Next Article in Journal
Microbial and Chemical Profiles of Commercial Kombucha Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Guava Fruit and Acacia pennata Vegetable Intake Association with Frailty of Older Adults in Northern Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential Role of Gut Microbiota in Alzheimer’s Disease: From Diagnosis to Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Short-Term Pre-Operative Protein Caloric Restriction in Elective Vascular Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/nu14030669
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparison of Dietary Intake and Nutritional Status between Aged Care Residents Consuming Texture-Modified Diets with and without Oral Nutritional Supplements

by
Xiaojing Sharon Wu
1,*,
Lina Yousif
1,
Anna Miles
2 and
Andrea Braakhuis
1
1
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
2
Department of Speech Science, School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(3), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030669
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 28 January 2022 / Accepted: 2 February 2022 / Published: 5 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macronutrients in Frailty and Aging)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are high-energy and protein-rich nutrition drinks that are commonly prescribed to individuals with compromised nutritional status. Aged care residents requiring texture-modified diets are exposed to poor oral intake and malnutrition. This study aimed to investigate the dietary intake and nutritional status of residents consuming texture-modified diets with and without ONS. This multicentre cross-sectional study included 85 residents consuming texture-modified diets (86.0 ± 8.7 y; n = 46 requiring ONS and n = 39 without ONS). A one-day dietary record was completed using a validated visual plate waste estimation method. To determine the adequacy, nutrition intake was then calculated using FoodWorks (Xyris Ltd., Brisbane, Australia) and compared to the recommended dietary intake for Australia and New Zealand. The Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form was collected to assess nutritional status. Residents receiving ONS had significantly higher energy, protein, carbohydrates and fat intake than those who did not consume ONS (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in saturated fat, fibre or sodium intake. With the administration of ONS, residents were able to meet their protein requirement but fell short of their energy and carbohydrates requirements. Both groups had inadequate fibre intake and a high saturated fat intake. A total of 48% of the residents were at risk of malnutrition and 38% were malnourished. Aged care residents requiring texture-modified diets are at high risk of malnutrition as a result of inadequate dietary intake. Administration of ONS may be an effective strategy to optimise nutrition intake.

1. Introduction

Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are a common dietary intervention used in aged care facilities for residents who struggle with chewing or swallowing (dysphagia) [1]. The texture and consistency of solid foods and liquid are modified to ease swallowing and prevent choking and aspiration [2]. Based on the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI), TMDs are categorised into five levels: level 7—easy to chew/regular; level 6—soft and bite-sized; level 5—minced and moist; level 4—pureed; and level 3—liquidised [3]. When textures are modified, they often result in unappealing, tasteless and nutritionally-dilute food that is not well accepted by consumers [4]. Despite IDDSI providing standardised guidance for healthcare providers with regards to the texture and consistency requirements of each TMD level, the nutrition requirements still need to be addressed.
As the population ages, the prevalence of chewing and swallowing problems becomes more significant in all healthcare settings. Particularly, older adults living in aged care facilities are at a greater risk of dysphagia than those living in the community [5]. Therefore, there is a growing need for TMDs in the last decade, with 30%−47% of residents living in aged care facilities requiring TMDs [6,7,8]. Recent reviews suggest that TMD consumers have significantly lower energy intake and higher risk of malnutrition compared to those having regular diets [9,10]. In addition to increasing morbidity, mortality, hospital length of stay, readmission and costs of care, dysphagia and malnutrition are also consequences of each other [11,12]. A New Zealand study reported that aged care has a significantly higher prevalence of malnutrition and higher risk of dysphagia compared to older adults from hospital or community settings [13]. Several studies have reported that aged care residents consuming TMDs had compromised nutrition intake as a result of poor oral intake and inadequate meal portions [7,14,15].
One common approach to solve this problem involves the use of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) [16]. ONS prescription is individualised based on the gap between a resident’s energy/protein requirements and the actual intake obtained from food [17]. It has been proven that ONS are beneficial to older adults who have difficulty maintaining their nutritional intake, in particular, those with compromised nutritional status [18]. Wright et al. reported that ONS were prescribed to 54% of hospital geriatric patients on TMDs [16]. ONS are often high-energy and high-protein drinks that can potentially improve the energy and protein intake, nutritional status and survival of older malnourished adults [19,20]. Dietitians are recommended to prescribe suitable ONS to dysphagic patients at high risk of malnutrition and continually review their compliance, tolerance, weight and nutritional status [21]. Physicians and dietitians are responsible for prescribing ONS to nutritionally vulnerable residents, including inadequate oral intake, unintentional weight loss or poor wound healing [22]. ONS are available in a wide range of formats, brands and flavours which contain various nutritional values. Powder form and ready-mixed liquid form are the most common ONS used in New Zealand [17]. Despite the increased use of ONS, there is a lack of evidence to guide the use of specific ONS types, dosage, time of administration and duration in different patient groups [18,22]. To our knowledge, few studies have examined the impact and compliance of ONS on TMD consumers [23]. In relation to improving dietary intake and nutritional status in aged care residents consuming TMDs, understanding the role of ONS is essential to directing future research. The aims of this study were 1) to compare the dietary intake, adequacy and nutritional status of the residents living in aged care facilities consuming TMDs with and without ONS and 2) to examine residents’ compliance with ONS.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in five Auckland aged care facilities as part of the post-IDDSI implementation data collection in a larger project (under peer review). The STROBE statement for observational studies was followed in the design of this study [24]. The project evaluated and facilitated the implementation of IDDSI in participating aged care facilities in order to increase TMD compliance and staff understanding. In this study, a quantitative approach was employed to investigate the role of ONS and provide extensive information on the nutritional perspectives of residents consuming TMDs. Data on individuals was collected in a single day over 26 days between June 2020 and March 2021. Three facilities had to delay the data collection due to COVID-19 lockdowns. The study was approved by The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (023048) on 28 June 2019.

2.1. Subjects

Residents over 65 years old who were on TMD without enteral nutrition support and residing in one of the participating aged care facilities were eligible to participate in the study. Residents who were receiving palliative care, respite care or did not consume full TMD routinely were excluded. The five aged care facilities were recruited through convenience sampling with the strategy to include a range of small and large facilities. Facilities provided IDDSI-compliant TMDs, including soft and bite-sized, minced and moist, and pureed levels.

2.2. Data Collection

Data collection was completed by a researcher (student dietitian) (L.Y). A standard data extraction form was used to collect resident demographic information from their aged care clinical record, including age, gender, ethnicity, height, length of stay, mobility level, medical history, the reason for requiring TMDs, level of TMDs and thickened fluids. Residents were weighed at least monthly, thus the most recent weight and the weights from the previous three months were collected from their clinical record. Body mass index (BMI) was then calculated using height and weight records.

2.2.1. Dietary Assessment

A plate wastage sheet was completed for individual residents where all foods and beverages were weighed and recorded over 24 hours, including ONS. A maximum of five residents were observed in a day. The researcher was present in the facility before breakfast was served and stayed until supper. The night shift staff recorded any food or drink consumed by the resident outside of this period. The approach adopted a previously validated visual plate wastage estimation method that is applicable to different meal textures and varieties and has been used in aged care facilities [25,26]. Before serving, each food/drink item was weighed twice to the nearest gram (Salter Electronic Disk scales, Kent, UK) and recorded as a standard serving size. After residents had finished their food, the researcher used visual estimation to record the amount of food/drink/ONS that was consumed (‘all left (100%)’, ‘mouthful eaten (90%)’, ‘3/4 left (75%)’, ‘1/2 left (50%)’, ‘1/4 left (25%)’, ‘mouthful left (10%)’ and ‘none left (0%)’). The amount of each food item consumed was then calculated by subtracting the amount of waste portion from the weighed standard serving size in the sample item. Each food/drink item was also photographed before and after consumption. To minimise rater bias, another dietitian researcher (X.W) used the photos to estimate the plate wastage independently. Where disagreement arose, a third author (A.B) was consulted to meet consensus.

2.2.2. Dietary Requirement

The one-day dietary intake was entered and analysed using FoodWorks, version 10 (Xyris Ltd., Brisbane, Australia). This study analysed all available nutrients, including macronutrients: energy, protein, carbohydrates, fat, saturated fat, fibre and sodium. Other micronutrients were unavailable since the nutrition information was not listed for pre-packaged foods. To assess nutritional adequacy, dietary intakes were then compared with the recommended dietary intake (RDI) for Australian and New Zealand adults aged over 70 years old [27]. The estimated energy requirement (EER) was calculated using individual resident age, gender, BMI and physical activity level. Protein requirement was estimated using resident weight (1.07 g/kg for men and 0.94 g/kg for women). Carbohydrates and fat intake were recommended in relation to their contribution to total dietary energy. Adequate intake value was used for fibre and sodium.

2.2.3. Nutritional Status

The Mini Nutrition Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) is one of the most commonly used nutrition screening tools in aged care settings covering oral intake, weight loss, BMI, mobility, psychological and acute conditions [28,29]. Where residents had cognitive impairment, the researcher administrated the MNA-SF based on information obtained from resident clinical records and interviewing resident key workers. A score of less than 8 was identified as malnourished; 8–11 was recognised as at risk of malnutrition, and 12–14 was considered as normal nutritional status [30].

2.3. Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (v9.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A descriptive analysis of all explanatory variables was conducted and presented as mean and standard deviation for normal distribution. Median and interquartile range were reported for non-normal distribution. Compliance with the ONS was calculated for each resident based on the percentage of actual ONS consumed. To determine whether raw data distributions within each group were normal, we performed the Shapiro–Wilk test (normal distributions are defined as p > 0.05). In order to compare the nutrition intake and nutritional status between TMDs with and without ONS consumption, Welch’s t-test was used for normally distributed parameters and the Mann–Whitney test was used for non-normally distributed parameters. To explore the associations of ONS consumption with resident characteristics, Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square was performed comparing the group that consumed ONS with TMDs and the group that only had TMDs. Linear regression was used to investigate predictors of total energy intake and nutritional status (MNA-SF score). Statistical significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05.

3. Results

Among the 425 residents living in the facilities, 20% (n = 85) who required full TMDs were considered eligible. Of these, 46 residents required routine ONS administration. Resident characteristics are summarised in Table 1. No significance was found in demographic distribution between the ONS consumption group and the non-ONS consumption group. There was a significant correlation between the level of TMD prescribed and ONS consumption. Among those who consumed a minced and moist diet, only one resident did not require ONS. Three medical conditions were also found to be significantly associated with the use of ONS, including diabetes, stroke and thyroid dysfunction.

3.1. Dietary Intake

The average daily energy, protein, carbohydrates and fat intake were significantly higher among residents who consumed TMDs with ONS compared with those who did not have ONS (Table 2). There were no differences in saturated fat, fibre and sodium intake between the two groups. When comparing the daily nutrition intake to the RDI, only fat intake was within the recommended range without ONS. Protein intake was adequate when residents were given ONS.
Fortsip powder was the most common type of ONS and was used in all facilities (n = 34), followed by Ensure (n = 8) with 32% (n = 15) of the residents receiving ready-to-drink bottles. ONS powder was mixed with water or made into a milkshake. Other uncommon ONS including Beneprotein, Diasip, Cubitan, Advital, Impact advanced recovery and Calogen were administrated to one or two participants based on their medical conditions. Three times a day was the most common frequency (46%, n = 21), followed by four to five times a day (28%, n = 13) and twice a day (22%, n = 10). The average daily compliance to ONS was 86%, with a range from 17% to 100%. More than half of the residents were able to drink all the ONS provided (63%, n = 29). Among all residents, 15% (n = 7) were able to finish ≥75% of the ONS and 11% (n = 5) consumed 50–67% of prescribed ONS. Nine percent (n = 7) of the residents had a compliance rate below 50%.
ONS contributed 35% energy (558 ± 256 kcal), 38% protein (26 ± 10 g), 36% carbohydrate (68 ± 33 g) and 28% (18 ± 17 g) fat intake to the overall average daily intake. Without ONS, the two groups had no differences in energy (1011 ± 355 vs. 1169 ± 413 kcal, p = 0.08), protein (43 ± 19 vs. 49 ± 16 g, p = 0.1), carbohydrate (119 ± 46 vs. 126 ± 42 g, p = 0.48) and fat (41 ± 16 vs. 50 ± 29 g, p = 0.21) intake. As shown in Table 3, a higher proportion of residents who consumed TMDs with ONS were able to meet their macronutrient requirements as compared to residents who did not have ONS.

3.2. Nutritional Status

Table 4 compares the nutritional status and MNA-SF measurements between the ONS consumption group and the non-ONS consumption group. Residents who required ONS had significantly lower weight and BMI. They also scored lower in MNA-SF. When compared to individuals who did not require ONS, the proportion of well-nourished residents in the ONS consumption group was significantly lower. In total, 51% (n = 43) and 32% (n = 27) of the residents had neuropsychological problems. A positive association was only found between the consumption of ONS and energy intake as indicated by the multiple linear regression analysis (Table 5). The MNA-SF model identified four contributors, including age, feeding assistance, TMD level and BMI. The negative association of age and feeding assistance indicated that both older residents and residents requiring more feeding assistance scored lower in MNA-SF. In contrast, the less food modification required (higher level of TMDs) and the greater the BMI, the higher MNA-SF was scored.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the nutrition adequacy and evaluating the role of ONS in New Zealand aged care residents consuming TMDs. For residents who consumed ONS, their ONS was a notable contribution to their daily energy and protein intake. ONS consumers had significantly higher nutrition intake but lower MNA-SF scores and weights, and there was a lower percentage of well-nourished individuals (MNA-SF ≥ 12). Findings suggest that the prescription of ONS was associated with several resident characteristics, including the TMD level, medical conditions and nutritional status. These results support the recommendation by Holdoway and Smith for dysphagic patients at high risk of malnutrition to receive ONS [12]. Previous studies revealed that the level of TMDs patients received is related to medical conditions such as dementia [31]. Although previous studies indicate that the reasons behind TMD orders are unclear, our study concurs with Wright’s and Miles et al.’s findings that medical status and poor dental health were significant factors in the TMD prescription [7,16,32]. In contrast to Canadian and Australian aged-care facilities, both Miles and our study found that Level 4 puree diets were the most common type of TMDs rather than Level 6 soft and bite-sized or Level 5 minced and moist diets [7,33,34]. The small number of residents consuming minced and moist diets limits the ability to make conclusions in ONS prescription among TMD levels. Moreover, we found no significant correlation between demographic and energy intake based on a multiple linear regression analysis, which suggests the study population was relatively homogeneous. Future research should include larger groups of participants from each level of TMD in order to determine whether ONS use has a direct association with TMD levels.

4.1. Nutrition Intake and Adequacy

Studies that compared the nutritional intake of TMDs and regular diets have established that aged care TMD consumers have insufficient energy and protein intake [14,15,26,35]. The average energy and protein intake results from our study were similar to the results from other studies assessing aged care TMD consumers. Without any nutritional intervention, the average energy and protein intake ranged between 908 kcal to 1764 kcal and 42 g to 70 g, respectively [14,26]. The variance in TMD levels can explain the noticeable differences in nutrition intake. Puree diets are usually less appealing and more nutrient-diluted due to the higher level of texture and consistency modification [4,36]. The significant contribution of ONS to macronutrients is noticeable; similar effectiveness was found by Wright et al. in hospitalised geriatric patients consuming TMDs [16]. The positive association between ONS consumption and energy intake is also supported by a recent review which concluded that improved macronutrient intake can be achieved by providing ONS [9]. Our results demonstrate that ONS intake does not reduce the amount of food consumed. Therefore, ONS can be an effective addition to residents’ usual diets giving the benefits of increased macronutrient intake. With the appropriate use of ONS, residents were more likely to meet their nutritional requirements. Although some studies suggested ONS consumption may lead to decreased appetite and therefore reduced nutrition intake from the food, it needs to be further examined in TMD consumers [22,37]. The volume and frequency of ONS are required to be monitored and adjusted as nutritional status improves [38]. Despite only protein and fat achieving recommended daily intake, a previous ONS and food trial demonstrated improvements in albumin, total iron-binding capacity, transferrin and body weight when the nutritional intake of residents reached 100% of recommended values for key macro and micronutrients [23]. The inadequate dietary intake can be a result of loss of appetite, inadequate nutrient provision from the menu, poor meal compliance, impaired chewing and swallowing function and reduced motivation to eat due to social isolation or depression [7,16,26,39]. A significant amount of research has demonstrated that aged care menus are significantly low in nutrients and below the RDI, in particular, pureed menus [26,35,36,40,41,42]. The compromised carbohydrate intake can be explained by the similar results found in New Zealand aged care facilities where only 26%, 63% and 79% of the TMD menus offered adequate portion sizes of carbohydrate, protein and vegetables, respectively [43]. To ensure the nutrition quality of TMD menus, dietitians should conduct menu audits regularly [44]. Foodservice staff are required to follow dietitian recommended standardised recipes to allow consistent and highly nutritious meal productions [40].
Despite the positive impact of ONS on macronutrients, the fibre intake was concerningly low and almost identical between the two observation groups. The inadequate fibre intake is consistent with a previous review reporting low fibre consumption in all studies investigating TMDs [9]. Fibrous content can be destroyed during food modification which leads to lower fibre components in TMD menus compared to regular menus [36]. Consumption of insufficient fibre is associated with a greater risk of constipation, particularly among aged care residents with high prevalence of constipation [45]. Residents on pureed diets receiving fibre-fortified cereal along with ONS reported a low fibre intake of 12 g per day [23]. Although there was limited evidence investigating fibre enrichment in TMD consumers, Cruz-Jentoft et al. found a compelling result using protein and fibre enriched ONS (20% protein, 2 g fibre/100 mL) in residents who are undernourished or at risk of malnutrition, which improved both nutritional status and bowel movement and reduced digestive symptoms [46]. Further studies are required to explore the effect on improved fibre intake in TMD consumers.

4.2. ONS Compliance

Although there has been an increased prescription of ONS in aged care facilities, the prescription standards of ONS are still inconclusive [18]. A 54% prevalence of ONS administration in our study is similar to Vucea et al.’s report showing that 57% of puree diet residents were on ONS [47]. The compliance of ONS is a significant contributor to the effectiveness of ONS on nutrition intake and nutritional status. Although long-term compliance is arguable, Hubbard et al.’s review found no significant relationship between ONS compliance and the duration of ONS consumption or the ONS variety [48]. ONS compliance in TMD consumers has been less investigated. Our study found the TMD consumers had 8% higher compliance than the 78% overall mean compliance extracted from 46 studies of ONS [48]. This result agrees with the findings of other studies investigating ONS compliance in residents who are undernourished or at risk of malnutrition, in which ONS was well accepted for three to six months [23,46]. Aged care residents are more likely to have better compliance compared to hospital patients. The fact that ONS is routinely served by familiar nurses and healthcare assistants could encourage consumption. Front line clinical staff awareness and assistance can effectively improve resident nutrition intake and prevent weight loss, including supplement administration [49]. Although ONS were commonly served at mid-meals, it was hard to analyse the timing of ONS administration due to the large heterogeneities among facilities and resident needs. According to de Sa and colleagues, ONS is more accepted at afternoon tea and morning tea, and it was better complied by TMD patients than those on regular diets [50]. Besides ONS, other sources of nutrition support should also be considered to use in combination with ONS, such as dietitian counselling and food-first strategy [17,22,51]. By nutrient fortification and/or providing small and frequent meals, the food-first strategy had positive effects on nutritionally vulnerable older adults [9].

4.3. Nutritional Status

It is evident that inadequate nutrition intake from consuming TMDs can have a detrimental effect on both nutritional and functional status [52]. Residents with (94%) or without ONS (77%) consumption both had a high prevalence of malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition. These results were consistent with previous local aged care investigations [13,53]. The high prevalence of malnutrition implies the importance of assessing the risk of malnutrition in those with dysphagia due to their close associations [54]. The current study supports the existing literature which provides evidence for the importance of malnutrition screening and continual assessment in the aged care setting in order to reduce the risk of complications [11]. Besides the common factors contributing to compromised nutritional status, such as weight, BMI and age, our study proved that increased demand for feeding assistance and advanced modifications in TMDs were also important factors in predicting nutritional status. Although the average MNA-SF score of 8.3 (2.9) indicates a risk of malnutrition, some residents had reasonable meal consumption and/or insignificant weight loss. The low score was limited to the high prevalence of dementia/psychological disorders (83%) and immobility (69%). Vucea et al. confirmed this finding in a larger cross-sectional study, with an 8.5 (2.4) average MNA-SF score among pureed diet indicating residents with diagnosed dementia and high level of cognitive impairment had significantly lower MNA-SF scores [47]. The prescription of ONS was most likely related to the higher prevalence of compromised nutritional status (94%), as evidenced by the lower weight, BMI and MNA-SF score in the ONS consumption group. This finding matches the observation in Miles et al.’s study, which demonstrated the significant association between decreased weight or BMI and increased number of weeks on nutrient-fortified TMDs [55]. Despite few studies examining the impact of ONS on nutritional status change in TMD consumers, Welch et al. demonstrated significant weight improvement after three months and six months of ONS consumption. A review concluded that older adults would have a small but consistent weight gain with the addition of ONS, while their mortality risk would also be significantly reduced if they were malnourished prior to commencement of ONS [56]. Improved MNA-SF score, weight, BMI and functional status were found in a three-month ONS intervention in Spanish aged care residents who had been diagnosed with malnutrition [57].

4.4. Limitations and Future Directions

The results from this study are consistent with the findings obtained in other international aged care setting studies and will inform future intervention development. All facilities had implemented IDDSI, therefore, the terminologies and descriptions were consistent. However, this research is subject to certain limitations due to the cross-sectional design. Without longitudinal data, it was impossible to determine the long-term causal relationship between ONS consumption and nutrition intake or nutritional status. Although we included all eligible participants from each facility, facilities were selected through convenience sampling. Volunteer facilities may have better foodservice practices, and therefore the nutrition intake and nutritional status may be overestimated. While plate wastage estimation is a validated measure of food consumption, we only collected a one-day food record which may not be representable to their usual overall dietary patterns.
Further, mealtime assistance and dining environment also play important roles in optimising resident oral intake [58,59]. Unfortunately, these factors were not analysed in this study. This was not a randomised clinical trial with a randomised allocation of matched residents into ONS and non-ONS and instead offers an interesting observation of differences between those with dysphagia prescribed ONS and those who are not.
Although ONS can be an effective intervention to improve dietary intake and nutritional status, the long-term cost needs to be considered. Food fortification may be an alternative cost-effective way to improve intake by having more nutrient-dense TMDs [9]. To avoid unnecessary prescribing and inappropriate use, dietitians should be consulted for initial assessment and continual review. Additionally, when choosing the type of ONS, dietitians should consider the thickening level of the drink in order to avoid risks associated with viscosity [60].

5. Conclusions

Aged care residents on TMDs are at higher risk of inadequate nutrition intake and malnutrition. To optimise oral intake, it may be necessary to consider offering nutrient-dense food or drinks, such as ONS. An individual dietitian assessment should be provided to at-risk residents. Dietitians should also collaborate with foodservice staff to create standardised TMD menus that provide sufficient nutrients to ensure residents are able to consume adequate nutritional intake. Although prescription of ONS provides promising results in improving resident intake, long-term compliance and nutritional status need to be monitored. Our study has demonstrated that ONS is well-accepted by aged care TMD consumers, and consumption of ONS was associated with increased daily intake. Further research is required to continue to explore whether ONS consumption is positively associated with nutrition intake and nutritional status in TMD consumers.

Author Contributions

This research idea was conceptualised by all authors. Study methodology was finalised by X.S.W.; with input from A.B. and A.M.; L.Y. and X.S.W. collected the data; X.S.W. conducted statistical analysis with input from A.B.; X.S.W. wrote the first draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the University of Auckland Ethics Committee (project code: 023048, date of approval: 28 June 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants and facilities involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the participants to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garcia, J.M.; Chambers, E. Managing dysphagia through diet modifications. Am. J. Nurs. 2010, 110, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Clavé, P.; Shaker, R. Dysphagia: Current reality and scope of the problem. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cichero, J.A.Y.; Lam, P.; Steele, C.M.; Hanson, B.; Chen, J.; Dantas, R.O.; Duivestein, J.; Kayashita, J.; Lecko, C.; Murray, J.; et al. Development of international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened fluids used in dysphagia management: The IDDSI framework. Dysphagia 2017, 32, 293–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ilhamto, N.; Anciado, K.; Keller, H.H.; Duizer, L.M. In-house pureed food production in long-term care: Perspectives of dietary staff and implications for improvement. J. Nutr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2014, 33, 210–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pauly, L.; Stehle, P.; Volkert, D. Nutritional situation of elderly nursing home residents. Zeitschrift Gerontologie Geriatrie 2007, 40, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hotaling, D.L. Nutritional considerations for the pureed diet texture in dysphagic elderly. Dysphagia 1992, 7, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miles, A.; Liang, V.; Sekula, J.; Broadmore, S.; Owen, P.; Braakhuis, A.J. Texture-modified diets in aged care facilities: Nutrition, swallow safety and mealtime experience. Australas. J. Ageing 2019, 39, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vucea, V.; Keller, H.H.; Morrison, J.M.; Duizer, L.M.; Duncan, A.M.; Steele, C.M. Prevalence and characteristics associated with modified texture food use in long term care: An analysis of making the most of mealtimes (M3) project. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 2019, 80, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, X.S.; Miles, A.; Braakhuis, A. Nutritional intake and meal composition of patients consuming texture modified diets and thickened fluids: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare 2020, 8, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, X.S.; Miles, A.; Braakhuis, A.J. Texture-modified diets, nutritional status and mealtime satisfaction: A systematic review. Healthcare 2021, 9, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Namasivayam, A.M.; Steele, C.M. Malnutrition and dysphagia in long-term care: A systematic review. J. Nutr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2015, 34, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Holdoway, A.; Smith, A. Meeting nutritional need and managing patients with dysphagia. J. Community Nurs. 2020, 34, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wham, C.; Fraser, E.; Buhs-Catterall, J.; Watkin, R.; Gammon, C.; Allen, J. Malnutrition risk of older people across district health board community, hospital and residential care settings in New Zealand. Australas. J. Ageing 2017, 36, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Massoulard, A.; Bonnabau, H.; Gindre-Poulvelarie, L.; Baptistev, A.; Preux, P.M.; Villemonteix, C.; Javerliat, V.; Fraysse, J.L.; Desport, J.C. Analysis of the food consumption of 87 elderly nursing home residents, depending on food texture. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2011, 15, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bannerman, E.; McDermott, K. Dietary and fluid intakes of older adults in care homes requiring a texture modified diet: The role of snacks. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2011, 12, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wright, L.; Cotter, D.; Hickson, M.; Frost, G. Comparison of energy and protein intakes of older people consuming a texture modified diet with a normal hospital diet. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2005, 18, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilkinson, T.; Macleod, S. Strategies to improve nutrition in elderly people. Best Pract. J. 2008, 15, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  18. Todorovic, V. Evidence-based strategies for the use of oral nutritional supplements. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2005, 10, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Milne, A.C.; Avenell, A.; Potter, J. Meta-analysis: Protein and energy supplementation in older people. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cawood, A.L.; Elia, M.; Stratton, R.J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements. Ageing Res. Rev. 2012, 11, 278–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taylor, N. Overview of oral nutrition supplements and their use. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2020, 25, S12–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johnson, S.; Nasser, R.; Banow, T.; Cockburn, T.; Voegeli, L.; Wilson, O.; Coleman, J. Use of oral nutrition supplements in long-term care facilities. Can. J. Diet Pract. Res. 2009, 70, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Welch, P.K.; Dowson, M.; Endres, J.M. The effect of nutrient supplements on high risk long term care residents receiving pureed diets. J. Nutr. Elder. 1991, 10, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007, 335, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sherwin, A.J.; Nowson, C.A.; McPhee, J.; Alexander, J.L.; Wark, J.D.; Flicker, L. Nutrient intake at meals in residential care facilities for the aged: Validated visual estimation of plate waste. Aust. J. Nutr. Diet. 1998, 55, 188–193. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nowson, C.A.; Sherwin, A.J.; McPhee, J.G.; Wark, J.D.; Flicker, L. Energy, protein, calcium, vitamin D and fibre intakes from meals in residential care establishments in Australia. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 12, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand Including Recommended Dietary Intakes; NHMRC: Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2005; ISBN 1864962372.
  28. Keller, H.; Vucea, V.; Slaughter, S.E.; Jager-Wittenaar, H.; Lengyel, C.; Ottery, F.D.; Carrier, N. Prevalence of malnutrition or risk in residents in long term care: Comparison of four tools. J. Nutr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2019, 38, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kaiser, M.J.; Bauer, J.M.; Uter, W.; Donini, L.M.; Stange, I.; Volkert, D.; Diekmann, R.; Drey, M.; Bollwein, J.; Tempera, S.; et al. Prospective validation of the modified mini nutritional assessment short-forms in the community, nursing home, and rehabilitation setting. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011, 59, 2124–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaiser, M.J.; Bauer, J.M.; Ramsch, C.; Uter, W.; Guigoz, Y.; Cederholm, T.; Thomas, D.R.; Anthony, P.; Charlton, K.E.; Maggio, M.; et al. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA®-SF): A practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cormier, D.; Harper, D.W.; O’Hara, P.A.; Brillant, C.; Caissie, D.; Dubeau, J.; Mitalas, J. Pureed diet: Prevalence and reported reasons for use in a long-term care hospital. J. Can. Diet. Assoc. 1994, 55, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumlien, S.; Axelsson, K. Stroke patients in nursing homes: Eating, feeding, nutrition and related care. J. Clin. Nurs. 2002, 11, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vucea, V.; Keller, H.H.; Morrison, J.M.; Duizer, L.M.; Duncan, A.M.; Carrier, N.; Lengyel, C.O.; Slaughter, S.E.; Steele, C.M. Modified texture food use is associated with malnutrition in long term care: An analysis of making the most of mealtimes (M3) project. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2018, 22, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Grieger, J.A.; Nowson, C.A. Nutrient intake and plate waste from an Australian residential care facility. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Johnson, R.M.; Smiciklas-Wright, H.; Soucy, I.M. Nutrient intake of nursing-home residents receiving pureed foods or a regular diet. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1995, 43, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Durant, M. A comparison of energy provision by diet order in a long-term care facility. Can. J. Aging/Revue Canadienne Vieillissement 2008, 27, 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lauque, S. Protein-energy oral supplementation in malnourished nursing-home residents. A controlled trial. Age Ageing 2000, 29, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Stratton, R.J.; Elia, M. A review of reviews: A new look at the evidence for oral nutritional supplements in clinical practice. Clin. Nutr. Suppl. 2007, 2, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ministry of Health. Food and Nutrition Guidelines for Healthy Older People: A Background Paper; Minstry of Health: Wellington, New Zealand, 2013; ISBN 9780478393996.
  40. Vucea, V.; Keller, H.H.; Morrison, J.M.; Duncan, A.M.; Duizer, L.M.; Carrier, N.; Lengyel, C.O.; Slaughter, S.E. Nutritional quality of regular and pureed menus in Canadian long term care homes: An analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) project. BMC Nutr. 2017, 3, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dahl, W.J.; Whiting, S.J.; Tyler, R.T. Protein content of pureed diets: Implications for planning. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 2007, 68, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Beck, A.M.; Hansen, K.S. Meals served in Danish nursing homes and to meals-on-wheels clients may not offer nutritionally adequate choices. J. Nutr. Elder. 2010, 29, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, V. The Use of Texture Modified Diets in Residential Care Facilities in Auckland. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  44. Burger, C.; Kiesswetter, E.; Alber, R.; Pfannes, U.; Arens-Azevedo, U.; Volkert, D. Texture modified diet in German nursing homes: Availability, best practices and association with nursing home characteristics. BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rodrigues-Fisher, L.; Bourguignon, C.; Good, B.V. Dietary fiber nursing intervention: Prevention of constipation in older adults. Clin. Nurs. Res. 1993, 2, 464–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cruz-Jentoft, A.; Calvo, J.; Durán, J.; Ordóñez, J.; De Castellar, R. Compliance with an oral hyperproteic supplement with fibre in nursing home residents. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2008, 12, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vucea, V.; Keller, H.H.; Morrison, J.M.; Duncan, A.M.; Duizer, L.M.; Lengyel, C.O.; Slaughter, S.E. Intake and factors associated with consumption of pureed food in long term care: An analysis of Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) project. J. Nutr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2018, 37, 59–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hubbard, G.P.; Elia, M.; Holdoway, A.; Stratton, R.J. A systematic review of compliance to oral nutritional supplements. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 31, 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chang, E.; Brownhill, S.; Bidewell, J.; Johnson, A.; Ratnayake, S. Focus on feeding! Evaluation of a framework for maximizing mealtime in aged care facilities. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2015, 21, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. De Sá, J.S.M.; Moreira, D.C.F.; Louvera Silva, K.A.; Morgano, M.A.; Quintaes, K.D.K.D. Consumption of oral hospital diets and percent adequacy of minerals in oncology patients as an indicative for the use of oral supplements. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Morilla-Herrera, J.C.; Martín-Santos, F.J.; Caro-Bautista, J.; Saucedo-Figueredo, C.; García-Mayor, S.; Morales-Asencio, J.M. Effectiveness of food-based fortification in older people a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2016, 20, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peladic, N.J.; Orlandoni, P.; Dell’Aquila, G.; Carrieri, B.; Eusebi, P.; Landi, F.; Volpato, S.; Zuliani, G.; Lattanzio, F.; Cherubini, A. Dysphagia in nursing home residents: Management and outcomes. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019, 20, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chatindiara, I.; Allen, J.; Hettige, D.; Senior, S.; Richter, M.; Kruger, M.; Wham, C. High prevalence of malnutrition and frailty among older adults at admission to residential aged care. J. Prim. Health Care 2020, 12, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Popman, A.; Richter, M.; Allen, J.; Wham, C. High nutrition risk is associated with higher risk of dysphagia in advanced age adults newly admitted to hospital. Nutr. Diet. 2018, 75, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Miles, A.; Dennison, K.; Amer Oad, M.; Shasha, L.; Royal, M. Consumer satisfaction of texture modified meals served in residential aged-care facilities. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. Res. 2019, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Milne, A.C.; Potter, J.; Vivanti, A.; Avenell, A. Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ollero, A.; Cruz-jentoft, A.J. Results of high-protein, high-calorie oral nutritional supplementation in malnourished older people in nursing homes: An observational, multicenter, prospective, pragmatic study. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2021, 22, 1919–1926.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Carrier, N.; West, G.E.; Ouellet, D. Dining experience, foodservices and staffing are associated with quality of life in elderly nursing home residents. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2009, 13, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, Y.; Oh, S.; Chang, H.; Bang, H.L. Effects of the evidence-based nursing care algorithm of dysphagia for nursing home residents. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2015, 41, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brook, S. The dysphagia diet: Maintaining adequate nutrition. Nurs. Resid. Care 2015, 17, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Residents’ characteristics associated with and without oral nutritional supplements.
Table 1. Residents’ characteristics associated with and without oral nutritional supplements.
Resident CharacteristicsTotalTMDs with ONSTMDs without ONSp-Value
Number of residents % (n)100% (85)54% (46)46% (39)
Age (years), median (IQR)88 (81, 91)88 (80, 90)89 (83, 93)0.27
Gender % (n) 0.11
Female68% (58)76% (35)59% (23)
Male32% (27)24% (11)41% (16)
Ethnicity % (n) x2 (4) = 4.25 p = 0.37
NZ European48% (41)43% (20)54% (21)
Other European33% (28)39% (18)26% (10)
Asian8% (7)11% (5)5% (2)
Pacific and Maori6% (5)4% (2)8% (3)
Indian and Middle Eastern5% (4)2% (1)8% (3)
Level of Care % (n) x2 (2) = 0.94, p = 0.62
Hospital82% (70)80% (37)85% (33)
Rest home17% (14)17% (8)15% (6)
Dementia1% (1)2% (1)-
Average length of stay (months), median (IQR)35.0 (18.5, 520)38.5 (19.8, 58.5)34.0 (17.0, 50.0)0.39
Mobility level % (n) x2 (2) = 0.84, p = 0.66
Mobile26% (22)24% (11)28% (11)
Semi-mobile31% (26)35% (16)26% (10)
Immobile44% (37)41% (19)46% (18)
Medical Condition % (n) x2 (13) = 18.0, p = 0.16
Arthritis22% (19)26% (12)18% (7)0.44
Brain injury6% (5)4% (2)8% (3)0.66
Cardiovascular conditions39% (33)37% (17)41% (16)0.82
Diabetes *15% (13)11% (5)21% (8)0.002
Dementia60% (51)61% (28)59% (23)>0.99
Depression or anxiety21% (18)20% (9)23% (9)0.79
Hypertension44% (37)39% (18)49% (19)0.39
Huntington’s Disease1% (1)2% (1)0% (0)>0.99
Gastrointestinal conditions19% (16)11% (5)28% (11)0.05
Osteoporosis15% (13)17% (8)13% (5)0.76
Pulmonary conditions9% (8)13% (6)5% (2)0.28
Parkinson’s Disease5% (4)7% (3)3% (1)0.62
Stroke *8% (7)2% (1)15% (6)0.04
Thyroid Dysfunction *21% (18)30% (14)10% (4)0.03
Reason requiring TMD % (n) x2 (3) = 1.64, p = 0.65
Swallowing difficulties44% (37)41% (19)46% (18)
Chewing difficulties27% (23)24% (11)31% (12)
Dementia27% (23)33% (15)21% (8)
Others (vision or tolerance)2% (2)2% (1)3% (1)
Level of TMDs prescribed % (n) * x2 (2) = 6.89, p = 0.03
Soft and bite-sized41% (35)37% (17)46% (18)
Minced and Moist13% (11)22% (10)2% (1)
Pureed46% (39)41% (19)43% (20)
Thin Fluids % (n)74% (63)78% (36)69% (27)0.46
Thickened Fluids % (n) x2 (2) = 3.27, p = 0.19
Extremely thickened1% (1)0% (0)3% (1)
Moderately thickened8% (7)11% (5)5% (2)
Mildly thickened16% (14)11% (5)23% (9)
Feeding assistance % (n) x2 (2) = 1.70, p = 0.43
Full Assistance51% (43)57% (26)44% (17)
Partial Assistance (set-up)11% (9)11% (5)10% (4)
Independent39% (33)33% (15)46% (18)
Note: ONS = Oral Nutritional Supplement; TMD = Texture-Modified Diet; Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact tests were conducted to test the significance between the two groups. * p < 0.05 is considered significant.
Table
Table 2. Average (SD) daily nutrition intake and requirement of residents consuming texture-modified diets with and without oral nutritional supplements.
Table 2. Average (SD) daily nutrition intake and requirement of residents consuming texture-modified diets with and without oral nutritional supplements.
^ RDI (>70 yr)All TMDs
n = 85		TMDs with ONS
n = 46		TMDs without ONS
n = 39		p-Value
Energy (kcal)1620 (229)1378 (473)1554 (1324, 1821)1155 (869, 1329)<0.0001
Protein (g)55 (44, 65)59 (44, 72)63 (53, 81)46 (38, 63)<0.0001
Carbohydrates (g)182–263154 (57)179 (57)126 (42)<0.0001
Fat (g)36–6350 (39, 63)55 (44, 65)41 (32, 61)0.02
Saturated fat (g)14–1822 (15, 28)23 (17, 29)20 (13, 28)0.43
Fibre (g)25 (Female)
30 (Male) *		13 (11, 17)13 (10, 17)12 (11, 17)0.94
Sodium (mg)2000 *1560 (606)1640 (667)1467 (519)0.18
Note: Normally distributed variables are presented as mean (standard deviation) and non-normally distributed variables are presented as median (interquartile range 25%, 75%). RDI = Recommended Dietary Intake (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2006); TMD = Texture-Modified Diet; ONS = Oral Nutritional Supplement; Welch’s t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used to test the significance between TMDs with ONS and TMDs without ONS. p < 0.05 is considered significant; ^ RDI for energy and protein was calculated for individual participants and presented as mean value (SD); Carbohydrates and fat intake was calculated with their contribution to total dietary energy using their lower end of recommended intake range. Carbohydrates = 45–65% energy; Fat = 20–35% energy; Saturated fat < 8–10% energy; * Adequate intake value was used for fibre and sodium recommendations.
Table
Table 3. Residents meeting the daily dietary recommendations with and without oral nutritional supplements.
Table 3. Residents meeting the daily dietary recommendations with and without oral nutritional supplements.
% of Residents Achieved Dietary Requirement (n)All TMDs
n = 85		TMDs with ONS
n = 46		TMDs without ONS
n = 39		p-Value
Energy35% (30)56% (26)10% (4)<0.0001
Protein72% (61)93% (43)46% (18)<0.0001
Carbohydrates39% (33)63% (29)10% (4)<0.0001
Fat76% (65)91% (42)59% (23)0.0007
Note: TMD = Texture-Modified Diet; ONS = Oral Nutritional Supplement; Fisher’s Exact tests were used to test the significance of percentage differences between TMDs with ONS and TMDs without ONS. p < 0.05 is considered significant.
Table
Table 4. Nutritional status of residents consuming texture-modified diets with and without oral nutritional supplements.
Table 4. Nutritional status of residents consuming texture-modified diets with and without oral nutritional supplements.
Total
(n = 85)		TMDs with ONS (n = 46)TMDs without ONS (n = 39)p-Value
Body weight (kg), mean (SD)56.3 (11.8)52.9 (9.9)60.4 (12.8)0.004
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)21.8 (4.1)20.2 (3.3)23.5 (4.2)0.0002
Decreased food intake % (n)42% (36)48% (22)36% (14)0.28
Weight loss in last 3 months % (n)53% (45)58% (27)46% (18)0.28
MNA-SF score, mean (SD)8.3 (2.9)7.4 (2.9)9.3 (2.6)0.005
Normal nutritional status % (n)14% (n = 12)7% (n = 3)23% (n = 9)χ2 (2) = 7.0, p = 0.03
At Risk of Malnutrition % (n)48% (n = 41)46% (n = 21)51% (n = 20)
Malnourished % (n)38% (n = 32)48% (n = 22)26% (n = 10)
Note: BMI = Body Mass Index; MNA-SF = Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-form; TMD = Texture-Modified Diet; ONS = Oral Nutritional Supplement. Nutritional status was categorised according to MNA-SF score: 12–14 = normal nutritional status; 8–11 = at risk of malnutrition; 0–7 = malnourished; Welch’s t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used to test the significance of weight, BMI and MNA-SF score between TMDs with ONS and TMDs without ONS. Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact tests were used to test the significance of decreased food intake, weight loss and distribution of nutritional status between groups. p < 0.05 is considered significant.
Table
Table 5. Predictors of total energy intake and body composition (MNA score or body weight).
Table 5. Predictors of total energy intake and body composition (MNA score or body weight).
Sum of SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean SquareFp-Value
Energy Intake
Regression93,042,160118,458,3782.6150.0072
Residual236,097,298733,234,210
Total329,139,45884
MNA-SF
Regression351.61035.167.475<0.0001
Residual348.1744.704
Total699.684
Model 1: Energy intake (kcal/day)Model 1: MNA-SF score
R-square = 0.28R-square = 0.50
CovariatesβSEtp-valueβSEtp-value
Age−28.0227.021.0370.303−0.080.0312.5720.012
Gender a393.4492.90.7980.427−0.430.5920.7220.472
Level of Care b−291.3541.20.5380.592−0.440.6500.6780.500
Length of stay3.006.190.4840.6300.0130.0071.7410.086
Mobility level c−151.5305.10.4970.621−0.660.3601.8380.070
Feeding assistance d124.4265.40.4690.641−0.810.3062.6600.0100
TMD level e276.0248.71.1090.2710.760.2872.6550.0100
Weight52.6333.391.5760.119−0.0150.0400.3630.717
BMI−195.6102.11.9150.0590.320.1182.6810.009
ONS f1659459.33.6130.0006−0.720.5481.3150.193
MNA-SF115.896.391.2010.234
Note: SE = Standard Error; BMI = Body Mass Index; MNA-SF = Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-form; TMD = Texture-Modified Diet; ONS = Oral Nutritional Supplement; Multiple linear regression analysis was used: Energy intake ~ Intercept + Age + Gender + Level of care + Length of stay + Mobility level + Feeding assistance + TMD level + Weight + BMI + MNA-SF + consumption of ONS; MNA-SF ~ Intercept + Age + Male + Level of care + Length of stay + Mobility level + Feeding assistance + TMD level + Weight + BMI + consumption of ONS; a Reference category = Female; b Reference category = Hospital level; c Reference category = Mobile; d Reference category = No feeding assistance; e Reference category = Level 4—pureed diet; f Reference category = No supplements.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, X.S.; Yousif, L.; Miles, A.; Braakhuis, A. A Comparison of Dietary Intake and Nutritional Status between Aged Care Residents Consuming Texture-Modified Diets with and without Oral Nutritional Supplements. Nutrients 2022, 14, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030669

AMA Style

Wu XS, Yousif L, Miles A, Braakhuis A. A Comparison of Dietary Intake and Nutritional Status between Aged Care Residents Consuming Texture-Modified Diets with and without Oral Nutritional Supplements. Nutrients. 2022; 14(3):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Xiaojing Sharon, Lina Yousif, Anna Miles, and Andrea Braakhuis. 2022. "A Comparison of Dietary Intake and Nutritional Status between Aged Care Residents Consuming Texture-Modified Diets with and without Oral Nutritional Supplements" Nutrients 14, no. 3: 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030669

APA Style

Wu, X. S., Yousif, L., Miles, A., & Braakhuis, A. (2022). A Comparison of Dietary Intake and Nutritional Status between Aged Care Residents Consuming Texture-Modified Diets with and without Oral Nutritional Supplements. Nutrients, 14(3), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop