Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Fatty Acids on Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Diet and Blood Concentrations of Essential and Non-Essential Elements among Rural Residents in Arctic Russia
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acids: A Safe Tool for Improving Neurodevelopmental Alterations in Down Syndrome?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Influence of Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Vegetables on Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Natural Experiment

by
Daisuke Machida
1,2
1
Home Economics Education Course, Cooperative Faculty of Education, Gunma University, 4-2, Aramaki, Maebashi 371-8510, Gunma, Japan
2
Faculty of Agriculture, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, 37-1, Nakaorui, Takasaki 370-0033, Gunma, Japan
Nutrients 2022, 14(14), 2884; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142884
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 11 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nutrition and Dietary Intake in Rural Areas)

Abstract

:
Increased vegetable intake contributes to better health for people. The distribution of not-for-sale vegetables is an important source of vegetable intake in Japan. This study examined the impact of prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables on vegetable intake in Japan. This study regarded the increase in yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage in Nagano Prefecture in 2012 as a natural experiment. The years 2012 and 2016 were the large-scale survey years of the Japanese National Health and Nutrition Survey. Therefore, the effect of the change in prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables on vegetable intake was evaluated by comparing the changes in Chinese cabbage intake in Nagano between 2012 and 2016 with those of other prefectures classified in the same regional block as Nagano. Statistical analysis was performed using general linear models to examine the interaction of year and prefecture with Chinese cabbage intake. Consequently, the regression coefficient for the interaction term was −3.38 (95% CI, −9.59–2.83), that of the model adjusted for basic characteristics and energy intake was −2.99 (95% CI, −9.22–3.24), and that of the model adding health-related variables was −5.03 (95% CI, −12.40–2.34). The prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables typically had a minor effect on vegetable intake.

1. Introduction

Numerous studies have shown that increased fruit and vegetable intake is effective in preventing certain chronic diseases and reducing the risk of death from them [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. For example, it has been suggested that the consumption of the functional components found in Blueberry and Alliums is effective in the prevention of many chronic diseases [1,2]. In addition, evidence from epidemiological studies indicates that the overall intake of fruits and vegetables contributes to the prevention of certain chronic diseases, namely, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and mental illness, and a reduction in mortality [3,4,5,6,7]. The World Health Organization recommends that people consume 400 g of fruits and vegetables per day to promote good health [8].
Fruit and vegetable gardening is often used as a strategy to increase people’s fruit and vegetable intake. Numerous studies have analyzed the relationship between the use of school, community, and home gardens and fruit and vegetable intake [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Positive associations between gardening activity and fruit and vegetable intake were reported in many review studies [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Some reviews found no increase in fruit and vegetable intake or had inconsistent results; however, these were studies with children or with school gardens as the intervention setting [15,16,17]. Thus, although studies with children or school gardens have inconsistent results, there is generally a positive association between gardening and fruit and vegetable intake, especially among adults.
In rural Japan, in addition to self-production such as gardening, free giving and receiving of food is a common practice. Consequently, the impact of nonmarket foods on food intake cannot be ignored. On Hachijo Island, it was estimated that nonmarket foods account for approximately 25% of the production price basis, and approximately 17% of the caloric basis within food consumption [18]. Furthermore, it was assumed that approximately half of all food consumed was from nonmarket sources in seasons from the spring to autumn [19]. Hachijo Island is a particularly striking example, as it is a small island in the Pacific with a small population. However, other regions of Japan have also reported that nonmarket food is associated with diet, especially vegetable intake. A study conducted in rural Hokkaido found that the intake of vegetables received from neighbors was positively related with total vegetable intake [20]. Furthermore, in multiple locations in Gunma Prefecture, positive relationships have been confirmed among vegetable cultivation, vegetable reception and vegetable intake [21,22].
Therefore, I hypothesize that residents of areas with a high yield of not-for-sale fruits and vegetables consume a higher amount of fruits and vegetables. The harvested not-for-sale fruits and vegetables are first consumed by the grower’s household. Surplus vegetables and fruits are subsequently offered to neighbors. Neighbors who receive an excess of vegetables may offer their surplus to other neighbors. In this type of ecosystem, residents of neighborhoods with high yields of not-for-sale fruits and vegetables are likely to consume more fruits and vegetables. Previous studies have highlighted that the higher the yield of not-for-sale fruits and vegetables, the higher the intake of fruits and vegetables by residents [23,24]. However, these studies are ecological and cross-sectional, and further research is required to clarify causal relationships.
This report aims to predict the effect of changes in yields of not-for-sale vegetables by prefecture on vegetable intake in Japan. The vegetable yields used in this study were those recorded in national statistics in Japan. These figures do not include vegetables produced in home and community gardens. However, a previous study in Japan found that 96% of farmers grow vegetables for their own consumption and 84% distribute the vegetables they grow to their neighbors [22].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data

This study used two forms of national statistical data in Japan. The first was the National Crop Survey (NCS). The NCS clarified the actual conditions of crop production and shipment and prepared materials to formulate production targets and promote various measures in the food, agriculture, and rural basic plans [25]. The NCS surveyed the crop acreage, yield, and shipment amount of all agricultural product shipping organizations in the target prefectures [25]. The second was the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS). The NHNS investigated Japanese citizens’ physical condition, nutrient intake, and lifestyle. In addition, it obtained basic data to comprehensively promote people’s health, based on the Health Promotion Law [26,27]. The details of both of surveys are as described in the previous study [24].

2.2. Study Design

The natural experiment is an analytical method for identifying the effect of a specific factor on a treatment from an event in which several factors have complex influences by utilizing a change in circumstances that occurred by chance. It has been used in many studies in recent years [28,29,30]. In this study, I treated the changes in yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage due to the supply–demand adjustment in 2012 as a natural experiment. In 2012, the largest shipment restraint in recent years in Japan was implemented for summer Chinese cabbage and summer/autumn cabbage under the supply–demand adjustment [31]. This policy was adopted because high crop yields resulted in lower market prices. This has resulted in an increase in the yield of Chinese cabbage and cabbage that are not-for-sale.
In Japan, over 80% of summer Chinese cabbages are produced in Nagano Prefecture, and over 50% of summer/autumn cabbages are produced in Gunma Prefecture [25].
In addition, Nagano and Gunma Prefecture are in same area group in Japan (Kanto 2) [26,27]. This area group includes three prefectures other than Nagano and Gunma. Thus, I treated Nagano and Gunma as an experimental group and other prefectures in Kanto 2 as the control group. In addition, Gunma was included in the control group when Nagano was used as the experimental group and Nagano was included in the control group when Gunma was used as the experimental group.
To determine whether the increased yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage in Nagano and Gunma prefectures in 2012 affected the intake of Chinese cabbage and cabbage, I used NHNS data from 2012 and 2016 [26,27]. Only in 2012 and 2016 have large-scale surveys of the NHNS been conducted to date, with approximately five times as many responses as medium-scale surveys in other years. Fortunately, in 2012, the harvest of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage increased in Nagano and Gunma prefectures. This was due to supply and demand adjustments [31]. Therefore, this study estimated the effect of change in prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables on vegetable intake by comparing the change in Chinese cabbage and cabbage intake from 2012 to 2016 in the experimental and control groups (difference-in-differences).

2.3. Subjects

The subjects were men and women aged 20–79 years living in the Kanto 2 area. Those who did not respond to food intake status and pregnant and lactating women, whose diets may have been significantly affected, were excluded from the analysis. In addition, subjects with energy intakes below 800 kcal and over 3000 kcal (approximately mean ± 2 SD) were excluded. Information on subjects is presented in Table 1.

2.4. Outcomes

I used data for Chinese cabbage and cabbage intake calculated by the NHNS. In Japan, Chinese cabbage is often eaten as a pickle, and in NHNS, pickled Chinese cabbage is classified as pickled leaves. This is tabulated separately from Chinese cabbage intake [26,27]. Therefore, when considering the intake of Chinese cabbage as an outcome, I used the intake of Chinese cabbage and the total intake of Chinese cabbage and pickled leaves as outcomes.

2.5. Analyses

2.5.1. Trend of Yield of Not-for-Sale Chinese Cabbage and Cabbage

The trend of the yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage was calculated from NCS data. The trends for the surrounding 10 years (2009–2018), including the 2012 and 2016 data for the analysis, were output for Chinese cabbage and cabbage. Similar to previous studies [23,24] that used NCS data, the not-for-sale yield was defined and calculated as the amount harvested minus the amount shipped by prefectures (ton/year). Furthermore, the not-for-sale yield was divided by the population of each prefecture (national census data [32]) and the number of days in a year, and ton was converted to gram (×106) to calculate the value as the not-for-sale yield per person per day.

2.5.2. Confirmation of Parallel Trends

When conducting difference-in-differences analysis, it is a prerequisite that the trends of the outcome variables are parallel between the experimental and control groups before the period of interest. However, since large-scale surveys of the NHNS were conducted twice, it is difficult to directly confirm whether parallel trends existed between the experimental and target groups before 2012. Therefore, this study tentatively confirmed the parallel trend by referring to a previous study by Suzuki et al. [33]. I used data from Kanto 1, located close to Kanto 2 in the regional classification of the NHNS [26,27], to confirm the parallel trend with the Kanto 2 control group as a convenient alternative.
General linear models were used in the analyses. Independent variables were the survey year (2012 (ref.) and 2016), area (Kanto 2 (ref.) and Kanto 1), and their interaction terms. Dependent variables were Chinese cabbage intake, total intake of Chinese cabbage and leafy pickles, and cabbage intake. The regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) were calculated. Four prefectures belong to Kanto 1. The information of the subjects in Kanto 1 is shown in Table A1. For the Kanto 2 subjects, the analyses were performed excluding Nagano or Gunma as the experimental group.

2.5.3. Main Analyses (Difference-in-Differences)

I examined whether there was a difference in the change in each intake from 2012 to 2016 between the groups. The survey year, prefecture, and their interaction terms were the independent variables, and each intake was the dependent variable. Three models were used in the analyses. Model 1 was a crude model. Model 2 was a model adjusted for basic characteristics (sex, age, living style, and employment) and energy intake (quartile groups). Model 3 adjusted for health-related indicators (body mass index, alcohol drinking) in addition to Model 2. Regression coefficients (95% CIs) and estimated means (95% CIs) were calculated for each model.

2.5.4. Software and Statistical Significance

All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 28.0 (IBM Japan, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and Python 3.9.7 was used to create the figures.
The statistical significance level was not set due to instructions from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare when applying for data use because the sample size was too small for proper prefecture-level comparisons.

2.6. Ethical Approval

The NHNS data were obtained with permission from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The NCS data were obtained from the Japanese official statistics portal site e-stat, and these data did not contain any personally identifiable information. This study was approved by Takasaki University of Health and Welfare Research Ethics Committee (No.: 1907; Approval date: 31 May 2019).

3. Results

3.1. Trends of Yield of Not-for-Sale Chinese Cabbage and Cabbage

Trends of yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage from 2009 to 2018 are shown in Figure 1 and Table A2. In Nagano Prefecture, the not-for-sale yield of Chinese cabbage in 2012 was higher than in the preceding and following years. In Nagano Prefecture, it was 52.9 g/day/person in 2012 and between 31.6 and 44.5 g/day/person in other years (in 2016: 40.6 g/day/person). In the other prefectures, the range was between 10.7 and 13.1 g/day/person (in 2012: 10.8 g/day/person; in 2016: 12.4 g/day/person). In addition, in Gunma Prefecture, the not-for-sale yield of cabbage in 2012 was higher than in the other years. In Gunma Prefecture, it was 45.7 g/day/person in 2012, and ranged between 24.4 and 35.1 g/day/person in other years (in 2016: 24.4 g/day/person). In the other prefectures, the range was 5.8–6.8 g/day/person (in 2012: 6.3 g/day/person; in 2016: 5.8 g/day/person).

3.2. Parallel Trends

The results of the confirmation of parallel trends are shown in Table 2. The coefficients (95% CIs) of interaction of Chinese cabbage and Chinese cabbage with pickled leaves were 1.000 (−2.915–4.916) and 1.006 (−3.249–5.261), respectively. The coefficient (95% CI) of interaction of cabbage was −10.194 (−14.680 to −5.706). Interactions were small for Chinese cabbage and Chinese cabbage with pickled leaves as the dependent variable. However, the interaction with cabbage as the dependent variable was large. Therefore, only Chinese cabbage and Chinese cabbage with pickled leaves were used in the main analysis.

3.3. Main Analyses (Difference-in-Differences)

The results of difference-in-differences analyses are shown in Table 3, Figure 2, and Table A3. For Chinese cabbage, interaction coefficients (95% CIs) of Models 1, 2, and 3 were −3.380 (−9.590–2.829), −2.991 (−9.217–3.236), and −5.032 (−12.406–2.342), respectively. For Chinese cabbage with pickled leaves, interaction coefficients (95% CIs) of Models 1, 2, and 3 were −3.380 (−9.590–2.829), −2.991 (−9.217–3.236), and −5.032 (−12.406–2.342), respectively. From 2012 to 2016, Chinese cabbage intake decreased in both Nagano and the other prefectures. However, the decrease was larger in Nagano in all models. These trends were similar when using the Chinese cabbage with pickled leaves as the dependent variable. For example, in Model 1 with Chinese cabbage as the dependent variable, Nagano decreased by 6.6 g (from 27.6 g in 2012 to 21.0 g in 2016), while the other prefectures decreased by 3.2 g (from 19.1 g in 2012 to 15.9 g in 2016).

4. Discussion

This study examined the impact of prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables on vegetable intake among a Japanese population. I regarded the increase in the yield of Chinese cabbage and cabbage that were not shipped in Nagano or Gunma Prefecture in 2012 as a natural experiment. The years 2012 and 2016 were the large-scale survey years of NHNS. Therefore, the effect of the change in prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables was evaluated by comparing the changes in intake in each prefecture between 2012 and 2016. Parallel trends were checked using a second control group, and no parallel trends were identified for cabbage. The results of the main analyses highlighted that the interaction between year and prefecture on the intake of Chinese cabbage was small. From 2012 to 2016, Chinese cabbage intake decreased in both Nagano and the other prefectures; however, the decrease was larger in Nagano. A number of reports have confirmed the relationship between the prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables and vegetable intake [23,24]. However, none have examined the causal relationship, and this is the first study to verify a causal relationship. Increased vegetable intake lowers the risk of certain chronic diseases and death [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The results of this study provide an important resource for improving health through vegetable intake in rural Japan.
The decrease in Chinese cabbage intake between 2012 and 2016 was approximately twice as large in Nagano compared to other prefectures. The absolute amount was approximately from 3 to 5 g/day/person. A previous study has estimated that a 1 g/day/person increase in the yield of prefecture-level not-for-sale vegetables increases prefectural residents’ vegetable intake by 0.390 g/day/person (95% CI: 0.183−0.596) [24]. The difference in the yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage between Nagano and other prefectures in this study was 42.1 g/day/person (52.9–10.8) in 2012, and 28.2 g/day/person (40.6–12.4) in 2016. Therefore, the difference decreased by 13.9 g/day/person from 2012 to 2016. Using the estimates from the previous study [24], it is estimated that a difference of 5.4 g/day/person (95% CI: 2.5–8.3) in the decrease in Chinese cabbage intake between 2012 and 2016 between Nagano and other prefectures would occur. In light of this value, it is valid that the decrease was approximately 3–5 g greater in Nagano Prefecture in this study.
A previous study has reported high vegetable intake in rural areas of Gunma Prefecture, Japan, despite poor access to stores selling food products, and has suggested that part of this is contributed by home consumption and received food [21]. When the results of this study and those of the previous study [24] are combined, the amount of yield of not-for-sale vegetables contributing to vegetable intake is minimal. Considering cost-effectiveness, it is inappropriate to adopt a policy of growing large quantities of not-for-sale vegetables. However, modestly maintaining the small contribution from the yield of not-for-sale vegetables that currently exists is important for maintaining a healthy dietary intake for rural residents. However, the number of farmers and cultivated land areas are reducing in Japan [34,35]. The agricultural support policies that would break out of this situation are necessary to maintain a modest distribution of not-for-sale crops in Japanese rural areas.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, similar to previous studies, these results only pertain to Japan [23,24]. In Japan, it is common to share one’s produce surplus with neighbors. Therefore, the results of similar studies will differ in countries and regions where there is no such accepted culture. Consequently, in this study, only the yield of not-for-sale vegetables produced by farmers was used. The crops produced by nonfarmers in home gardens and community gardens were excluded. In fact, many studies have shown that vegetable intake increases due to home gardening and community gardening activities [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, future studies should use a method to estimate the amount of not-for-sale vegetable yield by also including these. In addition, this study examined data at the prefecture-level. However, the transfer of surplus often appears within smaller regional units or social connections among people not in the local community. Therefore, further micro-scale regional or social community-based studies are required. Finally, this study focused on Chinese cabbage, for which a natural experimental environment was accidentally identified. (Cabbage was excluded in the main analysis because no parallel trend was identified, but crude values calculated from the NHNS data were provided as a supplement file (Table S1).) Therefore, future studies should analyze other vegetables and fruits to discover similar trends.

5. Conclusions

This study examined the impact of the prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables on vegetable intake in Japan, focusing on Chinese cabbage intake. I confirmed whether the significant increase in the harvest of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage in Nagano Prefecture in 2012 affected the amount of Chinese cabbage intake among Nagano residents by comparing it to 2016. Consequently, the interaction between year and prefecture was minor. From 2012 to 2016, Chinese cabbage intake decreased in both Nagano and the other prefectures; however, the decrease was larger in Nagano. In conclusion, the effect of the prefecture-level yield of not-for-sale vegetables on vegetable intake might be small.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14142884/s1, Table S1: Cabbage intake according to prefectures.

Funding

The author has been funded by JSPS KAKENHI grant number [JP18K13037, JP21K13503].

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by Takasaki University of Health and Welfare Research Ethics Committee (No.: 1907; Approval date: 31 May 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Information of subjects among Kanto 1.
Table A1. Information of subjects among Kanto 1.
Survey Year
20122016
N%n%
1819 1588
Prefecture
Saitama57231.451532.4
Chiba48126.453233.5
Tokyo36620.130018.9
Kanagawa40022.024115.2
Gender
Men85046.774046.6
Women96953.384853.4
Age
20–3947926.333921.3
40–5963735.056735.7
60–7970338.668242.9
Living style
Living alone1739.520412.8
Living together164690.5138487.2
Employment
Not agricultural worker179498.6155397.8
Agricultural worker251.4312.0
(Missing)00.040.3
Energy intake
1st quartile group43523.941125.9
2nd quartile group48626.741025.8
3rd quartile group45024.741225.9
4th quartile group44824.635522.4
Body mass index
<18.51287.01096.9
18.5 to <25.0110160.586154.2
≥25.038221.030719.3
(Missing)20811.431119.6
Alcohol drinking
Rarely or never85446.978449.4
4 day/week or less53429.443627.5
5 day/week or more40822.433721.2
(Missing)231.3312.0
Table A2. Trends of yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage.
Table A2. Trends of yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage.
Chinese CabbageCabbage
YearNaganoOther Pref.GunmaOther Pref.
200944.510.934.06.8
201034.310.732.66.4
201138.411.131.26.8
201252.910.845.76.3
201333.210.933.96.2
201433.211.733.56.1
201533.011.528.56.1
201640.612.424.45.8
201733.712.834.06.8
201831.613.135.16.6
Not-for-sale yield (g/day/person). Nagano: only Nagano Prefecture; Gunma: only Gunma Prefecture; Other pref.: for Chinese cabbage, mean of prefectures among Kanto 2 other than Nagano (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Yamanashi). For cabbage, mean of prefectures among Kanto 2 other than Gunma (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Yamanashi, and Nagano).
Table A3. Trends of Chinese cabbage intake according to prefectures.
Table A3. Trends of Chinese cabbage intake according to prefectures.
Chinese CabbageChinese Cabbage
and Pickled Leaves
YearPrefectureM95% CIM95% CI
Model 1
2012Nagano27.6 (23.9, 31.2)35.3 (31.2, 39.2)
Other Pref.19.1 (17.2, 20.8)24.9 (22.9, 26.8)
2016Nagano21.0 (16.8, 25.1)26.5 (22.0, 31.0)
Other Pref.15.9 (13.7, 17.9)19.9 (17.5, 22.1)
Model 2
2012Nagano27.5 (23.8, 31.1)34.6 (30.6, 38.5)
Other Pref.19.0 (17.2, 20.8)25.0 (23.0, 26.9)
2016Nagano21.4 (17.2, 25.6)26.3 (21.7, 30.8)
Other Pref.15.9 (13.7, 18.0)20.2 (17.8, 22.4)
Model 3
2012Nagano29.2 (25.1, 33.2)36.7 (32.2, 41.1)
Other Pref.18.3 (16.2, 20.3)24.8 (22.4, 27.0)
2016Nagano22.4 (17.0, 27.6)27.3 (21.5, 33.0)
Other Pref.16.5 (13.9, 18.9)20.6 (17.9, 23.3)
M: Estimated mean; CI: confidence intervals. Nagano: only Nagano Prefecture; Other pref.: prefectures among Kanto 2 other than Nagano (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Yamanashi). Model 1: Crude models (n = 5794). Model 2: Adjusted for gender, age, living style, employment, and energy intake (n = 5788). Model 3: Adjusted for body mass index, and alcohol drinking added to Model 2 (n = 4502).

References

  1. Ma, L.; Sun, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Luo, M.; Yang, J. Molecular mechanism and health role of functional ingredients in blueberry for chronic disease in human beings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zeng, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Pu, X.; Du, J.; Yang, X.; Yang, T.; Yang, S. Therapeutic role of functional components in alliums for preventive chronic disease in human being. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 9402849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aune, D.; Giovannucci, E.; Boffetta, P.; Fadnes, L.T.; Keum, N.; Norat, T.; Greenwood, D.C.; Riboli, E.; Vatten, L.J.; Tonstad, S. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1029–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. He, F.J.; Nowsonk, C.A.; Lucas, M.; MacGregor, G.A. Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables is related to a reduced risk of coronary heart disease: Meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2007, 21, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. He, F.J.; Nowsonk, C.A.; Lucas, M.; MacGregor, G.A. Fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke: Meta-analysis of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006, 367, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guzek, D.; Głąbska, D.; Groele, B.; Gutkowska, K. Fruit and vegetable dietary patterns and mental health in women: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2021, 80, 1357–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ju, S.Y.; Park, Y.K. Low fruit and vegetable intake is associated with depression among Korean adults in data from the 2014 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2019, 38, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Health Organization. Healthy Diet. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet (accessed on 24 June 2022).
  9. Garcia, M.T.; Ribeiro, S.M.; Germani, A.C.C.G.; Bógus, C.M. The impact of urban gardens on adequate and healthy food: A systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Schram-Bijkerk, D.; Otte, P.; Dirven, L.; Breure, A.M. Indicators to support healthy urban gardening in urban management. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Langellotto, G.; Gupta, A. Gardening increases vegetable consumption in school-aged children: A meta-analytical synthesis. HortTechnology 2012, 22, 430–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. McCormack, L.A.; Laska, M.N.; Larson, N.I.; Story, M. Review of the nutritional implications of farmers’ markets and community gardens: A call for evaluation and research efforts. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Robinson-O’Brien, R.; Story, M.; Heim, S. Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: A review. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Machida, D.; Kushida, O. The influence of food production experience on dietary knowledge, awareness, behaviors, and health among Japanese: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Savoie-Roskos, M.R.; Wengreen, H.; Durward, C. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among children and youth through gardening-based interventions: A systematic review. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 117, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ohly, H.; Gentry, S.; Wigglesworth, R.; Bethel, A.; Lovell, R.; Garside, R. A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 286. [Google Scholar]
  17. Davis, J.N.; Spaniol, M.R.; Somerset, S. Sustenance and sustainability: Maximizing the impact of school gardens on health outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 2358–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tatebayashi, K.; Kamiyama, C.; Matsui, T.; Saito, O.; Machimura, T. Accounting shadow benefits of non-market food through food-sharing networks on Hachijo Island, Japan. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saito, O.; Havas, J.; Shirai, K.; Kurisu, K.; Aramaki, T.; Hanaki, K. Non-Market food provisioning services in Hachijo Island, Japan and their implications toward building a resilient island. J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. Ser. G 2015, 71, 349–357. [Google Scholar]
  20. Umezawa, A.; Miwa, T.; Shibui, E.; Namikawa, T.; Tanaka, N.; Ishikawa, M. Total vegetable intake and homegrown vegetable intake in the rural area residents of Hokkaido. Eiyogaku Zassi 2012, 70, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Machida, D.; Yoshida, T. Vegetable intake frequency is higher among the rural than among the urban or suburban residents, and is partially related to vegetable cultivation, receiving, and purchasing at farmers’ markets: A cross-sectional study in a city within Gunma, Japan. J. Rural. Med. 2018, 13, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Machida, D.; Yoshida, T. Negative association of vegetable cultivation with the proportion of severely insufficient vegetable intake both directly and indirectly: A cross-sectional study in a city in Gunma, Japan. J. Rural. Med. 2018, 13, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Machida, D.; Kushida, O.; Yoshida, T. Relationship between vegetable intake and vegetable cultivation by prefecture in Japan: An ecological study at the prefectural level. Nihon Kenkoukyouiku Gakkaishi 2017, 25, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  24. Machida, D. Relationship between Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Fruits and Vegetables and Individual-Level Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Outline of National Crop Survey (Vegetables). Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/kouhyou/sakumotu/sakkyou_yasai/gaiyou/index.html#1 (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
  26. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan. 2016. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000681180.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
  27. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan. 2012. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/dl/h24-houkoku.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
  28. Brittin, J.; Frerichs, L.; Sirard, J.R.; Wells, N.M.; Myers, B.M.; Garcia, J.; Sorensen, D.; Trowbridge, M.J.; Huang, T. Impacts of active school design on school-time sedentary behavior and physical activity: A pilot natural experiment. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 0189236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Petimar, J.; Moran, A.J.; Ramirez, M.; Block, J.P. A Natural Experiment to Evaluate the Nutritional Content of Restaurant Meal Purchases After Calorie Labeling. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2020, 120, 2039–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Barlow, P.; McKee, M.; Basu, S.; Stuckler, D. Impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: A natural experiment using synthetic control methods. CMAJ 2017, 189, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Agriculture & Livestock Industries Corporation. Handouts for the 2nd Vegetable Supply and Demand Council Meeting in FY2012 (Document 1–2: Implementation of Emergency Supply and Demand Adjustment Project for Cabbage and Chinese Cabbage). Available online: https://www.alic.go.jp/content/000088408.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
  32. Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Summary of Census Results. 2015. Available online: https://www.stat.go.jp/data/kokusei/2015/kekka/kihon1/pdf/gaiyou1.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
  33. Suzuki, W.; Iwamoto, Y.; Yuda, M.; Morozumi, R. Measuring the effect of specific health checkups and specific maintenance guidance in Japan: Evidence from program evaluation approaches. Jpn. J. Health Econ. Policy 2015, 27, 2–39. [Google Scholar]
  34. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Statistics on the Agricultural Labor Force. Available online: http://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/sihyo/data/08.html (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
  35. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Area Survey. Available online: http://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/kouhyou/sakumotu/menseki/index.html#r (accessed on 17 June 2022). (In Japanese)
Figure 1. Trends of yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage. Nagano: only Nagano Prefecture; Gunma: only Gunma Prefecture; Other pref.: for Chinese cabbage, mean of prefecture among Kanto 2 other than Nagano (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Yamanashi), and for cabbage, mean of prefecture among Kanto 2 other than Gunma (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Yamanashi, and Nagano). Details of the data are shown in Table A2.
Figure 1. Trends of yield of not-for-sale Chinese cabbage and cabbage. Nagano: only Nagano Prefecture; Gunma: only Gunma Prefecture; Other pref.: for Chinese cabbage, mean of prefecture among Kanto 2 other than Nagano (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Yamanashi), and for cabbage, mean of prefecture among Kanto 2 other than Gunma (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Yamanashi, and Nagano). Details of the data are shown in Table A2.
Nutrients 14 02884 g001
Figure 2. Trends of Chinese cabbage intake according to prefectures. Nagano: only Nagano Prefecture; Other pref.: prefectures among Kanto 2 other than Nagano (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Yamanashi). Details of the data are shown in Table A3.
Figure 2. Trends of Chinese cabbage intake according to prefectures. Nagano: only Nagano Prefecture; Other pref.: prefectures among Kanto 2 other than Nagano (i.e., Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Yamanashi). Details of the data are shown in Table A3.
Nutrients 14 02884 g002
Table 1. Information of subjects among Kanto 2.
Table 1. Information of subjects among Kanto 2.
Survey Year
20122016
n%n%
3369 2425
Prefecture
Ibaraki79523.642217.4
Tochigi71321.270829.2
Gunma66919.943918.1
Yamanashi53816.035214.5
Nagano65419.450420.8
Gender
Men160647.7115247.5
Women176352.3127352.5
Age
20–3974922.251021.0
40–59121736.186135.5
60–79140341.6105443.5
Living style
Living alone2156.42399.9
Living together315493.6218690.1
Employment
Not agricultural worker310392.1228494.2
Agricultural worker2667.91355.6
(Missing)00.060.2
Energy intake
1st quartile group86025.559524.5
2nd quartile group78123.262325.7
3rd quartile group83724.860124.8
4th quartile group89126.460625.0
Body mass index
<18.51795.31365.6
18.5 to <25.0180153.5117648.5
≥25.071121.153121.9
(Missing)67820.158224.0
Alcohol drinking
Rarely or never171851.0130954.0
4 days/week or less83924.952321.6
5 days/week or more76522.755322.8
(missing)471.4401.6
Table 2. Confirmation of parallel trends.
Table 2. Confirmation of parallel trends.
Chinese Cabbage
(n = 8043)
Chinese Cabbage
and Pickled Leaves
(n = 8043)
Cabbage
(n = 8093)
Coef.95% CICoef.95% CICoef.95% CI
Interaction (year × area)1.000(−2.915, 4.916)1.006(−3.249, 5.261)−10.194(−14.680, −5.706)
Year2.228(−0.729, 5.185)4.047(0.833, 7.260)3.039(−0.361, 6.439)
Area1.769(−1.151, 4.689)3.434(0.260, 6.607)5.953(2.620, 9.286)
(Intercept)14.095(11.934, 16.255)16.436(14.087, 18.783)29.745(27.259, 32.229)
General linear models. Year: 2012 (ref.) and 2016; area: Kanto 2 (ref.) and Kanto 1. Coef.: regression coefficients; CI: confidence intervals.
Table 3. Interaction of year and prefecture on Chinese cabbage intake.
Table 3. Interaction of year and prefecture on Chinese cabbage intake.
Model 1Model 2Model 3
Coef.95% CICoef.95% CICoef.95% CI
Chinese cabbage
Interaction (year × prefecture)−3.380 (−9.590, 2.829)−2.991 (−9.217, 3.236)−5.032 (−12.406, 2.342)
Year6.609 (1.060, 12.156)6.075 (0.517, 11.632)6.862 (0.243, 13.480)
Prefecture−5.138 (−9.822, −0.453)−5.465 (−10.20, −0.728)−5.877 (−11.726, −0.026)
(Intercept)21.002 (16.832, 25.170)16.052 (8.199, 23.903)15.703 (4.227, 27.179)
Chinese cabbage and Pickled leaves
Interaction (year × prefecture)−3.684 (−10.420, 3.052)−3.495 (−10.247, 3.256)−5.218 (−13.271, 2.835)
Year8.736 (2.718, 14.754)8.286 (2.260, 14.312)9.355 (2.127, 16.582)
Prefecture−6.658 (−11.739, −1.576)−6.143 (−11.278, −1.006)−6.726 (−13.114, −0.338)
(Intercept)26.528 (22.004, 31.050)22.171 (13.656, 30.685)18.291 (5.7584, 30.822)
General liner models. Year: 2012 (ref.) and 2016; prefecture: Nagano and other prefectures (ref.). Coef.: regression coefficients; CI: confidence intervals. Model 1: Crude models (n = 5794). Model 2: Adjusted for gender, age, living style, employment, and energy intake (n = 5788). Model 3: Adjusted for body mass index, and alcohol drinking added to Model 2 (n = 4502).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Machida, D. Influence of Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Vegetables on Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Natural Experiment. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142884

AMA Style

Machida D. Influence of Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Vegetables on Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Natural Experiment. Nutrients. 2022; 14(14):2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142884

Chicago/Turabian Style

Machida, Daisuke. 2022. "Influence of Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Vegetables on Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Natural Experiment" Nutrients 14, no. 14: 2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142884

APA Style

Machida, D. (2022). Influence of Prefecture-Level Yield of Not-for-Sale Vegetables on Vegetable Intake in Japan: A Natural Experiment. Nutrients, 14(14), 2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142884

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop