Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities of Several Garlic Forms
Previous Article in Journal
Quantity and Variety of Fruit and Vegetable Intake with Changes in Measures of Adiposity among Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antimicrobial Properties of Capsaicin: Available Data and Future Research Perspectives

by
Aristodemos-Theodoros Periferakis
1,2,†,
Argyrios Periferakis
1,2,3,†,
Konstantinos Periferakis
3,4,*,
Ana Caruntu
5,6,
Ioana Anca Badarau
1,
Ilinca Savulescu-Fiedler
7,8,
Cristian Scheau
1,9,* and
Constantin Caruntu
1,10
1
Department of Physiology, The “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Elkyda, Research & Education Centre of Charismatheia, 17675 Athens, Greece
3
Akadimia of Ancient Greek and Traditional Chinese Medicine, 16675 Athens, Greece
4
Pan-Hellenic Organization of Educational Programs (P.O.E.P), 17236 Athens, Greece
5
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, “Carol Davila” Central Military Emergency Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
6
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
7
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Coltea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
8
Department of Internal Medicine, The “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
9
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, “Foisor” Clinical Hospital of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Osteoarticular TB, 021382 Bucharest, Romania
10
Department of Dermatology, ‘Prof. N.C. Paulescu’ National Institute of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, 011233 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2023, 15(19), 4097; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194097
Submission received: 26 August 2023 / Revised: 13 September 2023 / Accepted: 20 September 2023 / Published: 22 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemicals and Human Health)

Abstract

:
Capsaicin is a phytochemical derived from plants of the genus Capsicum and subject of intensive phytochemical research due to its numerous physiological and therapeutical effects, including its important antimicrobial properties. Depending on the concentration and the strain of the bacterium, capsaicin can exert either bacteriostatic or even bactericidal effects against a wide range of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, while in certain cases it can reduce their pathogenicity by a variety of mechanisms such as mitigating the release of toxins or inhibiting biofilm formation. Likewise, capsaicin has been shown to be effective against fungal pathogens, particularly Candida spp., where it once again interferes with biofilm formation. The parasites Toxoplasma gondi and Trypanosoma cruzi have been found to be susceptible to the action of this compound too while there are also viruses whose invasiveness is significantly dampened by it. Among the most encouraging findings are the prospects for future development, especially using new formulations and drug delivery mechanisms. Finally, the influence of capsaicin in somatostatin and substance P secretion and action, offers an interesting array of possibilities given that these physiologically secreted compounds modulate inflammation and immune response to a significant extent.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging threat identified by the World Health Organization and represents a global concern due to newly-acquired resistance mechanisms in a multitude of pathogens [1]. Antimicrobial drugs misuse as well as clinical and non-clinical pathogen transmission have contributed to the development of antimicrobial resistance, therefore novel antimicrobials are actively researched to combat this menace [2].
In the last decades there has been an increasing interest in the development of new antimicrobial substances from plants, as evidenced by a multitude of research on the subject (e.g., [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]). This renewed interest is based on the long-standing medical practices of various traditional medical systems, where plants and their derived extracts have been reported to have a host of applications. One important such substance is capsaicin, a chemical compound derived from plants of the Capsicum species [17].
Capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide) is a nitrogen-containing substance belonging to the lipids group [18]. While capsaicin was a term originally used to refer to a host of compounds isolated from C. oleoresin, nowadays it is a substance-specific name, while the rest of the originally associated substances are called capsaicinoids [19].
When isolated in its pure form, capsaicin (C18H27NO3) is a solid, colourless, hydrophobic, highly volatile, and highly pungent substance [20], which will produce toxic fumes if heated to decomposition levels [21]. The naturally occurring form of capsaicin is its trans form [22]. The biosynthetic pathway of capsaicin was originally described in the 1960s [23,24,25,26]. A number of methods to artificially synthesize capsaicin have been described [27].
Based on its properties, capsaicin is already used in a number of applications, as a component of animal repellents [28,29,30], fragrances [31,32], pesticides [33,34], and also in veterinary medicine [35,36]. A number of medical uses were reported, most notably as a treatment for chronic pain [37,38,39,40] and pruritus [41,42,43,44]; other minor uses have also been described by various researchers [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. It should be noted that capsaicin is also capable of inducing local inflammation [53], a process which can be objectively measured through modern imaging applications [54,55].
In this paper, we will present a thorough and representative view of the studies regarding the actions and effects of capsaicin against bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses. For this review, we carried an exploratory search using the Pubmed database from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) of the United States of America (available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; accessed on 25 August 2023) which includes over 36 million citations for the biomedical literature from MEDLINE as well as other scientific sources. We used “capsaicin”, “antimicrobial action”, “antibacterial”, “antifungal”, “antiviral”, and “antiparasitic” as keywords, and included all relevant papers on the topic. We further supplemented the search in other databases such Google Scholar and Scopus. For each pathogen, we presented its relative importance in a clear and comprehensive way, based on current clinical evidence. By also describing the molecular mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial effects of capsaicin, we hope to depict a complete picture of the current corpus of knowledge on the subject and point out promising future research perspectives including the need to develop and test new capsaicin formulations.

2. Antibacterial Properties of Capsaicin

In the last decades, the use of plant metabolites against bacteria has been on the foreground of phytomedical and microbiological research (e.g., [56,57,58,59,60,61]). Capsaicin in particular has been the focus of recent research as a potential solution against antibiotic resistance [62]. Apart from finding natural alternatives to antibiotics, this is important both for those patients in which some antibiotics may be toxic—typical examples include allergies [63,64,65], liver toxicity [66,67,68,69], and other side effects [70]—and also, and perhaps more significantly, due to the increasing antibiotic resistance [71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. The rapid increase in antibiotic resistance is mainly explained by the overuse of antibiotics [78,79,80] and the high adaptability of bacteria in general, which may survive, depending on the species, even in extreme environments such as hot springs (e.g., [81,82,83]). The research on the antibacterial properties of capsaicin is extensive (Table 1) and this leaves open many potential choices for new drug design. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) represents the lowest concentration of an antibacterial agent which, under in vitro conditions, totally prevents the visible growth in the tested strain [84]. Assessing this value is relevant to ensure the effectiveness of the antibiotic substance while limiting its administration to prevent adverse effects.

2.1. Antibacterial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterium that can frequently colonize the human body [94]. However, it is also known to cause a variety of diseases ranging from food poisoning to infections of the skin, such as scalded skin syndrome [95], or in the most severe cases, pneumonia and bacterial endocarditis [96,97]. Its biochemical arsenal comprises many toxins such as its enterotoxin and its exfoliative toxins, which are responsible for the aforementioned food poisoning and skin infections, respectively, and its hemolysin, called α-toxin [98]. Regarding the enterotoxin of S. aureus, it should also be mentioned that it is a super-antigen [98]. The emergence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, also known as MRSA, is an important factor of concern both in a medical setting and from an economic point of view [99,100]. There are several types of MRSA such as the healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), the community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), and the livestock-acquired MRSA (LA-MRSA) [101].
Capsaicin has potent action against S. aureus [102]. Specifically, it has been shown to affect the cellular viability of staphylococcal cells, exhibiting partial to total bactericidal effects, depending on the tested variety and the dilution level [88]. The extract of Bhut Jolokia Red is particularly potent in this regard, exhibiting partial bactericidal action even at 1:16 dilution [88]. Other studies have concluded that the effects on the growth in S. aureus colonies are more pronounced in the variety Noga Bhut when compared with the variety Roja Bhut [86]. When tested on mice, evidence suggests that capsaicin can have a protective role in staphylococcal pneumonia, as it was found to suppress the production of α-toxin and alleviate the inflammatory reaction [103].

2.2. Antibacterial Activity against Group A Hemolytic Streptococci

Streptococcal infections are associated with several pathologies such as skin infections, pharyngitis, pneumonia [104,105], and a critical condition known as toxic shock syndrome (TSS) [98]. Furthermore, due to the nature of protein M, one of the bacterium’s major antigens, virulence is high and reinfection with different M strains is a possible occurrence [105,106,107]. Other important parts of this bacterium’s antigenic structure are its pyrogenic toxin and its erythrogenic toxin, which are classified as superantigens [108], while it should also be mentioned that the species belonging to the category of group A hemolytic streptococci, most notable of them being S. pyogenes, owe this trait of theirs to their hemolysin, streptolysin O [109]. Perhaps the most notable trait of Streptococcus are the so-called post-streptococcal diseases, a group of severe sequelae which includes glomerulonephritis, rheumatic fever, and rheumatic heart disease, brought about due to different types of hypersensitivity reaction [104,106]. Macrolides, for example erythromycin, are becoming less and less effective as resistant strains emerge, and this poses a problem in the treatment of streptococcal infections in patients who are allergic to β-lactam antibiotics to which the bacterium is still susceptible [87,106].
Capsaicin was found in vitro to affect the biofilm formation and epithelial cell adhesion of species belonging to Group A hemolytic streptococci, reducing their invasiveness, while also having bactericidal action [87]. Moreover, the hemolytic activity of these species was diminished by a notable amount [87]. Apart from S. pyogenes, S. mutans has also been found to be susceptible to capsaicin [102].

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity against Enterococcus Species

The most notable species of enterococci are E. faecium and E. faecalis [110]. In recent years, enterococci have become the source of a considerable number of nosocomial infections [111] which can be of high severity [112,113]. The emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is a source of concern which indicates that alternative treatment options should be looked into [114].
Research results indicate that capsaicin can be used to inhibit the growth in E. faecalis, although it should be mentioned that its MIC was among the higher ones during the tests conducted by Nascimento et al. [85]. This can be possibly attributed to the fact that this bacterium, like others inhibited by similar MIC values, such as B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa, utilize capsaicin as a nutrient for growth [115]. However, dihydrocapsaicin exhibited lower MIC values than capsaicin in the aforementioned study, while also presenting a selective bactericidal effect related to cellular wall characteristics [85].

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity against Bacillus Species

Bacteria of the Bacillus genus are aerobic [116] and have a characteristic spore-forming ability, becoming resistant to the action of disinfectants as well as unfavourable environmental conditions [117,118]. Most species of the Bacillus genus are not pathogenic, the most notable exceptions being B. anthracis and B. cereus which associate increased mortality [119].
B. subtilis is non-pathogenic but the study of the action of capsaicin against it could be beneficial in understanding the action mechanisms against the aforementioned pathogenic species. Evidence from different sources [85,120] suggests that capsaicin is capable of inhibiting the growth in B. subtilis though at a comparatively higher MIC than most other bacteria [85]. Conversely, the species B. thuringiensis did not seem to be nearly as susceptible to the action of capsaicin [102]. Although B. thuringiensis is not pathogenic for humans, this finding may be of relevance, given the use of B. thuringiensis as a biopesticide [121].

2.5. Antimicrobial Activity against Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is a species of ubiquitous, intracellular bacteria responsible for foodborne pathologies, capable of causing severe complications such as meningoencephalitis, especially in risk groups like immunosuppressed individuals, as well as pregnant women and foetuses, where abortion and septic premature death/neonatal death can occur [122,123,124]. The bacterium owes its intracellular nature to a variety of factors, most notably its internalins, which enable it to enter the host cell, and its hemolysin, listeriolysin O, which enables it to escape intracellular vacuoles [123].
The response of L. monocytogenes when exposed to capsaicin varies in lab settings depending on the extract with some displaying bactericidal action and others displaying bacteriostatic action [88]. The extract of Bhut Jolokia Red seems to be among the most effective ones, exhibiting partial bactericidal action even at 1:16 dilution [88].

2.6. Antimicrobial Activity against Vibrio cholerae

Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of one of the oldest diseases known to man, characterized by profuse diarrhoea, which can be commonly found in aquatic ecosystems [125,126]. There are several biotypes which have pathogenic properties, featuring a great number of virulence factors [127]. Resistant strains of Vibrio cholerae are causes of concern [128,129] necessitating the search for alternative methods of treatment.
Capsaicin has been found to significantly reduce the release of cholera toxin by interfering with the transcription of txA, tcpA, and toxT genes while at the same time enhancing the transcription of the hns gene which, in turn, downregulates the transcription of the former genes [89]. It should be mentioned that these results were noted along different serogroups and biotypes of this bacterium [89]. This is an important finding since several among them are responsible for pandemics and, as previously mentioned, some have also developed resistance to conventional antimicrobial agents [130].

2.7. Antimicrobial Activity against Acinetobacter baumanii

Acinetobacter baumannii is implicated in pulmonary infections and septicaemia in immunocompromised patients [131]. Its ability to resist the action of antibiotics and survive in harsh environments [132,133,134] only serves to exacerbate its pathologic nature. Based on the research of Ozçelik et al. [90], capsaicin is effective against A. baumannii at a concentration of 64 μg/mL. Interestingly, the research of Guo et al. [135] showed a lack of direct action of capsaicin against colistin-resistant strains of this bacterium but noted potent synergistic action in the case of combinatory use of these substances in a dose-dependent manner, where colistin MIC was greatly reduced.

2.8. Antimicrobial Activity against Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori is a causative agent of gastric ulcer and gastric cancer that displays increased rates of resistance to previously effective antibiotics such as clarithromycin and, to a lesser extent, metronidazole [136]; it is often characterised by multi-drug resistance patterns [137].
Capsaicin has showed promising bacteriostatic results at in vitro testing [138]. Its effects are exerted at concentrations as low as 25 μG/mL with the best results being achieved at 50 μG/mL, indicating possible use as a treatment option [91]. The usefulness of capsaicin as a treatment option for H. pylori also extends to the fact that it has demonstrated the ability to downregulate the proinflammatory pathway NF-Kb when tested in vivo on mice [139], a finding corroborated by other researchers [140], thereby reducing the extent of the inflammatory response caused by the bacterium and the subsequent gastric damage [139].

2.9. Antimicrobial Activity against Salmonella typhimurium

Salmonella is a common causative agent of foodborne pathologies, which is mainly found in poultry, eggs, and dairy products, that threatens public health worldwide [141,142]. This bacterium displays a great serovariability with over 2600 serotypes having been recorded [143] and with different strains exhibiting different degrees of antigenic variability [144]. There are several strains which are resistant to the action of antibiotics [145,146] and their number is increasing at an alarming rate [147] while, at the same time, the increased virulence of said strains leads to a higher mortality [148].
Capsaicin has been documented as having partial bactericidal effects against Salmonella typhimurium [88]. Pure capsaicin exhibits protein-inhibiting qualities while extract from the plant Capsicum chinense (C. chinense) seems to be even more potent in that regard at the same doses while also preventing infection of Vero cells [92]. Based on the aforementioned data, future studies will hopefully elaborate on the antibacterial actions of capsaicin against other strains of the pathogenic Salmonella spp.

2.10. Antibacterial Activity against Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli is a commensal bacterium found in the gastrointestinal tract which can cause opportunistic infections if it migrates to different locations or when the host becomes immune-suppressed [149]. There have been recorded different types of E. coli, namely the enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), the enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), the enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), the enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), the enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), and the diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) [150]. The emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) E. coli poses a problem that must be addressed in alternative ways such as new antibacterial substances [151,152].
Capsaicin has been shown to have partial bactericidal effects on Escherichia coli O157:H7 [88]. The inhibitory nature of capsaicin against E. coli has been confirmed by another study [85] though other researchers’ findings indicate that capsaicin merely slows down its growth [120]. At any rate, the effects of capsaicin on E. coli colonies are more potent in the case of the variety Roja Bhut when compared with the variety Noga Bhut [86].

2.11. Antibacterial Activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen which infects people worldwide, accounting for one-third of the total Gram-negative bacterial infections [153], and poses a considerable threat particularly in the nosocomial environment [154] where it can cause severe pathologies [155]. Due to strains which are resistant to antibiotics, including even last-line antibiotics, alternative methods of treatment are a necessity [154,156].
There is research evidence which suggests that capsaicin can exert an inhibitory effect on the growth in K. pneumoniae [85]. The usefulness of capsaicin’s action against K. pneumoniae is backed up by similar findings of other researchers [157]. Similarly, a formulation containing honey/tripolyphosphate/chitosan nanofibers loaded with capsaicin and gold nanoparticles was found to have inhibitory action against several bacteria, one of which was a different strain of the bacterium in question called Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis [158].

2.12. Antimicrobial Activity against Proteus Species

Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris are the most notable species of their genus and they are associated with urinary tract infections, like cystitis and pyelonephritis, while there have also been recorded cases of asymptomatic bacteriuria in elderly patients as well as patients with type 2 diabetes [159,160,161]. Urinary stone formation [162] and catheter obstruction in catheterized patients [163] are also possible complications. The severity of the pathologies caused by the aforementioned bacteria can be very severe [162,164], especially given the fact that there is a risk of these urinary stones serving as a focal point for other bacterial infections [164]. Bacteria of the Proteus genus have grown resistant to the action of antibiotics [165,166] and there even exist some MDR Proteus strains [167,168,169,170]. P. vulgaris in particular has been implicated in resistant nosocomial infections [171].
Capsaicin is effective against P. mirabilis as shown by the research of Ozçelik et al. [90]. P. vulgaris on the other hand has shown resistance to the effects exerted by capsaicin in tandem with other substances, which was attributed to its ability to elongate itself and secrete a polysaccharide when in contact with surfaces [102].

2.13. Antimicrobial Activity against Pseudomonas Species

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a bacterium which can cause localized as well as systemic infections which are at times mild but can reach life-threatening severity [172], and is also commonly associated with nosocomial infections [173]. Patients with cystic fibrosis and COPD in particular are a risk group for P. aeruginosa infections [174,175,176]. There are P. aeruginosa strains which are becoming resistant to the action of antibiotics, meaning that new treatment options must be sought [177,178].
Studies have demonstrated the inhibiting properties of capsaicin on the growth in P. aeruginosa colonies even though the MIC is relatively high when compared to that of the other bacterial species tested by Nascimento et al. [85]. Based on the research of Kushwaha et al. [93], capsaicin along with 6-gingerol was able to inhibit the production of rhamnolipids, phenazine, and quinolone among other compounds; this finding may be important in dealing with resistant strains during biofilm formation. Capsaicin has also been shown to slow down the growth in a different species, Pseudomonas solanacearum [120].

3. Capsaicin as an Antifungal Agent

Compared to bacteria, only a limited fraction of fungi are considered to be pathogenic to humans [179]. While the majority of common fungal infections are not life-threatening, some species, such as Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus, can even cause life-threatening infections under specific circumstances. While not as prominent as other pathogens, still they represent a considerable threat [179] and the burden of disease is high at least in specific regions [180,181,182]. Resistance to antifungal drugs is also a matter of concern [183,184,185] as is their side effects in some cases [186,187,188].
The main focus of study for the antifungal effects of capsaicin has been two gena, Candida and Aspergillus (Table 2), which are among the most common human fungal pathogens.

3.1. Antifungal Activity against Candida spp.

Candida spp. are usually benign but under certain circumstances, particularly in the case of Candida albicans, they can cause several pathologies, for example in the oral cavity [192] with many women also contracting vaginal candidiasis [193,194]. However, they have also been implicated in systemic infections of life-threatening severity [195]; this is dependent on the presence of risk factors [196,197]. Lately, the problem has become most evident in the hospital setting [198,199].
There has been extensive research on the susceptibility of Candida spp. to capsaicin, with satisfactory results. Capsaicin exhibits notable inhibiting properties against Candida albicans [85]. This inhibition becomes evident at 1:4 and 1:8 dilutions, with the yeast cells being killed, while the potency of the researched extracts was highlighted by the fact that all of them achieved partial inhibition even at 1:16 and 1:32 dilutions [88]. Capsaicin has also been shown to reduce the mature biofilm of C. albicans by 70–89% [200]. It has been concluded that capsaicin exerts its effects on the yeast cells by preventing ergosterol biosynthesis in the cell wall, thereby altering their shape and compromising their integrity [200]. Other species of Candida, like C. glabrata and C. tropicalis, were even more susceptible than C. albicans with not only their biomass formation being inhibited, but likewise the former’s biofilm-formation capacity being greatly diminished [189]. Indicatively, the MIC of extracts from Capsicum chinense was 1500 μg/mL for C. albicans but only 187.5 μg/mL for C. glabrata [189]. The hemolysis produced was similarly reduced by a significant degree [189]. Another very important finding was the fact that the action of fluconazole against yeast cells is enhanced when combined with capsaicin, which means that there could be a viable way of preventing the development of resistance to the aforementioned drug [200].

3.2. Antifungal Activity against Aspergillus parasiticus

The species of Aspergillus which are most relevant from a medical point of view are A. parasiticus and A. flavus, as they produce aflatoxins, secondary metabolites with harmful effects on both humans and animals [201], most notably carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, and teratogenesis [202]. Due to climate change, these species of Aspergillus can now be found in the soil of many countries worldwide, including Europe [203,204]. Considering that the use of harmful synthetic insecticides is common practice for eliminating A. parasiticus, the need for more environment-friendly methods of eradication has emerged [205].
Nanoparticles containing capsaicin and chitosan were tested against A. parasiticus, and the results were promising in that the incorporation of capsaicin in chitosan-containing lipid nanoparticles maintained a good antifungal effect while reducing the toxicity of the formulation [205]. Research results indicate that capsaicin not only has an inhibitory effect on the growth in A. parasiticus, but it also interferes with the germination of its spores and reduces the production of the aflatoxins [190,191] by suppressing the expression of the relevant genes aflM, aflR, aflS, and especially aflD [190]. This means that capsaicin-based compounds could be a useful source of non-synthetic fungicides [191].

4. Capsaicin as an Antiparasitic Agent

While most parasites are a danger to human health in the areas in which they are endemic [206,207,208], a host of factors may facilitate their spreading [209,210]. Thus, it may be imagined that the burden of disease is potentially considerable [211,212,213] and may increase given the emerging resistance [214,215]; even more so, some antiparasitic drugs, like antimonials, can have significant side effects [216]. Currently, the focus regarding the antiparasitic properties of capsaicin is centred on two species (Table 3).

4.1. Antiparasitic Activity against Toxoplasma gondii

Toxoplasma is an obligate intracellular eukaryotic parasite with a great spread; in fact, it is estimated that it infects up to one-third of the world’s population [218,219]. Oftentimes, infections caused be this protozoon are mild or even asymptomatic [218,220]. Their severity can be life-threatening however in the case of immunocompromised patients and newborns, the latter due to congenital transmission [218,219,220]. Pathologies of the retina and of the central nervous system are the ones most commonly associated with this microorganism [218]. A particularly common problematic finding is the development of tissue cysts which can lead to relapses in case of rupturing when a robust immunity is not present [221,222]. The parasite has a complex life cycle with many forms, namely tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites [221]. Regarding its vector, felines serve as its definitive host and the oocysts developed within them are quite resistant when exposed to environmental conditions [218]. Even though toxoplasma is highly antigenic [220], it has at its disposal many proteins that enable it to evade the defences of our immune system [218,219,220]. T. gondii in particular uses specialized secretory proteins which allow it to invade and replicate within the host cell by modifying some of the latter’s factors [219]. This is achieved by means of interfering with gene transcription and signalling pathways [220]. Pyrimethamine and trimethoprim are the main treatment options but, due to the fact that they cannot distinguish between the enzymes of the parasite and the host, they should be administered together with sulphonamides, most notably sulfadiazine [222]. The result is severe side effects and subsequently, lower compliance rates [222]. There are also mentions of drug-resistant T. gondii strains [223,224]. As such, searching for better alternatives is a medical necessity.
Research results have shown that T. gondii-infected BeWo cells show inhibited proliferation when treated with non-toxic concentrations of capsaicin in twofold serial dilutions, with the half inhibitory concentration (IC50) against its tachyzoites being 42.12 μg/mL [189]. From a pharmacological point of view, combinatory use of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine alongside capsaicin yielded much better results than both of the two drugs combined or capsaicin alone [189].

4.2. Antiparasitic Activity against Trypanosoma cruzi

The most notable species of Trypanosoma are T. brucei, T. gambiense and T. rhodesiense. The main associated pathology is sleeping sickness, a disease endemic to African countries [225]. Its vectors are the Glossina flies, without excluding transmission by other blood-sucking insects [226,227]. The drugs used for the treatment of this condition are of two categories; the blood–brain barrier-crossing drugs, indicatively melarsoprol, eflornithine and nifurtimox, and the non-blood–brain barrier-crossing drugs like pentamidine and suramin [228]. Resistant strains are not prevalent but nor are they unheard of [229]. There is also T. cruzi, which is the causative agent of Chagas disease, which also has a zoonotic transmission [229].
T. cruzi was found to be susceptible to the action of capsaicin, with its trypomastigotes being affected more than its epimastigotes [217]. Although the research did not manage to find the exact target of capsaicin, its efficacy is undeniable considering that it exerted its effects in nanomolar concentrations with a potency many times higher than benznidazole, the drug mainly used for treatment of Chagas disease [217]. Findings also suggested that a capsaicin-based treatment could have an oral administration, another upside as far as therapeutical considerations are concerned [217].

5. Capsaicin as an Antiviral Agent

There have been many studies in the last few years documenting the extensive burden of disease from common viral pathogens [230,231,232,233]. Given that for many of the most common viral pathogens, there is a pattern of increasing resistance to antiviral drugs and recombinant strains emergence [234,235,236,237,238,239], and many viruses are associated with severe persistent pathological features [240,241,242,243,244,245], the research on natural antiviral substances is ever more important.
The emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [246,247] highlighted that despite the important progress in antiviral medicines, there are still significant gaps in our antiviral arsenal. Given the existence of deadly viruses, which could be potential pandemic-inducing agents, like the Marburg [248,249] and Ebola [250,251] viruses, and the existence of other viruses where there is not any fully effective therapeutical scheme, like the rabies virus [252,253], the need for novel antiviral agents becomes ever more evident. Unfortunately, comparatively little research has been undertaken in the antiviral front, and at the moment, it can be certainly said that capsaicin is definitively effective against only a limited number of viral pathogens (Table 4).

5.1. Antiviral Activity against the Influenza Virus

The influenza virus is a highly contagious virus that affects mainly the respiratory system and is characterized by high antigenic variability due to the genetic alterations it often undergoes [256,257,258]. This is true especially for type A influenza which is prone to causing pandemics [258]. Influenza’s antigenic variability comprises the antigenic shift and the antigenic drift it exhibits, the former being the cause of the aforementioned pandemics [259] and the latter necessitating constant updating of the vaccines [257]. A variety of medication is used for treatment, most notably the protein M-inhibiting drugs amantadine and rimantadine, to which the virus is now greatly resistant [260], the cap-dependent endonuclease-inhibiting drugs like baloxavir and marboxil [261,262], which can also be used for prophylactic purposes [263], and neuraminidase-inhibiting drugs like oseltamivir [257]. However, the available treatment loses a considerable part of its efficacy if it is not administered within the first stages of the infection, with the first 24 h being the optimal time frame, and 48 h being the end of the period during which drug administration can be expected to reliably produce the desired outcome [258]. A very serious possible complication is Reye’s syndrome, a pathology with diverse symptomatology which occurs in children that are infected with a virus, the causes of which are not yet clear, but it is thought to be caused by consuming acetylsalicylic acid in the context of the viral infection [264].
A case study showed that capsaicin may be used effectively to affect the viral neuraminidase, which is integral in the cellular invasion process [254]. Interestingly, a type of capsaicin-sensitive neurons of the respiratory tract may be instrumental in combating influenza infections, after they have been activated by capsaicin [265], but this is still the subject of further research.

5.2. Antiviral Activity against the Lassa Virus

Lassa virus (LASV) is an endemic pathogen in West Africa responsible for causing a haemorrhagic fever by the same name [266]. The reservoir of the virus are the rodents Mastomys nataliensis [267,268]. The pathogen has been recently recorded outside of its endemic radius [268], a reason for concern among the healthcare professionals. The World Health Organization (WHO) has incentivized the development of a vaccine against Lassa [268], which should come as no surprise given its high morbidity and mortality [268] as well as the limited therapeutic options currently available [255].
Capsaicin has been found to be able to inhibit the entry of Lassa virus into permissible cells by blocking the LASV-GP mediated fusion and by binding directly to the LASV pseudovirions [255]. The inhibition of entry is made possible due to the fact that capsaicin affects the stable signal peptide-GP2 transmembrane region of the virus’ glycoprotein [255]. Despite Lassa’s great genetic diversity, capsaicin proved to be effective in comparable rates against multiple different strains [255].

6. Discussion

The rapid development of phytochemistry during the last decades offers new possibilities and opportunities in the fight against numerous different pathogens. The approaches of phytomedicine are based both in traditional medicine practises—there is extensive research on ethnobotany (e.g., [269,270,271,272,273,274])—and modern biochemical research. Capsaicin is just one of the numerous phytochemicals, such as kaempferol (e.g., [6,13,14]), quercetin [4,5,9], curcumin [275,276,277,278], coumarin (e.g., [3,7,279]) and allicin (e.g., [8,12,280]), which have been under research for quite some time for their antimicrobial properties.
As presented in the paper, there is much evidence to suggest that a host of mechanisms exists offering promise that capsaicin, alone or in combination with other compounds, can be, albeit sometimes in high concentrations, effective in an antimicrobial role. As mentioned, most of the pathogens against which capsaicin has been tested, are not only dangerous, especially in immunocompromised hosts or in nosocomial settings, but exhibit an even increasing resistance to existing therapies.
It must be noted that capsaicin has a variety of proven health-related properties, namely analgesic, [281,282], antioxidant [283], anti-inflammatory [284,285], anti-cancer [286,287,288,289,290,291,292], cardio-protective [293], vasculomodulatory [294], and metabolic modulation [283,295,296] effects; more organ-specific effects have been also mentioned [297]. Apart from these actions, an extensive number of traditional applications of capsaicin have been reported from Central and South America [298,299] where the red chili peppers where first cultivated, and even India [300] and Eritrea [301]. Of particular note, the native chilli of India, ‘Bhoot Jolokia’ (Capsicum chinense Jacq.), is regarded as the hottest chilli in the world, and has a host of applications in Ayurveda, the traditional Indian medicine [302].
On another aspect, repeated administration of capsaicin was proved by numerous researchers to inhibit the production and/or action of substance P [38,282,303,304,305,306,307,308,309] at least when locally applied. This is important, because apart from the other actions of substance P [310,311,312,313], it is implicated in the negative effects of infection-associated inflammation in animal models [314,315] and in teeth [316]; a recent review, also examined the association between the defensive capacity of the respiratory system and substance P in the context of the COVID-19 infection [317]. Therefore, in theory, for a patient suffering from a pathogen susceptible to capsaicin, the compound could exert a dual action, both a direct inhibition of the pathogen and a lessening of the associated inflammation.
We would also like to note that capsaicin-sensitive neurons can release somatostatin [285,318] and it is already well known that somatostatin promotes anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects [319,320,321]; recently, capsaicin was shown to be able to induce the release of somatostatin from such nerve endings when applied in transdermal patches [322]. Somatostatin is also important in its immunomodulatory role in cases of infection-induced inflammation; despite some positive effects, the secretion of somatostatin seems to downregulate the immune system [323,324,325,326]. Therefore, we could hypothesise that a capsaicin-derived antimicrobial drug could, at least in sufficient concentration, both act directly against the pathogen itself and also modulate the immune response by promoting somatostatin activity. However, another aspect we should consider here is that somatostatin and its analogues are evaluated as anticancer agents [327,328,329,330,331,332] and this can have implications in the case of viral-induced cancers [333,334,335,336].
Another important aspect related to the antimicrobial properties of capsaicin are its applications in neuropathy. Peripheral neuropathy may arise due to various causes such as type 2 diabetes, metabolic disorders or due to a considerable number of infectious agents as discussed by Brizzi et al. [337] and De León et al. [338]. On the other hand, a number of antimicrobial agents may also cause peripheral neuropathy themselves [338]; as such it is important to consider the potential applications as an alternative in the treatment of infections where the antimicrobials have this particular complication. Furthermore, capsaicin can be used to treat neuropathic pain [339,340] and therefore we may propose that capsaicin preparations can be used to treat both infection-induced peripheral neuropathy and the original infection itself. The effectiveness of such a treatment regarding the neuropathy could be monitored by a number of blood tests as suggested by a recent study [341]. Metabolic and systemic imbalances may aggravate the condition and should be taken into consideration [342,343].
Nonetheless, some constraints must be mentioned at this point, regarding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacotoxicity of capsaicin. As a compound, it is liposoluble and can be consequently administered locally, orally, and systemically [344]. The gastrointestinal absorption of capsaicin varies from 50% to 90% via a passive mechanism [345]; its rapid metabolization yields a number of active metabolites [346,347]. The half-life of capsaicin differs based on its application, from 25 min in systemic administration [348] to about 24 h in local administration [349,350]. It has been proven that it is possible to prolong capsaicin release and thus effective half-life using a carbopol-based formulation [351] specifically for antimicrobial applications. The metabolic pathways of capsaicin, which are important from a pharmacological perspective have been the subject of extensive research [352,353,354]. The development could lead to various applications, including perioperative care of complicated surgical cases or long-term treatment of infections in areas where antibiotic permeation is reduced [355,356,357,358].
While capsaicin has current and potential clinical applications, its side effects, which can be severe depending on the dose and application site are not negligible; pulmonary [359,360], gastrointestinal [361,362], cardiovascular [363,364], and even CNS [365,366] adverse effects have been reported. The adverse effect of capsaicin when it comes into contact with the eyes are even more rapid and pronounced [367]. This is of even greater importance in patients with impaired judgment or vision deficit that may mistakenly apply or consume capsaicin outside of the recommended use [368,369,370]. Another possibility is the use of composite creams containing capsaicin, along with other materials like coconut oil, which preserve medicinal capsaicin properties, while having a lower cost [371], and perhaps less side effects; the beneficial synergistic effects of coconut oil and capsaicin have also been noted by Trbojević Ivić et al. [372]. The antimicrobial effects of coconut oil have already been studied by a number of researchers (e.g., [373,374,375,376,377]) and it has been proposed that it can be a realistic antibacterial solution, at least for local infections of mild-to-medium severity [378]; its combination with capsaicin may further enhance its potential.
The aforementioned data raise some serious issues, namely as to how capsaicin, in a medicinal formulation, can be used in an antimicrobial role, reaching, in the affected tissues, concentrations sufficient enough to be effective, but not as high as to cause unbearable or even life-threatening side effects. This issue is further compounded by the fact that capsaicin is toxic for children in lower doses compared to adults [379]; this is even more problematic when considering that typically, most pathogens are more dangerous for children than for immunocompetent adults. Finally, in potential overdose cases, there is no way to speed up the elimination of capsaicin. Rather, the only option is to treat the intoxication symptoms until it is excreted [380].
A possible answer to the limitations of systemic administration—local administration with patches, creams, and other methods being an easier matter—could be the use of nanoparticles to deliver capsaicin to its target tissues, in sufficient quantities. Nanoparticles are already considered as a potential effective carrier of antibiotics (e.g., [381,382,383]), while other nanoparticles themselves are being considered as theoretically useful antiviral agents [384,385,386]. The delivery of antifungal agents via nanoparticles is also possible [387,388,389], and lately nanoparticles are being considered in the research for antiparasitic drugs [390,391,392]. While most of this research deals with metal nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles are also a potential solution as discussed by Date et al. [393]. Another potential option for external applications could be the lipid nanoparticles used in wound care [394]. Successful applications of capsaicin-laden nanoparticles in vitro have also been included in our paper [171,205].
Overall, capsaicin’s use as an antibacterial agent covers a wide spectrum of pathogens; namely bacteria, both Gram positive and Gram negative, belonging to Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, Listeria, Vibrio, Acinetobacter, Helicobacter, Salmonella, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Proteus, and Pseudomonas species, in addition to fungal species like Candida and Aspergillus, as well as the parasites Toxopasma and Trypanosoma and the Influenza and Lassa viruses. This is important because most of the aforementioned microorganisms are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Moreover, the rising resistance noted in some strains alongside the side effects associated with the usual antimicrobial agents highlights the need for auxiliary treatments.

7. Conclusions

We conclude that capsaicin has a number of demonstrable antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic, and antiviral actions, and at least in its antibacterial role it is also considered as a promising perspective. Although significant research has been performed on this subject, more experiments are required in order to determine the effects of capsaicin on a wider host of pathogens and to elucidate whether there are any undiscovered mechanisms of action.
Experiments with the aim to determine the capsaicin-induced inflammation in the cases of infections with capsaicin-susceptible pathogens should also be performed, the end goal being the designing of dual-purpose drugs; those having both an antimicrobial and an anti-inflammatory potential. Indeed, in most of the cases examined in this paper, the antimicrobial concentrations are reasonably low, and even in cases when they are on the high end, capsaicin may still be useful due to a lack of resistance, especially in the case of bacteria.
An overview of the antimicrobial actions of capsaicin may contribute to multiple fields, including chemistry, medicine, homeopathy, traditional medicine, as well as other areas. This may further serve as a starting point to additional research, especially in this era marked by the increase in antimicrobial resistance.
Future research perspectives on this topic may include the closer examination of antimicrobial actions of capsaicin reported by traditional medicine as well as the exploration of more efficient nanoparticle carriers for antimicrobial capsaicin formulations. However, in any case, the most important research effort should be directed towards the applications of capsaicin against pathogens which are resistant to currently available medications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-T.P., A.P., C.S. and C.C.; resources, K.P., A.C., I.A.B. and I.S.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-T.P., A.P., K.P., A.C., I.A.B., I.S.-F., C.S. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, A.-T.P., A.P., C.S. and C.C.; supervision, C.S. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2021-2243, within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

References

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on 26 August 2023).
  2. Brinkac, L.; Voorhies, A.; Gomez, A.; Nelson, K.E. The Threat of Antimicrobial Resistance on the Human Microbiome. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 74, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ojala, T.; Remes, S.; Haansuu, P.; Vuorela, H.; Hiltunen, R.; Haahtela, K.; Vuorela, P. Antimicrobial activity of some coumarin containing herbal plants growing in Finland. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hirai, I.; Okuno, M.; Katsuma, R.; Arita, N.; Tachibana, M.; Yamamoto, Y. Characterisation of anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity of quercetin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1250–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Feng, J.; Lou, B.; Zhou, X.; Wu, H. Antibacterial activity of quercetin on oral infectious pathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 5358–5361. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tatsimo, S.J.N.; Tamokou, J.d.D.; Havyarimana, L.; Csupor, D.; Forgo, P.; Hohmann, J.; Kuiate, J.-R.; Tane, P. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of kaempferol rhamnoside derivatives from Bryophyllum pinnatum. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Al-Rifai, A.A.A.; Ayoub, M.T.; Shakya, A.K.; Abu Safieh, K.A.; Mubarak, M.S. Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of some new coumarin derivatives. Med. Chem. Res. 2012, 21, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wallock-Richards, D.; Doherty, C.J.; Doherty, L.; Clarke, D.J.; Place, M.; Govan, J.R.W.; Campopiano, D.J. Garlic Revisited: Antimicrobial Activity of Allicin-Containing Garlic Extracts against Burkholderia cepacia Complex. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jaisinghani, R.N. Antibacterial properties of quercetin. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 8, 6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Sotto, A.; Di Giacomo, S.; Amatore, D.; Locatelli, M.; Vitalone, A.; Toniolo, C.; Rotino, G.; Lo Scalzo, R.; Palamara, A.; Marcocci, M.E.; et al. A Polyphenol Rich Extract from Solanum melongena L. DR2 Peel Exhibits Antioxidant Properties and Anti-Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Activity In Vitro. Molecules 2018, 23, 2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Sotto, A.; Checconi, P.; Celestino, I.; Locatelli, M.; Carissimi, S.; De Angelis, M.; Rossi, V.; Limongi, D.; Toniolo, C.; Martinoli, L.; et al. Antiviral and Antioxidant Activity of a Hydroalcoholic Extract from Humulus lupulus L. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 5919237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nakamoto, M.; Kunimura, K.; Suzuki, J.I.; Kodera, Y. Antimicrobial properties of hydrophobic compounds in garlic: Allicin, vinyldithiin, ajoene and diallyl polysulfides (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 19, 1550–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Periferakis, A.; Periferakis, K.; Badarau, I.A.; Petran, E.M.; Popa, D.C.; Caruntu, A.; Costache, R.S.; Scheau, C.; Caruntu, C.; Costache, D.O. Kaempferol: Antimicrobial Properties, Sources, Clinical, and Traditional Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bangar, S.P.; Chaudhary, V.; Sharma, N.; Bansal, V.; Ozogul, F.; Lorenzo, J.M. Kaempferol: A flavonoid with wider biological activities and its applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vuković, S.; Popović-Djordjević, J.B.; Kostić, A.Ž.; Pantelić, N.D.; Srećković, N.; Akram, M.; Laila, U.; Katanić Stanković, J.S. Allium Species in the Balkan Region–Major Metabolites, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Valipour, M.; Hosseini, A.; Di Sotto, A.; Irannejad, H. Dual action anti-inflammatory/antiviral isoquinoline alkaloids as potent naturally occurring anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents: A combined pharmacological and medicinal chemistry perspective. Phytother. Res. 2023, 37, 2168–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cordell, G.A.; Araujo, O.E. Capsaicin: Identification, nomenclature, and pharmacotherapy. Ann. Pharmacother. 1993, 27, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Srinivasan, K. Biological Activities of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Its Pungent Principle Capsaicin: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1488–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Naves, E.R.; de Ávila Silva, L.; Sulpice, R.; Araújo, W.L.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Peres, L.E.P.; Zsögön, A. Capsaicinoids: Pungency beyond Capsicum. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gradinaru, T.C.; Petran, M.; Dragos, D.; Gilca, M. PlantMolecularTasteDB: A Database of Taste Active Phytochemicals. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 751712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alberti, A.; Galasso, V.; Kovac, B.; Modelli, A.; Pichierri, F. Probing the molecular and electronic structure of capsaicin: A spectroscopic and quantum mechanical study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 5700–5711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reyes-Escogido Mde, L.; Gonzalez-Mondragon, E.G.; Vazquez-Tzompantzi, E. Chemical and pharmacological aspects of capsaicin. Molecules 2011, 16, 1253–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bennett, D.J.; Kirby, G.W. Constitution and biosynthesis of capsaicin. J. Chem. Soc. C Org. 1968, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leete, E.; Louden, M.C.L. Biosynthesis of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in Capsicum frutescens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6837–6841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aza-González, C.; Núñez-Palenius, H.G.; Ochoa-Alejo, N. Molecular biology of capsaicinoid biosynthesis in chili pepper (Capsicum spp.). Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kaiser, M.; Higuera, I.; Goycoolea, F.M. Capsaicinoids: Occurrence, Chemistry, Biosynthesis, and Biological Effects. In Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Katsuragi, H.; Shimoda, K.; Yamamoto, R.; Ohara, T.; Hamada, H. Enzymatic synthesis of capsaicin 4-O-β-xylooligosaccharides by β-xylosidase from Aspergillus sp. Acta. Biol. Hung. 2011, 62, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cowles, R.S.; Keller, J.E.; Miller, J.R. Pungent spices, ground red pepper, and synthetic capsaicin as onion fly ovipositional deterrents. J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kimball, B.A.; Taylor, J.; Perry, K.R.; Capelli, C. Deer responses to repellent stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stock, B.; Haag-Wackernagel, D. Effectiveness of Gel Repellents on Feral Pigeons. Animals 2013, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, N.; Galves, C.; Racioni Goncalves, A.C.; Chen, J.; Fisk, I. Impact of capsaicin on aroma release: In vitro and in vivo analysis. Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, X.; Ayed, C.; Chen, J.; Fisk, I.; Yang, N. The role of capsaicin stimulation on the physicochemical properties of saliva and aroma release in model aqueous and oil systems. Food Chem. 2022, 386, 132824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maliszewska, J.; Wyszkowska, J.; Kletkiewicz, H.; Rogalska, J. Capsaicin-induced dysregulation of acid-base status in the American cockroach. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2019, 54, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cui, S.-F.; Wang, J.-W.; Li, H.-F.; Fang, R.; Yu, X.; Lu, Y.-J. Microencapsulation of Capsaicin in Chitosan Microcapsules: Characterization, Release Behavior, and Pesticidal Properties against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Insects 2023, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adaszek, Ł.; Gadomska, D.; Mazurek, Ł.; Łyp, P.; Madany, J.; Winiarczyk, S. Properties of capsaicin and its utility in veterinary and human medicine. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 123, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mohammad, S.; Mustofa Helmi, E.; Faisal, F.; Muhammad Thohawi Elziyad, P. Role of Capsaicin in the Repair of Cellular Activity in Mice Liver. Pharmacogn. J. 2021, 13, 1573–1576. [Google Scholar]
  37. Watson, P.N.C.; Evans, R.J. The postmastectomy pain syndrome and topical capsaicin: A randomized trial. Pain 1992, 51, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McCleane, G. The analgesic efficacy of topical capsaicin is enhanced by glyceryl trinitrate in painful osteoarthritis: A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Eur. J. Pain 2000, 4, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Grushka, M.; Epstein, J.B.; Gorsky, M. Burning mouth syndrome. Am. Fam. Physician 2002, 65, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Saguil, A.; Kane, S.; Mercado, M.; Lauters, R. Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic Neuralgia: Prevention and Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 96, 656–663. [Google Scholar]
  41. Breneman, D.L.; Cardone, J.S.; Blumsack, R.F.; Lather, R.M.; Searle, E.A.; Pollack, V.E. Topical capsaicin for treatment of hemodialysis-related pruritus. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1992, 26, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lysy, J.; Sistiery-Ittah, M.; Israelit, Y.; Shmueli, A.; Strauss-Liviatan, N.; Mindrul, V.; Keret, D.; Goldin, E. Topical capsaicin—A novel and effective treatment for idiopathic intractable pruritus ani: A randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study. Gut 2003, 52, 1323–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Makhlough, A.; Ala, S.; Haj-Heydari, Z.; Kashi, Z.; Bari, A. Topical capsaicin therapy for uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis. Iran J. Kidney Dis. 2010, 4, 137–140. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gooding, S.M.; Canter, P.H.; Coelho, H.F.; Boddy, K.; Ernst, E. Systematic review of topical capsaicin in the treatment of pruritus. Int. J. Dermatol. 2010, 49, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. de Sèze, M.; Wiart, L.; de Sèze, M.P.; Soyeur, L.; Dosque, J.P.; Blajezewski, S.; Moore, N.; Brochet, B.; Mazaux, J.M.; Barat, M.; et al. Intravesical capsaicin versus resiniferatoxin for the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J. Urol. 2004, 171, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cruz, F. Mechanisms involved in new therapies for overactive bladder. Urology 2004, 63, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Misra, M.N.; Pullani, A.J.; Mohamed, Z.U. Prevention of PONV by acustimulation with Capsicum plaster is comparable to ondansetron after middle ear surgery. Can. J. Anaesth 2005, 52, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Agarwal, A.; Dhiraaj, S.; Tandon, M.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, U.; Pawar, S. Evaluation of capsaicin ointment at the Korean hand acupressure point K-D2 for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 2005, 60, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hayman, M.; Kam, P.C.A. Capsaicin: A review of its pharmacology and clinical applications. Curr. Anaesth. Crit. Care 2008, 19, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Botonis, P.G.; Miliotis, P.G.; Kounalakis, S.N.; Koskolou, M.D.; Geladas, N.D. Effects of capsaicin application on the skin during resting exposure to temperate and warm conditions. Scand J. Med. Sci. Sports 2019, 29, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rothenberger, J.; Wittwer, M.; Tschumi, C.; Constantinescu, M.A.; Daigeler, A.; Olariu, R. Quantitative impact analysis of remote ischemic conditioning and capsaicin application on human skin microcirculation. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2019, 71, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Caruntu, C.; Negrei, C.; Ilie Ghita, M.; Caruntu, A.; Bădărău, A.I.; Ioan, B.; Boda, D.; Albu, A.; Brănişteanu, D. Capsaicin, a Hot Topic in Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. Inflammation 2015, 63, 487–491. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ilie Ghita, M.; Caruntu, C.; Tampa, M.; Georgescu, S.R.; Matei, C.; Negrei, C.; Ion, R.-M.; Constantin, C.; Neagu, M.; Boda, D. Capsaicin: Physicochemical properties, cutaneous reactions and potential applications in painful and inflammatory conditions (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 916–925. [Google Scholar]
  54. Căruntu, C.; Boda, D. Evaluation through in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of the cutaneous neurogenic inflammatory reaction induced by capsaicin in human subjects. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17, 085003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lakatos, S.; Jancsó, G.; Horváth, Á.; Dobos, I.; Sántha, P. Longitudinal Study of Functional Reinnervation of the Denervated Skin by Collateral Sprouting of Peptidergic Nociceptive Nerves Utilizing Laser Doppler Imaging. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wallace, R.J. Antimicrobial properties of plant secondary metabolites. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2004, 63, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Salehi, B.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Gyawali, R.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Rajkovic, J.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Khan, T.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Ozleyen, A.; Turkdonmez, E.; et al. Piper Species: A Comprehensive Review on Their Phytochemistry, Biological Activities and Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Makuwa, S.C.; Serepa-Dlamini, M.H. The Antibacterial Activity of Crude Extracts of Secondary Metabolites from Bacterial Endophytes Associated with Dicoma anomala. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021, 2021, 8812043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Aminah, N.S.; Laili, E.R.; Rafi, M.; Rochman, A.; Insanu, M.; Tun, K.N.W. Secondary metabolite compounds from Sida genus and their bioactivity. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jubair, N.; Rajagopal, M.; Chinnappan, S.; Abdullah, N.B.; Fatima, A. Review on the Antibacterial Mechanism of Plant-Derived Compounds against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria (MDR). Evid. Based Complement Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 3663315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bhatia, P.; Sharma, A.; George, A.J.; Anvitha, D.; Kumar, P.; Dwivedi, V.P.; Chandra, N.S. Antibacterial activity of medicinal plants against ESKAPE: An update. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Füchtbauer, S.; Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Antibacterial properties of capsaicin and its derivatives and their potential to fight antibiotic resistance—A literature survey. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2021, 11, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kitsos, N.; Cassimos, D.; Xinias, I.; Agakidis, C.; Mavroudi, A. Management of antibiotic allergy in children: A practical approach. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2022, 50, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Green, E.A.; Fogarty, K.; Ishmael, F.T. Penicillin Allergy: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management. Prim. Care 2023, 50, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wrynn, A.F. An overview of penicillin allergies for nurses. Nursing 2023, 53, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Westphal, J.; Vetter, D.; Brogard, J. Hepatic side-effects of antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1994, 33, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Thiim, M.; Friedman, L.S. Hepatotoxicity of antibiotics and antifungals. Clin. Liver Dis. 2003, 7, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Polson, J.E. Hepatotoxicity due to antibiotics. Clin. Liver Dis. 2007, 11, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Andrade, R.J.; Tulkens, P.M. Hepatic safety of antibiotics used in primary care. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Rehman, K.; Kamran, S.H.; Hamid Akash, M.S. Chapter 16—Toxicity of antibiotics. In Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the Environment; Hashmi, M.Z., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 234–252. [Google Scholar]
  71. Dorobăţ, O.-M.; Moisoiu, A.; Tălăpan, D. Bacteria isolated from pleural fluid and their resistance to antimicrobials. Pneumologia 2006, 55, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Dorobăţ, O.M.; Moisoiu, A.; Tălăpan, D. Incidence and resistance patterns of pathogens from lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Pneumologia 2007, 56, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  73. Dorobăţ, O.M.; Bădicuţ, I.; Tălăpan, D.; Tenea, C.; Rafila, A. Antibiotic resistance of Gram-positive cocci isolated in 2008. Bacteriol. Virusol. Parazitol. Epidemiol. 2010, 55, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  74. Popescu, G.A.; Șerban, R.; Iosif, I.; Codiță, I.; Dorobăț, O.; Tălăpan, D.; Buzea, M.; Szekely, E.; Dorneanu, O.; Bota, K.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance of germs isolated from invasive infections–Romania 2012. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, O16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rafila, A.; Talapan, D.; Dorobăţ, O.M.; Popescu, G.A.; Piţigoi, D.; Florea, D.; Buicu, F.C. Emergence of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, a Public Health Threat: A Romanian Infectious Disease Hospital Based Study/Emergenţa Enterobacteriaceaelor producătoare de carbapenemaze, o ameninţare pentru sănătatea publică: Un studiu realizat într-un spital romanesc de boli infectioase. Rev. Romana Med. Lab. 2015, 23, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kohler, P.P.; Melano, R.G.; Patel, S.N.; Shafinaz, S.; Faheem, A.; Coleman, B.L.; Green, K.; Armstrong, I.; Almohri, H.; Borgia, S.; et al. Emergence of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae, South-Central Ontario, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1674–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tălăpan, D.; Rafila, A. Five-Year Survey of Asymptomatic Colonization with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in a Romanian Tertiary Care Hospital. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 2959–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ackerman, S.; Gonzales, R. The context of antibiotic overuse. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012, 157, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shallcross, L.J.; Davies, D.S.C. Antibiotic overuse: A key driver of antimicrobial resistance. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2014, 64, 604–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Willis, L.D.; Chandler, C. Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality: Reframing the entrenched problem of antibiotic overuse. BMJ Glob. Health 2019, 4, e001590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kanellopoulos, C.; Lamprinou, V.; Politi, A.; Voudouris, P.; Iliopoulos, I.; Kokkaliari, M.; Moforis, L.; Economou-Amilli, A. Microbial Mat Stratification in Travertine Depositions of Greek Hot Springs and Biomineralization Processes. Minerals 2022, 12, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kanellopoulos, C.; Lamprinou, V.; Politi, A.; Voudouris, P.; Iliopoulos, I.; Kokkaliari, M.; Moforis, L.; Economou-Amilli, A. Speleothems and Biomineralization Processes in Hot Spring Environment: The Case of Aedipsos (Edipsos), Euboea (Evia) Island, Greece. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kanellopoulos, C.; Lamprinou, V.; Politi, A.; Voudouris, P.; Economou-Amilli, A. Pioneer species of Cyanobacteria in hot springs and their role to travertine formation: The case of Aedipsos hot springs, Euboea (Evia), Greece. Depos. Rec. 2022, 8, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. EUCAST. Definitive Document Methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Terminology. Clin Microbiol Infect 1998, 4, 291. [Google Scholar]
  85. Nascimento, P.L.; Nascimento, T.C.; Ramos, N.S.; Silva, G.R.; Gomes, J.E.; Falcão, R.E.; Moreira, K.A.; Porto, A.L.; Silva, T.M. Quantification, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of phenolics isolated from different extracts of Capsicum frutescens (Pimenta Malagueta). Molecules 2014, 19, 5434–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Das, J.; Deka, M.; Gogoi, K. Antimicrobial activity of chilli extracts (Capsicum chinense) against food borne pathogens Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 2018, 5, 717–720. [Google Scholar]
  87. Marini, E.; Magi, G.; Mingoia, M.; Pugnaloni, A.; Facinelli, B. Antimicrobial and Anti-Virulence Activity of Capsaicin against Erythromycin-Resistant, Cell-Invasive Group A Streptococci. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Omolo, M.A.; Wong, Z.-Z.; Borh, W.G.; Hedblom, G.A.; Dev, K.; Baumler, D.J. Comparative analysis of capsaicin in twenty nine varieties of unexplored Capsicum and its antimicrobial activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens. J. Med. Plants Res. 2018, 12, 544–556. [Google Scholar]
  89. Chatterjee, S.; Asakura, M.; Chowdhury, N.; Neogi, S.B.; Sugimoto, N.; Haldar, S.; Awasthi, S.P.; Hinenoya, A.; Aoki, S.; Yamasaki, S. Capsaicin, a potential inhibitor of cholera toxin production in Vibrio cholerae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 2010, 306, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ozçelik, B.; Kartal, M.; Orhan, I. Cytotoxicity, antiviral and antimicrobial activities of alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolic acids. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zeyrek, F.Y.; Oguz, E. In vitro activity of capsaicin against Helicobacter pylori. Ann. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 125–127. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ayariga, J.A.; Abugri, D.A.; Amrutha, B.; Villafane, R. Capsaicin Potently Blocks Salmonella typhimurium Invasion of Vero Cells. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kushwaha, M.; Jain, S.K.; Sharma, N.; Abrol, V.; Jaglan, S.; Vishwakarma, R.A. Establishment of LCMS Based Platform for Discovery of Quorum Sensing Inhibitors: Signal Detection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ahmad-Mansour, N.; Loubet, P.; Pouget, C.; Dunyach-Remy, C.; Sotto, A.; Lavigne, J.P.; Molle, V. Staphylococcus aureus Toxins: An Update on Their Pathogenic Properties and Potential Treatments. Toxins 2021, 13, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Leung, A.K.C.; Barankin, B.; Leong, K.F. Staphylococcal-scalded skin syndrome: Evaluation, diagnosis, and management. World J. Pediatr. 2018, 14, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Lowy, F.D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Tong, S.Y.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G., Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 603–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Stevens, D.L. The toxins of group A streptococcus, the flesh eating bacteria. Immunol. Investig. 1997, 26, 129–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Malachowa, N.; DeLeo, F.R. Mobile genetic elements of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 3057–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Howden, B.P.; Davies, J.K.; Johnson, P.D.; Stinear, T.P.; Grayson, M.L. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: Resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 99–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Grema, H.A.; Geidam, Y.A.; Gadzama, G.B.; Ameh, J.A.; Suleiman, A. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): A review. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015, 3, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Akyuz, L.; Kaya, M.; Mujtaba, M.; Ilk, S.; Sargin, I.; Salaberria, A.M.; Labidi, J.; Cakmak, Y.S.; Islek, C. Supplementing capsaicin with chitosan-based films enhanced the anti-quorum sensing, antimicrobial, antioxidant, transparency, elasticity and hydrophobicity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Qiu, J.; Niu, X.; Wang, J.; Xing, Y.; Leng, B.; Dong, J.; Li, H.; Luo, M.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, X. Capsaicin protects mice from community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cunningham, M.W. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 470–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jespersen, M.G.; Lacey, J.A.; Tong, S.Y.C.; Davies, M.R. Global genomic epidemiology of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 86, 104609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lynskey, N.N.; Lawrenson, R.A.; Sriskandan, S. New understandings in Streptococcus pyogenes. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 24, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. González-Abad, M.J.; Alonso Sanz, M. Infecciones invasoras por Streptococcus pyogenes (2011–2018): Serotipos y presentación clínica. An. Pediatría 2020, 92, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sriskandan, S.; Faulkner, L.; Hopkins, P. Streptococcus pyogenes: Insight into the function of the streptococcal superantigens. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Alouf, J.E. Streptococcal toxins (streptolysin O, streptolysin S, erythrogenic toxin). Pharmacol. Ther. 1980, 11, 661–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Noskin, G.A.; Peterson, L.R.; Warren, J.R. Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia: Acquisition and outcome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1995, 20, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Schaberg, D.R.; Culver, D.H.; Gaynes, R.P. Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection. Am. J. Med. 1991, 91, S72–S75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kaye, D. Enterococci: Biologic and epidemiologic characteristics and in vitro susceptibility. Arch. Intern. Med. 1982, 142, 2006–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Maki, D.G.; Agger, W.A. Enterococcal Bacteremia: Clinical Features, the Risk of Endocarditis, and Management. Medicine 1988, 67, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Cetinkaya, Y.; Falk, P.; Mayhall, C.G. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 686–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Flagan, S.F.; Leadbetter, J.R. Utilization of capsaicin and vanillylamine as growth substrates by Capsicum (hot pepper)-associated bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Gu, H.J.; Sun, Q.L.; Luo, J.C.; Zhang, J.; Sun, L. A First Study of the Virulence Potential of a Bacillus subtilis Isolate from Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Brown, K.L. Control of bacterial spores. Br. Med. Bull. 2000, 56, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Cote, C.K.; Heffron, J.D.; Bozue, J.A.; Welkos, S.L. Chapter 102—Bacillus anthracis and Other Bacillus Species. In Molecular Medical Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Tang, Y.-W., Sussman, M., Liu, D., Poxton, I., Schwartzman, J., Eds.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 1789–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Spencer, R.C.  Bacillus anthracis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2003, 56, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Molina-Torres, J.; García-Chávez, A.; Ramírez-Chávez, E. Antimicrobial properties of alkamides present in flavouring plants traditionally used in Mesoamerica: Affinin and capsaicin. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 64, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Argôlo-Filho, R.C.; Loguercio, L.L. Bacillus thuringiensis Is an Environmental Pathogen and Host-Specificity Has Developed as an Adaptation to Human-Generated Ecological Niches. Insects 2013, 5, 62–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Farber, J.M.; Peterkin, P.I. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol. Rev. 1991, 55, 476–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Schwarzkopf, A. Listeria monocytogenes–aspects of pathogenicity. Pathol. Biol. 1996, 44, 769–774. [Google Scholar]
  124. Disson, O.; Moura, A.; Lecuit, M. Making Sense of the Biodiversity and Virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Colwell, R.R.; Kaper, J.; Joseph, S.W. Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and other vibrios: Occurrence and distribution in Chesapeake Bay. Science 1977, 198, 394–396. [Google Scholar]
  126. Garay, E.; Arnau, A.; Amaro, C. Incidence of Vibrio cholerae and related vibrios in a coastal lagoon and seawater influenced by lake discharges along an annual cycle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Reidl, J.; Klose, K.E. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Out of the water and into the host. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Glass, R.I.; Huq, I.; Alim, A.R.; Yunus, M. Emergence of multiply antibiotic-resistant Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dis. 1980, 142, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Das, B.; Verma, J.; Kumar, P.; Ghosh, A.; Ramamurthy, T. Antibiotic resistance in Vibrio cholerae: Understanding the ecology of resistance genes and mechanisms. Vaccine 2020, 38 (Suppl. S1), A83–A92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Alam, M.; Islam, M.T.; Rashed, S.M.; Johura, F.T.; Bhuiyan, N.A.; Delgado, G.; Morales, R.; Mendez, J.L.; Navarro, A.; Watanabe, H.; et al. Vibrio cholerae classical biotype strains reveal distinct signatures in Mexico. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2212–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Asif, M.; Alvi, I.A.; Rehman, S.U. Insight into Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, global resistance, mechanisms of resistance, treatment options, and alternative modalities. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018, 11, 1249–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Pourhajibagher, M.; Hashemi, F.B.; Pourakbari, B.; Aziemzadeh, M.; Bahador, A. Antimicrobial Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii to Imipenem in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open Microbiol. J. 2016, 10, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Qi, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Liang, B.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Du, X.; Liu, X.; Qiu, S.; Song, H. Relationship between Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation, and Biofilm-Specific Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gheorghe-Barbu, I.; Barbu, I.C.; Popa, L.I.; Pîrcălăbioru, G.G.; Popa, M.; Măruțescu, L.; Niță-Lazar, M.; Banciu, A.; Stoica, C.; Gheorghe, Ș.; et al. Temporo-spatial variations in resistance determinants and clonality of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from Romanian hospitals and wastewaters. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2022, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Guo, T.; Li, M.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Jiao, H.; Li, G. Synergistic Activity of Capsaicin and Colistin against Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: In Vitro/Vivo Efficacy and Mode of Action. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 744494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Mégraud, F. Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics and its impact on treatment options. Drug Resist. Updat. 2001, 4, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Dascălu, R.; Bolocan, A.; Păduaru, D.; Constantinescu, A.; Mitache, M.; Stoica, A.; Andronic, O. Multidrug resistance in Helicobacter pylori infection. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1128497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Jones, N.L.; Shabib, S.; Sherman, P.M. Capsaicin as an inhibitor of the growth of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 146, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Saha, K.; Sarkar, D.; Khan, U.; Karmakar, B.C.; Paul, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Dutta, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Capsaicin Inhibits Inflammation and Gastric Damage during H pylori Infection by Targeting NF-kB-miRNA Axis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Venier, N.A.; Colquhoun, A.J.; Sasaki, H.; Kiss, A.; Sugar, L.; Adomat, H.; Fleshner, N.E.; Klotz, L.H.; Venkateswaran, V. Capsaicin: A novel radio-sensitizing agent for prostate cancer. Prostate 2015, 75, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Crump, J.A.; Luby, S.P.; Mintz, E.D. The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull. World Health Organ. 2004, 82, 346–353. [Google Scholar]
  142. Popa, G.L.; Papa, M.I. Salmonella spp. infection—A continuous threat worldwide. Germs 2021, 11, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Allerberger, F.; Liesegang, A.; Grif, K.; Khaschabi, D.; Prager, R.; Danzl, J.; Höck, F.; Ottl, J.; Dierich, M.P.; Berghold, C.; et al. Occurrence of Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin in Austria. Wien Med. Wochenschr. 2003, 153, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Elias, A.; Viana, J.X.; Rangel, H.; Osles, A.G. Antigenic variation in Salmonella typhimurium. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1974, 145, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Martin, L.J.; Fyfe, M.; Doré, K.; Buxton, J.A.; Pollari, F.; Henry, B.; Middleton, D.; Ahmed, R.; Jamieson, F.; Ciebin, B.; et al. Increased Burden of Illness Associated with Antimicrobial-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Hussain, A.; Satti, L.; Hanif, F.; Zehra, N.M.; Nadeem, S.; Bangash, T.M.; Peter, A. Typhoidal Salmonella strains in Pakistan: An impending threat of extensively drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 2145–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Butaye, P.; Michael, G.B.; Schwarz, S.; Barrett, T.J.; Brisabois, A.; White, D.G. The clonal spread of multidrug-resistant non-typhi Salmonella serotypes. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 1891–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Chiu, C.H.; Wu, T.L.; Su, L.H.; Chu, C.; Chia, J.H.; Kuo, A.J.; Chien, M.S.; Lin, T.Y. The emergence in Taiwan of fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype choleraesuis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kaper, J.B.; Nataro, J.P.; Mobley, H.L. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gomes, T.A.; Elias, W.P.; Scaletsky, I.C.; Guth, B.E.; Rodrigues, J.F.; Piazza, R.M.; Ferreira, L.C.; Martinez, M.B. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47 (Suppl. S1), 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Cerceo, E.; Deitelzweig, S.B.; Sherman, B.M.; Amin, A.N. Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Hospital Setting: Overview, Implications for Clinical Practice, and Emerging Treatment Options. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 412–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Ye, L.; Luo, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Cui, Z.; Han, L. Characterization of clinical multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 2007–2009, China. Microb. Drug Resist. 2012, 18, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Navon-Venezia, S.; Kondratyeva, K.; Carattoli, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: A major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 252–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Effah, C.Y.; Sun, T.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y. Klebsiella pneumoniae: An increasing threat to public health. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2020, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Podschun, R.; Ullmann, U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 589–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Surleac, M.; Czobor Barbu, I.; Paraschiv, S.; Popa, L.I.; Gheorghe, I.; Marutescu, L.; Popa, M.; Sarbu, I.; Talapan, D.; Nita, M.; et al. Whole genome sequencing snapshot of multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from hospitals and receiving wastewater treatment plants in Southern Romania. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Hassan, M.G.; Abdulrazik, G.; El Awady, M.E.; Hamed, A.A.; Abdel-Monem, M.O. Antimicrobial Activity of Capsaicin and Its Derivatives against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. G. Microbiol. 2021, 13, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Al-Musawi, S.; Albukhaty, S.; Al-Karagoly, H.; Sulaiman, G.M.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Dewir, Y.H.; Soliman, D.A.; Rizwana, H. Antibacterial Activity of Honey/Chitosan Nanofibers Loaded with Capsaicin and Gold Nanoparticles for Wound Dressing. Molecules 2020, 25, 4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Papazafiropoulou, A.; Daniil, I.; Sotiropoulos, A.; Balampani, E.; Kokolaki, A.; Bousboulas, S.; Konstantopoulou, S.; Skliros, E.; Petropoulou, D.; Pappas, S. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in type 2 diabetic subjects with and without microalbuminuria. BMC Res. Notes 2010, 3, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Matthews, S.J.; Lancaster, J.W. Urinary tract infections in the elderly population. Am. J. Geriatr. Pharmacother. 2011, 9, 286–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Rodriguez-Mañas, L. Urinary tract infections in the elderly: A review of disease characteristics and current treatment options. Drugs Context 2020, 9, 2020-4-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Schaffer, J.N.; Pearson, M.M. Proteus mirabilis and Urinary Tract Infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Mobley, H.L.; Warren, J.W. Urease-positive bacteriuria and obstruction of long-term urinary catheters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1987, 25, 2216–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mulvey, M.A.; Klumpp, D.J.; Stapleton, A.E. Urinary Tract Infections: Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Management; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  165. Hall, R.M.; Collis, C.M. Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria: The role of gene cassettes and integrons. Drug Resist. Updat. 1998, 1, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tumbarello, M.; Trecarichi, E.M.; Fiori, B.; Losito, A.R.; D’Inzeo, T.; Campana, L.; Ruggeri, A.; Di Meco, E.; Liberto, E.; Fadda, G.; et al. Multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis bloodstream infections: Risk factors and outcomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3224–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Pagani, L.; Migliavacca, R.; Pallecchi, L.; Matti, C.; Giacobone, E.; Amicosante, G.; Romero, E.; Rossolini, G.M. Emerging extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Proteus mirabilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 1549–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Endimiani, A.; Luzzaro, F.; Brigante, G.; Perilli, M.; Lombardi, G.; Amicosante, G.; Rossolini, G.M.; Toniolo, A. Proteus mirabilis bloodstream infections: Risk factors and treatment outcome related to the expression of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2598–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Cohen-Nahum, K.; Saidel-Odes, L.; Riesenberg, K.; Schlaeffer, F.; Borer, A. Urinary tract infections caused by multi-drug resistant Proteus mirabilis: Risk factors and clinical outcomes. Infection 2010, 38, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. D’Andrea, M.M.; Literacka, E.; Zioga, A.; Giani, T.; Baraniak, A.; Fiett, J.; Sadowy, E.; Tassios, P.T.; Rossolini, G.M.; Gniadkowski, M.; et al. Evolution and spread of a multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis clone with chromosomal AmpC-type cephalosporinases in Europe. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Charkhian, H.; Bodaqlouie, A.; Soleimannezhadbari, E.; Lotfollahi, L.; Shaykh-Baygloo, N.; Hosseinzadeh, R.; Yousefi, N.; Khodayar, M. Comparing the Bacteriostatic Effects of Different Metal Nanoparticles against Proteus vulgaris. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2674–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Klockgether, J.; Tümmler, B. Recent advances in understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a pathogen. F1000Res 2017, 6, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Buhl, M.; Peter, S.; Willmann, M. Prevalence and risk factors associated with colonization and infection of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A systematic review. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2015, 13, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Murphy, T.F. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2009, 15, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, C.F.; Silva, A.R.; Burth, P.; Rocco, P.R.; Castro-Faria, M.V.; Castro-Faria-Neto, H.C. Possible mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-associated lung disease. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 306, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Talwalkar, J.S.; Murray, T.S. The Approach to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis. Clin. Chest Med. 2016, 37, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Hancock, R.E. Resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998, 27 (Suppl. S1), S93–S99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Pang, Z.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Lin, T.J.; Cheng, Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Levitz, S.M. Tackling Human Fungal Infections. Science 2012, 336, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Rodriguez-Tudela, J.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Gago, S.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; León, C.; Miro, J.; Boluda, A.N.; Camps, I.R.; Sole, A.; Denning, D. Burden of serious fungal infections in Spain. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Alvarez-Moreno, C.A.; Cortes, J.A.; Denning, D.W. Burden of fungal infections in Colombia. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Tufa, T.B.; Denning, D.W. The Burden of Fungal Infections in Ethiopia. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Fisher, M.C.; Hawkins, N.J.; Sanglard, D.; Gurr, S.J. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science 2018, 360, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Revie, N.M.; Iyer, K.R.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: Evolution, mechanisms and impact. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 45, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Ben-Ami, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Resistance to antifungal drugs. Infect. Dis. Clin. 2021, 35, 279–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Elewski, B.E. Mechanisms of action of systemic antifungal agents. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1993, 28, S28–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Dixon, D.M.; Walsh, T.J. Antifungal agents. In Medical Microbiology, 4th ed.; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: Galveston, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  188. Gupta, A.K.; Tomas, E. New antifungal agents. Dermatol. Clin. 2003, 21, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Menezes, R.P.; Bessa, M.A.S.; Siqueira, C.P.; Teixeira, S.C.; Ferro, E.A.V.; Martins, M.M.; Cunha, L.C.S.; Martins, C.H.G. Antimicrobial, Antivirulence, and Antiparasitic Potential of Capsicum chinense Jacq. Extracts and Their Isolated Compound Capsaicin. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Buitimea-Cantúa, G.V.; Buitimea-Cantúa, N.E.; Rocha-Pizaña, M.d.R.; Hernández-Morales, A.; Magaña-Barajas, E.; Molina-Torres, J. Inhibitory effect of Capsicum chinense and Piper nigrum fruits, capsaicin and piperine on aflatoxins production in Aspergillus parasiticus by downregulating the expression of afl D, afl M, afl R, and afl S genes of aflatoxins biosynthetic pathway. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2020, 55, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Buitimea-Cantúa, G.V.; Velez-Haro, J.M.; Buitimea-Cantúa, N.E.; Molina-Torres, J.; Rosas-Burgos, E.C. GC-EIMS analysis, antifungal and anti-aflatoxigenic activity of Capsicum chinense and Piper nigrum fruits and their bioactive compounds capsaicin and piperine upon Aspergillus parasiticus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 1452–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Millsop, J.W.; Fazel, N. Oral candidiasis. Clin. Dermatol. 2016, 34, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hurley, R.; De Louvois, J. Candida vaginitis. Postgrad. Med. J. 1979, 55, 645–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Sobel, J.D. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet 2007, 369, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mayer, F.L.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence 2013, 4, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Fidel, P.L., Jr. History and new insights into host defense against vaginal candidiasis. Trends Microbiol. 2004, 12, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.; Benjamin, D.K., Jr.; Calandra, T.F.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Filler, S.G.; Fisher, J.F.; Kullberg, B.-J.; Zeichner, L.O.; et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management Candidiasis: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 503–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: A persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 133–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J. Epidemiology of invasive mycoses in North America. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 36, 1–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Behbehani, J.M.; Irshad, M.; Shreaz, S.; Karched, M. Anticandidal Activity of Capsaicin and Its Effect on Ergosterol Biosynthesis and Membrane Integrity of Candida albicans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Georgianna, D.R.; Payne, G.A. Genetic regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis: From gene to genome. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Astoreca, A.; Vaamonde, G.; Dalcero, A.; Ramos, A.J.; Marín, S. Modelling the effect of temperature and water activity of Aspergillus flavus isolates from corn. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 156, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Nikolić, M.; Savić, I.; Nikolić, A.; Jauković, M.; Kandić, V.; Stevanović, M.; Stanković, S. Toxigenic species Aspergillus parasiticus originating from Maize Kernels grown in Serbia. Toxins 2021, 13, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Sebők, F.; Dobolyi, C.; Zágoni, D.; Risa, A.; Krifaton, C.; Hartman, M.; Cserháti, M.; Szoboszlay, S.; Kriszt, B. Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus strains in Hungarian maize fields. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2016, 63, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Hernández-Téllez, C.N.; Luque-Alcaraz, A.G.; Núñez-Mexía, S.A.; Cortez-Rocha, M.O.; Lizardi-Mendoza, J.; Rosas-Burgos, E.C.; Rosas-Durazo, A.J.; Parra-Vergara, N.V.; Plascencia-Jatomea, M. Relationship between the Antifungal Activity of Chitosan-Capsaicin Nanoparticles and the Oxidative Stress Response on Aspergillus parasiticus. Polymers 2022, 14, 2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Milder, J.E.; Walzer, P.D.; Kilgore, G.; Rutherford, I.; Klein, M. Clinical features of Strongyloides stercoralis infection in an endemic area of the United States. Gastroenterology 1981, 80, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Marsh, K.; Snow, R.W. Host—Parasite interaction and morbidity in malaria endemic areas. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1997, 352, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Barry, M.A.; Weatherhead, J.E.; Hotez, P.J.; Woc-Colburn, L. Childhood parasitic infections endemic to the United States. Pediatr. Clin. 2013, 60, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Mata, L. Sociocultural Factors in the Control and Prevention of Parasitic Diseases. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1982, 4, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Fèvre, E.M.; Bronsvoort, B.M.d.C.; Hamilton, K.A.; Cleaveland, S. Animal movements and the spread of infectious diseases. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Torgerson, P.R. One world health: Socioeconomic burden and parasitic disease control priorities. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 195, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Torgerson, P.R.; de Silva, N.R.; Fèvre, E.M.; Kasuga, F.; Rokni, M.B.; Zhou, X.-N.; Sripa, B.; Gargouri, N.; Willingham, A.L.; Stein, C. The global burden of foodborne parasitic diseases: An update. Trends Parasitol. 2014, 30, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Pisarski, K. The global burden of disease of zoonotic parasitic diseases: Top 5 contenders for priority consideration. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Sangster, N.; Batterham, P.; Chapman, H.D.; Duraisingh, M.; Le Jambre, L.; Shirley, M.; Upcroft, J.; Upcroft, P. Resistance to antiparasitic drugs: The role of molecular diagnosis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 637–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Geary, T.G.; Thompson, D.P. Development of antiparasitic drugs in the 21st century. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 115, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Periferakis, A.; Caruntu, A.; Periferakis, A.-T.; Scheau, A.-E.; Badarau, I.A.; Caruntu, C.; Scheau, C. Availability, Toxicology and Medical Significance of Antimony. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Valera-Vera, E.A.; Reigada, C.; Sayé, M.; Digirolamo, F.A.; Galceran, F.; Miranda, M.R.; Pereira, C.A. Effect of capsaicin on the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2020, 367, fnaa194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Lourido, S.  Toxoplasma gondii. Trends Parasitol. 2019, 35, 944–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Zhang, Y.; Lai, B.S.; Juhas, M.; Zhang, Y. Toxoplasma gondii secretory proteins and their role in invasion and pathogenesis. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 227, 126293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Lima, T.S.; Lodoen, M.B. Mechanisms of human innate immune evasion by Toxoplasma gondii. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Dubey, J.P.; Lindsay, D.S.; Speer, C.A. Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Konstantinovic, N.; Guegan, H.; Stäjner, T.; Belaz, S.; Robert-Gangneux, F. Treatment of toxoplasmosis: Current options and future perspectives. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Dardé, M.L.; Villena, I.; Pinon, J.M.; Beguinot, I. Severe toxoplasmosis caused by a Toxoplasma gondii strain with a new isoenzyme type acquired in French Guyana. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Silva, L.A.; Reis-Cunha, J.L.; Bartholomeu, D.C.; Vítor, R.W. Genetic Polymorphisms and Phenotypic Profiles of Sulfadiazine-Resistant and Sensitive Toxoplasma gondii Isolates Obtained from Newborns with Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Minas Gerais, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Simarro, P.P.; Cecchi, G.; Paone, M.; Franco, J.R.; Diarra, A.; Ruiz, J.A.; Fèvre, E.M.; Courtin, F.; Mattioli, R.C.; Jannin, J.G. The Atlas of human African trypanosomiasis: A contribution to global mapping of neglected tropical diseases. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2010, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Desquesnes, M.; Dia, M.L. Trypanosoma vivax: Mechanical transmission in cattle by one of the most common African tabanids, Atylotus agrestis. Exp. Parasitol. 2003, 103, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Desquesnes, M.; Dia, M.L. Mechanical transmission of Trypanosoma congolense in cattle by the African tabanid Atylotus agrestis. Exp. Parasitol. 2003, 105, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Bouteille, B.; Oukem, O.; Bisser, S.; Dumas, M. Treatment perspectives for human African trypanosomiasis. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2003, 17, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Baker, N.; de Koning, H.P.; Mäser, P.; Horn, D. Drug resistance in African trypanosomiasis: The melarsoprol and pentamidine story. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Lavanchy, D. Hepatitis B virus epidemiology, disease burden, treatment, and current and emerging prevention and control measures. J. Viral Hepat. 2004, 11, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Ly, K.N.; Xing, J.; Klevens, R.M.; Jiles, R.B.; Ward, J.W.; Holmberg, S.D. The increasing burden of mortality from viral hepatitis in the United States between 1999 and 2007. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012, 156, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Kirk, M.D.; Pires, S.M.; Black, R.E.; Caipo, M.; Crump, J.A.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Döpfer, D.; Fazil, A.; Fischer-Walker, C.L.; Hald, T. World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: A data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001921. [Google Scholar]
  233. Savic, M.; Penders, Y.; Shi, T.; Branche, A.; Pirçon, J.Y. Respiratory syncytial virus disease burden in adults aged 60 years and older in high-income countries: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2023, 17, e13031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Manolescu, L.; Marinescu, P.; Sultana, C.; Temereanca, A.; Vagu, C.; Grancea, C.; Ruta, S. HIV lamivudine resistance mutations in HBV co-infected Romanian patients. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2008, 11, P182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Temereanca, A.; Ene, L.; Sultana, C.; Manolescu, L.; Duiculescu, D.; Ruta, S. Transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in untreated Romanian patients. In Proceedings of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2011 Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 20–23 October 2011. [Google Scholar]
  236. Sultana, C.; Oprisan, G.; Szmal, C.; Vagu, C.; Temereanca, A.; Dinu, S.; Teleman, M.D.; Ruta, S. Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus strains from Romania. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2011, 20, 261–266. [Google Scholar]
  237. Lefeuvre, P.; Moriones, E. Recombination as a motor of host switches and virus emergence: Geminiviruses as case studies. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 10, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Bo, Z.; Miao, Y.; Xi, R.; Gao, X.; Miao, D.; Chen, H.; Jung, Y.S.; Qian, Y.; Dai, J. Emergence of a novel pathogenic recombinant virus from Bartha vaccine and variant pseudorabies virus in China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 1454–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Sultana, C.; Casian, M.; Oprea, C.; Ianache, I.; Grancea, C.; Chiriac, D.; Ruta, S. Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes and Antiviral Resistance Mutations in Romanian HIV-HBV Co-Infected Patients. Medicina 2022, 58, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Grossarth-Maticek, R.; Frentzel-Beyme, R.; Kanazir, D.; Jankovic, M.; Vetter, H. Reported herpes-virus-infection, fever and cancer incidence in a prospective study. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Parkin, D.M.; Bray, F. The burden of HPV-related cancers. Vaccine 2006, 24, S11–S25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Sultana, C.; Oprişan, G.; Teleman, M.D.; Dinu, S.; Oprea, C.; Voiculescu, M.; Ruta, S.; Team, H.P. Impact of hepatitis C virus core mutations on the response to interferon-based treatment in chronic hepatitis C. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Goncalves, P.H.; Ziegelbauer, J.; Uldrick, T.S.; Yarchoan, R. Kaposi-sarcoma herpesvirus associated cancers and related diseases. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2017, 12, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Sultana, C.; Rosca, A.; Ruta, S. Correlation Between miR-125b Expression and Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C. Hepat. Mon. 2019, 19, e84615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Szymonowicz, K.A.; Chen, J. Biological and clinical aspects of HPV-related cancers. Cancer Biol. Med. 2020, 17, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Pavel, B.; Moroti, R.; Spataru, A.; Popescu, M.R.; Panaitescu, A.M.; Zagrean, A.-M. Neurological Manifestations of SARS-CoV2 Infection: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Fertig, T.E.; Chitoiu, L.; Terinte-Balcan, G.; Peteu, V.-E.; Marta, D.; Gherghiceanu, M. The atomic portrait of SARS-CoV-2 as captured by cryo-electron microscopy. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2022, 26, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Brauburger, K.; Hume, A.J.; Mühlberger, E.; Olejnik, J. Forty-five years of Marburg virus research. Viruses 2012, 4, 1878–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Messaoudi, I.; Amarasinghe, G.K.; Basler, C.F. Filovirus pathogenesis and immune evasion: Insights from Ebola virus and Marburg virus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Malvy, D.; McElroy, A.K.; de Clerck, H.; Günther, S.; van Griensven, J. Ebola virus disease. Lancet 2019, 393, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Jacob, S.T.; Crozier, I.; Fischer, W.A.; Hewlett, A.; Kraft, C.S.; Vega, M.-A.d.L.; Soka, M.J.; Wahl, V.; Griffiths, A.; Bollinger, L. Ebola virus disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Brunker, K.; Mollentze, N. Rabies virus. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 886–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Wunner, W.H.; Conzelmann, K.-K. Rabies virus. In Rabies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 43–81. [Google Scholar]
  254. Sedighpour, D.; Taghizadeh, H. The effects of mutation on the drug binding affinity of Neuraminidase: Case study of Capsaicin using steered molecular dynamics simulation. J. Mol. Model. 2022, 28, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Tang, K.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y. Identification of the dietary supplement capsaicin as an inhibitor of Lassa virus entry. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Labella, A.M.; Merel, S.E. Influenza. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 97, 621–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Webster, R.G.; Govorkova, E.A. Continuing challenges in influenza. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1323, 115–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Gaitonde, D.Y.; Moore, F.C.; Morgan, M.K. Influenza: Diagnosis and treatment. Am. Fam. Physician 2019, 100, 751–758. [Google Scholar]
  259. Wu, N.C.; Wilson, I.A. Influenza Hemagglutinin Structures and Antibody Recognition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Chang, C.; Ramphul, K. Amantadine. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  261. Palomba, E.; Castelli, V.; Renisi, G.; Bandera, A.; Lombardi, A.; Gori, A. Antiviral Treatments for Influenza. Semin Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 42, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Świerczyńska, M.; Mirowska-Guzel, D.M.; Pindelska, E. Antiviral Drugs in Influenza. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Aschenbrenner, D.S. Xofluza Now Indicated to Prevent Influenza. Am. J. Nurs. 2021, 121, 26–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Tanret, I.; Duh, D. The Reye syndrome. J. Pharm. Belg. 2011, 1, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  265. Chang, A.Y.; Mann, T.S.; McFawn, P.K.; Han, L.; Dong, X.; Henry, P.J. Investigating the role of MRGPRC11 and capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves in the anti-influenza effects exerted by SLIGRL-amide in murine airways. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Günther, S.; Lenz, O. Lassa virus. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2004, 41, 339–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Happi, A.N.; Happi, C.T.; Schoepp, R.J. Lassa fever diagnostics: Past, present, and future. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2019, 37, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Lukashevich, I.S.; Paessler, S.; de la Torre, J.C. Lassa virus diversity and feasibility for universal prophylactic vaccine. F1000Res 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Alcorn, J.B. Huastec Mayan Ethnobotany; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  270. Jain, S. Ethnobotany. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 1986, 11, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Cotton, C.M. Ethnobotany: Principles and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  272. Heinrich, M. Ethnobotany and its role in drug development. Phytother. Res. Int. J. Devoted Pharmacol. Toxicol. Eval. Nat. Prod. Deriv. 2000, 14, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Petran, M.; Dragos, D.; Gilca, M. Historical ethnobotanical review of medicinal plants used to treat children diseases in Romania (1860s–1970s). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2020, 16, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Balick, M.J.; Cox, P.A. Plants, People, and Culture: The Science of Ethnobotany; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  275. Teow, S.-Y.; Ali, S.A. Synergistic antibacterial activity of Curcumin with antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 28, 2109–2114. [Google Scholar]
  276. Yun, D.G.; Lee, D.G. Antibacterial activity of curcumin via apoptosis-like response in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5505–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Gunes, H.; Gulen, D.; Mutlu, R.; Gumus, A.; Tas, T.; Topkaya, A.E. Antibacterial effects of curcumin: An in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration study. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2016, 32, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Liao, Y.; Yao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, Y. Enhanced antibacterial activity of curcumin by combination with metal ions. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2018, 25, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Smyth, T.; Ramachandran, V.N.; Smyth, W.F. A study of the antimicrobial activity of selected naturally occurring and synthetic coumarins. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Choo, S.; Chin, V.K.; Wong, E.H.; Madhavan, P.; Tay, S.T.; Yong, P.V.C.; Chong, P.P. Review: Antimicrobial properties of allicin used alone or in combination with other medications. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Lauritano, D.; Petruzzi, M.; Baldoni, M. Preliminary protocol for systemic administration of capsaicin for the treatment of the burning mouth syndrome. Minerva Stomatol. 2003, 52, 273–278. [Google Scholar]
  282. Laude-Pagniez, E.; Leclerc, J.; Lok, C.; Chaby, G.; Arnault, J.P. Capsaicin 8% patch as therapy for neuropathic chronic postsurgical pain after melanoma excision surgery: A single center case series. JAAD Case Rep. 2022, 30, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Yang, S.; Liu, L.; Meng, L.; Hu, X. Capsaicin is beneficial to hyperlipidemia, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis in Guinea pigs fed on a high-fat diet. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 297, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Chan, T.C.; Lee, M.S.; Huang, W.C.; Chang, W.Y.; Krueger, J.G.; Tsai, T.F. Capsaicin attenuates imiquimod-induced epidermal hyperplasia and cutaneous inflammation in a murine model of psoriasis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 141, 111950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Thán, M.; Németh, J.; Szilvássy, Z.; Pintér, E.; Helyes, Z.; Szolcsányi, J. Systemic anti-inflammatory effect of somatostatin released from capsaicin-sensitive vagal and sciatic sensory fibres of the rat and guinea-pig. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 399, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Popescu, G.D.A.; Scheau, C.; Badarau, I.A.; Dumitrache, M.D.; Caruntu, A.; Scheau, A.E.; Costache, D.O.; Costache, R.S.; Constantin, C.; Neagu, M.; et al. The Effects of Capsaicin on Gastrointestinal Cancers. Molecules 2020, 26, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Han, T.H.; Park, M.K.; Nakamura, H.; Ban, H.S. Capsaicin inhibits HIF-1α accumulation through suppression of mitochondrial respiration in lung cancer cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Liu, X.-Y.; Wei, D.-G.; Li, R.-S. Capsaicin induces ferroptosis of NSCLC by regulating SLC7A11/GPX4 signaling in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Que, T.; Ren, B.; Fan, Y.; Liu, T.; Hou, T.; Dan, W.; Liu, B.; Wei, Y.; Lei, Y.; Zeng, J.; et al. Capsaicin inhibits the migration, invasion and EMT of renal cancer cells by inducing AMPK/mTOR-mediated autophagy. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2022, 366, 110043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Scheau, C.; Badarau, I.A.; Caruntu, C.; Mihai, G.L.; Didilescu, A.C.; Constantin, C.; Neagu, M. Capsaicin: Effects on the Pathogenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Molecules 2019, 24, 2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Georgescu, S.-R.; Sârbu, M.-I.; Matei, C.; Ilie, M.A.; Caruntu, C.; Constantin, C.; Neagu, M.; Tampa, M. Capsaicin: Friend or Foe in Skin Cancer and Other Related Malignancies? Nutrients 2017, 9, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Scheau, C.; Mihai, L.; Bădărău, I.; Caruntu, C. Emerging applications of some important natural compounds in the field of oncology. Farmacia 2020, 68, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Redington, K.L.; Disenhouse, T.; Strantzas, S.C.; Gladstone, R.; Wei, C.; Tropak, M.B.; Dai, X.; Manlhiot, C.; Li, J.; Redington, A.N. Remote cardioprotection by direct peripheral nerve stimulation and topical capsaicin is mediated by circulating humoral factors. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2012, 107, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Scheau, C.; Ilie Ghita, M.; Grigore, O.; Mihailescu, A.; Caruntu, A.; Mihai, L.; Bădărău, I.; Boda, D.; Caruntu, C. Modulation of capsaicin-induced neurogenic vasodilation by acute psychological stress. Farmacia 2021, 69, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Shin, M.K.; Yang, S.-M.; Han, I.-S. Capsaicin suppresses liver fat accumulation in high-fat diet-induced NAFLD mice. Anim. Cells Syst. 2020, 24, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, S.; Chen, Y.; Waqar, A.B.; Fan, J.; Liu, E. Expression of TRPV1 in rabbits and consuming hot pepper affects its body weight. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 7583–7589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Dumitrache, M.D.; Jieanu, A.S.; Scheau, C.; Badarau, I.A.; Popescu, G.D.A.; Caruntu, A.; Costache, D.O.; Costache, R.S.; Constantin, C.; Neagu, M.; et al. Comparative effects of capsaicin in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Aguilar-Meléndez, A.; Vásquez, M.A.; Katz, E.; Colorado, M.R.H. Los Chiles Que le Dan Sabor al Mundo: Contribuciones Multidisciplinarias; IRD Éditions: Hong Kong, China, 2018.
  299. Aguilar-Meléndez, A.; Vásquez-Dávila, M.A.; Manzanero-Medina, G.I.; Katz, E. Chile (Capsicum spp.) as Food-Medicine Continuum in Multiethnic Mexico. Foods 2021, 10, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Sarwa, K. Chapter 04—Some Indigenous Capsicum Species of India And Their Ethnomedicinal Importance Government of India. In Recent Advances in Ethnobotany; Deep Publication: New Delhi, India, 2021; pp. 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  301. Saleh, B.K.; Omer, A.; Teweldemedhin, B. Medicinal uses and health benefits of chili pepper (Capsicum spp.): A review. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2018, 6, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Meghvansi, M.K.; Siddiqui, S.; Khan, M.H.; Gupta, V.K.; Vairale, M.G.; Gogoi, H.K.; Singh, L. Naga chilli: A potential source of capsaicinoids with broad-spectrum ethnopharmacological applications. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 132, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Sayanlar, J.; Guleyupoglu, N.; Portenoy, R.; Ashina, S. Trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia responsive to treatment with capsaicin 8% topical patch: A case report. J. Headache. Pain 2012, 13, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Zis, P.; Apsokardos, A.; Isaia, C.; Sykioti, P.; Vadalouca, A. Posttraumatic and postsurgical neuropathic pain responsive to treatment with capsaicin 8% topical patch. Pain. Physician 2014, 17, E213–E218. [Google Scholar]
  305. Zeidler, C.; Metze, D.; Ständer, S. Successful treatment of lichen amyloidosis using capsaicin 8% patch. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 30, 1236–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Kocak, A.O.; Dogruyol, S.; Akbas, I.; Menekse, T.S.; Gur, S.T.A.; Kocak, M.B.; Cekmen, B.; Orun, S.; Cakir, Z. Comparison of topical capsaicin and topical piroxicam in the treatment of acute trauma-induced pain: A randomized double-blind trial. Am. J.. Emerg. Med. 2020, 38, 1767–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Hoesli, R.C.; Wingo, M.L.; Wajsberg, B.; Bastian, R.W. Topical Capsaicin for the Treatment of Sensory Neuropathic Cough. OTO Open 2021, 5, 2473974x211065668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Van Gerven, L.; Steelant, B.; Cools, L.; Callebaut, I.; Backaert, W.; de Hoon, J.; Ampe, E.; Talavera, K.; Hellings, P.W. Low-dose capsaicin (0.01 mM) nasal spray is equally effective as the current standard treatment for idiopathic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 397–400.e394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Vachiramon, V.; Tanratana, P.; Anuntrangsee, T.; Palakornkitti, P.; Yeesibsean, N.; Kungvalpivat, P.; Fabi, S. The role of topical capsaicin gel in pain management during microfocused ultrasound treatment for neck laxity. Ski. Res. Technol. 2023, 29, e13240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Hägermark, O.; Hökfelt, T.; Pernow, B. Flare and itch induced by substance P in human skin. Nation 1978, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Bartold, P.; Kylstra, A.; Lawson, R. Substance P: An immunohistochemical and biochemical study in human gingival tissues. A role for neurogenic inflammation? J. Periodontol. 1994, 65, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Figini, M.; Emanueli, C.; Bertrand, C.; Javdan, P.; Geppetti, P. Evidence that tachykinins relax the guinea-pig trachea via nitric oxide release and by stimulation of a septide-insensitive NK1 receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 117, 1270–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Simone, D.A.; Nolano, M.; Johnson, T.; Wendelschafer-Crabb, G.; Kennedy, W.R. Intradermal injection of capsaicin in humans produces degeneration and subsequent reinnervation of epidermal nerve fibers: Correlation with sensory function. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 8947–8959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Chen, F.X.; Wan, Q.; Fang, J.; Peng, L.; Li, Q.L.; Hu, J. The Src1-PGC1α-AP1 complex-dependent secretion of substance P induces inflammation and apoptosis in encephalomyocarditis virus-infected mice. Cytokine 2023, 165, 156186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Johnson, M.B.; Suptela, S.R.; Sipprell, S.E.; Marriott, I. Substance P Exacerbates the Inflammatory and Pro-osteoclastogenic Responses of Murine Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts to Staphylococcus aureus. Inflammation 2023, 46, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Arruda-Vasconcelos, R.; Chiarelli-Neto, V.M.; Louzada, L.M.; Aveiro, E.; Alves-Silva, E.G.; de-Jesus-Soares, A.; Ferraz, C.C.R.; Almeida, J.F.A.; Marciano, M.A.; Pecorari, V.G.A.; et al. Quantitative analysis of culturable bacteria, levels of endotoxins, inflammatory mediators and substance P in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and in teeth with vital normal pulp tissues. Int. Endod J. 2023, 56, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Mehboob, R.; Oehme, P.; Pfaff, G. The role of Substance P in the defense line of the respiratory tract and neurological manifestations post COVID-19 infection. Front. Neurol. 2023, 14, 1052811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Szolcsányi, J.; Barthó, L. Capsaicin-sensitive afferents and their role in gastroprotection: An update. J. Physiol. Paris 2001, 95, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Szolcsányi, J.; Helyes, Z.; Oroszi, G.; Németh, J.; Pintér, E. Release of somatostatin and its role in the mediation of the anti-inflammatory effect induced by antidromic stimulation of sensory fibres of rat sciatic nerve. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 123, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Helyes, Z.; Thán, M.; Oroszi, G.; Pintér, E.; Németh, J.; Kéri, G.; Szolcsányi, J. Anti-nociceptive effect induced by somatostatin released from sensory nerve terminals and by synthetic somatostatin analogues in the rat. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 278, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Pintér, E.; Helyes, Z.; Szolcsányi, J. Inhibitory effect of somatostatin on inflammation and nociception. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 112, 440–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. László, S.; Bátai, I.Z.; Berkó, S.; Csányi, E.; Dombi, Á.; Pozsgai, G.; Bölcskei, K.; Botz, L.; Wagner, Ö.; Pintér, E. Development of Capsaicin-Containing Analgesic Silicone-Based Transdermal Patches. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Peck, R. Neuropeptides modulating macrophage function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1987, 496, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Weinstock, J.V.; Elliott, D. The somatostatin immunoregulatory circuit present at sites of chronic inflammation. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 143, S15–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Kao, J.Y.; Pierzchala, A.; Rathinavelu, S.; Zavros, Y.; Tessier, A.; Merchant, J.L. Somatostatin inhibits dendritic cell responsiveness to Helicobacter pylori. Regul. Pept. 2006, 134, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Monaco-Shawver, L.; Schwartz, L.; Tuluc, F.; Guo, C.-J.; Lai, J.P.; Gunnam, S.M.; Kilpatrick, L.E.; Banerjee, P.P.; Douglas, S.D.; Orange, J.S. Substance P inhibits natural killer cell cytotoxicity through the neurokinin-1 receptor. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010, 89, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Froidevaux, S.; Eberle, A.N. Somatostatin analogs and radiopeptides in cancer therapy. Pept. Sci. 2002, 66, 161–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Klironomos, S.; Notas, G.; Sfakianaki, O.; Kiagiadaki, F.; Xidakis, C.; Kouroumalis, E. Octreotide modulates the effects on fibrosis of TNF-α, TGF-β and PDGF in activated rat hepatic stellate cells. Regul. Pept. 2014, 188, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Ayiomamitis, G.D.; Notas, G.; Zaravinos, A.; Drygiannakis, I.; Georgiadou, M.; Sfakianaki, O.; Mastrodimou, N.; Thermos, K.; Kouroumalis, E. Effects of octreotide and insulin on colon cancer cellular proliferation and correlation with hTERT activity. Oncoscience 2014, 1, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Kouroumalis, E.; Samonakis, D.; Notas, G. Somatostatin in hepatocellular carcinoma: Experimental and therapeutic implications. Hepatoma Res. 2018, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Periferakis, A.; Tsigas, G.; Periferakis, A.-T.; Badarau, I.A.; Scheau, A.-E.; Tampa, M.; Georgescu, S.R.; Didilescu, A.C.; Scheau, C.; Caruntu, C. Antitumoral and Anti-inflammatory Roles of Somatostatin and Its Analogs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 2021, 2021, 1840069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Kouroumalis, E.; Tsomidis, I.; Voumvouraki, A. Is There a Place for Somatostatin Analogues for the Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Immunotherapy Era? Livers 2022, 2, 315–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. McLaughlin-Drubin, M.E.; Munger, K. Viruses associated with human cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2008, 1782, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Georgakilas, A.G.; Mosley, W.G.; Georgakila, S.; Ziech, D.; Panayiotidis, M.I. Viral-induced human carcinogenesis: An oxidative stress perspective. Mol. BioSystems 2010, 6, 1162–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Alibek, K.; Kakpenova, A.; Mussabekova, A.; Sypabekova, M.; Karatayeva, N. Role of viruses in the development of breast cancer. Infect. Agents Cancer 2013, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Hatano, Y.; Ideta, T.; Hirata, A.; Hatano, K.; Tomita, H.; Okada, H.; Shimizu, M.; Tanaka, T.; Hara, A. Virus-Driven Carcinogenesis. Cancers 2021, 13, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Brizzi, K.T.; Lyons, J.L. Peripheral nervous system manifestations of infectious diseases. Neurohospitalist 2014, 4, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. De León, A.M.; Garcia-Santibanez, R.; Harrison, T.B. Article Topic: Neuropathies Due to Infections and Antimicrobial Treatments. Curr. Treat Options Neurol. 2023, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Peppin, J.F.; Pappagallo, M. Capsaicinoids in the treatment of neuropathic pain: A review. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2014, 7, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Filippi, A.; Caruntu, C.; Gheorghe, R.O.; Deftu, A.; Amuzescu, B.; Ristoiu, V. Catecholamines reduce transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 desensitization in cultured dorsal root ganglia neurons. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2016, 67, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  341. Mihai, A.; Chitimus, D.M.; Jurcut, C.; Blajut, F.C.; Opris-Belinski, D.; Caruntu, C.; Ionescu, R.; Caruntu, A. Comparative Analysis of Hematological and Immunological Parameters in Patients with Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome and Peripheral Neuropathy. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Kazamel, M.; Stino, A.M.; Smith, A.G. Metabolic syndrome and peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2021, 63, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Bucurica, S.; Prodan, I.; Pavalean, M.; Taubner, C.; Bucurica, A.; Socol, C.; Calin, R.; Ionita-Radu, F.; Jinga, M. Association of Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency with Pathology in Hospitalized Patients. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Kawada, T.; Suzuki, T.; Takahashi, M.; Iwai, K. Gastrointestinal absorption and metabolism of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1984, 72, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Sharma, S.K.; Vij, A.S.; Sharma, M. Mechanisms and clinical uses of capsaicin. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 720, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  346. Chanda, S.; Bashir, M.; Babbar, S.; Koganti, A.; Bley, K. In vitro hepatic and skin metabolism of capsaicin. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008, 36, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Qin, L.; Wang, Y.; Gong, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, B.; Tang, L.; Guo, L.; Xie, J. Capsaicin metabolites and GSH-associated detoxification and biotransformation pathways in human liver microsomes revealed by LC-HRMS/MS with data-mining tools. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2019, 1133, 121843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Rollyson, W.D.; Stover, C.A.; Brown, K.C.; Perry, H.E.; Stevenson, C.D.; McNees, C.A.; Ball, J.G.; Valentovic, M.A.; Dasgupta, P. Bioavailability of capsaicin and its implications for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2014, 196, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Babbar, S.; Marier, J.F.; Mouksassi, M.S.; Beliveau, M.; Vanhove, G.F.; Chanda, S.; Bley, K. Pharmacokinetic analysis of capsaicin after topical administration of a high-concentration capsaicin patch to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Ther. Drug Monit. 2009, 31, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Zak, A.; Siwinska, N.; Slowikowska, M.; Borowicz, H.; Szpot, P.; Zawadzki, M.; Niedzwiedz, A. The detection of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in horse serum following long-term local administration. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Goci, E.; Haloci, E.; Di Stefano, A.; Chiavaroli, A.; Angelini, P.; Miha, A.; Cacciatore, I.; Marinelli, L. Evaluation of In Vitro Capsaicin Release and Antimicrobial Properties of Topical Pharmaceutical Formulation. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  352. Reilly, C.A.; Yost, G.S. Metabolism of capsaicinoids by P450 enzymes: A review of recent findings on reaction mechanisms, bio-activation, and detoxification processes. Drug Metab. Rev. 2006, 38, 685–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. van Eijl, S.; Zhu, Z.; Cupitt, J.; Gierula, M.; Götz, C.; Fritsche, E.; Edwards, R.J. Elucidation of xenobiotic metabolism pathways in human skin and human skin models by proteomic profiling. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Tian, K.; Zhu, J.; Li, M.; Qiu, X. Capsaicin is efficiently transformed by multiple cytochrome P450s from Capsicum fruit-feeding Helicoverpa armigera. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 156, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Marquez-Algaba, E.; Burgos, J.; Almirante, B. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions for the treatment of bacterial prostatitis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2022, 23, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Norman, G.; Dumville, J.C.; Mohapatra, D.P.; Owens, G.L.; Crosbie, E.J. Antibiotics and antiseptics for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 3, Cd011712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Dragosloveanu, Ş.; Dragosloveanu, C.D.M.; Stanca, H.T.; Cotor, D.C.; Dragosloveanu, C.I.; Stoica, C.I. A new perspective towards failure of gamma nail systems. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  358. Monaghan, M.G.; Murphy, C.M. Old Drugs, New Tricks–Redefining Therapeutic Strategies for Tissue Regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 173, 279–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Bergren, D.R. Capsaicin challenge, reflex bronchoconstriction, and local action of substance P. Am. J. Physiol. 1988, 254, R845–R852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  360. Thomas, K.C.; Ethirajan, M.; Shahrokh, K.; Sun, H.; Lee, J.; Cheatham, T.E., 3rd; Yost, G.S.; Reilly, C.A. Structure-activity relationship of capsaicin analogs and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1-mediated human lung epithelial cell toxicity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Trevisan, G.; Rossato, M.F.; Hoffmeister, C.; Oliveira, S.M.; Silva, C.R.; Matheus, F.C.; Mello, G.C.; Antunes, E.; Prediger, R.D.; Ferreira, J. Mechanisms involved in abdominal nociception induced by either TRPV1 or TRPA1 stimulation of rat peritoneum. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 714, 332–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Kwon, Y. Estimation of Dietary Capsaicinoid Exposure in Korea and Assessment of Its Health Effects. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  363. Xu, Y.; Gu, Q.; Qu, C. Capsaicin pretreatment reversed pulmonary arterial hypertension by alleviating inflammation via p38MAPK pathway. Exp. Lung Res. 2017, 43, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Lechner, A.; Alderson, T.; Gautam, S.; Flaker, G. Ventricular fibrillation due to coronary spasm after pepper spray. Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2021, 44, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  365. Jancsó, G.; Király, E.; Such, G.; Joó, F.; Nagy, A. Neurotoxic effect of capsaicin in mammals. Acta. Physiol. Hung. 1987, 69, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  366. Ritter, S.; Dinh, T.T. Capsaicin-induced neuronal degeneration in the brain and retina of preweanling rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990, 296, 447–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Forrester, M.B.; Holloway, C. Characteristics of pepper spray-related injuries reported to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System during 2000–2020. Clin. Toxicol. 2022, 60, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. McGilton, K.S.; Höbler, F.; Campos, J.; Dupuis, K.; Labreche, T.; Guthrie, D.M.; Jarry, J.; Singh, G.; Wittich, W. Hearing and vision screening tools for long-term care residents with dementia: Protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  369. Stoica, C.I.; Nedelea, G.; Cotor, D.C.; Gherghe, M.; Georgescu, D.E.; Dragosloveanu, C.; Dragosloveanu, S. The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Medicina 2022, 58, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Sloane, P.D.; Whitson, H.; Williams, S.W. Addressing Hearing and Vision Impairment in Long-Term Care: An Important and Often-Neglected Care Priority. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2021, 22, 1151–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Ologunagba, M.; Kolawole, O.; Echerenwa, A.; Silva, B. Development and characterization of capsaicin creams formulated with Grewia mucilage-HPMC base. J. Sci. Pract. Pharm. 2023, 7, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Trbojević Ivić, J.; Milosavić, N.; Dimitrijević, A.; Gavrović Jankulović, M.; Bezbradica, D.; Kolarski, D.; Veličković, D. Synthesis of medium-chain length capsinoids from coconut oil catalyzed by Candida rugosa lipases. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Tangwatcharin, P.; Khopaibool, P. Activity of virgin coconut oil, lauric acid or monolaurin in combination with lactic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2012, 43, 969–985. [Google Scholar]
  374. Shilling, M.; Matt, L.; Rubin, E.; Visitacion, M.P.; Haller, N.A.; Grey, S.F.; Woolverton, C.J. Antimicrobial effects of virgin coconut oil and its medium-chain fatty acids on Clostridium difficile. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Peedikayil, F.C.; Remy, V.; John, S.; Chandru, T.P.; Sreenivasan, P.; Bijapur, G.A. Comparison of antibacterial efficacy of coconut oil and chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans: An in vivo study. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2016, 6, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Widianingrum, D.C.; Noviandi, C.T.; Salasia, S.I.O. Antibacterial and immunomodulator activities of virgin coconut oil (VCO) against Staphylococcus aureus. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Hariyadi, D.M.; Fitri, A.; Sudarma, S.; Purwanti, T.; Erawati, T. Optimization of microspheres containing virgin coconut oil and hydrolyzed virgin coconut oil as antimicrobial. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2022, 13, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Elmore, L.K.; Nance, G.; Singleton, S.; Lorenz, L. Treatment of dermal infections with topical coconut oil. Nat. Med. J. 2014, 6. Available online: https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/treatment-dermal-infections-topical-coconut-oil (accessed on 12 September 2023).
  379. Lassen, C.L.; Meyer, K.; Bredthauer, A.; Klier, T.W. Facial and Oral Cross-Contamination of a 3-Year-Old Child with High Concentration Capsaicin: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2020, 14, e01258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  380. Yeung, M.F.; Tang, W.Y. Clinicopathological effects of pepper (oleoresin capsicum) spray. Hong Kong Med. J. 2015, 21, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Nirmala Grace, A.; Pandian, K. Antibacterial efficacy of aminoglycosidic antibiotics protected gold nanoparticles—A brief study. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 297, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Turos, E.; Shim, J.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Greenhalgh, K.; Reddy, G.S.K.; Dickey, S.; Lim, D.V. Antibiotic-conjugated polyacrylate nanoparticles: New opportunities for development of anti-MRSA agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  383. Saha, B.; Bhattacharya, J.; Mukherjee, A.; Ghosh, A.; Santra, C.; Dasgupta, A.K.; Karmakar, P. In Vitro Structural and Functional Evaluation of Gold Nanoparticles Conjugated Antibiotics. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2007, 2, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  384. Galdiero, S.; Falanga, A.; Vitiello, M.; Cantisani, M.; Marra, V.; Galdiero, M. Silver Nanoparticles as Potential Antiviral Agents. Molecules 2011, 16, 8894–8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  385. Milovanovic, M.; Arsenijevic, A.; Milovanovic, J.; Kanjevac, T.; Arsenijevic, N. Chapter 14—Nanoparticles in Antiviral Therapy. In Antimicrobial Nanoarchitectonics; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 383–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Gurunathan, S.; Qasim, M.; Choi, Y.; Do, J.T.; Park, C.; Hong, K.; Kim, J.-H.; Song, H. Antiviral Potential of Nanoparticles—Can Nanoparticles Fight against Coronaviruses? Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Trombino, S.; Mellace, S.; Cassano, R. Solid lipid nanoparticles for antifungal drugs delivery for topical applications. Ther. Deliv. 2016, 7, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Soliman, G.M. Nanoparticles as safe and effective delivery systems of antifungal agents: Achievements and challenges. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 523, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Nami, S.; Aghebati-Maleki, A.; Aghebati-Maleki, L. Current applications and prospects of nanoparticles for antifungal drug delivery. EXCLI J. 2021, 20, 562. [Google Scholar]
  390. Elmi, T.; Gholami, S.; Fakhar, M.; Azizi, F. A review on the use of nanoparticles in the treatment. J. Maz. Univ. Med. Sci. 2013, 23, 126–133. [Google Scholar]
  391. Rahul, S.; Chandrashekhar, P.; Hemant, B.; Bipinchandra, S.; Mouray, E.; Grellier, P.; Satish, P. In vitro antiparasitic activity of microbial pigments and their combination with phytosynthesized metal nanoparticles. Parasitol. Int. 2015, 64, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  392. Sun, Y.; Chen, D.; Pan, Y.; Qu, W.; Hao, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Xie, S. Nanoparticles for antiparasitic drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2019, 26, 1206–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Date, A.A.; Joshi, M.D.; Patravale, V.B. Parasitic diseases: Liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles versus lipid nanoparticles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 505–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  394. Matei, A.-M.; Caruntu, C.; Tampa, M.; Georgescu, S.R.; Matei, C.; Constantin, M.M.; Constantin, T.V.; Calina, D.; Ciubotaru, D.A.; Badarau, I.A. Applications of nanosized-lipid-based drug delivery systems in wound care. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Antibacterial actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
Table 1. Antibacterial actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
GenusSpeciesExtract fromMIC (μg/mL)Year of ResearchReference
Gram Positive
StaphylococcusS. aureusCapsicum frutescens1.22014[85]
Capsicum chinensenot specified2018[86]
StreptococcusS. pyogenesCapsicum spp.64–1282015[87]
EnterococcusE. faecalisCapsicum frutescens252014[85]
BacillusB. subtillisCapsicum frutescens252014[85]
ListeriaL. monocytogenesCapsicum spp.not specified2018[88]
Gram Negative
VibrioV. choleraeCapsicum spp.1002010[89]
AcinetobacterA. baumaniiCapsicum annuum L.642011[90]
HelicobacterH. pyloriCapsicum spp.252005[91]
SalmonellaS. typhimuriumCapsicum chinensenot specified2022[92]
EscherichiaE. coliCapsicum frutescens52014[85]
Capsicum chinesenot specified2018[86]
KlebsiellaK. pneumoniaeCapsicum frutescens0.62014[85]
ProteusP. mirabilisCapsicum annuum L.322011[90]
PseudomonasP. aeruginosaCapsicum frutescens102014[85]
Capsicum spp.not specified2018[93]
Table 2. Antifungal actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
Table 2. Antifungal actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
GenusSpeciesExtract fromMIC (μg/mL)Year of ResearchReference
CandidaC. albicans,
C. glabrata,
C. tropicalis
Capsicum frutescens25 (MIC100)2014[85]
Capsicum chinense187.5–1500 (MIC100)2022[189]
ApsergillusA. parasiticusCapsicum chinense68 (MIC50)2020[190]
381 (MIC50)2020[191]
Table 3. Antiparasitic actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
Table 3. Antiparasitic actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
GenusSpeciesExtract fromIC50Year of ResearchReference
ToxoplasmaT. gondiiCapsicum chinense42.12 µg/mL2022[189]
TrypanosomaT. cruziCapsicum spp.0.26–6.26 µM2020[217]
Table 4. Antiviral actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
Table 4. Antiviral actions of capsaicin based on existing research.
FamilyGenusExtract fromEC50 (μmol/L)Year of ResearchReference
OrthomyxoviridaeInfluenzaCapsicum spp.n/a2022[254]
ArenaviridaeLassaCapsicum spp.From 6.1 to over 30 (strain-dependent)2020[255]
EC50 = Half maximal effective concentration.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Periferakis, A.-T.; Periferakis, A.; Periferakis, K.; Caruntu, A.; Badarau, I.A.; Savulescu-Fiedler, I.; Scheau, C.; Caruntu, C. Antimicrobial Properties of Capsaicin: Available Data and Future Research Perspectives. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194097

AMA Style

Periferakis A-T, Periferakis A, Periferakis K, Caruntu A, Badarau IA, Savulescu-Fiedler I, Scheau C, Caruntu C. Antimicrobial Properties of Capsaicin: Available Data and Future Research Perspectives. Nutrients. 2023; 15(19):4097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Periferakis, Aristodemos-Theodoros, Argyrios Periferakis, Konstantinos Periferakis, Ana Caruntu, Ioana Anca Badarau, Ilinca Savulescu-Fiedler, Cristian Scheau, and Constantin Caruntu. 2023. "Antimicrobial Properties of Capsaicin: Available Data and Future Research Perspectives" Nutrients 15, no. 19: 4097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194097

APA Style

Periferakis, A. -T., Periferakis, A., Periferakis, K., Caruntu, A., Badarau, I. A., Savulescu-Fiedler, I., Scheau, C., & Caruntu, C. (2023). Antimicrobial Properties of Capsaicin: Available Data and Future Research Perspectives. Nutrients, 15(19), 4097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop