12 weeks was associated with lower levels of anaerobes, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, Bacteroides, clostridia, and total aerobic bacteria [33]. Prolonged sucralose consumption in mice caused a high release of bacterial pro-inflammatory genes and disruption in faecal metabolites [34]. In turn, the limited utilisation of emulsifiers as food additives showed a reduced microbial diversity [35]. The consumption of a fermentable oligosaccharides-, disaccharides-, monosaccharides-, and polyols (active b)-rich diet can also alter the gut microbiota [36]. This type of diet has been shown to minimise the risk of insulin resistance in healthy overweight and obese patients [37,38].
Animal and in vitro studies found that gluten-free bread intake lessens the microbiota dysbiosis usually occurring in gluten sensitivity or coeliac disease cases [39,40]. Following a four-week gluten-free diet (GFD), individuals presented with different metabolic profiles and subsequent changes in gut microbiota [41]. In healthy subjects, decreased levels of Bifidobacterium, Clostridium lituseburense, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Lactobacillus, and higher Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli counts following GFD, were reported [42]. There is some emphasis on the potential of a low-gluten diet to induce moderate changes in the intestinal microbiome, reduce fasting and postprandial hydrogen exhalation, and improve self-reported bloating in healthy individuals [43]. Despite its advantages, GFD can be associated with a higher risk of heart disease due to a possible reduction in whole grains’ consumption [44].
This may suggest the impact of dietary habits on gut microbiota and confirm the crucial role of the microbiome as a major contributing factor to PN (Figure 2). Therefore, the variation between individuals and populations can affect the overall response to diet in terms of meals’ digestion, nutritional benefits, and personalisation.

2.2. Genetics and Metabolic Profile

The genetic makeup is another important factor that may contribute to the inter-individual variation in dietary behaviours [45]. Some of the recent advances in the field of genomics assisted researchers in better understanding the role of genetic variant sites and functions in the development of chronic conditions. This also contributed to predicting the risk of chronic diseases and personalising their prevention and treatment plans [46]. Accordingly, individuals may present with genetic variations, known as polymorphisms, which can lead to differences in the metabolic processing of nutrients within the same population [47]. For example, the presence of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in intron 1 of the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP1A2 gene was linked to a variation in caffeine metabolism [48,49]. This may account for the high inter-individual variability found in caffeine intrinsic concentrations. In addition, individuals with the CC genotype of a SNP were more likely to gain weight when eating a high-saturated-fat diet (around 10% higher BMI), whereas those with the TT genotype were not associated with this complication [50,51].
The mutual mapping of the individuals’ genetic and metabolic profiles constitutes an important tool for assessing the body’s response to different nutrients and tailoring a personalised diet [52]. For example, a protein- and fibre-rich diet may benefit individuals suffering from low-insulin sensitivity, while a high monounsaturated fatty acids-based diet may benefit patients with insulin resistance [53]. Interestingly, when measuring the metabolic response to high and low glycaemic index meals, it was found that certain subjects had a variance in their glucose and insulin responses to the same standardised index meals [54]. This further strengthens the importance of taking into consideration the inter-individual alterations in metabolic profile while tailoring the diet to produce better health outcomes. In parallel, biological components, including proteins, metabolites, microbiota, and epigenetic markers, helped in understanding the possible association between the individuals’ physiological mechanisms and their susceptibility to chronic diseases [55].

2.3. Psychosocial and Socioeconomic Status

Obesity has been correlated with an increased risk of psychosocial burden [56]. In particular, obese individuals can suffer from mood, self-esteem, and body image-related issues [57]. It was suggested that depressive symptoms are associated with altered eating behaviours and increased food and beverage caloric intake [58]. This is likely due to the food’s ability to activate brain reward circuits that lead to the release of dopamine [59]. Patients with eating disorders also reported difficulties in controlling the frequency of their eating, portion sizes, or extreme eating behaviour [60]. This can be further associated with disordered eating leading to uncontrolled weight gain. In such cases, the psychosocial status of individuals should be considered as a crucial factor when tailoring a specific nutritional plan [61]. The implementation of a long-term weight loss plan should also be considered to allow a gradual improvement in an individual’s psychological distress [62].
Socioeconomic status can also be directly correlated with psychological status [63], as individuals with a high socioeconomic status (SES) seem to follow healthier food habits [64]. Individuals with a low SES are prone to a poorer health status, as they are unable to comply with the required nutritional recommendations or dietary guidelines; in turn, they are more likely to experience unhealthy conditions [59,63]. Recent evidence suggested that a higher percentage of low SES households had unhealthy eating habits, such as consumption of fast foods, while high SES households had healthier eating patterns [65]. This could be due to the lack of purchasing power in those with a low SES, which can lead to the consumption of cheaper and lower-quality ingredients, causing nutritional deficiencies [66]. This confirms the importance of SES consideration when tailoring an individualised diet to improve the nutritive quality. Moreover, both social inequity and diet quality, in conjunction with healthy dietary behaviours, constitute a crucial and active public health concern.

3. PN Use in the Management of Obesity

Obesity is a complex non-communicable disease, which is influenced by both environmental and hereditary factors, representing a relevant target for PN [67]. Recently, studies have shown significant correlations between individuals’ intrinsic components and the extrinsic factors that can directly affect their lifestyle and habits [67]. In this case, PN can help in simultaneously evaluating individuals’ genes, metabolic markers, microbial species, environmental elements (sociodemographic and physical activity), and obesity phenotypic traits (body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, and central and regional adiposity).

3.1. Genetic Basis of Obesity

The progression of obesity has been correlated with multiple genetic factors that can affect the interaction of macronutrients with the individual’s genotype [68,69]. Recently, advanced human genome sequencing and applied population genetics studies have been used as a main tool for detecting the gene variants associated with obesity and its related traits [69]. SNPs have been known as one of the main types of genetic variants that are associated with obesity [70]. For example, insulin-like growth factor, dioxygenase enzyme, melanocortin receptor, and apolipoprotein present SNPs associated with an increased risk of obesity [1,2,16,17,18,71]. In parallel, the conduction of a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) helped in detecting more than 140 obesity-related SNPs [72], while another one revealed about 300 SNPs in total [73]. Despite their discovery, the impact of these SNPs on BMI is still modestly rated, and further investigations are needed for evaluating the influence of genetics on the development of obesity [70,73]. This cannot be relevant to Prader-Willy syndrome cases or genes related to leptin and melanocortin signalling, which have a higher influence on BMI [74].
In some cases, genes are integrated with carbohydrate and lipid metabolism [75], and in others, genes are responsible for activating the proteins of carbohydrates and lipid taste receptors [76]. Some of the genes participate in encoding the lipid transporters of proteins or digestive enzymes present in starch and milk [77], and some other genes are responsible for using and storing energy, food reward, and gut regulatory processes [78,79]. For example, the intake of dietary fats and carbohydrates was found to be associated with the SNP “rs1761667” and “rs35874116” on the cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) protein and taste 1 receptor member 2 (TAS1R2) gene, respectively [18]. Moreover, “rs1799883” SNP of the fatty acid binding protein 2 (FABP2) gene was found to be associated with hypertriglyceridemia, while “rs9939609” SNP of the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene was correlated with an increased risk of body fat accumulation [18]. In parallel, the “rs1800497” SNP of the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) gene was seen to interlink with the brain–gut microbiota axis and stimulate dysbiosis, negative emotions, and obesity [18]. Despite their unsatisfactory effects, some genetic variations, such as a high AMY1 copy number, were seen to protect the body against obesity [80]. Other genetic variants, polymorphisms, and SNPs are presented in Table 1.
It is worth mentioning that epigenetic changes linked to external factors can change genetic activity and express the obese phenotype [93,94]. These epigenetic modifications were mainly documented following the practice of a dietary plan, physical activity, and surgeries [13]. Therefore, advanced gene-based technologies have been implemented to personalise dietary recommendations based on individuals’ genetic profiles [95]. Nutrigenomics studies reported how individuals’ genetic variations influence their responses to nutrients and how diet, in turn, affects gene expression [96]. Limited data supported the superiority of this technology regarding weight loss results in comparison to standardised care [97,98]. Currently, the increased application of pharmacogenomics to evaluate therapeutic responses to pharmaceutical compounds is associated with a marked clinical relevance [99]. This advanced technique allows the mapping of genetic variants that can influence the response to weight loss treatment [93]. However, pharmacogenomics application is still limited due to financial issues. In recent studies, the discovery of next-generation probiotics has been linked to several health benefits [100]. The clinical use of these probiotics is also limited due to several reasons, such as safety, efficacy, and cost [101,102,103,104]. In some cases, the transplantation of faecal matter has been initialised for the treatment of obesity and other metabolic disorders. Its clinical application remains limited due to the variation in the obtained findings [105].

3.2. Weight Management

The consumption of specific types of food can help prevent the development of obesity [106]. According to epidemiological research, consuming dairy products and vegetarian protein sources can protect against obesity, unlike consuming large amounts of meat, which is correlated with a greater risk of weight gain [107,108,109]. This was supported by a Chinese study, which viewed that consuming large quantities of fatty food can increase the chance of weight gain and obesity [110]. Therefore, poor diet quality was strongly correlated with a greater risk of weight gain despite gender differences [111]. The increased caloric density of high-fat foods also promotes low-satiety effects, especially when consumed in large quantities [112]. This can emphasise the need for a more passive focus on selecting the appropriate intervention for dietary self-monitoring adherence [113].
In practice, the majority of obese women valued the use of weight management services and advice, despite the limited practical discussions and application of these approaches [114]. The use of individualised information while providing nutritional advice helped in sustaining changes in healthy dietary behaviours [115]. A UK-based study showed that applying PN advice through mobile applications was beneficial in improving diet quality and individuals’ engagement in dietary habits, in comparison to the general population [116]. These findings highlighted the potential of PN to improve individuals’ adherence to dietary habits as well as improve weight and glucose management for a long period [117,118,119]. In the long term, the benefits of PN use were associated with a decrease in total fat intake, in addition to compliance with nutritional advice [120].
In daily life, limited physical activity due to a sedentary lifestyle, high screen time, processed meats, physical education, and transportation constitute a direct risk factor for obesity [121]. For example, individuals exercising minimal physical effort have a greater chance of alleviating the risk of type 2 diabetes by 26% compared to unenergetic ones [122]. When applied to physical activity, PN is still inconsistently modifying behavioural changes, such as the ones documented in dietary patterns and diet quality [123,124,125]. The value of personalising dietary advice for modifying physical activity levels was not found to be superior to the conventional guidelines when the physical activity was objectively assessed [126,127]. In some cases, PN was seen to significantly enhance individuals’ exercise frequency when they were informed about their genetic testing results [128].
In summary, the obtained findings can illustrate crucial inputs about PN application in practice and its impact on changing individuals’ diet quality and physical activity, highlighting the need for further research.

3.3. Intestinal Bacterial Flora

The different responses to nutritional recommendations can be regulated by the composition of the gut microbiome for each individual [129,130]. It has been evidenced that the intestinal microbiota is intrinsically affected by the overall health, including obesity risk [131]. Physiologically, the gut microbiota utilises energy from the diet and interacts with the host genes that regulate the expansion and storage of energy [132]. Therefore, live bacteria (probiotics), nondigestible or limited digestible food constituents, such as oligosaccharides (prebiotics), or both (synbiotics), or even faecal transplants have been used as an emerging tool to restore the intestinal microbiota and treat or prevent obesity [133,134,135,136]. This may suggest the key role of the gut microbiota while applying the PN criteria to facilitate weight loss in obese individuals [137]. A human study reported that obese individuals had more Firmicutes and nearly 90% fewer Bacteroidetes than lean individuals [138]. It was observed that a healthy weight and good metabolic health were seen in patients with bacteria of the genus Oscillospira, while Collinsella aerofaciens bacteria were more frequently documented in obese individuals [139]. Other anatomical and physiological changes can also occur in the gut microbiota following the performance of bariatric surgery. Despite its documented benefits regarding weight loss and glycaemic control, a recent study verified the alterations in microbial diversity and composition three months following bariatric surgery [140]. More specifically, a high level of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes and a low Firmicutes concentration were reported [141]. In the long term, microbiota species were still maintained, indicating that bariatric surgery could achieve a fast and prolonged modification in the patient’s gut microbiota [141]. The transplantation of faecal microbiota has been reported to reduce body fat accumulation two weeks post-procedure in germ-free mice who had their Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG; 46% and 26%, respectively) [140]. Thus, the inter-individual changes in gut microbiota should always be considered when structuring a nutritional plan, since it can directly influence metabolism, resulting in either weight loss or gain [142]. This was supported by a study validating that individuals’ gut microbiota can be used to design personalised diets for glucose homeostasis [143].

4. Obesity-Related Complications

The complex nature of obesity is not only related to its pathophysiological features and symptoms’ severity but also to its associated chronic complications, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer [144,145,146]. This emphasises the value of PN in alleviating the severity of obesity and the risk of other chronic diseases that may be associated with a poor prognosis and low quality of life [147,148].

4.1. Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a fast-spreading metabolic condition and is rated as the 7th leading cause of death in the United States [149]. Obesity was found to be strongly associated with the progression of T2D, with a seven times greater risk of developing T2D in obese patients than normal weight individuals [150,151]. The maintenance of a balanced metabolic homeostasis is required to effectively manage the condition [152]. This can be achieved by applying PN to ensure an appropriate nutritional consumption of protein, fat, carbohydrates, vitamins, and mineral substances [153,154]. In parallel, specific analytical determinants have been analysed in plasma and urine samples to objectively quantify an individual’s nutritional status [155]. These biomarkers, obtained from biological samples, can provide a more realistic evaluation of nutritional status than dietary intake [156]. Figure 3 provides some examples of evidence-based nutritional biomarkers in plasma and urine samples.
The low adherence to the Mediterranean diet can cause a higher risk of T2D progression [157]. In diabetic patients, diets low in sugar-sweetened drinks and processed meats, and high in fruits and vegetables, whole grains, and nuts, can improve the glycaemic index and lipid abnormalities [158]. This type of diet can also reduce the risk of acquired diabetes in people susceptible to disease development [158]. Thus, the consumption of specific nutrients and avoidance of others is a key factor in promoting insulin sensitivity for the prevention and treatment of T2D [159]. In pregnant women, the TCF7L2 gene and its related TCF7L2 rs790314 C>T polymorphism are correlated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [160]. The TCF7L2 gene rs790314 TT genotype has a higher susceptibility to diabetes, which may be alleviated if a Mediterranean diet is followed to reduce the genetic risk [160]. The intestinal microbial flora also differs, with lower Firmicutes seen in diabetic patients when compared to the non-diabetic healthy controls [161,162]. However, further confirmation by causal, quantitative, and/or appropriate mechanistic analysis is worth pursuing to confirm this correlation and association phenomena. More specifically, Prevotellacopri (P. Copri) and Bacteroidesvulgatus species were seen to stimulate insulin resistance by activating the branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) biosynthesis [163]. Intrinsically, BCAAs signal the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) complex, leading to phosphorylation of p70S6 serine kinase (S6K1), which inactivates the insulin receptor substrate responsible for promoting insulin resistance [164]. The ingestion of barley kernel bread was seen to improve the postprandial glucose and insulin resistance in patients with T2DM due to the higher Prevotella/Bacteroides ratio [165]. This result supports the characterisation of gut microbiota for each patient with obesity and T2DM to better predict the host and microbiota response to dietary interventions [166].
The application of PN along with its intrinsic and extrinsic components can help in improving the well-being of obese patients and avoiding the occurrence of other serious complications, such as diabetes.

4.2. Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a general term including a class of disorders that involve the heart or blood vessels [167]. CVD often results from a combination of factors, including genetics, lifestyle habits, and environmental factors, which can lead to complications such as heart attacks and strokes [168]. In recent years, heart disease has been characterised as the leading factor behind the elevated cases of morbidity and mortality [169].
Heart failure is a clinical syndrome affecting over 60 million people and is associated with the inability of the heart to pump or fill blood [170]. PN can be applied for the prevention of heart failure and even in treatment stages to improve patients’ prognosis and quality of life [171]. A recent nutritional study focusing on the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet discussed the importance of prioritising fruits and vegetables, whole grains, fish, low-fat dairy, poultry, and lean meat intake [171]. The consumption of seeds, legumes, and nuts while limiting the overuse of oils and fats is also recommended. In turn, it was found that participants positioned in the top quartile of the DASH diet score had a 37% lower risk of heart failure [172]. The adherence to a Mediterranean diet showed a protective effect against myocardial infarction and a strengthened triglycerides-lowering effect [157,173]. This may be due to the high amount of fibres enriched in this type of diet contributing to the alleviation of the risk of heart disease through high anti-inflammatory potential [174,175]. Further reports showed that dietary fibre intake can help in alleviating the risk of cardiovascular diseases, mainly atherosclerosis [169]. For example, peripheral artery disease (PAD), which is strongly interlinked with inflammation, has been evaluated based on the dietary inflammatory index (DII) [176]. Consequently, a higher DII score has been associated with poor health and increased risks of obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, metabolic syndrome, T2D, and kidney stones [177,178,179,180,181,182,183]. This confirms the value of a diet rich in fibre, folate, and vitamins A, B6, C, and E in alleviating the prevalence of PAD [184]. It was also reported that a daily intake of moderate amounts of olive oil can have a protective effect on atherosclerosis due to its micro-constituents’ anti-atherogenic potential [185]. These findings highlight the crucial role of nutritional recommendations to help individuals prioritise the consumption of beneficial foods and, in turn, reduce the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases.

4.3. Cancer

Cancer is a disease characterised by the malignant proliferation of cells that have managed to elude endogenous regulatory systems [186]. In 2016, The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reported that weight control is an important factor in alleviating cancer risk [187]. Evidence obtained from epidemiologic trials, mechanistic studies, and animal models also supported the association between obesity and different types of cancer in terms of risk and mortality [188]. Physiologically, the release of adipokines normally documented in obese patients was associated with the progression of obesity-related cancers; however, this causal association is still subject to preliminary analysis [189]. This finding was not supported in pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. Moreover, leptin, soluble leptin receptor (sOB-R), and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) were also similarly unrelated to the risk of obesity-related cancers [190].
In daily life, there is a large variety of bioactive phytochemicals found in food that can regulate tumour development, metastasis, and progression [191]. For example, green tea flavonoid epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG) has been demonstrated to reduce tumour growth by increasing apoptosis and decreasing the proliferation of tumour cells [191]. This substance makes human colon cancer cells more susceptible to 5-fluorouracil, improves prognosis, amplifies the effect of adjuvant therapy, and lowers the probability of tumour relapse [192]. Fruits and vegetables were also found to have a protective effect against cancer since insufficient ingestion of these nutrients can increase cancer risk [193]. Indeed, a systematic review of 110 high-quality studies found that fruit and vegetable consumption had a protective effect against lung, breast, and colorectal cancer [194]. Lastly, meta-analyses of case-control and cohort studies showed that whole-grain consumption causes a decreased risk of both site-specific and total cancer [195]. In summary, the consumption of specific nutrients reduces the risk of cancer through numerous mechanisms, such as the downregulation of tumour proliferation or the promotion of cell death in cancerous cells [196].

5. Conclusions

PN stands out as a crucial tool for enhancing the management of various obesity-related risk factors, including dietary patterns, physical activity, body weight, and metabolic markers. Supported by omics technology, PN delves into individual genetic, biomarker, and gut microbiota variations, revealing personalised responses to dietary inputs. PN’s promise extends beyond weight management, positioning it as a key asset for regularly evaluating overall patient health, especially in the presence of concurrent illnesses. In current practice, the lack of personalised dietary data may still restrict the robust application of PN. The high technological cost along with the deficient number of professionals able to analyse and evaluate this customised information can impose additional challenges when applying PN. Additionally, the association of obesity and its related complications, such as T2D with multiple polymorphic genetic variations, can make dietary interventions even more complex. Consequently, the appropriate application of PN will help in customising dietary plans to ensure patients’ adherence to the treatment and prevention of additional adverse conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.I. and B.A.-O.; methodology, J.F. and B.A.-O.; validation, S.M., S.M.I.A., A.F.S., S.I., J.F. and B.A.-O.; data curation, J.F. and B.A.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M., S.M.I.A., A.F.S. and J.F.; writing—review and editing, S.I., J.F. and B.A.-O.; supervision, S.I., J.F. and B.A.-O.; project administration, J.F. and B.A.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Khoo, C.S.; Knorr, D. Grand Challenges in Nutrition and Food Science Technology. Front. Nutr. 2014, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Head, R.J.; Buckley, J.D. Human Variation in Response to Food and Nutrients. Nutr. Rev. 2020, 78, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stover, P.J.; King, J.C. More Nutrition Precision, Better Decisions for the Health of Our Nation. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 3058–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, L.; Zhernakova, D.V.; Kurilshikov, A.; Andreu-Sánchez, S.; Wang, D.; Augustijn, H.E.; Vich Vila, A.; Weersma, R.K.; Medema, M.H.; Netea, M.G.; et al. Influence of the Microbiome, Diet and Genetics on Inter-Individual Variation in the Human Plasma Metabolome. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2333–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hughes, R.L.; Kable, M.E.; Marco, M.; Keim, N.L. The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Predicting Response to Diet and the Development of Precision Nutrition Models. Part II: Results. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 979–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simopoulos, A.P.; Serhan, C.N.; Bazinet, R.P. The Need for Precision Nutrition, Genetic Variation and Resolution in COVID-19 Patients. Mol. Aspects Med. 2021, 77, 100943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antwi, J. Precision Nutrition to Improve Risk Factors of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2023, 12, 679–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ordovas, J.M.; Corella, D. Nutritional Genomics. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2004, 5, 71–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ordovas, J.M. Genotype-Phenotype Associations: Modulation by Diet and Obesity. Obesity 2008, 16, S40–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Celis-Morales, C.; Marsaux, C.F.; Livingstone, K.M.; Navas-Carretero, S.; San-Cristobal, R.; Fallaize, R.; Macready, A.L.; O’Donovan, C.; Woolhead, C.; Forster, H.; et al. Can Genetic-Based Advice Help You Lose Weight? Findings from the Food4Me European Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 1204–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. O’Donovan, C.B.; Walsh, M.C.; Gibney, M.J.; Brennan, L.; Gibney, E.R. Knowing Your Genes: Does This Impact Behaviour Change? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gibney, E.R. Personalised Nutrition—Phenotypic and Genetic Variation in Response to Dietary Intervention. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2020, 79, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kirwan, L.; Walsh, M.C.; Celis-Morales, C.; Marsaux, C.F.M.; Livingstone, K.M.; Navas-Carretero, S.; Fallaize, R.; O’Donovan, C.B.; Woolhead, C.; Forster, H.; et al. Phenotypic Factors Influencing the Variation in Response of Circulating Cholesterol Level to Personalised Dietary Advice in the Food4Me Study. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 116, 2011–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shyam, S.; Lee, K.X.; Tan, A.S.W.; Khoo, T.A.; Harikrishnan, S.; Lalani, S.A.; Ramadas, A. Effect of Personalized Nutrition on Dietary, Physical Activity, and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rankin, A.; Bunting, B.P.; Poínhos, R.; van der Lans, I.A.; Fischer, A.R.; Kuznesof, S.; Almeida, M.; Markovina, J.; Frewer, L.J.; Stewart-Knox, B.J. Food Choice Motives, Attitude towards and Intention to Adopt Personalised Nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 2606–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut Microbiota Functions: Metabolism of Nutrients and Other Food Components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jandhyala, S.M.; Talukdar, R.; Subramanyam, C.; Vuyyuru, H.; Sasikala, M.; Reddy, D.N. Role of the Normal Gut Microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 8787–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Panduro, A.; Roman, S.; Garcia Milan, R.; Torres-Reyes, L.; Aldaco, K. Chapter 10. Personalized Nutrition to Treat and Prevent Obesity and Diabetes. In Nutritional Signaling Pathway Activities in Obesity and Diabetes; ResearchGate GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 272–294. ISBN 978-1-78801-557-8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Panduro, A.; Rivera-Iñiguez, I.; Sepulveda-Villegas, M.; Roman, S. Genes, Emotions and Gut Microbiota: The next Frontier for the Gastroenterologist. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 3030–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Le Chatelier, E.; Nielsen, T.; Qin, J.; Prifti, E.; Hildebrand, F.; Falony, G.; Almeida, M.; Arumugam, M.; Batto, J.-M.; Kennedy, S.; et al. Richness of Human Gut Microbiome Correlates with Metabolic Markers. Nature 2013, 500, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cho, I.; Blaser, M.J. The Human Microbiome: At the Interface of Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hughes, R.L.; Holscher, H.D. Fueling Gut Microbes: A Review of the Interaction between Diet, Exercise, and the Gut Microbiota in Athletes. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 2190–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mills, S.; Stanton, C.; Lane, J.A.; Smith, G.J.; Ross, R.P. Precision Nutrition and the Microbiome, Part I: Current State of the Science. Nutrients 2019, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bashiardes, S.; Godneva, A.; Elinav, E.; Segal, E. Towards Utilization of the Human Genome and Microbiome for Personalized Nutrition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 51, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kolodziejczyk, A.A.; Zheng, D.; Elinav, E. Diet-Microbiota Interactions and Personalized Nutrition. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Klimenko, N.S.; Odintsova, V.E.; Revel-Muroz, A.; Tyakht, A.V. The Hallmarks of Dietary Intervention-Resilient Gut Microbiome. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2022, 8, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rothschild, D.; Weissbrod, O.; Barkan, E.; Kurilshikov, A.; Korem, T.; Zeevi, D.; Costea, P.I.; Godneva, A.; Kalka, I.N.; Bar, N.; et al. Environment Dominates over Host Genetics in Shaping Human Gut Microbiota. Nature 2018, 555, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mardinoglu, A.; Wu, H.; Bjornson, E.; Zhang, C.; Hakkarainen, A.; Räsänen, S.M.; Lee, S.; Mancina, R.M.; Bergentall, M.; Pietiläinen, K.H.; et al. An Integrated Understanding of the Rapid Metabolic Benefits of a Carbohydrate-Restricted Diet on Hepatic Steatosis in Humans. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 559–571.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lazar, V.; Ditu, L.-M.; Pircalabioru, G.G.; Picu, A.; Petcu, L.; Cucu, N.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Gut Microbiota, Host Organism, and Diet Trialogue in Diabetes and Obesity. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Menni, C.; Jackson, M.A.; Pallister, T.; Steves, C.J.; Spector, T.D.; Valdes, A.M. Gut Microbiome Diversity and High-Fibre Intake Are Related to Lower Long-Term Weight Gain. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Deschasaux, M.; Bouter, K.E.; Prodan, A.; Levin, E.; Groen, A.K.; Herrema, H.; Tremaroli, V.; Bakker, G.J.; Attaye, I.; Pinto-Sietsma, S.-J.; et al. Depicting the Composition of Gut Microbiota in a Population with Varied Ethnic Origins but Shared Geography. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1526–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nettleton, J.E.; Reimer, R.A.; Shearer, J. Reshaping the Gut Microbiota: Impact of Low Calorie Sweeteners and the Link to Insulin Resistance? Physiol. Behav. 2016, 164, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Abou-Donia, M.B.; El-Masry, E.M.; Abdel-Rahman, A.A.; McLendon, R.E.; Schiffman, S.S. Splenda Alters Gut Microflora and Increases Intestinal P-Glycoprotein and Cytochrome p-450 in Male Rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2008, 71, 1415–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bian, X.; Chi, L.; Gao, B.; Tu, P.; Ru, H.; Lu, K. Gut Microbiome Response to Sucralose and Its Potential Role in Inducing Liver Inflammation in Mice. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chassaing, B.; Koren, O.; Goodrich, J.K.; Poole, A.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Ley, R.E.; Gewirtz, A.T. Dietary Emulsifiers Impact the Mouse Gut Microbiota Promoting Colitis and Metabolic Syndrome. Nature 2015, 519, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hemami, R.M.; Shakarami, A.; Ardekani, A.M.; Aghaii, S.; Makarem, D.; Nikrad, N.; Farhangi, M.A.; Pour Abbasi, M.S. Investigation of the Association between Habitual Dietary FODMAP Intake, Metabolic Parameters, Glycemic Status, and Anthropometric Features among Apparently Healthy Overweight and Obese Individuals. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2023, 23, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Halmos, E.P. When the Low FODMAP Diet Does Not Work. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 32 (Suppl. S1), 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gibson, P.R. The Evidence Base for Efficacy of the Low FODMAP Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Is It Ready for Prime Time as a First-Line Therapy? J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 32 (Suppl. S1), 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mohan, M.; Chow, C.-E.T.; Ryan, C.N.; Chan, L.S.; Dufour, J.; Aye, P.P.; Blanchard, J.; Moehs, C.P.; Sestak, K. Dietary Gluten-Induced Gut Dysbiosis Is Accompanied by Selective Upregulation of microRNAs with Intestinal Tight Junction and Bacteria-Binding Motifs in Rhesus Macaque Model of Celiac Disease. Nutrients 2016, 8, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bevilacqua, A.; Costabile, A.; Bergillos-Meca, T.; Gonzalez, I.; Landriscina, L.; Ciuffreda, E.; D’Agnello, P.; Corbo, M.R.; Sinigaglia, M.; Lamacchia, C. Impact of Gluten-Friendly Bread on the Metabolism and Function of In Vitro Gut Microbiota in Healthy Human and Coeliac Subjects. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bonder, M.J.; Tigchelaar, E.F.; Cai, X.; Trynka, G.; Cenit, M.C.; Hrdlickova, B.; Zhong, H.; Vatanen, T.; Gevers, D.; Wijmenga, C.; et al. The Influence of a Short-Term Gluten-Free Diet on the Human Gut Microbiome. Genome Med. 2016, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De Palma, G.; Nadal, I.; Collado, M.C.; Sanz, Y. Effects of a Gluten-Free Diet on Gut Microbiota and Immune Function in Healthy Adult Human Subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 1154–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hansen, L.B.S.; Roager, H.M.; Søndertoft, N.B.; Gøbel, R.J.; Kristensen, M.; Vallès-Colomer, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Ibrügger, S.; Lind, M.V.; Mærkedahl, R.B.; et al. A Low-Gluten Diet Induces Changes in the Intestinal Microbiome of Healthy Danish Adults. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lebwohl, B.; Cao, Y.; Zong, G.; Hu, F.B.; Green, P.H.R.; Neugut, A.I.; Rimm, E.B.; Sampson, L.; Dougherty, L.W.; Giovannucci, E.; et al. Long Term Gluten Consumption in Adults without Celiac Disease and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: Prospective Cohort Study. BMJ 2017, 357, j1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grimm, E.R.; Steinle, N.I. Genetics of Eating Behavior: Established and Emerging Concepts. Nutr. Rev. 2011, 69, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ramos-Lopez, O.; Milagro, F.I.; Allayee, H.; Chmurzynska, A.; Choi, M.S.; Curi, R.; De Caterina, R.; Ferguson, L.R.; Goni, L.; Kang, J.X.; et al. Guide for Current Nutrigenetic, Nutrigenomic, and Nutriepigenetic Approaches for Precision Nutrition Involving the Prevention and Management of Chronic Diseases Associated with Obesity. Lifestyle Genom. 2017, 10, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Paoloni-Giacobino, A.; Grimble, R.; Pichard, C. Genetics and Nutrition. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 22, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fulton, J.L.; Dinas, P.C.; Carrillo, A.E.; Edsall, J.R.; Ryan, E.J.; Ryan, E.J. Impact of Genetic Variability on Physiological Responses to Caffeine in Humans: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sachse, C.; Brockmöller, J.; Bauer, S.; Roots, I. Functional Significance of a C→A Polymorphism in Intron 1 of the Cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 Gene Tested with Caffeine. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1999, 47, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Corella, D.; Peloso, G.; Arnett, D.K.; Demissie, S.; Cupples, L.A.; Tucker, K.; Lai, C.-Q.; Parnell, L.D.; Coltell, O.; Lee, Y.-C.; et al. APOA2, Dietary Fat, and Body Mass Index: Replication of a Gene-Diet Interaction in 3 Independent Populations. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 1897–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zeisel, S.H. A Conceptual Framework for Studying and Investing in Precision Nutrition. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. LeMieux, M.; Al-Jawadi, A.; Wang, S.; Moustaid-Moussa, N. Metabolic Profiling in Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 548–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Trouwborst, I.; Gijbels, A.; Jardon, K.M.; Siebelink, E.; Hul, G.B.; Wanders, L.; Erdos, B.; Péter, S.; Singh-Povel, C.M.; de Vogel-van den Bosch, J.; et al. Cardiometabolic Health Improvements upon Dietary Intervention Are Driven by Tissue-Specific Insulin Resistance Phenotype: A Precision Nutrition Trial. Cell Metab. 2023, 35, 71–83.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Krishnan, S.; Newman, J.W.; Hembrooke, T.A.; Keim, N.L. Variation in Metabolic Responses to Meal Challenges Differing in Glycemic Index in Healthy Women: Is It Meaningful? Nutr. Metab. 2012, 9, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ferguson, L.R.; De Caterina, R.; Görman, U.; Allayee, H.; Kohlmeier, M.; Prasad, C.; Choi, M.S.; Curi, R.; De Luis, D.A.; Gil, Á.; et al. Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalised Nutrition: Part 1—Fields of Precision Nutrition. J. Nutr. Nutr. 2016, 9, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sarwer, D.B.; Polonsky, H.M. The Psychosocial Burden of Obesity. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 45, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rizzo, A.; Sitibondo, A. Obesity and Life History: The Hypothesis of Psychological Phenotypes. Psych 2023, 5, 866–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grossniklaus, D.A.; Dunbar, S.B.; Tohill, B.C.; Gary, R.; Higgins, M.K.; Frediani, J. Psychological Factors Are Important Correlates of Dietary Pattern in Overweight Adults. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2010, 25, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Butler, M.J.; Eckel, L.A. Eating as a Motivated Behavior: Modulatory Effect of High Fat Diets on Energy Homeostasis, Reward Processing, and Neuroinflammation. Integr. Zool. 2018, 13, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Vahia, V.N. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5: A Quick Glance. Indian J. Psychiatry 2013, 55, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Srp, F.; Steiger, E.; Gulledge, A.D.; Matarese, L.E.; Paysinger, J.; Roncagli, T.; Stebbins, J.; Sullivan, M. Psychosocial Issues of Nutritional Support. A Multidisciplinary Interpretation. Nurs. Clin. N. Am. 1989, 24, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Steptoe, A.; Frank, P. Obesity and Psychological Distress. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2023, 378, 20220225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Reiss, F.; Meyrose, A.-K.; Otto, C.; Lampert, T.; Klasen, F.; Ravens-Sieberer, U. Socioeconomic Status, Stressful Life Situations and Mental Health Problems in Children and Adolescents: Results of the German BELLA Cohort-Study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. James, W.P.; Nelson, M.; Ralph, A.; Leather, S. Socioeconomic Determinants of Health. The Contribution of Nutrition to Inequalities in Health. BMJ Br. Med. J. 1997, 314, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Foroozanfar, Z.; Moghadami, M.; Mohsenpour, M.A.; Houshiarrad, A.; Farmani, A.; Akbarpoor, M.A.; Shenavar, R. Socioeconomic Determinants of Nutritional Behaviors of Households in Fars Province, Iran, 2018. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 956293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. French, S.A.; Tangney, C.C.; Crane, M.M.; Wang, Y.; Appelhans, B.M. Nutrition Quality of Food Purchases Varies by Household Income: The SHoPPER Study. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Voruganti, V.S. Precision Nutrition: Recent Advances in Obesity. Physiology 2023, 38, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. San-Cristobal, R.; Navas-Carretero, S.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Ordovas, J.M.; Martínez, J.A. Contribution of Macronutrients to Obesity: Implications for Precision Nutrition. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Goni, L.; Cuervo, M.; Milagro, F.I.; Martínez, J.A. Future Perspectives of Personalized Weight Loss Interventions Based on Nutrigenetic, Epigenetic, and Metagenomic Data. J. Nutr. 2015, 146, 905S–912S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wassel, C.L.; Pankow, J.S.; Rasmussen-Torvik, L.J.; Li, N.; Taylor, K.D.; Guo, X.; Goodarzi, M.O.; Palmas, W.R.; Post, W.S. Associations of SNPs in ADIPOQ and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Obesity 2011, 19, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cuevas-Sierra, A.; Ramos-Lopez, O.; Riezu-Boj, J.I.; Milagro, F.I.; Martinez, J.A. Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Obesity: Links with Host Genetics and Epigenetics and Potential Applications. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S17–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fall, T.; Mendelson, M.; Speliotes, E.K. Recent Advances in Human Genetics and Epigenetics of Adiposity: Pathway to Precision Medicine? Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1695–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using I-TASSER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2015, 52, 5.8.1–5.8.15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Locke, A.E.; Kahali, B.; Berndt, S.I.; Justice, A.E.; Pers, T.H.; Day, F.R.; Powell, C.; Vedantam, S.; Buchkovich, M.L.; Yang, J.; et al. Genetic Studies of Body Mass Index Yield New Insights for Obesity Biology. Nature 2015, 518, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Haro, D.; Marrero, P.F.; Relat, J. Nutritional Regulation of Gene Expression: Carbohydrate-, Fat- and Amino Acid-Dependent Modulation of Transcriptional Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bravo-Ruiz, I.; Medina, M.Á.; Martínez-Poveda, B. From Food to Genes: Transcriptional Regulation of Metabolism by Lipids and Carbohydrates. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, C.; Liu, J.; Wu, X.; Bao, P.; Long, R.; Guo, X.; Ding, X.; Yan, P. The Response of Gene Expression Associated with Lipid Metabolism, Fat Deposition and Fatty Acid Profile in the Longissimus Dorsi Muscle of Gannan Yaks to Different Energy Levels of Diets. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lenard, N.R.; Berthoud, H.-R. Central and Peripheral Regulation of Food Intake and Physical Activity: Pathways and Genes. Obesity 2008, 16, S11–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. de Wouters d’Oplinter, A.; Huwart, S.J.P.; Cani, P.D.; Everard, A. Gut Microbes and Food Reward: From the Gut to the Brain. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 947240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Venkatapoorna, C.M.K.; Ayine, P.; Parra, E.P.; Koenigs, T.; Phillips, M.; Babu, J.R.; Sandey, M.; Geetha, T. Association of Salivary Amylase (AMY1) Gene Copy Number with Obesity in Alabama Elementary School Children. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Erez, G.; Tirosh, A.; Rudich, A.; Meiner, V.; Schwarzfuchs, D.; Sharon, N.; Shpitzen, S.; Blüher, M.; Stumvoll, M.; Thiery, J.; et al. Phenotypic and Genetic Variation in Leptin as Determinants of Weight Regain. Int. J. Obes. 2011, 35, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, X.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, C.; Hu, F.B.; Sacks, F.M.; Qi, L. FTO Genotype and 2-Year Change in Body Composition and Fat Distribution in Response to Weight-Loss Diets. Diabetes 2012, 61, 3005–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. McCaffery, J.; Papandonatos, G.D.; Huggins, G.S.; Peter, I.; Kahn, S.E.; Knowler, W.C.; Hudnall, G.E.; Lipkin, E.; Kitabchi, A.E.; Wagenknecht, L.E.; et al. FTO Predicts Weight Regain in the Look AHEAD Clinical Trial. Int. J. Obes. 2013, 37, 1545–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pan, Q.; Delahanty, L.M.; Jablonski, K.A.; Knowler, W.C.; Kahn, S.E.; Florez, J.C.; Franks, P.W.; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Variation at the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Gene and Response to Weight-Loss Interventions in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Obesity 2013, 21, E520–E526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Qi, Q.; Bray, G.A.; Smith, S.R.; Hu, F.B.; Sacks, F.M.; Qi, L. Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 (IRS1) Gene Variation Modifies Insulin Resistance Response to Weight-Loss Diets in a Two-Year Randomized Trial. Circulation 2011, 124, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mattei, J.; Qi, Q.; Hu, F.B.; Sacks, F.M.; Qi, L. TCF7L2 Genetic Variants Modulate the Effect of Dietary Fat Intake on Changes in Body Composition during a Weight-Loss Intervention123. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Heni, M.; Herzberg-Schäfer, S.; Machicao, F.; Häring, H.-U.; Fritsche, A. Dietary Fiber Intake Modulates the Association between Variants in TCF7L2 and Weight Loss during a Lifestyle Intervention. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Qi, Q.; Bray, G.A.; Hu, F.B.; Sacks, F.M.; Qi, L. Weight-Loss Diets Modify Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Receptor Rs2287019 Genotype Effects on Changes in Body Weight, Fasting Glucose, and Insulin Resistance: The Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies Trial123. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 95, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Heianza, Y.; Qi, L. Gene-Diet Interaction and Precision Nutrition in Obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qi, Q.; Xu, M.; Wu, H.; Liang, L.; Champagne, C.M.; Bray, G.A.; Sacks, F.M.; Qi, L. IRS1 Genotype Modulates Metabolic Syndrome Reversion in Response to 2-Year Weight-Loss Diet Intervention. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 3442–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kostis, W.J.; Cabrera, J.; Hooper, W.C.; Whelton, P.K.; Espeland, M.A.; Cosgrove, N.M.; Cheng, J.Q.; Deng, Y.; De Staerck, C.; Pyle, M.; et al. Relationships Between Selected Gene Polymorphisms and Blood Pressure Sensitivity to Weight Loss in Elderly Persons With Hypertension. Hypertension 2013, 61, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, X.; Qi, Q.; Liang, J.; Hu, F.B.; Sacks, F.M.; Qi, L. Neuropeptide Y Promoter Polymorphism Modifies Effects of a Weight-Loss Diet on 2-Year Changes of Blood Pressure: The Pounds Lost Trial. Hypertension 2012, 60, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Acosta, A.; Camilleri, M.; Abu Dayyeh, B.; Calderon, G.; Gonzalez, D.; McRae, A.; Rossini, W.; Singh, S.; Burton, D.; Clark, M.M. Selection of Antiobesity Medications Based on Phenotypes Enhances Weight Loss: A Pragmatic Trial in an Obesity Clinic. Obesity 2021, 29, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cordero, P.; Li, J.; Oben, J.A. Epigenetics of Obesity: Beyond the Genome Sequence. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2015, 18, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rudkowska, I. Genomics and Personalized Nutrition. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jenzer, H.; Sadeghi-Reeves, L. Nutrigenomics-Associated Impacts of Nutrients on Genes and Enzymes With Special Consideration of Aromatase. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Arkadianos, I.; Valdes, A.M.; Marinos, E.; Florou, A.; Gill, R.D.; Grimaldi, K.A. Improved Weight Management Using Genetic Information to Personalize a Calorie Controlled Diet. Nutr. J. 2007, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Gardner, C.D.; Trepanowski, J.F.; Del Gobbo, L.C.; Hauser, M.E.; Rigdon, J.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Desai, M.; King, A.C. Effect of Low-Fat vs Low-Carbohydrate Diet on 12-Month Weight Loss in Overweight Adults and the Association With Genotype Pattern or Insulin Secretion: The DIETFITS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018, 319, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Roden, D.M.; McLeod, H.L.; Relling, M.V.; Williams, M.S.; Mensah, G.A.; Peterson, J.F.; Van Driest, S.L. Pharmacogenomics. Lancet 2019, 394, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. O’Toole, P.W.; Marchesi, J.R.; Hill, C. Next-Generation Probiotics: The Spectrum from Probiotics to Live Biotherapeutics. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Brusaferro, A.; Cozzali, R.; Orabona, C.; Biscarini, A.; Farinelli, E.; Cavalli, E.; Grohmann, U.; Principi, N.; Esposito, S. Is It Time to Use Probiotics to Prevent or Treat Obesity? Nutrients 2018, 10, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cunningham, M.; Azcarate-Peril, M.A.; Barnard, A.; Benoit, V.; Grimaldi, R.; Guyonnet, D.; Holscher, H.D.; Hunter, K.; Manurung, S.; Obis, D.; et al. Shaping the Future of Probiotics and Prebiotics. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 667–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nicolucci, A.C.; Hume, M.P.; Martínez, I.; Mayengbam, S.; Walter, J.; Reimer, R.A. Prebiotics Reduce Body Fat and Alter Intestinal Microbiota in Children Who Are Overweight or With Obesity. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Kesika, P.; Suganthy, N.; Chaiyasut, C. A Review on Role of Microbiome in Obesity and Antiobesity Properties of Probiotic Supplements. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, e3291367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hartstra, A.V.; Bouter, K.E.C.; Bäckhed, F.; Nieuwdorp, M. Insights into the Role of the Microbiome in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dominguez, L.J.; Veronese, N.; Di Bella, G.; Cusumano, C.; Parisi, A.; Tagliaferri, F.; Ciriminna, S.; Barbagallo, M. Mediterranean Diet in the Management and Prevention of Obesity. Exp. Gerontol. 2023, 174, 112121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Fogelholm, M.; Anderssen, S.; Gunnarsdottir, I.; Lahti-Koski, M. Dietary Macronutrients and Food Consumption as Determinants of Long-Term Weight Change in Adult Populations: A Systematic Literature Review. Food Nutr. Res. 2012, 56, 19103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Smith, J.D.; Hou, T.; Ludwig, D.S.; Rimm, E.B.; Willett, W.; Hu, F.B.; Mozaffarian, D. Changes in Intake of Protein Foods, Carbohydrate Amount and Quality, and Long-Term Weight Change: Results from 3 Prospective Cohorts1234. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Mozaffarian, D. Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity—A Comprehensive Review. Circulation 2016, 133, 187–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Popkin, B.M.; Du, S. Elevated Fat Intake Increases Body Weight and the Risk of Overweight and Obesity among Chinese Adults: 1991–2015 Trends. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Collins, C.E.; Young, A.F.; Hodge, A. Diet Quality Is Associated with Higher Nutrient Intake and Self-Rated Health in Mid-Aged Women. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2008, 27, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Rolls, E.T. Taste, Olfactory and Food Texture Reward Processing in the Brain and the Control of Appetite. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2012, 71, 488–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Popp, C.J.; Hu, L.; Kharmats, A.Y.; Curran, M.; Berube, L.; Wang, C.; Pompeii, M.L.; Illiano, P.; St-Jules, D.E.; Mottern, M.; et al. Effect of a Personalized Diet to Reduce Postprandial Glycemic Response vs a Low-Fat Diet on Weight Loss in Adults With Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Obesity. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2233760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Macleod, M.; Gregor, A.; Barnett, C.; Magee, E.; Thompson, J.; Anderson, A.S. Provision of Weight Management Advice for Obese Women during Pregnancy: A Survey of Current Practice and Midwives’ Views on Future Approaches. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2012, 9, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Celis-Morales, C.; Livingstone, K.M.; Marsaux, C.F.; Macready, A.L.; Fallaize, R.; O’Donovan, C.B.; Woolhead, C.; Forster, H.; Walsh, M.C.; Navas-Carretero, S.; et al. Effect of Personalized Nutrition on Health-Related Behaviour Change: Evidence from the Food4Me European Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zenun Franco, R.; Fallaize, R.; Weech, M.; Hwang, F.; Lovegrove, J.A. Effectiveness of Web-Based Personalized Nutrition Advice for Adults Using the eNutri Web App: Evidence From the EatWellUK Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e29088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Nielsen, D.E.; Shih, S.; El-Sohemy, A. Perceptions of Genetic Testing for Personalized Nutrition: A Randomized Trial of DNA-Based Dietary Advice. J. Nutr. Nutr. 2014, 7, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Horne, J.; Madill, J.; Gilliland, J. Incorporating the “Theory of Planned Behavior” into Personalized Healthcare Behavior Change Research: A Call to Action. Pers. Med. 2017, 14, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Drabsch, T.; Holzapfel, C. A Scientific Perspective of Personalised Gene-Based Dietary Recommendations for Weight Management. Nutrients 2019, 11, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Horne, J.; Gilliland, J.; O’Connor, C.; Seabrook, J.; Madill, J. Enhanced Long-Term Dietary Change and Adherence in a Nutrigenomics-Guided Lifestyle Intervention Compared to a Population-Based (GLB/DPP) Lifestyle Intervention for Weight Management: Results from the NOW Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2020, 3, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Popkin, B.M.; Adair, L.S.; Ng, S.W. Global Nutrition Transition and the Pandemic of Obesity in Developing Countries. Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Smith, A.D.; Crippa, A.; Woodcock, J.; Brage, S. Physical Activity and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Diabetologia 2016, 59, 2527–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Adams, M.A.; Hurley, J.C.; Todd, M.; Bhuiyan, N.; Jarrett, C.L.; Tucker, W.J.; Hollingshead, K.E.; Angadi, S.S. Adaptive Goal Setting and Financial Incentives: A 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Adults’ Physical Activity. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jakicic, J.M.; Davis, K.K.; Rogers, R.J.; King, W.C.; Marcus, M.D.; Helsel, D.; Rickman, A.D.; Wahed, A.S.; Belle, S.H. Effect of Wearable Technology Combined with a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-Term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016, 316, 1161–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Joseph, R.P.; Keller, C.; Adams, M.A.; Ainsworth, B.E. Print versus a Culturally-Relevant Facebook and Text Message Delivered Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in African American Women: A Randomized Pilot Trial. BMC Womens Health 2015, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Marsaux, C.F.; Celis-Morales, C.; Fallaize, R.; Macready, A.L.; Kolossa, S.; Woolhead, C.; O’Donovan, C.B.; Forster, H.; Navas-Carretero, S.; San-Cristobal, R.; et al. Effects of a Web-Based Personalized Intervention on Physical Activity in European Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, e231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Godino, J.G.; van Sluijs, E.M.F.; Marteau, T.M.; Sutton, S.; Sharp, S.J.; Griffin, S.J. Lifestyle Advice Combined with Personalized Estimates of Genetic or Phenotypic Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, and Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med. 2016, 13, e1002185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Nielsen, D.E.; Carere, D.A.; Wang, C.; Roberts, J.S.; Green, R.C.; Green, R.C.; Krier, J.B.; Kalia, S.S.; Christensen, K.D.; Nielsen, D.E.; et al. Diet and Exercise Changes Following Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing. BMC Med. Genom. 2017, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Anhê, F.F.; Varin, T.V.; Schertzer, J.D.; Marette, A. The Gut Microbiota as a Mediator of Metabolic Benefits after Bariatric Surgery. Can. J. Diabetes 2017, 41, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Qin, Q.; Yan, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, T.; Gao, X.; Yan, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; et al. A Metagenome-Wide Association Study of the Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Syndrome. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 682721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Davis, C.D. The Gut Microbiome and Its Role in Obesity. Nutr. Today 2016, 51, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Fan, Y.; Pedersen, O. Gut Microbiota in Human Metabolic Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wiciński, M.; Gębalski, J.; Gołębiewski, J.; Malinowski, B. Probiotics for the Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Humans—A Review of Clinical Trials. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Shirvani-Rad, S.; Tabatabaei-Malazy, O.; Mohseni, S.; Hasani-Ranjbar, S.; Soroush, A.-R.; Hoseini-Tavassol, Z.; Ejtahed, H.-S.; Larijani, B. Probiotics as a Complementary Therapy for Management of Obesity: A Systematic Review. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021, 2021, 6688450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hijová, E. Synbiotic Supplements in the Prevention of Obesity and Obesity-Related Diseases. Metabolites 2022, 12, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Zhang, Z.; Mocanu, V.; Cai, C.; Dang, J.; Slater, L.; Deehan, E.C.; Walter, J.; Madsen, K.L. Impact of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome—A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Puljiz, Z.; Kumric, M.; Vrdoljak, J.; Martinovic, D.; Ticinovic Kurir, T.; Krnic, M.O.; Urlic, H.; Puljiz, Z.; Zucko, J.; Dumanic, P.; et al. Obesity, Gut Microbiota, and Metabolome: From Pathophysiology to Nutritional Interventions. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ley, R.E.; Bäckhed, F.; Turnbaugh, P.; Lozupone, C.A.; Knight, R.D.; Gordon, J.I. Obesity Alters Gut Microbial Ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11070–11075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Jardon, K.M.; Canfora, E.E.; Goossens, G.H.; Blaak, E.E. Dietary Macronutrients and the Gut Microbiome: A Precision Nutrition Approach to Improve Cardiometabolic Health. Gut 2022, 71, 1214–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tremaroli, V.; Karlsson, F.; Werling, M.; Ståhlman, M.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Olbers, T.; Fändriks, L.; le Roux, C.W.; Nielsen, J.; Bäckhed, F. Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Induce Long-Term Changes on the Human Gut Microbiome Contributing to Fat Mass Regulation. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, H.; DiBaise, J.K.; Zuccolo, A.; Kudrna, D.; Braidotti, M.; Yu, Y.; Parameswaran, P.; Crowell, M.D.; Wing, R.; Rittmann, B.E.; et al. Human Gut Microbiota in Obesity and after Gastric Bypass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2365–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Oliphant, K.; Allen-Vercoe, E. Macronutrient Metabolism by the Human Gut Microbiome: Major Fermentation by-Products and Their Impact on Host Health. Microbiome 2019, 7, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zeevi, D.; Korem, T.; Zmora, N.; Israeli, D.; Rothschild, D.; Weinberger, A.; Ben-Yacov, O.; Lador, D.; Avnit-Sagi, T.; Lotan-Pompan, M.; et al. Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. Cell 2015, 163, 1079–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ansari, S.; Haboubi, H.; Haboubi, N. Adult Obesity Complications: Challenges and Clinical Impact. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 11, 2042018820934955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Evans, M.; de Courcy, J.; de Laguiche, E.; Faurby, M.; Haase, C.L.; Matthiessen, K.S.; Moore, A.; Pearson-Stuttard, J. Obesity-Related Complications, Healthcare Resource Use and Weight Loss Strategies in Six European Countries: The RESOURCE Survey. Int. J. Obes. 2023, 47, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kinlen, D.; Cody, D.; O’Shea, D. Complications of Obesity. QJM Int. J. Med. 2018, 111, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Stephenson, J.; Smith, C.M.; Kearns, B.; Haywood, A.; Bissell, P. The Association between Obesity and Quality of Life: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large-Scale Population-Based Cohort Study. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Katz, D.A.; McHorney, C.A.; Atkinson, R.L. Impact of Obesity on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Illness. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2000, 15, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Olokoba, A.B.; Obateru, O.A.; Olokoba, L.B. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Trends. Oman Med. J. 2012, 27, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bawady, N.; Aldafrawy, O.; ElZobair, E.M.; Suliman, W.; Alzaabi, A.; Ahmed, S.H. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Visiting PHC in the Dubai Health Authority. Dubai Diabetes Endocrinol. J. 2021, 28, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Grant, B.; Sandelson, M.; Agyemang-Prempeh, B.; Zalin, A. Managing Obesity in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Clin. Med. 2021, 21, e327–e231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Dunn, T.N.; Adams, S.H. Relations between Metabolic Homeostasis, Diet, and Peripheral Afferent Neuron Biology. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kheriji, N.; Boukhalfa, W.; Mahjoub, F.; Hechmi, M.; Dakhlaoui, T.; Mrad, M.; Hadj Salah Bahlous, A.; Ben Amor, N.; Jamoussi, H.; Kefi, R. The Role of Dietary Intake in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Importance of Macro and Micronutrients in Glucose Homeostasis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Guo, Y.; Huang, Z.; Sang, D.; Gao, Q.; Li, Q. The Role of Nutrition in the Prevention and Intervention of Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 575442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Picó, C.; Serra, F.; Rodríguez, A.M.; Keijer, J.; Palou, A. Biomarkers of Nutrition and Health: New Tools for New Approaches. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Potischman, N. Biologic and Methodologic Issues for Nutritional Biomarkers. J. Nutr. 2003, 133 (Suppl. S3), 875S–880S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. De Toro-Martín, J.; Arsenault, B.J.; Després, J.-P.; Vohl, M.-C. Precision Nutrition: A Review of Personalized Nutritional Approaches for the Prevention and Management of Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients 2017, 9, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ley, S.H.; Hamdy, O.; Mohan, V.; Hu, F.B. Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Dietary Components and Nutritional Strategies. Lancet 2014, 383, 1999–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Ortega-Azorín, C.; Sorlí, J.V.; Asensio, E.M.; Coltell, O.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Covas, M.-I.; Arós, F.; Lapetra, J.; Serra-Majem, L.; et al. Associations of the FTO Rs9939609 and the MC4R Rs17782313 Polymorphisms with Type 2 Diabetes Are Modulated by Diet, Being Higher When Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Pattern Is Low. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2012, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Shaat, N.; Lernmark, A.; Karlsson, E.; Ivarsson, S.; Parikh, H.; Berntorp, K.; Groop, L. A Variant in the Transcription Factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) Gene Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetologia 2007, 50, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Larsen, N.; Vogensen, F.K.; van den Berg, F.W.J.; Nielsen, D.S.; Andreasen, A.S.; Pedersen, B.K.; Al-Soud, W.A.; Sørensen, S.J.; Hansen, L.H.; Jakobsen, M. Gut Microbiota in Human Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Differs from Non-Diabetic Adults. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Vital, M.; Howe, A.C.; Tiedje, J.M. Revealing the Bacterial Butyrate Synthesis Pathways by Analyzing (Meta)Genomic Data. mBio 2014, 5, e00889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Pedersen, H.K.; Gudmundsdottir, V.; Nielsen, H.B.; Hyotylainen, T.; Nielsen, T.; Jensen, B.A.H.; Forslund, K.; Hildebrand, F.; Prifti, E.; Falony, G.; et al. Human Gut Microbes Impact Host Serum Metabolome and Insulin Sensitivity. Nature 2016, 535, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gojda, J.; Cahova, M. Gut Microbiota as the Link between Elevated BCAA Serum Levels and Insulin Resistance. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Nilsson, A.; Akrami, R.; Lee, Y.S.; De Vadder, F.; Arora, T.; Hallen, A.; Martens, E.; Björck, I.; Bäckhed, F. Dietary Fiber-Induced Improvement in Glucose Metabolism Is Associated with Increased Abundance of Prevotella. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 971–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Korpela, K.; Flint, H.J.; Johnstone, A.M.; Lappi, J.; Poutanen, K.; Dewulf, E.; Delzenne, N.; de Vos, W.M.; Salonen, A. Gut Microbiota Signatures Predict Host and Microbiota Responses to Dietary Interventions in Obese Individuals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Bhatnagar, A. Environmental Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Mir, R.; Elfaki, I.; Javid, J.; Barnawi, J.; Altayar, M.A.; Albalawi, S.O.; Jalal, M.M.; Tayeb, F.J.; Yousif, A.; Ullah, M.F.; et al. Genetic Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease: The Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 (eNOS3), Krüppel-Like Factor-14 (KLF-14), Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR), MiRNAs27a and Their Association with the Predisposition and Susceptibility to Coronary Artery Disease. Life 2022, 12, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Soliman, G.A. Dietary Fiber, Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Savarese, G.; Becher, P.M.; Lund, L.H.; Seferovic, P.; Rosano, G.M.C.; Coats, A.J.S. Global Burden of Heart Failure: A Comprehensive and Updated Review of Epidemiology. Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 118, 3272–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wickman, B.E.; Enkhmaa, B.; Ridberg, R.; Romero, E.; Cadeiras, M.; Meyers, F.; Steinberg, F. Dietary Management of Heart Failure: DASH Diet and Precision Nutrition Perspectives. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Levitan, E.B.; Wolk, A.; Mittleman, M.A. Consistency with the DASH Diet and Incidence of Heart Failure. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Estruch, R.; Ros, E.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Covas, M.-I.; Corella, D.; Arós, F.; Gómez-Gracia, E.; Ruiz-Gutiérrez, V.; Fiol, M.; Lapetra, J.; et al. Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. King, D.E. Dietary Fiber, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2005, 49, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Li, F.; Chen, L.; Liu, B.; Zhong, V.W.; Deng, Y.; Luo, D.; Gao, C.; Bao, W.; Rong, S. Frequency of Adding Salt at the Table and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Fan, H.; Zhou, J.; Huang, Y.; Feng, X.; Dang, P.; Li, G.; Yuan, Z. A Proinflammatory Diet Is Associated with Higher Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Hariharan, R.; Odjidja, E.N.; Scott, D.; Shivappa, N.; Hébert, J.R.; Hodge, A.; de Courten, B. The Dietary Inflammatory Index, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Diseases. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Syed Soffian, S.S.; Mohammed Nawi, A.; Hod, R.; Ja’afar, M.H.; Isa, Z.M.; Chan, H.-K.; Hassan, M.R.A. Meta-Analysis of the Association between Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Shivappa, N.; Godos, J.; Hébert, J.R.; Wirth, M.D.; Piuri, G.; Speciani, A.F.; Grosso, G. Dietary Inflammatory Index and Cardiovascular Risk and Mortality—A Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Chen, C.; Yang, T.; Wang, C. The Dietary Inflammatory Index and Early COPD: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Jia, G.; Wu, C.-C.; Su, C.-H. Dietary Inflammatory Index and Metabolic Syndrome in US Children and Adolescents: Evidence from NHANES 2001–2018. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 19, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Motamedi, A.; Askari, M.; Mozaffari, H.; Homayounfrar, R.; Nikparast, A.; Ghazi, M.L.; Nejad, M.M.; Alizadeh, S. Dietary Inflammatory Index in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2022, 2022, 9953115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhang, C.; Qiu, S.; Bian, H.; Tian, B.; Wang, H.; Tu, X.; Cai, B.; Jin, K.; Zheng, X.; Yang, L.; et al. Association between Dietary Inflammatory Index and Kidney Stones in US Adults: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2016. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 24, 6113–6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Naqvi, A.Z.; Davis, R.B.; Mukamal, K.J. Nutrient Intake and Peripheral Artery Disease in Adults: Key Considerations in Cross-Sectional Studies. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Antonopoulou, S.; Demopoulos, C.A. Protective Effect of Olive Oil Microconstituents in Atherosclerosis: Emphasis on PAF Implicated Atherosclerosis Theory. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Krieghoff-Henning, E.; Folkerts, J.; Penzkofer, A.; Weg-Remers, S. Cancer—An Overview. Med. Monatsschr. Pharm. 2017, 40, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  187. Lauby-Secretan, B.; Scoccianti, C.; Loomis, D.; Grosse, Y.; Bianchini, F.; Straif, K.; International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. Body Fatness and Cancer—Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 794–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Larsson, S.C.; Spyrou, N.; Mantzoros, C.S. Body Fatness Associations with Cancer: Evidence from Recent Epidemiological Studies and Future Directions. Metabolism 2022, 137, 155326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Tumminia, A.; Vinciguerra, F.; Parisi, M.; Graziano, M.; Sciacca, L.; Baratta, R.; Frittitta, L. Adipose Tissue, Obesity and Adiponectin: Role in Endocrine Cancer Risk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Dimou, N.L.; Papadimitriou, N.; Mariosa, D.; Johansson, M.; Brennan, P.; Peters, U.; Chanock, S.J.; Purdue, M.; Bishop, D.T.; Gago-Dominquez, M.; et al. Circulating Adipokine Concentrations and Risk of Five Obesity-related Cancers: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 148, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Reglero, C.; Reglero, G. Precision Nutrition and Cancer Relapse Prevention: A Systematic Literature Review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Khiewkamrop, P.; Surangkul, D.; Srikummool, M.; Richert, L.; Pekthong, D.; Parhira, S.; Somran, J.; Srisawang, P. Epigallocatechin Gallate Triggers Apoptosis by Suppressing de Novo Lipogenesis in Colorectal Carcinoma Cells. FEBS Open Bio 2022, 12, 937–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Mossine, V.V.; Mawhinney, T.P.; Giovannucci, E.L. Dried Fruit Intake and Cancer: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Ubago-Guisado, E.; Rodríguez-Barranco, M.; Ching-López, A.; Petrova, D.; Molina-Montes, E.; Amiano, P.; Barricarte-Gurrea, A.; Chirlaque, M.-D.; Agudo, A.; Sánchez, M.-J. Evidence Update on the Relationship between Diet and the Most Common Cancers from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Gaesser, G.A. Whole Grains, Refined Grains, and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Khan, N.; Afaq, F.; Mukhtar, H. Apoptosis by Dietary Factors: The Suicide Solution for Delaying Cancer Growth. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 16 00581 g001
Figure 1. The factors affecting individuals’ dietary responses.
Figure 1. The factors affecting individuals’ dietary responses.
Nutrients 16 00581 g001
Nutrients 16 00581 g002
Figure 2. Factors affecting individuals’ intestinal microbiota. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and irritable bowel disease (IBD).
Figure 2. Factors affecting individuals’ intestinal microbiota. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and irritable bowel disease (IBD).
Nutrients 16 00581 g002
Nutrients 16 00581 g003
Figure 3. Evidence-based nutritional biomarkers in plasma and urine samples.
Figure 3. Evidence-based nutritional biomarkers in plasma and urine samples.
Nutrients 16 00581 g003
Table 1. The role of genetic variants in weight management and metabolic phenotypes.
Table 1. The role of genetic variants in weight management and metabolic phenotypes.
Type of IllnessType of InterventionnGenetic ComponentKey FindingRef.
Obesity2 years of dietary intervention322Leptin (LEP) SNPs *Possibility of regaining weight from 7 to 24 months[81]
2 years of dietary intervention742Fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) SNP rs1558902A high-protein diet in the presence of FTO genotype:
(1) Remarkable weight loss
(2) Amelioration in body composition and lipid distribution		[82]
4 years of lifestyle-based intervention 3899SNPsFollowing weight loss, a risk of regaining weight was linked to FTO and BDNF loci[83]
2 years of lifestyle-based intervention and metformin use3819Melanocortin 4 Receptor gene (MC4R) SNPsIn the intervention group, the rs17066866 marker was associated with:
(1) Less short-term weight loss (first 6-month period)
(2) Less long-term weight loss (first 2-year period)		[84]
Diabetes2 years of dietary intervention738Insulin receptor substrate 1 gene (IRS1) rs2943641Altered intrinsic effect of dietary carbohydrate on weight loss and insulin resistance[85]
2 years of dietary intervention591Transcription Factor 7-Like 2 (TCF7L2) SNP rs7903146Interaction between dietary fat intake and TCF7L2 🡪 modified BMI as well as total and trunk fat mass[86]
9 months of dietary intervention304TCF7L2 SNP rs7903146Interaction between high-fibre dietary intake and CC genotype 🡪 improved weight loss[87]
2 years of dietary intervention737Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) SNP rs2287019Interaction of dietary carbohydrates with GIPR genotype 🡪 modifications in body weight, fasting glucose, and insulin resistance[88,89]
2 years of dietary intervention738IRS1 SNP rs1522813Changes in dietary fat effects based on both IRS1 genotype and MetS status [89,90]
Obesity, diabetes, or hypertension4 months of dietary and medical intervention72221 SNPsInteraction between dietary intervention and SNPs leads to changes in blood pressure[91]
Hypertension2 years of dietary intervention723Neuropeptide Y Promoter (NPY) SNP rs16147Interaction between dietary fat and NPY genotype, modifying blood pressure[92]
* Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); n: sample size; Ref.: Reference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mansour, S.; Alkhaaldi, S.M.I.; Sammanasunathan, A.F.; Ibrahim, S.; Farhat, J.; Al-Omari, B. Precision Nutrition Unveiled: Gene–Nutrient Interactions, Microbiota Dynamics, and Lifestyle Factors in Obesity Management. Nutrients 2024, 16, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050581

AMA Style

Mansour S, Alkhaaldi SMI, Sammanasunathan AF, Ibrahim S, Farhat J, Al-Omari B. Precision Nutrition Unveiled: Gene–Nutrient Interactions, Microbiota Dynamics, and Lifestyle Factors in Obesity Management. Nutrients. 2024; 16(5):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mansour, Samy, Saif M. I. Alkhaaldi, Ashwin F. Sammanasunathan, Saleh Ibrahim, Joviana Farhat, and Basem Al-Omari. 2024. "Precision Nutrition Unveiled: Gene–Nutrient Interactions, Microbiota Dynamics, and Lifestyle Factors in Obesity Management" Nutrients 16, no. 5: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050581

APA Style

Mansour, S., Alkhaaldi, S. M. I., Sammanasunathan, A. F., Ibrahim, S., Farhat, J., & Al-Omari, B. (2024). Precision Nutrition Unveiled: Gene–Nutrient Interactions, Microbiota Dynamics, and Lifestyle Factors in Obesity Management. Nutrients, 16(5), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop