Next Article in Journal
The Role of a High-Fat, High-Fructose Diet on Letrozole-Induced Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome in Prepubertal Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Oral Administration of Bovine Milk-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Attenuates Cartilage Degeneration via Modulating Gut Microbiota in DMM-Induced Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Cruciferous Vegetable Intake and Bulky DNA Damage within Non-Smokers and Former Smokers in the Gen-Air Study (EPIC Cohort)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/nu14122479
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bifidobacterium adolescentis Is Effective in Relieving Type 2 Diabetes and May Be Related to Its Dominant Core Genome and Gut Microbiota Modulation Capacity

by
Xin Qian
1,2,†,
Qian Si
1,2,†,
Guopeng Lin
1,2,
Minmin Zhu
3,*,
Jingyu Lu
1,2,4,
Hao Zhang
1,2,4,5,
Gang Wang
1,2,5,* and
Wei Chen
1,2,4
1
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
3
Department of Anesthesiology, Wuxi No. 2 People’s Hospital, Wuxi 214002, China
4
National Engineering Research Center for Functional Food, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
5
(Yangzhou) Institute of Food Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Yangzhou 225004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2022, 14(12), 2479; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122479
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 9 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prebiotics and Probiotics in Metabolism Disorder)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing globally. Probiotics have been shown to be an effective intervention for diabetes. This study focused on the relieving effects and possible mechanisms of 16 strains of two dominant Bifidobacterium species (B. bifidum and B. adolescentis, which exist in the human gut at different life stages) on type 2 diabetes (T2D). The results indicated that more B. adolescentis strains appeared to be superior in alleviating T2D symptoms than B. bifidum strains. This effect was closely related to the ability of B. adolescentis to restore the homeostasis of the gut microbiota, increase the abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing flora, and alleviate inflammation in mice with T2D. In addition, compared with B. bifidum, B. adolescentis had a higher number of core genes, and these genes were more evolutionarily stable, including unique environmental tolerance, carbon and nitrogen utilization genes, and a blood sugar regulation gene, glgP. This may be one of the reasons why B. adolescentis is more likely to colonize in the adult gut and show a superior ability to relieve T2D. This study provides insights into future studies aimed at investigating probiotics for the treatment of metabolic diseases.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycaemia. Most cases of DM are type 2 DM (T2D) [1]. The T2D mainly manifests as insulin resistance, which, in turn, leads to obvious hyperglycaemia [2]. According to the latest survey results of the International Diabetes Federation, there are 460 million adults globally with diabetes (as of 2019). Based on this trend, the number of people with diabetes is likely to reach 700 million by 2045 [3].
Drug therapy is the main treatment for T2D. Biguanides and glitazones are traditional insulin sensitizers, and drugs such as sulfonylureas and non-sulfonylureas are traditional insulin secretagogues. The direct injection of insulin is also one of the methods used to treat T2D. In recent years, new initiators of insulin secretion, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have been used in the clinical treatment of T2D [4]. Drug treatment is effective, but it also has certain adverse effects, such as weight gain, gastrointestinal discomfort, liver damage, myasthenia, and sexual dysfunction. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find more effective and safer substances to treat T2D.
Previous studies have shown that disturbances of the gut microbiota are associated with a variety of metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [5]. Compared with healthy mice, mice with T2D show an increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroides (F/B) ratio and a decreased abundance of certain functional bacteria (such as Bifidobacterium). This is accompanied by an increased abundance of opportunistic pathogens and some lipopolysaccharide-producing gram-negative bacteria. Other studies have shown that the human gut microbiome changes before diabetes develops. Zhang et al. [6] detected and analyzed the fecal bacteria of 121 subjects in the three stages of (1) normal glucose tolerance, (2) pre-T2D, and (3) T2D using a 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing method. They found that the abundance of acid-producing bacteria, such as Akkermansia mucinipila ATCCBAA-835 and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii L2-6, was lower in the intestines of subjects with pre-T2D compared with healthy subjects, and they speculated that the presence of Verrucomicrobiae may be a sign of T2D. In addition, a decrease in the number of microbial communities in the intestines and a decrease in bacterial diversity, accompanied by an increased abundance of pathogenic bacteria and a decreased abundance of beneficial bacteria, may lead to low-grade chronic inflammation due to intestinal immune system activity [7], which further leads to insulin resistance.
Bifidobacterium is a genus of gram-positive bacteria and one of the most important flora in the human and animal intestinal environment. Studies have shown that the abundance of Bifidobacterium is significantly decreased in the intestines of T2D patients [8], and supplementation with Bifidobacterium (B. bifidum or B. adolescentis) alleviates gut microbiota disorders and lowers blood glucose concentration [9,10]. However, the two strains appear and dominate in the intestines at different stages of human growth [11,12]. Correspondingly, T2D mostly occurs in adults. Thus, we sought to determine whether these two Bifidobacterium species differ in their ability to alleviate the symptoms of T2D.
In this study, eight strains of B. bifidum and eight strains of B. adolescentis derived from different populations were selected to analyze the differences in their effects on T2D metabolic parameters and visceral pathology. We further detected the specific compositional changes in the gut microbiota and the accompanying changes in SCFAs content and inflammatory status to assess the mechanism by which Bifidobacterium alleviate symptoms in a commonly used T2D model mice induced by high-fat diet and streptozotocin (STZ). In addition, we also compared the core genomes to explore the factors responsible for the differences in the capacity of the two different Bifidobacterium species to alleviate T2D, thus providing a reference for the selection of probiotics that alleviate metabolic diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Bacterial Strains

All of the experimental strains were obtained from the Food Biotechnology Center of Jiangnan University (Table 1), and were cultured in modified DeMan-Rogosa-Sharpe medium supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine hydrochloride for approximately 16 h at 37 °C. The strains were then continuously cultured three times with a 1% (v/v) inoculum. The collected cells (8000× g, 5 min, 4 °C) were washed twice with sterile normal saline and then resuspended to 2 × 108 colony-forming units/mL for gavage.

2.2. Animal Experiments

Three-week-old male specific-pathogen-free grade C57BL/6J mice (Slack, Shanghai, China) were raised at the Animal Experiment Center of Jiangnan University under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at 23 °C ± 2 °C and 50% ± 10% relative humidity. After 1 week of a normal diet and water to allow adaptation, 114 mice were randomly divided into the following 19 groups (6 mice/group): control, model, metformin, and 16 Bifidobacterium-treated groups. The details of the design of the animal experiments are shown in (Figure 1a). Mice in each group were fed a high-fat diet (the control group was fed a low-fat diet) and were administered metformin or a Bifidobacterium suspension by gavage for 12 consecutive weeks. The feed and gavage formulations are detailed in Supplementary Material 1.1. On the first day of week 7, the mice, except those in the control group, were injected with STZ (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Mice in all groups were fasted for 12 h in advance, the Control group were intraperitoneally injected with 50 mmol/L citric acid-sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.5), the other groups were intraperitoneally injected with STZ dissolved in 50 mmol/L citric acid-sodium citrate buffer at the dose of 100 mg/kg·bw. Then, blood glucose levels were determined at 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 h. The area under curve (AUC) was calculated as follows: AUC = 0.25 × (G0 h + G0.5 h) + 0.25 × (G0.5 h + G1.0 h) + 0.5 × (G1.0 h + G2.0 h). All of the animal procedures were performed in accordance with the experimental animal management regulations of the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Jiangnan University (JN. No20190615c1261115).

2.3. Sample Collection and Processing

One day before the mice were killed, fresh fecal samples were collected in sterile 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and kept on ice throughout the processing procedure. After fasting for 12 h, the mice were intraperitoneal injected with a 1% pentobarbital sodium solution at a dose of 5 mL/kg, and blood samples were collected. The blood samples were centrifuged at 800× g for 15 min and the upper serum layer was collected. Pancreatic tissue was rinsed with normal saline precooled to 4 °C and preserved in formalin. Livers were weighed and divided into two parts, which were stored in formalin or liquid nitrogen. All of the collected samples were immediately stored at −80 °C.

2.4. Biochemical Analysis

The insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) was calculated using the following formula: HOMA-IR = fasting insulin concentration × FBG concentration/22.5. Blood glucose was measured with Roche glucometer and blood glucose test strips by means of tail blood collection with a blood collection needle. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglyceride (TG) concentrations were detected using commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The serum concentrations of insulin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Senbeijia Biological Technology, Nanjing, China).

2.5. Histopathological Analysis

Pancreas and liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). Stained pancreas and liver tissues were observed under a microscope with 400× and 200× magnification scale, respectively. All morphological lesions were rated on a scale of 1–5 by their severity according to the NTP Pathology guidelines. Tissue sections with no lesions were marked as 0. Pancreatic tissues were scored for exocrine and endocrine. The exocrine scores were mainly based on the morphology of pancreatic cells and whether there were vacuolar deformation and turbidity. The endocrine scores were mainly based on the number of islets, the shape of the islets, and whether the cells showed nuclear condensation. The final score was the sum of the exocrine and endocrine scores. The scores of liver tissue lesions were mainly based on the status of steatosis, including the size and density of fatty vacuoles in the liver tissue. The pancreatic tissue and liver tissue of each mouse were all scored in a blinded manner [13].

2.6. SCFA Analysis

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in the mouse fecal samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (1300-ISQ-GC-MS; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The extraction of SCFAs from mouse fecal samples and their subsequent analysis were performed as previously described [14].

2.7. Gut Microbiota Profiling and Bioinformatical Analysis of Genome

Total DNA was extracted from the mouse fecal samples using a Fast DNA Spin Kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and the amplified products were subjected to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis at 100 V for 30 min. The products were recovered and quantified using a DNA Gel Purification Miniprep Kit (Biomiga, Hangzhou, China) and 50 μL libraries were constructed based on equal mass concentrations. The libraries were then sequenced on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) [15], and the sequencing data underwent specialized bioinformatics analysis, as described in Supplementary Material 1.2.
The accession numbers of the genomic data used in this study are shown in Table S1, and the bioinformatical analysis of genome are detailed in Supplementary Material 1.3.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Experimental data were processed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between groups were analysed using least squares difference analysis with one-way analysis of variance, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. B. adolescentis and B. bifidum Show Differential Effectiveness in Regulating Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Disorders in T2D Mice

FBG and OGTT concentrations are the main diagnostic indicators of diabetes and are also the key indicators for measuring blood sugar status. One week after STZ injection, the OGTT of the T2D mice showed a rapid increase and then a slow decline, remaining high 2 h after gavage. Additionally, the area under the blood glucose concentration curve (AUCglucose) was significantly higher in the model group than in the control group (p < 0.05), indicating abnormal blood glucose metabolism and impaired glucose tolerance (Figure 1b–d and Figure S1). Supplementation with different Bifidobacterium strains showed different effects on high-fat-diet-and-STZ-induced increases in blood glucose concentration. Mice supplemented with B. adolescentis 8M4, 26M1, 34M4, or 2016 or B. bifidum 26M7 had lower FBG concentrations than mice without probiotic supplementation, and none met the criteria for diabetes. It is worth noting that most B. adolescentis also exhibited a strong ability to inhibit the abnormal increase in PBG concentration. B. adolescentis 26M1, 41M3 and 2016 significantly decreased the AUCglucose value and delayed the occurrence of glucose intolerance. After 5 weeks of STZ injection, the diabetic condition of the mice became more severe (Figure 1e–g and Figure S1). However, with the development of diabetes mellitus, the ability of B. bifidum strains to decrease PBG concentration was weakened (except for strain 9M10). In addition, based on the HOMA-IR values, most B. adolescentis strains improved the insulin sensitivity of the mice to varying degrees, while only 9M10 and 26M7 in B. bifidum strains showed improvement potential (Figure 1h,i).
Dyslipidaemia is a common feature of T2D and a major cause of its complications. Serum TG, TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C concentrations are usually used to determine blood lipid status. In this study, compared with the mice in the control group, those in the model group had significantly higher TC and LDL-C concentrations (Figure S1), which indicated that the T2D mice had abnormal blood lipid metabolism. Supplementation with B. adolescentis 3M10 and B. bifidum 5M8 decreased the concentrations of TG and LDL-C, and supplementation with B. bifidum 21M3 decreased the concentration of LDL-C. In addition, other Bifidobacterium strains, such as B. adolescentis 2016 and B. bifidum 26M7, showed a tendency to decrease the serum LDL-C concentration of the T2D mice, but this effect was not significant.

3.2. B. adolescentis Strains Showed Superior Potential Than B. bifidum Strains in Attenuating Pancreatic and Liver Damage in T2D Mice

A high-fat diet combined with STZ impaired insulin sensitivity in diabetic mice, and some Bifidobacterium species alleviated this effect. Therefore, we further investigated whether the administration of the two Bifidobacterium species also had a positive effect on pancreatic morphology, as determined by HE staining. The islet cells of T2D mice showed altered morphology and decreased number, and the cells appeared pyknotic, but Bifidobacterium treatment significantly improved these pancreatic lesions (Figure 2a). According to the pathological score of pancreas tissue sections (Figure 2b), all strains of B. adolescentis, except for 30M5 and 50M3, improved the fatty lesions of mice pancreata to varying degrees. However, only 2 B. bifidum strains were shown to prevent pancreatic damage.
In addition to pancreatic islet damage, the livers of diabetic model animals and clinical patients also have lesions. In this study, the weight of the mice with T2D and the control mice did not differ significantly, but the liver/body weight (%) significantly increased in the mice with T2D (Tables S2 and S3). The livers of the mice in the model group showed a large amount of fatty vacuole degeneration, but B. adolescentis treatment significantly improved these liver lesions (Figure 2c,d). However, the effect of B. bifidum on the liver fatty lesions in the mice with T2D was limited. In addition, B. adolescentis 8M4 and 2016 showed the greatest effect and also inhibited the abnormal liver/body weight (%) increase caused by T2D (Tables S2 and S3).
Besides, oxidative stress is closely related to the occurrence and development of diabetes and its complications, and there is a persistent vicious cycle between oxidative stress and disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism. The liver is the main site of oxidative damage in mice [16]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is the final product of lipid peroxidation, and its concentration may reflect the degree of lipid peroxidation in the body. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) reflects the ability of the body to scavenge oxygen free radicals. The hepatic MDA concentration was significantly higher in the mice with T2D than in the control mice, but the SOD activity was normal (Figure 2e,f). After the administration of B. adolescentis, hepatic MDA concentrations were decreased to varying degrees. Strain 2016 had the greatest effect, and this strain also significantly increased the hepatic SOD activity. While none of the B. bifidum strains, with the exception of strain 9M10, showed significant effects on oxidative stress.
Blood glucose-related indicators (blood glucose concentration, glucose tolerance, insulin resistance and pancreatic islet damage), blood lipid indicators, and organ fat deposition indicators were analyzed by principal component analysis, and the effects of the two bifidobacteria species on high-fat-diet-and-STZ-induced T2D were compared. B. adolescentis strains showed an advantage over B. bifidum strains in alleviating T2D symptoms, and some strains were more effective than metformin. None of the B. bifidum strains, except for 9M10 and 26M7, showed a significant remission effect (Figure 2g).

3.3. Bifidobacterium Strains Restore Gut Microbiota Homeostasis in Mice with T2D and Alleviate Symptoms

In view of the difference in the effects of the two Bifidobacterium species on the symptoms of mice with T2D, we sequenced the fecal microbiota of the mice to determine whether the observed difference was due to the modulation of the gut microbiota. A high-fat diet combined with STZ treatment resulted in a significant increase in the Shannon index and Simpson index values of the gut microbiota, and slight, but nonsignificant, decreases in the Chao1 index value and the number of observed species (Figure 3a–d). The administration of B. adolescentis strains, except for 26M1, increased the richness of the gut microbiota to varying degrees, and strains 26M1, 30M5, and 2016 inhibited the abnormal increase in Shannon and Simpson index values in the mice with T2D. While the administration of some B. bifidum strains resulted in a significant change in a single microbiota-related index value in the mice with T2D, the majority of B. bifidum strains showed no significant regulatory effect on the alpha diversity of gut microbiota. β-diversity analysis showed that a high-fat diet combined with STZ treatment led to significant changes in the microbiota structure of the mice (Figure 3e,f). After the administration of the Bifidobacterium species, the gut microbiota structure showed a transition towards the microbiota structure of the mice in the control group. However, this regulatory trend was not completely consistent with the ability of the Bifidobacterium species to alleviate the symptoms of T2D. Therefore, further analysis of the specific changes in the gut microbiota structure is required.
First, the effects of different intervention methods on the structure of the gut microbiota in the mice with T2D were analyzed at the phylum level (Figure 3g–m). The abundance of Firmicutes in the gut microbiota was significantly higher in the model group than in the control group, whereas the abundance of Bacteroidetes was lower in the model group. The F/B ratio and the abundance of Proteobacteria were also significantly higher in the model group than in the control group. Supplementation with Bifidobacterium strains increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria and restored the abnormally elevated abundance of Proteobacteria to varying degrees in T2D mice. B. adolescentis 26M1, 30M5, and 2016 significantly increased the abundance of Actinobacteria, with strain 2016 showing the greatest effect. In summary, the gut microbiota of the mice in the model group was imbalanced at the phylum level, and the two Bifidobacterium species had different alleviating effects on this imbalance. However, not all strains that alleviated the symptoms of T2D significantly modulated the changes in Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes abundance or the F/B ratio induced by a high-fat diet and STZ.
Second, differential analysis of the gut microbiota at the genus level was performed using linear discriminant analysis effect size and random forest methods. As shown in (Figure 4a–d and Figure S1), Anaerostipes, Coprococcus, Ruminococcus, and Bifidobacterium, which are generally considered to be SFCA-producing bacteria [17], were the marker genera for different B. adolescentis interventions. Moreover, B. bifidum strains 9M10 and 26M7, which exhibited the ability to alleviate T2D symptoms in mice, also significantly regulated the abundance of these genera. The significant effect of these strains at alleviating the symptoms of T2D may be related to the increased abundance of SFCA-producing flora. In addition, the genus Dysgonomonas, which is associated with intestinal inflammation, was a marker genus of B. adolescentis 30M5 treatment. The abundance of Dysgonomonas has been shown to be positively correlated with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [18].
Third, a combined analysis using the PICRUSt tool and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database was used to better understand the changes in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota induced by the B. adolescentis strains. As shown in (Figure 4e), B. adolescentis 3M10 administration was predicted to down-regulate ether lipid metabolism and the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptor signaling pathway. Previous studies have shown that the down-regulation of RIG-I expression leads to the inhibition of downstream signaling pathways, including the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-KB) pathways, which ultimately leads to decreased production of a series of pro-inflammatory factors [19]. Therefore, B. adolescentis 3M10 may reduce low-grade inflammation by down-regulating the RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway, thereby playing a role in relieving the symptoms of T2D. B. adolescentis 8M4 administration was predicted to significantly up-regulate the ubiquitin system, steroid hormone biosynthesis, steroid biosynthesis, and protein digestion and absorption pathways and down-regulate the flavone and flavonol biosynthesis and D-arginine and D-ornithine metabolism pathways (Figure 4f). The ubiquitin system is involved in multiple aspects of innate and adaptive immune responses, such as the regulation of inflammation and antigen receptor signaling [20]. Steroid hormone biosynthesis may affect the initiation of immune responses and may regulate immune cell function and inflammatory status [21]. The predicted results were similar for B. adolescentis 26M1, 41M3, 34M4, and 2016 and B. bifidum 26M7 (Figure S2). Other B. bifidum strains showed no particular functional trend. Overall, although these effective Bifidobacterium strains affected different pathways due to the changes they induced in the gut microbiota, they were all associated with effects on inflammation. Thus, although the specific effects of these strains on the gut microbiome were not identical and the pathways affected by the altered gut microbiome were not completely consistent, they may ultimately have a similar effect on inflammation.

3.4. Bifidobacterium Strains Alleviates the Symptoms of T2D via the Gut Microbiota-SCFA-Inflammation Axis

Low-grade inflammation is a common feature of patients with T2D, and there is much evidence pointing to a role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of T2D [22]. The predicted results of the alterations in the gut microbiota described in Section 3.3 also showed that the effective strains may relieve the symptoms of diabetes by regulating inflammation. An examination of serum inflammatory factors in mice revealed that a high-fat diet combined with STZ treatment induced inflammation, while supplementation with B. adolescentis strains decreased serum IL-6 (41M3 and 2016), TNF-α (3M10), or IFN-γ (26M1) concentrations and significantly increased the IL-10 (2016) concentration. B. bifidum strains 9M10 and 26M7 also decreased the serum IL-6 concentration in the mice with T2D (Figure 5a–d). In addition, the serum concentrations of proinflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ were significantly positively correlated with blood glucose concentration and HOMA-IR values and were weakly positively correlated with liver index values and pancreatic pathological scores (Figure 5e). These findings indicate that the effect of Bifidobacterium strains on improving the disorders of blood glucose metabolism and insulin resistance may be related to the alleviation of inflammatory symptoms.
In addition to inflammation, the microbiome analysis results also showed that strains that were effective at alleviating T2D symptoms in mice were also able to up-regulate the abundance of SFCA-producing genera. SCFAs participate in the regulation of energy homeostasis through the G-protein coupled receptor (GPR)41/43 pathway and have the potential to prevent or alleviate metabolic disorders, such as obesity and T2D [23]. As shown in (Figure 5f–i), the concentrations of several SCFAs were lower in the model group than the control group. The fecal acetic acid and butyric acid concentrations significantly increased after supplementation with B. adolescentis (3M10, 26M1, and 41M3) or B. bifidum 9M10. Moreover, the increase in SCFA concentration by these strains was consistent with their effect on decreasing blood glucose concentration. The concentrations of propionic acid and butyric acid were negatively correlated with blood glucose indicators and insulin resistance, and negatively correlated with serum IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations (Figure 5j). The acetic acid concentration was weakly negatively correlated with blood glucose indicators and insulin resistance, and negatively correlated with serum IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ concentrations. These findings indicate that the effects of Bifidobacterium species on hypoglycaemia and inflammation are related to their ability to increase the concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid.

3.5. The Greater Number and Stability of Core Genes, and a Unique Blood Sugar Regulation Gene May Give B. adolescentis an Advantage

To explore the differences in the ability of the two Bifidobacterium species to alleviate T2D symptoms in mice, we compared the genomes of 196 strains of B. adolescentis and B. bifidum, including 90 NCBI-derived genomes and the genomes of the eight strains used in the animal experiments in this study (Table S1). The average number of genes in the two Bifidobacterium genomes is similar (B. adolescentis: B. bifidum, 1767: 1736), but the B. adolescentis genomes exhibited a higher proportion of homologous genes (61.06%: 54.67%), and the number was 13.70% (1079: 949) higher than that of B. bifidum (Figure 6a,b). In addition to the genes clustered into 663 core orthogroups, there were 240 and 180 unique core genes in B. adolescentis and B. bifidum, respectively (Figure 6c). Moreover, according to the pan-genome analysis results, when the number of genomes reached approximately 25, the number of B. adolescentis core genes no longer fluctuated greatly, and the number of pan-genome genes in the 98 strains reached 6707. B. bifidum showed a greater amount of fluctuation in the number of core genes, but had a smaller number of pan-genome genes (only 5697) (Figure 6d,e). This indicates that B. adolescentis may have acquired more functional genes and stably maintained a greater number of core genes during evolution.
Clusters of Orthologous Genes and KEGG databases were used to annotate and cluster the core genes of these two Bifidobacterium species. As there appeared to be no significant difference between the two species (Figure S3), then we conducted KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The results showed a large number of B. bifidum core genes enriched in exosome and ribosome pathways, whereas genes enriched in transfer RNA biogenesis and exosome pathways had more significant functions in B. adolescentis (Figure 6f,g). For a more detailed exploration, we analyzed the unique regions (240 and 180 unique genes) of the genomes of these two Bifidobacterium species (Figure 6h–j). In addition to the organic systems class, B. adolescentis had more genes clustered in other KEGG pathway classes, especially the genetic information processing and human diseases classes. A greater number of genetic information processing genes (B. adolescentis: B. bifidum, 20:3) may be one of the reasons for the more stable genome of B. adolescentis. In the human diseases class, we found that the unique core genes of B. adolescentis were involved in the vancomycin resistance, cationic antimicrobial peptide resistance and antifolate resistance pathways, which may make this species more competitive in the gut environment. In addition, compared with B. bifidum, B. adolescentis had more genes involved in the two-component system, quorum sensing, biofilm formation and various carbon source and amino acid metabolism pathways, which appeared to confirm this competitive hypothesis (Table S4). Most importantly, a unique B. adolescentis core gene (K00688, glgP, glycogen phosphorylase (EC:2.4.1.1)), which was annotated in the insulin signaling, insulin resistance, and glucagon signaling pathways, may explain the involvement of B. adolescentis in the decomposition of glycogen and the regulation of glycogen and the blood glucose balance. It is worth noting that this gene is a core gene shared by the 98 strains of B. adolescentis but is not present in B. bifidum. Furthermore, we have attempted to generate multiple glgP gene knockouts, but have not been able to obtain stable mutants due to a lack of technical support for Bifidobacterium gene manipulation (data not shown). Therefore, although the presence of this gene is a potential reason why B. adolescentis alleviates the symptoms of T2D in mice, it requires more verification.

4. Discussion

In recent years, the incidence of T2D and the associated mortality has been increasing due to unhealthy lifestyle factors, such as a lack of exercise and a high-fat, high-sugar diet. Animal and clinical studies have shown that the abundance of Bifidobacterium species is decreased in the intestines of individuals with T2D, while the intake of Bifidobacterium may relieve the symptoms of T2D. Here, we selected 16 strains of the two dominant Bifidobacterium species in the human intestines at different life stages, and used mice treated with a high-fat diet combined with STZ to determine whether Bifidobacterium has potential for use in the treatment of diabetes. Meanwhile, the inter-specific differences in the effects of two Bifidobacterium species at alleviating diabetes-related indicators were analyzed.
A large number of animal and clinical studies have shown abnormalities in the intestinal flora of diabetic mice or patients [24,25], such as an increase in the F/B ratio. In this study, a high-fat diet combined with STZ led to the disruption of gut microbiota homeostasis and a decrease in the microbiota species richness in diabetic mice, whereas most Bifidobacterium strains reversed this trend. The predicted microbiota functions suggest that the effective strains may play a role in relieving the symptoms of T2D by regulating inflammation. In fact, T2D is often accompanied by persistent chronic low-grade inflammation and there is much evidence indicating that the immune system plays a role in the pathogenesis of T2D [22]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, disrupt the insulin signaling pathway, and cause insulin resistance. The anti-inflammatory factor, IL-10, inhibits these pro-inflammatory effects and plays a role in protecting islet cells and insulin function [26,27]. Inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α and IL-6, may improve insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis [28]. In this study, the strains that showed a strong hypoglycaemic effect also significantly decreased the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ to varying degrees in mice with T2D. Moreover, the concentrations of serum proinflammatory factors in mice were significantly positively correlated with blood glucose concentration and HOMA-IR values, and weakly positively correlated with liver index values and pancreatic pathological scores. These findings indicate that the effect of Bifidobacterium strains in relieving the symptoms of T2D may be related to the alleviation of inflammatory symptoms.
The ability of Bifidobacterium strains to modulate inflammation in the T2D mice appeared to be determined by their ability to modulate host intestinal SCFAs. Intestinal SCFAs are mainly produced by the fermentation of undigested carbohydrates by gut microbes [29]. Previous studies have shown that probiotics with significant hypoglycaemic effects increase SCFA levels in mouse feces [30,31,32]. Acetic acid, one of the major SCFAs, has been shown to control appetite and inhibit body fat accumulation [33]. A high-fat diet supplemented with butyric acid prevents insulin resistance and obesity in C57BL/6J mice [34], and butyric acid has been shown to decrease the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine and inhibit the activation of NF-κB signaling pathway [35]. In addition, propionic acid and butyric acid induce gluconeogenesis in the intestines to regulate energy production and maintain glucose homeostasis [36]. We found that supplementation with B. adolescentis 3M10, 26M1, or 41M3 or B. bifidum 9M10 or 26M7 significantly increased the concentrations of acetic acid and butyric acid. The increase in SCFA concentrations induced by these strains was consistent with their effects on blood glucose concentration, and SCFA concentration was negatively correlated with serum IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ concentrations. Thus, Bifidobacterium species may increase the concentration of SCFAs, thus alleviating the inflammatory state of mice with T2D and further alleviating diabetic symptoms [37,38]. The abundance of SCFAs in the intestines is closely related to the structure of the gut microbiota. In this study, the Bifidobacterium strains that were effective at relieving the symptoms of T2D also increased the abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria in mouse feces. Specifically, B. adolescentis significantly increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium [39] (26M1, 30M5 and 2016), Coprococcus [40] (8M4 and 34M4), Dorea [41] (41M3), Ruminococcus [42,43] (26M1), and Allobaculum (3M10). B. bifidum 26M7 significantly increased the abundance of Coprococcus, Roseburia, and Ruminococcus, and B. bifidum 9M10 increased the abundance of Coprococcus and Dorea to a certain extent. The ability of these strains to regulate the microbiota was consistent with the actual SCFA concentrations in the samples. This also explains the advantages of B. adolescentis 26M1, 41M3, and 2016 at regulating blood glucose metabolism disorders, alleviating insulin resistance, and decreasing inflammation. Thus, Bifidobacterium strains found to be effective at relieving the symptoms of T2D may do so through the gut microbiota-SCFA-inflammatory axis.
Overall, a greater number of B. adolescentis strains showed a stronger regulatory effect on T2D in the present study. However, it is unclear why these two Bifidobacterium species had different abilities to modulate inflammation and intestinal SCFA production in mice with T2D. An analysis of 198 genomes of these two strains showed that B. adolescentis has a greater number of core genes and these genes are more evolutionarily stable. These core genes may enable B. adolescentis to acquire greater viability than B. bifidum in the gut of the host (especially adult hosts) through increased bacteriocin secretion, antibiotic resistance, the utilisation of multiple carbon sources, amino acid metabolism, quorum sensing, and biofilm formation [9,10]. This increase in viability may enable B. adolescentis to more readily occupy a dominant position in the gut and may make it more capable of restoring the homeostasis of the gut microbiota and increasing the abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria in mice with T2D. Furthermore, all B. adolescentis genomes contained the glgp gene, which encodes a glycogen phosphorylase that participates in the degradation of glycogen and the regulation of the host’s blood glucose balance [44]. However, whether this gene plays a key role in B. adolescentis alleviating T2D symptoms in mice still needs to be fully verified.

5. Conclusions

We studied the effects of two Bifidobacterium species that are dominant in the human gut at different life stages on T2D. Overall, a greater number of B. adolescentis strains showed good potential for decreasing FBG concentration and alleviating insulin resistance. The strains that were effective at relieving the symptoms of T2D showed some commonalities. In general, those with a significant hypoglycaemic effect relieved inflammation in T2D mice to a greater extent than those without such an effect. This effect occurred through the Bifidobacterium-gut microbiota-SCFA-inflammation axis. Besides, the unique glycogen phosphorylase gene, glgP, in the core genome of B. adolescentis is a potential mechanism by which this species relieves the symptoms of T2D. This gene is a potential molecular target for future studies of the mechanism of action of probiotics in the treatment of T2D. These findings provide ideas for future studies to identify probiotics for the treatment of metabolic diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14122479/s1, Table S1: Genome data used in this study; Table S2: Effects of Bifidobacterium on body weight and organ quality; Table S3: Effect of Bifidobacterium on organ index; Table S4: Pathway statistics of unique core genes in two Bifidobacterium species; Figure S1: Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in T2D mice; Figure S2: Bifidobacterium treatment alters the diversity and the structure at the species level of the gut microbiota; Figure S3: Prediction of gut microbiota function in T2D mice after Bifidobacterium intervention; Figure S4 Functional clustering of core genes of B. adolescentis and B. bifidum.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.W. and M.Z.; methodology, H.Z.; investigation, X.Q. and Q.S.; data curation, X.Q., Q.S. and G.L.; visualization, X.Q. and G.L.; validation, J.L.; writing—Original draft, X.Q. and Q.S.; writing—Review & editing, M.Z. and G.W.; resources, G.W., W.C. and M.Z; supervision, H.Z. and G.W.; project administration, G.W; funding acquisition, G.W. and W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972052, 32021005, 31820103010), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JUSRP22006, JUSRP51501), the Program of Collaborative Innovation Centre of Food Safety and Quality Control in Jiangsu Province, the Project from Wuxi Association for Science and Technology (KX-21-B50).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Jiangnan University (protocol code JN. No20190615c1261115).

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are either shown in the manuscript and Supplementary Material or available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ezzati, M.; Vander Hoorn, S.; Lopez, A.D.; Danaei, G.; Rodgers, A.; Mathers, C.D.; Murray, C.J.L. Comparative quantification of mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors. In Global Burden of Disease & Risk Factors; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 369, pp. 241–396. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guariguata, L.; Whiting, D.R.; Hambleton, I.; Beagley, J.; Linnenkamp, U.; Shaw, J.E. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014, 103, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas, 9 th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Covington, P.; Christopher, R.; Davenport, M.; Fleck, P.; Mekki, Q.A.; Wann, E.R.; Karim, A. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tolerability profiles of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin. Ther. 2008, 30, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yan, F.; Li, N.; Yue, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhao, L.; Evivie, S.E.; Li, B.; Huo, G. Screening for potential novel probiotics with dipeptidyl peptidase iv-inhibiting activity for type 2 diabetes attenuation in vitro and in vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, X.; Shen, D.; Fang, Z.; Jie, Z.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.; Ji, L. Human gut microbiota changes reveal the progression of glucose intolerance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Microbiota associated with type 2 diabetes and its related complications. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2013, 2, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sedighi, M.; Razavi, S.; Navab-Moghadam, F.; Khamseh, M.E.; Alaei-Shahmiri, F.; Mehrtash, A.; Amirmozafari, N. Comparison of gut microbiota in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 111, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moroti, C.; Souza Magri, L.F.; de Rezende Costa, M.; Cavallini, D.C.; Sivieri, K. Effect of the consumption of a new symbiotic shake on glycemia and cholesterol levels in elderly people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Lipids Health Dis. 2012, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, J.; Wang, R.; Li, X.F.; Wang, R.L. Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplementation ameliorates visceral fat accumulation and insulin sensitivity in an experimental model of the metabolic syndrome. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1429–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Duranti, S.; Turroni, F.; Milani, C.; Foroni, E.; Bottacini, F.; Dal Bello, F.; Ferrarini, A.; Delledonne, M.; van Sinderen, D.; Ventura, M. Exploration of the genomic diversity and core genome of the bifidobacterium adolescentis phylogenetic group by means of a polyphasic approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 336–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Turroni, F.; Ventura, M.; Butto, L.F.; Duranti, S.; O’Toole, P.W.; Motherway, M.O.; van Sinderen, D. Molecular dialogue between the human gut microbiota and the host: A lactobacillus and bifidobacterium perspective. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pulavendran, S.; Prasanthi, M.; Ramachandran, A.; Grant, R.; Snider, T.A.; Chow, V.T.; Malayer, J.R.; Teluguakula, N. Production of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Francisella tularemia. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, G.; Si, Q.; Yang, S.; Jiao, T.; Zhu, H.; Tian, P.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Gong, L.; Zhao, J.; et al. Lactic acid bacteria reduce diabetes symptoms in mice by alleviating gut microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in different manners. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 5898–5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mao, B.; Li, D.; Zhao, J.; Liu, X.; Gu, Z.; Chen, Y.Q.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Metagenomic insights into the effects of fructo-oligosaccharides (fos) on the composition of fecal microbiota in mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Garidou, L.; Pomié, C.; Klopp, P.; Waget, A.; Charpentier, J.; Aloulou, M.; Giry, A.S.; Serino, M.; Stenman, L.; Lahtinen, S. The gut microbiota regulates intestinal cd4t cells expressing rorγt and controls metabolic disease. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Tang, K.; Deng, Y.; Chen, R.; Liang, S.; Xie, H.; He, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Q. Effects of shenling baizhu powder herbal formula on intestinal microbiota in high-fat diet-induced nafld rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 102, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sara, C.P.; David, P.; María, V.G.M.; Susana, M.F.; María, J.F. Beneficial effects of exercise on gut microbiota functionality and barrier integrity, and gut-liver crosstalk in an in vivo model of early obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dis. Model. Mech. 2019, 12, dmm039206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhou, B.; Liang, X.; Feng, Q.; Li, J.; Pan, X.; Xie, P.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, Z. Ergosterol peroxide suppresses influenza a virus-induced pro-inflammatory response and apoptosis by blocking rig-i signaling. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 860, 172543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, Y.; Jin, H.S.; Aki, D.; Lee, J.; Liu, Y.C. The ubiquitin system in immune regulation. Adv. Immunol. 2014, 124, 17–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Corsini, E.; Ruffo, F.; Racchi, M. Steroid hormones, endocrine disrupting compounds and immunotoxicology. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 10, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lontchi-Yimagou, E.; Sobngwi, E.; Matsha, T.E.; Kengne, A.P. Diabetes mellitus and inflammation. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2013, 13, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nie, Q.; Hu, J.; Gao, H.; Fan, L.; Chen, H.; Nie, S. Polysaccharide from plantago asiatica l. Attenuates hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and affects colon microbiota in type 2 diabetic rats. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 86, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, W.J.; Zhou, B.J. Imbalance of intestinal flora: A new target for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease treatment. World Chin. J. Dig. 2017, 25, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Horie, M.; Miura, T.; Hirakata, S.; Hosoyama, A.; Sugino, S.; Umeno, A.; Murotomi, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Koike, T. Comparative analysis of the intestinal flora in type 2 diabetes and nondiabetic mice. Exp. Anim. 2017, 66, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, N.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhu, X.; Cui, S. Kpnβ1 promotes palmitate-induced insulin resistance via nf-κb signaling in hepatocytes. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 71, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chang, Y.H.; Ho, K.T.; Lu, S.H.; Huang, C.N.; Shiau, M.Y. Regulation of glucose/lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity by interleukin-4. Int. J. Obes. 2012, 36, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Alipourfard, I.; Datukishvili, N.; Mikeladze, D. Tnf-α downregulation modifies insulin receptor substrate 1 (irs-1) in metabolic signaling of diabetic insulin-resistant hepatocytes. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 3560819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Garland, S.H. Short chain fatty acids may elicit an innate immune response from preadipocytes: A potential link between bacterial infection and inflammatory diseases. Med. Hypotheses 2011, 76, 881–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.; Wang, E.; Yin, B.; Fang, D.; Chen, P.; Wang, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Effects of lactobacillus casei ccfm419 on insulin resistance and gut microbiota in type 2 diabetic mice. Benef. Microbes 2017, 8, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aoki, R.; Kamikado, K.; Suda, W.; Takii, H.; Mikami, Y.; Suganuma, N.; Hattori, M.; Koga, Y. A proliferative probiotic bifidobacterium strain in the gut ameliorates progression of metabolic disorders via microbiota modulation and acetate elevation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, S.; Sharma, R.K.; Malhotra, S.; Pothuraju, R.; Shandilya, U.K. Lactobacillus rhamnosus ncdc17 ameliorates type-2 diabetes by improving gut function, oxidative stress and inflammation in high-fat-diet fed and streptozotocintreated rats. Benef. Microbes 2017, 8, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frost, G.; Sleeth, M.L.; Sahuri-Arisoylu, M.; Lizarbe, B.; Cerdan, S.; Brody, L.; Anastasovska, J.; Ghourab, S.; Hankir, M.; Zhang, S.; et al. The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gao, Z.; Yin, J.; Zhang, J.; Ward, R.E.; Martin, R.J.; Lefevre, M.; Cefalu, W.T.; Ye, J. Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes 2009, 58, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Aguilar, E.C.; Leonel, A.J.; Pelaez, J.M.N.; Lemos, V.S.; Silva, A.R. Butyrate impairs atherogenesis by reducing plaque inflammation and vulnerability and decreasing nfκb activation. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014, 24, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Vadder, F.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Goncalves, D.; Vinera, J.; Zitoun, C.; Duchampt, A.; Backhed, F.; Mithieux, G. Microbiota-generated metabolites promote metabolic benefits via gut-brain neural circuits. Cell 2014, 156, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, B.W.; Sun, W.L.; Yu, N.; Sun, J.; Yu, X.X.; Li, X.; Xing, Y.; Yan, D.; Ding, Q.Z.; Xiu, Z.L.; et al. Anti-diabetic effect of baicalein is associated with the modulation of gut microbiota in streptozotocin and high-fat-diet induced diabetic rats. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 46, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seo, B.; Jeon, K.; Moon, S.; Lee, K.; Kim, W.K.; Jeong, H.; Cha, K.H.; Lim, M.Y.; Kang, W.; Kweon, M.N.; et al. Roseburia spp. Abundance associates with alcohol consumption in humans and its administration ameliorates alcoholic fatty liver in mice. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 25–40.e26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Faraz, B.; Phillip, E.; Nailliw, P.; Yunus, T.; Ankur, N.; Maliha, S.; Marco, R.; Sherry, W.; Stefan, G.; Bruce, H. Dietary fiber treatment corrects the composition of gut microbiota, promotes scfa production, and suppresses colon carcinogenesis. Genes 2018, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jin, D.X.; He, J.F.; Luo, X.G.; Zhang, T.C. Hypoglycemic effect of hypericum attenuatum choisy extracts on type 2 diabetes by regulating glucolipid metabolism and modulating gut microbiota. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ratajczak, W.; Ryl, A.; Mizerski, A.; Walczakiewicz, K.; Sipak, O.; Laszczynska, M. Immunomodulatory potential of gut microbiome-derived short-chain fatty acids (scfas). Acta Biochim. Pol. 2019, 66, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, M.; Liao, Z.; Lu, B.; Wang, M.; Lin, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Liao, Q.; Xie, Z. Huang-lian-jie-du-decoction ameliorates hyperglycemia and insulin resistant in association with gut microbiota modulation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sung, M.M.; Kim, T.T.; Denou, E.; Soltys, C.M.; Hamza, S.M.; Byrne, N.J.; Masson, G.; Park, H.; Wishart, D.S.; Madsen, K.L.; et al. Improved glucose homeostasis in obese mice treated with resveratrol is associated with alterations in the gut microbiome. Diabetes 2017, 66, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Alonso-Casajus, N.; Dauvillee, D.; Viale, A.M.; Munoz, F.J.; Baroja-Fernandez, E.; Moran-Zorzano, M.T.; Eydallin, G.; Ball, S.; Pozueta-Romero, J. Glycogen phosphorylase, the product of the glgp gene, catalyzes glycogen breakdown by removing glucose units from the nonreducing ends in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5266–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 14 02479 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the regulation of glucose metabolism in T2D mice. (a) Animal experimental schedule; (b–g) OGTT and AUCglucose at 1 or 5 weeks after STZ injection, respectively; (h) Insulin level; (i) HOMA-IR. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 1. Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the regulation of glucose metabolism in T2D mice. (a) Animal experimental schedule; (b–g) OGTT and AUCglucose at 1 or 5 weeks after STZ injection, respectively; (h) Insulin level; (i) HOMA-IR. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Nutrients 14 02479 g001
Nutrients 14 02479 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the pancreas and liver of T2D mice. (a) H&E staining of pancreas (400×); (b) Histopathological scores of pancreas; (c) H&E staining of the liver (200×); (d) Histopathological scores of liver; (e) liver SOD level; (f) liver MDA level; (g) Principal component analysis of blood glucose and lipid metabolism related index and pancreas and liver pathology. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 2. Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the pancreas and liver of T2D mice. (a) H&E staining of pancreas (400×); (b) Histopathological scores of pancreas; (c) H&E staining of the liver (200×); (d) Histopathological scores of liver; (e) liver SOD level; (f) liver MDA level; (g) Principal component analysis of blood glucose and lipid metabolism related index and pancreas and liver pathology. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Nutrients 14 02479 g002
Nutrients 14 02479 g003 550
Figure 3. Bifidobacterium treatment altered gut microbiota diversity and structure. (a–d) Alpha diversity index; (e,f) PCoA plot based on beta diversity; (g–m) Relative abundance of different phylum. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 3. Bifidobacterium treatment altered gut microbiota diversity and structure. (a–d) Alpha diversity index; (e,f) PCoA plot based on beta diversity; (g–m) Relative abundance of different phylum. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Nutrients 14 02479 g003
Nutrients 14 02479 g004 550
Figure 4. Bifidobacterium treatment altered gut microbiota at the family and genus levels. (a,c) LEfSe analysis used to label biomarkers in all sample groups; (b,d) Random forest analysis of genus level differences caused by different treatments; (e,f) Prediction of gut microbiota function. C = Control, HFD = Model, M = Metformin, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 in the unpaired t-tests.
Figure 4. Bifidobacterium treatment altered gut microbiota at the family and genus levels. (a,c) LEfSe analysis used to label biomarkers in all sample groups; (b,d) Random forest analysis of genus level differences caused by different treatments; (e,f) Prediction of gut microbiota function. C = Control, HFD = Model, M = Metformin, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 in the unpaired t-tests.
Nutrients 14 02479 g004
Nutrients 14 02479 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the inflammation and SCFAs regulation of T2D mice. (a–d) IL-6, TNF-α, INF-γ and IL-10 levels in serum; (e) Correlation analysis between inflammatory factors and blood glucose and lipid metabolism and visceral indexes; (f–i) Acetate, propitiate, isobutyrate, and butyrate levels in the feces; (j) Correlation analysis between SCFAs and blood glucose metabolism index and inflammatory factors. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 5. Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the inflammation and SCFAs regulation of T2D mice. (a–d) IL-6, TNF-α, INF-γ and IL-10 levels in serum; (e) Correlation analysis between inflammatory factors and blood glucose and lipid metabolism and visceral indexes; (f–i) Acetate, propitiate, isobutyrate, and butyrate levels in the feces; (j) Correlation analysis between SCFAs and blood glucose metabolism index and inflammatory factors. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Nutrients 14 02479 g005
Nutrients 14 02479 g006 550
Figure 6. Genomic differences between two Bifidobacterium. (a,b) Homologous gene analysis; (c) Veen map of core genes; (d,e) Pan genomic analysis; (f,g) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis; (h–j) KEGG pathway cluster analysis of unique core genes.
Figure 6. Genomic differences between two Bifidobacterium. (a,b) Homologous gene analysis; (c) Veen map of core genes; (d,e) Pan genomic analysis; (f,g) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis; (h–j) KEGG pathway cluster analysis of unique core genes.
Nutrients 14 02479 g006
Table
Table 1. Strain information used in this study.
Table 1. Strain information used in this study.
SpeciesStrainNumberSourceCulture Conditions
B. adolescentisFJSSZ3M103M10Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisFGSZY8M4 (CCFM1108)8M4Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisFHNFQ26M126M1Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisFGSYC30M530M5Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisFXJKS34M434M4Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisFHNFQ41M341M3Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisFXJCJ50M350M3Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. adolescentisHuNan112 (CCFM1261)2016Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumFJSSZ5M85M8Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumFSDJN705 7-05Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumFXJCJ9M109M10Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumJSWX19M519M10Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumAHWH21M321M3Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumFHNFQ23M223M2Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumFHNFQ26M7 (CCFM1165)26M7Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
B. bifidumJSWX26726-7Human faeces37 °C, MRS, anaerobic
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qian, X.; Si, Q.; Lin, G.; Zhu, M.; Lu, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Chen, W. Bifidobacterium adolescentis Is Effective in Relieving Type 2 Diabetes and May Be Related to Its Dominant Core Genome and Gut Microbiota Modulation Capacity. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2479. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122479

AMA Style

Qian X, Si Q, Lin G, Zhu M, Lu J, Zhang H, Wang G, Chen W. Bifidobacterium adolescentis Is Effective in Relieving Type 2 Diabetes and May Be Related to Its Dominant Core Genome and Gut Microbiota Modulation Capacity. Nutrients. 2022; 14(12):2479. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qian, Xin, Qian Si, Guopeng Lin, Minmin Zhu, Jingyu Lu, Hao Zhang, Gang Wang, and Wei Chen. 2022. "Bifidobacterium adolescentis Is Effective in Relieving Type 2 Diabetes and May Be Related to Its Dominant Core Genome and Gut Microbiota Modulation Capacity" Nutrients 14, no. 12: 2479. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122479

APA Style

Qian, X., Si, Q., Lin, G., Zhu, M., Lu, J., Zhang, H., Wang, G., & Chen, W. (2022). Bifidobacterium adolescentis Is Effective in Relieving Type 2 Diabetes and May Be Related to Its Dominant Core Genome and Gut Microbiota Modulation Capacity. Nutrients, 14(12), 2479. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122479

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop