Next Article in Journal
Dietary Quality during Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Defects
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Existence of Sarcopenia and Poor Recovery of Swallowing Function in Post-Stroke Patients with Severe Deglutition Disorder: A Multicenter Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Differences in Nutritional Intake, Total Body Fat, and BMI Score between Twins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationship between Nutrition-Related Problems and Falls in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/nu14173656
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Malnutrition Assessed by the GLIM Criteria and Association with Activities of Daily Living in Older Residents in an Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care

by
Yoji Kokura
1 and
Ryo Momosaki
2,*
1
Department of Nutritional Management, Keiju Hatogaoka Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care, Hosu 9270023, Japan
2
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 5148507, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(17), 3656; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173656
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 4 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rehabilitation Nutrition in Older People)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Malnutrition is associated with poor functional outcomes in residents in long-term care facilities. The integrated facility for medical and long-term care (IFMLC) is a new Japanese long-term care facility where medical services can be provided. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed based on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and its association with activities of daily living (ADL) in older residents in IFMLC. In this cross-sectional study of older residents, we diagnosed mild and severe malnutrition using the GLIM criteria and assessed ADLs using the Barthel index (BI). Multivariate regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between BI score and GLIM-defined malnutrition. A total of 117 older residents (84 women; median age, 88 years) were analyzed in this study. The prevalence values of mild and severe malnutrition were 29% and 18%, respectively. Multivariate analyses for the BI score after adjusting for potential confounders showed that mild and severe malnutrition were independently associated with BI score (B = −6.113, p < 0.046; B = −8.411, p = 0.015, respectively). GLIM-defined malnutrition is negatively associated with ADLs in older residents in IFMLC.

1. Introduction

Malnutrition is a common problem often seen in older people receiving care in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). A systematic review found that 12–54% of the older people admitted to LTCFs were malnourished [1]. Malnutrition was consistently associated with cognitive impairment, depression, swallowing difficulty, and functional impairment [2]. A greater body mass index (BMI) was associated with a lower chance of mortality, whereas malnutrition primarily affects mortality in nursing home patients [2]. Therefore, the early detection and treatment of malnutrition should be addressed to maximize the functional capacity and quality of life of older adults in LTCFs.
Japan is the most aged country worldwide, and the burden of long-term care is continuously increasing. People aged ≥ 65 years accounted for 28.8% of the total population in 2020, and that proportion is expected to reach a peak of approximately 40% in 2040–2050 [3]. The Japanese public long-term care insurance system established an integrated facility for medical and long-term care (IFMLC) in 2018 to meet the needs of older people requiring nursing care, chronic care, and both medical and nursing care [4]. The IFMLC combines (i) routine medical management, (ii) end-of-life care and terminal care functions, and (iii) functions as a living facility [4]. In 2020, the IFMLC had 515 facilities with 32,634 beds, with many older people requiring nursing care during admission [5]. Meanwhile, 36.7% of Japanese IFMLC residents had a Barthel index (BI) score of 0 points [5]. Furthermore, the average BI score improvement during admission is negative for most of them [5], indicating that activities of daily living (ADL) decline is a problem at IFMLC.
In IFMLC, the association between the prevalence of malnutrition assessed using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and ADLs is unclear. The prevalence of malnutrition in LTCFs ranges from 1.5% to 66.5%, but definitions of malnutrition vary [2]. To tackle the issue of malnutrition in LTCFs, a consistent definition was needed. As a framework for diagnosing malnutrition in adults, the GLIM developed a set of evidence-based criteria in 2018 [6]. A diagnosis can be verified by any combination of one phenotypic criterion and one etiologic criterion under the GLIM criteria, which is based on the evaluation of three phenotypic and two etiologic criteria [6]. Phenotypic criteria include BMI, with criteria for each race and age group. Studies have reported the association between GLIM criteria severity classification and prognosis using BMI cutoff values for the Asian population [7,8]. However, no study has used Asian population cutoff values of BMI for older people in IFMLCs. To evaluate the accuracy of the diagnosis of malnutrition, several patient groups and illness situations will require appropriately powered, methodologically sound validation studies employing the full GLIM criteria.
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed using the GLIM criteria and its association with ADLs in older residents in IFMLCs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This single-center study followed a retrospective cross-sectional design. The participating facility was the IFMLC Keiju Hatogawaka (Ishikawa, Japan), which provided rehabilitation services based on the Japanese insurance system. The study was conducted from 1 to 30 November 2021, and the study participants were people aged ≥ 65 years who were admitted to an IFMLC during the study period. All clinical data were obtained during the study period. Residents who died during the study period and data missing were excluded.

2.2. IFMLC

The basic policy of IFMLCs is to provide medical care management, nursing care, nursing care under medical supervision and other medical care, functional training, and daily living care to persons requiring long-term medical care based on the facility service plan [4]. In IFMLCs, various treatments, such as medications and tests, are performed based on a physician’s consultation. Terminal care is also performed. IFMLCs are equipped with examination rooms, treatment rooms, functional training rooms, clinical laboratories (where routine clinical tests can be performed on sputum, blood, urine, feces, etc.), X-ray imaging, and computed tomography [4]. Medical services include the management of enteral nutrition and total parenteral nutrition, sputum suctioning, oxygen therapy, tracheostomy care, ventilator management, insulin injections, and treatment of pressure ulcers [4]. The provision of medical services is a critical feature that distinguishes IFMLCs from other LTCFs.
The comprehensive team of an IFMLC is composed of physicians, care managers, care workers, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and registered dieticians. In IFMLCs, two full-time physical therapists and two full-time occupational therapists provide rehabilitation to residents. Rehabilitation consists of joint range of motion practice, basic movement practice, standing and walking training, ADL training, endurance practice, muscle strengthening practice, and a mental functioning approach. Within the first 3 months after admission, intensive rehabilitation is provided with the addition of short-term intensive rehabilitation.
In IFMLCs, one full-time registered dietitian provides nutrition care management. Nutrition care management is a Japanese long-term care insurance nutrition management method [9,10], and it includes nutrition assessment, nutrition care planning, and nutrition monitoring. On the basis of the nutrition care plan, the registered dietitian provides nutritional care, including the provision of appropriate food amounts and forms, nutritional counseling, and monitoring of nutritional intake and status to ensure that nutritional care is provided efficiently to each resident. Nutrition care is evaluated periodically for appropriateness, and changes are made to the nutrition care plan.

2.3. Data Collection

As part of routine evaluations, all clinical information was recorded. Relevant information was extracted from the medical records and retrospectively examined in this study. All clinical data were obtained during the study period. These data included the demographic characteristics of the participants (e.g., age and sex), affiliation before IFMLC admission, number of days spent at the IFMLC, primary diseases for facility admission, comorbidities, nursing care level (between 1 (mild) and 5 (severe) based on the assessment of care requirements) [11], weight loss before hospitalization, swallowing ability, nutritional status, muscle mass, rehabilitation dose (in minute/day) during the study period, and physical function. The effects of comorbidities were evaluated using the Charlson comorbidity index score [12], which was collected from electrical medical charts. The registered dietitian evaluated the swallowing ability using the Food Intake Level Scale (FILS) [13]. The FILS scores are based on the swallowing condition and can be scored subjectively, ranging from level 1 to level 10, with higher levels indicating greater swallowing ability. Levels 1–3, 4–6, and 7–10 indicate “no oral intake”, “oral intake and alternative nutrition”, and “oral intake alone”, respectively.

2.4. Malnutrition Assessment

The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) [14] was used for nutritional screening, and this was followed by an evaluation of malnutrition using the GLIM diagnostic criteria [6]. MUST has three ratings: acute sickness, weight loss, and BMI; the total scores range from 0 to 6 [14]. Low, medium, and high risk of malnutrition are indicated by scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Hence, in this study, malnutrition was considered a risk with a MUST score of 1. The three steps of the GLIM criteria are as follows: first, patients at risk for malnutrition are identified using an established nutritional risk screening tool; second, malnutrition is identified in at-risk patients by identifying at least one phenotypic and one etiologic criterion; and third, the severity of malnutrition is assessed based on the phenotypic criterion.
First, in all patients, weight loss (≥5% weight loss in the previous 6 months and ≥10% weight loss in >6 months), a low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2 in patients aged < 70 years and <20.0 kg/m2 in patients aged ≥ 70 years), and reduced muscle mass (calf circumference (CC) < 34 cm in men and <33 cm in women) were employed to evaluate the phenotypic criteria. Weight loss was assessed using monthly weight measurements by nursing staff and caregivers using calibrated scales that allowed measurements while in a wheelchair. Data on weight loss in the past 6 months before admission were obtained by interviewing hospital staff, patients, or family members. BMI was calculated by dividing the body weight by the height squared (kg/m2). The cutoff value of the CC was taken from the sarcopenia diagnostic criteria for Asian populations [15], i.e., <34 cm for men and <33 cm for women, as assessed with dual-energy absorptiometry or corresponding standards evaluating other body composition measurements, such as bioelectrical impedance analysis. In this study context, CT and MRI were not accessible [6]. Registered dietitians measured anthropometric values on the nondominant or nonparalysed limb in the supine position. With the feet and ankles relaxed and the knee bent to 90 degrees, the biggest CC was measured using a regular measuring tape in 0.1-cm intervals.
Second, in all patients, reduced food intake (<50% of energy requirements for >1 week or any reduction for >2 weeks), assimilation problems (e.g., dysphagia, vomiting, and diarrhea), and disease burden/inflammatory condition (e.g., congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and cancer) were used to evaluate the etiologic criteria. Estimated energy requirements were established based on the activity level of each resident and the Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese (2020) [16]. The energy adequacy ratio was calculated by dividing the mean energy intake by the estimated energy requirement. Food intake observed during the study period was obtained from residents’ medical charts. Using a visual estimating approach, nurses evaluated the quantity of food intake [17], and qualified dietitians further estimated the amount of nutritional intake.
Finally, malnutrition was classified as severe in individuals with at least one of the following: severe weight loss (>10% weight loss in the previous 6 months or >20% weight loss in >6 months), severely low BMI, and severely reduced muscle mass (CC < 24 cm in men and <21.4 cm in women). Patients were diagnosed with severe malnutrition (BMI < 17.0 and <17.8 for patients aged <70 and aged ≥70 years, respectively) based on the cutoff values reported previously for Asians [7]. Due to the lack of clear cutoffs for substantially reduced muscle mass, prior studies in Japan [18,19,20] were used to define severely reduced skeletal muscle mass as 4 standard deviations below the mean of healthy adolescents. Each step of the GLIM process, including the MUST, was performed by certified, trained, and registered dietitians.

2.5. Outcome Measurement

The outcome was measured by determining independence in performing ADLs using BI [21]. The total value of the ten items in BI ranges from 0 to 100, and include feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel incontinence, bladder incontinence, toilet use, transfers, mobility, and stairs. The degrees of functional ability for each BI category fall in a range, with the greatest values signifying complete independence and lower BI scores suggesting less physical function.

2.6. Sample Size Calculation

The standard deviation of the BI for older patients in nursing homes in Japan was 28.5 in a previous study [22]. At a statistical power of 0.8, it takes 64 participants to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the two groups are identical, even if the real difference between the means of the malnutrition and nonmalnutrition groups is 10. With this null hypothesis test, the likelihood of a type I error is 0.05. Therefore, we planned to examine >128 participants in the study.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages); parametric variables, as means ± standard deviation; and nonparametric variables, as medians (interquartile ranges (IQR), 25–75 percentile). The background characteristics for malnutrition using the GLIM criteria were compared using the chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t-test, and Mann–Whitney U test. For BI over the study period, correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The factors that were independently related to BI were determined using a multivariate linear regression analysis. The covariates that were selected to adjust for bias were age, sex, primary diseases for facility admission, and the estimated time of rehabilitation dose [23,24,25,26,27]. Using the variance inflation factor (VIF) coefficient, multicollinearity was assessed. The multivariable analysis did not include a covariate if its VIF was less than 2. p-values of <0.05 were considered significant. JMP 11.2.1 software was used to conduct statistical analysis (SAS Japan, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results

A total of 126 residents fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, two died during the study period, and seven had missing data, which were excluded. Finally, there were 117 participants in total (33 men and 84 women, with an average age of 88 years) (Figure 1). The median number of days spent in IFMLCs was 483 (IQR: 207–1175) days.
The characteristics of the participants at the time of the survey are shown in Table 1. During the survey period, 34 (29%) residents were classified into the mild malnutrition group, and 83 were classified into the nonmalnutrition group. Moreover, 21 (18%) residents were classified into the severe malnutrition group, and 96 were classified into the nonmalnutrition group. A comparison of the proportion of affiliation before IFMLC admission between mild and severe malnutrition and nonmild and nonsevere malnutrition groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.709). In addition, a comparison of the proportion between the severe malnutrition and nonsevere malnutrition groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.445). A comparison of the proportion of primary diseases at IFMLC admission between the mild and severe malnutrition and nonmild and nonsevere malnutrition groups revealed a significant difference (p = 0.001). The most common affiliation before IFMLC admission for both the mild and severe malnutrition groups was a hospital. Moreover, a comparison of the proportion between the severe malnutrition and nonsevere malnutrition groups showed a significant difference (p = 0.022). The mild and severe malnutrition groups had a significantly higher proportion of dementia and heart failure than the nonmalnutrition group. The mild and severe malnutrition group had a significantly higher proportion of dysphagia than the nonmild and nonsevere malnutrition group (p = 0.016). The severe malnutrition group had a significantly lower BMI, higher proportion of the high risk of MUST, and more dysphagia than the nonsevere malnutrition group (all p < 0.05).
Table 2 indicates the nutritional characteristics based on the GLIM components in the malnutrition and nonmalnutrition groups and the BI. The prevalence of reduced food intake or assimilation disease burden/inflammation was significantly higher in the mild and severe malnutrition groups than in the nonmalnutrition group, respectively. No differences were found in the BI between the mild and severe malnutrition groups and the nonmalnutrition group.
The univariate analysis revealed no significant difference in the BI between the groups according to sex and primary diseases for facility admission (Table 3). The correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between BI and CCI (ρ = −0.195; p = 0.035) and estimated time of rehabilitation dose (ρ = 0.341; p < 0.001). Table 4 shows the results of the multivariate linear regression analyses for BI after adjusting for potential covariates.
The variables did not exhibit any multicollinearity. The multivariate analyses showed that GLIM-defined mild malnutrition (B = −6.113; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −12.129 to −0.098, p = 0.046) was independently associated with BI. GLIM-defined severe malnutrition (B = −8.411; 95% CI = −15.137 to −1.684, p = 0.015) was also independently associated with BI (Table 4).

4. Discussion

We conducted a cross-sectional study of geriatric IFMLC residents to determine the prevalence of malnutrition assessed by the GLIM criteria or its relationship with ADLs. Two important findings from the study were related to nutritional support for older IFMLC residents. First, the prevalence values of mild and severe malnutrition were 29% and 18%, respectively. Second, GLIM-defined mild and severe malnutrition were associated with ADL. To our knowledge, this study is the first to mention the prevalence of GLIM-defined malnutrition in older residents in IFMLC or its association with ADLs.
In this study, the prevalence values of mild and severe malnutrition were 29% and 18%, respectively. In previous studies, the prevalence values of older people with GLIM-defined malnutrition in hospitals, rehabilitation facilities, nursing homes, and communities assessed were 16.3–46% [28,29], 52–66.9% [30,31], 10.5–17% [32,33], and 12.6%–24.4%, respectively [34,35]. Thus, IFMLCs may have similar or greater malnutrition than nursing homes. The mild and severe malnutrition groups had a significantly higher proportion of dementia, heart failure, and EN than the nonmalnutrition group. Dementia reflects high rates of dysphagia, and dysphagia is associated with nutritional deficits [36]. In addition, the mild and severe malnutrition groups had a significantly higher proportion of reduced food intake or assimilation than the nonmalnutrition group. EN among older people in LTCFs does not increase nutrient absorption to improve nutritional status [37]. Therefore, dysphagia likely made oral intake difficult, resulting in reduced food intake and, thus, low nutritional status. In addition, heart failure can cause inflammation [38]. Because patients with chronic diseases from hospitals are admitted to IFMLCs, where healthcare services are available, malnutrition is highly likely to be caused by invasion and inflammation due to chronic diseases. Therefore, starvation and inflammation appear to be the causes of malnutrition in IFMLC residents.
GLIM-diagnosed mild and severe malnutrition were associated with ADLs. A study reported the relationship between malnutrition and decreased functionality in older adults undergoing rehabilitation [39]. Specifically, GLIM-defined malnutrition was found to be associated with decreased physical performance in patients with cardiovascular disease [40], dementia [41], and stroke [42]. The results of the present study support these previous findings. The severe malnutrition group had a significantly higher proportion of low BMI and reduced muscle mass than the nonmalnutrition group. Sarcopenia, including muscle mass reduction, is more likely to occur in nursing homes, where people spend more time in bed and are often unable to choose what they eat, compared with community residents who are physically active and can choose their food [23]. Low muscle mass was associated with worsening ADLs [43]. Furthermore, CC was found to be significantly correlated with physical function [44]. Therefore, the finding that GLIM-defined severe malnutrition, including loss of muscle mass, is associated with decreased ADLs is reasonable. IFMLCs require improvement of malnutrition, including loss of muscle mass.
Rehabilitation nutrition practices may be effective in improving malnutrition in IFMLCs. It is defined as the combination of rehabilitation and nutrition care [45]. In this concept, nutritional management and rehabilitation are combined using the International Classification Guidelines on Dysfunction and Health to allow the patients to perform body functions, participate in activities, and achieve a quality of life by improving nutritional status, sarcopenia, and frailty. Enhanced nutritional care was weakly recommended for patients receiving rehabilitation for hip fractures and cerebrovascular disease to improve ADL [46]. Additionally, dietary supplements, giving residents more control over meal choices, and staff training programs were effective approaches to lower malnutrition in nursing homes [2]. Therefore, rehabilitation nutrition practices are recommended for patients in IFMLCs with malnutrition and decreased ADLs.
This study has several limitations. First, a causal relationship between malnutrition and reduced ADLs was unclear owing to the study design. The causal relationship between malnutrition and decreased ADLs must therefore be clarified through additional longitudinal research. Second, the outcomes of this observational study may not be as broadly applicable because it was restricted to a single IFMLC. Third, the small number of participants weakened the statistical power of this study. Thus, to overcome this limitation, multicenter prospective studies with a higher sample size are required.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the prevalence values of mild and severe malnutrition were 29% and 18%, respectively, in older patients in IFMLCs. The severe malnutrition group had a significantly higher proportion of low BMI and reduced muscle mass than the nonmalnutrition group. Starvation and inflammation appeared to be the causes of malnutrition in IFMLC residents. Furthermore, GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition was independently associated with ADLs in this population. Therefore, we suggest assessing malnutrition with a disability early and managing all IFMLC residents properly. Rehabilitation nutrition practices are recommended for patients in IFMLCs with malnutrition and decreased ADLs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.K. and R.M.; methodology, Y.K. and R.M.; software, Y.K.; validation, Y.K. and R.M.; formal analysis, Y.K.; investigation, Y.K.; data curation, Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.K. and R.M.; supervision, R.M.; project administration, R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22H03311.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Tosenkai Nursing Facility Ethics Committee (ID. 2022–01).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived, as this study only relied on the anonymized data from daily clinical practice. We provided an opt-out option to allow residents to withdraw their participation from this study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Masatoshi Miyamoto and the staff of the IFMLC Keiju Hatogaoka for their advice and expertise regarding this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Namasivayam, A.M.; Steele, C.M. Malnutrition and dysphagia in long-term care: A systematic review. J. Nutr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2015, 34, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bell, C.L.; Lee, A.S.W.; Tamura, B.K. Malnutrition in the nursing home. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2015, 18, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Annual Report on the Ageing Society [Summary] FY2021. Cabinet Office Japan. 2021. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/annualreport/2021/pdf/2021.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  4. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Overview of Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care. 2018. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000196478.html (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  5. Social Security Council, Subcommittee on Long-Term Care Benefit Expenses. Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care. 2020. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12300000/000672495.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  6. Cederholm, T.; Barazzoni, R.; Austin, P.; Ballmer, P.; Biolo, G.; Bischoff, S.C.; Compher, C.; Correia, I.; Higashiguchi, T.; Holst, M.; et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 36, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Maeda, K.; Ishida, Y.; Nonogaki, T.; Mori, N. Reference body mass index values and the prevalence of malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shimizu, A.; Maeda, K.; Wakabayashi, H.; Nishioka, S.; Nagano, A.; Kayashita, J.; Fujishima, I.; Momosaki, R. Predictive validity of body mass index cutoff values used in the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria for discriminating severe and moderate malnutrition based on in-patients with pneumonia in Asians. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2021, 45, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sugiyama, M.; Miyamotom, K. Nutrition care management cycle. Surg. Front. 2009, 16, 230–233. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Overview of Nutrition Care Management. No 0907002. 2005. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/kaigo/housyu/dl/c23.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  11. Tsutsui, T.; Muramatsu, N. Care-needs certification in the long-term care insurance system of Japan. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic. Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kunieda, K.; Ohno, T.; Fujishima, I.; Hojo, K.; Morita, T. Reliability and validity of a tool to measure the severity of dysphagia: The Food Intake LEVEL Scale. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2013, 46, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malnutrition Action Group (MAG). The “MUST” Explanatory Booklet. Available online: http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/must/must_explan.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  15. Chen, L.K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, Y.W.; Chou, M.Y.; Iijima, K.; Jang, H.C.; Kang, L.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Asian Working Group for sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Overview of the Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese (2020). 2020. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10900000/000862500.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  17. Kawasaki, Y.; Sakai, M.; Nishimura, K.; Fujiwara, K.; Fujisaki, K.; Shimpo, M.; Akamatsu, R. Criterion validity of the visual estimation method for determining patients’ meal intake in a community hospital. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 1543–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kinoshita, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Kajii, Y.; Satonaka, A.; Suzuki, N. Calf circumference positively correlates with calf muscle thickness and negatively correlates with calf subcutaneous fat thickness and percent body fat in non-obese healthy young adults. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2022, 62, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tanimoto, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Sun, W.; Hirota, C.; Sugiura, Y.; Kono, R.; Saito, M.; Kono, K. Association between muscle mass and disability in performing Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in community-dwelling elderly in Japan. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2012, 54, e230–e233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nishioka, S.; Matsushita, T.; Yamanouchi, A.; Okazaki, Y.; Oishi, K.; Nishioka, E.; Mori, N.; Tokunaga, Y.; Onizuka, S. Prevalence and associated factors of coexistence of malnutrition and sarcopenia in geriatric rehabilitation. Nutrients 2021, 23, 3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Collin, C.; Wade, D.T.; Davies, S.; Horne, V. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. Int. Disabil. Stud. 1988, 10, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mikami, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Edahiro, A.; Motokawa, K.; Shirobe, M.; Yasuda, J.; Murakami, M.; Murakami, K.; Taniguchi, Y.; Furuya, J.; et al. Relationship between mortality and Council of Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire scores in Japanese nursing home residents. Nutrition 2019, 57, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yeom, H.A.; Fleury, J.; Keller, C. Risk factors for mobility limitation in community-dwelling older adults: A social ecological perspective. Geriatr. Nurs. 2008, 29, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kelly-Hayes, M.; Beiser, A.; Kase, C.S.; Scaramucci, A.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Wolf, P.A. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: The Framingham study. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2003, 12, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Taylor, M.E.; Close, J.C.T. Dementia. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018, 159, 303–321. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fuentes-Abolafio, I.J.; Stubbs, B.; Pérez-Belmonte, L.M.; Bernal-López, M.R.; Gómez-Huelgas, R.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Physical functional performance and prognosis in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2020, 9, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Karssemeijer, E.G.A.; Aaronson, J.A.; Bossers, B.J.; Smits, T.; Rikkert, M.G.M.O.; Kessels, R.P.C. Positive effects of combined cognitive and physical exercise training on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 40, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sanz-París, A.; Martín-Palmero, A.; Gomez-Candela, C.; García-Almeida, J.M.; Burgos-Pelaez, R.; Sanz-Arque, A.; Espina, S.; Arbones-Mainar, J.M.; Study VIDA group. GLIM Criteria at hospital admission predict 8-year all-cause mortality in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from VIDA Study. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2020, 44, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bellanti, F.; Buglio, A.L.; Quiete, S.; Pellegrino, G.; Dobrakowski, M.; Kasperczyk, A.; Kasperczyk, S.; Vendemiale, G. Comparison of three nutritional screening tools with the new glim criteria for malnutrition and association with sarcopenia in hospitalized older patients. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 17, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Clark, A.B.; Reijnierse, E.M.; Lim, W.K.; Maier, A.B. Prevalence of malnutrition comparing the GLIM criteria, ESPEN definition and MST malnutrition risk in geriatric rehabilitation patients: RESORT. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 3504–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shimizu, A.; Maeda, K.; Honda, T.; Ishida, Y.; Ueshima, J.; Nagami, S.; Nagano, A.; Inoue, T.; Murotani, K.; Kayashita, J.; et al. Comparison between the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism definitions for the prevalence of malnutrition in geriatric rehabilitation care. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2020, 20, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Faxén-Irving, G.; Luiking, Y.; Grönstedt, H.; Franzén, E.; Seiger, Å.; Vikström, S.; Wimo, A.; Boström, A.M.; Cederholm, T. Do malnutrition, sarcopenia and frailty overlap in nursing-home residents? J. Frailty Aging 2021, 10, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sanz-Paris, A.; Fernández, M.G.; Perez-Noguera, J.; Serrano-Oliver, A.; Torres-Anoro, E.; Sanz-Arque, A.; Arbones-Mainar, J.M. Prevalence of malnutrition and 1-year all-cause mortality in institutionalized elderly patients comparing different combinations of the GLIM criteria. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2021, 45, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rodríguez-Mañas, L.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, B.; Carnicero, J.A.; Rueda, R.; García-Garcia, F.J.; Pereira, S.L.; Sulo, S. Impact of nutritional status according to GLIM criteria on the risk of incident frailty and mortality in community-dwelling older adults. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 1192–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sanchez-Rodriguez, D.; Locquet, M.; Bruyère, O.; Lengelé, L.; Cavalier, E.; Reginster, J.Y.; Beaudart, C. Prediction of 5-year mortality risk by malnutrition according to the GLIM format using seven pragmatic approaches to define the criterion of loss of muscle mass. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sura, L.; Madhavan, A.; Carnaby, G.; Crary, M.A. Dysphagia in the elderly: Management and nutritional considerations. Clin. Interv. Aging 2012, 7, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Lan, S.H.; Lu, L.C.; Yen, Y.Y.; Hsieh, Y.P.; Chen, J.C.; Wu, W.J.; Lan, S.J.; Lin, L.Y. Tube feeding among elder in long-term care facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2017, 21, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rahman, A.; Jafry, S.; Jeejeebhoy, K.; Nagpal, A.D.; Pisani, B.; Agarwala, R. Malnutrition and cachexia in heart failure. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2016, 40, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wojzischke, J.; Van Wijngaarden, J.; Van den Berg, C.; Cetinyurek-Yavuz, A.; Diekmann, R.; Luiking, Y.; Bauer, J. Nutritional status and functionality in geriatric rehabilitation patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2020, 11, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kootaka, Y.; Kamiya, K.; Hamazaki, N.; Nozaki, K.; Ichikawa, T.; Nakamura, T.; Yamashita, M.; Maekawa, E.; Reed, J.L.; Yamaoka-Tojo, M.; et al. The GLIM criteria for defining malnutrition can predict physical function and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Borda, M.G.; Copete, A.M.A.; Tovar-Rios, D.A.; Jaramillo-Jimenez, A.; Giil, L.M.; Soennesyn, H.; Gómez-Arteaga, C.; Venegas-Sanabria, L.C.; Kristiansen, I.; Chavarro-Carvajal, D.A.; et al. Association of malnutrition with functional and cognitive trajectories in people living with dementia: A five-year follow-up study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2021, 79, 1713–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nozoe, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Masuya, R.; Inoue, T.; Kubo, H.; Shimada, S. Prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed with GLIM criteria and association with activities of daily living in patients with acute stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2021, 30, 105989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, D.X.M.; Yao, J.; Zirek, Y.; Reijnierse, E.M.; Maier, A.B. Muscle mass, strength, and physical performance predicting activities of daily living: A meta-analysis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020, 11, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lin, S.J.; Hwang, S.J.; Liu, C.Y.; Lin, H.R. The relationship between nutritional status and physical function, admission frequency, length of hospital stay, and mortality in old people living in long-term care facilities. J. Nurs. Res. 2012, 20, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wakabayashi, H. Rehabilitation nutrition in general and family medicine. J. Gen. Fam. Med. 2017, 18, 153–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nishioka, S.; Aragane, H.; Suzuki, N.; Yoshimura, Y.; Fujiwara, D.; Mori, T.; Kanehisa, Y.; Iida, Y.; Higashi, K.; Yoshimura-Yokoi, Y.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation nutrition in cerebrovascular disease, hip fracture, cancer, and acute illness: 2020 update. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 43, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 14 03656 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study participants. The study analyzed 117 participants.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study participants. The study analyzed 117 participants.
Nutrients 14 03656 g001
Table
Table 1. Resident characteristics during the survey period.
Table 1. Resident characteristics during the survey period.
CharacteristicsAll
(117)		Mild and Severe Malnutrition (34)Nonmild and Nonsevere Malnutrition (83)p-ValueSevere Malnutrition (21)Nonsevere Malnutrition (96)p-Value
Age (year), median (IQR)88 (84–92)89 (86–93)87 (81–92)0.120 (a)88 (86–93)88 (82–92)0.495 (a)
Sex (female), n (%)84 (72)23 (68)61 (74)0.651 (b)15 (71)69 (72)1.000 (b)
Affiliation before IFMLC admission, n (%) 0.709 (b) 0.445 (b)
Hospital86 (74)24 (70)62 (74) 14 (67)72 (75)
Nursing home13 (11)5 (15)8 (10) 4 (19)9 (9)
Home18 (15)5 (15)13 (16) 3 (14)15 (16)
Spent at IFMLC, (days), median (IQR)483 (207–1175)416 (166–1004)558 (211–1255)0.189 (a)611 (230–1146)479 (205–1179)0.966 (a)
Primary diseases for IFMLC admission, n (%) 0.001 (b) 0.022 (b)
Cerebrovascular disease55 (47)9 (26)46 (56) 8 (27)47 (54)
Dementia32 (27)12 (35)20 (24) 11 (37)21 (24)
Orthopedic diseases9 (8)4 (12)5 (6) 4 (13)5 (6)
Heart failure9 (8)7 (21)2 (2) 5 (17)4 (5)
Other diseases12 (10)2 (6)10 (12) 2 (6)10 (11)
Nursing care level, n (%) 0.483 (b) 0.467 (b)
110 (8)1 (3)9 (11) 0 (0)10 (10)
219 (16)5 (15)14 (17) 2 (10)17 (18)
318 (15)6 (18)12 (14) 4 (19)14 (15)
434 (30)13 (38)21 (25) 8 (38)26 (27)
536 (31)9 (26)27 (33) 7 (33)29 (30)
CCI, (points), median (IQR)2 (1–3)2 (2–3)2 (1–3)0.130 (a)2 (2–3)2 (1–3)0.411 (a)
BMI, (kg/m2), median (IQR)19 (17–21)17 (16–21)19 (17–21)0.148 (a)17 (16–17)19 (17–22)<0.001 (a)
MUST, n (%) 0.103 (b) <0.001 (b)
Low risk22 (19)5 (15)17 (20) 0 (0)22 (23)
Medium risk22 (19)3 (9)19 (23) 0 (0)22 (23)
High risk73 (62)26 (76)47 (57) 21 (100)52 (54)
Dysphagia severity, n (%) 0.016 (b) <0.001 (b)
Complete EN 1 20 (17)5 (14)15 (18) 4 (19)16 (17)
Oral intake with EN 26 (5)5 (15)1 (1) 5 (24)1 (1)
Oral intake without EN 391 (78)24 (71)67 (81) 12 (57)79 (82)
Estimated time of rehabilitation dose (minute/day), median (IQR)9 (9–11)9 (9–11)11 (9–11)0.678 (a)11 (9–11)9 (9–11)0.997 (a)
(a) Mann–Whitney U test and (b) Fisher’s exact test. IQR, interquartile range; IFMLC, integrated facility for medical and long-term care; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; BMI, body mass index; MUST, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool; EN, enteral nutrition. 1 Identified by Food Intake Level Scale 1–3. 2 Identified by Food Intake Level Scale 4–6. 3 Identified by Food Intake Level Scale 7–10.
Table
Table 2. Nutritional characteristics based on the GLIM components in residents with and without malnutrition and the Barthel index.
Table 2. Nutritional characteristics based on the GLIM components in residents with and without malnutrition and the Barthel index.
CharacteristicsMild and Severe Malnutrition (34)Nonmild and Nonsevere Malnutrition (83)p-ValueSevere Malnutrition (21)Nonsevere Malnutrition (96)p-Value
Phenotypic criteria, presence, n (%)
Weight loss9 (26)21 (25)1.000 (a)3 (14)6 (6)0.203 (a)
Low BMI by GLIM24 (71)55 (66)0.650 (b)19 (90)31 (32)<0.001 (a)
Reduced muscle mass34 (100)80 (96)0.555 (a)8 (38)7 (7)<0.001 (a)
Etiologic criteria, presence, n (%)
Reduced food intake or assimilation5 (15)0 (0)0.002 (a)3 (14)2 (2)0.040 (a)
Disease burden/inflammation32 (94)1 (1)<0.001 (a)19 (90)14 (15)<0.001 (a)
Barthel Index (points), median (IQR)13 (0–51)15 (0–55)0.672 (c)10 (0–38)15 (0–55)0.159 (c)
(a) Fisher’s exact test, (b) chi-squared test, and (c) Mann–Whitney U test. BMI, body mass index; GLIM, Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition; IQR, interquartile range.
Table
Table 3. Univariate analysis of the Barthel index.
Table 3. Univariate analysis of the Barthel index.
CharacteristicsBarthel Index, Median (IQR)p-Value
Sex
Male20 (5–58)0.122 (a)
Female10 (0–50)
Primary diseases for facility admission
Cerebrovascular disease 10 (0–25)0.06 (b)
Dementia15 (5–55)
Orthopedic diseases50 (13–70)
Heart failure55 (10–75)
Other diseases10 (0–35)
(a) Mann–Whitney U test and (b) Kruskal–Wallis test. IQR, interquartile range.
Table
Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis of the Barthel index.
Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis of the Barthel index.
Factorp-ValueΒ95% CIp-ValueΒ95% CI
Age0.3010.339−0.307 to 0.9860.4030.270−0.367 to 0.907
Sex, female0.064−5.620−11.577 to 0.3370.070−5.430−11.309 to 0.447
Primary diseases for facility admission
Cerebrovascular diseaseReference Reference
Dementia0.555−2.998−13.045 to 7.0490.797−1.306−11.363 to 8.751
Orthopedic diseases0.06014.592−0.949 to 30.1330.04415.9350.472 to 31.399
Heart failure0.06015.415−0.666 to 31.4960.16610.773−4.549 to 26.095
Other diseases0.040−14.262−28.131 to −0.3930.069−12.552−26.074 to 0.970
Estimated time of rehabilitation dose (minute/day)0.3380.952−1.008 to 2.9120.3140.988−0.948 to 2.923
Mild and severe malnutrition0.046−6.113−12.129 to −0.098———
Severe malnutrition———0.015−8.411−15.137 to −1.684
Model 1, R2 = 0.166, p = 0.010; Model 2, R2 = 0.182, p = 0.005. B, partial regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; GLIM, Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kokura, Y.; Momosaki, R. Prevalence of Malnutrition Assessed by the GLIM Criteria and Association with Activities of Daily Living in Older Residents in an Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3656. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173656

AMA Style

Kokura Y, Momosaki R. Prevalence of Malnutrition Assessed by the GLIM Criteria and Association with Activities of Daily Living in Older Residents in an Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care. Nutrients. 2022; 14(17):3656. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kokura, Yoji, and Ryo Momosaki. 2022. "Prevalence of Malnutrition Assessed by the GLIM Criteria and Association with Activities of Daily Living in Older Residents in an Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care" Nutrients 14, no. 17: 3656. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173656

APA Style

Kokura, Y., & Momosaki, R. (2022). Prevalence of Malnutrition Assessed by the GLIM Criteria and Association with Activities of Daily Living in Older Residents in an Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care. Nutrients, 14(17), 3656. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop