Next Article in Journal
Causes of Vitamin K Deficiency in Patients on Haemodialysis
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Unhealthy Dietary Habits and Proteinuria Onset in a Japanese General Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/nu12092512
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Influence of Iron on the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer

by
Oliver Phipps
1,*,
Hafid O. Al-Hassi
1,
Mohammed N. Quraishi
2,
Aditi Kumar
1,3 and
Matthew J. Brookes
1,3
1
Research Institute in Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK
2
Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
3
Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Gastroenterology Unit, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(9), 2512; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092512
Submission received: 9 July 2020 / Revised: 7 August 2020 / Accepted: 14 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Nutrition)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Perturbations of the colonic microbiota can contribute to the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer, leading to an increase in pathogenic bacteria at the expense of protective bacteria. This can contribute to disease through increasing carcinogenic metabolite/toxin production, inducing inflammation, and activating oncogenic signaling. To limit disease progression, external factors that may influence the colonic microbiota need to be considered in patients with colorectal cancer. One major factor that can influence the colonic microbiota is iron. Iron is an essential micronutrient that is required by both prokaryotes and eukaryotes for cellular function. Most pathogenic bacteria have heightened iron acquisition mechanisms and therefore tend to outcompete protective bacteria for free iron. Colorectal cancer patients often present with anemia due to iron deficiency, and thus they require iron therapy. Depending upon the route of administration, iron therapy has the potential to contribute to a procarciongenic microbiota. Orally administered iron is the common treatment for anemia in these patients but can lead to an increased gut iron concentration. This suggests the need to reassess the route of iron therapy in these patients. Currently, this has only been assessed in murine studies, with human trials being necessary to unravel the potential microbial outcomes of iron therapy.

1. Introduction

The gut microbiota comprises an intricate population of microorganisms, which exert a complex relationship with their host during both homeostasis and disease. Numerous gastrointestinal diseases, including colorectal cancer, are associated with changes in gut microbiota compared to healthy controls [1]. These perturbations, often referred to as dysbiosis, may have a role in contributing to disease mechanisms associated with colitis, tumor initiation, and tumor progression [2,3]. This dysregulation in the gut microbiota is potentially associated with a shift away from strains of bacteria beneficial to the host (symbionts), which act to limit the development of such diseases, substituting with potentially pathogenic bacteria (pathobionts) that can contribute to inflammation and carcinogenic metabolite production [4]. As microbial alterations are pre-existent in colorectal cancer, special care needs to be considered in order to limit external influences that may further shift microbial populations towards a procarciongenic microbiota [5]. One critical factor that needs to be considered is iron, as this nutrient is required by many bacterial cells to grow and survive [6]. Patients with colorectal cancer often present with anemia due to iron deficiency and are subsequently treated with iron supplements. If enteral iron is given, this can contribute to an increased luminal iron pool within the gut [7,8]. Many pathogenic bacteria have high-affinity iron acquisition mechanisms such as siderophores and transferrin/lactoferrin receptors to obtain free iron from their environment. Therefore, excessive luminal iron may select for pathogenic bacteria at the expense of beneficial commensal bacteria [9,10]. The role of increased iron in promoting pathogenic bacteria has been evaluated in an in vitro study by Kortman et al., who assessed the growth of prevalent enteric pathogens in high and low iron cultures. Growth of pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella typhimurium was increased in response to high iron and showed increased adhesion and invasion of colorectal cancer cells [11]. This supports the idea that oral iron supplementation can promote the growth and potentially the virulence of pathogenic bacteria through increasing colonic iron availability [9,11]. Increased colonic iron concentration through iron supplementation has also been shown to promote pathogenic bacterial species in iron-deficient Kenyan infants while decreasing protective bacteria such as Bifidobacteria and lactobacillus. This supports the role of increased luminal iron promoting pathogenic bacteria at the expense of beneficial bacteria, however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood [12,13]. The relationship between the microbiota and colorectal cancer will be discussed in this review, focusing on how iron can alter bacterial populations and the outcomes of iron supplementation.

2. Microbiota in Colonic Homeostasis and Disease

2.1. Gut Microbiota

The human intestine provides a platform for a complex and dynamic ecosystem, consisting of greater than 1013 microorganisms. This collection of microorganisms residing within the gastrointestinal tract consists of bacteria, viruses, and fungi and is collectively termed the gut microbiota [14]. The gut microbiota consists of over 400 bacterial species that colonize the lumen and mucosa of the colon but do not penetrate a healthy bowel wall [3]. The predominant phyla residing within the gut are Firmicutes (≈49–76%), Bacteroidetes (≈16–23%), Proteobacteria (<10%) and Actinobacteria (<5%), with a large diversity at the lower taxonomic levels [9].
Bacterial colonization of the colon can be either commensal or pathogenic [15]. Commensal bacteria can either derive benefit from the host, but the host receives no benefit or harm from the bacteria, or commensal bacteria can provide a mutualistic relationship with the host when both bacteria and host benefit. This can act to maintain host homeostasis through contributing to fiber digestion, synthesis of vitamins, and enterohepatic deconjugation of metabolites [16]. These commensal bacteria also contribute host defense against colonic invasion of pathogens, due to both requiring an analogous ecological niche. Hence, under normal physiological conditions, the commensal bacteria act to outcompete potential pathogenic colonization of the colon, therefore preventing infection [17]. The gut microbiota generally have a commensal relationship with their host. Nevertheless, there is the potential for this relationship to be disrupted through an alteration in the composition of bacteria. This occurs through an imbalance in bacterial populations through the replacement of non-harmful commensal bacteria with pathogenic bacteria. These pathogenic bacteria can cause harm to the host through invading the bowel wall, causing inflammation and inducing carcinogenic signaling and metabolites [18]. Therefore, these bacteria have the potential to contribute to tumorigenesis in the colon; however, what remains unclear is whether the presence of these bacteria are the cause or consequence of colorectal cancer [2]. Many studies, as discussed in this review, support the role of the microbiota in the development of colorectal cancer. However, tumors themselves have the ability to shape the composition of the microbiota, with tumor genetic profiles being able to differentially influence the microbiota [19]. This has been assessed in colorectal tumors in a study by Burns et al., showing that prevalent loss of function (LoF) mutations in cancer-related genes, including APC, ANKRD36C, CTBP2, KMT2C, and ZNF71, are correlated with defined bacterial populations. The LoF mutations were linked with microbial profiles that were associated with cancer pathways, including mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and Wnt signaling [20]. This suggests that the tumor has the ability to regulate the microbiota, through cancer genetics, in order to potentially support tumor progression [19,20].

2.2. Bacteria and Cancer

The correlation between bacterial infection and cancer is predominantly through three mechanisms: initiating chronic inflammation, producing carcinogenic metabolites and toxins, and activating oncogenic signaling (Figure 1) [21]. The most prominent association between bacteria and cancer is Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer [22]. Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative bacterium that colonizes the lining of the stomach. Here, it may induce chronic gastritis, which can contribute to the development of gastric ulcers and stomach cancer [23,24]. Helicobacter pylori also produce virulence factors such as cytotoxin-associated gene A and vacuolating cytotoxin A, which can contribute to the damage and malignant transformation of the gastric epithelia [25]. It is estimated that Helicobacter pylori-positive patients have a 10–20% lifetime risk of developing peptic ulcers and a 1–2% risk of developing gastric cancer [26]. Helicobacter pylori have also been associated with other pathologies such as colorectal polyps and cancer [27].
The association between Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer has been confirmed through fulfilling Koch’s postulates, as Helicobacter pylori infection can lead to gastric cancer in a susceptible host [28,29]. The same association has not been confirmed between other gastrointestinal pathologies such as colorectal cancer and a single bacterial species [30]. Rather, a general community shift in bacterial population has been suggested to contribute to colorectal cancer [31]. However, further work is required to determine if a specific microbial profile can fulfill Koch’s postulate criteria, proving a causative relationship between a colonic microbial profile and colorectal cancer [32]. Within this review, we discuss prominent examples of bacterial species involved in colorectal cancer. An extensive list of pathobionts and symbionts involved in colorectal cancer are summarized in Table 1.

3. Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer

Cancer occurrence in the large intestines is approximately 12-fold higher than the small intestines [33]. This may be credited to the much greater bacterial density in the large intestines (≈1012 cells per mL) compared to small intestines (≈102 cells per mL) [34]. Supporting a role of microbiota and colorectal cancer, mice that are genetically susceptible to colorectal cancer display a significantly reduced frequency of oncogenic mutations and tumor formation when germ-free, compared to those in the presence of a conventional microbiota [35]. This suggests that the presence of colonic bacteria may potentially contribute to the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer [36]. Similarly, common risk factors for the development of colorectal cancer such as inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, and a diet rich in fat and protein have all been associated with alterations of the microbiota [2,37]. This implies a change in bacterial populations within the gut of colorectal cancer patients, which may include an increase in pathogenic cancer-associated bacteria and a loss of protective anti-cancer bacteria. Supporting this, comparisons of gut microbiota between normal individual and colorectal cancer patients reveals that the predominant flora in colorectal cancer are pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli strains harboring polyketide synthase (pks) pathogenicity islands, enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum [38,39,40]. On the other hand, beneficial strains of bacteria such as butyrate-producing species have been shown to be under-represented in colorectal cancers, which is consistent with a reduced amount butyrate being seen in the stool of colorectal cancer patients compared to normal individuals [41]. The relationship between bacteria and colorectal cancer is complex and unclear, with symbionts and pathobionts having conflicting roles in the pathogenesis of the disease [30]. What is also unclear is defining the role of the bacteria in the stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, with bacteria involved in the initiation of colorectal cancer being described as bacterial drivers, which are then gradually outcompeted by opportunistic passenger bacteria that have a competitive advantage within the defined tumor microenvironment. These passenger bacteria can either promote or hinder cancer progression, depending on whether pathobionts or symbionts flourish in the tumor environment. Hence, external factors such as diet and medication have the potential to influence the tumor microbiota, depending on whether they support symbiont or pathobiont bacterial growth [34].

3.1. Pathobionts and Colorectal Cancer

The microbiota have the potential to contribute to both the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer through multiple mechanisms including inducing oncogenic signaling, producing carcinogenic metabolites and toxins, and modulating colonic inflammation, which is summarized in Figure 1. Persistent activation of the immune system, as seen in inflammation, can contribute to cancer through the production of growth factors and cytokines that can facilitate tumor growth, perturb differentiation, and promote cancer cell survival [42,43].
Species of the Clostridium genus, including Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium hylemonae, Clostridium sordelli, Clostridium scindens, and Clostridium hiranonis, along with Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides vulgatus and Listeria monocytogenes, have been shown to be involved in a multistep deconjugation and biotransformation process that synthesizes secondary bile acids from primary bile acids [44,45,46,47,48,49]. The usual role of primary bile acids is in lipid digestion and cholesterol metabolism; however, they are also implemented in host–microbe interactions. Primary bile acids are usually reabsorbed through the enterohepatic circulation; however, they can also act as substrates in bacterial biotransformation in the colon into secondary bile acids [50]. The secondary bile acids lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid have been associated with colonic polyps and colorectal cancer through increasing oxidative stress-induced colonic inflammation and activating the oncogenic signaling pathway Wnt [50,51,52,53,54,55]. A study by Nagengast et al. supported the role of secondary bile acids in the initiation of colorectal cancer. They determined that patients with colonic adenomas showed an increase in deoxycholic acids compared to healthy controls [56].
Hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria such as Bilophila wadsworthia, Bacteroides fragilis, Helicobacter pylori, Clostridium septicum, and Streptococcus bovis have also been implemented in the initiation of colorectal cancer. Hydrogen sulfide is a genotoxic substance that causes genomic instability through damaging DNA [57,58]. Similarly, hydrogen sulfide can diffuse into colonocytes and interfere with mitochondrial function, causing an increase in proliferative signaling through activation of the MAP kinase pathway [59]. Supporting the role of hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria in colorectal cancer, a study compared the microbiota of African Americans with and without colorectal cancer. A greater abundance of sulfidogenic bacteria in colorectal cancer patients were found when compared to healthy patients [57].
Microbiota associated with the progression of colorectal cancer includes the presence of the pathogenic bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum [60]. Fusobacterium nucleatum adheres to the colonic epithelium, where it can invade and induce inflammatory and oncogenic signaling pathways contributing to the growth of colorectal cancer cells. This is induced through Fusobacterium adhesin A (FadA)-induced activation of β-catenin signaling, with FadA levels in colonic tissue from patients with adenomas and adenocarcinomas being between 10 to 100 times greater than healthy individuals [61]. This has been shown to contribute to the progression of colorectal cancer, as patients with a high abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum tend to have more advanced disease with a poorer prognosis and shorter survival time [62,63].
Escherichia coli is a commensal bacteria residing within the colon, however, pathogenic strains of phylogenetic group B2 harbor the pks genomic island that can produce the genotoxin colibactin [64]. Colibactin can induce DNA double-strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations that can contribute to the development of sporadic colorectal cancer [65]. Colibactin-producing Escherichia coli has been found in 55–67% of colorectal cancer patients, compared to 20% of control patients [65]. Escherichia coli harboring pks has been shown to contribute to disease severity in mice predisposed to colorectal cancer [66], supporting a passenger role for Escherichia coli in colorectal cancer. However, given the potent genotoxic effects of colibactin and Escherichia coli harboring pks being able to induce colorectal cancer in animal models, a driver role is also plausible [67].
Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis is a pathogenic bacterium that produces the enterotoxin Bacteroides fragilis toxin (bft) and is associated with colorectal cancer initiation and progression [68]. This occurs through modulation of the mucosal immune system and inducing alterations in epithelial cells, leading to a compromised colonic barrier [57,69]. Enterotoxic Bacteroides fragilis has been associated with colonic pre-neoplastic lesions and has been suggested to be a potential biomarker for early detection of colorectal carcinogenesis [70]. In a study by Boleij et al., 72.7% of early-stage colorectal tumors had a bft gene present, while 100% of late-stage tumors had a bft gene present [68]. This supports the role of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in the progression of colorectal cancer, as late-stage tumors have more carcinogenic bacterial toxin Along with this, the abundance of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in colorectal mucosa has been shown to be an independent predictor of three-year survival [69,71]. This supports the potential role of enterotoxic Bacteroides fragilis as both a driver and pathogenic passenger bacterium in colorectal carcinogenesis [34].

3.2. Symbionts and Colorectal Cancer

In contrast, other bacterial populations can have a protective effect against colorectal cancer. For instance, Bifidobacterium thermophilum binds free iron to its surface, reducing iron for pathogenic bacterial growth and reducing free radical formation, both of which can contribute to cancer progression [75]. Likewise, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum have been seen to have a protective effect against cancer, forming a barrier against colonization by pathogenic bacteria and inactivating carcinogenic compounds [98,99].
Gut bacterial populations such as Bifidobacterium and Firmicutes produce the short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate, which is believed to possess anti-cancerous properties. Butyrate is a key energy source for colonocytes, maintaining intestinal epithelium integrity and playing a central role in regulating the stability of the microbiota [100,101,102]. Within colorectal cancer cells, butyrate is able to inhibit histone deacetylase, which leads to increased expression of genes involved in inhibiting the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis [103]. Butyrate can also control cancer through regulating immune homeostasis, leading to a reduction in pro-inflammatory immune cells and cytokines [104]. As butyrate is able to have a protective effect against cancer, this explains why patients with colorectal cancer have significantly reduced abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria compared to healthy patients [100]. Furthermore, murine studies have shown that supplementation with butyrate-producing bacteria and dietary fiber was associated with a reduction in tumor growth [105,106].
A study by Dai et al. assessed bacterial populations that tend to be upregulated and depleted in colorectal cancer. They found five protective bacteria that were decreased in colorectal cancer patients compared to controls. These included Clostridium butyricum, which promotes apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells and inhibits intestinal tumor development in mice [59]. This supports the depletion of protective bacterial species that can prevent or limit cancer growth in colorectal cancer, which can potentially be replaced by pathogenic species that support tumors [107].

4. Dysbiosis and Bacterial Iron Utilization

Environment, lifestyle, and dietary factors all play key roles in regulating the composition and function of the human microbiota [108]. Hence, these certain factors may alter the microbiota to potentially support tumorigenesis. Obesity, smoking, alcohol, and red and processed meat consumption have all been suggested to have a relationship between the microbiota and colorectal cancer [109]. Smoking has been shown to reduce the abundance of butyrate-producing Bifidobacterium, which has anti-inflammatory and anti-tumoral properties [110]. Likewise, obesity has been shown to promote colorectal cancer development through increasing microbial derived pro-inflammatory molecules, such as lipopolysaccharides, along with microbially induced epigenetic alterations [109,111]. Many dietary components have been shown to contribute to colorectal cancer. Red meat possesses procarciongenic properties through increasing secondary bile acids and hydrogen sulfide that can contribute to oxidative stress and cellular proliferation in colorectal cancer. Along with this, dietary heme iron from red meat has been shown to increase mucin-degrading bacteria, such as Akkermansia muciniphila, which can lead to an impairment of gut barrier function and contribute to colorectal disease [109].
Colonic nutrient availability is a key regulator of gut microbial populations and is regulated through diet [17]. Many dietary nutrients can regulate colonic bacterial populations, with a major contributor being iron [112]. Iron availability is vital for humans and microbes; hence, both multi- and unicellular organisms have developed strategies to obtain iron from their proximate environment through evolutionarily conserved methods [9]. Iron has a universal role required for protein and enzymatic function, as well as for energy production, and is essential to fundamental biological processes of cell growth and differentiation [113]. Humans obtain iron from their diet and through iron recycling within the body. Dietary iron comes in the form of heme iron from red meat and non-heme iron from dark green leafy vegetables [114,115]. Dependent on iron consumption, around 15% of dietary iron is absorbed within the duodenum, with the remnant passing into the large intestine where it has the potential to be utilized by colonic bacteria. These bacteria are able to produce high-affinity iron-chelating molecules called siderophores, as well as transferrin/lactoferrin receptors, which allow bacteria to scavenge for free iron within the colon. Iron is essential for both the survival and replication of nearly all bacteria [6,9].
A study by Parmanand et al. used an in vitro model to assess the effect of a decrease in gut iron availability on the microbiota. They found that the growth of potentially pathogenic bacterial species, such as Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, was significantly inhibited when cultured in an iron-deficient medium, whereas probiotic bacterial species such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus were unaffected by iron depletion [116]. This suggests a role of luminal iron in promoting the growth of pathogenic bacteria, but not of probiotic bacteria. This has been assessed in anemic African children who were given iron-fortified biscuits. Iron fortification increased the abundance of pathogenic enterobacteria while decreasing the abundance of beneficial lactobacilli. This change is also associated with increased gut inflammation, as shown by a raised fecal calprotectin concentration. This indicates that increasing dietary iron within this cohort contributes to gut dysbiosis, as well as suggesting that increasing pathogenic and decreasing beneficial bacterial populations has the potential to contribute to disease through inducing gut inflammation [117].
Iron regulation of bacterial populations within the gut presents a complex relationship, with iron having direct and indirect outcomes on bacterial populations. This can be seen in species of the Bacteroides genus that require both heme and non-heme iron for growth [118]. Bacteroides species present a prominent proportion of the gut microbiota, with different species showing pathogenic, probiotic, or both properties. Therefore, increasing iron colonic concentration has the potential to directly influence both pathogenic and probiotic Bacteroides species [119]. Iron regulation of probiotic Bacteroides species involved in the metabolism of undigested dietary fiber can also have an indirect influence on potentially pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli. This is through the production of a nutrient niche from the release of sialic acid from mucus and undigested carbohydrates. This facilitates Escherichia coli growth as they do not produce their own sialidase enzyme and are reliant on other residential bacteria [120]. Therefore, an increase in iron availability can have an indirect effect on bacterial populations through producing a nutrient niche by probiotic bacteria, which can be utilized to facilitate potential pathogenic bacterial growth, such as Escherichia coli harboring pks genomic islands [11].

5. Iron Supplementation, Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer

Alterations in the colonic microbiota play a key role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer through an increase in pathogenic bacterial populations at the expense of protective probiotic species [121]. Many pathogenic bacteria have heightened iron acquisition mechanisms to aid in their growth and virulence. This can alter microbial populations when there is an increase in gut luminal iron concentration [122,123,124]. Along with diet, oral iron supplementation to treat anemia can also contribute to luminal iron concentration and therefore has the potential to alter colonic bacterial populations [125]. Patients with colorectal cancer often present with iron deficiency anemia, which is commonly induced through chronic tumor-induced blood loss, impairment of iron homeostasis through chronic inflammatory disease, and reduced iron absorption [126]. Anemia in colorectal cancer patients is associated with postoperative complications and poorer patient outcomes; therefore, iron therapy is essential in order to correct anemia peri-operatively [126,127,128]. However, depending upon the route of administration, iron therapy can lead to an increase in luminal iron available for pathogenic bacteria [36]. Oral iron is currently the most common treatment for anemia in colorectal cancer patients, however, along with multiple gastrointestinal side effects such as abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and diarrhea, oral iron has the potential to increase procarciongenic bacterial populations [129,130].
The contribution of iron supplementation to microbial alterations in colorectal cancer has been assessed in murine studies. Constante et al. compared the effect of oral iron supplements to systemic iron supplementation. They found that oral heme iron altered microbial populations, inducing dysbiosis and specifically decreasing butyrate-producing taxa, which ultimately was associated with a decrease in fecal butyrate levels. Thus, oral iron has the potential to worsen disease by reducing butyrate, which has anti-inflammatory and anti-cancerous properties. This was confirmed by demonstrating that dietary heme worsened colitis with greater development of adenoma formation in the mouse model compared to systemic iron [131]. This suggests that the use of intravenous iron supplementation could be more beneficial than oral iron, potentially reducing microbial changes, inflammation, and colorectal cancer progression. These murine studies require detailed exploration with a view to translation into human clinical trials in order to confirm the microbial implications of oral iron therapy before this can lead to a change in the clinical administration of iron to treat anemia in colorectal cancer.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer compared to the general population. Similar to colorectal cancer, the pathology of inflammatory bowel disease involves alterations in the microbiota and is also associated with anemia, with patients requiring iron therapy [132,133]. Human clinical studies investigating oral iron against intravenous iron therapy on the intestinal microbiota in patients with inflammatory bowel disease have been conducted by Lee et al. They found that oral iron differentially altered both bacterial phylotypes and fecal metabolites compared to intravenous iron therapy notably leading to a decreased Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Ruminococcus bromi abundance following oral iron therapy [122]. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an abundant bacteria in a healthy gut microbiota that possesses anti-inflammatory properties through producing butyrate [134,135]. Likewise, Ruminococcus bromi is involved in butyrate production through degrading resistant starch particles [136]. A decreased abundance of these bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease patients can, therefore, contribute to the pathogenesis of disease through contributing to inflammation [137]. As inflammatory bowel disease can be a premalignant condition, the microbial mechanisms underpinning the pathology of the condition may have a similarity to those in colorectal cancer [132]. Hence, the negative impact of oral iron therapy on the microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease may act as an indicator of the potential outcomes in colorectal cancer. However, as colorectal cancer can develop from a non-inflammatory bowel disease origin and because the microbial mechanisms are not identical, clinical studies investigating this phenomenon in colorectal cancer are required to fully unravel the potential adverse outcomes of oral iron therapy [138].

6. Molecular Pathological Epidemiology in Colorectal Cancer

Along with iron, many other nutritional factors are associated with colorectal cancer, with studies on iron and microbiota having the potential to be confounded by other dietary components. This suggests the need for widescale studies to investigate the interrelationships between environmental exposure such as diet and nutrition, microbiota, and genetics. These factors can be addressed in relation to microbial pathologies and clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer through molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE) [139]. Modifications of the microbiota may not only be a cause of neoplasia but may act as an informative biomarker. Hence, MPE can be utilized to identify probable biomarkers to indicate the potential outcomes of nutritional exposures, such as dietary patterns and medications, on disease outcomes. Along with this, unraveling the complex interplay between diet, microbe, and host may provide the potential for therapeutic intervention through dietary alteration and probiotic bacterial supplementation [140].
Initial MPE studies have investigated the complex relationships between diet, microbiota, and colorectal cancer, assessing potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis and probiotic bacteria genera such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. A prudent diet pattern rich in fish, poultry, fruit, vegetables, and whole grains has been shown to be associated with a lower risk for Fusobacterium nucleatum-positive colorectal cancer, but not Fusobacterium nucleatum-negative cancer [141], whereas an inflammatory dietary pattern rich in red and processed meat, sugar, and refined grains is linked with a higher risk of Fusobacterium nucleatum-positive colorectal cancers, but not with a risk in Fusobacterium nucleatum-negative cancers [142], suggesting that a prudent diet can decrease the risk of colorectal cancer, as well as the fact that nutritional status can regulate the microbiota in order to support colorectal cancer [140]. Likewise, long-term consumption of a diet rich in red meat and fats have been shown to increase the proportion of Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli within the gut microbiota. An increase in these potentially pathogenic bacteria in response to red meat and high-fat diet leads to an increased risk of colorectal cancer, through contributing to barrier dysfunction, inducing inflammation, and promoting carcinogenic pathways [143]. A study by Kellingray et al. assessed the outcomes of diet on the abundance of sulfate-reducing bacteria. They found that a diet rich in Brassica vegetables, such as cabbages, kale, and cauliflower, was associated with a reduction in hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria. The authors suggest that a diet rich in Brassica vegetables can potentially be beneficial to gastrointestinal health through limiting the production of hydrogen sulfide, which can contribute to a reduction in the incidence and progression of cancer [144]. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are both probiotic genera of bacteria that possess anti-cancer properties through the production of SCFAs. Both genera of bacteria are increased in response to a high-fiber diet and can act to reduce inflammation and lower the risk of colorectal cancer [143,145]. As these bacteria have potential anti-cancer properties, they have been suggested as a potential probiotic therapy following surgery for colorectal cancer. This has been assessed in a study by Zaharuddin et al., which involved a probiotic consisting of six viable Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus bacteria given orally twice daily for 6 months. The probiotics were able to modify the intestinal microbiota, leading to a reduction in systemic proinflammatory cytokines following treatment [146]. Future MPE research in the context of nutrition and microbiota is required to investigate the potential outcomes of iron, both dietary and supplementary, on bacterial populations in colorectal cancer, and the potential this has to alter clinical outcomes in these patients.

7. Conclusions

The bacteria that make up a healthy colonic microbiota act to maintain homeostasis and should elicit a tolerogenic response. However, dysbiosis can cause an increase in pathogenic bacteria at the expense of protective bacteria, which can contribute to both colitis and cancer. Pathobionts can contribute to disease through compromising the intestinal wall integrity, inducing inflammation, contributing to oncogenic signaling, and producing carcinogenic products such as hydrogen sulfide, secondary bile acids, and bacterial toxins, whereas symbionts can limit inflammation and inhibit tumor cell growth through the production of butyrate, inactivating carcinogenic compounds, and binding free iron to their surface to limit pathogenic bacterial growth. Nearly all bacteria require iron for growth and survival, however, many pathogenic bacteria have highly specialized iron-acquiring mechanisms that aid in their virulence. This has been supported in studies showing that higher luminal iron concentration leads to a greater abundance of pathogenic bacteria, while a decrease in gut iron hinders pathogenic bacterial growth and favors protective bacterial species. As colonic luminal iron concentration may induce alterations in the composition of the microbiota, any factor that will influence iron intake needs to be controlled in patients with pre-existing dysbiosis, such as in patients with colorectal cancer. As patients with colorectal cancer often present with iron deficiency anemia, it may be more prudent to replenish iron stores parenterally rather than enterally so as to not contribute to the luminal iron concentration available for pathogenic bacteria. As the passenger bacterial population in colorectal cancer can either be protective or pathogenic, increased iron availability may support the induction of pathogenic bacteria that may support tumor progression over protective passenger bacteria that may hinder disease progression. This has been supported in murine studies showing that oral iron induces colonic microbial dysbiosis and exacerbates intestinal disease. For this to be translated into the clinical context, clinical trials investigating iron therapy on microbial populations in colorectal cancer patients are required, as the potential microbial outcomes and disease progression associated with iron supplementation may lead to an alteration in the administration route of iron therapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.P., H.O.A.-H., M.J.B.; writing—original draft, O.P.; writing—review and editing, H.O.A.-H., M.N.Q., A.K., M.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

M.J.B.’s research department has received grant support from Tillots Pharma and Vifor Pharma (Switzerland). M.J.B. has received honoraria and travel support for consulting or lecturing from Vifor Pharma, Tillots Pharma, and Abbvie. The funders had no role in the writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Kosumi, K.; Mima, K.; Baba, H.; Ogino, S. Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer: The Key Target of Molecular Pathological Epidemiology. J. Lab. Precis. Med. 2018, 3, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. DeGruttola, A.K.; Low, D.; Mizoguchi, A.; Mizoguchi, E. Current Understanding of Dysbiosis in Disease in Human and Animal Models. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Terzić, J.; Grivennikov, S.; Karin, E.; Karin, M. Inflammation and Colon Cancer. Gastroenterology 2010, 138, 2101–2114.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thursby, E.; Juge, N. Introduction to the Human Gut Microbiota. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1823–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seiwert, N.; Heylmann, D.; Hasselwander, S.; Fahrer, J. Mechanism of Colorectal Carcinogenesis Triggered by Heme Iron from Red Meat. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2020, 1873, 188334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wooldridge, K.G.; Williams, P.H. Iron Uptake Mechanisms of Pathogenic Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 12, 325–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahalhal, A.; Williams, J.M.; Johnson, S.; Ellaby, N.; Duckworth, C.A.; Burkitt, M.D.; Liu, X.; Hold, G.L.; Campbell, B.J.; Pritchard, D.M.; et al. Oral Iron Exacerbates Colitis and Influences the Intestinal Microbiome. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wilson, M.; Dekker, J.W.; Harlaar, J.; Jeekel, H.; Schipperus, M.; Zwaginga, J. The Role of Preoperative Iron Deficiency in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Prevalence and Treatment. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. Clin. Mol. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2017, 32, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yilmaz, B.; Li, H. Gut Microbiota and Iron: The Crucial Actors in Health and Disease. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2018, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Skaar, E.P. The Battle for Iron between Bacterial Pathogens and their Vertebrate Hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kortman, G.A.M.; Boleij, A.; Swinkels, D.W.; Tjalsma, H. Iron Availability Increases the Pathogenic Potential of Salmonella Typhimurium and Other Enteric Pathogens at the Intestinal Epithelial Interface. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jaeggi, T.; Kortman, G.A.M.; Moretti, D.; Chassard, C.; Holding, P.; Dostal, A.; Boekhorst, J.; Timmerman, H.M.; Swinkels, D.W.; Tjalsma, H.; et al. Iron Fortification Adversely Affects the Gut Microbiome, Increases Pathogen Abundance and Induces Intestinal Inflammation in Kenyan Infants. Gut 2015, 64, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sjödin, K.S.; Domellöf, M.; Lagerqvist, C.; Hernell, O.; Lönnerdal, B.; Szymlek-Gay, E.A.; Sjödin, A.; West, C.E.; Lind, T. Administration of Ferrous Sulfate Drops has Significant Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Iron-Sufficient Infants: A Randomised Controlled Study. Gut 2019, 68, 2095–2097. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruan, W.; Engevik, M.A.; Spinler, J.K.; Versalovic, J. Healthy Human Gastrointestinal Microbiome: Composition and Function after a Decade of Exploration. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Pickard, J.M.; Zeng, M.Y.; Caruso, R.; Núñez, G. Gut Microbiota: Role in Pathogen Colonization, Immune Responses and Inflammatory Disease. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 279, 70–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gorbach, S.L. Microbiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. In Medical Microbiology, 4th ed.; Baron, S., Ed.; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: Galveston, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamada, N.; Chen, G.Y.; Inohara, N.; Núñez, G. Control of Pathogens and Pathobionts by the Gut Microbiota. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Illiano, P.; Brambilla, R.; Parolini, C. The Mutual Interplay of Gut Microbiota, Diet and Human Disease. FEBS J. 2020, 287, 833–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Burns, M.B.; Blekhman, R. Integrating Tumor Genomics into Studies of the Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer. Gut Microbes 2018, 10, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Burns, M.B.; Montassier, E.; Abrahante, J.; Priya, S.; Niccum, D.E.; Khoruts, A.; Starr, T.K.; Knights, D.; Blekhman, R. Colorectal Cancer Mutational Profiles Correlate with Defined Microbial Communities in the Tumor Microenvironment. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Whisner, C.M.; Athena Aktipis, C. The Role of the Microbiome in Cancer Initiation and Progression: How Microbes and Cancer Cells Utilize Excess Energy and Promote One another’s Growth. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2019, 8, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Parsonnet, J. Bacterial Infection as a Cause of Cancer. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995, 103 (Suppl. 8), 263–268. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wroblewski, L.E.; Peek, R.M., Jr.; Wilson, K.T. Helicobacter Pylori and Gastric Cancer: Factors that Modulate Disease Risk. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 713–739. [Google Scholar]
  24. Maeda, S.; Mentis, A.F. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection. Helicobacter 2007, 12, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khatoon, J.; Rai, R.P.; Prasad, K.N. Role of Helicobacter Pylori in Gastric Cancer: Updates. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2016, 8, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kusters, J.G.; van Vliet, A.H.; Kuipers, E.J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 449–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Teimoorian, F.; Ranaei, M.; Hajian Tilaki, K.; Shokri Shirvani, J.; Vosough, Z. Association of Helicobacter Pylori Infection with Colon Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps. Iran. J. Pathol. 2018, 13, 325–332. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bauer, B.; Meyer, T.F. The Human Gastric Pathogen Helicobacter Pylori and its Association with Gastric Cancer and Ulcer Disease. Ulcers 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, T.C.; Fox, J.G. Helicobacter Pylori and Gastric Cancer: Koch’s Postulates Fulfilled? Gastroenterology 1998, 115, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Akin, H.; Tözün, N. Diet, Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2014, 48 (Suppl. 1), 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brennan, C.A.; Garrett, W.S. Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Colorectal Cancer. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 70, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nelson, H.; Chia, N. Gut Microbiome and Colon Cancer: A Plausible Explanation for Dietary Contributions to Cancer. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2019, 229, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sun, J.; Kato, I. Gut Microbiota, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer. Genes Dis. 2016, 3, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tjalsma, H.; Boleij, A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Dutilh, B.E. A Bacterial Driver-Passenger Model for Colorectal Cancer: Beyond the Usual Suspects. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Uronis, J.M.; Mühlbauer, M.; Herfarth, H.H.; Rubinas, T.C.; Jones, G.S.; Jobin, C. Modulation of the Intestinal Microbiota Alters Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Xue, X.; Shah, Y.M. Intestinal Iron Homeostasis and Colon Tumorigenesis. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2333–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Campisciano, G.; de Manzini, N.; Delbue, S.; Cason, C.; Cosola, D.; Basile, G.; Ferrante, P.; Comar, M.; Palmisano, S. The Obesity-Related Gut Bacterial and Viral Dysbiosis can Impact the Risk of Colon Cancer Development. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Park, C.H.; Eun, C.S.; Han, D.S. Intestinal Microbiota, Chronic Inflammation, and Colorectal Cancer. Intest. Res. 2018, 16, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, T.; Cai, G.; Qiu, Y.; Fei, N.; Zhang, M.; Pang, X.; Jia, W.; Cai, S.; Zhao, L. Structural Segregation of Gut Microbiota between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers. ISME J. 2011, 6, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lin, C.; Cai, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Sheng, Q.; Hua, H.; Zhou, X. Role of Gut Microbiota in the Development and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Digestion 2019, 100, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weir, T.L.; Manter, D.K.; Sheflin, A.M.; Barnett, B.A.; Heuberger, A.L.; Ryan, E.P. Stool Microbiome and Metabolome Differences between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Adults. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lasry, A.; Zinger, A.; Ben-Neriah, Y. Inflammatory Networks Underlying Colorectal Cancer. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Klampfer, L. Cytokines, Inflammation and Colon Cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug. Targets 2011, 11, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ridlon, J.M.; Kang, D.; Hylemon, P.B. Bile Salt Biotransformations by Human Intestinal Bacteria. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 47, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Fiorucci, S.; Distrutti, E. Bile Acid-Activated Receptors, Intestinal Microbiota, and the Treatment of Metabolic Disorders. Trends Mol. Med. 2015, 21, 702–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rossocha, M.; Schultz-Heienbrok, R.; von Moeller, H.; Coleman, J.P.; Saenger, W. Conjugated Bile Acid Hydrolase is a Tetrameric N-Terminal Thiol Hydrolase with Specific Recognition of its Cholyl but Not of its Tauryl Product. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 5739–5748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gérard, P. Metabolism of Cholesterol and Bile Acids by the Gut Microbiota. Pathogens 2013, 3, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jones, B.V.; Begley, M.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C.G.M.; Marchesi, J.R. Functional and Comparative Metagenomic Analysis of Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity in the Human Gut Microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13580–13585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Liu, T.; Song, X.; Khan, S.; Li, Y.; Guo, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, S.; Dong, W.; Liu, W.; Wang, B.; et al. The Gut Microbiota at the Intersection of Bile Acids and Intestinal Carcinogenesis: An Old Story, Yet Mesmerizing. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 1780–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zeng, H.; Umar, S.; Rust, B.; Lazarova, D.; Bordonaro, M. Secondary Bile Acids and Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon: A Focus on Colonic Microbiome, Cell Proliferation, Inflammation, and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nguyen, T.T.; Ung, T.T.; Kim, N.H.; Jung, Y.D. Role of Bile Acids in Colon Carcinogenesis. World J. Clin. Cases 2018, 6, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bernstein, H.; Bernstein, C.; Payne, C.M.; Dvorakova, K.; Garewal, H. Bile Acids as Carcinogens in Human Gastrointestinal Cancers. Mutat. Res. 2005, 589, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. de Kok, T.M.; van Faassen, A.; Glinghammar, B.; Pachen, D.M.; Eng, M.; Rafter, J.J.; Baeten, C.G.; Engels, L.G.; Kleinjans, J.C. Bile Acid Concentrations, Cytotoxicity, and pH of Fecal Water from Patients with Colorectal Adenomas. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1999, 44, 2218–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. O’Keefe, S.J.D.; Li, J.V.; Lahti, L.; Ou, J.; Carbonero, F.; Mohammed, K.; Posma, J.M.; Kinross, J.; Wahl, E.; Ruder, E.; et al. Fat, Fibre and Cancer Risk in African Americans and Rural Africans. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Molinero, N.; Ruiz, L.; Sánchez, B.; Margolles, A.; Delgado, S. Intestinal Bacteria Interplay with Bile and Cholesterol Metabolism: Implications on Host Physiology. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Nagengast, F.M.; Grubben, M.J.; van Munster, I.P. Role of Bile Acids in Colorectal Carcinogenesis. Eur. J. Cancer 1995, 31A, 1067–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Dahmus, J.D.; Kotler, D.L.; Kastenberg, D.M.; Kistler, C.A. The Gut Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Bacterial Pathogenesis. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2018, 9, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Attene-Ramos, M.S.; Wagner, E.D.; Plewa, M.J.; Gaskins, H.R. Evidence that Hydrogen Sulfide is a Genotoxic Agent. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chen, Z.; Ai, L.; Wang, J.; Ren, L.; Yu, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.; Yu, J.; Li, M.; Qin, W.; et al. Probiotics Clostridium Butyricum and Bacillus Subtilis Ameliorate Intestinal Tumorigenesis. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1433–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shang, F.; Liu, H. Fusobacterium Nucleatum and Colorectal Cancer: A Review. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2018, 10, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rubinstein, M.R.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Hao, Y.; Cai, G.; Han, Y.W. Fusobacterium Nucleatum Promotes Colorectal Carcinogenesis by Modulating E-Cadherin/Β-Catenin Signaling Via its FadA Adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Kunzmann, A.T.; Proença, M.A.; Jordao, H.W.; Jiraskova, K.; Schneiderova, M.; Levy, M.; Liska, V.; Buchler, T.; Vodickova, L.; Vymetalkova, V.; et al. Fusobacterium Nucleatum Tumor DNA Levels are Associated with Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 1891–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ke, Y.; Li, Y. Prognostic Impact of the Fusobacterium Nucleatum Status in Colorectal Cancers. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019, 98, e17221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cuevas-Ramos, G.; Petit, C.R.; Marcq, I.; Boury, M.; Oswald, E.; Nougayrède, J. Escherichia Coli Induces DNA Damage in Vivo and Triggers Genomic Instability in Mammalian Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11537–11542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Dubinsky, V.; Dotan, I.; Gophna, U. Carriage of Colibactin-Producing Bacteria and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Trends Microbiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Faïs, T.; Delmas, J.; Barnich, N.; Bonnet, R.; Dalmasso, G. Colibactin: More than a New Bacterial Toxin. Toxins (Basel) 2018, 10, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Arthur, J.C.; Perez-Chanona, E.; Mühlbauer, M.; Tomkovich, S.; Uronis, J.M.; Fan, T.; Campbell, B.J.; Abujamel, T.; Dogan, B.; Rogers, A.B.; et al. Intestinal Inflammation Targets Cancer-Inducing Activity of the Microbiota. Science 2012, 338, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Boleij, A.; Hechenbleikner, E.M.; Goodwin, A.C.; Badani, R.; Stein, E.M.; Lazarev, M.G.; Ellis, B.; Carroll, K.C.; Albesiano, E.; Wick, E.C.; et al. The Bacteroides Fragilis Toxin Gene is Prevalent in the Colon Mucosa of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 60, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Haghi, F.; Goli, E.; Mirzaei, B.; Zeighami, H. The Association between Fecal Enterotoxigenic B. Fragilis with Colorectal Cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Purcell, R.V.; Pearson, J.; Aitchison, A.; Dixon, L.; Frizelle, F.A.; Keenan, J.I. Colonization with Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides Fragilis is Associated with Early-Stage Colorectal Neoplasia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wei, Z.; Cao, S.; Liu, S.; Yao, Z.; Sun, T.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, Y. Could Gut Microbiota Serve as Prognostic Biomarker Associated with Colorectal Cancer Patients’ Survival? A Pilot Study on Relevant Mechanism. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 46158–46172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Bahmani, S.; Azarpira, N.; Moazamian, E. Anti-Colon Cancer Activity of Bifidobacterium Metabolites on Colon Cancer Cell Line SW742. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 30, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, S.W.; Kim, H.M.; Yang, K.M.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.; An, M.J.; Park, J.J.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, T.I.; Kim, W.H.; et al. Bifidobacterium Lactis Inhibits NF-kappaB in Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Prevents Acute Colitis and Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer in Mice. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 1514–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Singh, J.; Rivenson, A.; Tomita, M.; Shimamura, S.; Ishibashi, N.; Reddy, B.S. Bifidobacterium Longum, a Lactic Acid-Producing Intestinal Bacterium Inhibits Colon Cancer and Modulates the Intermediate Biomarkers of Colon Carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 1997, 18, 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kot, E.; Bezkorovainy, A. Binding of Ferric Iron to the Cell Walls and Membranes of Bifidobacterium Thermophilum:  Effect of Free Radicals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4606–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Casanova, M.R.; Azevedo-Silva, J.; Rodrigues, L.R.; Preto, A. Colorectal Cancer Cells Increase the Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids by Propionibacterium Freudenreichii Impacting on Cancer Cells Survival. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wu, S.; Morin, P.J.; Maouyo, D.; Sears, C.L. Bacteroides Fragilis Enterotoxin Induces C-Myc Expression and Cellular Proliferation. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, S.; Rhee, K.; Albesiano, E.; Rabizadeh, S.; Wu, X.; Yen, H.; Huso, D.L.; Brancati, F.L.; Wick, E.; McAllister, F.; et al. A Human Colonic Commensal Promotes Colon Tumorigenesis Via Activation of T Helper Type 17 T Cell Responses. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Feng, Q.; Liang, S.; Jia, H.; Stadlmayr, A.; Tang, L.; Lan, Z.; Zhang, D.; Xia, H.; Xu, X.; Jie, Z.; et al. Gut Microbiome Development Along the Colorectal Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Yang, Y.; Jobin, C. Novel Insights into Microbiome in Colitis and Colorectal Cancer. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2017, 33, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jahani-Sherafat, S.; Alebouyeh, M.; Moghim, S.; Ahmadi Amoli, H.; Ghasemian-Safaei, H. Role of Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer; a Review Article. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2018, 11, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ewaschuk, J.B.; Walker, J.W.; Diaz, H.; Madsen, K.L. Bioproduction of Conjugated Linoleic Acid by Probiotic Bacteria Occurs in Vitro and in Vivo in Mice. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1483–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Abdulamir, A.S.; Hafidh, R.R.; Abu Bakar, F. The Association of Streptococcus Bovis/Gallolyticus with Colorectal Tumors: The Nature and the Underlying Mechanisms of its Etiological Role. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 30, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Kannen, V.; Parry, L.; Martin, F.L. Phages Enter the Fight against Colorectal Cancer. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 577–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gonçalves, P.; Martel, F. Butyrate and Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Butyrate Transport. Curr. Drug Metab. 2013, 14, 994–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Duncan, S.H.; Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Lactate-Utilizing Bacteria, Isolated from Human Feces, that Produce Butyrate as a Major Fermentation Product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5810–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Tsoi, H.; Chu, E.S.H.; Zhang, X.; Sheng, J.; Nakatsu, G.; Ng, S.C.; Chan, A.W.H.; Chan, F.K.L.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Yu, J. Peptostreptococcus Anaerobius Induces Intracellular Cholesterol Biosynthesis in Colon Cells to Induce Proliferation and Causes Dysplasia in Mice. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1419–1433.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Balamurugan, R.; Rajendiran, E.; George, S.; Samuel, G.V.; Ramakrishna, B.S. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Quantification of Specific Butyrate-Producing Bacteria, Desulfovibrio and Enterococcus Faecalis in the Feces of Patients with Colorectal Cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 23, 1298–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sokol, H.; Pigneur, B.; Watterlot, L.; Lakhdari, O.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Gratadoux, J.; Blugeon, S.; Bridonneau, C.; Furet, J.; Corthier, G.; et al. Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii is an Anti-Inflammatory Commensal Bacterium Identified by Gut Microbiota Analysis of Crohn Disease Patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16731–16736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Tian, Y.; Wang, K.; Ji, G. Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii Prevents Tumorigenesis in a Model of Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, S354–S355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gur, C.; Ibrahim, Y.; Isaacson, B.; Yamin, R.; Abed, J.; Gamliel, M.; Enk, J.; Bar-On, Y.; Stanietsky-Kaynan, N.; Coppenhagen-Glazer, S.; et al. Binding of the Fap2 Protein of Fusobacterium Nucleatum to Human Inhibitory Receptor TIGIT Protects Tumors from Immune Cell Attack. Immunity 2015, 42, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tilg, H.; Adolph, T.E.; Gerner, R.R.; Moschen, A.R. The Intestinal Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 954–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Dalmasso, G.; Cougnoux, A.; Delmas, J.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Bonnet, R. The Bacterial Genotoxin Colibactin Promotes Colon Tumor Growth by Modifying the Tumor Microenvironment. Gut Microbes 2014, 5, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C.; Puschhof, J.; Huber, A.R.; van Hoeck, A.; Wood, H.M.; Nomburg, J.; Gurjao, C.; Manders, F.; Dalmasso, G.; Stege, P.B.; et al. Mutational Signature in Colorectal Cancer Caused by Genotoxic Pks + E. Coli. Nature 2020, 580, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lu, R.; Bosland, M.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kato, I.; Sun, J. Presence of Salmonella AvrA in Colorectal Tumor and its Precursor Lesions in Mouse Intestine and Human Specimens. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 55104–55115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Wu, S.; Ye, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, Y.; Steiner, A.; Petrof, E.O.; Claud, E.C.; Sun, J. Salmonella Typhimurium Infection Increases p53 Acetylation in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 298, G784–G794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Mira-Pascual, L.; Cabrera-Rubio, R.; Ocon, S.; Costales, P.; Parra, A.; Suarez, A.; Moris, F.; Rodrigo, L.; Mira, A.; Collado, M.C. Microbial Mucosal Colonic Shifts Associated with the Development of Colorectal Cancer Reveal the Presence of Different Bacterial and Archaeal Biomarkers. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 50, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ng, O. Iron, Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2016, 166, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Orrhage, K.M.; Annas, A.; Nord, C.E.; Brittebo, E.B.; Rafter, J.J. Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Uptake and Distribution of the Food Mutagen Trp-P-2 in Mice. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 37, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, X.; Wu, Y.; He, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Effects of the Intestinal Microbial Metabolite Butyrate on the Development of Colorectal Cancer. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 2510–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rivière, A.; Selak, M.; Lantin, D.; Leroy, F.; De Vuyst, L. Bifidobacteria and Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria: Importance and Strategies for their Stimulation in the Human Gut. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Lærke, H.N.; Hedemann, M.S.; Nielsen, T.S.; Ingerslev, A.K.; Gundelund Nielsen, D.S.; Theil, P.K.; Purup, S.; Hald, S.; Schioldan, A.G.; et al. Impact of Diet-Modulated Butyrate Production on Intestinal Barrier Function and Inflammation. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Han, A.; Bennett, N.; Ahmed, B.; Whelan, J.; Donohoe, D.R. Butyrate Decreases its Own Oxidation in Colorectal Cancer Cells through Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 27280–27292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Chen, J.; Vitetta, L. Inflammation-Modulating Effect of Butyrate in the Prevention of Colon Cancer by Dietary Fiber. Clin. Colorectal Cancer 2018, 17, e541–e544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Saus, E.; Iraola-Guzmán, S.; Willis, J.R.; Brunet-Vega, A.; Gabaldón, T. Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer: Roles in Carcinogenesis and Clinical Potential. Mol. Aspects Med. 2019, 69, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Donohoe, D.R.; Holley, D.; Collins, L.B.; Montgomery, S.A.; Whitmore, A.C.; Hillhouse, A.; Curry, K.P.; Renner, S.W.; Greenwalt, A.; Ryan, E.P.; et al. A Gnotobiotic Mouse Model Demonstrates that Dietary Fiber Protects Against Colorectal Tumorigenesis in a Microbiota- and Butyrate-Dependent Manner. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 1387–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Dai, Z.; Coker, O.O.; Nakatsu, G.; Wu, W.K.K.; Zhao, L.; Chen, Z.; Chan, F.K.L.; Kristiansen, K.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Wong, S.H.; et al. Multi-Cohort Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Metagenome Identified Altered Bacteria Across Populations and Universal Bacterial Markers. Microbiome 2018, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dong, T.S.; Gupta, A. Influence of Early Life, Diet, and the Environment on the Microbiome. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Song, M.; Chan, A.T. Environmental Factors, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Huang, C.; Shi, G. Smoking and Microbiome in Oral, Airway, Gut and some Systemic Diseases. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Li, R.; Grimm, S.A.; Mav, D.; Gu, H.; Djukovic, D.; Shah, R.; Merrick, B.A.; Raftery, D.; Wade, P.A. Transcriptome and DNA Methylome Analysis in a Mouse Model of Diet-Induced Obesity Predicts Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Weinberg, E.D. Iron Availability and Infection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 600–605. [Google Scholar]
  113. Sornjai, W.; Nguyen Van Long, F.; Pion, N.; Pasquer, A.; Saurin, J.; Marcel, V.; Diaz, J.J.; Mertani, H.C.; Smith, D.R. Iron and Hepcidin Mediate Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2020, 319, 109021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hooda, J.; Shah, A.; Zhang, L. Heme, an Essential Nutrient from Dietary Proteins, Critically Impacts Diverse Physiological and Pathological Processes. Nutrients 2014, 6, 1080–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Amagloh, F.K.; Atuna, R.A.; McBride, R.; Carey, E.E.; Christides, T. Nutrient and Total Polyphenol Contents of Dark Green Leafy Vegetables, and Estimation of their Iron Bioaccessibility using the in Vitro Digestion/Caco-2 Cell Model. Foods 2017, 6, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Parmanand, B.A.; Kellingray, L.; Le Gall, G.; Basit, A.W.; Fairweather-Tait, S.; Narbad, A. A Decrease in Iron Availability to Human Gut Microbiome Reduces the Growth of Potentially Pathogenic Gut Bacteria; an in Vitro Colonic Fermentation Study. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 67, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zimmermann, M.B.; Chassard, C.; Rohner, F.; N’goran, E.K.; Nindjin, C.; Dostal, A.; Utzinger, J.; Ghattas, H.; Lacroix, C.; Hurrell, R.F. The Effects of Iron Fortification on the Gut Microbiota in African Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Cote D’Ivoire. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 1406–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rocha, E.R.; Krykunivsky, A.S. Anaerobic Utilization of Fe(III)-xenosiderophores among Bacteroides Species and the Distinct Assimilation of Fe(III)-ferrichrome by Bacteroides Fragilis within the Genus. Microbiologyopen 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Zafar, H.; Saier, M.H., Jr. Comparative Genomics of Transport Proteins in Seven Bacteroides Species. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Huang, Y.; Chassard, C.; Hausmann, M.; von Itzstein, M.; Hennet, T. Sialic Acid Catabolism Drives Intestinal Inflammation and Microbial Dysbiosis in Mice. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Vivarelli, S.; Salemi, R.; Candido, S.; Falzone, L.; Santagati, M.; Stefani, S.; Torino, F.; Banna, G.L.; Tonini, G.; Libra, M. Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Lee, T.; Clavel, T.; Smirnov, K.; Schmidt, A.; Lagkouvardos, I.; Walker, A.; Lucio, M.; Michalke, B.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Fedorak, R.; et al. Oral Versus Intravenous Iron Replacement Therapy Distinctly Alters the Gut Microbiota and Metabolome in Patients with IBD. Gut 2017, 66, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zarei, O.; Arabestan, M.R.; Majlesi, A.; Mohammadi, Y.; Alikhani, M.Y. Determination of Virulence Determinants of Escherichia Coli Strains Isolated from Patients with Colorectal Cancer Compared to the Healthy Subjects. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2019, 12, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Long, S.; Yang, Y.; Shen, C.; Wang, Y.; Deng, A.; Qin, Q.; Qiao, L. Metaproteomics Characterizes Human Gut Microbiome Function in Colorectal Cancer. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2020, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ellermann, M.; Gharaibeh, R.Z.; Maharshak, N.; Peréz-Chanona, E.; Jobin, C.; Carroll, I.M.; Arthur, J.C.; Plevy, S.E.; Fodor, A.A.; Brouwer, C.R.; et al. Dietary Iron Variably Modulates Assembly of the Intestinal Microbiota in Colitis-Resistant and Colitis-Susceptible Mice. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Wilson, M.J.; Harlaar, J.J.; Jeekel, J.; Schipperus, M.; Zwaginga, J.J. Iron Therapy as Treatment of Anemia: A Potentially Detrimental and Hazardous Strategy in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Med. Hypotheses 2018, 110, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fowler, A.J.; Ahmad, T.; Phull, M.K.; Allard, S.; Gillies, M.A.; Pearse, R.M. Meta-Analysis of the Association between Preoperative Anaemia and Mortality After Surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2015, 102, 1314–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Leichtle, S.W.; Mouawad, N.J.; Lampman, R.; Singal, B.; Cleary, R.K. Does Preoperative Anemia Adversely Affect Colon and Rectal Surgery Outcomes? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011, 212, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Borstlap, W.A.A.; Buskens, C.J.; Tytgat, K.M.A.J.; Tuynman, J.B.; Consten, E.C.J.; Tolboom, R.C.; Heuff, G.; van Geloven, N.; van Wagensveld, B.A.; Wientjes, C.A.C.A.; et al. Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ferric(III)Carboxymaltose Infusion with Oral Iron Supplementation in the Treatment of Preoperative Anaemia in Colorectal Cancer Patients. BMC Surg. 2015, 15, 78. [Google Scholar]
  130. Calleja, J.; Calleja, J.; Delgado, S.; Delgado, S.; del Val, A.; del Val, A.; Hervás, A.; Hervás, A.; Larraona, J.; Larraona, J.; et al. Ferric Carboxymaltose Reduces Transfusions and Hospital Stay in Patients with Colon Cancer and Anemia. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2016, 31, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Constante, M.; Fragoso, G.; Calvé, A.; Samba-Mondonga, M.; Santos, M.M. Dietary Heme Induces Gut Dysbiosis, Aggravates Colitis, and Potentiates the Development of Adenomas in Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Hnatyszyn, A.; Hryhorowicz, S.; Kaczmarek-Ryś, M.; Lis, E.; Słomski, R.; Scott, R.J.; Pławski, A. Colorectal Carcinoma in the Course of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Hered. Cancer Clin. Pract. 2019, 17, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Tulewicz-Marti, E.; Moniuszko, A.; Rydzewska, G. Management of Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Challenge in Everyday Clinical Practice. Prz. Gastroenterol. 2017, 12, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Martín, R.; Miquel, S.; Benevides, L.; Bridonneau, C.; Robert, V.; Hudault, S.; Chain, F.; Berteau, O.; Azevedo, V.; Chatel, J.M.; et al. Functional Characterization of Novel Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii Strains Isolated from Healthy Volunteers: A Step Forward in the use of F. Prausnitzii as a Next-Generation Probiotic. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhou, L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Dorfman, R.G.; Liu, H.; Yu, T.; Chen, X.; Tang, D.; Xu, L.; Yin, Y.; et al. Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii Produces Butyrate to Maintain Th17/Treg Balance and to Ameliorate Colorectal Colitis by Inhibiting Histone Deacetylase 1. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2018, 24, 1926–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Ze, X.; Duncan, S.H.; Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Ruminococcus Bromii is a Keystone Species for the Degradation of Resistant Starch in the Human Colon. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1535–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Golonka, R.M.; Xiao, X.; Abokor, A.A.; Joe, B.; Vijay-Kumar, M. Altered Nutrient Status Reprograms Host Inflammation and Metabolic Health Via Gut Microbiota. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2020, 80, 108360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Danese, S.; Mantovani, A. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Intestinal Cancer: A Paradigm of the Yin-Yang Interplay between Inflammation and Cancer. Oncogene 2010, 29, 3313–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Ogino, S.; Nowak, J.A.; Hamada, T.; Milner, D.A.; Nishihara, R. Insights into Pathogenic Interactions among Environment, Host, and Tumor at the Crossroads of Molecular Pathology and Epidemiology. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2019, 14, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hamada, T.; Nowak, J.A.; Milner, D.A.; Song, M.; Ogino, S. Integration of Microbiology, Molecular Pathology, and Epidemiology: A New Paradigm to Explore the Pathogenesis of Microbiome-Driven Neoplasms. J. Pathol. 2019, 247, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Mehta, R.S.; Nishihara, R.; Cao, Y.; Song, M.; Mima, K.; Qian, Z.R.; Nowak, J.A.; Kosumi, K.; Hamada, T.; Masugi, Y.; et al. Dietary Patterns and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Subtypes Classified by Fusobacterium Nucleatum in Tumor Tissue. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Liu, L.; Tabung, F.K.; Zhang, X.; Nowak, J.A.; Qian, Z.R.; Hamada, T.; Nevo, D.; Bullman, S.; Mima, K.; Kosumi, K.; et al. Diets that Promote Colon Inflammation Associate with Risk of Colorectal Carcinomas that Contain Fusobacterium Nucleatum. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 16, 1622–1631.e3. [Google Scholar]
  143. Huang, P.; Liu, Y. A Reasonable Diet Promotes Balance of Intestinal Microbiota: Prevention of Precolorectal Cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Kellingray, L.; Tapp, H.S.; Saha, S.; Doleman, J.F.; Narbad, A.; Mithen, R.F. Consumption of a Diet Rich in Brassica Vegetables is Associated with a Reduced Abundance of Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria: A Randomised Crossover Study. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Eslami, M.; Yousefi, B.; Kokhaei, P.; Hemati, M.; Nejad, Z.R.; Arabkari, V.; Namdar, A. Importance of Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 17127–17143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zaharuddin, L.; Mokhtar, N.; Muhammad Nawawi, K.N.; Raja Ali, R.A. A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Probiotics in Post-Surgical Colorectal Cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 12 02512 g001 550
Figure 1. Protective and pathogenic bacterial species and microbial pathways involved in colorectal cancer. The three major microbially induced pathways that contribute to colorectal cancer are inflammation, oncogenic signaling, and carcinogenic toxin and metabolite production. Symbionts (green) inhibit these pathways and pathobionts (red) promote these pathways.
Figure 1. Protective and pathogenic bacterial species and microbial pathways involved in colorectal cancer. The three major microbially induced pathways that contribute to colorectal cancer are inflammation, oncogenic signaling, and carcinogenic toxin and metabolite production. Symbionts (green) inhibit these pathways and pathobionts (red) promote these pathways.
Nutrients 12 02512 g001
Table
Table 1. Potential mechanisms of symbionts and pathobionts in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.
Table 1. Potential mechanisms of symbionts and pathobionts in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.
PhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusSpeciesSymbiont or Pathobiont Potential Mechanism
ActinobacteriaActinobacteriaBifidobacterialesBifidobacteriaceaeBifidobacteriumBifidobacterium bifidumSymbiontProduces metabolites that can inhibit colorectal cancer cell growth [72].
Bifidobacterium lactisSymbiontInhibits NF-κB signaling, limiting colitis-associated colorectal cancer [73].
Bifidobacterium longumSymbiontLactic acid-producing bacteria that inhibits colorectal tumor cell proliferation through modulation of MAP kinase oncogenic pathway [74].
Bifidobacterium thermophilumSymbiontBinds free iron, reducing iron for pathogenic bacteria and reactive oxygen species production [75].
PropionibacterialesPropionibacteriaceaePropionibacteriumPropionibacterium freudenreichiiSymbiontExerts a protective effect against colorectal cancer through the production of short-chain fatty acids, acetate, and propionate [76].
BacteroidetesBacteroidiaBacteroidalesBacteroidaceaeBacteroidesEnterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilisPathobiontDegrades E-cadherin and activates beta-catenin signaling, upregulating c-Myc expression and contributing to colonic cellular proliferation [77].
Secretes B. fragilis toxin that can induce STAT3 signaling [78].
Bacteroides vulgatusPathobiontInvolved in the hydrolysis of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids, which is associated with colitis and oncogenic signaling [49,79]. Correlated with systemic inflammation and colorectal cancer tumor stage [79].
RikenellaceaeAlistipesAlistipes finegoldiiPathobiontLinked to colitis-associated colorectal cancer; in vivo studies have shown to be through activation of IL-6/STAT3 signaling [80].
FirmicutesBacilliLactobacillalesEnterococcaceaeEnterococcusEnterococcus faecalisPathobiontCan produce reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that can contribute to DNA damage and colonic inflammation [81].
LactobacillaceaeLactobacillusLactobacillus acidophilusSymbiontCan produce conjugated linoleic acids from linoleic acid. Fatty acids produced by these species act on colonocytes, possessing antiproliferative and proapoptotic mechanisms [82].
Lactobacillus casei
Lactobacillus delbrueckii
Lactobacillus plantarum
StreptococcaceaeStreptococcusStreptococcus bovis/gallolyticusPathobiontCan induce production of cytokines that lead to free radical production, colonic inflammation, and increased angiogenesis. Contributes to pro-proliferative signaling via MAP kinase and COX-2/prostaglandin induced cellular proliferation and inhibited apoptosis [83].
BacillalesBacillaceaeBacillusBacillus subtilisSymbiontProbiotic bacteria that can inhibit the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells, induces cell cycle arrest, and promotes apoptosis. Shown to reduce inflammation and aids in immune homeostasis [59].
ClostridiaClostridialesClostridiaceaeClostridiumClostridium butyricumSymbiontProduces butyrate, which possesses anticancer properties, inducing cell differentiation and apoptosis, as well as inhibiting cellular proliferation [84,85].
LachnospiraceaeEubacteriumEubacterium rectaleSymbiontAnti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria [86].
RoseburiaRoseburia intestinalis
PeptostreptococcaceaePeptostreptococcusPeptostreptococcus anaerobiusPathobiontHas been shown to interact with Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 on colonic cells. Elevating levels of reactive oxygen species, promoting cell proliferation and increasing colonic dysplasia [87].
RuminococcaceaeFaecalibacteriumFaecalibacterium prausnitziiSymbiontButyrate-producing bacteria, shown to be anti-inflammatory and able to inhibit colorectal tumorigenesis [88,89,90].
FusobacteriaFusobacteriiaFusobacterialesFusobacteriaceaeFusobacteriumFusobacterium nucleatumPathobiontFadA medicated activation of beta-catenin can contribute to inflammatory and oncogenic signaling [61]. Fap2 protein present on F. nucleatum binds to TIGIT on the antitumor immune cells, natural killer cells, and T-cells, which can limit tumor immunosurveillance [91].
ProteobacteriaDeltaproteobacteriaDesulfovibrionalesDesulfovibrionaceaeBilophilaBilophila wadsworthiaPathobiontProinflammatory sulfate-reducing bacteria capable of producing genotoxic hydrogen sulfide [92].
GammaproteobacteriaEnterobacteralesEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichiaEscherichia coli (harboring pks pathogenicity islands)PathobiontProduces the bacterial genotoxin colibactin that promotes the growth of colonic tumor cells. Colibactin induces DNA interstrand crosslinks and double-strand breaks [93,94].
SalmonellaSalmonella typhimuriumPathobiontProduces the bacterial protein AvrA, which is associated with inflammation and colorectal cancer, through modulation of the p53 pathway [95,96].
VerrucomicrobiaVerrucomicrobiae VerrucomicrobialesAkkermansiaceaeAkkermansiaAkkermansia muciniphilaPathobiontA mucin-degrading bacterium that contributes to colonic inflammation [97].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Phipps, O.; Al-Hassi, H.O.; Quraishi, M.N.; Kumar, A.; Brookes, M.J. Influence of Iron on the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2512. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092512

AMA Style

Phipps O, Al-Hassi HO, Quraishi MN, Kumar A, Brookes MJ. Influence of Iron on the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients. 2020; 12(9):2512. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092512

Chicago/Turabian Style

Phipps, Oliver, Hafid O. Al-Hassi, Mohammed N. Quraishi, Aditi Kumar, and Matthew J. Brookes. 2020. "Influence of Iron on the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer" Nutrients 12, no. 9: 2512. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092512

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop