Next Article in Journal
Efficacy Evaluation of Plant Products in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction Related to Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
Intermittent Fasting before Laparotomy: Effects on Glucose Control and Histopathologic Findings in Diabetic Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/nu13124518
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations between Feeding Patterns and Infant Health in China: A Propensity Score Matching Approach

by
Yuehui Fang
,
Yiyao Lian
,
Zhenyu Yang
,
Yifan Duan
and
Yuna He
*
Key Laboratory of Trace Element Nutrition of National Health and Family Planning Commission, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 29 Nanwei Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(12), 4518; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124518
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 15 December 2021 / Published: 17 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Breastmilk is the optimal food for infants. Feeding pattern is closely related to physical development and health during infancy. Understanding the associations between feeding patterns and health status can inform related policy interventions and advocacy in China. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between infant feeding patterns and health status in China infants. The China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance 2013 was a national-representative cross-sectional study performed particularly for children aged 0–5 years. A total of 3974 infants aged under 1 year were included in the analysis, of whom 1082 (27.2%) made up the formula feeding group, and 2892 (72.8%) made up the breastfeeding group. The associations between feeding patterns and physical development and health were investigated using propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression models. Among breastfeeding and formula feeding infants aged 9–11 months old, weight-for-age z score was 1.1 ± 1.1 and 0.9 ± 1.3, respectively, and weight-for-length z score was 1.0 ± 1.3 and 0.7 ± 1.4, respectively. Hemoglobin in 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, and 9–11 months old breastfeeding infants was 121.4 ± 15.2 g/L, 117.1 ± 13.0 g/L, 113. 9 ± 11.9 g/L, and 114.4 ± 14.0 g/L, while in 0–2, 3–5, 6–8, and 9–11 months formula feeding infants was 116.3 ± 14.8 g/L, 120.4 ± 11.3 g/L, 119.8 ± 11.2 g/L, and 120.0 ± 11.5 g/L, respectively. Breastfeeding was associated with lower risk of respiratory disease (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.99) and diarrhea (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.98). Breastfeeding could slightly improve infant physical development, and had a protective effect on the diarrheal and respiratory diseases. Infants aged 3–11 months who were breastfeeding showed lower hemoglobin than that of formula-fed infants and thus should increase intake of iron rich complementary foods.

1. Introduction

Early nutrition is critical for the development of children. Human milk is the optimal food for infants and is closely related to health during infancy. Early and prolonged breastfeeding has been proven to ensure the best possible health and developmental outcomes for the infant [1]. Exclusive breastfeeding for four to six months is generally considered one of the best protective measures to prevent allergy and associated illnesses [2]. According to previous studies, breastfeeding is protective against acute respiratory infection and diarrhea [3,4,5], and is considered to be one path to lower healthcare economic costs due to lower incidence of diseases in both breastfed infants and breastfeeding mothers [6]. Breast milk is rich in antimicrobial substances that are important in preventing early-life infections, including immunoglobulins, complement proteins, lysozyme, lactoferrins, and oligosaccharides [7,8]. Moreover, human milk consumption introduces the infant to highly diverse and complex bacterial communities [9]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and Chinese dietary guidelines both recommend that children be exclusively breastfed for six months, and continue to be breastfed until two years of age or beyond [10].
The majority of people’s lifestyles have changed dramatically in both rural and urban areas as a result of China’s process of urbanization. The feeding patterns of infants under the age of 12 months have changed greatly. Since the 1990s, China has made numerous efforts to encourage breastfeeding [11]. However, between 1985 and 2015, in China’s urban area, the formula feeding rate among infants under 6 months and the continuous breastfeeding rate at 1 year of age were remained stable at around 15% and 30%, respectively, while in the suburbs, the formula feeding rates increased from 6.5% to 15.2% and continuous breastfeeding rates decreased from 60.1% to 29.8% [12]. According to the most recent results of the Chinese nutrition and health survey in 2013, exclusive breastfeeding rate among infants aged 0–6 months was 18.6% [13].
Feeding pattern is one of the environmental determinants related to weight gain and subsequent obesity [14]. Breastfeeding has been regarded as associated with lower weight and length gain throughout infancy when compared with formula feeding [15]. Formula-fed infants, on the other hand, are believed to be more prone to acquire weight and develop out of proportion to linear growth [16]. Breastfeeding is also thought to play a role in preventing obesity in infants and non-communicable diseases in adults [17]. Nevertheless, some studies yielded contradictory results. A recent study reported that the amount of formula was unrelated to weight [18]. A systematic review showed that an inverse association between exclusive breastfeeding duration and weight and length gain during infancy was only found in the developed setting [19]. Another systematic review suggested that breastfeeding may protect against being overweight or obese, but residual confounding cannot be ruled out [20].
As far as we know, except for feeding practice, biomedical and behavioral factors could also influence physical and immune system development during infancy [21], including preterm delivery [22], low birth weight (LBW) and intrauterine growth restriction [23], infectious diseases [24], sleep duration [25,26], physical activities [27], and complementary food feeding [28,29]. Infant development may be influenced by sociodemographic and maternal factors such as maternal gestational weight gain [30], gestational age, employment and education, family income and regional economic level [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] could also affect infant development. These variables were also related to infants’ feeding patterns [32]. These confounding factors may have an impact on the results of infant feeding studies.
In light of the above, it is critical to account for confounding factors when assessing the relationship between feeding patterns and physical and heath health in infants, which necessitates the use of proper study methods. Knowing the association between feeding patterns and physical health in Chinese infants is essential to health practitioners and policymakers in China and will help to promote infant health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

Data for this study was obtained from the 2013 China National Nutrition and Health Survey (CNNHS). The China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance 2010–2013 was a national-representative cross-sectional study that covered 30 provinces. It was conducted by the National Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (NINH, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention). All of the participants in this study were selected during the surveillance round 2013, which targeted children aged 0 to 5 and lactating mothers. The surveillance used stratified proportional random cluster sampling methods to ensure it had national representatives. As described in previous study, a total of 2865 districts/counties in China were categorized into four strata (large cities, medium and small cities, general rural areas, and poor rural areas), from which 55 counties (12 metropolis, 15 medium and small cities, 18 general rural areas, and 10 poor rural areas) were chosen in the study. In each selected county, three communities/townships were systematically sampled. In each selected township, three neighborhood/villages were systematically selected. Finally, 10 children from each age group were randomly selected in each selected village [13]. All participants and their guardians were required to complete an informed consent form before participating in the study. The Ethics Review Board of the Institute for Nutrition and Health, China CDC approved the protocol (2013–018). Only infants and their mothers both with complete basic and diet information were included in the analysis. Separate analyses were carried out for infants aged 0–2 months, 3–5 months, 6–8 months, and 9–11 months (Figure 1).

2.2. Outcome Variables

The outcome variables were body length, body weight, weight-for-age z score, length-for-age z score, weight-for-length z score, hemoglobin, and prevalence of respiratory disease and diarrheal disease. Z-scores were calculated based on the WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight, and age [33]. Respiratory disease and diarrheal disease were measured based on maternal recall of symptoms of cough and shortness of breath, and diarrhea during the last two weeks, respectively. Blood samples were collected from infants’ finger using capillary blood extraction. Cyanide high-iron method was used to determine hemoglobin concentration.

2.3. Exposure Variables

We investigated infants’ intake of breast milk, formula, and complementary food during the previous week. Breastfeeding data were collected by recall interviews carried out face-to-face with the parents or caregivers of the infants. Feeding patterns were classified into two types for infants under 1 year of age based on their sources of milk.
  • Breastfeeding infants were those whose source of milk was only breast milk (inclusive of mother’s own milk by bottle);
  • Formula feeding were those whose source of milk was only formula.
Because the proportion of feedings containing breast milk is unknown, fixed feeding was not included in the analysis.

2.4. Potential Confounders

The potential confounders were selected based on the results of previously published studies [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] and the availability of data. Potential confounding factors were broadly classified into socioeconomic and demographic factors, biomedical and behavioral factors, and maternal factors.
Socioeconomic and demographic factors included place of usual residence, household wealth status, and mother’s education and occupation. Based on the socio-economic level of the survey sites, places of usual residence were classified as big cities, medium and small cities, normal rural, and poor rural. Annual household income per capita was classified into three categories: low (CNY 10,000), medium (CNY 10,000–19,999), and high (CNY 20,000) to describe household wealth status. Mother’s education was categorized into four categories: elementary school or below, junior school, high school, high school, and college and above. Mother’s occupation was categorized into three categories: professionals, working in the agricultural industry, and others.
Infant biomedical and behavioral factors included gestational age, birth weight, physical activity, sleep duration, and complementary food intake. Gestational age was divided into two groups: preterm infants were defined as gestational age < 37 weeks, term infants were defined as gestational age ≥ 37 weeks. Birth weight was divided into three groups. Low birth weight (LBW) was defined as birth weight < 2500 g, whereas macrosomia was defined as birth weight > 4000 g. According to Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep for children under 5 years of age [34], the continuous variable reflecting hours of sleep duration was dichotomized into sufficient (sleep duration ≥ 14 h/day for infant younger than 3 months, sleep duration ≥ 12 h/day for infant above 3 months) and insufficient (sleep duration < 14 h/day for infant younger than 3 months, sleep time < 12 h/day for infant above 3 months), and physical activity time was dichotomized into high (activity time ≥ 30 min/day) and low (activity time < 30 min/day). For infants over the age of 6 months, complementary food was matched to the types of complementary foods consumed in the previous week, which included grains, tubers, vegetables, fruits, legumes, eggs, meat, aquatic products, and dairy.
Maternal factors included maternal age and gestational weight gain. Maternal age was categorized into three categories: <20 years, 25–35 years, and >35 years. Gestational weight gain was categorized into insufficient, appropriate, and excessive according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) [35].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were entered through a standardized data management platform and were cleaned for all variables. Normally distributed data were assessed using the paired t-test, whereas for non-normally distributed data, a paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test was applied. A chi-square test was used for categorical variable comparison.
Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce potential selection bias with the potential confounders. Even though cross-sectional surveys are useful for examining the relationships between exposure and outcome variables, unlike randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized self-selection in the exposure could confound the measure of association between the exposures and the outcomes [36]. Rosenbum and Rubin [37] proposed the PSM method to minimize the imbalance in participant characteristics between exposed and unexposed groups by considering the confounding between the two groups. PSM is a method for balancing the propensity scores of the exposed and unexposed groups so that covariate comparisons between the two groups can be made directly.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the associations between feeding patterns and respiratory and diarrheal diseases. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported as the measure of association between feeding patterns and diseases. Data clean and analysis were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Propensity scoring and matching were conducted using the MatchIt package (version 4.1.0) for R software (R for Windows 4.0.5).

3. Results

The general characteristics before and after matching were described in Table 1. A total of 3974 infants were included in the analysis, of whom 1082 (27.2%) made up the formula feeding group, 2892 (72.8%) made up the breastfeeding group. Of the total infants, 2226 (56.0%) were from urban areas and 1748 (44.0%) were from rural areas, 2014 were boys (50.7%) and 1960 were girls (49.3%). Breastfeeding infants made up nearly three times the number of formula-fed infants. Between two feeding groups, there were differences in living area, annual income per capita, whether the infant was born to term or not, birth weight, physical activity time, complementary food intake, and mother’s educational level and occupation. After propensity score matching, no significant differences were found between two groups for the matched covariates.
In all age groups, there was little difference in infant body length between the breastfeeding and formula feeding groups. The difference of body weight between the two groups was minimal among infants under 6 months of age. However, among infants aged 6 to 11 months, body weight, weight-for-age z score and weight-for-length z score were significantly higher in breastfeeding group than those in formula feeding group. With the exception of the 0–2 months group, hemoglobin in the breastfeeding group was significantly lower compared with the formula feeding group (Table 2, Figure 2).
The prevalence of respiratory and diarrheal diseases during the last two weeks in breastfeeding group was lower than that in the formula feeding group (Table 3). Breastfeeding was found to have a significant protective effect against respiratory diseases in infants aged 3–5 months. Infants aged 6-8 months showed a significant protective effect against diarrhea. However, the protective effect on diarrhea among 0–2 months old infants was nearly reached statistical significance (p = 0.054).

4. Discussion

By using the national representative data, we described the status of breast and formula feeding in different sociodemographic population in China. Breastfeeding rates among infants under 1 year of age have been declining as they have grown older. Breastfeeding had a positive effect on weight gain in infants aged 6 months and up, according to our findings. However, no significant association has been observed between feeding pattern and body length gain in infants under the age of one. When compared to formula feeding, breastfeeding was linked to a lower risk of diarrhea and respiratory diseases. Despite these benefits, breastfeeding was associated with a lower hemoglobin level in infants older than 3 months.
Consistent with previous studies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], we found that sociodemographic, biomedical, behavioral, and maternal factors, such as family income and regional economic status, as well as maternal employment and education, were all strongly related to the infant feeding patterns. During the process of urbanization in China, the maternal employment rate has risen dramatically. Several studies have indicated that the duration of maternity leave has a significant impact on the sustainability of breastfeeding among female workers [38,39]. Our study found that infants under 3 months of age were mostly (91.70%) breastfed, while only half of the infants older than 9 months were breastfed. Breastfeeding rates in big cities, medium and small cities, normal rural areas, and poor rural areas were 68.8%, 68.2%, 82.0%, and 81.0%, respectively. With the increasing annual income per capita, the breastfeeding rate decreased from 78.5% to 69.4%. These results might be attributed to the employment of mothers. Previous studies had demonstrated that employed mothers were more likely to have lower breastfeeding rate than unemployed mothers [40,41,42,43]. In China, the legal maternity leave is 98 days, and can be extended up to seven months by the employers. This might explain the phenomenon of a high breastfeeding rate under 3 months compared to a low breastfeeding rate after 9 months. The childbearing age of mothers could be another factor affecting infant feeding practice. Previous studies have shown that older mothers are more likely to breastfeed, but this study found that the breastfeeding rates decreased as mothers’ ages increased. This might be related to the socio-economic status. Mothers with a maternal age of older than 35 years might be more likely to have a better economic status and a higher work participation, making it more difficult to breastfeed. As a result, national policies are critical in reducing the conflict between employment and sustained breastfeeding [39].
Breast milk is optimal and essential for infant growth and development, and provides a rich source of early nutrition for infant growth and development [44]. Consistent with previous study [45], our study suggested that weight and length gain showed no significant statistical difference among formula-fed infants and breastfed infants for infants aged under 6 months. As for infants 6–11 months, we found that breastfeeding had some benefit on weight gain. According to a previous study, even if breastfeeding infants have a higher weight and BMI than bottle feeding infants, breastfeeding was still associated with a reduction in the odds of overweight and obesity [46]. On the other hand, the proportion of energy from complementary foods largely increased among infants aged 9–11 months, which may present addition confounding factors influencing physical development. Nevertheless, these results reflected that breast milk alone cannot provide sufficient nutrients for infant growth and development was a misperception [47]. However, there are still a number of mothers who do not have sufficient breast milk to ensure baby’s growth. Moreover, preterm infants and infants with specific diseases need special medical formula to ensure their growth [48]. Therefore, formula is essential for these infants.
Evidence has shown that breastfeeding is associated with reduced infant morbidity and mortality attributable to diarrheal and respiratory diseases. A cohort study had demonstrated that an estimated 53% of diarrhea hospitalizations could have been prevented per month by exclusive breastfeeding and 31% by partial breastfeeding in the first 8 months after birth [49]. Another cohort study supports this result that formula feeding for ≥3 months was associated with higher odds of diarrhea between 6 and 12 months [50]. A recent systematic review showed that the pooled relative risk of diarrhea incidence among infants aged ≤ 6 months was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.27; 0.50) and was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.28; 0.78) among infants aged > 6 months [51]. Consistent with these previous studies, we found that breastfeeding was associated with a lower risk of diarrheal and respiratory diseases during the past two weeks in infants under 12 months of age. This could be due to formula-fed infants having fewer opportunities to receive antibodies and bacterial communities from their mothers [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Many studies have shown that the likelihood of anemia might increase by exclusive breastfeeding for six months and continued breastfeeding after 6 months [53,54]. This study found that breastfed infants had lower hemoglobin level than that of formula-fed infants, except for the 0–2 months group. However, infants in our study were relatively heavy and had high z-scores of lengths for age and weight for age, especially those breastfeeding infants. This was consistent with two Chinese cohort studies, which showed that breastfeeding beyond six months of age was associated with poor iron status and anemia [55]. In China, the home-made complementary foods for infants were mostly plant-based, the same as that for adults. Parents tended to provide plant-based complementary foods, such as cereal, vegetables, and fruits before animal food, which could help infants to satisfy their iron and zinc requirements [56]. Although the benefits of breastfeeding are indisputable, these findings imply that we should monitor hemoglobin level in infants with prolonged breastfeeding duration. The caregivers should introduce iron-containing complementary foods in time, such as liver paste, yolk, and meat paste, especially in infants who were exclusively breastfed.
This study has several strengths. By use of the most recent nationally representative data available, it provides an up-to-date description of breastfeeding and formula feeding among infants under one year in China. In case of multiple confound variables of infant physical development and diarrheal and respiratory diseases, we adopted a propensity score matching method to control various potential sources of biases, including sociodemographic, biomedical, behavioral, and maternal factors.
The method and data suffer from some limitations. First, although being a powerful and commonly used approach for decreasing bias in observational studies, propensity score matching has statistical limitations. Despite many covariates had been considered in our analysis, some important factors that could affect infants’ physical development were left out due to a lack of data, such as seasonal influence, vaccination information, the amount of breastmilk and formula intake, daily dietary energy intake from complementary food, mother’s lifestyle during pregnancy, and maternal dietary intake during pregnancy and during lactation. Second, due to the lack of the proportion of breastmilk and formula intake, predominated milk for the infants were unclear. Thus, the effect of mixed feeding was not considered. Third, due to the lack of information, further studies should be conducted to learn about the association between feeding patterns and other diseases, for example allergies, which are also critical health outcomes for infants.
Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, this study included the largest and representative infant sample in China, and may thus be useful for illustrating the relation between feeding patterns and health status among 0–11 months infants.

5. Conclusions

Breastfeeding and formula feeding has similar effect on infant physical development. Breastfeeding provided protection against diarrheal and respiratory illnesses. Infants aged 3–11 months who were breastfeeding had lower hemoglobin than that of formula-fed infant, indicating that they should consume more iron rich complementary foods. In conclusion, the findings of our study suggest that infants within 12 months should keep breastfeeding, and that policies are needed to achieve longer breastfeeding durations.

Author Contributions

The authors contributions were as follows: Y.F., Y.L. and Y.H. designed the study; Y.F. and Y.L. analysis the data; Y.F. wrote the draft; Y.F., Z.Y., Y.D. and Y.H. performed the surveys; Z.Y. and Y.H. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC1601003) and the Major program for Health Care Reform from the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission (No. 20120212).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Institute for Nutrition and Health, China CDC (protocol code 2013–018 and 15 March 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data cannot be used publicly.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge all the participants in our study and all the staff working for the China National Nutrition and Health Survey 2013 (CNNHS 2013) from 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gartner, L.M.; Morton, J.; Lawrence, R.A.; Naylor, A.J.; O’Hare, D.; Schanler, R.J.; Eidelman, A.I. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2005, 115, 496–506. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fewtrell, M.; Wilson, D.C.; Booth, I.; Lucas, A. Six months of exclusive breast feeding: How good is the evidence? BMJ 2010, 342, c5955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Arifeen, S.; Black, R.E.; Antelman, G.; Baqui, A.; Caulfield, L.; Becker, S. Exclusive breastfeeding reduces acute respiratory infection and diarrhea deaths among infants in Dhaka slums. Pediatrics 2001, 108, E67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Davisse-Paturet, C.; Adel-Patient, K.; Divaret-Chauveau, A.; Pierson, J.; Lioret, S.; Cheminat, M.; Dufourg, M.; Charles, M.; de Lauzon-Guillain, B. Breastfeeding Status and Duration and Infections, Hospitalizations for Infections, and Antibiotic Use in the First Two Years of Life in the ELFE Cohort. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Victora, C.G.; Bahl, R.; Barros, A.J.; França, G.V.; Horton, S.; Krasevec, J.; Murch, S.; Sankar, M.J.; Walker, N.; Rollins, N.C. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016, 387, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Quesada, J.A.; Méndez, I.; Martín-Gil, R. The economic benefits of increasing breastfeeding rates in Spain. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2020, 15, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Field, C.J. The immunological components of human milk and their effect on immune development in infants. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Eiwegger, T.; Stahl, B.; Schmitt, J.; Boehm, G.; Gerstmayr, M.; Pichler, J.; Dehlink, E.; Loibichler, C.; Urbanek, R.; Szépfalusi, Z. Human milk—Derived oligosaccharides and plant-derived oligosaccharides stimulate cytokine production of cord blood T-cells in vitro. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hunt, K.M.; Foster, J.A.; Forney, L.J.; Schütte, U.; Beck, D.L.; Zaid, A.; Fox, L.K.; Williams, J.E.; Mcguire, M.K.; Mcguire, M.A. Characterization of the Diversity and Temporal Stability of Bacterial Communities in Human Milk. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Assembly, W. Global Strategy for Infants and Young Child Feeding; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu, F.; Qiu, L.; Binns, C.W.; Liu, X. Breastfeeding in China: A review. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2009, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wu, H.H.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zong, X.N.; Li, H. Changes of feeding patterns in Chinese city children under 2 years from 1985 to 2015: Results from a series of national cross-sectional surveys. World J. Pediatr. 2019, 15, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duan, Y.; Yang, Z.; Lai, J.; Yu, D.; Chang, S.; Pang, X.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, H.; Bi, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Exclusive Breastfeeding Rate and Complementary Feeding Indicators in China: A National Representative Survey in 2013. Nutrients 2018, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Druet, C.; Stettler, N.; Sharp, S.; Simmons, R.K.; Ong, K.K. Prediction of childhood obesity by infancy weight gain: An individual-level meta-analysis. Paediatr. Perinat Epidemiol. 2011, 26, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yan, J.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, G.; Wang, P.P. The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bell, K.A.; Wagner, C.L.; Feldman, H.A.; Shypailo, R.J.; Belfort, M.B. Associations of infant feeding with trajectories of body composition and growth. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fall, C.H.; Borja, J.B.; Osmond, C.; Richter, L.; Bhargava, S.K.; Martorell, R.; Stein, A.D.; Barros, F.C.; Victora, C.G. Infant-feeding patterns and cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood: Data from five cohorts in low- and middle-income countries. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 40, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Graulau, R.E.; Banna, J.; Campos, M.; Gibby, C.; Palacios, C. Amount, Preparation and Type of Formula Consumed and Its Association with Weight Gain in Infants Participating in the WIC Program in Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Nutrients 2019, 11, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Patro-Gołąb, B.; Zalewski, B.M.; Polaczek, A.; Szajewska, H. Duration of Breastfeeding and Early Growth: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. Breastfeed. Med. 2019, 14, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bernardo, H.; Cesar, V.; World Health Organization. Long-Term Effects of Breastfeeding a Systematic Review; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. Arora, A.; Manohar, N.; Hayen, A.; Bhole, S.; Eastwood, J.; Levy, S.; Scott, J.A. Determinants of breastfeeding initiation among mothers in Sydney, Australia: Findings from a birth cohort study. Int. Breastfeed J. 2017, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hayashida, K.; Nakatsuka, M. Promoting factors of physical and mental development in early infancy: A comparison of preterm delivery/low birth weight infants and term infants. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2014, 19, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Walker, S.P.; Wachs, T.D.; Gardner, J.M.; Lozoff, B.; Wasserman, G.A.; Pollitt, E.; Carter, J.A. Child development: Risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet 2007, 369, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Black, R.E. Patterns of Growth in Early Childhood and Infectious Disease and Nutritional Determinants. Nestle Nutr. Inst. Workshop Ser. 2017, 87, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. El, H.C.; Nunes, M.L. Sleep and weight-height development. J. Pediatr. 2019, 95 (Suppl. S1), S2–S9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chaput, J.P.; Gray, C.E.; Poitras, V.J.; Carson, V.; Gruber, R.; Birken, C.S.; MacLean, J.E.; Aubert, S.; Sampson, M.; Tremblay, M.S. Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gross, R.S.; Mendelsohn, A.L.; Yin, H.S.; Tomopoulos, S.; Gross, M.B.; Scheinmann, R.; Messito, M.J. Randomized controlled trial of an early child obesity prevention intervention: Impacts on infant tummy time. Obesity 2017, 25, 920–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Grote, V.; Theurich, M.; Luque, V.; Gruszfeld, D.; Verduci, E.; Xhonneux, A.; Koletzko, B. Complementary Feeding, Infant Growth, and Obesity Risk: Timing, Composition, and Mode of Feeding. Nestle Nutr. Inst. Workshop Ser. 2018, 89, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Vehapoglu, A.; Yazıcı, M.; Demir, A.D.; Turkmen, S.; Nursoy, M.; Ozkaya, E. Early infant feeding practice and childhood obesity: The relation of breast-feeding and timing of solid food introduction with childhood obesity. J. Pediatric Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 27, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goldstein, R.F.; Abell, S.K.; Ranasinha, S.; Misso, M.; Boyle, J.A.; Black, M.H.; Li, N.; Hu, G.; Corrado, F.; Rode, L.; et al. Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Maternal and Infant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2017, 317, 2207–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kattula, D.; Sarkar, R.; Sivarathinaswamy, P.; Velusamy, V.; Venugopal, S.; Naumova, E.N.; Muliyil, J.; Ward, H.; Kang, G. The first 1000 days of life: Prenatal and postnatal risk factors for morbidity and growth in a birth cohort in southern India. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Lenja, A.; Demissie, T.; Yohannes, B.; Yohannis, M. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practice to infants aged less than six months in Offa district, Southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2016, 11, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. WHO. Child Growth Standards based on lengthheight, weight and age. Acta Paediatr. 2006, 95, 76–85. [Google Scholar]
  34. Guidelines on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep for Children under 5 Years of Age; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  35. Rasmussen, K.; Yaktine, A. Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  36. Morgan, C.J. Reducing bias using propensity score matching. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018, 25, 404–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rosenbaum, P.R.; Rubin, D.B. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 1983, 70, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guendelman, S.; Kosa, J.L.; Pearl, M.; Graham, S.; Goodman, J.; Kharrazi, M. Juggling Work and Breastfeeding: Effects of Maternity Leave and Occupational Characteristics. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Steurer, L.M. Maternity Leave Length and Workplace Policies’ Impact on the Sustainment of Breastfeeding: Global Perspectives. Public Health Nurs. 2017, 34, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abou-ElWafa, H.S.; El-Gilany, A.H. Maternal work and exclusive breastfeeding in Mansoura, Egypt. Fam. Pract. 2019, 36, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ickes, S.B.; Oddo, V.M.; Sanders, H.K.; Nduati, R.; Denno, D.M.; Myhre, J.A.; Kinyua, J.; Iannotti, L.L.; Singa, B.; Farquhar, C.; et al. Formal maternal employment is associated with lower odds of exclusive breastfeeding by 14 weeks postpartum: A cross-sectional survey in Naivasha, Kenya. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 113, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baker, M.; Milligan, K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: Evidence from maternity leave mandates. J. Health Econ. 2008, 27, 871–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ogbuanu, C.; Glover, S.; Probst, J.; Liu, J.; Hussey, J. The effect of maternity leave length and time of return to work on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2011, 127, e1414–e1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gay, M.C.L.; Koleva, P.T.; Slupsky, C.M.; Toit, E.D.; Eggesbo, M.; Johnson, C.C.; Wegienka, G.; Shimojo, N.; Campbell, D.E.; Prescott, S.L.; et al. Worldwide Variation in Human Milk Metabolome: Indicators of Breast Physiology and Maternal Lifestyle? Nutrients 2018, 10, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zong, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H. Growth performance comparison of exclusively breastfed infants with partially breastfed and formula fed infants. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e237067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Horta, B.L.; Loret, D.M.C.; Victora, C.G. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yadanar; Mya, K.S.; Witvorapong, N. Determinants of breastfeeding practices in Myanmar: Results from the latest nationally representative survey. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e239515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gianni, M.L.; Roggero, P.; Mosca, F. Human milk protein vs. formula protein and their use in preterm infants. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2019, 22, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Quigley, M.A.; Kelly, Y.J.; Sacker, A. Breastfeeding and hospitalization for diarrheal and respiratory infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study. Pediatrics 2007, 119, e837–e842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Diallo, A.F.; McGlothen-Bell, K.; Lucas, R.; Walsh, S.; Allen, C.; Henderson, W.A.; Cong, X.; McGrath, J. Feeding modes, duration, and diarrhea in infancy: Continued evidence of the protective effects of breastfeeding. Public Health Nurs. 2020, 37, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Horta, B.L.; Victora, C.G.; World Health Organization. Short-Term Effects of Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review on the Benefits of Breastfeeding on Diarrhoea and Pneumonia Mortality; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hosea, B.H.; Cicalo, M.C.; Holland, C.D.; Field, C.J. The immunological components of human milk. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2008, 54, 45–80. [Google Scholar]
  53. Dalili, H.; Baghersalimi, A.; Dalili, S.; Pakdaman, F.; Hassanzadeh, R.A.; Abbasi, K.M.; Rezvany, S.M.; Koohmanaei, S. Is there any relation between Duration of breastfeeding and anemia? Iran J. Ped. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 5, 218–226. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Wan, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, J.; Huang, T.; Li, D. Prolonged Exclusive Breastfeeding Duration Is Positively Associated with Risk of Anemia in Infants Aged 12 Months. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1707–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Clark, K.M.; Li, M.; Zhu, B.; Liang, F.; Shao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, C.; Zhao, Z.; Kaciroti, N.; Lozoff, B. Breastfeeding, Mixed, or Formula Feeding at 9 Months of Age and the Prevalence of Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anemia in Two Cohorts of Infants in China. J. Pediatr. 2017, 181, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Jing, S.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, S.; Jian, H.; Yang, Z.; Huo, J.; Chen, C. Implementation of a programme to market a complementary food supplement (Ying Yang Bao) and impacts on anaemia and feeding practices in Shanxi, China. Matern. Child Nutr. 2011, 7, 96–111. [Google Scholar]
Nutrients 13 04518 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart of study participants selection.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study participants selection.
Nutrients 13 04518 g001
Nutrients 13 04518 g002a 550Nutrients 13 04518 g002b 550
Figure 2. (a) Body length in breastfeeding and formula feeding 0–2, 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11 month infants was 58.0 ± 4.4 vs. 59.1 ± 5.9, 65.4 ± 3.2 vs. 65.5 ± 4.5, 70.8 ± 3.7 vs. 71.0 ± 4.0, and 73.8 ± 3.5 vs. 73.8 ± 3.5, respectively; (b) body weight in breastfeeding and formula feeding 0–2, 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11 month infants was 6.0 ± 1.2 vs. 6.3 ± 1.8, 7.9 ± 1.2 vs. 7.8 ± 1.7, 9.3 ± 1.5 vs. 9.0 ± 1.2, and 10.0 ± 1.4 vs. 9.8 ± 1.7, respectively; (c) hemoglobin in breastfeeding and formula feeding 0–2, 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11month infants was 121.4 ± 15.2 vs. 116.3 ± 14.8, 117.1 ± 13.0 vs. 120.4 ± 11.3, 113.9 ± 11.9 vs. 119.8 ± 11.2, and 114.4 ± 14.0 vs. 120.0 ± 11.5, respectively; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. (a) Body length in breastfeeding and formula feeding 0–2, 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11 month infants was 58.0 ± 4.4 vs. 59.1 ± 5.9, 65.4 ± 3.2 vs. 65.5 ± 4.5, 70.8 ± 3.7 vs. 71.0 ± 4.0, and 73.8 ± 3.5 vs. 73.8 ± 3.5, respectively; (b) body weight in breastfeeding and formula feeding 0–2, 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11 month infants was 6.0 ± 1.2 vs. 6.3 ± 1.8, 7.9 ± 1.2 vs. 7.8 ± 1.7, 9.3 ± 1.5 vs. 9.0 ± 1.2, and 10.0 ± 1.4 vs. 9.8 ± 1.7, respectively; (c) hemoglobin in breastfeeding and formula feeding 0–2, 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11month infants was 121.4 ± 15.2 vs. 116.3 ± 14.8, 117.1 ± 13.0 vs. 120.4 ± 11.3, 113.9 ± 11.9 vs. 119.8 ± 11.2, and 114.4 ± 14.0 vs. 120.0 ± 11.5, respectively; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Nutrients 13 04518 g002aNutrients 13 04518 g002b
Table
Table 1. Infant, family, and maternal characteristics before and after matching, N (%).
Table 1. Infant, family, and maternal characteristics before and after matching, N (%).
CovariatesBefore MatchingAfter Matching
BreastfeedingFormula Feedingp-ValueBreastfeedingFormula Feedingp-Value
N28921082 941941
Age (day)177.4 ± 90.4247.6 ± 88.9<0.001235.7 ± 89.8236.5 ± 89.00.888
Age group <0.001 1.000
  0–2 months549 (19.0)71(6.6) 71 (7.6)71 (7.6)
  3–5 months1081 (37.4)206(19.0) 204 (20.7)204 (20.7)
  6–8 months716 (24.8)290(26.8) 278 (29.5)278 (29.5)
  9–11 months546 (18.9)515 (47.6) 388 (41.2)388 (41.2)
Sex 0.811 0.782
  Boys1469 (50.8)545 (50.4) 472 (50.2)478 (50.8)
  Girls1423 (49.2)537 (49.6) 469 (49.8)463 (49.2)
Area <0.001 0.670
  Big city673 (23.3)334 (30.9) 288 (30.6)292 (31.0)
  Medium and small city807 (27.9)412 (38.1) 307 (32.6)327 (34.8)
  Normal rural1043 (36.1)245 (22.6) 246 (26.1)231 (24.5)
  Poor rural369 (12.8)91 (8.4) 100 (10.6)91 (9.7)
Annual income per capita <0.001 0.973
  Low997 (34.5)290 (26.8) 271 (28.8)275 (29.2)
  Medium851 (29.4)284 (26.2) 247 (26.2)242 (25.7)
  High781 (27.0)384 (35.5) 322 (34.2)318 (33.8)
  Unknown263 (9.1)124 (11.5) 101 (10.7)106 (11.3)
Born to term 0.002 1.000
  Term2598 (89.8)935 (86.4) 823 (87.5)823 (87.5)
  Preterm294(10.2)147(13.6) 118(12.5)118(12.5)
Birth weight <0.001 0.545
  <2500 g50(1.7)66(6.1) 35(3.7)44(4.7)
  2500–4000 g2682(92.7)970(89.6) 865(91.9)853(90.6)
  >4000 g160(5.5)46(4.3) 41(4.4)44(4.7)
Sleep duration 0.013 0.886
  Sufficient1727(59.7)693(64.0) 598(63.5)595(63.2)
  Insufficient1165(40.3)389(36.0) 343(36.5)346(36.8)
Physical activity time <0.001 0.806
  High1390 (48.1)761 (70.3) 633 (67.3)628 (66.7)
  Low1502 (51.9)321 (29.7) 308 (32.7)313 (33.3)
Types of complementary food4.2 ± 2.23.0 ± 2.4<0.0013.8 ± 2.44.0 ± 2.20.201
Maternal age 0.057 0.979
  <20 years old118 (4.1)32 (3) 30 (3.2)29 (3.1)
  20–35 years old2572 (88.9)956 (88.4) 831 (88.3)830 (88.2)
  >35 years old202 (7.0)94 (8.7) 80 (8.5)82 (8.7)
Gestational weight gain 0.560 0.872
  Insufficient784 (27.1)278 (25.7) 231 (24.5)236 (25.1)
  Appropriate1051 (36.3)391 (36.1) 345 (36.7)351 (37.3)
  Excessive1057 (36.5)413 (38.2) 365 (38.8)354 (37.6)
Mother’s education <0.001 0.995
  Elementary school or below258 (8.9)74 (6.8) 68(7.2)69 (7.3)
  Junior school1396 (48.3)391 (36.1) 362(38.5)361 (38.4)
  High school579 (20.0)266 (24.6) 222(23.6)218 (23.2)
  College and above659 (22.8)351 (32.4) 289 (30.7)293 (31.1)
Mother’s occupation <0.001 0.827
  Professionals614 (21.2)349 (32.3) 259 (27.5)271 (28.8)
  Agricultural industry334 (11.5)86 (7.9) 77 (8.2)76 (8.1)
  Others1944 (67.2)647 (59.8) 605 (64.3)594 (63.1)
Table
Table 2. Infant physical development in breastfeeding and formula feeding group after matching.
Table 2. Infant physical development in breastfeeding and formula feeding group after matching.
Breast FeedingFormula Feeding
0–2 months
  weight-for-age z score1.3 ± 1.61.5 ± 2.4
  length-for-age z score0.4 ± 2.10.7 ± 3.1
  weight-for-length z score1.1 ± 1.81.0 ± 1.9
3–5 months
  weight-for-age z score1.2 ± 1.11.0 ± 1.6
  length-for-age z score0.7 ± 1.20.6 ± 1.7
  weight-for-length z score0.9 ± 1.30.6 ± 1.7
6–8 months
  weight-for-age z score1.3 ± 1.21.1 ± 1.0
  length-for-age z score0.7 ± 1.60.7 ± 1.7
  weight-for-length z score0.9 ± 1.40.6 ± 1.4 *
9–11 months
  weight-for-age z score1.1 ± 1.10.9 ± 1.3 *
  length-for-age z score0.3 ± 1.30.3 ± 1.3
  weight-for-length z score1.0 ± 1.30.7 ± 1.4 **
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 3. Association between breastfeeding and prevalence of respiratory diseases and diarrhea in the last two weeks, N (%).
Table 3. Association between breastfeeding and prevalence of respiratory diseases and diarrhea in the last two weeks, N (%).
NRespiratory DiseasesOR (95% CI)DiarrheaOR (95% CI)
0–2 months
    Formula feeding 718 (11.3)ref10 (14.1)ref
    Breastfeeding 713 (4.2)0.35 (0.09, 1.37)3(4.2)0.27 (0.07, 1.02)
3–5 months
    Formula feeding 19138 (18.6)ref29 (14.2)ref
    Breastfeeding 19123 (11.3)0.56 (0.32, 0.97) *23 (11.3)0.77 (0.43, 1.38)
6–8 months
    Formula feeding 27865 (23.4)ref42 (15.1)ref
    Breastfeeding 27861 (21.9)0.92 (0.62, 1.37)25 (9.0)0.56 (0.33, 0.94) *
9–11 months
    Formula feeding 388105 (27.1)ref53 (13.7)ref
    Breastfeeding 38893 (24.3)0.85 (0.61, 1.17)53 (13.7)1.00 (0.66, 1.51)
Total
    Formula feeding 928216 (23.3)ref134 (14.4)ref
    Breastfeeding 928180 (19.4)0.79 (0.64, 0.99) *104 (11.2)0.75 (0.57, 0.98) *
* p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, Y.; Lian, Y.; Yang, Z.; Duan, Y.; He, Y. Associations between Feeding Patterns and Infant Health in China: A Propensity Score Matching Approach. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4518. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124518

AMA Style

Fang Y, Lian Y, Yang Z, Duan Y, He Y. Associations between Feeding Patterns and Infant Health in China: A Propensity Score Matching Approach. Nutrients. 2021; 13(12):4518. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Yuehui, Yiyao Lian, Zhenyu Yang, Yifan Duan, and Yuna He. 2021. "Associations between Feeding Patterns and Infant Health in China: A Propensity Score Matching Approach" Nutrients 13, no. 12: 4518. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124518

APA Style

Fang, Y., Lian, Y., Yang, Z., Duan, Y., & He, Y. (2021). Associations between Feeding Patterns and Infant Health in China: A Propensity Score Matching Approach. Nutrients, 13(12), 4518. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124518

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop