Next Article in Journal
A Scoping Review: Urinary Markers of Metabolic Maturation in Preterm Infants and Future Interventions to Improve Growth
Next Article in Special Issue
The Diet Quality of Food-Insecure Australian Adults—A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Promotes Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Loss via Activating ROS-Dependent NF-κB Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Ukraine–Russia War Is Deepening Food Insecurity, Unhealthy Dietary Patterns and the Lack of Dietary Diversity in Lebanon: Prevalence, Correlates and Findings from a National Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Severity of Food Insecurity among Australian University Students, Professional and Academic Staff

Nutrients 2022, 14(19), 3956; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14193956
by Katherine Kent 1,2,*, Denis Visentin 1, Corey Peterson 3, Ian Ayre 3, Catherine Elliott 3, Carmen Primo 3 and Sandra Murray 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(19), 3956; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14193956
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 21 September 2022 / Published: 23 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In this study, a cross-sectional online survey in March 2022 aimed to characterize the severity of food insecurity in students, professional and academic staff at the University of Tasmania (UTAS). The topic is interesting. However, there are some problems in the study. The experiment design is too simple. Some important information is missing. For example, it is important to provide the number, age composition and gender of staff, and the number and gender of students in this survey.

In addition, it is important to provide the types of food and the types and source of unsafe food which are vital to food safety survey because it is meaningless to investigate food safety without knowing the specific types of unsafe food. Moreover, what is the basis for scores as having high (0), marginal (1), low (2 - 4) or very low food security (5 - 6)?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors are unwilling or unable to address my concerns sufficiently to make this manuscript suitable for publication.

Back to TopTop