Next Article in Journal
Study on Reference Range of Zinc, Copper and Copper/Zinc Ratio in Childbearing Women of China
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Behavior Change Skills in Health Extension Workers in Ethiopia: Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Maternal and Infant Nutrition
Previous Article in Journal
The Joint Effects of Diet and Dietary Supplements in Relation to Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease over a 10-Year Follow-Up: A Longitudinal Study of 69,990 Participants in Australia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nutrition Transition with Accelerating Urbanization? Empirical Evidence from Rural China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Food Insecurity Systematic Review: Experience from Malaysia

1
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeing), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Research Centre of Excellence, Nutrition and Non-Communicable Diseases (NNCD), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
5
Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(3), 945; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030945
Submission received: 2 January 2021 / Revised: 4 March 2021 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 15 March 2021

Abstract

:
Living free from hunger is a basic human right. However, some communities still experience household food insecurity. This systematic literature review explored different aspects of household food insecurity in Malaysia including vulnerable groups, prevalence, risk factors, coping strategies, and the consequences of food insecurity. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Thirty-three relevant articles were selected from scientific databases such as CINAHL, Pubmed and Google Scholar, scrutiny of reference lists, and personal communication with experts in the field. The prevalence of household food insecurity in Malaysia was unexpectedly reported as high, with affected groups including Orang Asli, low-income household/welfare-recipient households, university students, and the elderly. Demographic risk factors and socioeconomic characteristics included larger household, living in poverty, and low education. Coping strategies were practices to increase the accessibility of food in their households. Consequences of household food insecurity included psychological, dietary (macro- and micronutrient intakes), nutritional status, and health impacts. In conclusion, this review confirmed that household food insecurity in Malaysia continues to exist. Nevertheless, extensive and active investigations are encouraged to obtain a more holistic and comprehensive picture pertaining to household food security in Malaysia.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

There are approximately 200 definitions of food security [1,2], with the most widely used definition:
‘Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life’
[3]
The definition of food security is multidimensional, built on four ‘pillars’, namely physical availability of food, economic and physical access to food, food utilization, and stability of the three dimensions over time [4].
Food insecurity exists whenever “the availability of nutritional adequate and safe foods or ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways is limited or uncertain” [5]. The importance of addressing food insecurity has been recognised through the second goal of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030 [6].
Food security has been recognized as a significant concern at the global, national, community, household and individual levels. In 2019, despite experiencing stable global food production, the FAO projected that 687.8 million people (8.9%) or one in every ten people in the world are undernourished, while 750 million people (9.7%) worldwide were experiencing severe food insecurity [7]. In several countries, particularly high-income countries, food insecurity is monitored regularly by incorporating surveys into national nutritional surveillance systems [8,9]. Food insecurity was reported as affecting approximately one in ten households (12.3%) in the U.S. [8], and 6.0% of households in Canada [9].
Another approach in studying food security has been to focus on vulnerable populations, particularly those with low socioeconomic characteristic, living in poverty and in regional or remote areas. Vulnerable populations have much higher rates of food insecurity. For example, in Puerto Rico, 40.0% of low-income households were categorized as food insecure [10]. In Alagoas, one of the poorest states in Brazil, 58.3% of households were food insecure, of which 33.1% were categorized as mild, 17.9% as moderate, and 7.3% as severe [11]. Further, in the rural area of Limpopo Province, South Africa, 53.0% of households were identified as severely household food insecure [12]. Meanwhile, a high prevalence of household food insecurity was also observed in urban households. According to a study that was conducted among rural and urban American Indian households with young children, food insecurity was reported among 44.6% rural households and 79.5% urban households [13]. Moreover, another study at Ibadan metropolis, Oyo state, Nigeria reported that 29.3% of households were food insecure [14]. The high prevalence of food insecurity globally provides solid evidence that these issues require immediate attention, particularly among disadvantaged groups.
Food insecurity has negative consequences on the health of populations, primarily due to poor dietary intakes and low dietary diversity patterns of food-insecure populations [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Examples of the unhealthy behaviours included high fat consumption [24], higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, red/processed meat, and nuts, seeds and legumes but lower consumption of vegetables and sweet and bakery desserts [16,25], and lower intakes in marco- and micronutrients [26].
Importantly, food insecurity has been found to have consequences on nutritional status and health among children and adults. In children, mixed results were reported regarding the relationships between household food insecurity and nutritional status. Food insecurity is associated with underweight among preschool children in Antioquia, Colombia, low-income Hispanic immigrant children in Houston, the U.S., and school children in Bogotá, Colombia [19,27,28]. In wealthy countries, children experiencing persistent household food insecurity are more likely to develop obesity [29], though this is not consistently reported [30]. Significant lower physical function also has been reported among children aged 3 to 8 years in food-insecure households, and lower psychological function among children aged 12 to 17 years [31]. These impacts are present even with mild household food insecurity [32] and with children during early childhood and until middle childhood. The impacts on children in food-insecure households can be devastating, including quality of food, quantity of food, psychological aspects, and social aspects [33].
Household food insecurity also impacts the nutritional status and health of adult women. Hunger in poor countries is significantly associated with underweight [19,34], and overweight in wealthy countries [35,36]. Other aspects of health status impacted include anemia [37], hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and relative risk diabetes [38], and psychological impacts such as parental practices and depression [39]. Other groups at high risk of food insecurity include the elderly [40,41], refugees [42,43], Indigenous Peoples [44], and university students [45,46]. In addition to the adverse effects of food insecurity, affected groups also spend more for their health costs [47].
Risk factors for food insecurity include any factor that limits household resources such as money, time, information, health or even the proportion of those resources available for food acquisition. Other risk factors include those that limit employment opportunities, wage and benefit scales and social assistance benefits, or increased non-discretionary non-food expenditure such as the cost of housing and utilities, health care, taxes, childcare and the likelihood of emergencies [48]. There is also a relationship between food insecurity and poverty [49], lower per-capita income [50], lower household income, sources of income [51], households headed by females [52], chronic diseases [53], greater number of children, and lower education of mothers [54].
The physical environment also plays an important role in determining food security status. Two common factors are presence of food outlets nearby [55] and road connectivity [56,57]. For farmers or rural populations, failure in agricultural activities due to lack of arable lands [58,59] and damages caused by pests [60,61] directly influence the amount of food produced and impact their income. Food security status of the Indigenous Peoples was related to their own specific surrounding environments and lifestyles, including abandonment of traditional practices (reduced hunting of traditional food, unaffordable harvesting tools, loss of cultural hunting activities, and lack of time due to employment) and deterioration of the surrounding environment (worry over contamination of traditional foods, serious deforestation, politic instability, and contamination of water supply), and changing of lifestyles due to acculturation (loss of traditional knowledge and change in agricultural practices or higher access to western food) [62,63].
Food is a fundamental human right, as per article 25 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [64]. In line with the second goal of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to eliminate hunger and ensure all people including poor and at-risk peoples have access to safe, nutritious and sufficient food by 2030 [6], it is expected that food insecuritywill be eliminated worldwide. Governments have an obligation not to interfere with the efforts of their citizens to attain food, provide protection when there is an infringement on rights of food, and provide opportunities to aid citizens in food attainment [65].
Malaysia is a multiethnic country located in the South East Asia region, with an area coverage total landmass of 329,847 km2. Recent efforts to diversify the economics of Malaysia have been successful [66], with average growth at 5.4% from 2010 to 2018. The poverty rate in Malaysia is low, at less than one percent. However, the data released were questionable as the previous Poverty Line Income (PLI) at MYR 980 (=USD 243) per household [67] was considered too low. Recently, in 2020, the PLI was revised, with an increment from MYR 980 (=USD 243) to MYR 2208 (=USD 547) per household. Under the new PLI, the poverty rate in Malaysia was expected to be at 5.6% [67]. The attention of the government is now directed to improve the quality of life among the poorest bottom 40 group (bottom 40 per cent household income group who possesses only 16.4% of the income share) who are believed to be less resilient towards economic shocks [68,69]. Based on the information that was released by the Department of Statistics Malaysia, the median income for Malaysia in 2019 was MYR 5873 (=USD 1455), MYR 3166 (=USD 784) among the bottom 40 group, MYR 7093 (=USD 1757) among the middle 40 group, and MYR 15,301 (=USD 3791) among the top 20 group [68]. Regarding ethnicity distribution in Malaysia, 67.4% were Bumiputera, 24.6% Chinese, 7.3% Indians, and 0.7% others [69]. Orang Asli was grouped under Bumiputera and represented 0.7% of the Malaysia population [70]. Based on data released by the Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, the incidence of relative poverty for Bumiputera, Chinese, Indians, and others in 2019 was 18.8%, 12.3%, 15.4%, and 27.9%, respectively; further, the incidence of absolute poverty for the same groups in 2019 was 7.2%, 1.4%, 4.8%, and 13.5%, respectively [71]. The data reflected that there is a huge income gap in Malaysia.
Since 1994, three series of the National Plan of Action for Nutrition for Malaysia (NPANM I to NPANM III) were established to improve the nutritional well-being of Malaysians [72,73,74] and to eradicate household food insecurity, nutritional deficiencies and malnutrition. The current NPANM III (2016–2025) has focused on food and nutrition security to promote healthy eating through increasing food quantity and quality, increasing purchasing power of food as well as reducing unhealthy eating behaviours such as skipping meals and reducing portion size [74].
In conclusion, poverty is still a major concern in Malaysia, despite excellent economic progression [67,75]. The low monthly household incomes might not sustain a stable life as prices of food and other necessities keep increasing (inflation), particularly among low-income households with single working parents and with an income of minimum wage of MYR 1100 (USD 272.65). Such observation are obvious among households in big cities such as Kuala Lumpur, Penang, Johor Bahru, Kuching, and Kota Kinabalu (urban poor) [75,76]. Attention to poverty is required due to its high association with household food insecurity in terms of purchasing power [48,49,50,51]. Similar situations are observed among single-income households, of which 89.4% of households with single working mothers were mostly categorized in the B40 group (bottom 40% of income earners). According to the Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey, the B40 group only shared 16.0% of the total income. The proportion was much lower when compared to 46.8% among the T20 group (top 20% of income earners) and 37.2% among the M40 group (middle 40% of income earners) [68]. In addition, low education levels may lead to household food insecurity, with 83.7% of the single mothers in Peninsular Malaysia having only secondary education or less [77]. Similarly, for minor ethnic groups such as Indigenous Peoples, access to education is still a concern, with high dropout rates being reported. Lack of education prevents finding a better job that can improve socioeconomic status and thus increase quality of life [78]. This might help to explain the high prevalence of household food insecurity among single mothers and Indigenous Peoples. With all the mentioned factors, Malaysia is not shielded from food insecurity, particularly at the household and individual levels. This is reflected through othe dual burden of malnutrition, micronutriens deficiencies and diet-related non-communicable diseases in Malaysia, with undernutrition remaining high [79]. The prevalence of stunting among children younger than five years old was reported to be 17.2% in 2006 and it increased to 20.7% in 2016 [79]. Micronutrient deficiencies were still a problem and the problem was given yet lower power priority when compared to overnutrition [79]. In this case, household food security becomes a topic of interest as it might be a solution to all the nutrition problems in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to provide an overall view of issues relating to household and individual food insecurity in Malaysia. Issues explored include the prevalence of household food insecurity, vulnerable groups, contributing factors of household food insecurity, coping strategies during household food insecurity, and consequences of household food insecurity. Additionally, we explored the instruments or indicators used to determine or report on household food insecurity. In this case, this systematic review is expected to answer several questions regarding food security issues among Malaysians:
(a)
What was the prevalence of food insecurity in Malaysia according to studies conducted there?
(b)
Who were the high-risk groups of household food insecurity in Malaysia?
(c)
What were common instruments used to assess food insecurity in Malaysia?
(d)
What were the common contributing factors to rather than of food insecurity among Malaysians?
(e)
What were the coping strategies practised by food-insecure households in Malaysia?
(f)
What were consequences of food insecurity reported among Malaysians?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This systematic literature review followed the guidelines proposed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [80]. Firstly, several worldwide electronic databases were searched, including PubMed and CINAHL [81]. The descriptors for the search were ‘food insecurity’ or ‘food security’ AND ‘Malaysia’. Secondly, to maximize the number of available articles, a search was also carried out on Google Scholar using similar descriptors. Thirdly, a researcher scrutinized the reference sections of all relevant articles retrieved to detect any further published articles not identified during the database searches [81]. Fourthly, journal articles were obtained through personal communication with experts in the field [82]. Two authors screened all titles and abstracts of the selected articles in order to filter out irrelevant and duplicated articles.

2.2. Selection Criteria

One independent researcher (N.S.) read the full articles. Inclusion criteria included (a) original/primary peer-reviewed journal articles; (b) the terms ‘food insecurity’ or ‘food security’ were clearly defined; (c) household and individual food insecurity were prioritized; (d) indicators to measure food insecurity were clearly defined; (e) the study was conducted in Malaysia; (f) written in the English or Malay languages; (g) conducted by local or foreign researchers; and (h) articles that were published from January 2000 to December 2020. No limitation was set for target population or age groups. With all the criteria applied, 46 articles qualified for review. The chosen articles were reviewed by a second independent researcher (L.L.S.). The final decision on the selection of articles was made based on the consensus of the researchers through discussion. In the process, two full articles were excluded as the two articles focused on the national and community levels of food insecurity, that is the availability dimension, which violated inclusion criterion (c).

2.3. Data Extraction

Information from each of the selected articles was extracted by an independent researcher (N.S.). Another member of the research team (L.L.S.) screened the information in order to clarify that the information extracted was accurate. Firstly, the articles were categorized based on target groups of the studies and then details were extracted relating to the publications (authors and year of publication) and the studies (study designs, respondents, study location, and instruments used to measure household food security). The studies were divided into four components based on the scope of the studies, namely prevalence, contributing factors of household food insecurity, coping strategies during household and individual food insecurity, and consequences of household food insecurity.

2.4. Risk of Bias Assessment

The quality of the articles was assessed by two authors (N.S. and L.L.S.) using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for use in JBI systematic reviews [83]. Scores were given based on the consensus that was reached between two authors. The quality of the articles was assessed against quantitative and qualitative checklists, respectively [84,85]. The quality of cross-sectional studies was based on the level of detail provided for inclusion criteria, descriptions of the respondents, assessments of exposures and outcomes, elaboration on confounding variables, and statistical analysis (Table 1).
The quality of studies utilising qualitative research was assessed against a number of criteria, including congruities between the philosophical perspective and methodology; methodology and research objectives; methodology and methods for collecting data; methodology and analysis of data; methodology and interpretation of results; presence of a statement to locate the researcher culturally or theoretically; the influence of the researcher on research; representative of participants and their voices; information on ethical approval; and construction of the conclusion based on interpretation of data needed to be elaborated clearly (Table 2).

3. Results

The systematic review included 46 articles after removal of the irrelevant and duplicated articles. Figure 1 illustrates the selection processes.
For quantitative studies, 17 articles (40.5%) met six and more items (high quality) in the risk of bias checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies, while another 18 articles (42.9%) fulfilled three to five items (fair quality). Finally, seven articles (16.7%) met less than three items. The studies that met the criteria of the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Meanwhile, for qualitative studies, two articles met eight items in the risk of bias checklist for qualitative research, while one article met seven items and another met five items. The studies that met with the criteria of the checklist for qualitative research are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
Generally, four different scales were used to measure household food insecurity during quantitative research, namely the United States Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) [86], the Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument [87], the Malaysian Coping Strategy Instrument (MCSI) [88], and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) [89]. Among them, the Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument was the most widely used instrument as it was used in 21 of the total publications. It was followed by the HFSSM in 12 publications. Meanwhile, the MCSI appeared in three publications. Other instruments included the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) and the Food Security Tool for Elderly, which were used in two and one publications, respectively.

3.1. The Prevalence of Food Insecurity

Five main Malaysian subpopulations, namely Indigenous People, adolescents/adults/low-income households/welfare-recipient households, university students, elderly population, and migrant workers were identified. The Orang Asli (Indigenous People) had rates of food insecurity from 81.2 to 88.0% [90,91,92,93]. Adolescents/adults/low-income households/welfare-recipient households experienced a prevalence of food insecurity ranging from 47.2% to 100.0% [54,88,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. Food insecurity in university students ranged from 22.0 to 70.0% [104,105,106,107,108,109,110]. The prevalence of household food insecurity among older people ranged from 6.9% to 27.7% [108,111,112,113,114], as shown in Table 3. Lastly, one study on migrant workers reported that 5.6% of migrants were food insecure [115].
For Orang Asli, the prevalence rates that were measured using Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instruments were between 81.2% and 88.0%. The prevalence of adolescents/adults/low-income households/welfare recipients was in the range of 50.6%–100.0% measured using the Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instruments, 68.1%-–73.8% using the MCSI, and 47.2%–64.3% using the HFIAS. The prevalence of food insecurity among university students was between 43.5% and 69.4% when measured using the HFSSM and 22.0% when using the Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instruments. Lastly, the prevalence of elderly food insecurity was 10.4% and 22.9% measured by the HFSSM, 6.9% by the Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instruments, 27.7% by the Food Security Tool for Elderly, and 5.6% by the HFIAS.

3.2. Contributing Factors to Food Insecurity

Most studies (30/32 articles) reported on socioeconomic factors contributing to household food insecurity (Table 4). Factors included poverty, low food expenditure, low education, and depletion of assets. University students experienced financial hardship due to inadequacy of student loans/scholarships. Limited income, increased expenditure on tuition fees and cost of living were primary contributing factors for university students. The structure of the household was a key contributing factor to food insecurity (19/32), including female-headed households, larger household, more children at school age, living in a rural residential area, and disabled household member(s). In addition, Siti Farhana et al. [108] reported that mental health was a contributing factor to food insecurity among the elderly. Law et al. [117] found that constraints in practicing traditional lifestyles among Orang Asli was associated with food insecurity. These constraints included failure in agriculture, ineffectiveness in traditional food-seeking activities, weather, and water issues.

3.3. Coping Strategies

Coping strategies were divided into two main categories, namely food-related and non-food-related coping strategies. Food-related coping strategies included reducing the amounts of food consumed, borrowing money to buy food, borrowing food, and skipping meals [93,117]. Non-food-related coping strategies related to improving participants’ socioeconomic backgrounds by undertaking odd jobs, borrowing money from relatives, and delaying payment of bills [93,117,118,131,133], as shown in the Table 4.

3.4. Consequences of Food Insecurity

The consequences of food insecurity across the four high-risk populations were explored by 21 articles. Children experienced unhealthy body weight status (low weight for age and low height for age) and inadequate dietary intakes (low diet quality and insufficient intake of nutrients) [117]. Women experienced inadequate dietary intakes such as low intake of energy, vitamins, fat and sodium, as well as low diet quality, and low intake of certain food groups (meat, fish, poultry, and legumes) [88], or high fat and sodium [90]. Household food insecurity contributed to poor health through higher body mass index (BMI), overweight and obesity, abdominal obesity, elevation in plasma glucose, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and metabolic syndrome, and low quality of life, as shown in Table 4.
Food insecurity in university students triggered anxiety and poor physical health through lack of energy, skipping classes, as well as higher BMI and triglyceride levels [130]. In elderly people, household food insecurity was linked to unhealthy body status (lower height) and inadequate dietary intake (low fat) [111], or higher intake of fat, oil, sugar, and salt [112].

4. Discussion

In this case, research on food insecurity at the household/individual level in Malaysia started late with the first article published in 2001 [119]. Since then, food insecurity issues have continued to gain attention at a rapid pace, as shown in this review. This review provides critical holistic information about food insecurity in high-risk populations in Malaysia, including prevalence, contributing factors, coping strategies, and consequences of household food insecurity. Most of the articles published reported on small-scale research projects focusing on high-risk households, particularly low-income households at the provincial level. During the early period covered by this review, limited attention from researchers was given to household food insecurity as Malaysia was experiencing rapid economic development, particularly in the 1980s and 1990s [134]. In 2014, the Malaysian Adult Nutrition Survey, a nationally representative study, included food insecurity indicators (skipping breakfast and relying on cheap food due to financial constraints) in the study [135]. The use of only two items does not provide a comprehensive picture of food security in the Malaysian population. Improvement is a necessity.
This review identified two groups experiencing high levels of food insecurity, Orang Asli women and low-income households/welfare-recipient households. The 10th Malaysian Plan (2011–2015) recognized Orang Asli as a disadvantaged group, with limited access to cchild education, water supply, electricity, and health care services [136]. Approximately 31.2% of the Orang Asli population (0.7% of Malaysia population) were living below PLI in 2010 and approximately 20.0% experienced extreme poverty [137]. Poor and extremely poor households, single parents, and family members with disabilities are eligible to receive financial and food assistance from government agencies. According to the high prevalence of household food insecurity among Orang Asli and low-income households/welfare-recipient households, it can be concluded that food aid and financial aid provided to the needy households brought only a short-term relief but did not solve the root problem (poverty). Therefore, there is a high probability that welfare recipients remained poor and were unable to achieve self-sustainability, becoming dependent on the aid received. Examples of studies that involved low-income households in other countries are Loopstra and Tarasuk in Canada [138], Weigel, Armijos, Racines, Cevallos, and Castro in Ecuador [139], and and Miller [140] in the U.S. Further, studies on Indigenous Peoples were conducted by Jasmin, Martin, Yanling, and Piort [141] in Canada, Willows, Veugelers, Raine, and Kuhle [142] in Canada, and Temple and Russell [143] in Australia.Certain characteristics of these groups have been recognized as resulting in higher vulnerability and less resilience toward household food insecurity and extra attention is required in order to address these issues.
The range of findings on the prevelance household food insecurity can be explained by differences in the instruments used to assess food insecurity. These include the United State Department of Agriculture HFSSM, the Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument, and the HFIAS. These tools were developed in high-income countries and were not adapted to the Malaysian culture, thus further validity and reliability studies are required to ensure that these tools are able to capture the true levels of food insecurity in Malaysia [144].
University students were found to be at high risk of food insecurity but the reported prevelance varied from 43.5% [130] to 67.7% [128,129]. The variations in the prevalence of food insecurity in these studies may be due to different study locations and numbers of respondents. The study by Nur Atiqah et al. [130] was conducted involving 124 undergraduate students at one public university located at Klang Valley, while the studies reported by Norhasmah et al. [128] and Siti Marhana et al. [129] involved 484 undergraduate students at four public universities in Peninsular Malaysia. Other countries have also reported variations in the prevalence of food insecurity among university students, ranging from 35.3% to 48.0% [145,146,147].
Lastly, elderly people are another group for concern in terms of increased household food insecurity although evidence from Malaysia is still limited, with only four articles published since 2017. Further research in this population is essential in Malaysia as the population is ageing rapidly, with 15% of the population expected to be aged over 65 years by 2030 [148]. Evidence from the US found that 13.6% of seniors were marginally food insecure, 7.7% were food insecure, and 2.9% were very low food secure [149]. Other studies conducted in various countries such as Australia [150], Turkey [151] and Brazil [41] have reported that the prevalence of food insecurity among elderly ranges from 13.0% to 21.8%.
In this systematic review, low socioeconomic background was identified as a key contributing factor to household food insecurity in all high-risk groups. These findings were consistent with studies from other countries among Indigenous Peoples [152,153], low-income households/welfare-recipient households [138,154] and elderly people [155,156]. Households with a higher income showed high-quality diets as well as more resilience towards any shock that might impact accessing food [157]. Another common contributing factor to household food insecurity was household structure including a larger household, more children, and female-headed households. Household structure affected food utilization among household members. A large household indicated that household members had to share limited amounts of food [158].
A lack of evidence was found relating to health status as a contributing factor to food insecurity in Malaysia compared to food insecurity among elderly people in other countries. Fernandes et al. [155] reported greater odds of having a chronic disease, reduced regular medical visits, and ceasing medication use due to financial issues among food-insecure elderly people in Portugal. Similarly, elderly respondents in the United States with multiple chronic conditions (two or more conditions) had a higher risk of being food insecure compared to elderly respondents with 0 to one condition. Older adults managing chronic diseases have greater economic constraints that impact their ability to acquire sufficient money to buy food [159].
In Indigenous populations, the ability to access traditional food from their surroundings was a unique characteristic and challenges to practicing their traditional food-seeking activities were considered to contribute to a higher prevalence of food insecurity. As such, it was not only economic access but physical access to food that increased risk of food insecurity. Consistent factors relating to food insecurity such as reduced hunting of traditional foods, high cost of harvesting tools, loss of cultural hunting activities, lack of time due to employment, and worry over contamination of traditional foods were reported by Schuster et al. [63] among Indigenous Peoples in Canada.
Two types of coping strategies were identified to manage household food insecurity. Food-related coping strategies involved activities pertaining to short-term food acquisition activities for overcoming food shortage. Meanwhile, non-food-related coping strategies or long-term livelihood coping strategies included improving the financial status of households so that more resources were available to buy more food [160]. Other coping strategies included the acceptance of or resignation to the food shortage situation. Lastly, emotion-focused coping strategies were linked to stress without having a solution [161]. Examples of emotion-focused coping included aspirational (having faith that good fortune will prevail), resignation (isolation from receiving help), distraction (mind tricks), and anger/violence (frustration). Such behaviours were practiced consistently by food-insecure household globally, for example as reported by in Kisi et al. [162] from Ethiopia, Ghimire [163] from Nepal, Rukundo, Oshaug, Andreassen, and Kikafunda [164] from Uganda, and Mabuza, Ortmann, and Wale [165] from Swaziland.
In Malaysia, household food insecurity has been found to compromise dietary intakes of respondents in terms of diet quality, intakes of certain food groups, and intakes of macro- and micronutrients among low-income households, university students, and elderly people in Korea, Ghana and India [17,166,167,168]. Reduced diet quality among food-insecure respondents was due to the high cost of quality food and financial constraints that inhibited them from making better food choices. As such, their choice of food shifted to low-quality food that were cheaper and highly accessible [44].
In addition to the negative influences of dietary constraints, psychological issues resulting from food insecurity were only reported amongst university students [133]. However, in other countries, there are reports of a relationship between food insecurity and psychological problems such as increased risk of developing mental disorders within households that included children [169,170]. The vulnerability of children towards developing persistent depression/anxiety and hyperactivity/inattention could be explained through the association of household food insecurity with poverty, marital discord, single parenthood, violence, parental substance abuse, and psychopathy, which influence child development and mental health [171].
Household food insecurity in Malaysia was found to be closely related to poor nutritional status, either underweight or overweight among women, children, university students, and elderly people. Relationships between adult underweight and household food insecurity have also been reported elsewhere, whereby adults compromise their own diet as a coping strategy to ensure healthy growth among children [19,34]. Overseas countries have also reported that household food insecurity was associated with overweight and obesity [36,172]. Overweight and obesity in food insecurity may result from greater consumption of high energy dense foods which are more accessible and cheaper to buy [173].

4.1. Limitations of This Study

There are several limitations to this systematic review. Generally, the limitations relate to the following aspects: article selection, characteristics of the articles, methodology, and generalization. Regarding article selection, this systematic review involved only peer-reviewed journal articles, without considering other forms of knowledge that might exist in reports, proceedings, booklets, or even posters. However, the latter documents are mainly unpublished and difficult to track. In addition, although four procedures were used to search for relevant journal articles, only two scientific databases were searched, which may have reduced access to some relevant articles and this is a key limitation. The two electronic databases were selected as the university subscribed to these two databases, providing access to full text of the articles. Limitations also relate to the methodology of the studies included in this review. The majority of the articles used a cross-sectional study design in quantitative research and a case study design in qualitative research. As such, it is not possible to determine cause and effect inferences of risk factors and consequences of household food insecurity. Nonetheless, more aspects of food security can be explored by applying new methods, particularly environmental factors under contributing factors. For example, the geographical information system (GIS) can be used to identify high-risk locations within a district. Multidimensional and comprehensive approaches provide an overview of food security, but current studies mostly focus on access and utilization aspects, also known as household and individual food security. A more holistic view can be observed by applying the Food Insecurity Multidimensional Index, which can capture the four dimensions of food security, namely availability, access, utilization, and stability. Notably, the use of different food insecurity measurement tools does not allow for accurate comparison across studies. Another limitation is that the instruments used in most of the studies were not well validated for use in the Malaysian context as they were developed in other countries. Generalization of the reviewed articles is also a limitation of this review. The sample size of all the studies were small and generalization of the findings to large population is not possible. Additionally, the target population focused only on high-risk groups such as low-income households, university students, Indigenous Peoples, and elderly. Future work could consider a national survey in order to gain a deeper general understanding towards food security in Malaysia and could include several groups such as Indigenous groups at Sabah and Sarawak as well as refugees. Despite these limitations, the results of this study are still useful for health practitioners, nutritionists, non-governmental organizations, and policy makers in planning strategies to reduce the burdens of household food insecurity among high-risk groups.

4.2. Recommendation

The studies provide clear evidence of household food insecurity among certain high-risk groups in Malaysia. The government must enforce the National Nutrition Policy of Malaysia 2005 as an effort to eradicate household food insecurity. Firstly, under the policy, a systematic surveillance system to monitor the progression of household food insecurity in Malaysia on a regular basis (for a specific period of five years) could be established. In addition, more target groups, such as individuals with HIV [174], people living with disabilities [175], immigrants [176], and refugees [43], should be considered in surveillance systems, as from the previous studies from foreign countries, they are considered as high-risk groups and require more attention compared to general population. Moreover, it is recommended that a stronger study design such as cohort study design be used in order to determine the cause and effect of household food insecurity. Secondly, through improved understanding of household food insecurity in Malaysia, strategies and interventions can also be implemented to address household food insecurity among high-risk groups. Interventions and planning should include improvements in household income, access to education, and employability. Lastly, through this systematic review, more research activities pertaining to household food insecurity should be encouraged in order to improve understanding of the undesired issues. Through this systematic review, several limitations are detected. The research gaps should be addressed by the researchers while planning for future research.

5. Conclusions

Having enough food to eat is a basic human right yet household food insecurity exists globally. Malaysia is moving forward with several research activities aimed to improve understanding of the problems. Through analysis on the studies, objectives of this systematic review were achieved, with information obtained on the prevalence of household food insecurity, risk factors for household food insecurity, coping strategies during household food insecurity, and consequences of household food insecurity. Risk factors, coping strategies, and consequences are important indicators that can be used to determine high-risk groups and even levels of food security status. The findings revealed that food security in Malaysia seems to be similar to that in other countries. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that the core of the problem might be different from country to country. Whatever solution is working in other countries might not be effective in Malaysia. Therefore, this systematic review helps in understanding household food insecurity in a Malaysian context. With the available information, context-specific intervention programmes can be implemented to tackle household food insecurity among vulnerable groups in Malaysia. The information is important to act as a reminder that the stream of rapid economic expansion may not be beneficial to every single community in the nation. There are always certain vulnerable groups that cannot follow the pace and fall behind. In this matter, a policy that aims to help these vulnerable groups in terms of improving their socioeconomic background can be recommended and thus securing food supply and intake. This can be achieved through the unity of Malaysians by establishing a conducive and harmonious environment that encourages learning and helps to improve employment rates and increase the mean monthly household income.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/3/945/s1, Table S1: Studies that met the criteria of the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Table S2: Studies that met the criteria of the checklist for qualitative research.

Author Contributions

N.S., H.Y., J.R. and L.S.L. planned and design this study. N.S. and L.S.L. carried out the literature search, interpreted the information, and wrote the manuscript. H.Y and J.R. contributed to conceptualisation of the idea that began during NS sabbatical at UoW and preparation of the manuscript. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all the authors involved. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hoddinott, J. Operationalizing Household Food Security in Development Projects: An Introduction. Technical Guide #1; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Smith, M.; Pointing, J.; Maxwell, S. Household Food Security: Concepts and Definitions: An Annotated Bibliography; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2001; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2002; Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/y1500e/y1500e00.htm (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Food Security Information for Action. Practical Guides. European Commission, FAO Food Security Program; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2008; Available online: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eufao-fsi4dm/doc-training/wkshp_rep_cambodia_1006.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  5. Andersen, S.A. Core indicators of nutritional state for difficult-to-sample populations. J. Nutr. 1990, 120, 1555–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Reports; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/ (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization; International Fund for Agricultural Development; United Nations Children’s Fund; World Food Programme; World Health Organization. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; Available online: http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA9692EN (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  8. Coleman-Jensen, A.; Gregory, C.; Rabbitt, M. Household Food Security in the United STATES in 2016; Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=84972 (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  9. Tarasuk, V.; Mitchell, A.; Dachner, N. Household Food Insecurity in Canada, 2012; Research to Identify Policy Option to Reduce Food Insecurity (PROOF): Toronto, ON, Canada, 2014; Available online: https://proof.utoronto.ca/resources/proof-annual-reports/annual-report-2012/ (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  10. Dhokarh, R.; Himmelgreen, D.A.; Peng, Y.K.; Segura-Pérez, S.; Hromi-Fiedler, A.; Pérez-Escamilla, R. Food insecurity is associated with acculturation and social networks in Puerto Rican households. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2011, 43, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Costa, N.S.; Santos, M.O.; Carvalho, C.P.O.; Assunção, M.L.; Ferreira, H.S. Prevalence and factors associated with food insecurity in the context of the economic crisis in Brazil. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2017, 1, e000869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. De Cock, N.; D’Haese, M.; Vink, N.; Rooyen, C.J.V.; Staelens, L.; Schönfeldt, H.C.; D’Haese, L. Food security in rural areas of Limpopo province, South Africa. Food Secur. 2013, 5, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tomayko, E.J.; Mosso, K.L.; Cronin, K.A.; Carmichael, L.; Kim, K.M.; Parker, T.; Yaroch, A.L.; Adams, A.K. Household food insecurity and dietary patterns in rural and urban American Indian families with young children. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adepoju, A.; Oyegoke, O. Correlates of food insecurity status of urban households in Ibadan Metropolis, Oyo state, Nigeria. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 2248–2254. [Google Scholar]
  15. Almeida, J.A.; Silva Santos, A.; Oliveira Nascimento, M.A.; Costa Oliveira, J.V.; Silva, D.G.; Mendes-Netto, R.S. Factors associated with food insecurity risk and nutrition in rural settlements of families. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 2017, 22, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Araújo, M.L.; Mendonça, R.D.; Lopes Filho, J.D.; Lopes, A.C.S. Association between food insecurity and food intake. Nutrition 2018, 54, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandrasekhar, S.; Aguayo, V.M.; Krishna, V.; Nair, R. Household food insecurity and children’s dietary diversity and nutrition in India. Evidence from the comprehensive nutrition survey in Maharashtra. Matern. Child Nutr. 2017, 13, e12447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Gebremedhin, S.; Baye, K.; Bekele, T.; Tharaney, M.; Asrat, Y.; Abebe, Y.; Reta, N. Predictors of dietary diversity in children ages 6 to 23 mo in largely food-insecure area of South Wollo, Ethiopia. Nutrition 2017, 33, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Isanaka, S.; Mora-Plazas, M.; Lopez-Arana, S.; Baylin, A.; Villamor, E. Food insecurity is highly prevalent and predicts underweight but not overweight in adults and school children from Bogotá, Colombia. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2747–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kaiser, L.L.; Melgar-Quiñonez, H.R.; Lamp, C.L.; Johns, M.C.; Sutherlin, J.M.; Harwood, J.O. Food security and nutritional outcomes of preschool-age Mexican-American children. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2002, 102, 924–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kropf, M.L.; Holben, D.H.; Holcomb, J.P.; Anderson, H. Food security status and produce intake and behaviors of special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children and Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program participants. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2007, 107, 1903–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oh, S.Y.; Hong, M.J. Food insecurity is associated with dietary intake and body size of Korean children from low-income families in urban areas. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 1598–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rosas, L.G.; Harley, K.; Fernald, L.C.H.; Guendelman, S.; Mejia, F.; Neufeld, L.M.; Eskenazi, B. Dietary associations of household food insecurity among children of Mexican descent: Results of a binational study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 2001–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mello, J.A.; Gans, K.M.; Risica, P.M.; Kirtania, U.; Strolla, L.O.; Fournier, L. How is food insecurity associated with dietary behaviors? An analysis with low income, ethnically diverse participants in a nutrition intervention study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 1906–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Leung, C.W.; Epel, E.S.; Ritchie, L.D.; Crawford, P.B.; Laraia, B.A. Food insecurity is inversely associated with diet quality of lower-income adults. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 114, 1943–1953.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Park, G.A.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Yang, Y.J. Health and nutritional status of Korean adults according to age and household food security: Using the data from 2010~2012 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Nutr. Health 2017, 50, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hackett, M.; Melgar-Quiñonez, H.; Álvarez, M.C. Household food insecurity associated with stunting and underweight among preschool children in Antioquia, Colombia. Rev. Panam. de Salud Pública 2009, 25, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hernandez, D.C.; Reesor, L.; Alonso, Y.; Eagleton, S.G.; Hughes, S.O. Household food insecurity status and Hispanic immigrant children’s body mass index and adiposity. J. Appl. Res. Child. 2015, 6, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  29. Metallinos-Katsaras, E.; Must, A.; Gorman, K. A longitudinal study of food insecurity on obesity in preschool children. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 112, 1949–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Speirs, K.E.; Fiese, B.H. The relationship between food insecurity and BMI for preschool children. Matern. Child Health J. 2016, 20, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Casey, P.; Szeto, K.; Robbins, J.; Stuff, J.; Connell, C.; Gossett, J.; Simpson, P. Child health-related quality of life and household food security. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2005, 159, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Schmeer, K.K.; Piperata, B.A. Household food insecurity and child health. Matern. Child Nutr. 2017, 13, e12301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Connell, C.L.; Lofton, K.L.; Yadrick, K.; Rehner, T.A. Children’s experiences of food insecurity can assist in understanding its effect on their well-being. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1683–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Singh, A.; Singh, A.; Ram, F. Household food insecurity and nutritional status of children and women in Nepal. Food Nutr. Bull. 2014, 35, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen Cheung, H.; Shen, A.; Oo, S.; Tilahun, H.; Cohen, M.J.; Berkowitz, S.A. Food insecurity and body mass index: A longitudinal mixed methods study, Chelsea, Massachusetts, 2009–2013. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2015, 12, E125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ryan-Ibarra, S.; Sanchez-Vaznaugh, E.V.; Leung, C.; Induni, M. The relationship between food insecurity and overweight/obesity differs by birthplace and length of US residence. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fischer, N.C.; Shamah-Levy, T.; Mundo-Rosas, V.; Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, I.; Pérez-Escamilla, R. Household food insecurity is associated with anemia in adult Mexican women of reproductive age. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 2066–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Seligman, H.K.; Laraia, B.A.; Kushel, M.B. Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bronte-Tinkew, J.; Zaslow, M.; Capps, R.; Horowitz, A.; McNamara, M. Food insecurity works through depression, parenting, and infant feeding, to influence overweight and health in toddlers. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2160–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Alam, M.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Flora, M.S.; Karim, M.R.; Iqbal Sharif, M.P.; Alam, M.A. Household food security and nutritional status of rural elderly. Bangladesh Med. J. 2011, 40, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. De Souza, N.J.; Marin-Leon, L. Food insecurity among the elderly: Cross-sectional study with soup kitchen users. Rev. de Nutr. 2013, 26, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dharod, J.M.; Croom, J.E.; Sady, C.G. Food insecurity: Its relationship to dietary intake and body weight among Somali refugee women in the United States. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2013, 45, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Maharaj, V.; Tomita, A.; Thela, L.; Mhlongo, M.; Burns, J.K. Food insecurity and risk of depression among refugees and immigrants in South Africa. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2017, 19, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huet, C.; Rosol, R.; Egeland, G.M. The prevalence of food insecurity is high and the diet quality poor in Inuit communities. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hughes, R.; Serebryanikova, I.; Donaldson, K.; Leveritt, M. Student food insecurity: The skeleton in the university closet. Nutr. Diet. 2011, 68, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Van Woerden, I.; Hrushka, D.; Bruening, M. Food insecurity negatively impacts academic performance. J. Public Aff. 2019, 19, e1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Berkowitz, S.A.; Seligman, H.K.; Meigs, J.B.; Basu, S. Food insecurity, healthcare utilization, and high cost: A longitudinal cohort study. Am. J. Manag. Care 2018, 24, 399–404. [Google Scholar]
  48. Campbell, C.C. Food insecurity: A nutritional outcome or a predictor variable? J. Nutr. 1991, 121, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hannum, E.C.; Liu, J.; Frongillo, E.A. Poverty, food insecurity and nutritional deprivation in rural China: Implications for children’s literacy achievement. Inter. J. Educ. Dev. 2014, 34, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Weigel, M.M.; Armijos, R.X.; Racines, M.; Cevallos, W. Food insecurity is associated with undernutrition but not overnutrition in Ecuadorian women from low-income urban neighbourhoods. J. Environ. Public Health 2016, 2016, 8149459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Tarasuk, V. Assessing the relevance of neighbourhood characteristics to the household food security of low-income Toronto families. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Habyarimana, J.B. Determinants of household food insecurity in developing countries evidences from a Probit Model for the case of rural households in Rwanda. Sustain. Agric. Res. 2015, 4, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ghattas, H.; Sassine, A.B.J.; Seyfert, K.; Nord, M.; Sahyoun, N.R. Prevalence and correlates of food insecurity among Palestinian refugees in Lebanon: Data from a household survey. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e01300724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ihab, A.N.; Rohana, A.J.; Wan Manan, M.W.; Suriati, W.N.W.; Zalilah, M.S.; Rusli, A.M. Association between household food insecurity and nutritional outcomes among children in Northeastern of Peninsular Malaysia. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2012, 8, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Mabli, J. SNAP Participation, Food Security, and Geographical Access to Food; Food and Nutrition Service, Department of Agriculture: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2014. Available online: http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/SNAPFS_FoodAccess.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  56. Dwi, W.S.; Sjarkowi, F.; Laila, H. Determinant of household food security status in relation with farming system in south Sumatra (The case of rural community nearby an industrial forest company). Int. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Sci. 2013, 1, 454–457. [Google Scholar]
  57. Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) Technical Working Group. Integrated Food Security Phase Classification; IPC Technical Working Group: Johannesburg, South Sudan, 2014; Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan/south-sudan-integrated-food-security-phase-classification-snapshot-january-july-0 (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  58. Kirimi, L.; Gitau, R.; Olunga, M. Household food security and commercialization among smallholder farmers in Kenya. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (AAAE), Hammamet, Tunisia, 22–25 September 2013; Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae13/161445.html (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  59. Maharjan, K.L.; Khatri-Chhetri, A. Household food security in rural areas of Nepal: Relationship between socio-economic characteristics and food security status. In Proceedings of the International Agricultural Economic Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 12–18 August 2006; Available online: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/25624 (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  60. Belmain, S. Assessment of the Impact of Rodents on Rural Household Food Security and the Development of Ecologically-Based Rodent Management Strategies in Zambézia Province, Mozambique. Project # R7372, ZB0146; Final Technical Report; Department of International Development: London, UK, 2002. Available online: http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/cropprotection/r7372_ftr.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  61. Zakari, S.; Ying, L.; Song, B. Factors influencing household food security in West Africa: The case of southern Niger. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1191–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Correal, C.; Zuluaga, G.; Madrigal, L.; Caicedo, S.; Plotkin, M. Ingano traditional food and health: Phase 1, 2004–2005. In Indigenous People’s Food Systems: The Many Dimensions of Culture, Diversity, and Environment for Nutrition and Health; Kuhnlein, H.V., Erasmus, B., Spigelski, D., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009; pp. 83–108. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i0370e/i0370e06.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  63. Schuster, R.C.; Wein, E.E.; Dickson, C.; Chan, H.M. Importance of traditional foods for the food security of two First Nations communities in the Yukon, Canada. Inter. J. Circumpolar Health 2011, 70, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. Available online: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  65. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Food: A Fundamental Human Rights. 2001. Available online: http://www.fao.org/FOCUS/E/rightfood/right2.htm (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  66. World Bank. The World Bank in Malaysia: Overview. 2018. Available online: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/malaysia/overview (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  67. Syahirah, S.J. Malaysia’s Absolute Poverty Rate at 5.6%—Chief Statistician. The Edge Market. 2020. Available online: https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/malaysias-poverty-rate-rises-56-%E2%80%94-chief-statistician (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  68. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Report of Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey 2016. 2017. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=120&bul_id=RUZ5REwveU1ra1hGL21JWVlPRmU2Zz09&menu_id=amVoWU54UTl0a21NWmdhMjFMMWcyZz09 (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  69. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Population Distribution and Basic Demographic Characteristics Report 2010. 2011. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/ctheme&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09&bul_id=MDMxdHZjWTk1SjFzTzNkRXYzcVZjdz09 (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  70. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA). Indigenous Peoples in Malaysia. Available online: https://www.iwgia.org/en/malaysia.html (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  71. Economic Planning Unit (EPU). Household Income, Poverty, and Household Expenditure. 2021. Available online: http://www.epu.gov.my/en/socio-economic-statistics/household-income-poverty-and-household-expenditure (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  72. National Coordinating Committee on Food and Nutrition (NCCFN). National Plan of Action for Nutrition of Malaysia (1996–2000); Ministry of Health: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 1995.
  73. National Coordinating Committee on Food and Nutrition (NCCFN). National Action of Action for Nutrition of Malaysia II (2006–2015); Ministry of Health: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2006.
  74. National Coordinating Committee on Food and Nutrition (NCCFN). National Action of Action for Nutrition of Malaysia III (2006–2015); Ministry of Health: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2016.
  75. Khoo, S.L.; Mohamad Shaharudin, S.; Parthiban, S.G.; Nor Malina, M.; Zhari, H. Urban poverty alleviation strategies from multidimensional and multi-ethnic perspectives: Evidence from Malaysia. Kaji. Malays. 2018, 36, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rabius, I.; Ahmad Bashawir, A.G.; Emil, M.; Narmatha, M. Determinants of factors that affecting in Malaysia. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 2017, 7, 355–364. [Google Scholar]
  77. Muzalwana, A.T.; Noor Khaleeda, A.M.; Sharifah Muhairah, S.; Adzmel, M. Household income and life satisfaction of single mothers in Malaysia. Int. J. Stud. Child. Women Elder. Disabl. 2020, 9, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  78. Aidil Fitri, S.; Charmaine Lim, J.M.; Mohamad Izzuan, M.I. The struggle of Orang Asli in Education: Quality of education. Malays. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2020, 5, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wan Manan, W.M.; Jomo, K.S.; Tan, Z.G. Addressing Malnutrition in Malaysia; Khazanah Research Institute: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  80. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Marques, E.A.; Reichenheim, M.E.; de Moraes, C.L.; Antunes, M.M.L.; Salles-Costa, R. Household food insecurity: A systematic review of the measuring instruments used in epidemiological studies. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 18, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Van Tulder, M.; Furlan, A.; Bombardier, C.; Bouter, L.; The Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003, 28, 1290–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Tool. 2018. Available online: https://joannabriggs.org/critical-appraisal-tools (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  84. Munn, Z.; Moola, S.; Lisy, K.; Riitano, D.; Tufanaru, C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and incidence data. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015, 13, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lockwood, C.; Munn, Z.; Porritt, K. Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015, 13, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Economic Research Service. U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Three-Stage Design, with Screeners; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8271/hh2012.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  87. Radimer, K.L.; Olson, C.M.; Greene, J.C.; Campbell, C.C.; Habicht, J.P. Understanding hunger and developing indicators to assess it in women and children. J. Nutr. Educ. 1992, 24, 36S–44S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Rohana, A.J.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Mirnalini, K.; Asnarulkhadi, A.S. Validation of the Malaysian Coping Strategies Instrument to measure household food insecurity in Kelantan, Malaysia. Food Nutr. Bull. 2011, 32, 354–364. [Google Scholar]
  89. Coates, J.; Swindale, A.; Bilinsky, P. Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for Measurement of Food Access: Indicator Guide; Food and Nutrition Technical Assistant Project (FANTA): Washington, DC, USA, 2007; Available online: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eufao-fsi4dm/doc-training/hfias.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  90. Chong, S.P.; Geeta, A.; Norhasmah, S. Household food insecurity, diet quality, and weight status among indigenous women (Mah Meri) in Peninsular Malaysia. Nutr. Res. Prac. 2018, 12, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chong, S.P.; Geeta, A.; Norhasmah, S. Predictorsof diet quality as measured by Malaysian Healthy Eating Index among aboriginal women (Mah Meri) in Malaysia. Nutrients 2019, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Nurfahilin, T.; Norhasmah, S. Factors and coping strategies related to food insecurity and nutritional status among Orang Asli women in Malaysia. IJPHCS 2015, 2, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  93. Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Asnarulkhadi, A.S. A qualitative study on coping strategies among women from food insecurity households in Selangor and Negeri Sembilan. Malays. J. Nutr. 2010, 16, 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ihab, A.N.; Rohana, A.J.; Wan Manan, M.W.; Suriati, W.N.W.; Zalilah, M.S.; Rusli, A.M. Association of household food insecurity and adverse health outcomes among mothers in low-income households: A cross sectional study of a rural sample in Malaysia. Inter. J. Collab. Res. Intern. Med. Public Health 2012, 4, 1971–1987. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ihab, A.N.; Rohana, A.J.; Wan Manan, M.W.; Suriati, W.N.W.; Zalilah, M.S.; Rusli, A.M. Nutritional outcomes related to household food insecurity among mothers in Rural Malaysia. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2013, 31, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Mohamad Hasnan, A.; Rusidah, S.; Ruhaya, S.; Nur Liana, A.M.; Ahmad Ali, Z.; Wan Azdie, M.A.B.; Tahir, A. Food insecurity situation in Malaysia: Findings from Malaysian Adult Nutrition Survey (MANS) 2014. Malays. J. Public Health Med. 2020, 20, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nor Syaza Sofiah, A.; Norhamah, S. Demographic and socio-economic characteristics, household food security status and academic performance among primary school children in North Kinta, Perak, Malaysia. Mal. J. Med. Health Sci. 2020, 16, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  98. Noratikah, M.; Norhasmah, S.; Siti Farhana, M. Socio-demographic factors, food security and mental health status among mothers in Mentakab, Pahang, Malaysia. Mal. J. Med. Health Sci. 2019, 15, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Rohana, A.J. Prevalence, demographic and socio-economic determinants and dietary consequences of food insecurity in Kelantan. Malays. J. Consum. Fam. Econ. 2012, 15, 85–102. [Google Scholar]
  100. Zalilah, M.S.; Khor, G.L. Indicators and nutritional outcomes of household food insecurity among a sample of rural Malaysian Women. Pak. J. Nutr. 2004, 3, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zalilah, M.S.; Khor, G.L. Obesity and household food insecurity: Evidence from a sample of rural households in Malaysia. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 59, 1049–1058. [Google Scholar]
  102. Zalilah, M.S.; Khor, G.L. Household food insecurity and coping strategies in a poor rural community in Malaysia. Nutr. Res. Prac. 2008, 2, 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ihab, A.N.; Rohana, A.J.; Manan, W.W.; Suriati, W.W.; Zalilah, M.S.; Rusli, A.M. Food expenditure and diet diversity score are predictors of household food insecurity among low income households in rural district of Kelantan Malaysia. Pak. J. Nutr. 2012, 11, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Izwan Syafiq, R.; Asma, A.; Nurzalinda, Z.; Rahijan, A.W.; Siti Nur Afifah, J. Food insecurity among university students at two selected public universities in Malaysia. Malays. Appl. Biol. 2019, 48, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  105. Khairil, A.; Noralanshah, H.; Farah Syafeera, I.; Nazrul, H.I.; Muhammad Ghazali, M. Pilot test on the prevalence of food insecurity among sub-urban university students during holy Ramadan. Pak. J. Nutr. 2015, 14, 457–460. [Google Scholar]
  106. Nurulhudha, M.J.; Norhasmah, S.; Siti Nur’Asyura, A.; Shamsul Azahari, Z.B. Financial problems associated with food insecurity among public university students in Peninsular Malaysia. Mal. J. Nutr. 2020, 26, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Roslee, R.; Lee, H.S.; Nurul Izzati, A.H.; Siti Masitah, E. Food insecurity, quality of life, and diet optimization of low income university students in Selangor, Malaysia. J. Gizi Pangan. 2019, 14, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Siti Farhana, M.; Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Zuriati, I. Prevalence of food insecurity and associated factors among free-living older persons in Selangor, Malaysia. Malays. J. Nutr. 2018, 24, 349–357. [Google Scholar]
  109. Nik Aida Adibah, N.A.Z.; Norhasmah, S. Tiada jaminan kedapatan makanan isi rumah di Kampung Pulau Serai, Dungun, Terengganu. Malays. J. Consum. 2013, 20, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  110. Yong, P.P.; Norhasmah, S. Food insecurity among Chinese households in Projek Perumahan Rakyat Air Panas, Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IJPHCS 2016, 3, 2289–7577. [Google Scholar]
  111. Nurzetty Sofia, Z.; Muhammad Hazrin, H.; Nur Hidayah, A.; Wong, Y.H.; Han, W.C.; Suzana, S.; Munirah, I.; Devinder Kaur, A.S. Association between Nutritional Status, Food Insecurity and Frailty among Elderly with Low Income. MJHS 2017, 15, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  112. Rohida, S.H.; Suzana, S.; Norhayati, I.; Hanis Mastura, Y. Influence of socio-economic and psychosocial factors on food insecurity and nutritional status of older adults in FELDA settlement in Malaysia. J. Clin. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2017, 8, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  113. Ruhaya, S.; Cheong, S.M.; Mohamad Hasnan, A.; Lalitha, P.; Norlinda, Z.; Siti Adibah, A.H.; Azli, B.S.; Norhasmah, S.; Norsyamlina, C.A.R.; Siti Shahida, A.A.; et al. Factor contributing to food insecurity among older persons in Malaysia: Findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2018. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2020, 20, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Siti Farhana, M.; Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Zuriati, I. Does food insecurity contribute towards depression? A cross-sectional study among the urban elderly in Malaysia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chan, F.M.; Faller, E.M.; Lau, X.C.; Gabriel, J.S. Household income, food security and nutritional status of migrant workers in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Ann. Glob. Health 2020, 86, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zalilah, M.S.; Tham, B.L. Food security and child nutritional status among Orang Asli (Temuan) households in Hulu Langat, Selangor. Med. J. Malays. 2002, 57, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  117. Law, L.S.; Norhasmah, S.; Gan, W.Y.; Mohd Nasir, M.T. Qualitative study on identification of common coping strategies practised by Indigenous Peoples (Orang Asli) in Peninsular Malaysia during periods of food insecurity. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 2819–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Law, L.S.; Norhasmah, S.; Gan, W.Y.; Siti Nur’Asyura, A.; Mohd Nasir, M.T. The Identification of the Factors Related to Household Food Insecurity among Indigenous People (Orang Asli) in Peninsular Malaysia under Traditional Food Systems. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Zalilah, M.S.; Ang, M. Assessment of food insecurity among low income households in Kuala Lumpur using the Radimer/Cornell Food Insecurity Instrument—A validation study. Malays. J. Nutr. 2001, 7, 15–32. [Google Scholar]
  120. Mohamadpour, M.; Sharif, Z.M.; Keysami, M.A. Food insecurity, health and nutritional status among sample of palm-plantation households in Malaysia. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2012, 30, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zalilah, M.S.; Norhasmah, S.; Rohana, A.J.; Wong, C.Y.; Yong, H.Y.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Mirnalini, K.; Khor, G.L. Food insecurity and the metabolic syndrome among women from low income communities in Malaysia. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 23, 138–147. [Google Scholar]
  122. Alam, M.D.; Siwar, C.; Wahid, A.N.M.; Abdul Talib, B. Food security and low-income households in the Malaysian East Coast Economic Region: An empirical analysis. Rev. Urb. Reg. Dev. Stud. 2015, 28, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Kandiah, M.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Asnarulkhadi, A.S. Household food insecurity among urban welfare recipient households in Hulu Langat, Selangor. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. 2012, 20, 405–420. [Google Scholar]
  124. Siti Marhana, A.B.; Norhasmah, S. Perbelanjaan dan tiada jaminan kedapatan makanan isi rumah dalam kalangan penerima bantuan pusat urus zakat Pulau Pinang, Bukit Mertajam. Malays. J. Consum. 2012, 19, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  125. Cooper, E.E. Evaluating household food insecurity: Applications and insights from rural Malaysia. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2013, 52, 294–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Roselawati, M.Y.; Wan Azdie, M.A.B.; Aflah, A.; Jamalludin, R.; Zalilah, M.S. Food security status and childhood obesity in Kuantan Pahang. Int. J. Allied Health 2017, 1, 56–71. [Google Scholar]
  127. Susanti, A.; Norhasmah, S.; Fadilah, M.N.; Siti Farhana, M. Demographic factors, food security, health-related quality of life and body weight status of adolescents in rural area in Mentakab, Pahang, Malaysia. Mal. J. Nutr. 2019, 25, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Norhasmah, S.; Zuroni, M.J.; Marhana, A.B. Food insecurity among public university students receiving financial assistance in Peninsular Malaysia. Malays. J. Consum. Fam. Econ. 2013, 16, 78–91. [Google Scholar]
  129. Siti Marhana, A.B.; Norhasmah, S.; Hsuniyah, A.R. Perbelanjaan dan tiada jaminan kedapatan makanan dalam kalangan mahasiswa yang menerima bantuan kewangan di institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam. Malays. J. Consum. 2014, 22, 78–90. [Google Scholar]
  130. Nur Atiqah, A.; Norazmir, M.N.; Khairil Anuar, M.I.; Mohd Fahmi, M.; Norazlanshah, H. Food security status: It’s association with inflammatory marker and lipid profile among young adults. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar]
  131. Wan Azdie, M.A.B.; Shahidah, I.; Suriati, S.; Rozlin, A.R. Prevalence and factors affecting food insecurity among university students in Pahang, Malaysia. Mal. J. Nutr. 2019, 25, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  132. Fadilah, M.N.; Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Zuriati, I. Socio-economic status and food insecurity among the elderly in Panji District, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. Malays. J. Consum. Fam. Econ. 2017, 20, 53–66. [Google Scholar]
  133. Law, L.S.; Roselan, B.; Norhasmah, S. Understanding Food Insecurity among Public University Students. Malays. J. Youth Stud. 2015, 12, 49–75. [Google Scholar]
  134. Aznam Yusuf, Z.; Bhattasali, D. Economic Growth and Development in Malaysia: Policy Making and Leadership; Working Paper no. 27; Commission on Growth and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; Available online: https://www.academia.edu/3175238/Economic_growth_and_development_in_Malaysia_policy_making_and_leadership (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  135. Rusidah, S.; Hasnan, A.; Chong, Z.L.; Ahmad Ali, Z.; Zalilah, M.S.; Wan Azdie, A.B. Household food insecurity in Malaysia: Findings from Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey. Med. J. Malays. 2015, 70, 11. [Google Scholar]
  136. Economic Planning Unit (EPU). Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011–2015; Prime Minister’s Department: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2010. Available online: https://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RMK10_Eds.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  137. Department of Orang Asli Development (JAKOA). Strategic Plan for the Orang Asli Development 2011–2015; JAKOA: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2011.
  138. Loopstra, R.; Tarasuk, V. Severity of household food insecurity is sensitive to change in household income and employment status among low-income families. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Weigel, M.; Armijos, R.X.; Racines, M.; Cevallos, W.; Castro, N.P. Association of household food insecurity with the mental and physical health of low-income urban Ecuadorian women with children. J. Environ. Public Health 2016, 2016, 5256084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Miller, D.P. Accessibility of summer meals and food insecurity of low-income households with children. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 2079–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Jasmin, B.; Martin, J.C.; Yanling, G.; Piort, W. The association of household food security, household characteristics and school environment with obesity status among off-reserve First Nations and Métis children and youth in Canada: Results from the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey. Health Promot. Chronic Dis. Prev. 2017, 37, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  142. Willows, N.; Veugelers, P.; Raine, K.; Kuhle, S. Associations between household food insecurity and health outcomes in the Aboriginal population (excluding reserves). Health Rep. 2011, 22, 15. Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2011002/article/11435-eng.htm (accessed on 6 December 2020). [PubMed]
  143. Temple, J.B.; Russell, J. Food insecurity among older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Int. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Kimberlin, C.L.; Winterstein, A.G. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments use in research. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2008, 65, 2276–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Micevski, D.A.; Thornton, L.E.; Brockington, S. Food insecurity among university students in Victoria: A pilot study. Nutr. Diet. 2013, 71, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Payne-Sturges, D.C.; Tjaden, A.; Caldeira, K.M.; Vincent, K.B.; Arria, A.M. Student hunger on campus: Food insecurity among college students and implications for academic institutions. Am. J. Health Promot. 2018, 32, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Entza, M.; Slaterb, J.; Desmaraisc, A.A. Student food insecurity at the University of Manitoba. Can. Food Stud. 2017, 4, 139–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Saharani, A.R.; Puzziawati, A.G.; Noorizam, D.; Zulkiifli, A.G.H.; Siti Noorul Ain, N.A.; Sharifah Norhuda, S.W.; Mohd Rizal, R. Malaysia’s aging population trends. In Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2014), Proceedings of the RCSTSS 2014, Cameron Highlands, Pahang, Malaysia, 23–25 November 2014; Springer: Singapore, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ziliak, J.P.; Gundersen, C. The State of Senior Hunger in America 2016: An Annual Report; Feeding America: Chicago, IL, USA, 2018; Available online: https://www.feedingamerica.org/sites/default/files/research/senior-hunger-research/state-of-senior-hunger-2016.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  150. Russell, J.; Flood, V.; Yeatman, H.; Mitchell, P. Prevalence and risk factors of food insecurity among a cohort of older Australians. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2014, 18, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Simsek, H.; Meseri, R.; Sahin, S.; Ucku, R. Prevalence of food insecurity and malnutrition, factors related to malnutrition in the elderly: A community-based cross-sectional study from Turkey. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2013, 4, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Tarasuk, V.; Fafard St-Germain, A.A.; Mitchell, A. Geographic and socio-demographic predictors of household food insecurity in Canada, 2011–2012. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Willows, N.D.; Veugelers, P.; Raine, K.; Kuhle, S. Prevalence and sociodemographic risk factors related to household food security in Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 12, 1150–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Neter, J.E.; Dijkstra, S.C.; Visser, M.; Brouwer, I.A. Food insecurity among Dutch food bank recipients: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2013, 4, e004657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Fernandes, S.G.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Nunes, C.; Santos, O.; Gregório, M.J.; de Sousa, R.D.; Dias, S.; Canhão, H. Food insecurity in older adults: Results from the epidemiology of chronic diseases cohort study 3. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Leroux, J.; Morrison, K.; Rosenberg, M. Prevalence and predictors of food insecurity among older people in Canada. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Decent Rural Employment for Food Security: A Case for Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i2750e/i2750e00.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  158. Olayemi, A.O. Effects of Family Size on Household Food Security in Osun State, Nigeria. Asian J. Agric. Dev. 2012, 2, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  159. Jih, J.; Stijacic-Cenzer, I.; Seligman, H.K.; Boscardin, W.J.; Nguyen, T.T.; Ritchie, C.S. Chronic disease burden predicts food insecurity among older adults. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 1737–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Duhaime, G.; Godmaire, A. The conditions of sustainable food security: An integrated conceptual framework. In Sustainable Food Security in the Arctic: State of Knowledge; Duhaime, G., Ed.; University of Alberta, CCI Press: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2002; p. 32. Available online: https://journalindigenouswellbeing.com/volume-1-2-winter-2003/the-conditions-of-sustainable-food-security-an-integrated-conceptual-framework/ (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  161. Chilton, M.; Rabinowich, J.; Breen, A.; Mouzon, S. When the system fails: Individual and household coping strategies related to child hunger. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Research Gaps and Opportunities on the Causes and Consequences of Child Hunger, Committee on National Statistics and Food and Nutrition Board, Washington, DC, USA, 8–9 April 2013; Available online: https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_084305.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  162. Kisi, M.A.; Tamiru, D.; Teshome, M.S.; Tamiru, M.; Feyissa, G.T. Household food insecurity and coping strategies among pensioners in Jimma Town, south west Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Ghimire, D.R. Household food security and coping strategies: Vulnerabilities and capabilities in rural communities. IJSRP 2014, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  164. Rukundo, P.M.; Oshaug, A.; Andreassen, B.A.; Kikafunda, J. Food variety consumption and household food insecurity coping strategies after the 2010 landslide disaster—The case of Uganda. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 3197–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Mabuza, M.L.; Ortmann, G.F.; Wale, E. Frequency and extent of employing food insecurity coping strategies among rural households: Determinants and implications for policy using evidence from Swaziland. Food Secur. 2016, 8, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kim, H.J.; Oh, K. Household food insecurity and dietary intake in Korea: Results from the 2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 3317–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Nakitto, M.; Asano, K.; Chi, I.; Yoon, J. Dietary intake of adolescents from food insecure households: Analysis of data from the 6th (2013–2015) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2017, 11, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Agbadi, P.; Urke, H.B.; Mittelmark, M.B. Household food insecurity and adequacy of child diet in the food insecure region north in Ghana. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Burke, M.P.; Martini, L.H.; Çayir, E.; Hartline-Grafton, H.L.; Meade, R.L. Severity of household food insecurity is positively associated with mental disorders among children and adolescents in the United States. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 2019–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Perkins, J.M.; Nyakato, V.N.; Kakuhikire, B.; Tsai, A.C. Food insecurity, social networks and symptoms of depression among men and women in rural Uganda: A cross-sectional, population-based study. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Melchior, M.; Caspi, A.; Howard, L.M.; Ambler, A.P.; Bolton, H.; Mountain, N.; Moffitt, T.E. Mental health context of food insecurity: A representative cohort of families with young children. Pediatrics 2009, 124, e564–e572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Martin-Fernandez, J.; Caillavet, F.; Lhuissier, A.; Chauvin, P. Food insecurity, a determinant of obesity? An analysis from a population-based survey in the Paris Metropolitan area, 2010. Obes. Facts 2014, 7, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Keino, S.; Plasqui, G.; van den Borne, B. Household food insecurity access: A predictor of overweight and underweight among Kenyan women. Agric. Food Secur. 2014, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Pienaar, M.; van Rooyen, F.C.; Walsh, C.M. Household food insecurity and HIV status in rural and urban communities in the Free State province, South Africa. SAHARA J. 2017, 14, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Heflin, C.M.; Altman, C.E.; Rodriguez, L.L. Food insecurity and disabilities in the United States. Disabil. Health J. 2019, 12, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Chilton, M.; Black, M.M.; Berkowitz, C.; Casey, P.H.; Cook, J.; Cutts, D.; Jacobs, R.R.; Heeren, T.; de Cuba, S.E.; Coleman, S.; et al. Food insecurity and risk of poor health among US-born children of immigrants. Am. J. Public Health 2009, 99, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Article Selection Processes.
Figure 1. Article Selection Processes.
Nutrients 13 00945 g001
Table 1. Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies in JBI Critical Appraisal Tool [84].
Table 1. Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies in JBI Critical Appraisal Tool [84].
No.Checklist
1Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?
2Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5Were confounding factors identified?
6Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?
8Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Table 2. Checklist for qualitative research in JBI Critical Appraisal Tool [85].
Table 2. Checklist for qualitative research in JBI Critical Appraisal Tool [85].
No.Checklist
1Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Table 3. Prevalence of and groups at risk of food insecurity in Malaysia.
Table 3. Prevalence of and groups at risk of food insecurity in Malaysia.
No.AuthorsYearStudy DesignRespondents
(Target Groups)
Study LocationInstrumentPrevalenceQuality Assessment
Orang Asli (Indigenous Peoples)
1.Zalilah, M.S. and Tham, B.L. [116]2002Cross-sectional studyn = 64
Women
Orang Asli (Indigenous Peoples) (information on household food insecurity) and child (weight and height)
Hulu Langat District of Selangor, StateRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument81.2% food insecurity (20.3% household food insecurity
32.8% individual food insecurity
28.1% child hunger)
2/8
2.Nurfahilin, T. and Norhasmah, S. [92]2015Cross-sectional studyn = 92
Women
Orang Asli
Gombak District of Selangor,
State
Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument88% food insecurity (48.9% household food insecurity
21.7% individuals food insecurity
17.4% child hunger)
4/8
3.Chong, S.P., Geeta, A. and Norhasmah, S. [90]2018Cross-sectional studyn = 222
Orang Asli (Indigenous) Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Non-vegetarian
No chronic diseases
No changes in
food habits in past six months
Kuala Langat District of Selangor, StateRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument82.9% food insecurity (29.3% household food insecurity,
23.4% individual food insecurity,
30.2% child hunger)
7/8
4.Chong, S.P., Geeta, A. and Norhasmah, S.
[91]
2019Cross-sectional studyn = 222
Orang Asli (Indigenous) Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Non-vegetarian
No chronic diseases
No changes in food habits in past six months to reduce weight
Kuala Langat District of Selangor, StateRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument82.9% food insecurity (29.3% household food insecurity,
23.4% individual food insecurity,
30.2% child hunger)
8/8
5.Law, L.S., Norhasmah, S., Gan, W.Y. and Mohd Nasir, M.T.
[117]
2018aCase study
(qualitative study)
In-depth interviews 61 women (Senoi, Proto-Malay and Negrito) FGD
19 women proto Malay
Perak, Selangor, and Pahang, Malaysia--8/10
6.Law, L.S., Norhasmah, S., Gan, W.Y., Siti’Asyura, A., and Mohd Nasir, M.T.
[118]
2018bCase study
(qualitative study)
n = 61
Orang Asli women
Food aid-recipient household
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Perak, Selangor, and Pahang, Malaysia--8/10
Low-income households/welfare-recipient households
7.Zalilah, M.S. and Ang, M. [119]2001Cross-sectional studyn = 137
Women (information on household food insecurity) and child (weight and height)
Kuala LumpurRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument65.7% food insecurity (27.7% household food insecurity
10.9% individual food insecurity
27.0% child hunger)
5/8
8.Zalilah, M.S. and Khor, G.L. [100]2004Cross-sectional studyn = 200
Women of poor households in a rural community in Malaysia
Sabak Bernam District of Selangor stateRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument58.0% food insecurity (14% household food insecurity
9.5% individual food insecurity
34.5% child hunger)
7/8
9.Zalilah, M.S. and Khor, G.L. [101]2005Cross-sectional studyn = 200
Women of poor households in a rural community in Malaysia
Sabak Bernam District of Selangor StateRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument58.0% food insecurity (14.0% household food insecurity
9.5% individual food insecurity
34.5% child hunger)
6/8
10.Zalilah, M.S. and Khor, G.L. [102]2008Cross-sectional studyn = 200
Women of poor households in a rural community in Malaysia
Sabak Bernam District of Selangor StateRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument58.0% food insecurity (14.0% household food insecurity
9.5% individual food insecurity
34.5% child hunger)
7/8
11.Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., Mirnalini, K., Mohd Nasir, M.T and
Asnarulkhadi, A.S. [88]
2011Cross-sectional studyn = 301
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating, living in rural and urban areas
Tumpat and Kota Bharu Districts of Kelantan, StateMalaysian Coping Strategy Instrument (MCSI)68.1% food insecurity (33.9% moderately food insecurity,
34.2% severely food insecurity)
6/8
12.Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S. and Rohana, A.J [99]2012aCross-sectional studyn = 301
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating, living in rural and urban areas
Tumpat and Kota Bharu Districts of Kelantan, StateMalaysian Coping Strategy Instrument (MCSI)68.1% food insecurity (33.9% moderately food insecurity,
34.2% severely food insecurity)
6/8
13.Mohamadpour, M., Zalilah M.S., Keysami M.A. [120]2012Cross-sectional studyn = 169
Palm plantation women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Nilai, Negeri Sembilan StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument
85.2% food insecurity (24.9% household food insecurity,
19.5% individual food insecurity
40.8% child hunger)
6/8
14.Nik Aida Adibah, N.A.A. and
Norhasmah S. [109]
2013Cross-sectional studyn = 80
Women
Kampung Pulau Serai, Dungun District of Terengganu, StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
93.75% food insecurity (51.25% household food insecurity
23.75% individuals food insecurity
18.75% child hunger)
3/8
15.Zalilah, M.S., Norhasmah, S., Rohana, A.J., Wong, C.Y, Yong, H.Y., Mohd Nasir, M.T., Mirnalini, K., and Khor, G.L. [121]2014Cross-sectional studyn = 625
Women
Low-income communities
3 states of Peninsular Malaysia (Selangor,
Negeri Sembilan and Kelantan)
Radimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument
78.4% food insecurity (26.7% household food insecurity
25.3% individual food insecurity
26.4% child hunger)
7/8
16.Alam, M.D., Siwar, C., Wahid, A.N.M. and Abdul Talib, B. [122]2016Cross-sectional studyn = 460
Households from urban and rural areas East Coast Economic Region (ECER)
(e-kasih database)
Kelantan, Terengganu Pahang StatesUnited States Agency for International Development Household Food Insecurity Access47.2% food insecurity (23.3% mildly food insecurity
14.3% moderately food insecurity
9.6% are severely food insecurity)
1/8
17.Yong, P.P. and Norhasmah, S. [110]2016Cross-sectional studyn = 109
Chinese women aged between 30 and 55 years old
Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) Kuala LumpurRadimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument50.6% food insecurity (18.5% household insecurity
14.8% individual insecurity
17.3% child hunger)
1/8
18.Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., Mirnalini, K., Mohd Nasir, M.T. and
Asnarulkhadi, A.S. [123]
2012bCross-sectional studyn = 103
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Hulu Langat District of Selangor, StateMalaysian Coping Strategy
Instrument (MCSI)
73.8% food insecurity (39.8% moderate food insecurity,
34.0% severely food security)
4/8
19.Siti Marhana, A.B. and Norhasmah, S. [124]2012Cross-sectional Studyn = 80
Women and men
Zakat recipients
Bukit Martajam, Pulau Pinang, StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument
100.0% food insecurity (5.0% household food insecurity,
30.0% individual food insecurity
65.0% child hunger)
3/8
20.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [54]
2012aCross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Bachok District of Kelantan, StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
83.9% food insecurity (29.6% household food insecurity
19.3% individuals food insecurity
35.0% child hunger)
6/8
21.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [103]
2012bCross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Bachok District of Kelantan, StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
(PJN)
83.9% food insecurity (29.6% household food insecurity
19.3% individuals food insecurity
35.0% child hunger)
6/8
22.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [94]
2012cCross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Bachok District of Kelantan StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
83.9% food insecurity (29.6% household food insecurity
19.3% individuals food insecurity
35.0% child hunger)
7/8
23.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [95]
2013Cross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Bachok District of, Kelantan StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument
83.9% food insecurity (29.6% household food insecurity
19.3% individuals food insecurity
35.0% child hunger)
7/8
24.Cooper, E.E. [125]2013Cross-sectional studyn = 70
Households
Children (n = 104) aged between 6 months and 6 years old
Malay fishing villages
Sematan subdistrict
of Lundu at the southwest coast of Sarawak
Household Food Insecurity Access
Scale (HFIAS)
64.3% food insecurity (10.0% mildly food insecurity
25.7% moderately food insecurity
28.6% severely food security)
2/8
25.Roselawati, M.Y., Wan Azdie, M.A.B., Aflah, A., Jamalludin, R., and Zalilah, M.S. [126]2017Cross-sectional studyn = 128
Malay women with their children
Age 21 to 59 years olds
Kuantan District of Pahang StateRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
77.0% food insecurity
(52.0% house old food insecurity,
9.0% individual food insecurity
16.0% child hunger)
7/8
26.Mohamad Hasnan, A., Rusidah, S., Ruhaya, S., Nur Liana, A.M., Ahmad Ali, Z., Wan Azdie, A.B., and Tahir, A. [96]2020Cross-sectional studyn = 2962
Adults
National representative sample in MalaysiaSix items adapted from USDA instruments
(United States Department of Agriculture)
Quantity insufficiency: 25.0%
Variety insufficiency: 25.5%
Reduced size of meal: 21.9%
Skipped meal: 15.2%
Rely on cheap food and affordable food: 23.7%
Could not afford to feed their children with various food: 20.8%
4/8
27.Nor Syaza Sofiah, A.; Norhasmah, S. [97]2020Cross-sectional studyn = 140
Adults
Two national primary schoolsRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
80.7% food insecurity (26.4% household food insecurity,
27.9% individual food insecurity,
26.4% child hunger)
4/8
28.Noratikah, Norhasmah and Siti Farhana [98]2019Cross-sectional studyn = 129
Mothers aged 20 to 59 years
Low household incomeRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
55.8% food insecurity (7.0% household food insecurity,
30.2% individual food insecurity,
18.6% child hunger)
7/8
29.Susanti, A., Norhasmah, S., Fadilah, M.N., and Siti Farhana, M. [127]2019Cross-sectional studyn = 160
Households that comprised pairs of mothers and children aged 13–17 years
Mentakab, Temerloh district, PahangRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
48.8% food insecurity (20.0% household food insecurity,
13.8% individual food insecurity,
15.0% child hunger)
8/8
30.Norhasmah, S.; Zalilah, M.S.; Mohd Nasir, M.T.; Asnarulkhadi, A.S. [93]2010Case study
(qualitative study)
n = 57
20–50-year-old women
Selangor and Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia--7/10
University students
31.Norhasmah, S., Zuroni, M.J. and Siti Marhana, A.B. [128]2013Cross-sectional studyn = 484
Undergraduate Public University students
Peninsular MalaysiaUSDA instruments
(United States Department of Agriculture)
67.1% food insecurity
(44.4% low food insecurity,
22.7% very low food insecurity)
1/8
32.Siti Marhana, A.B.,
Norhasmah, S. and Husniyah, A.R [129]
2014Cross-sectional study484 Public
Undergraduate Public University students
Peninsular MalaysiaUSDA instruments
(United States Department of Agriculture)
67.1% food insecurity (44.4% low food insecurity,
22.7% very low food insecurity)
2/8
33.Nur Atiqah, A., Norazmir, M.N, Khairil Anuar, M.I., Mohd Fahmi, M. and Norazlanshah, H. [130]2015Cross-sectional studyn = 124
University students
Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Puncak Alam Selangor, StateAdults Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM)43.5% food insecurity5/8
34.Izwan Syafiq, R.; Asma, A.; Nurzalinda, Z.; Rahijan, A.W.; Siti Nur Afifah, J. [104]2019Cross-sectional studyn = 96
University students
Two selected public universities in TerengganuRadimer/Cornell
Hunger and Food Insecurity instrument
22% food insecurity (14% low food security,
8% very low food security)
1/8
35.Khairil, A.; Noralanshah, H.; Farah Syafeera, I.; Nazrul, H.I.; Muhammad Ghazali, M. [105]2015Cross-sectional studyn = 30
University students
Kolej Jasmine, UiTM Puncak Perdana, Shah Alam, MalaysiaAdults Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM)70% food insecurity (37% low food security, 30% very low food security)3/8
36.Nurulhudha, Norhasmah, Siti Nur’ Asyura, and Shamsul Azahari [106]2020Cross-sectional study427
Undergraduate Public University students
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Universiti Malaysia Pahang and Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaAdults Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM)60.9% food insecurity (39.3% low food security,
21.6% very low food security)
7/8
37.Roslee, R.; Lee, H.S.; Nurul Izzati, A.H.; Siti Masitah, E. [107]2019Cross-sectional studyn = 108
Low-income university students
Selangor, MalaysiaUSDA Household Food Security Survey Module 2012
(Six Item Short Form)
69.4% food insecurity (50.5% low food security,
29.3% very low food security)
2/8
38.Wan Azdie, M.A.B., Shahidah, I., Suriati, S., and Rozlin, A.R. [131]2019Cross-sectional studyn = 307
Students from six faculties of the International Islamic University Malaysia
Kuantan, PahangAdults Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM)54.4% food insecurity (32.9% low food security,
21.5% very low food security)
3/8
39.Law, L.S., Roselan, B. and Norhasmah, S. [117]2015In-depth interview
(qualitative research)
4 informants
University students
Selangor, Malaysia--5/10
Elderly population
40.Fadilah, M.N., Norhasmah, S., Zalilah M.S. and Zuriati I. [132]2017Cross-sectional studyn = 227
Elderly aged 60 and over
Mukim Panji, Kota Bharu District of Kelantan StateUSDA Household Food Security Survey Module 2012
(Six Item Short Form)
22.9% food insecurity (15.4% low food security,
7.5% very low food security)
4/8
41.Nurzetty Sofia, Z., Muhammmad Hazrin, H., Nur Hidayah, A., Wong, Y.H., Han, W.C., Suzana, S., Munirah, I. and Devinder Kaur, A.S. [111]2017Cross-sectional studyn = 72
Elderly aged 60 years
Able to communicate total household income lower than or equal to RM3000 per month
Do not suffer from terminal illness, dementia and mental illness
Urban poor residential area in Klang Valley of Malaysia (i.e., Kampung Medan, Petaling Jaya)Radimer/Cornell Hunger and Food Insecurity Instrument6.9% food insecurity5/8
42.Rohida, S.H., Suzana, S., Norhayati, I. and Hanis Mastura, Y. [112]2017Cross-sectional studyn = 289
Older adults aged 60 years and over
Older adults from FELDA Land Development Authority (FELDA)—Northern Region of MalaysiaFood Security Tool For Elderly27.7% food insecurity
22.4% food insecurity for men
29.0% food insecurity for women
3/8
43.Siti Farhana, M., Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., and Zuriati, I. [114]2018Cross-sectional studyn = 220
Older adults aged 60 to 87 years
Two randomly subdistricts (Petaling II and Damansara) in Petaling districtSix-item Short Form of Food Security Status19.5% food insecurity
18.2% low food security
1.3% low food security
4/8
44.Ruhaya et al. [113]2020Cross-sectional studyn = 3977
Older adults ≥ 60 years old
National representative sample in MalaysiaUSDA Household Food Security Survey Module 2012 and USDA Household Food Security Survey Module 2012
(Six Item Short Form)
10.4% food insecurity7/8
45.Siti Farhana, M., Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., Zuriati, I. [114]2020Cross-sectional studyn = 220
Elderly people aged 60 years and over
Petaling district, Selangor, MalaysiaUSDA Household Food Security Survey Module 2012
(Six Item Short Form)
19.5% food insecurity6/8
Migrant worker
46.Chan, F.M., Faller, E.M., Lau, X.C., and Gabriel, J.S. [115]2020Cross-sectional studyn = 125
Documented migrant workers from five selected countries
Klang Valley, SelangorHousehold Food Insecurity Access
Scale (HFIAS)
57.6% food insecurity (24.8% mildly,
29.6% moderately,
3.2% severely)
4/8
Table 4. Contributing factors, consequences, and coping strategies of food insecurity in Malaysia (40 articles).
Table 4. Contributing factors, consequences, and coping strategies of food insecurity in Malaysia (40 articles).
No.AuthorsStudy DesignRespondents
(Target Groups)
Risk Factors for Food Insecurity Health and Nutritional Outcomes of Food InsecurityCategories of Coping StrategiesCoping Strategies
(Top Five for Each Coping Strategy Group)
Orang Asli
1.Zalilah, M.S. and Tham, B.L. [116]
(2002)
Cross-sectional studyn = 64
Women
Orang Asli (Indigenous Peoples)
Low income
Low per-capita income
Among children
Low weight-for-age and height-for-age children
Poor diet quality
Low intakes of calories and several nutrients (calcium and niacin)
-NA--NA-
2.Nurfahilin, T. and Norhasmah, S. [92]
(2005)
Cross-sectional studyn = 92
Women
Orang Asli
Low education level
High number of children
Low monthly income
Large household
Among orang Asli women
Low intake of vitamin C
Food-related coping strategies
Consuming whatever food available around the house
Using less expensive food
Allocating money to buy staples and less preferred food
Using less preferred food
Cutting down the portion size or number dishes for meals
Non-food-related coping strategies
Being thrifty in using money
Selling or pawning of assets
Planning for expenditure
Buying less expensive products or shopping at cheaper places
Delaying the payment of bills
Catching or fishing fish from rivers
Depending on forest results
3.Chong, S.P., Geeta, A. and Norhasmah, S. [90]
(2008)
Cross-sectional studyn = 222
Orang Asli (Indigenous) Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Non-vegetarian
No chronic diseases
No changes in
food habits in past six months
Large household
Low household income
Low per-capita income
Low food expenditure
Among orang Asli women
Multivariate analysis of food-insecure group was significantly associated with a higher BMI after controlling for age
Child hunger had higher Malaysian HEI score for fat and sodium
-NA--NA-
4.Chong, S.P., Geeta, A. and Norhasmah, S. [91]
(2019)
Cross-sectional studyn = 222
Orang Asli (Indigenous) Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Non-vegetarian
No chronic diseases
No changes in food habits in past six months
-NA-Among orang Asli women
Food security status appeared to be a predictor for diet quality
-NA--NA-
5.Law, L.S, Norhasmah, S., Gan, W.Y. and Mohd Nasir, M.T. [117]
(2018a)
Case study
(qualitative study)
In-depth interviews 61 women (Senoi, Proto-Malay and Negrito) FGD 19 women proto Malay-NA--NA-Identified 21 coping strategies and divided into two themes
Food consumption (four themes)
Dietary changes (two subthemes)
Eating plain rice with soy sauce or salt
Eating less preferred food
Diversification of food sources (nine subthemes)
Finding food from surroundings
Taking water from a nearby river
Borrowing money to buy food
Buying food on credit
Buying cheaper food
Buying a small amount of food
Bringing children into the jungle to find food
Borrowing/requesting food
Borrowing motor to buy food
Decreasing the number of people (two subthemes)
Visiting friend or relative during meal
Sending children to relative’s or friend’s house
Food rationing (five subthemes)
More food for children
Reducing portion size
Skipping meals
Staying in hungry
Drinking fluid when hungry
Financial management (three themes)
Increasing household income (two subthemes)
Taking up odd work
Selling own poultry
Reducing expenses for schooling children (three subthemes)
Reducing children pocket money
Ceasing to provide pocket money to children
Having debt with school
Reducing expenses on daily necessities (two subthemes)
Delaying monthly electric bill payment
Seldom/never buying clothes
6.Law, L.S., Norhasmah, S., Gan, W.Y., Siti’Asyura, A., and Mohd Nasir, M.T. [118]
(2018b)
Case studyn = 61
Orang Asli women
Food aid-recipient household
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Failure in agriculture
Threat from wild animal
Lack of land supply
Ineffectiveness of traditional food-seeking activities
Exhausting, tiring, dangerous, and time-consuming journey for food-seeking activities
Depletion of natural commodities
Reduced demand of natural commodities
Lack of equipment
Weather
Rainy season
Dry season
Water issues
Continuity of water
Cleanliness of water
-NA--NA--NA-
Low-income households/welfare-recipient households/mothers
7.Zalilah, M.S. and Ang, M. [119]
(2001)
Cross-sectional studyn = 137
Women (information on household food insecurity) and child (weight and height)
Larger household
Lower education level of mothers
Lower education level of father and mother
-NA--NA--NA-
8.Zalilah, M.S. and Khor, G.L. [100]
(2004)
Cross-sectional studyn = 200
Women of poor households in a rural community in Malaysia
Lower years of education
Lower household income
Low per-capita income
More children
Mothers as housewives
Among women
Overweight
Abdominal obesity
At-risk waist circumference
-NA--NA-
9.Zalilah, M.S. and Khor, G.L. [101]
(2005)
Cross-sectional studyn = 200
Women of poor households in a rural community in Malaysia
Lower years of education
Lower household income
Low per-capita income
More children
Mothers as housewives
Among women
Overweight and obesity
(more time in domestic and leisure activities)
Overweight and abdominal adiposity
(associated with housewives, more children, larger household, food insecurity, shorter time spent in economic activities, longer time spent in leisure activities and lower food variety score)
Women from food-insecure households were significantly more likely to have at-risk WC, after controlling other factors
-NA--NA-
10.Zalilah, M.S. and Khor, G.L. [102]
(2008)
Cross-sectional studyn = 200
Women of poor households in a rural community in Malaysia
Living below the poverty line
No land/asset
Larger household
More children
More school-going children
Mothers as house wives
Food-related coping strategies
Reduce intake of foods taken outside home
Cook whatever food is available at home
Reduce amount of food cooked for meals
Borrow money to buy food
Reduce amount of food intake
Income/expenditure-related coping strategies
Reduce daily/monthly spending
Use savings
Borrow money
Sell valuable materials (jewellery, land, etc.)
Have a second job
11.Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., Mirnalini, K., Mohd Nasir, M.T and Asnarulkhadi, A.S. [88]
(2011)
Cross-sectional studyn = 301 Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating, living in rural and urban areas
Larger household
Larger number of children
Larger number of children attending school
Low household income
Lower per-capita income
Among women
Low energy intake
Low fat intake
Low percentage of energy from fat
Low number of servings of meat fish, or poultry and legumes
Low diet diversity (in rural area)
-NA--NA-
12.Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., and Rohana, A.J. [99]
(2012a)
Cross-sectional studyn = 301
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating, living in rural and urban areas
Larger household
Larger number of children
Larger number of children attending school
Low household income
Lower per-capita income
Among women
Low energy intake
Low fat intake
Low percentage of energy from fat
Low number of servings of meat, fish, poultry and legumes
Low diet diversity (in rural area)
-NA--NA-
13.Mohamadpour, M., Zalilah, M.S., and Keysami, M.A. [120]
(2012)
Cross-sectional studyn = 169
Palm plantation women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating
Low education
Larger number of children
Low household income
Low per-capita income
Among women
Low diet diversity
Low intake of vitamin C
Low serving size of protein group
Diet diversity score significant protective factor against health risks even after adjusting for other variables
-NA--NA-
14.Nik Aida Adibah, N.A.A. and
Norhasmah, S. [109]
(2013)
Cross-sectional studyn = 80
Women
Poverty
Low household income
Higher percentage of household income on food expenditure
-NA-Food-related coping strategies
Using less expensive food
Favoring certain household members over others
Cutting down the portion or size or the number of dishes for meals
Reducing the number of meals eaten in a day
Consuming whatever food available around the house
Non-food-related coping strategies
Being thrifty in using money
Planning for expenditures
Buying less expensive products or shopping at cheaper places
Buying new clothes for children but not for mothers
Buying less expensive clothes or buying clothes on credit
15.Zalilah, M.S., Norhasmah, S., Rohana, A.J., Wong, C.Y, Yong, H.Y., Mohd Nasir, M.T., Mirnalini, K., and Khor, G.L. [121]
(2014)
Cross-sectional studyn = 625
Women
Low-income communities
Indian women
Live in rural areas (palm plantations or villages)
Have only primary education
Low household income
Low per-capita income
Among women
Low diet diversity
After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic covariates, women with food insecurity had lower risk of:
Abdominal obesity
Elevated plasma glucose
Cholesterol
LDL cholesterol
Metabolic syndrome
Food-related coping strategies (four themes)
Food stretching (two subthemes)
Using less expensive food
Using less preferred food
Food rationing (five subthemes)
Consuming whatever food available around the house
Purchasing food on credit
Borrowing money from employer/friends/neighbors/siblings to buy food
Receiving food assistance from the agencies/neighbors/siblings/individuals/employer
Sending children to eat with mothers/siblings/neighbors houses
Food seeking (two subthemes)
Consuming whatever food available around the house
Purchasing food on credit
Food anxiety (one sutheme)
Allocating money to buy staples and less preferred food
Non-food-related coping strategies
(four themes)
Cloth purchasing behaviours (three suthemes)
Buying new clothes for children but not for mothers
Buying less expensive clothes or buying clothes on credit
Receiving clothes from individuals or agencies
Reduce school-going children’s expenditure (two subthemes)
Children not taking money to school
Decreasing children’s school pocket money
Delay the payment of bills (three suthemes)
Delaying the payment of bills
Delaying the payment of bills until they received warning letters or the supplies were terminated
Delaying the payment of rent
Adjust lifestyle (8 subthemes)
Being thrifty in using money
Plan for expenditure
Buying less expensive products or shopping at cheaper places
Not attending or giving gifts during parties or festivals
Requesting money from relatives or friends
Increase cash and income
Engaging in odd jobs
Selling or pawning assets (jewelry)
16.Cooper, E.E. [125]
(2013)
Cross-sectional studyn = 70
Households children (n = 104) aged between 6 months and 6 years old Malay fishing villages
-NA--NA-Food-related coping strategiesUnwanted food consumption (e.g., uncooked blocks of ramen, diluted rice porridge and scavenged cassava leaves) (e.g., ‘If we eat, we eat. If not, there is nothing to be done. You keep quiet’).
Women’s alternative income strategies
Collect jungle produce/wild foods
Cultivate a home garden
Make ocean-derived products for sale (e.g., dried, salted fish or handicrafts)
Prepare food items for sale (e.g., local cakes or satay)
With licensed food stall Collect recyclables
Sell items from home (e.g., grocery items, clothing, or cloth)
Catch crab or fish
Sew
17.Alam, M.D., Siwar, C., Wahid, A.N.M. and Abdul Talib, B. [122]
(2016)
Cross-sectional studyn = 460
Households from urban and rural areas East Coast Economic Region (ECER)
(e-kasih database)
Poverty status
Marginally non-poor group significantly differ in the level of household food security from other groups (hard-core poor, poor and recently marginally non-poor)
-NA--NA--NA-
18.Yong, P.P. and Norhasmah, S. [110]
(2016)
Cross-sectional studyn = 109
Chinese women aged between 30 and 55 years old
Younger age
Large household
Lower household income
Higher number of children
Higher number of schooling children
Higher number of disabled family members
Lower education level
Lower spouse education
Among women
Higher BMI
At risk abdominal obesity
Food-related coping strategies
Using less expensive food
Using less preferred food
Favouring certain household members over others
Consuming whatever food available around the house
Reducing the number of meals eaten in a day
Non-food-related coping strategies
Buying less expensive products or shopping at cheaper place
Being thrifty
Planning for expenditures
Delaying the payment of the bills
Delaying the payment of the rent
19.Roselawati, M.Y., Wan Azdie, M.A.B., Aflah, A., Jamalludin, R., and Zalilah, M.S. [126]
(2017)
Cross-sectional studyn = 128
Malay women with their children
Aged 21 to 59 years olds
Large household
Lower income
Low per-capita income
Living in urban area
Among children
The proportion of overweight/obesity among children from food secure households was lower (48.3%) than from food-insecure households were (60.6%)
However, no significant different between childhood overweight/obesity and food security status
-NA--NA-
20.Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S, Mirnalini, K., Mohd Nasir, M.T and
Asnarulkhadi, A.S. [123]
(2012b)
Cross-sectional studyn = 103
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Presence of children below 7 years old
More school-going children
Disabled member(s) in the households
Income reliance on financial assistance
Low per-capita income
-NA--NA--NA-
21.Siti Marhana, A.B. and Norhasmah, S. [124]
(2012)
Cross-sectional Studyn = 80
Women and men Zakat recipients
Poverty
Low food expenditure compared to average Malaysian food expenditure
-NA-Food-related coping strategies
Using less expensive food
Allocating money to buy staples and less preferred food
Cutting down the portion size or number of dishes in a meal
Reducing the number of meals eaten in a day
Using less preferred food
Non-food-related coping strategies
Being thrifty in using money
Planning for expenditure
Delaying the payment of bills
Decreasing pocket money given to school-going children
Delaying the payment of bills until the received warning letters or the supplies were terminated
22.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S. and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [103](2012b)
Cross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non- pregnant
Non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Less food group expenditure
Fruits
Animal-based food
Milk and dairy products
Decrease in food expenditure by one Malaysian Ringgit is associated with 1% increase in the odds ratio of food insecurity
-NA--NA--NA-
23.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [95] (2013)
Cross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Larger household size
Low total monthly income
Low per-capita income
Higher percentage of household income on food expenditure
Among women
No significant association between food insecurity with BMI, and waist-circumference
-NA--NA-
24.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and
Mohamed Rusli, A. [54]
(2012a)
Cross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating Welfare-recipient households
Low education of the mother
Larger household
Larger number of children
Larger number of children going to school
Low monthly household income
Low per-capita incomel
Lower number of household members contributing to income
Lower food expenditure
-NA--NA--NA-
25.Noratikah, Norhasmah and Siti Farhana [98]
(2019)
Cross-sectional studyn = 129
Mothers aged 20 to 59 years
Low household income
Among women
Depression
Anxiety
Stress
-NA--NA-
26.Mohamad Hasnah, A., Rusidah, S., Ruhaya, S., Nur Liana, A.M., Ahmad Ali, Z., Wan Azdie, A.B., and Tahir, A. [96]
(2020)
Cross-sectional studyn = 2962
Adults
Race
Education level
Household income
27.Susanti, A., Norhasmah, S., Fadilah, M.N., and Siti Farhana, M. [127]
(2019)
Cross-sectional studyn-160
Households that comprised pairs of mothers and children aged 13–17 years
Number of school-going siblings
Occupation status of mother
Occupation status of father
Household income
House ownership status
Among adolescents
Significant differences between food-secure and food-insecure adolescents in:
Health-related quality of life
BMI
-NA--NA-
28.Ihab, A.N., Rohana, A.J., Wan Manan, W.M., Wan Suriati, W.N., Zalilah, M.S., and Mohamed Rusli, A. [94]
(2012c)
Cross-sectional studyn = 223
Women
Non-pregnant and non-lactating welfare-recipient households
Among women
Food insecurity remains a significant independent predictor of responses for each SF-36 scale (Health-related quality of life) components
-NA--NA--NA-
University students
29.Norhasmah, S., Zuroni, M.J. and Siti Marhana, A.B. [128]
(2013)
Cross-sectional studyn = 484
Undergraduate Public University students
Inadequacy of student loan
Increase in the cost of living
Rise in tuition compulsory fees
-NA-Food-related coping strategies
Using less expensive food
Cutting the portion size or number of dishes for meals
Reducing the number of meals eaten in a day
Cooking alone in college/rented house
Sharing food with friends
Non-food-related coping strategies
Being thrifty in using money
Reducing personal expenditures
Planning for expenditure
Requesting money from relative/friends
Engaging with odd jobs
30.Law, L.S. Roselan, B. and Norhasmah, S. [117]
(2015)
Inidepth interview
(qualitative research)
4 informants University students
Sudden closure of cafeterias
Inadequacy of loan/scholarship
Lack of personal transportation
Low quality of food
Time constraints
Among university students
Anxiety
Lack of energy
Inability to focus during class
Falling ill
Food-related coping strategies
Storing food stuff
Reducing meal portions
Skipping meals
Requesting outside food from friends
Purchasing food outside campus
Forcing down dissatisfying cafeteria and mini mart meal due to hygiene issues
31.Siti Marhana, A.B.,
Norhasmah, S. and
Husniyah, A.R. [129]
(2014)
Cross-sectional study484 Public Undergraduate Public University students
Higher percentage of household income on food expenditure (37.2%).
-NA-Food coping strategies
Using less expensive food
Cutting the portion size or number of dishes for meals
Reducing the number of meals eaten in a day
Cooking alone in college/rented house
Sharing food with friends
Non-food-related coping strategies
Being thrifty in using money
Reducing personal expenditures
Planning for expenditure
Requesting money from relative/friends
Engaging with odd jobs
32.Nurulhudha, Norhasmah, Siti Nur’ Asyura, and Shamsul Azahari
[106]
(2020)
Cross-sectional study427 Undergraduate Public University students
Financial problem
-NA--NA--NA-
33.Wan Azdie, M.A.B., Shahidah, I., Suriati, S., and Rozlin, A.R. [131]
(2019)
Cross-sectional studyn = 307
Students from six faculties of the International Islamic
University Malaysia
Time constraints
Spending on books
Miscellaneous items
Parents’ income
Scholarship type
-NA--NA--NA-
34.Nur Atiqah, A., Norazmir, M.N, Khairil Anuar, M.I., Mohd Fahmi, M. and Norazlanshah, H. [130]
(2015)
Cross-sectional study124 university students
(18 to 25) years old
Among university students
High Fat Mass Index
High triglyceride levels among male in food insecure-group
s-NA--NA-
Elderly population
35.Fadilah, M.N, Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S. and Zuriati, I. [132]
(2017)
Cross-sectional studyn = 227
Elderly aged 60 and over
Low personal income
Larger household
Widow/widower marital status
Lower educational level
Older age
-NA--NA--NA-
36.Siti Farhana, M., Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., and Zuriati, I. [108]
(2018)
Cross-sectional studyn = 220
Older adults aged 60 to 87 years
Univariate analysis: Significant associations between food insecurity with:
Marital status
Education level
Occupation status
Monthly income
Oral health status
Binary logistics: Significant likelihood to develop household food insecurity:
Low monthly income
Poor oral health status
Living in rented accommodation
-NA--NA--NA-
37.Ruhaya et al. [113] (2020)Cross-sectional studyn = 3977
Older adults ≥ 60 years old
From rural areas
With primary and secondary education
Income less than RM 2000
At risk of malnutrition
Lack of social support
-NA--NA--NA-
38.Nurzetty Sofia Z, Muhammmad Hazrin H, Nur Hidayah A., Wong Y. H., Han W. C., Suzana S., Munirah I. and Devinder Kaur A. S. [111]
(2017)
Cross-sectional studyn = 72
Elderly aged 60 years
Able to communicate
Household income ≤ RM3000 per month
No terminal illness, dementia and mental illness
-NA-Among elderly population
Bivariate analysis
Significant correlation between food insecurity, low height of respondents and low fat intake
-NA--NA-
39.Rohida, S.H., Suzana, S., Norhayati, I. and Hanis Mastura, Y. [112]
(2017)
Cross-sectional studyn = 289
Older adults aged 60 years and over from FELDA Land Development Authority (FELDA)—Northern Region of Malaysia
-NA-Among elderly population
Significant higher intake of fat, oil, sugar, and salt among food-insecure elderly
-NA--NA-
40.Siti Farhana, M., Norhasmah, S., Zalilah, M.S., Zuriati, I. [114]
(2020)
Cross-sectional studyn = 220
Elderly people aged 60 years and over
-NA-Among elderly population
Significant correlation between food insecurity and depression
-NA--NA-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sulaiman, N.; Yeatman, H.; Russell, J.; Law, L.S. A Food Insecurity Systematic Review: Experience from Malaysia. Nutrients 2021, 13, 945. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030945

AMA Style

Sulaiman N, Yeatman H, Russell J, Law LS. A Food Insecurity Systematic Review: Experience from Malaysia. Nutrients. 2021; 13(3):945. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030945

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sulaiman, Norhasmah, Heather Yeatman, Joanna Russell, and Leh Shii Law. 2021. "A Food Insecurity Systematic Review: Experience from Malaysia" Nutrients 13, no. 3: 945. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030945

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop