Next Article in Journal
Implications of Resveratrol in Obesity and Insulin Resistance: A State-of-the-Art Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Intake Patterns and Lifestyle Behaviors of Pregnant Women Living in a Manitoba First Nations Community: Implications for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Effect of Selenium Supplementation on Production of Selected Cytokines in Women with Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Brain Iron and Mental Health Symptoms in Youth with and without Prenatal Alcohol Exposure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Choline Supplementation Modifies the Effects of Developmental Alcohol Exposure on Immune Responses in Adult Rats

1
Center for Behavioral Teratology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92120, USA
2
Department of Psychology, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA
3
Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(14), 2868; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142868
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 13 July 2022

Abstract

:
Prenatal alcohol exposure can disrupt the development of numerous systems, including the immune system. Indeed, alterations in cytokine levels may contribute to the neuropathological, behavioral, and cognitive problems, and other adverse outcomes observed in individuals with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Importantly, supplementation with the essential nutrient choline can improve performance in hippocampal-dependent behaviors; thus, the present study examined the effects of choline on plasma and hippocampal cytokines in adult rats exposed to ethanol in early development. From postnatal day (PD) 4–9 (third trimester equivalent), pups received ethanol (5.25 g/kg/day) or Sham intubations. Subjects were treated with choline chloride (100 mg/kg/day) or saline from PD10–30. On PD60, plasma and hippocampal tissue was collected before and after an immune challenge (lipopolysaccharide (LPS); 50 ug/kg). Prior to the immune challenge, ethanol-exposed subjects showed an overall increase in hippocampal pro-inflammatory cytokines, an effect mitigated by choline supplementation. In contrast, in the plasma, choline reduced LPS-related increases in pro-inflammatory markers, particularly in ethanol-exposed subjects. Thus, early choline supplementation may modify both brain and peripheral inflammation. These results suggest that early choline can mitigate some long-term effects of ethanol exposure on hippocampal inflammation, which may contribute to improved hippocampal function, and could also influence peripheral immune responses that may impact overall health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) pose a serious public health concern across the globe, including in the United States, where they affect approximately 2–7% of children [1,2,3]. Alcohol exposure during gestation can disrupt normal development, resulting in a wide range of physical, neuropathological, cognitive, and behavioral alterations that present in childhood and can persist throughout a person’s life [4]. Emerging evidence indicates alterations in immune and neuroimmune systems after developmental alcohol exposure, including microglia activation (the brain’s resident immune cells) and cytokine dysregulations, which may contribute to impaired health and FASD neuropathology, as well as cognitive, behavioral, and other adverse outcomes [5]. Proper function of the immune/neuroimmune systems is crucial for normal brain development, as cytokines are involved in multiple developmental processes such as neurogenesis, myelination, angiogenesis, synaptogenesis, and apoptosis [6]. Interestingly, abnormalities in immune function have been linked to other neurodevelopmental disorders such as schizophrenia [7] and autism spectrum disorders [8], as well as neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease [9].
Animal models of FASD have shown ethanol-induced neuroinflammation in multiple brain regions, including the hippocampus. Multiple studies have reported cytokine dysregulation leading to an imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, as well as microglia activation in neonates exposed to alcohol during development [10,11,12,13,14]. Importantly, changes in neuroimmune activity after prenatal exposure to alcohol are not only seen in neonates, but may be long lasting [15,16]. Many studies report altered immune responses in subjects that were exposed to alcohol prenatally or during early postnatal life. For example, adult offspring with developmental alcohol exposure show exaggerated neuroimmune responses to the challenge of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [14,15] or chronic adult ethanol exposure [17]. Interestingly, subjects that were prenatally exposed to alcohol and challenged with LPS as adults showed significant memory impairments, as well as increased hippocampal and peripheral pro-inflammatory cytokines, compared to controls [14].
Clinical studies have also shown that alcohol use during pregnancy can alter cytokine levels. Similar to animal studies, an initial clinical study reported increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, in maternal and fetal blood collected from chronic alcohol users during pregnancy [18]. More recent studies have identified specific cytokine networks in both maternal and child blood samples that are associated with both alcohol consumption during pregnancy and adverse child neurodevelopment [19,20]. Collectively, these preclinical and clinical studies suggest exposure to alcohol during development elicits long-lasting changes in immune and neuroimmune function. Such alterations may contribute to the developmental changes seen in FASD.
Identification of treatments that reduce the severity of FASD is critical, specifically regarding interventions that can improve neurodevelopment and cognitive function. One potential intervention that is currently being investigated in FASD is the essential nutrient choline [21]. Choline is critical for normal brain development and cognitive function, with studies showing life-long memory enhancement in typically developing subjects that received perinatal choline supplementation [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Preclinical studies have illustrated that perinatal choline supplementation is also neuroprotective in a variety of both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative models [27,28]. Although some choline is produced endogenously, choline levels depend largely on dietary intake [24,25].
Preclinical models have demonstrated that choline supplementation can attenuate the effects of developmental alcohol exposure, specifically alcohol-induced behavioral and cognitive alterations [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Moreover, choline can improve hippocampal-dependent learning and memory [29,30,31,34] and can enhance hippocampal plasticity [35], even when administered after developmental ethanol exposure. Recent clinical studies in FASD support preclinical findings, with cognitive improvements reported in children who received choline supplementation either prenatally [36,37] or postnatally [38,39]. Notably, one recent clinical trial found toddlers with FASD that received choline supplementation for 9 months showed improvements in visual–spatial skills, working memory, and attention 4 years after choline supplementation was provided [38,39]. These studies demonstrate the ability of choline to attenuate alcohol-induced behavioral and cognitive alterations, inducing long-lasting beneficial effects.
Although the mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of choline in FASD are not well understood, it is possible that choline may reduce the severity of FASD, in part, by mitigating alcohol-induced immune/neuroimmune dysregulation. Choline acts as an anti-inflammatory modulator in neurodegenerative [40,41] and neurodevelopmental [42] models. Choline is a selective competitive agonist for alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7AChR) that are found on both neurons and microglia in various brain regions, including the hippocampus. Importantly, preclinical models show that choline can affect cytokine levels during development. For example, a human placental trophoblast cell-culture model found that choline deficiency significantly increased expression of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines [43]. In contrast, prenatal choline supplementation can reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL1-β, in both typical [44] and atypical developmental models [45].
Choline supplementation may also modulate immune and neuroimmune responses to environmental stimuli. Prenatal choline supplementation can reduce immune responses, as measured by inflammatory cytokines in serum and placenta, in pregnant rats exposed to LPS during gestation [46]. Not only can choline modify peripheral immune responses, but choline supplementation can also reduce LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus and protect against LPS-induced cognitive impairments [47]. Moreover, in a maternal immune activation mouse model (a model of environmental risk factor for autism and schizophrenia), maternal choline supplementation triggered an anti-inflammatory response in fetal brains and improved behavioral alterations when these subjects became adults [42]. Collectively, these studies suggest that choline could mitigate alcohol-induced immune and neuroimmune dysregulation.
The current study examined the effects of postnatal choline supplementation on peripheral and hippocampal cytokines in a rodent model that simulates the third trimester of human pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to (1) examine the effects of choline supplementation on baseline cytokine levels in adult animals exposed to alcohol during early development, and (2) determine the ability of choline supplementation to modulate LPS-induced immune and neuroimmune responses in alcohol-exposed subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

All experimental procedures were approved by the San Diego State University (SDSU) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the National Institutes of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Adult male and female Sprague Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Hollister, CA, USA). Subjects used in this study were bred in the mating colony at the SDSU Center for Behavioral Teratology vivarium. One male and one female Sprague Dawley rat were housed overnight, and the presence of a seminal plug indicated gestational day (GD) 0. Pregnant dams were then singly housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with the day of birth, usually occurring on GD 22, being designated as the postnatal day (PD) 0. On PD 1, litters were culled to 8 pups (4 males and 4 females when possible). On PD 7, pups had their paw pads tattooed with non-toxic veterinary black tattoo ink (STONE Manufacturing and Supply Company, Kansas City, MO, USA) for identification purposes that kept the experimenters blind to treatment. Pups were weaned on PD 21 and separated by sex on PD 28.

2.2. Design and Treatment

The current study used a 2 Ethanol (Ethanol (EtOH), Sham) × 2 Choline (Choline, Saline) × 2 Sex (Male, Female) design. On PD 4, neonatal rat pups were randomly assigned to an exposure (Ethanol, Sham) and treatment (Choline, Saline) group. One sex pair per litter was assigned to each group to control for potential litter effects. Figure 1 shows the experimental timeline.

2.3. Developmental Alcohol Exposure

On PD 4–9, rats were developmentally exposed to ethanol during their brain growth spurt; this period mimics 3rd-trimester development in humans [48], when the hippocampus is particularly vulnerable to alcohol exposure [49,50]. Subjects assigned to the ethanol exposure group received 5.25 g/kg/day of ethanol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), dissolved in an artificial milk diet [51]. The ethanol–milk solution (11.9% v/v) was delivered in 2 intragastric intubations 2 h apart. Two additional milk feedings (2 h apart) were given each day [52]. This method of binge-like developmental alcohol exposure produces blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) consistent with high alcohol consumption [52], comparable to moderate–high binge drinking levels in humans [53]. Subjects assigned to the Sham control group did not receive ethanol and/or milk diet. However, they did undergo the same number of intragastric intubations (Sham intubations).

2.4. Peak Blood Alcohol Concentrations

On PD 6, 90 min after the second ethanol intubation, 20 µL of blood was collected from the tail to determine peak BAC [54]. Plasma was analyzed using an Analox Alcohol Analyzer (Model AM1, Analox Instruments, Lunenburg, ME, USA). Sham controls also had blood collected to help control for potential procedural stress.

2.5. Choline Supplementation

From PD 10–30, half of the subjects in each of the exposure groups were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with 100 mg/kg/day of choline (6.667 mL/kg/day; Balchem, New Hampton, NY, USA). This dose is the most effective at reducing behavioral alterations associated with 3rd-trimester alcohol exposure [30]. The remaining subjects received injections of sterile saline (0.85% sodium chloride solution, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). This time period in rats is the equivalent of early infancy and childhood in humans [55].

2.6. Immune Challenge and Tissue Collection

On PD 60, rats received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 50 µg/kg of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Escherichia coli; Serotype 026:B6, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), dissolved in sterilized saline (2 mL/kg), as an immune challenge. Blood samples were collected from the tail 30 min prior to the immune challenge (pre-LPS) and 90 min post-injection (post-LPS). Four hours following the immune challenge, rats were anesthetized using isoflurane and 600 µL of blood was collected via intracardial puncture prior to euthanasia via decapitation. Brains were removed and hippocampi were dissected and flash frozen using liquid nitrogen. Samples were transported on dry ice to the University of British Columbia for further processing.

2.7. Tissue Homogenization

Lysis buffer was prepared containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, and 1% Triton X-100, and immediately prior to homogenization, the following were added (per 10 mL lysis buffer): 1 complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 100 µL phosphate inhibitor 2 and 3 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 100 µL 1 M NaF, and 40 µL PMSF (from 500 mM stock in DMSO). Hippocampal samples were added to 1.6 mL tubes containing 8 zirconium oxide beads and 200 µL lysis buffer. Samples were homogenized using the Omni Bead Ruptor 24 (Omni International, Kennesaw, GA, USA) in 4 cycles (speed: 2.10, time: 5 s), with 1 min on ice in between cycles. Following homogenization, tissue samples were centrifuged at 1400× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Separate aliquots of supernatant were removed for protein quantification and cytokine analyses and stored at −20 °C until assayed.

2.8. Protein Measurements

Total protein levels were quantified in tissue hippocampal homogenates using the Pierce Microplate BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Tissue homogenates were diluted (1:41) and the standard BCA protocol was followed. Homogenate samples were run in quadruplicate and the average protein concentration (µg/mL) across the 4 samples was calculated (samples with CVs ≥ 10 were re-run). Cytokine levels were then adjusted, and values reported as pg cytokine/mg of protein.

2.9. Cytokine Measurements

Multiplex cytokine assays were performed using the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) pro-inflammatory panel 1 rat V-PLEX kit (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA). This 9-plex cytokine panel allows for the simultaneous measurement of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-ɣ, KC/GRO (CXCL1), and TNF-α (catalog #: K15059D, Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA). Samples were diluted in diluent 42 (1:2 dilution) and assays were performed using the standard MSD protocol. Cytokine plates were read using a Sector Imager 2400 (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA) and data analyzed using the MSD Discovery Workbench software v. 4.0 (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD). The lower limit of detection (LLOD) for the plasma samples was: (pg/mL): IL-1β: 8.06; IL-4: 0.40; IL-5: 9.95; IL-6: 22.40; IL-10: 4.20; IL-13: 0.62; IFN-ɣ: 0.58; TNF-α: 0.40; KC/GRO: 0.56; and hippocampal samples (pg/mg): IL-1β: 9.58; IL-4: 0.78; IL-5: 12.30; IL-6: 52.90; IL-10: 2.37; IL-13: 0.99; IFN-ɣ: 1.26; TNF-α: 0.48; KC/GRO: 0.86. Cytokines levels falling below the LLOD were assigned a value of 0.

2.10. Statistical Analyses

Dependent variables were plasma cytokine levels (pg/mL), percent change in plasma cytokine levels (change from pre-LPS to post-LPS), hippocampal cytokine levels (pg/mg), and hippocampal cytokine difference scores (baseline hippocampal cytokine average per group subtracted from LPS hippocampal cytokine level). Heatmaps and dendrograms were used to visualize overall cytokine profiles across groups (averaged per group; built on z-scored data), and were created using R software (version 4.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and the gplots package (version 3.1.3).
Outliers were identified using a z-score analysis (>|3.29|) and were Winsorized prior to statistical analysis. Cytokine levels were Blom transformed for statistical analysis [56]. IL-4 levels were undetectable in a majority of the samples, and were excluded from further analysis, with the exception of the heatmaps and dendrograms. Data that were normally distributed were analyzed using a 2 (Ethanol, Sham) × 2 (Choline, Saline) × 2 (Male, Female) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS; version 28.0.1.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). For plasma data, repeated measures ANOVAs were used when applicable. Post hoc analyses were conducted using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) Tests. Data that did not pass normality tests were analyzed using non-parametric analyses; these examined the main effects of Ethanol, Choline, and Sex (Mann–Whitney U) or group effects (Kruskal–Wallis H: Ethanol + Choline, Ethanol + Saline, Sham + Choline, Sham + Saline), with Chi-Square analyses for individual follow-up comparisons. Means (M) and standard errors of the mean (SEM) are reported when applicable. All significance levels were set as p < 0.05 and trends towards significance were set as p < 0.10. All graphs illustrate the Winsorized data.

3. Results

3.1. Blood Alcohol Concentrations

Mean ± SEM blood alcohol concentrations were 296 ± 8 mg/dL for ethanol-exposed subjects treated with choline and 304 ± 8 mg/dL for ethanol-exposed saline controls. There was no significant difference in blood alcohol concentrations between the two ethanol-exposed groups (F(1,37) = 0.4, p = 0.51).

3.2. Hippocampus Cytokine Levels at Baseline and after LPS Challenge

3.2.1. Hippocampal Cytokine Profile

Heatmaps were produced to examine overall cytokine patterns in the hippocampus across the four treatment groups: (1) Ethanol + Saline, (2) Ethanol + Choline, (3) Sham + Saline, (4) Sham + Choline (Figure 2). At baseline, overall hippocampal cytokine profiles were strikingly different between ethanol-exposed animals that did not receive choline supplementation and all other groups (Figure 2A), with the highest mean cytokine levels in the ethanol-exposed animals. After LPS exposure, groups that received choline exhibited different overall hippocampal cytokine profiles were compared to comparable groups that did not receive choline (Figure 2B). Interestingly, when clustering groups based on their overall hippocampal cytokine profiles, ethanol-exposed subjects that received choline were more similar to control animals (with or without choline supplementation) at baseline (Figure 2C). However, after the immune challenge, subjects that did not receive choline were more similar to one another than to choline-treated groups (Figure 2D).

3.2.2. Hippocampal Cytokine Levels

These overall patterns are further illustrated with examination of individual cytokine levels. At baseline, subjects exposed to ethanol had significantly heightened levels of IFN-ɣ (F(1,41) = 7.49, p < 0.01; Figure 3A) and TNF-α (F(1,79) = 6.85, p < 0.05; Figure 3C), with similar trends for increases in KC/GRO (F(1,79) = 3.07, p < 0.08; Figure 3E) and IL-6 (U = 750, p < 0.10; Figure 3G). Importantly, choline supplementation mitigated ethanol-related elevations in IFN-ɣ, producing a significant interaction of Ethanol*Choline (F(1,79) = 6.13, p < 0.05; Figure 3A). Following the adult LPS challenge, the hippocampal cytokine response did not differ in ethanol-exposed subjects. However, choline supplementation significantly reduced the pro-inflammatory chemokine KC/GRO (F(1,77) = 3.85, p < 0.05; Figure 3F) and tended to increase the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (U = 737.00, p = 0.08,; Figure 3I). There were no sex effects at baseline; there were a few main effects of sex following LPS challenge, but significant interactions of sex with other variables.
Difference scores were calculated to further examine cytokine responses after immune challenge while accounting for group differences at baseline. Interestingly, there were significant interactions between ethanol exposure and choline on IFN-ɣ (F(1,77) = 21.07, p < 0.001; Figure 4A), as well as the main effects of ethanol (F(1,77) = 6.46, p < 0.05), and choline (F(1,77) = 12.21, p < 0.001). Subjects exposed to ethanol without choline supplementation differed significantly compared to all other groups (p’s < 0.05). In fact, there was no increase in IFN-ɣ following LPS challenge in the ethanol-exposed group, whereas ethanol-exposed subjects that received choline supplementation showed significant increases IFN-ɣ level after LPS exposure, similar to non-exposed controls (p < 0.05).
Similar effects were observed in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-13, with an interaction of Ethanol*Choline (F(1,77) = 19.18, p < 0.001; Figure 4B), as well as the main effects of ethanol (F(1,77) = 19.30, p < 0.05), choline (F(1,77) = 7.15, p < 0.01), and sex (F(1,77) = 7.15, p < 0.01). In addition, there were significant interactions of Ethanol*Choline*Sex (F(1,77) = 4.87, p < 0.05) and Ethanol*Sex (F(1,77) = 17.24, p < 0.001). Choline supplementation mitigated ethanol-induced reductions in IL-13 after LPS in both male and female subjects (p < 0.05), producing significant interactions between ethanol and choline in both sexes. The pattern was more robust among females compared to males (Supplemental Figure S1).
Ethanol exposure also significantly blunted IL-6 (F(1,77) = 8.84, p < 0.01, Figure 4C) and IL-1β (F(1,77) = 4.69, p < 0.05; Figure 4D) responses after LPS exposure compared to non-ethanol-exposed subjects. Although the effects of choline failed to reach statistical significance, it is notable that levels of IL-1β and IL-6 in ethanol-exposed subjects treated with choline did not differ from that of either control group. Ethanol-exposed subjects also exhibited reduced TNF-α responses after LPS exposure (F(1,77) = 5.47, p < 0.05; Figure 4E) compared to non-exposed controls. Although ethanol exposure did not affect KC/GRO responses, choline supplementation (F(1,77) = 3.00, p = 0.08; Figure 4F) tended to reduce the response after LPS exposure.
The difference scores for the anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-5 and IL-10, showed similar effects of ethanol exposure and choline supplementation. There was less of an IL-5 response to LPS in ethanol-exposed subjects compared to non-exposed subjects (F(1,77) = 6.90, p < 0.01; Figure 4G), an effect driven by the ethanol-exposed subjects that were not treated with choline. In addition, responses were greater among choline-treated subjects compared to non-supplemented subjects (F(1,77) = 5.67, p < 0.05; Figure 4G). Although the interaction of ethanol and choline did not reach statistical significance, ethanol-exposed subjects that received choline supplementation had greater increases in IL-5 after LPS exposure compared to ethanol-exposed subjects that did not receive choline (p < 0.01). Similar effects were seen for IL-10 (Figure 4H). Few subjects had detectable levels of IL-10 at baseline (94% undetectable); however, all groups showed an increase in the number of subjects with detectable levels post-LPS (Fisher exact probabilities p < 0.05), except the ethanol-exposed group without choline. Non-parametric analyses confirmed differences that ethanol-exposed subjects without choline had less of an IL-10 response compared to all other groups, including controls (X2(13,42) = 42, p < 0.001) and ethanol-exposed subjects that received choline supplementation (X2(13,42) = 42, p < 0.001).

3.3. Plasma Cytokine Levels Pre- and Post-LPS Challenge

3.3.1. Plasma Cytokine Profile

In contrast with the hippocampal cytokine profiles, heatmaps of plasma cytokines showed that treatment differences were more evident following the immune challenge rather than at baseline (Figure 5). At baseline, overall plasma cytokine profiles show more similarities between ethanol-exposed groups compared with non-exposed groups, regardless of choline supplementation (Figure 5A,C). However, after an LPS challenge, there was a visible difference in plasma cytokine profiles with ethanol-exposed subjects that received choline showing overall reductions in cytokines compared to ethanol-exposed subjects that were not treated with choline (Figure 5B). Hierarchal clustering showed that groups that did not receive choline supplementation (with or without ethanol exposure) were more similar to one another than those that received choline supplementation (Figure 5D).

3.3.2. Plasma Cytokine Levels

Data illustrate that early postnatal choline treatment reduces select cytokine levels following an immune challenge. Choline reduced IL-6 (F(1,77) = 4.19, p < 0.05; Figure 6A,B), IL-1β (U = 611.50, p < 0.05; Figure 6C,D), and KC/GRO (F(1,77) = 4.21, p < 0.05; Figure 6E,F) elevations caused by LPS challenge. Although the interactions of ethanol × choline did not reach statistical significance, these effects were driven by choline-treated subjects exposed to alcohol.
Among plasma cytokine levels, there were some main effects of sex, with interactions with sex with other variables present in only two cytokines, IL-13 and IL-10. Interactive effects of developmental ethanol exposure, choline supplementation, and sex were observed in plasma IL-13 levels, yielding a four-way interaction of Time*Sex*Ethanol*Choline (F(1,77) = 4.37, p < 0.05; Figure 7). At baseline, males had higher IL-13 levels compared to females (F(1,77) = 11.33, p < 0.01), regardless of ethanol exposure or choline supplementation. Post-LPS administration, ethanol-exposed females who were supplemented with choline postnatally had lower levels of IL-13 levels compared to ethanol-exposed females only treated with saline (p < 0.05; Figure 7A), producing a three-way interaction of Sex*Ethanol*Choline (F(1,77) = 6.88, p < 0.05). Among IL-10 levels, a three-way interaction of Time*Sex*Ethanol was observed (F(1,77) = 4.06, p < 0.05, Figure 8). At baseline, female subjects exposed to ethanol during early development had greater IL-10 levels than their Sham-intubated counterparts (F(1,39) = 4.45, p < 0.05; Figure 8A), yielding a Sex*Ethanol interaction (F(1,77) = 5.72, p < 0.05), whereas no differences were observed among male subjects (Figure 8B). However, this effect was not observed post-LPS administration, and the percent change data also yielded no significant differences.

4. Discussion

The current study aimed to examine the effects of choline supplementation on peripheral and hippocampal cytokine levels in adult animals that were exposed to alcohol developmentally; animals were assessed both at baseline and after immune challenge. We found unique effects of ethanol exposure and choline supplementation on cytokine levels in the hippocampus and plasma. When examining the overall hippocampal cytokine profile, ethanol-exposed subjects generally exhibited elevated mean cytokine levels at baseline, such as IFN-ɣ, IL-6, TNF-α, and KC/GRO, with choline supplementation mitigating many ethanol-induced cytokine changes. In contrast, the overall plasma cytokine profile showed that choline generally blunted cytokine responses to an immune challenge, including IL-1β, IL-6, and KC/GRO. These results demonstrate that developmental alcohol exposure and early choline treatment have differential effects on the immune and neuroimmune system.
There is a large body of literature examining neuroimmune responses following adult or adolescent alcohol exposure [57,58,59]; however, the effects of developmental alcohol exposure on the neuroimmune system are understudied. In fact, only a handful of studies have examined the long-term effects (in adults) of developmental alcohol exposure on cytokine levels in the brain. In the present study, we identified several cytokines in the hippocampus that showed elevated levels at baseline (pre-immune challenge) in adult subjects exposed to ethanol early in development, including pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, KC/GRO, and IFN-ɣ. Many of these cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-ɣ, have previously been found to be elevated in the hippocampus in neonatal subjects exposed to either prenatal or postnatal (third trimester equivalent of human pregnancy) ethanol [10,11,12,13,60,61]. Our results indicate that such effects are long lasting, consistent with a previous study that found increased hippocampal IL-6 expression in adults prenatally exposed to ethanol [62]. Others have reported long-lasting effects of prenatal ethanol exposure on TNF-α, although they found reductions, rather than elevations, in ethanol-exposed subjects [17]. Collectively, these data indicate that there is a change in the hippocampal inflammatory state that is evident long after ethanol exposure.
Importantly, we found that ethanol-induced increases in IFN-ɣ were significantly mitigated by choline supplementation. In both physiological and pathological conditions, cytokine can be secreted from numerous cell types in the hippocampus, including neurons, microglia, astrocytes, and infiltrating peripheral immune cells (as reviewed in [63]). Increased microglial activation has been reported shortly after early alcohol exposure [11,12,13], but we have not yet elucidated the source of long-lasting changes in the cytokine within our model. IFN-ɣ levels in the hippocampus have been linked to hippocampal function and cognitive performance, with IFN-ɣ knockout models reporting increased neurogenesis, hippocampal plasticity, and improved learning and memory [64]. Moreover, increases in hippocampal IFN-ɣ can impair cognitive function, reduce neurogenesis, and increase other cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6 [65]. Importantly, in the current study, ethanol-exposed subjects that were given choline supplementation showed reduced IFN-ɣ levels that were similar to those of controls. Not only was choline supplementation able to rescue ethanol-induced increases in IFN-ɣ, even when given after the ethanol exposure; these changes were also long lasting, evident in adults long after choline supplementation had ceased. This mitigation of the ethanol effects is consistent with studies showing that postnatal choline supplementation improves hippocampal-dependent learning and memory following developmental alcohol exposure, using the same alcohol and choline treatment parameters as in the present study [29,30,31,32,33,34].
Developmental alcohol exposure has also been shown to affect neuroimmune markers in response to an immune challenge in adulthood (reviewed in [5,66]). Therefore, we examined the effects of developmental ethanol exposure and early choline supplementation on adult hippocampal cytokine levels after LPS exposure. We found that ethanol exposure blunted the LPS-induced cytokines release, specifically blunting the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFN-ɣ, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13. Importantly, choline supplementation was able to rescue most of the dampened cytokine responses to LPS challenge in ethanol-exposed subjects; specifically, ethanol-exposed subjects that received choline showed significant differences in LPS-induced levels of IFN-ɣ, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 compared to non-supplemented ethanol-exposed subjects. Levels of these cytokines in choline-supplemented ethanol-exposed subjects were similar to levels of controls. Likewise, although LPS-induced levels of IL-6 and IL-1β were significantly blunted in ethanol-exposed subjects, those that received choline did not differ from either control group. There have been limited studies on the effects of developmental alcohol on hippocampal cytokines in adults after an immune challenge. However, prenatal alcohol exposure has previously been reported to increase levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in response to an immune challenge of LPS [14] or alcohol exposure [17,67] in adult subjects. In contrast, Topper and Valenzuela (2014) found no effects of LPS on cytokines in the hippocampus of juveniles exposed to alcohol in the early postnatal period, but did find sex-dependent blunting of IL-1β expression in the frontal cortex [68]. Thus, although many studies suggest that prenatal alcohol exposure primes the neuroimmune system to be hyper-responsive to later immune challenges, the long-lasting effects may be variable. Regardless, these results show effects of developmental ethanol exposure on neuroimmune markers long after the ethanol insult.
In the plasma, there were limited effects of early ethanol exposure at baseline with increases in only one cytokine, IL-10, in females, regardless of choline supplementation. Although clinical studies have found alcohol exposure during pregnancy altered cytokine levels in maternal plasma [18,19,69], as well as the plasma of young children [20], to date, plasma cytokines have not been examined in adults exposed to alcohol prenatally. Similarly, limited preclinical studies have examined the effects of developmental ethanol exposure on plasma cytokines. A recent study reported no effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on cytokine levels in adult plasma, but did find altered cytokine profiles in other peripheral tissues (i.e., liver, spleen) [70]. Similarly, other preclinical studies have found limited effects of prenatal ethanol exposure on LPS-induced cytokine levels in adults [71,72].
At baseline, choline did not affect plasma cytokine levels. However, choline supplementation significantly blunted LPS-induced elevations of IL-6, IL-1β, and KC/GRO. Overall, choline-induced reductions in plasma cytokines after LPS exposure can be clearly seen in the heatmap of plasma LPS cytokine profiles (Figure 4B). These effects are similar to previous studies that also found choline supplementation reduced IL-1β and IL-6 plasma levels after LPS exposure [46,73,74]. Although there were no significant interactions between ethanol and choline treatments, examination of the data shows that these choline-related reductions in LPS-responses were driven by ethanol-exposed subjects.
In our current study, we show long-lasting effects of choline supplementation on both immune and neuroimmune systems. There are many possible mechanisms by which choline could act, including altered acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission, epigenetic modifications, and lipid metabolism [25,75]. Interestingly, there are known interactions between choline and immune cells, with choline acting as an anti-inflammatory modulator in many neurodegenerative and neurodevelopment models [40,41,42]. Choline is also a selective competitive agonist for α7nACh receptors that are found on both microglia and neurons. Activation of α7nACh receptors alters microglial cytokine production and release [76,77], as well as modulating memory and hippocampal plasticity [41]. Importantly, activation of α7nACh receptors can also affect peripheral immune cell function and modulate production of cytokines [78,79,80]. The ability of choline to activate α7nACh receptors is one possible mechanism behind the modulating effects of choline supplementation on immune and neuroimmune cytokine levels.
To date, few studies have examined the effects of developmental alcohol exposure on both peripheral and central cytokine levels [10,14,81]. As peripheral immune markers, such as plasma cytokine levels, are being investigated as potential biomarkers for fetal alcohol exposure [19,20], it is imperative to understand the long-term effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on peripheral cytokines. Moreover, it is important to examine the relationship between cytokine levels in the brain and the periphery, and to determine if plasma immune changes predict or reflect neuroimmune changes. In the present study, we found differential effects of developmental ethanol exposure in plasma and brain in adults both at baseline and after LPS challenge. Our results are similar to other studies that examined cytokines in both the brain and periphery in neonates exposed to alcohol prenatally, finding little to no overlap in cytokine levels between plasma and multiple other brain regions, including the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus [10], and amygdala [81]. Given that clinical data are limited to peripheral markers, careful consideration must be given before inferring similar changes in the brain. Clearly, additional research is needed to elucidate the relationship between peripheral and central immune markers and better understand how both peripheral and central cytokines may influence neurodevelopmental alterations seen in FASD.
Currently, choline supplementation is being investigated as an intervention to help reduce the severity of FASD [21]. Many clinical studies have examined the beneficial effects of both prenatal and postnatal choline supplementation on neurobehavioral and cognitive function in children with FASD [36,37,38,39]. Importantly, these improvements are seen years after choline supplementation has ceased, indicating long-lasting effects in these children [39]. The present data suggest that alcohol exposure leads to long-lasting changes in hippocampal cytokine levels, and that choline may attenuate the altered inflammatory state of the hippocampus, potentially improving hippocampal function and cognitive outcomes. Considering that choline also modifies plasma cytokine levels, it is possible that choline supplementation in children with FASD might also impact overall immune function [82,83]. For example, children and adolescents with FASD have increased rates of asthma and lung infections [84,85] and preclinical studies have shown that prenatal alcohol exposure disrupts immune function in the lungs [86,87,88]. Importantly, choline treatment reverses asthmatic conditions and reduces peripheral cytokines in an allergen-induced animal model [89]. Thus, choline can modify immune function in a number of ways. Given that altered immune function is observed in children with FASD, it will be critical to determine if choline also impacts the consequences of prenatal alcohol exposure for both immune function and health outcomes.

5. Conclusions

Data from the present study demonstrate that early choline treatment modifies cytokine levels, both at baseline and after an immune challenge, suggesting that early nutritional factors may have long-lasting effects on immune and neuroimmune functions. Importantly, choline also modified some of the effects of early alcohol exposure, even when administered after the alcohol insult. This suggests the possibility that the long-lasting cognitive improvements observed repeatedly in humans and animals perinatally supplemented with choline may be in part due to changing the inflammatory milieu of the hippocampus. Moreover, it will be important to determine if choline can successfully modify systemic immune responses and overall health outcome in individuals with FASD.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14142868/s1, Figure S1: Difference scores of hippocampal IL-13 levels in females and males following an immune challenge of LPS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.T. and J.W.; methodology, J.D.T. and T.S.B.; validation, J.A.B., K.R.B., T.S.B. and J.D.T.; formal analysis, J.A.B., K.R.B. and J.D.T.; investigation, K.R.B. and T.S.B.; resources, J.D.T. and J.W.; data curation, J.A.B., K.R.B. and J.D.T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.B., K.R.B. and J.D.T.; writing—review and editing, J.A.B., K.R.B., T.S.B., J.D.T. and J.W.; visualization, J.A.B. and K.R.B.; supervision, J.D.T. and J.W.; project administration, J.D.T. and J.W.; funding acquisition, J.D.T. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism R37AA012446 (J.D.T.), R37AA007789 (J.W.), R01AA022460 (J.W., T.S.B.), T32AA007456-38 (K.R.B.), and T32AA013525-20 (J.A.B.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of San Diego State University (protocol code 20-04-002T on 9 October 2018) in accordance with the requirements pertaining to animal subjects’ protections within the Public Health Service Policy and USDA Animal Welfare Regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author (J.D.T.)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Cristina Rodriguez, Samuel F. Deck, Samirah Hussain, and Annie Lei for helping with the acquisition of data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. May, P.A.; Hasken, J.M.; Hooper, S.R.; Hedrick, D.M.; Jackson-Newsom, J.; Mullis, C.E.; Dobyns, E.; Kalberg, W.O.; Buckley, D.; Robinson, L.K.; et al. Estimating the community prevalence, child traits, and maternal risk factors of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) from a random sample of school children. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021, 227, 108918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. May, P.A.; Chambers, C.D.; Kalberg, W.O.; Zellner, J.; Feldman, H.; Buckley, D.; Kopald, D.; Hasken, J.M.; Xu, R.; Honerkamp-Smith, G.; et al. Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders in 4 US Communities. JAMA 2018, 319, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roozen, S.; Peters, G.J.; Kok, G.; Townend, D.; Nijhuis, J.; Curfs, L. Worldwide Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review Including Meta-Analysis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2016, 40, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kable, J.A.; O’Connor, M.J.; Olson, H.C.; Paley, B.; Mattson, S.N.; Anderson, S.M.; Riley, E.P. Neurobehavioral Disorder Associated with Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (ND-PAE): Proposed DSM-5 Diagnosis. Child. Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2016, 47, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kane, C.J.M.; Drew, P.D. Neuroinflammatory contribution of microglia and astrocytes in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J Neurosci. Res. 2021, 99, 1973–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Deverman, B.E.; Patterson, P.H. Cytokines and CNS development. Neuron 2009, 64, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Noto, C.; Ota, V.K.; Santoro, M.L.; Gouvea, E.S.; Silva, P.N.; Spindola, L.M.; Cordeiro, Q.; Bressan, R.A.; Gadelha, A.; Brietzke, E.; et al. Depression, Cytokine, and Cytokine by Treatment Interactions Modulate Gene Expression in Antipsychotic Naive First Episode Psychosis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 5701–5709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krakowiak, P.; Goines, P.E.; Tancredi, D.J.; Ashwood, P.; Hansen, R.L.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Van de Water, J. Neonatal Cytokine Profiles Associated With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 81, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Agostinho, P.; Cunha, R.A.; Oliveira, C. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 2766–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bodnar, T.S.; Hill, L.A.; Weinberg, J. Evidence for an immune signature of prenatal alcohol exposure in female rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 58, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Drew, P.D.; Johnson, J.W.; Douglas, J.C.; Phelan, K.D.; Kane, C.J. Pioglitazone blocks ethanol induction of microglial activation and immune responses in the hippocampus, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex in a mouse model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2015, 39, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Boschen, K.E.; Ruggiero, M.J.; Klintsova, A.Y. Neonatal binge alcohol exposure increases microglial activation in the developing rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 2016, 324, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ruggiero, M.J.; Boschen, K.E.; Roth, T.L.; Klintsova, A.Y. Sex Differences in Early Postnatal Microglial Colonization of the Developing Rat Hippocampus Following a Single-Day Alcohol Exposure. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2018, 13, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Terasaki, L.S.; Schwarz, J.M. Effects of Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure during Early Gestation in Rats on Inflammation across the Maternal-Fetal-Immune Interface and Later-Life Immune Function in the Offspring. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2016, 11, 680–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chastain, L.G.; Franklin, T.; Gangisetty, O.; Cabrera, M.A.; Mukherjee, S.; Shrivastava, P.; Jabbar, S.; Sarkar, D.K. Early life alcohol exposure primes hypothalamic microglia to later-life hypersensitivity to immune stress: Possible epigenetic mechanism. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019, 44, 1579–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gano, A.; Prestia, L.; Middleton, F.A.; Youngentob, S.L.; Ignacio, C.; Deak, T. Gene expression profiling reveals a lingering effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on inflammatory-related genes during adolescence and adulthood. Cytokine 2020, 133, 155126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Doremus-Fitzwater, T.L.; Youngentob, S.L.; Youngentob, L.; Gano, A.; Vore, A.S.; Deak, T. Lingering Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Basal and Ethanol-Evoked Expression of Inflammatory-Related Genes in the CNS of Adolescent and Adult Rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahluwalia, B.; Wesley, B.; Adeyiga, O.; Smith, D.M.; Da-Silva, A.; Rajguru, S. Alcohol modulates cytokine secretion and synthesis in human fetus: An in vivo and in vitro study. Alcohol 2000, 21, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bodnar, T.S.; Raineki, C.; Wertelecki, W.; Yevtushok, L.; Plotka, L.; Zymak-Zakutnya, N.; Honerkamp-Smith, G.; Wells, A.; Rolland, M.; Woodward, T.S.; et al. Altered maternal immune networks are associated with adverse child neurodevelopment: Impact of alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 73, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bodnar, T.S.; Raineki, C.; Wertelecki, W.; Yevtushok, L.; Plotka, L.; Granovska, I.; Zymak-Zakutnya, N.; Pashtepa, A.; Wells, A.; Honerkamp-Smith, G.; et al. Immune network dysregulation associated with child neurodevelopmental delay: Modulatory role of prenatal alcohol exposure. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ernst, A.M.; Gimbel, B.A.; de Water, E.; Eckerle, J.K.; Radke, J.P.; Georgieff, M.K.; Wozniak, J.R. Prenatal and Postnatal Choline Supplementation in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. Nutrients 2022, 14, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zeisel, S.H. Nutritional importance of choline for brain development. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 621S–626S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zeisel, S.H. Is maternal diet supplementation beneficial? Optimal development of infant depends on mother’s diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 685S–687S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zeisel, S.H. Choline: Needed for normal development of memory. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2000, 19, 528S–531S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zeisel, S.H.; Niculescu, M.D. Perinatal choline influences brain structure and function. Nutr. Rev. 2006, 64, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blusztajn, J.K.; Slack, B.E.; Mellott, T.J. Neuroprotective Actions of Dietary Choline. Nutrients 2017, 9, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Derbyshire, E.; Obeid, R. Choline, Neurological Development and Brain Function: A Systematic Review Focusing on the First 1000 Days. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gamiz, F.; Gallo, M. A Systematic Review of the Dietary Choline Impact on Cognition from a Psychobiological Approach: Insights from Animal Studies. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thomas, J.D.; La Fiette, M.H.; Quinn, V.R.; Riley, E.P. Neonatal choline supplementation ameliorates the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on a discrimination learning task in rats. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2000, 22, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thomas, J.D.; Biane, J.S.; O’Bryan, K.A.; O’Neill, T.M.; Dominguez, H.D. Choline supplementation following third-trimester-equivalent alcohol exposure attenuates behavioral alterations in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 121, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ryan, S.H.; Williams, J.K.; Thomas, J.D. Choline supplementation attenuates learning deficits associated with neonatal alcohol exposure in the rat: Effects of varying the timing of choline administration. Brain Res. 2008, 1237, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Thomas, J.D.; Abou, E.J.; Dominguez, H.D. Prenatal choline supplementation mitigates the adverse effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on development in rats. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2009, 31, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Thomas, J.D.; Idrus, N.M.; Monk, B.R.; Dominguez, H.D. Prenatal choline supplementation mitigates behavioral alterations associated with prenatal alcohol exposure in rats. Birth. Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2010, 88, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Thomas, J.D.; Tran, T.D. Choline supplementation mitigates trace, but not delay, eyeblink conditioning deficits in rats exposed to alcohol during development. Hippocampus 2012, 22, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Grafe, E.L.; Wade, M.M.M.; Hodson, C.E.; Thomas, J.D.; Christie, B.R. Postnatal Choline Supplementation Rescues Deficits in Synaptic Plasticity Following Prenatal Ethanol Exposure. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Warton, F.L.; Molteno, C.D.; Warton, C.M.R.; Wintermark, P.; Lindinger, N.M.; Dodge, N.C.; Zollei, L.; van der Kouwe, A.J.W.; Carter, R.C.; Jacobson, J.L.; et al. Maternal choline supplementation mitigates alcohol exposure effects on neonatal brain volumes. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 45, 1762–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jacobson, S.W.; Carter, R.C.; Molteno, C.D.; Stanton, M.E.; Herbert, J.S.; Lindinger, N.M.; Lewis, C.E.; Dodge, N.C.; Hoyme, H.E.; Zeisel, S.H.; et al. Efficacy of Maternal Choline Supplementation During Pregnancy in Mitigating Adverse Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Growth and Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2018, 42, 1327–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wozniak, J.R.; Fuglestad, A.J.; Eckerle, J.K.; Fink, B.A.; Hoecker, H.L.; Boys, C.J.; Radke, J.P.; Kroupina, M.G.; Miller, N.C.; Brearley, A.M.; et al. Choline supplementation in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 1113–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wozniak, J.R.; Fink, B.A.; Fuglestad, A.J.; Eckerle, J.K.; Boys, C.J.; Sandness, K.E.; Radke, J.P.; Miller, N.C.; Lindgren, C.; Brearley, A.M.; et al. Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of choline for neurodevelopment in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2020, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pavlov, V.A.; Tracey, K.J. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Brain Behav. Immun. 2005, 19, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maurer, S.V.; Williams, C.L. The Cholinergic System Modulates Memory and Hippocampal Plasticity via Its Interactions with Non-Neuronal Cells. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wu, W.L.; Adams, C.E.; Stevens, K.E.; Chow, K.H.; Freedman, R.; Patterson, P.H. The interaction between maternal immune activation and alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in regulating behaviors in the offspring. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 46, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Jiang, X.; Jones, S.; Andrew, B.Y.; Ganti, A.; Malysheva, O.V.; Giallourou, N.; Brannon, P.M.; Roberson, M.S.; Caudill, M.A. Choline inadequacy impairs trophoblast function and vascularization in cultured human placental trophoblasts. J. Cell Physiol. 2014, 229, 1016–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kwan, S.T.C.; King, J.H.; Yan, J.; Jiang, X.; Wei, E.; Fomin, V.G.; Roberson, M.S.; Caudill, M.A. Maternal choline supplementation during murine pregnancy modulates placental markers of inflammation, apoptosis and vascularization in a fetal sex-dependent manner. Placenta 2017, 53, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. King, J.H.; Kwan, S.T.C.; Yan, J.; Jiang, X.; Fomin, V.G.; Levine, S.P.; Wei, E.; Roberson, M.S.; Caudill, M.A. Maternal Choline Supplementation Modulates Placental Markers of Inflammation, Angiogenesis, and Apoptosis in a Mouse Model of Placental Insufficiency. Nutrients 2019, 11, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Zhang, M.; Han, X.; Bao, J.; Yang, J.; Shi, S.Q.; Garfield, R.E.; Liu, H. Choline Supplementation During Pregnancy Protects Against Gestational Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Responses. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 25, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yu, J.; Zhao, W.X.; Du, C.Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, W.D.; Jin, S.Y.; Wang, H.; Feng, Z.G. Choline improves lipopolysaccharide-induced central nervous system inflammatory response and cognitive dysfunction in mice. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2017, 37, 600–606. [Google Scholar]
  48. Workman, A.D.; Charvet, C.J.; Clancy, B.; Darlington, R.B.; Finlay, B.L. Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 7368–7383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dobbing, J.; Sands, J. Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt. Early Hum. Dev. 1979, 3, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gil-Mohapel, J.; Boehme, F.; Kainer, L.; Christie, B.R. Hippocampal cell loss and neurogenesis after fetal alcohol exposure: Insights from different rodent models. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 64, 283–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Thomas, J.D.; Garrison, M.; O’Neill, T.M. Perinatal choline supplementation attenuates behavioral alterations associated with neonatal alcohol exposure in rats. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2004, 26, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Goodlett, C.R.; Johnson, T.B. Neonatal binge ethanol exposure using intubation: Timing and dose effects on place learning. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1997, 19, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Leeman, R.F.; Heilig, M.; Cunningham, C.L.; Stephens, D.N.; Duka, T.; O’Malley, S.S. Ethanol consumption: How should we measure it? Achieving consilience between human and animal phenotypes. Addict. Biol. 2010, 15, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Kelly, S.J.; Bonthius, D.J.; West, J.R. Developmental changes in alcohol pharmacokinetics in rats. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 1987, 11, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sengupta, P. The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human’s. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Blom, G. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta-Variables; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1958; 176p. [Google Scholar]
  57. Crews, F.T.; Sarkar, D.K.; Qin, L.; Zou, J.; Boyadjieva, N.; Vetreno, R.P. Neuroimmune Function and the Consequences of Alcohol Exposure. Alcohol Res. 2015, 37, 331–341, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Crews, F.T.; Lawrimore, C.J.; Walter, T.J.; Coleman, L.G., Jr. The role of neuroimmune signaling in alcoholism. Neuropharmacology 2017, 122, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guerri, C.; Pascual, M. Impact of neuroimmune activation induced by alcohol or drug abuse on adolescent brain development. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2019, 77, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Topper, L.A.; Baculis, B.C.; Valenzuela, C.F. Exposure of neonatal rats to alcohol has differential effects on neuroinflammation and neuronal survival in the cerebellum and hippocampus. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 12, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ahlers, K.E.; Karacay, B.; Fuller, L.; Bonthius, D.J.; Dailey, M.E. Transient activation of microglia following acute alcohol exposure in developing mouse neocortex is primarily driven by BAX-dependent neurodegeneration. Glia 2015, 63, 1694–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cantacorps, L.; Montagud-Romero, S.; Valverde, O. Curcumin treatment attenuates alcohol-induced alterations in a mouse model of foetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020, 100, 109899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Galic, M.A.; Riazi, K.; Pittman, Q.J. Cytokines and brain excitability. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2012, 33, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Monteiro, S.; Ferreira, F.M.; Pinto, V.; Roque, S.; Morais, M.; de Sa-Calcada, D.; Mota, C.; Correia-Neves, M.; Cerqueira, J.J. Absence of IFNgamma promotes hippocampal plasticity and enhances cognitive performance. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, e707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, J.; He, H.; Qiao, Y.; Zhou, T.; He, H.; Yi, S.; Zhang, L.; Mo, L.; Li, Y.; Jiang, W.; et al. Priming of microglia with IFN-gamma impairs adult hippocampal neurogenesis and leads to depression-like behaviors and cognitive defects. Glia 2020, 68, 2674–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Noor, S.; Milligan, E.D. Lifelong Impacts of Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Neuroimmune Function. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Terasaki, L.S.; Schwarz, J.M. Impact of Prenatal and Subsequent Adult Alcohol Exposure on Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression in Brain Regions Necessary for Simple Recognition Memory. Brain Sci. 2017, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Topper, L.A.; Valenzuela, C.F. Effect of repeated alcohol exposure during the third trimester-equivalent on messenger RNA levels for interleukin-1beta, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2, and interleukin 10 in the developing rat brain after injection of lipopolysaccharide. Alcohol 2014, 48, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sowell, K.D.; Uriu-Adams, J.Y.; Van de Water, J.; Chambers, C.D.; Coles, C.D.; Kable, J.A.; Yevtushok, L.; Zymak-Zakutnya, N.; Wertelecki, W.; Keen, C.L.; et al. Implications of altered maternal cytokine concentrations on infant outcomes in children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcohol 2018, 68, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bake, S.; Pinson, M.R.; Pandey, S.; Chambers, J.P.; Mota, R.; Fairchild, A.E.; Miranda, R.C.; Sohrabji, F. Prenatal alcohol-induced sex differences in immune, metabolic and neurobehavioral outcomes in adult rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021, 98, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, C.K.; Turnbull, A.V.; Lee, S.Y.; Rivier, C.L. Effects of prenatal exposure to alcohol on the release of adenocorticotropic hormone, corticosterone, and proinflammatory cytokines. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 1999, 23, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chiappelli, F.; Kung, M.A.; Tio, D.L.; Tritt, S.H.; Yirmiya, R.; Taylor, A.N. Fetal alcohol exposure augments the blunting of tumor necrosis factor production in vitro resulting from in vivo priming with lipopolysaccharide in young adult male but not female rats. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 1997, 21, 1542–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Fourrier, C.; Remus-Borel, J.; Greenhalgh, A.D.; Guichardant, M.; Bernoud-Hubac, N.; Lagarde, M.; Joffre, C.; Laye, S. Docosahexaenoic acid-containing choline phospholipid modulates LPS-induced neuroinflammation in vivo and in microglia in vitro. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pan, Z.Y.; Wang, H. Synergistic interaction between choline and aspirin against acute inflammation induced by carrageenan and lipopolysaccharide. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 20, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jiang, X.; West, A.A.; Caudill, M.A. Maternal choline supplementation: A nutritional approach for improving offspring health? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 25, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Egea, J.; Buendia, I.; Parada, E.; Navarro, E.; Leon, R.; Lopez, M.G. Anti-inflammatory role of microglial alpha7 nAChRs and its role in neuroprotection. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2015, 97, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Parada, E.; Egea, J.; Buendia, I.; Negredo, P.; Cunha, A.C.; Cardoso, S.; Soares, M.P.; Lopez, M.G. The microglial alpha7-acetylcholine nicotinic receptor is a key element in promoting neuroprotection by inducing heme oxygenase-1 via nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. de Jonge, W.J.; Ulloa, L. The alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor as a pharmacological target for inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 151, 915–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Gallowitsch-Puerta, M.; Pavlov, V.A. Neuro-immune interactions via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Life Sci. 2007, 80, 2325–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Benfante, R.; Di Lascio, S.; Cardani, S.; Fornasari, D. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors targeting the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: A new therapeutic perspective in aging-related disorders. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 33, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Raineki, C.; Bodnar, T.S.; Holman, P.J.; Baglot, S.L.; Lan, N.; Weinberg, J. Effects of early-life adversity on immune function are mediated by prenatal environment: Role of prenatal alcohol exposure. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 66, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Reid, N.; Moritz, K.M.; Akison, L.K. Adverse health outcomes associated with fetal alcohol exposure: A systematic review focused on immune-related outcomes. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 30, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gauthier, T.W. Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and the Developing Immune System. Alcohol Res. 2015, 37, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Oleson, D.R.; Magee, R.M.; Donahoe, R.M.; Falek, A.; Coles, C.D. Immunity and prenatal alcohol exposure. A pilot study in human adolescents. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1998, 437, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Libster, R.; Ferolla, F.M.; Hijano, D.R.; Acosta, P.L.; Erviti, A.; Polack, F.P.; Network, I.R. Alcohol during pregnancy worsens acute respiratory infections in children. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, e494–e499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gauthier, T.W.; Ping, X.D.; Gabelaia, L.; Brown, L.A. Delayed neonatal lung macrophage differentiation in a mouse model of in utero ethanol exposure. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2010, 299, L8–L16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Gauthier, T.W.; Ping, X.D.; Harris, F.L.; Wong, M.; Elbahesh, H.; Brown, L.A. Fetal alcohol exposure impairs alveolar macrophage function via decreased glutathione availability. Pediatr. Res. 2005, 57, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Gauthier, T.W.; Young, P.A.; Gabelaia, L.; Tang, S.M.; Ping, X.D.; Harris, F.L.; Brown, L.A. In utero ethanol exposure impairs defenses against experimental group B streptococcus in the term Guinea pig lung. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mehta, A.K.; Gaur, S.N.; Arora, N.; Singh, B.P. Effect of choline chloride in allergen-induced mouse model of airway inflammation. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 30, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of experimental design. Timeline and overview exposure groups: ethanol exposure from postnatal day (PD) 4–9 (left), choline supplementation from PD 10–30 (middle), and immune challenge of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on PD 60 (right).
Figure 1. Overview of experimental design. Timeline and overview exposure groups: ethanol exposure from postnatal day (PD) 4–9 (left), choline supplementation from PD 10–30 (middle), and immune challenge of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on PD 60 (right).
Nutrients 14 02868 g001
Figure 2. Overall hippocampal cytokine profiles. Heatmaps depicting overall cytokine profiles in the hippocampus in each group at (A) baseline and (B) after LPS immune challenge. Rows represent treatment groups and columns represent hierarchical clustering of mean cytokine levels (z-scored data). Additional dendrograms depict clustering of the treatment groups based on hippocampal cytokine profiles at (C) baseline and (D) after LPS immune challenge.
Figure 2. Overall hippocampal cytokine profiles. Heatmaps depicting overall cytokine profiles in the hippocampus in each group at (A) baseline and (B) after LPS immune challenge. Rows represent treatment groups and columns represent hierarchical clustering of mean cytokine levels (z-scored data). Additional dendrograms depict clustering of the treatment groups based on hippocampal cytokine profiles at (C) baseline and (D) after LPS immune challenge.
Nutrients 14 02868 g002
Figure 3. Hippocampal cytokine levels at baseline and following immune challenge of LPS. The following hippocampal cytokines are depicted in the graphs above: (A) Baseline IFN-ɣ (EtOH + Choline < EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05), (B) LPS IFN-ɣ, (C) Baseline TNF-α (EtOH > Sham, * p < 0.05), (D) LPS TNF-α, (E) Baseline KC/GRO (EtOH > Saline, ^ p < 0.10), (F) LPS KC/GRO (Choline < Saline, * p = 0.05), (G) Baseline IL-6 (EtOH > Saline, ^ p < 0.10), (H) LPS IL-6, and (I) LPS IL-10 (Choline > Saline, ^ p < 0.10). n = 19–24 per group.
Figure 3. Hippocampal cytokine levels at baseline and following immune challenge of LPS. The following hippocampal cytokines are depicted in the graphs above: (A) Baseline IFN-ɣ (EtOH + Choline < EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05), (B) LPS IFN-ɣ, (C) Baseline TNF-α (EtOH > Sham, * p < 0.05), (D) LPS TNF-α, (E) Baseline KC/GRO (EtOH > Saline, ^ p < 0.10), (F) LPS KC/GRO (Choline < Saline, * p = 0.05), (G) Baseline IL-6 (EtOH > Saline, ^ p < 0.10), (H) LPS IL-6, and (I) LPS IL-10 (Choline > Saline, ^ p < 0.10). n = 19–24 per group.
Nutrients 14 02868 g003
Figure 4. LPS-induced changes in hippocampal cytokines. Difference scores of cytokines after an immune challenge of LPS. There was an effect of ethanol exposure or choline supplementation on the following change in levels after LPS exposure for the following cytokines: (A) IFN-ɣ (EtOH + Choline > EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05), (B) IL-13 (EtOH + Choline > EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05), (C) IL-6 (EtOH < Sham, * p < 0.05), (D) IL-1β (EtOH < Sham, * p < 0.05), (E) TNF-α (EtOH < Sham, * p < 0.05), (F) KC/GRO (Choline < Saline, ^ p < 0.10), (G) IL-5 (Choline > Saline, * p < 0.05 and EtOH < Sham * p < 0.05), and (H) IL-10 (EtOH + Choline > EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05). n = 21–22 per group.
Figure 4. LPS-induced changes in hippocampal cytokines. Difference scores of cytokines after an immune challenge of LPS. There was an effect of ethanol exposure or choline supplementation on the following change in levels after LPS exposure for the following cytokines: (A) IFN-ɣ (EtOH + Choline > EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05), (B) IL-13 (EtOH + Choline > EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05), (C) IL-6 (EtOH < Sham, * p < 0.05), (D) IL-1β (EtOH < Sham, * p < 0.05), (E) TNF-α (EtOH < Sham, * p < 0.05), (F) KC/GRO (Choline < Saline, ^ p < 0.10), (G) IL-5 (Choline > Saline, * p < 0.05 and EtOH < Sham * p < 0.05), and (H) IL-10 (EtOH + Choline > EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05). n = 21–22 per group.
Nutrients 14 02868 g004
Figure 5. Overall plasma cytokine profiles. Heatmaps depicting overall cytokine profiles in the plasma in each group at (A) baseline and (B) after LPS immune challenge. Rows represent treatment groups and columns represent hierarchical clustering of mean cytokine levels (z-scored data). Additional dendrograms depict clustering of the treatment groups based on plasma cytokine profiles at (C) baseline and (D) after LPS immune challenge.
Figure 5. Overall plasma cytokine profiles. Heatmaps depicting overall cytokine profiles in the plasma in each group at (A) baseline and (B) after LPS immune challenge. Rows represent treatment groups and columns represent hierarchical clustering of mean cytokine levels (z-scored data). Additional dendrograms depict clustering of the treatment groups based on plasma cytokine profiles at (C) baseline and (D) after LPS immune challenge.
Nutrients 14 02868 g005
Figure 6. Early postnatal choline treatment reduces plasma cytokine release following immune challenge of LPS. There was a significant effect of choline supplementation, which reduced LPS-induced response in (A,B) IL-6 (Choline < Saline, * p < 0.05), (C,D) IL-1β (Choline < Saline, * p < 0.05), and (E,F) KC/GRO (Choline < Saline, * p < 0.05), an effect that was largely driven by ethanol-exposed subjects. n = 21–22 per group.
Figure 6. Early postnatal choline treatment reduces plasma cytokine release following immune challenge of LPS. There was a significant effect of choline supplementation, which reduced LPS-induced response in (A,B) IL-6 (Choline < Saline, * p < 0.05), (C,D) IL-1β (Choline < Saline, * p < 0.05), and (E,F) KC/GRO (Choline < Saline, * p < 0.05), an effect that was largely driven by ethanol-exposed subjects. n = 21–22 per group.
Nutrients 14 02868 g006
Figure 7. Sex differences in IL-13 plasma cytokine levels. (A) Females exposed to ethanol and treated with choline had lower IL-13 post-LPS (EtOH + Choline < EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05). (B) No effects of ethanol exposure or choline supplementation were observed among males. n = 10–11 per group.
Figure 7. Sex differences in IL-13 plasma cytokine levels. (A) Females exposed to ethanol and treated with choline had lower IL-13 post-LPS (EtOH + Choline < EtOH + Saline, * p < 0.05). (B) No effects of ethanol exposure or choline supplementation were observed among males. n = 10–11 per group.
Nutrients 14 02868 g007
Figure 8. Sex differences in IL-10 plasma cytokines levels. Females exposed to ethanol during early development had lower baseline levels of IL-10. (A) Baseline IL-10 levels in females (EtOH > Sham, * p < 0.05). (B) Baseline IL-10 levels in males. n = 10–11 per group.
Figure 8. Sex differences in IL-10 plasma cytokines levels. Females exposed to ethanol during early development had lower baseline levels of IL-10. (A) Baseline IL-10 levels in females (EtOH > Sham, * p < 0.05). (B) Baseline IL-10 levels in males. n = 10–11 per group.
Nutrients 14 02868 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baker, J.A.; Breit, K.R.; Bodnar, T.S.; Weinberg, J.; Thomas, J.D. Choline Supplementation Modifies the Effects of Developmental Alcohol Exposure on Immune Responses in Adult Rats. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142868

AMA Style

Baker JA, Breit KR, Bodnar TS, Weinberg J, Thomas JD. Choline Supplementation Modifies the Effects of Developmental Alcohol Exposure on Immune Responses in Adult Rats. Nutrients. 2022; 14(14):2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baker, Jessica A., Kristen R. Breit, Tamara S. Bodnar, Joanne Weinberg, and Jennifer D. Thomas. 2022. "Choline Supplementation Modifies the Effects of Developmental Alcohol Exposure on Immune Responses in Adult Rats" Nutrients 14, no. 14: 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142868

APA Style

Baker, J. A., Breit, K. R., Bodnar, T. S., Weinberg, J., & Thomas, J. D. (2022). Choline Supplementation Modifies the Effects of Developmental Alcohol Exposure on Immune Responses in Adult Rats. Nutrients, 14(14), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop