Effects of Euglena gracilis Intake on Mood and Autonomic Activity under Mental Workload, and Subjective Sleep Quality: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
1
Euglena Co. Ltd., Tokyo 108-0014, Japan
2
Miura Clinic, Medical Corporation Kanonkai, Osaka 530-0044, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(11), 3243; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113243
Submission received: 23 August 2020
/
Revised: 18 October 2020
/
Accepted: 20 October 2020
/
Published: 23 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Research in Dietary Supplements and Healthy Foods)
Abstract
:While the human body maintains homeostasis by altering the balance in the autonomic nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, a prolonged imbalance in these systems can result in physical and mental symptoms, including a decline in sleep quality and work efficiency. Euglena gracilis (Euglena) is a single-celled microalga with the properties of both plants and animals and contains abundant nutrients, such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids, which have various beneficial health effects. This study evaluated the effects of Euglena intake on the mood states and stress coping under mental workload tasks, and subjective sleep quality. We assigned men and women aged 20 to 64 years to Euglena and placebo intake groups, and measured indices related to the autonomic nervous system, psychological states, and sleep quality together with the application of workload stress before food intake, and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after commencing intake. Euglena intake regulated the autonomic nervous system under a workload and improved psychological parameters and sleep conditions. These results indicate that the consumption of Euglena may regulate the balance of the autonomic nervous system during stress and may have a favorable effect on psychological status and sleep quality.
1. Introduction
Stress is a general term for the defense response to external stimuli, such as pain, cold, and infection, and can include mental tension and worry [1]. Recently, there has been considerable interest in the effects of psychological stress on the body, particularly in light of the discovery of a neural pathway that transmits stress signals from specific areas of the cerebral cortex, which processes psychological stress and emotions, to the hypothalamus, which controls the sympathetic nervous system [2]. The human body is constantly exposed to stress and works to maintain a constant internal environment via the control of the autonomic nervous, endocrine, and immune systems for protection [3]. However, excessive stress weakens the body’s stress resistance, resulting in physical and psychological symptoms, including a deterioration in the quality of sleep and reduced work efficiency [4].
The autonomic nervous system, which includes the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, plays several important roles in the regulation of biological functions, such as respiration/circulation, digestion/absorption, secretion, and metabolism in a coordinated manner to maintain homeostasis [5]. For example, an imbalance in the autonomic nervous system may prevent the activation of the sympathetic nervous system, even during activities when it is typically activated, or the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, even during recovery and rest. These conditions lead to an inability to concentrate and various ailments, such as poor sleep quality, reduced immunity, poor bowel movements, as well as various diseases [5]. Eliminating the underlying stress is an effective approach to balancing the autonomic nervous system. However, adjustments in lifestyle and nutrition are also effective.
Euglena gracilis (Euglena) is a single-celled microalga with plant and animal properties. Euglena consists of various nutrients, such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids, and are used as nutritional and general supplements [6]. Previous studies have confirmed that Euglena intake effectively suppresses elevated blood glucose levels [7], suppresses fat accumulation [8,9], attenuates lifestyle-related disease symptoms [10], promotes immune function [11,12], and improves bowel movements [13]. Autonomic nervous system activity plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis and is involved in biological processes such as lipolysis, blood glucose regulation, immune function, and digestion. For example, the autonomic nervous system of the pancreas contributes to the regulation of blood glucose levels by regulating insulin secretion [14]; in white adipose tissue the autonomic nervous system is involved in lipolysis [14,15]; in the spleen, it is involved in immunity [16,17], and in the stomach and intestines it is involved in the promotion of peristaltic movements [18]. These findings led us to hypothesize that various beneficial health effects of Euglena intake are mediated by its regulation of the autonomic nervous system balance.
In this study, we investigated the effects of the ingestion of Euglena-containing food for 12 weeks on the autonomic nervous system, psychological factors, and quality of sleep in men and women aged 20 to 64 years suffering from decreased motivation and a decline in sleep quality.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Euglena gracilis powder was obtained from euglena Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). The placebo food was the same formula but without Euglena powder.
2.2. Ingestion Study
2.2.1. Target Population
The study was conducted between July to November 2019. Subjects were healthy men and women between the ages of 20 and 64 years who were presented with reduced motivation based on the vitality (VT) measured by 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and poor quality of sleep based on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) total score. The purpose and content of the study were thoroughly explained to the subjects both verbally and in writing, and the subjects consented to participation by providing written informed consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects. Protection of the human rights of the subjects was always ensured, and the study was implemented under the supervision of a doctor with the approval of the ethics review committee of the Miura Clinic (approval number: R1816, approval date: 27 June 2019). This trial is registered with UMIN ID: 000037726.
2.2.2. Test Method
This study was designed and implemented as a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were selected after screening based on the level of motivation and quality of sleep. After baseline (week 0) measurements were obtained before the first dose, and the subjects received 500, 1000, or 3000 mg of Euglena powder or placebo powder (starch), divided into two doses per day (after breakfast and after dinner) for 12 weeks. The same measurements were taken at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after commencing intake. Subjects were instructed not to eat or drink after 10:00 p.m. on the day prior to the test and not to consume anything other than water until the designated meal was consumed on test day. On the examination day, subjects consumed the designated meal (200 g of rice) at least 4 h before they visited the hospital and had only water until the end of the examination. On the day measurements were taken, the subjects underwent a subjective index survey using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition (POMS2), SF-36, PSQI, Ogri-Shirakawa-Azumi Sleep Inventory MA Version (OSA-MS), autonomic system response indicator measurements, saliva collection, blood collection, and physical measurements such as height, weight and body mass index (BMI). After resting for 30 min, the subjects were subjected to the Uchida–Kraepelin [19,20,21,22] test for workload stress. The test took 30 min, including 15 min for the first half and 15 min for the second half with a break in the middle, while changing each line of simple single-digit addition once a minute. The correct answer rate for 15 min was calculated. The autonomic system response indicator measurements, saliva collection, and subjective index survey were repeated immediately after the Uchida–Kraepelin test. After resting for 60 min, the autonomic system response indicator measurements, saliva collection, and subjective index survey were performed again. During the test, the subjects drank water (about 100 mL) between the second subjective index survey and before starting the 60 min rest period.
Autonomic System Response Indicator Measurements
The balance of the autonomic nervous system, an indicator of fatigue and stress, was evaluated at three points for each test, i.e., before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, immediately after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading. The tests were conducted before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake. The vital monitor VM-302 (Fatigue Science Laboratory Inc., Osaka, Japan) was used to simultaneously measure the pulse wave (PPG) and cardiac wave (ECG) signals, and to analyze high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) components of heart rate fluctuation [21]. HF reflects the parasympathetic response and LF reflects the sympathetic response.
Measurements of Health-Related Quality of Life through the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
The health of the subjects was surveyed with a quality of life questionnaire before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake using an SF-36 v2 [23,24,25], based on universally applicable health-related concepts. A five-point scale was used for responses to each of the 36 questions, and the questions included eight items; physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH).
Measurements of Mood States Using the Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition (POMS2)
Six items, anxiety and tension, hostility and anger, depression and discouragement, vitality and activity, fatigue and lethargy, and confusion and perplexity, were evaluated based on the T score using the Japanese version of the POMS2 [22,26,27] at three points for each test, before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading. Measurements were obtained before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The 100-mm VAS was used to quantify fatigue, irritability, concentration, mood, motivation, tension, and satisfaction with sleep for 1 week at three points for each test, before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake. Each VAS question had an endpoint of 0 indicating a “positive situation” and an endpoint of 100 indicating a “negative situation.” Subjects were asked to mark the position on the line that represented their mood at the time. The distance from the endpoint of 0 to the mark was measured in mm.
Measurements of Quality of Sleep Using the Ogri-Shirakawa-Azumi Sleep Inventory MA Version (OSA-MA)
The sleep profile of the subjects was confirmed using OSA-MA [28,29], which includes five items related to sleep: sleepiness on rising, initiation and maintenance of sleep, frequent dreaming, refreshing, and sleep length. Items were assessed before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake. As for the score polarity, the direction of the good feeling of sleep had the highest score.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Japanese versionof the PSQI (PSQI-J) [29,30] was used to evaluate sleep quality before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake. The questions refer to the subject’s sleep profile in the past month and can be assigned to seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. These seven categories are assigned scores from 0 to 3, and a higher total score (0 to 21) indicates a worse sleep quality.
Saliva and Blood Samples
Saliva samples were collected to measure cortisol, a stress hormone, at three points for each test, before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake. A blood test was also performed at these times to confirm the safety of ingesting the test substance before intake and at 12 weeks.
2.2.3. Statistical Analyses
The baseline characteristics of the participants were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). After accounting for normality, two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs were performed since the autonomic nervous system response indices, salivary cortisol, POMS2, SF-36, OSA, and Uchida–Kraepelin test (correct answer rate) were normally distributed. Sessions (weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12) were within-subject independent variables and the study group (placebo and Euglena intake groups) were between-group independent variables. If a significant main effect of group, or a session x group, the interaction was found, we then followed up with post hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Kruskal–Wallis test was performed for VAS and PSQI since no normal distribution was found. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Dunnett’s test or Steel’s test was used to compare the measured values at each measurement time point and/or the degree of change from week 0 to after test among the four groups. Numerical values are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD). Significance levels were set as follows: <5% in two-sided tests indicated a significant difference. In addition, < 10% in the two-tailed test showed a significant trend. R version 3.5.1 (R development Core Team), and JMP (ver. 12) were used for statistical analyses.
3. Results
3.1. Subjects
In total, 122 participants were enrolled as the analysis set. After screening, 80 individuals were selected for the study. As three subjects withdrew during the trial, data for 77 subjects were analyzed (Figure 1).
Baseline data for subjects are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in parameters measured at baseline between the placebo and Euglena intake groups.
3.2. Safety Evaluation
Four complaints of symptoms were received during the study period, including fatigue, constipation, headache, and stiffness in the shoulder, although the symptoms were present before study participation and, although the cause could not be identified, the symptoms were mild and thus were judged by the investigator to be unproblematic. No abnormal values were found for vital signs such as blood pressure and pulse, nor in the blood test results. Subjects’ blood pressure, pulse rate, and blood test results are summarized in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2. Although some items significantly differed between weeks, most average values remained within the range of the reference value. No adverse events or other associated issues were observed.
3.3. Efficacy Evaluation
3.3.1. Autonomic System Response Indicator Measurements
The low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio is summarized in Table 2. LF and HF, which represent the balance of the sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system in the autonomic nervous system, were measured at three points for each test (before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading) before intake and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting intake. The LF/HF ratio was 3.7 in the placebo intake group, 3.3 in the Euglena 500 mg intake group, 4.1 in the 1000 mg intake group, and 4.7 in the Euglena 3000 mg intake group after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading at week 0. The LF/HF ratio was 6.3 in the placebo intake group, 4.7 in the Euglena 500 mg intake group, 2.9 in the 1000 mg intake group, and 5.1 in the Euglena 3000 mg intake group after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading at week 4 of intake. These findings suggest that the continuous intake of Euglena reduced disruptions in the balance of the autonomic nervous system. However, there were no significant differences.
The mean change amount of the LF/HF ratio before and after Uchida–Kraepelin loading at week 0 was 0.7. Thus, we defined subjects with a change amount greater than 0.7 as being more prone to workload stress based on Uchida–Kraepelin (Table 3). The LF/HF ratio in the Euglena 1000 mg intake group after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading at week 4 of intake was significantly lower than that in the placebo intake group (p = 0.024, Dunnett’s test). This suggests that the intake of Euglena 1000 mg regulates the balance of the autonomic nervous system during work stress. No difference was found in the balance of the autonomic nervous system in subjects without Uchida–Kraepelin stress. After week 8 of intake, these differences were difficult to discern.
3.3.2. Analysis of SF-36
Table 4 summarizes the SF-36 results. The role physical (RP) values were significantly higher at weeks 8 and 12 of treatment with Euglena 3000 mg intake group (53.5 ± 5.2 and 55.4 ± 3.5) than in the placebo intake group (47.3 ± 8.4 and 49.2 ± 8.2), suggesting that intake of Euglena improves RP (p = 0.036, p = 0.021, Dunnett’s test). At week 12 of intake, vitality (VT) tended to be higher in the 3000 mg Euglena intake group (51.2 ± 7.2) than in the placebo group (45.3 ± 5.5), indicating that the continuous intake of Euglena may also improve vitality (p = 0.065, Dunnett’s test).
3.3.3. POMS Analysis
Table 5 shows the results of a POMS analysis. Results from the intake of 500 mg of Euglena indicate that the scores for friendliness were significantly higher than those of the placebo intake group before, immediately after, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading at week 4 (p = 0.009, p = 0.007, and p = 0.0006, respectively, Dunnett’s test); before, immediately after, and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading at week 8 (p = 0.004, p = 0.062, and p = 0.040, respectively, Dunnett’s test); and immediately after and 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading at week 12 (p = 0.007, and p = 0.003, respectively, Dunnett’s test), respectively.
3.3.4. VAS Analysis
Table 6 and Table 7 show the VAS results. The amount of change in tension from before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading to 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading in week 8 was 0.86 ± 1.67 in the placebo intake group, −0.41 ± 1.61 in the 500 mg Euglena intake group, and −0.29 ± 1.43 in the 3000 mg Euglena intake group, demonstrating a reduction in tension (p = 0.097, p = 0.099, Steel’s test). The degree of change in tension from before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading to 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading in week 12 was 0.91 ± 1.77 in the placebo intake group and −0.74 ± 1.51 in the 1000 mg Euglena intake group, indicating a significant easing of tension (p = 0.023, Steel’s test).
The amount of change in irritability from before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading to immediately after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading in week 12 was 1.79 ± 2.00 in the placebo intake group and 0.27 ± 1.59 in the 1000 mg Euglena intake group (p = 0.057 Steel’s test). The amount of change in irritability from before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading to 60 min after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading in week 12 was 1.29 ± 2.02 in the placebo intake group and −0.54 ± 1.30 in the 1000 mg Euglena intake group, showing a significant easing of irritability caused by Uchida–Kraepelin stress (p = 0.008, Steel’s test).
The amount of change in the level of subjective satisfaction with sleep from week 0 to 4 was -0.89 ± 1.44 in the placebo intake group and −2.61 ± 1.75 in the 3000 mg Euglena intake group, showing a significant increase in the level of subjective satisfaction with sleep (p = 0.007, Steel’s test). The amount of change in the level of subjective satisfaction with sleep from week 0 to 12 was −0.65 ± 1.22 in the placebo intake group, −2.22 ± 3.08 in the 500 mg Euglena intake group, −2.69 ± 2.31 in the 1000 mg Euglena intake group, and −3.41 ± 2.26 in the 3000 mg Euglena intake group, showing a significant difference increase in the level of subjective satisfaction with sleep (p = 0.028, p = 0.012, p = 0.0006, respectively, Steel’s test).
3.3.5. OSA Analysis
Table 8 shows the OSA results. Sleepiness on rising was significantly higher after 8 weeks of the continuous intake of Euglena 500 mg (47.7 ± 9.0) than in the placebo intake group (41.5 ± 5.3) (p = 0.027, Dunnett’s test); at week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 500 mg (48.9 ± 10.8) than in the placebo intake group (41.4 ± 7.2) (p = 0.027, Dunnett’s test); and at week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 3000 mg (48.3 ± 8.9) than in the placebo intake group (41.4 ± 7.2) (p = 0.040, Dunnett’s test). These results suggest that the quality of sleep may improve with the intake of Euglena.
The “refreshing” index tended to be higher at week 8 after the continuous intake of Euglena 500 mg (47.0 ± 8.5) than in the placebo intake group (41.1 ± 4.7) (p = 0.055, Dunnett’s test). This index was significantly higher in week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 500 mg (48.4 ± 8.0) than in the placebo intake group (41.6 ± 7.0) (p = 0.032, Dunnett’s test). This index was significantly higher at week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 3000 mg (49.0 ± 8.2) than in the placebo intake group (41.6 ± 7.0) (p = 0.016, Dunnett’s test). These results suggest that the quality of sleep may improve with the intake of Euglena.
Sleep length tended to be longer in week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 500 mg (51.3 ± 9.3) than in the placebo intake group (44.5 ± 7.1) (p = 0.060, Dunnett’s test). Sleep length tended to be longer in week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 3000 mg (50.7 ± 10.9) than in the placebo intake group (44.5 ± 7.1) (p = 0.089, Dunnett’s test). These findings suggest that the quality of sleep may improve with the intake of Euglena.
3.3.6. PSQI Analysis
Table 9 shows the results of a PSQI analysis. The total PSQI score was significantly lower at week 4 after the continuous intake of Euglena 3000 mg (5.1 ± 2.0) than in the placebo intake group (7.1 ± 2.6) (p = 0.039, Steel’s test); at week 12 after the continuous intake of Euglena 3000 mg (4.2 ± 2.1) than in the placebo intake group (6.3 ± 2.3) (p = 0.026, Steel’s test); and after the continuous intake of Euglena 1000 mg (4.7 ± 2.1) compared with the placebo intake group (6.3 ± 2.3) (p = 0.070, Steel’s test). These results suggest that the quality of sleep may improve with the intake of Euglena.
3.3.7. Analysis of Saliva Samples
No significant differences were observed in the salivary cortisol levels.
3.3.8. Uchida–Kraepelin Results
Table 10 shows the correct answer rates in the Uchida–Kraepelin test. The correct answer rate in the first half increased significantly in weeks 8 and 12 of intake of Euglena 1000 mg (p = 0.009, and p = 0.020, respectively, Dunnett’s test).
The correct answer rate in the first half tended to increase in week 8 with the continuous intake of Euglena 500 mg (p = 0.083, Dunnett’s test), in week 12 with the continuous intake of Euglena 3000 mg (p = 0.067, Dunnett’s test).
4. Discussion
We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of Euglena intake on various properties, such as the autonomic nervous system, psychological parameters, and quality of sleep. Our results indicated that the intake of Euglena regulates the autonomic nervous system balance and improves various symptoms caused by stress loading. In addition, we observed no adverse events with a maximum intake of 3000 mg of Euglena per day, confirming that this dose is safe.
The subjects included in the study were concerned about a lack of motivation and a decline in the quality of sleep. However, the sympathetic nervous system was in a dominant state in these individuals, with a high LF/HF ratio, which is an indicator of the autonomic nervous system balance, exceeding the normal value of 2.0. Previous studies have shown that Uchida–Kraepelin stress affects heart rate variability [31,32,33,34]. We selected subjects who felt that taking the Uchida–Kraepelin test was stressful had a substantial increase in their LF/HF ratios. We found that the intake of Euglena at 1000 mg suppressed the LF/HF ratio compared with that in the placebo intake group. When the LF/HF ratio was broken down into the components LF and HF, a decrease in LF had a relatively large impact upon 500 mg and 1000 mg Euglena intake. Therefore, Euglena may have suppressed the excitation of the sympathetic nervous system. The intake of Euglena significantly suppressed the LF/HF ratios in individuals subjected to work stress and appeared to regulate the autonomic nervous system balance. The most effective dose was 1000 mg.
Irritability and tension during work stress were maintained at high levels even 60 min after exposure to work stress in the placebo intake group; however, these parameters were suppressed in the Euglena intake groups of 500 mg or more and were significantly suppressed in the 1000 mg intake group, indicating an improvement in the psychological state. In other words, the intake of Euglena may have alleviated the tension caused by Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading.
In a POMS2 analysis, which evaluates emotions, the score for friendship (F) was significantly higher in the group taking 500 mg of Euglena per day at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after starting intake, both before and after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading. This suggests that the continuous intake of 500 mg Euglena can enhance friendliness. However, this did not occur upon taking Euglena at doses other than 500 mg. In SF-36, which evaluates health-related quality of life, a significant difference was observed in daily physical function (role physical), which represents physical fatigue.
Improvement of sleep quality with the intake of Euglena was confirmed based on three sleep tests: VAS, OSA, and PSQI. These effects increased in a dose- and time-dependent manners. The parasympathetic nervous system is enhanced at the onset of sleep [35]; accordingly, the improvement in sleep quality by Euglena intake was likely due to an improvement in the balance of the autonomic nervous system.
Euglena intake also increased the correct answer rate on the Uchida–Kraepelin test. These findings suggest that the continuous intake of Euglena may improve concentration and work efficiency.
The autonomic nervous system includes the sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system. It regulates various functions, such as respiration/circulation, digestion/absorption, secretion, and metabolism, and serves an important role in the maintenance of homeostasis in the body. However, when stress signals are transmitted to the hypothalamus in the brain, the autonomic nervous system is excited, depending on the type of stress. An imbalance in the autonomic nervous system due to excessive stress may prevent the proper activation of the sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system. These conditions may cause excessive irritability, an inability to concentrate, deterioration of sleep quality, weakened immunity, and various ailments, including problems with bowel movements. For example, patients with chronic fatigue syndrome caused by stress experience a decrease in parasympathetic nervous system function and a relative increase in sympathetic nervous system function, depending on the degree of subjective fatigue evaluated by the VAS. This shows that there is a relationship between fatigue and the autonomic nervous system [36]. Therefore, it is important to maintain a well-balanced autonomic nervous system. In this study, the intake of Euglena improved the autonomic nervous system balance, thereby improving irritability and tension as well as the quality of daily sleep. Previous studies have evaluated improvements in autonomic nervous system activity after nutritional supplementation in healthy subjects [37,38,39,40]. When stress is transmitted to the hypothalamus in the brain, a signal is sent to excite the autonomic nervous system, depending on the type of stress, and a command is simultaneously sent to the pituitary gland to stimulate the thyroid, adrenal medulla, and adrenal cortex via the release of hormones. In addition, signals from the hypothalamus stimulate the adrenal cortex in response to stress; the pituitary gland secretes the adrenocorticotrophic hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and the adrenal cortex secretes the hormone cortisol. In this way, the hypothalamus, which controls the autonomic nervous system, also controls the pituitary gland, which secretes various hormones and neurotransmitters. Therefore, a mutual relationship exists whereby an imbalance in the autonomic nervous system affects the secretion of hormones and neurotransmitters, thereby affecting the balance of the autonomic nervous system. Proteins, B vitamins, and minerals, such as magnesium, are required for hormones and neurotransmitters. A lack of vitamin B6 makes it difficult for the body to produce serotonin and melatonin, leading to insomnia and autonomic nervous system ataxia. The overconsumption of zinc is related to stress, and a shortage of vitamin B makes it difficult to produce energy in the mitochondria, which increases fatigue and malaise. Euglena consist of a wide variety of nutrients, such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and unsaturated fatty acids. The ingestion of Euglena assists in replenishing these nutrients in the body, which not only improves autonomic nervous system activity but also normalizes the secretion of hormones and neurotransmitters, contributing to the regulation of the autonomic nervous system balance. In this study, we found no changes in cortisol levels, which suggests that hormone levels are being affected rather than cortisol levels and that the stress of Uchida–Kraepelin may not affect cortisol production [41]; this warrants further investigation.
Meanwhile, previous studies have used in vitro cell-type-specific calcium imaging to prove that Euglena directly induces Ca2+ signaling in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons, suggesting that Euglena excites visceral afferents [42]. Although the mechanism underlying the beneficial effects of Euglena in our study remains unclear, its ability to excite neurons may contribute to improvements in health-related quality of life [12]. Further studies are needed to better clarify the physiological role of visceral afferents in response to food constituents.
The storage polysaccharide paramylon in Euglena regulates the immune balance. Previous studies of mouse models have confirmed that the ingestion of Euglena or paramylon alleviates the symptoms of influenza infection [11], rheumatoid arthritis [43], and atopic dermatitis [44]. The autonomic nervous system is involved in the regulation of immunity, and immunity is generally enhanced in situations where the parasympathetic nervous system is dominant, contributing to defense against infection [16,17]. Cortisol also suppresses the immune system [45]. Previous studies have investigated the ability of paramylon to regulate immunity by binding to Dectin-1 expressed on intestinal immune cells [46,47]; however, it could also mediate immunity by the regulation of the autonomic nervous system and endocrine system.
The results of this study suggest that the intake of Euglena-containing food may regulate the autonomic nervous system balance under stress and may have favorable effects on work efficiency, psychological factors, and sleep quality. However, this study had some limitations. First, although this study was conducted with a small homogeneous cohort of individuals from one population, future studies are required to further elucidate these aspects with various ethnicities and people with different backgrounds and stress levels. Furthermore, although some of the effects were dependent on intake dose, other effects were observed for which an optimal dose may exist independent of intake, thus requiring further investigation. In the future, we would like to further investigate the mechanism underlying these beneficial effects as well.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/11/3243/s1, Table S1: Summary of blood test results. Table S2: Summary of blood pressure and pulse rate test results.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.N., K.Y., and N.M.; methodology, A.N. and K.Y.; formal analysis, A.N., K.Y., and A.M.; resources, A.N., K.Y., A.M., and K.S.; original draft preparation and writing, A.N.; review and editing, A.N., K.Y., A.M., K.S., and N.M.; supervision, K.S. and N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
The authors greatly appreciate the useful suggestions and technical support from Oneness support Co. Ltd.
Conflicts of Interest
A.N., K.Y., A.M., and K.S. are salaried employees of euglena Co. Ltd., which produced some of the Euglena used in this study. All research funding for this study was provided by euglena Co. Ltd. N.M. is the medical advisor of this study, and received honorarium from euglena Co. Ltd. There are no other conflicts of interest.
References
- Selye, H. The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1946, 6, 117–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataoka, N.; Shima, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Nakamura, K. A central master driver of psychosocial stress responses in the rat. Science 2020, 6, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besedovsky, H.O.; del Rey, A. Introduction: Immune-neuroendocrine network. Front. Horm. Res. 2002, 29, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olini, N.; Rothfuchs, I.; Azzinnari, D.; Pryce, C.R.; Kurth, S.; Huber, R. Chronic social stress leads to altered sleep homeostasis in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2017, 327, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cacioppo, J.T. Social neuroscience: Autonomic, neuroendocrine, and immune responses to stress. Psychophysiology 1994, 31, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, K. Large-scale cultivation of Euglena. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 979, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimada, R.; Fujita, M.; Yuasa, M.; Sawamura, H.; Watanabe, T.; Nakashima, A.; Suzuki, K. Oral administration of green algae, Euglena gracilis, inhibits hyperglycemia in OLETF rats, a model of spontaneous type 2 diabetes. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 4655–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sakanoi, Y.; Shuang, E.; Yamamoto, K.; Ota, T.; Seki, K.; Imai, M.; Ota, R.; Asayama, Y.; Nakashima, A.; Suzuki, K.; et al. Simultaneous intake of Euglena gracilis and vegetables synergistically exerts an anti-inflammatory effect and attenuates visceral fat accumulation by affecting gut microbiota in mice. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Okouchi, R.; Shuang, E.; Yamamoto, K.; Ota, T.; Seki, K.; Imai, M.; Ota, R.; Asayama, Y.; Nakashima, A.; Suzuki, K.; et al. Simultaneous intake of Euglena gracilis and vegetables exerts synergistic anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory effects by modulating the gut microbiota in diet-induced obese mice. Nutrients 2019, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aoe, S.; Yamanaka, C.; Nishioka, M.; Onaka, N.; Nishida, N.; Takahashi, M. Effects of paramylon extracted from Euglena gracilis EOD-1 on parameters related to metabolic syndrome in diet-induced obese mice. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nakashima, A.; Suzuki, K.; Asayama, Y.; Konno, M.; Saito, K.; Yamazaki, N.; Takimoto, H. Oral administration of Euglena gracilis Z and its carbohydrate storage substance provides survival protection against influenza virus infection in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 494, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishibashi, K.; Nishioka, M.; Onaka, N.; Takahashi, M.; Yamanaka, D.; Adachi, Y.; Ohno, N. Effects of Euglena gracilis EOD-1 ingestion on salivary IgA reactivity and health-related quality of life in humans. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Watanabe, T.; Shimada, R.; Matsuyama, A.; Yuasa, M.; Sawamura, H.; Yoshida, E.; Suzuki, K. Antitumor activity of the β-glucan paramylon from Euglena against preneoplastic colonic aberrant crypt foci in mice. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niijima, A. Nervous regulation of metabolism. Prog. Neurobiol. 1989, 33, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartness, T.J.; Bamshad, M. Innervation of mammalian white adipose tissue: Implications for the regulation of total body fat. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, R1399–R1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Horii, Y.; Fujisaki, Y.; Nagai, K. Effects of L-arginine and L-lysine mixtures on splenic sympathetic nerve activity and tumor proliferation. Auton. Neurosci. 2009, 147, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katafuchi, T.; Ichijo, T.; Take, S.; Hori, T. Hypothalamic modulation of splenic natural killer cell activity in rats. J. Physiol. 1993, 471, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMenamin, C.A.; Travagli, R.A.; Browning, K.N. Inhibitory neurotransmission regulates vagal efferent activity and gastric motility. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016, 241, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kuraishi, S.; Kato, M.; Tsujioka, B. Development of the “Uchida-Kuraepelin Psychodiagnostic Test” in Japan. Psychologia 2000, 1, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
- Januszewicz, W.; Sznajderman, M.; Wocial, B.; Feltynowski, T.; Klonowicz, T. The effect of mental stress on catecholamines, their metabolites and plasma renin activity in patients with essential hypertension and in healthy subjects. Clin. Sci. 1979, 57, 229s–231s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sumiyoshi, T.; Yotsutsuji, T.; Kurachi, M.; Itoh, H.; Kurokawa, K.; Saitoh, O. Effect of mental stress on plasma homovanillic acid in healthy human subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 1998, 19, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takanari, J.; Nakahigashi, J.; Sato, A.; Waki, H.; Miyazaki, S.; Uebaba, K.; Hisajima, T. Effect of enzyme-treated asparagus extract (ETAS) on psychological stress in healthy individuals. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2016, 62, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fukuhara, S.; Ware Jr, J.E.; Kosinski, M.; Wada, S.; Gandek, B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998, 51, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukuhara, S.; Bito, S.; Green, J.; Hsiao, A.; Kurokawa, K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998, 51, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukuhara, S.; Suzukamo, Y. Manual of SF-36v2 Japanese Version; Institute for Health Outcomes and Process Evaluation Research: Kyoto, Japan, 2004; pp. 7–145. [Google Scholar]
- McNair, D.M.; Lorr, M. An analysis of mood in neurotics. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1964, 69, 62–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shacham, S. A shortened version of the profile of mood states. J. Pers. Assess. 1983, 47, 305–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oguri, M.; Shirakawa, S.; Azumi, K. Construction of standard rating scale to estimate sleep profile. Seishin Igaku 1985, 27, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masafumi, N.; Hirotaka, Y.; Miyuki, K.; Naoki, M.; Koji, W.; Takuro, E. Effects of lactic acid bacteria-containing foods on the quality of sleep: A placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized crossover study. Funct. Food Health Dis. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds, C.F.; Monk, T.H.; Berman, S.R.; Kupfer, D.J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989, 28, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, Y.; Natsuko, M.; Teruyuki, N.; Hiroyuki, I.; Mitsunori, K.; Kimihide, N.; Tadasu, U. Relationship of a Special Acidified Milk Protein Drink with Cognitive Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Young Adults. Nutrients 2018, 10, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kazuo, O.; Mami, K.; Takashi, N.; Toshiyuki, N.; Richard, E.; Williams, S.H. Individual differences in physiological responses and type A behavior pattern. Appl. Human Sci. 1999, 3, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoshiyasu, F.; Hitoshi, O. Hearing laughter improves the recovery process of the autonomic nervous system after a stress-loading task: A randomized controlled trial. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2018, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuratsune, D.; Seiki, T.; Junichi, K.; Kouzi, Y.; Tetsuya, S.; Kei, M.; Masaaki, T.; Naoko, O.; Hideki, M.; Hirokazu, T.; et al. Changes in reaction time, coefficient of variance of reaction time, and autonomic nerve function in the mental fatigue state caused by long-term computerized Kraepelin test workload in healthy volunteers. World J. Neurosci. 2012, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Werner, G.G.; Ford, B.Q.; Mauss, I.B.; Schabus, M.; Blechert, J.; Wilhelm, F.H. High cardiac vagal control is related to better subjective and objective sleep quality. Biol. Psychol. 2015, 106, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tanaka, M.; Mizuno, K.; Yamaguti, K.; Kuratsune, H.; Fujii, A.; Baba, H.; Matsuda, K.; Nishimae, A.; Takesaka, T.; Watanabe, Y. Autonomic nervous alterations associated with daily level of fatigue. Behav. Brain Funct. 2011, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fukuda, S.; Koyama, H.; Kondo, K.; Fujii, H.; Hirayama, Y.; Tabata, T.; Okamura, M.; Yamakawa, T.; Okada, S.; Hirata, S.; et al. Effects of nutritional supplementation on fatigue, and autonomic and immune dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Piccirillo, G.; Raffaele, Q.; Fimognari, F.; Moise, A.; Mario, M.; Lionetti, M.; Naso, C.; Di Carlo, S.; Nocco, M.; Magrì, D. Influence of l-arginine and vitamin C on the autonomic nervous system in chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004, 93, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, K.; Fukuma, N.; Kimura-Kato, Y.; Aisu, N.; Tuchida, T.; Mabuchi, K.; Takano, T. Improvement of sympathetic response to exercise by oral administration of ascorbic acid in patients after myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2006, 111, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, A.; Moritani, T. Influence of CoQ10 on autonomic nervous activity and energy metabolism during exercise in healthy subjects. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2008, 54, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koreaki, S.; Aya, K.; Noriaki, S. The effectiveness of the Uchida-Kraepelin test for psychological stress: An analysis of plasma and salivary stress substances. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yasuda, K.; Nakashima, A.; Murata, A.; Suzuki, K.; Adachi, T. Euglena Gracilis and β-Glucan Paramylon Induce Ca2+ Signaling in Intestinal Tract Epithelial, Immune, and Neural Cells. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, K.; Nakashima, A.; Igarashi, M.; Saito, K.; Konno, M.; Yamazaki, N.; Takimoto, H. Euglena gracilis Z and its carbohydrate storage substance relieve arthritis symptoms by modulating Th17 immunity. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sugiyama, A.; Hata, S.; Suzuki, K.; Yoshida, E.; Nakano, R.; Mitra, S.; Arashida, R.; Asayama, Y.; Yabuta, Y.; Takeuchi, T. Oral administration of paramylon, a β-1,3-d-glucan isolated from Euglena gracilis Z inhibits development of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in NC/Nga mice. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010, 72, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dimitrov, S.; Benedict, C.; Heutling, D.; Westermann, J.; Born, J.; Lange, T. Cortisol and epinephrine control opposing circadian rhythms in T cell subsets. Blood 2009, 113, 5134–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nakashima, A.; Yamada, K.; Iwata, O.; Sugimoto, R.; Atsuji, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ishibashi-Ohgo, N.; Suzuki, K. β-glucan in foods and its physiological functions. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2018, 64, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ujita, M.; Nagayama, H.; Kanie, S.; Koike, S.; Ikeyama, Y.; Ozaki, T.; Okumura, H. Carbohydrate binding specificity of recombinant human macrophage β-glucan receptor dectin-1. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Flow chart for subject participation.
Table 1.
Baseline data for subjects. After accounting for normality, the baseline characteristics of the participants were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test.
Table 1.
Baseline data for subjects. After accounting for normality, the baseline characteristics of the participants were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test.
| SF-36 | LH/HF | PSQI | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | Male (n) | Female (n) | Age (Years) | Height | Weight | BMI | VT | Before | After | Δ After | Total Score | |
| Placebo | 18 | 8 | 10 | Mean | 47.3 | 164.2 | 58.9 | 21.7 | 35.8 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 7.7 |
| SD | 9.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 1.7 | 12.1 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 2.6 | ||||
| Euglena | 19 | 9 | 10 | Mean | 47.8 | 165.2 | 60.1 | 22.0 | 39.8 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 8.1 |
| 500 mg | SD | 11.5 | 6.4 | 9.8 | 2.8 | 14.6 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 3.1 | |||
| Euglena | 20 | 9 | 11 | Mean | 46.0 | 164.6 | 59.9 | 22.0 | 33.2 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 7.4 |
| 1000 mg | SD | 10.7 | 10.8 | 10.9 | 2.3 | 12.4 | 2.4 | 6.6 | 5.8 | 2.4 | |||
| Euglena | 20 | 9 | 11 | Mean | 48.0 | 162.8 | 59.9 | 22.5 | 34.1 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 0.8 | 6.8 |
| 3000 mg | SD | 9.7 | 8.4 | 10.6 | 2.8 | 11.7 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 2.2 | |||
| p-value (one-way ANOVA) | 0.931 | 0.838 | 0.980 | 0.804 | 0.381 | 0.822 | 0.775 | 0.931 | - | ||||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.556 | ||||
BMI: body mass index, SF-36: 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, VT: vitality, LF/HF: low-frequency/high-frequency, PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Table 2.
Summary of LF/HF ratios, an indicator of autonomic nervous system balance. Low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) indicate sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous, respectively. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results were not significantly different.
Table 2.
Summary of LF/HF ratios, an indicator of autonomic nervous system balance. Low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) indicate sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous, respectively. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results were not significantly different.
| LF/HF 0 Weeks | LF/HF 4 Weeks | LF/HF 8 Weeks | LF/HF 12 Weeks | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | |
| Placebo | 18 | Mean | 3.1 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 6.3 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.7 |
| SD | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.6 | ||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 2.9 |
| 500 mg | SD | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.7 | |
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 3.1 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.7 |
| 1000 mg | SD | 2.4 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.8 | |
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 2.7 |
| 3000 mg | SD | 5.0 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 1.8 | |
LF/HF: low-frequency/high-frequency.
Table 3.
Summary of LF/HF ratios, an indicator of autonomic nervous system balance (Subjects defined as susceptible to stress). After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a session x group interaction in “After” (p = 0.036) and were followed up with a post-hoc comparison using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of the means of the placebo group and Euglena intake groups before and after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after loading at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Table 3.
Summary of LF/HF ratios, an indicator of autonomic nervous system balance (Subjects defined as susceptible to stress). After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a session x group interaction in “After” (p = 0.036) and were followed up with a post-hoc comparison using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of the means of the placebo group and Euglena intake groups before and after Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading, and 60 min after loading at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
| LF/HF 0 Weeks | LF/HF 4 Weeks | LF/HF 8 Weeks | LF/HF 12 Weeks | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | |
| Placebo | 8 | Mean | 3.1 | 6.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 10.3 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| SD | 2.5 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 7.8 | 9.7 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 3.8 | ||
| Euglena | 8 | Mean | 2.5 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| 500 mg | SD | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.1 | |
| Euglena | 8 | Mean | 3.1 | 8.1 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 2.6 * | 2.6 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| 1000 mg | SD | 2.1 | 9.2 | 7.8 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 4.7 | 3.4 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 3.9 | |
| Euglena | 10 | Mean | 3.3 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| 3000 mg | SD | 2.3 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 5.7 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.0 | |
* p < 0.05 vs. the placebo intake group. LF/HF: low-frequency/high-frequency.
Table 4.
Analyses of role physical (RP) and vitality (VT) based on SF-36. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a main effect of group in RP (p = 0.023) and a session x group interaction in VT (p = 0.052). Therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo intake group and Euglena intake group at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Table 4.
Analyses of role physical (RP) and vitality (VT) based on SF-36. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a main effect of group in RP (p = 0.023) and a session x group interaction in VT (p = 0.052). Therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo intake group and Euglena intake group at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
| Group | n | 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RP | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 44.2 | 48.5 | 47.3 | 49.2 |
| SD | 10.0 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 8.2 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 43.9 | 48.7 | 48.7 | 50.2 | |
| 500 mg | SD | 10.3 | 8.8 | 6.7 | 7.8 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 44.3 | 44.1 | 47.5 | 50.2 | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 9.6 | 10.4 | 9.5 | 7.6 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 46.9 | 54.1 | 53.5 * | 55.4 * | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 8.3 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 3.5 | ||
| VT | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 39.9 | 46.8 | 44.3 | 45.3 |
| SD | 5.9 | 6.5 | 8.7 | 5.4 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 41.8 | 46.2 | 47.8 | 49.0 | |
| 500 mg | SD | 7.1 | 9.4 | 10.9 | 9.4 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 38.6 | 42.7 | 43.9 | 45.1 | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 6.0 | 8.7 | 10.1 | 9.1 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 39.0 | 48.6 | 49.7 | 51.2 † | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 5.7 | 7.3 | 6.2 | 7.2 |
* p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo intake group. SF-36: 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, RP: role physical, VT: vitality.
Table 5.
Analyses of friendliness as determined by POMS2. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a session x group interaction in “Before,” “After,” and “60 min after” (p = 0.075, p = 0.009, and p = 0.012, respectively) and a main effect of group in “Before,” “After,” and “60 min after” (p = 0.058, p = 0.055, and p = 0.018, respectively). Therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of the mean values in the placebo intake group and Euglena intake groups before and after Uchida-Kraepelin stress loading and 60 min after loading at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Table 5.
Analyses of friendliness as determined by POMS2. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a session x group interaction in “Before,” “After,” and “60 min after” (p = 0.075, p = 0.009, and p = 0.012, respectively) and a main effect of group in “Before,” “After,” and “60 min after” (p = 0.058, p = 0.055, and p = 0.018, respectively). Therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of the mean values in the placebo intake group and Euglena intake groups before and after Uchida-Kraepelin stress loading and 60 min after loading at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
| 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | |
| Placebo | 18 | Mean | 44.6 | 41.4 | 39.3 | 44.0 | 39.3 | 36.9 | 41.1 | 39.4 | 39.2 | 44.1 | 37.7 | 37.2 |
| SD | 11.4 | 9.9 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 10.3 | 9.5 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 11.0 | 10.1 | 9.7 | 8.9 | ||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 48.5 | 44.4 | 45.3 | 54.2 ** | 51.8 ** | 52.5 *** | 52.9 ** | 48.2 † | 48.9 * | 50.8 | 49.7 ** | 50.6 ** |
| 500 mg | SD | 11.7 | 11.1 | 13.3 | 12.1 | 13.0 | 13.6 | 13.0 | 14.5 | 15.0 | 12.9 | 15.1 | 15.9 | |
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 45.7 | 41.4 | 41.9 | 45.5 | 42.3 | 42.4 | 45.6 | 40.8 | 40.3 | 44.9 | 42.1 | 41.0 |
| 1000 mg | SD | 8.0 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 11.9 | 10.3 | 6.1 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 9.8 | |
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 48.1 | 44.3 | 43.3 | 46.9 | 42.4 | 42.9 | 47.6 | 43.5 | 41.9 | 44.9 | 42.9 | 41.8 |
| 3000 mg | SD | 10.4 | 11.0 | 12.2 | 9.8 | 13.2 | 14.3 | 11.7 | 11.6 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 12.0 | 11.8 | |
*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo group. POMS2: Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition.
Table 6.
Analyses of tension and irritability measured by the VAS. After accounting for normality, Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Steel’s test was used for intergroup comparison of the mean change from before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading to immediately after, and 60 min after stress loading at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks in the placebo and Euglena intake groups.
Table 6.
Analyses of tension and irritability measured by the VAS. After accounting for normality, Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Steel’s test was used for intergroup comparison of the mean change from before Uchida–Kraepelin stress loading to immediately after, and 60 min after stress loading at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks in the placebo and Euglena intake groups.
| 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | Before | After | 60 min after | ||
| Tension | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 5.14 | 4.84 | 4.82 | 4.21 | 4.29 | 4.18 | 3.88 | 4.77 | 4.74 | 4.11 | 5.58 | 5.02 |
| SD | 1.54 | 2.26 | 2.33 | 1.80 | 2.09 | 2.10 | 1.61 | 1.92 | 1.94 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.89 | |||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −0.30 | −0.33 | - | 0.09 | −0.02 | - | 0.89 | 0.86 | - | 1.47 | 0.91 | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 1.78 | 1.66 | - | 1.55 | 1.99 | - | 1.47 | 1.67 | - | 1.86 | 1.77 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 3.74 | 3.39 | 2.68 * | 3.30 | 3.09 | 2.77 | 2.63 | 2.59 ** | 2.22 ** | 2.81 | 3.32 * | 2.71 ** | |
| 500 mg | SD | 1.79 | 2.12 | 1.80 | 2.27 | 2.36 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 1.85 | 1.77 | 1.95 | 2.16 | 2.11 | ||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −0.35 | −1.05 | - | −0.21 | −0.53 | - | −0.04 | −0.41 † | - | 0.51 | −0.09 | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 1.66 | 1.94 | - | 1.56 | 1.31 | - | 1.72 | 1.61 | - | 1.67 | 1.94 | |||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 4.84 | 4.58 | 3.84 | 3.74 | 4.21 | 3.56 | 3.20 | 3.92 | 3.33 † | 3.94 | 3.69 * | 3.20 * | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 1.50 | 1.89 | 1.78 | 1.51 | 1.41 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.95 | 1.70 | 1.65 | 1.81 | 1.65 | ||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −0.26 | −1.00 | - | 0.47 | −0.18 | - | 0.72 | 0.13 | - | −0.25 | −0.74 * | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 1.96 | 1.87 | - | 1.65 | 1.38 | - | 1.29 | 1.08 | - | 1.92 | 1.52 | |||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 4.61 | 4.29 | 3.59 | 3.23 | 3.60 | 2.82 † | 3.06 | 3.37 † | 2.78 ** | 3.15 | 3.38 ** | 2.72 ** | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 1.33 | 2.21 | 2.42 | 1.66 | 1.89 | 1.75 | 1.85 | 1.90 | 1.54 | 1.81 | 2.14 | 2.17 | ||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −0.32 | −1.02 | - | 0.37 | −0.41 | - | 0.31 | −0.29 † | - | 0.23 | −0.43 | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 1.42 | 2.13 | - | 2.08 | 2.50 | - | 1.57 | 1.43 | - | 2.12 | 2.14 | |||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test) | 0.0663 † | 0.1442 | 0.032 * | 0.4204 | 0.2222 | 0.0975 † | 0.1562 | 0.0102 * | 0.0011 ** | 0.0988 † | 0.0049 ** | 0.0038 ** | |||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test/Amount of change) | 0.9468 | 0.6333 | 0.4346 | 0.6664 | 0.1564 | 0.0906 † | 0.14 | 0.0682 † | |||||||
| Irritability | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 6.09 | 5.04 | 5.41 | 4.64 | 4.62 | 4.63 | 4.23 | 5.33 | 5.32 | 4.08 | 5.88 | 5.38 |
| SD | 1.49 | 2.64 | 2.49 | 2.33 | 2.36 | 2.33 | 2.02 | 1.93 | 1.89 | 1.57 | 1.62 | 2.09 | |||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −1.06 | −0.69 | - | −0.02 | −0.01 | - | 1.11 | 1.09 | - | 1.79 | 1.29 | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 2.99 | 2.91 | - | 2.67 | 2.39 | - | 1.99 | 1.92 | - | 2.00 | 2.02 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 4.60 | 3.36 | 3.23 † | 2.85 † | 3.05 | 2.72 * | 2.61 | 2.97 * | 2.29 ** | 2.56 † | 3.33 * | 2.97 * | |
| 500 mg | SD | 2.45 | 2.56 | 3.02 | 2.50 | 2.56 | 2.46 | 2.15 | 2.56 | 2.30 | 2.03 | 2.87 | 2.55 | ||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −1.24 | −1.37 | - | 0.21 | −0.13 | - | 0.36 | −0.32 | - | 0.76 | 0.41 | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 3.13 | 3.49 | - | 2.46 | 2.08 | - | 2.19 | 2.25 | - | 1.78 | 1.99 | |||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 5.54 | 5.70 | 4.69 | 3.61 | 5.04 | 4.82 | 3.58 | 4.65 | 4.11 | 4.21 | 4.48 | 3.67 † | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 1.97 | 2.52 | 2.52 | 2.42 | 2.53 | 2.63 | 2.37 | 2.52 | 2.51 | 2.49 | 2.65 | 2.40 | ||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | 0.16 | −0.86 | - | 1.43 | 1.21 | - | 1.07 | 0.54 | - | 0.27 † | −0.54 ** | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 1.68 | 1.53 | - | 2.15 | 2.39 | - | 2.16 | 2.07 | - | 1.59 | 1.30 | |||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 4.67 | 4.49 | 3.62 † | 3.21 | 4.03 | 3.25 | 3.44 | 4.11 | 3.12 ** | 2.83 † | 4.35 | 3.42 * | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 2.68 | 2.53 | 2.46 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 2.02 | 2.75 | 2.47 | 1.98 | 2.14 | 2.45 | 2.45 | ||
| Mean (Amount of change) | - | −0.18 | −1.05 | - | 0.82 | 0.04 | - | 0.68 | −0.32 | - | 1.52 | 0.59 | |||
| SD (Amount of change) | - | 3.27 | 2.61 | - | 2.62 | 2.47 | - | 2.92 | 2.34 | - | 2.87 | 2.67 | |||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test) | 0.2245 | 0.0641 † | 0.0649 † | 0.1172 | 0.0827 † | 0.0155 * | 0.2593 | 0.0335 * | 0.0007 *** | 0.0317 * | 0.0352 * | 0.0199 * | |||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test/Amount of change) | - | 0.3628 | 0.8083 | - | 0.3075 | 0.3036 | - | 0.6082 | 0.3015 | - | 0.0927 † | 0.0323 * | |||
*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo intake group. VAS: visual Analog Scale.
Table 7.
Analyses of the level of subjective satisfaction with sleep measured by the VAS. After accounting for normality, Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Steel’s test was used for intergroup comparison of the mean change at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks in the placebo and Euglena intake groups.
Table 7.
Analyses of the level of subjective satisfaction with sleep measured by the VAS. After accounting for normality, Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Steel’s test was used for intergroup comparison of the mean change at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks in the placebo and Euglena intake groups.
| Group | n | 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | Δ 4 Weeks | Δ 8 Weeks | Δ 12 Weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 6.93 | 6.04 | 5.84 | 6.28 | −0.89 | −1.09 | −0.65 |
| SD | 2.02 | 2.38 | 2.22 | 1.95 | 1.44 | 1.51 | 1.22 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 6.77 | 5.73 | 4.74 | 4.55 † | −1.04 | −1.87 | −2.22 * | |
| 500 mg | SD | 2.49 | 2.89 | 2.62 | 2.66 | 1.43 | 1.69 | 3.08 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 7.35 | 5.50 | 5.47 | 4.66 † | −1.85 | −1.88 | −2.69 * | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 1.19 | 2.34 | 2.22 | 2.47 | 1.85 | 2.29 | 2.31 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 7.65 | 5.04 | 4.98 | 4.24 * | −2.61 ** | −2.67 | −3.41 *** | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 1.50 | 2.52 | 2.50 | 2.37 | 1.75 | 1.93 | 2.26 | ||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test) | 0.6878 | 0.5877 | 0.5464 | 0.0492 * | 0.0040 ** | 0.1027 | 0.0014 ** | |||
*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo intake group. VAS: visual Analog Scale.
Table 8.
Summary of OSA analysis on Sleepiness on rising, Refreshing, and Sleep length. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a session x group interaction (p = 0.054, p = 0.016, p = 0.003) and a main effect of group (p = 0.052, p = 0.089, p = 0.780), therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo group and Euglena intake group at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Table 8.
Summary of OSA analysis on Sleepiness on rising, Refreshing, and Sleep length. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a session x group interaction (p = 0.054, p = 0.016, p = 0.003) and a main effect of group (p = 0.052, p = 0.089, p = 0.780), therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo group and Euglena intake group at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
| Group | n | 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | Δ 4 Weeks | Δ 8 Weeks | Δ 12 Weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleepiness on rising | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 41.8 | 40.6 | 41.5 | 41.4 | −1.2 | −0.3 | −0.4 |
| SD | 7.0 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 6.0 | 3.4 | 5.9 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 42.1 | 43.4 | 47.7 * | 48.9 * | 1.3 | 5.3 * | 6.7 * | |
| 500 mg | SD | 9.1 | 6.9 | 9.0 | 10.8 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 8.6 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 38.1 | 41.2 | 43.6 | 43.5 | 3.1 | 5.5 * | 5.4 † | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 3.3 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 5.7 | 7.4 | 8.2 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 42.7 | 44.5 | 44.7 | 48.3 * | 1.9 | 2.1 | 5.7 † | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 6.5 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 10.2 | ||
| Refreshing | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 41.2 | 41.5 | 41.1 | 41.6 | 0.3 | −0.2 | 0.3 |
| SD | 7.6 | 6.7 | 4.7 | 7.0 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 6.4 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 43.2 | 42.0 | 47.0 † | 48.4 * | −1.2 | 3.6 | 5.2 | |
| 500 mg | SD | 5.7 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 9.7 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 37.3 | 42.0 | 43.9 | 44.1 | 4.8 | 6.7 * | 6.8 † | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 5.4 | 7.8 | 7.6 | 8.9 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 9.6 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 38.9 | 44.5 | 45.4 | 49.0 * | 5.5 | 6.5 † | 10.1 * | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 6.9 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 8.8 | ||
| Sleep length | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 43.5 | 47.7 | 44.1 | 44.5 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| SD | 8.2 | 8.4 | 8.9 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 5.8 | 6.5 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 46.4 | 42.5 | 46.8 | 51.3 † | −3.8 * | 0.2 | 4.9 | |
| 500 mg | SD | 6.9 | 13.9 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 12.2 | 7.3 | 9.9 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 42.7 | 43.9 | 47.2 | 46.3 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 3.6 | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 6.4 | 8.1 | 10.9 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 11.2 | 9.5 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 40.8 | 45.2 | 49.1 | 50.7 † | 4.4 | 8.3 * | 9.9 ** | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 9.4 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 10.9 | 8.0 | 10.7 | 7.7 |
** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo intake group. OSA: Ogri-Shirakawa-Azumi Sleep Inventory.
Table 9.
Analysis of sleep based on PSQI. After accounting for normality, Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Steel’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo group and Euglena intake groups at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Table 9.
Analysis of sleep based on PSQI. After accounting for normality, Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant, the Steel’s test was then performed. Steel’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo group and Euglena intake groups at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
| Group | n | 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total score | Placebo | 18 | Mean | 7.7 | 7.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 |
| SD | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 | |||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 8.1 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 5.7 | |
| 500 mg | SD | 3.1 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 2.3 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 7.4 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 4.7 † | |
| 1000 mg | SD | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 | ||
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 6.8 | 5.1 * | 4.9 | 4.2 * | |
| 3000 mg | SD | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 | ||
| p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test) | 0.5557 | 0.0803 † | 0.2304 | 0.0243 * | |||
* p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo intake group. PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Table 10.
Correct answer rates (%) for the Uchida–Kraepelin test. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a main effect of group (p = 0.098) in “First half;” therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo group and Euglena intake groups at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Table 10.
Correct answer rates (%) for the Uchida–Kraepelin test. After accounting for normality, a two-way repeated measure ANOVA was performed. The results showed a main effect of group (p = 0.098) in “First half;” therefore, we followed up with post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s test. Dunnett’s test was used for intergroup comparisons of mean values in the placebo group and Euglena intake groups at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
| 0 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | First Half | Latter Half | First Half | Latter Half | First Half | Latter Half | First Half | Latter Half | |
| Placebo | 18 | Mean | 98.7 | 98.8 | 98.9 | 98.7 | 98.7 | 99.0 | 98.6 | 98.7 |
| SD | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | ||
| Euglena | 19 | Mean | 98.7 | 99.1 | 99.1 | 99.2 | 99.3 † | 99.2 | 99.3 | 99.2 |
| 500 mg | SD | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | |
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 99.2 | 99.2 | 99.3 | 99.2 | 99.6 ** | 99.5 | 99.5 * | 99.4 |
| 1000 mg | SD | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
| Euglena | 20 | Mean | 99.1 | 99.0 | 99.0 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 99.4 † | 99.4 |
| 3000 mg | SD | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | |
** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p < 0.1 vs. the placebo intake group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Nakashima, A.; Yasuda, K.; Murata, A.; Suzuki, K.; Miura, N. Effects of Euglena gracilis Intake on Mood and Autonomic Activity under Mental Workload, and Subjective Sleep Quality: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3243. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113243
AMA Style
Nakashima A, Yasuda K, Murata A, Suzuki K, Miura N. Effects of Euglena gracilis Intake on Mood and Autonomic Activity under Mental Workload, and Subjective Sleep Quality: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11):3243. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113243
Chicago/Turabian StyleNakashima, Ayaka, Kosuke Yasuda, Ako Murata, Kengo Suzuki, and Naoki Miura. 2020. "Effects of Euglena gracilis Intake on Mood and Autonomic Activity under Mental Workload, and Subjective Sleep Quality: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial" Nutrients 12, no. 11: 3243. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113243
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
