Next Article in Journal
The Role of Diet on Insulin Sensitivity
Next Article in Special Issue
Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid Status during Pregnancy and Its Impact on Infant Neurodevelopment
Previous Article in Journal
Dairy Consumption and Metabolic Health
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/nu12103041
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Supplementation on Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 Months in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial

by
Shweta Khandelwal
1,2,*,
Dimple Kondal
1,2,
Monica Chaudhry
1,
Kamal Patil
3,
Mallaiah Kenchaveeraiah Swamy
3,
Deepa Metgud
4,
Sandesh Jogalekar
3,
Mahesh Kamate
3,
Gauri Divan
5,6,
Ruby Gupta
1,2,
Dorairaj Prabhakaran
1,2,
Nikhil Tandon
7,
Usha Ramakrishnan
8 and
Aryeh D. Stein
8
1
Public Health Foundation of India, 47, Sector 44, Institutional area, Gurugram, Haryana 122003, India
2
Centre for Chronic Disease Control, C-1/52, 2nd Floor, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi 110016, India
3
KAHER’s JN Medical College, JNMC KLE University Campus, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka 590010, India
4
KAHER’s Institute of Physiotherapy, JNMC KLE University Campus, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka 590010, India
5
Sangath, C-1/52, Block C 1, Bhim Nagri, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
6
Sangath Goa, H No 451 (168), Bhatkar Waddo, Socorro, Porvorium, Bardez, Goa 403501, India
7
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi 110029, India
8
Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(10), 3041; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103041
Submission received: 14 August 2020 / Revised: 22 September 2020 / Accepted: 23 September 2020 / Published: 3 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maternal DHA Impact on Child Neurodevelopment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Intake of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA 22:6n-3) is very low among Indian pregnant women. Maternal supplementation during pregnancy and lactation may benefit offspring neurodevelopment. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of supplementing pregnant Indian women (singleton gestation) from ≤20 weeks through 6 months postpartum with 400 mg/d algal DHA compared to placebo on neurodevelopment of their offspring at 12 months. Of 3379 women screened, 1131 were found eligible; 957 were randomized. The primary outcome was infant neurodevelopment at 12 months, assessed using the Development Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII). Both groups were well balanced on sociodemographic variables at baseline. More than 72% of women took >90% of their assigned treatment. Twenty-five serious adverse events (SAEs), none related to the intervention, (DHA group = 16; placebo = 9) were noted. Of 902 live births, 878 were followed up to 12 months; the DASII was administered to 863 infants. At 12 months, the mean development quotient (DQ) scores in the DHA and placebo groups were not statistically significant (96.6 ± 12.2 vs. 97.1 ± 13.0, p = 0.60). Supplementing mothers through pregnancy and lactation with 400 mg/d DHA did not impact offspring neurodevelopment at 12 months of age in this setting.

1. Introduction

The first 1000 days are crucial for a child’s neurodevelopment [1]. The brain develops rapidly through neurogenesis, axonal and dendritic growth, synaptogenesis, synaptic pruning, myelination, and gliogenesis [2]. These events build on each other, such that even small perturbations can have long-term effects on the brain’s structural and functional capacity [3]. Maternal nutrition during this time influences both pre- and postnatal growth, and development of the offspring [4,5,6].
It has been suggested that n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA) (especially docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) levels enhance infant neurodevelopment [7,8,9,10,11]. The DHA is an important structural component of the human brain and retina. DHA accumulates in all of the brain regions and retinal photoreceptors [12]. These long-chain fatty acids regulate the fluidity of cell membranes as well as the activity of ion channels, enabling synaptic transmission and providing substrate binding to membrane receptors. The deposition of DHA in human brain phospholipids occurs primarily during the last trimester of pregnancy such as week 30 until the early postnatal periods continuing during the first two years of life [13,14,15]. Human fetuses and young infants have limited ability to synthesize n-3 LCPUFA de novo and are supplied via maternal (placental transfer, breast milk) or external (formula, dietary) sources [16,17]. Approximately 67 mg of DHA is accrued by the fetus per day [18]. Deprivation of n-3 LCPUFA, whether prenatally or after birth, has deleterious effects on learning abilities, memory, and visual grating acuity in monkeys, rats, and human infants [19,20].
DHA can be obtained from marine algae, fatty fish, and marine oils. Endogenous synthesis of DHA is limited, especially in the presence of excess n-6 LCPUFA. The Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) Expert Committee recommends a diet with a 5–10:1 ratio of n-6/n-3 LCPUFA and 300 mg/day of preformed DHA during pregnancy [21,22]. Since cereal-based diets are rich in n-6 LCPUFA but largely deficient in DHA-rich sources, population levels of plasma DHA are low in India. Studies report [23,24] that mean DHA intake was lowest (11 mg) among Indian pregnant women in the third trimester [25] compared to pregnant women from other developing countries like Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Chile, China, India, and Mexico.
Studies conducted around the world to assess the association between intakes of DHA during pregnancy or lactation and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood have been inconsistent [7,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Few studies have assessed the effect of both prenatal and postnatal intake of DHA [36,37]. There is a paucity of data on the potential benefits of maternal DHA supplementation in infants, especially in the Indian population. The present study examines the hypothesis whether 400 mg/d maternal DHA supplementation from ≤20 weeks through 6 months postpartum influences infant neurodevelopment at 12 months of age. The present study DHANI (Maternal DHA supplementation and offspring Neurodevelopment in India) is the first to examine the effects of maternal DHA supplementation from mid-pregnancy through six months postpartum on postnatal neurodevelopment in India.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

DHANI was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the effect of providing pregnant women 400 mg/d algal DHA compared to placebo from ≤20 weeks of singleton gestation through 6 months postpartum on offspring neurodevelopment. The trial protocol has been published elsewhere [38]. The protocol was reviewed and approved by institutional review boards (IRBs) of all participating institutions: Center for Chronic Disease Control (CCDC-IEC_04_2015), Public Health Foundation of India (TRC-IEC-261/15), Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (MDC/IECHSR/2016-17/A-85), and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IEC-28/17.11.2015).

2.2. Participants

Healthy pregnant women (18–35 years; ≤20 weeks single gestation; with no medical complications or chronic diseases) attending the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Prabhakar Kore hospital (PKH) in a large city in southwest India for their prenatal check-ups were approached by designated project staff. The consulting obstetrician on site, considering obstetric history and complications, affirmed final eligibility. After signing a witnessed informed consent form in their preferred local language (Kannada, Marathi, or Hindi), consenting women (n = 957) were randomized to receive either 400 mg of DHA or a placebo until six months postpartum as explained later. Baseline assessments at enrollment included sociodemographic characteristics, dietary intake, obstetric history, anthropometric measurements, blood investigations including a non-fasting blood draw, vital signs. The women received their first 15-day supply of supplements in the form of coded bottles. Further supplements were provided at the women’s homes every fortnight by fieldworkers.
The next study hospital visit was at delivery (referred to as E0). A research officer stayed in close contact with each mother after she entered her last trimester and visited the mother within 24 h of delivery to collect information on the type of delivery, complications if any, and newborn anthropometry, and obtained a breast milk sample. We also collected and stored maternal and cord blood samples from the enrolled mother–child dyads.
Postpartum visits for mother–child dyads at 1 month (E1), at 6 months (E6), and at 12 months (E12) postpartum were scheduled. E1 data collection (neonatal anthropometry, maternal anthropometry, breastfeeding pattern, breast milk sample (transported to site in ice box), overall health of both mother and child, etc.) was carried out at home by trained fieldworkers. Infant neurodevelopment was assessed at the hospital at E6 and E12 by trained and certified psychologists.
A pre-piloted and validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with n-3 LCPUFA-rich Indian foods was administered to all women at enrollment. Dietary data were also collected in a subsample of women (n = 278) using a 24-h diet recall within 1 month of recruitment. Nutrient intakes were calculated using DIETSOFT software (http://dietsoft.in/) based on standardized nutritive values of Indian foods [39]. A study physician reviewed adverse events.

2.3. Randomization and Masking

A computer-generated randomization using a permuted block design was used to generate the randomization list. The code list was generated for 1200 women to allow for potential loss to follow up. The assignment code list was placed in a sealed envelope at the beginning of the study and was held in a sealed location by a staff member at Gurugram, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI). This list was used by this person to pre-code the supplement bottles in the warehouse before the bottles arrived on site, ready for distribution. All study participants and members of the study team (including members at the study site) remained blinded to the treatment allocation until the analysis of all data collected was carried out. Blinded preliminary descriptive analyses were presented to Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and once approved, full statistical analyses were undertaken. Unblinding occurred only after primary tables were generated.
The intervention was either 400 mg/d algal DHA or a matching placebo (soy/corn oil) delivered in the form of similar-looking softgel capsules, donated by DSM Nutritional Supplements, Mumbai. The composition of all capsules was same except for the DHA. Enrolled women received the intervention from the date of randomization until six months postpartum.
The shelf life of the capsules at room temperature (25 °C) was 24 months from the date of manufacture (90 days once the bottle was opened). The coded capsule bottles were stored in an on-site refrigerator for extra safety to slow down oxidation. Each bottle contained a fortnightly supply of capsules. Bottles were distributed by fieldworkers during scheduled home visits. The women were instructed to take two capsules (each with 200 mg DHA or placebo) daily, preferably at the same time each day. They were told to keep them in a cool, dry place. Supplements were provided for more than two weeks in cases where the woman shared plans to travel.

2.4. Procedures

Subjects were asked to maintain a daily record in an easy-to-fill log (piloted and found suitable for population with low literacy levels) of their supplement consumption. Weekly calls were made to encourage compliance and inquire about the general well-being of the women. The used bottles were collected (for pill count) by the fieldworkers during the fortnightly home visits. Red blood cell (RBC) phospholipids were analyzed for DHA levels. The analyses of breast milk samples have not been presented here.

2.5. Outcomes

Development quotient (DQ) as a marker of neurodevelopment, among infants at 12 months of age, was assessed by a trained psychologist using the Developmental Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII). The DASII tool is the Indian modification of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), using Indian norms for 67 motor and 163 mental items. DASII provides a measure of development for Indian infants below 30 months of age. DQ is defined as the ratio of functional to chronological age. Third, 50th and 97th percentile norms have been generated for Indian children (DQ range of 35–160 ± 3.5). The maximum DQ score is 160. In terms of interpretation of scores, DQ score ≥85 is normal and 71–84 is mild to moderate delay. Severe developmental delay is defined on DASII as DQ score ≤70 (≤2 SD). The inter-correlation between the motor and mental performance on the two sections of the scale ranges from 0.24 to 0.62 [40]. The motor development items cover the child’s development from supine to erect posture, neck control, locomotion, and manipulative behavior such as reaching, picking up, handling things, and so forth. The mental development items record the child’s cognizance of objects in the surroundings, perceptual pursuit of moving objects, development of communication and language comprehension, spatial relationship and manual dexterity, imitative behavior, social interaction, and so forth.

2.6. Biomarkers

Fatty acid composition of plasma phospholipids and red blood cell (RBC) membrane phospholipids are appropriate biomarkers of fatty acid status and related to dietary intakes [41,42]. Since the plasma (reflecting short-term intake) and RBC (reflecting long-term intake) fatty acid composition are related, the markers of longer-term intake RBC phospholipid fatty acids (linoleic acid (18:2n-6); alpha-linolenic acid (18:3n-3); arachidonic acid (20:4n-6); eicosapentanoic acid (20:5n-3); DHA (22:6n-3)) were measured. Lipids were extracted from RBCs using the method of Rose and Ocklander [43], phospholipids were separated by thin-layer chromatography. The phospholipids were trans-esterified using the method by Lepage and Roy [44] and fatty acids were identified by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector. Thirty-seven fatty acid methyl ester mix from Supelco (SIGMA-ALDRICH) was used to identify the fatty acids using their retention time.
Maternal nonfasting blood samples (5 mL) were obtained by venipuncture at recruitment, delivery, and six months postpartum. Neonatal blood samples were obtained from the umbilical cord vein immediately after delivery using the syringe method. A 2 mL venous blood sample was obtained from infants at 6 and 12 months of age. All samples were collected into tubes containing disodium ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA). Plasma was separated the same day by cold centrifugation (4 °C) at 800× g for 10 min and RBCs were washed thrice using equal volumes of saline. Plasma and washed RBCs were stored at −80 °C for later analysis.
Breast milk samples (one day, one month, and six months postpartum) were collected. The milk samples were from a morning feed but not the first one, preferably between 08:00 am and 12:00 pm. Infants were allowed to suckle the nipple for a few minutes, and then a breast milk sample (10 mL) was expressed manually by the mother herself, after which the feeding continued. The samples were refrigerated immediately to prevent bacterial growth and later aliquoted into smaller 2 mL containers, filled nearly to the top to minimize oxidation, and frozen at −80 °C until analysis. Although the amount of fat may change within and between feeds, the proportion of fatty acid remains relatively constant. Since breast milk PUFA were being expressed as a percent of total fatty acids, complete breast expressions were not required [45]. RBC phospholipids were analyzed by gas chromatography using standard methods.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The primary study outcome was infant development quotient (DQ) score (composite score of motor and mental development) obtained at 12 months of age. We required 674 mother–child pairs to detect an effect size of 0.25 with 90% power [46].
Maternal household and offspring characteristics in the two treatment groups were summarized to assess the effectiveness of randomization. Continuous, normally distributed variables were summarized as means and standard deviations, while skewed variables were summarized as medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical/binary variables were summarized using proportions. Analysis was done using the intent to treat (ITT) principle. Per protocol analyses were also carried out including infants who had a valid 12-month DQ score (DASII test administered at 12 months postpartum ± 4 weeks) and whose mothers’ compliance rate >80%. All protocol deviation cases were excluded from per protocol analyses. We compared baseline characteristics between the final study sample and those who were lost to follow-up.
For the primary outcome, we used a two-sample t test to compare the mean DQ (mental and motor) score at 12 months between the DHA and placebo group using DASII. We performed the subgroup analysis using a two-sample t-test for the difference in mean DQ score between DHA and placebo group stratified by pre-specified subgroups, that is, mother’s age (18–20, 21–25, 26–30, 31–35 years), mother’s BMI (<18, 18.0–22.9, 23.0–24.9, ≥25 kg/m2), gravidity (multigravida, primigravida), gestational age at delivery (<37, ≥37 weeks), duration of supplementation (≤10, 10.1–12.0, ≥12.1 months), vegetarian diet (yes, no), physical activity (inactive/low, moderate, high), and gender of the child (male, female). The p-value for interaction was calculated by including the interaction term between the characteristic of interest and treatment group in the linear regression model. Heterogeneity was assessed based on the significance of the interaction term between the characteristic of interest and treatment (p < 0.05). All the statistical analysis was done using STATA 16.0 version (College Station, TX, USA) and R 3.6.2 version.

3. Results

Enrollment began in January 2016 and ended in August 2017. Figure 1 shows the CONSORT flow chart. We screened 3379 women for eligibility and found 1131 to be eligible. A total of 957 mothers were enrolled and randomized (DHA = 478; Placebo = 479). Of the 902 live births, 878 were followed to 12 months and the DASII was administered to 863 of those. Loss to follow-up (8.2% from randomization through 12 months) and mean ± SD compliance did not differ by group (DHA: 93.0 ± 10.1; Placebo: 92.7 ± 10.7). Baseline maternal and household characteristics were similar by treatment group (Table 1). Overall, the mean age of the mothers was 23.9 (3.6) years, the mean BMI of the participating women was 20.6 ± 3.6 kg/m2, and the mean hemoglobin was 11.1 ± 1.3 gm/L. Based on the semiquantitative FFQ administered at baseline, the dietary intake of n-3-rich foods was similar across the two groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between those who completed the study and those who did not complete the study (Table S1).
The proportion of live births was similar across both the groups (DHA vs. Placebo: 94.1% vs. 94.3%) (Table 2). Initiation of breastfeeding in 1 h did not differ across groups (DHA vs. Placebo: 79.9% vs. 81.7%) (Table 3).
The age at which complementary feeding started was similar across groups (DHA vs. Placebo, mean ± SD: 5.4 ± 0.67 vs. 5.3 ± 0.83 months) (Table 3).
The maternal RBC DHA concentrations (mol % of fatty acid) (mean ± SD) were not different between the groups at baseline (DHA; 0.86 ± 0.78, Placebo: 0.88 ± 0.71) but significantly higher in the DHA group compared to placebo group at delivery (DHA: 1.94 ± 1.42, Placebo: 0.84 ± 0.56; p < 0.001) (Table 4).
In the placebo group, there was no change in RBC DHA concentrations over the period of intervention while in the DHA group, concentrations increased by 1.04 (0.86, 1.23) mol % of fatty acid, paired t-test, p < 0.001.
The DQ score (mean ± SD) at 12 months for the DHA and placebo groups was 96.6 ± 12.2 and 97.1 ± 13.0, respectively, and the mean difference (placebo minus DHA) was 0.46 (95% CI: −1.23, 2.14; p = 0.60). The motor and mental scores also did not differ significantly across the groups at 12 months (Table 5). There were 25 serious adverse events, all determined to be unrelated to intervention (DHA group = 16; placebo = 9; p = 0.154) (Table S2). The last 12-month assessment (including DASII) was conducted in early April 2019.
The per protocol analysis also showed no difference in 12-month DQ scores between the two groups (Table S3). The mean infant DQ, mental and motor scores at six months did not differ significantly across groups (secondary outcomes not shown in this paper). The mean DQ score did not differ significantly across mother’s age group, BMI, gravida, gestation age at delivery, compliance rate, duration of supplementation, physical activity (Figure 2).
However, the mean DQ score for female child was higher in placebo as compared to DHA [mean difference (placebo− DHA) (95% CI): 2.74 (0.40, 5.09)]. The p-value for interaction was significant for gender of the child (p = 0.013). The pre- and postnatal maternal supplementation with 400 mg/d DHA did not improve the infant’s DQ score as measured by DASII at 12 months of age.

4. Discussion

In this well designed and executed RCT (CONSORT checklist enclosed as Table S4), pre- and postnatal maternal supplementation with 400 mg/d DHA did not improve the infant’s development score as measured by DASII at 12 months of age. Our findings are in accordance with some other trials [46,47,48,49]. The reviews published so far in this field to understand the association between maternal DHA supplementation and infant neurodevelopment have also reported the evidence of a positive association between maternal DHA supplementation and infant neurodevelopment to be either too low or inconsistent, with a majority of the RCTs showing no positive effect [36]. Makrides et al. provided 800 mg/d and [50] showed no difference in children’s cognitive scores between the intervention and control group at 18 months. Similarly, Helland et al. [49] found no effect of prenatal supplementation with cod liver oil on cognitive development among 288 three-month-old children in Norway. On the other hand, the randomized trial of Colombo et al. [51] found that lower doses of DHA supplementation of the infants (4 to 9 months of age) showed better cognitive outcomes in terms of their attention span. Studies have reported maternal DHA status in pregnancy to be positively associated with infant’s brain volume at 1 month [52], improved infant’s attention [53], and enhanced problem-solving skills at 12 months [54]. Rees et al. [26] showed that the infants of mothers who had a higher dietary DHA intake during the second and third trimesters of their pregnancy performed better on cognitive assessment measures (habituation and sustained visual attention) at 4.5 and 9 months of age. However, it was also observed that the infants from the medium dietary DHA group [0.64% of fatty acids from DHA (34 mg/100 kcal)] performed significantly better than the low-DHA [0.32% (17 mg/100 kcal)] and high-DHA group [0.96% (51 mg/100 kcal)], with the latter showing the worst performance [26,51]. Additionally, some studies have reported improved cognition among older children whose mothers were supplemented with 400–600 mg/d DHA prenatally, after they turned four years old [27,30,35].
The neurodevelopment in the current study was assessed with the help of the DASII test which is BSID’s adaptation. Although BSID is a global standardized test for assessing cognitive functioning and has been frequently utilized in neurodevelopment effects of LCPUFA in infants [55], its sensitivity to pick up some subtle differences in infant cognitive ability has been questioned [56]. Experts suggest that differences in intellectual functioning that are sensitive to pathways influenced by n-3 fatty acids may only be detected with more sensitive measures of neurodevelopment such as neuroimaging techniques [57], neuropsychological testing [58], distinct cognitive abilities, or executive functioning [59]. The suitability of these approaches for large field-based trials in low resource settings warrants further exploration.
Few possible limitations of our single-center trial may include lack of details on home environment and detailed dietary data on the children which may have influenced the neurodevelopment in the first year of life. The measure of neurodevelopment used in the study (i.e., the DQ score) has not been validated against the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) which is currently considered the gold standard noninvasive hemodynamic-based neuroimaging technology. The fatty acid composition of the blood and breast milk collected from the enrolled women are not currently available. We also did not estimate dietary n-3 LCPUFA intakes in all the study subjects; however, the biomarker (RBC phospholipid DHA) is very responsive to intake and was measured at both enrollment and immediately after birth as an indicator of prior status and study DHA intake. Further, other fatty acids like AA and DHA:AA ratios may play a key role in neurodevelopment [60]. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first one to examine the effects of in utero and early-life DHA exposure (through maternal supplementation from mid-pregnancy through six months postpartum) on postnatal neurodevelopment of Indian infants. Through a long supplementation phase and follow-up period, the participants of our trial reported good compliance and very low attrition. Genetic predisposition, prenatal and postnatal care and nutrition, and social and physical environment may all be critical in shaping the neurodevelopment of an infant. We collected maternal dietary data at baseline but not at later visits. Changes throughout the pregnancy with respect to not only n-3 LCPUFA but also other nutrients such as vitamin D or iron [61,62] may affect offspring neurodevelopment.
While DHA is a key intrinsic factor constituting more than 40% of brain polyunsaturated fatty acids [63,64], external factors like care and stimulation in the home environment also play a significant role in a child’s cognitive development [65,66]. Poor physical conditions of home and limited access to age-appropriate learning materials have been linked with social–emotional problems in children. Ramakrishnan et al. [46] indicated a possible attenuating effect of DHA on the positive association between home environment and psychomotor development. DHA may be especially helpful for children living in home environments characterized by reduced caregiver interactions and opportunities for early childhood stimulation [67]. It might have been useful to have these data in the present study. Further, the mean DQ score of girl children in the placebo group was higher. This inconsistency may be due to chance. Some studies also attribute gender-related differences in neurodevelopment to sex hormones [68] and/or social context [69], but since these were not assessed in our trial, we cannot be certain of this.
In summary, supplementing mothers through pregnancy and lactation with 400 mg/d DHA (vs. placebo) did not benefit offspring neurodevelopment at one year of age in this Indian setting. Deeper insights into maternal dietary patterns, young child feeding practices, home environment, and the interactions amongst these factors are warranted to understand what shapes early neurodevelopment.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/10/3041/s1, Table S1: Comparison of baseline characteristics of those who completed the study and those who did not, Table S2: Listing of serious adverse events by group, Table S3: Primary outcome (per protocol analysis), Table S4: CONSORT checklist.

Author Contributions

S.K. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. She also takes the final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Conceptualization, S.K., D.P., N.T., U.R., and A.D.S.; Data curation, D.K.; Formal analysis, D.K. and R.G.; Funding acquisition, S.K. and D.P.; Investigation, S.K., D.M., and S.J.; Methodology, U.R.; Project administration, S.K., M.C., and K.P.; Resources, K.P., M.K.S., and D.P.; Software, D.K.; Supervision, K.P., M.K.S., M.K., N.T., and A.D.S.; Validation, R.G.; Writing—original draft, S.K.; Writing—review & editing, M.C., G.D., D.P., N.T., U.R., and A.D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This trial is funded by DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance (India Alliance) (December 2015–December 2020) via Grant number IA/CPHE/14/1/501498. The Young Scientist Award by DST SERB India (2013–16) via grant number SR/FT/LS-156/2011 helped us establish a part of the DHANI trial cohort. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Trial Registration—ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03072277; Ctri.nic.in Identifier CTRI/2017/08/009296.

Acknowledgments

The trial’s mentoring advisory committee (MAC) chairs Professors Reynaldo Martorell (Emory University, Atlanta) and K Srinath Reddy (PHFI, India) have provided overall guidance at each stage and we are extremely grateful for that. All other members of the MAC also made significant contributions in the conduct of the study. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at KAHER’s JN Medical College (JNMC) Belagavi is deeply acknowledged. The Unit Chiefs (M. B. Bellad, Anita Dalal, Yeshita Pujar, and M. C. Metgud) deserve a special mention in providing valuable inputs and support during each phase of this study. We are indebted to the JNMC’s Blood Bank in-charge Mr. Shrikant Viragi and his whole team for facilitating all onsite biochemical work in the study. The efforts and diligence of IRBs of all participating institutions are also acknowledged. We express sincere gratitude to the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) chaired by Prof Vinod Paul (Niti Aayog, India). We are truly grateful to the resource and support teams at Centre for Chronic Disease Control (CCDC) and Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Delhi. The active ingredient DHA-S (also known as ‘DHA algal oil’) is a naturally occurring, microalgal oil derived from Schizochytrium sp. Each active 635 mg softgel provided ~200 mg DHA (total daily DHA = 400 mg/d) and a 50/50 corn oil and soybean oil blend was used for the placebo softgels (DSM Nutritional Products, Columbia, MD, USA. Neither the product provider nor the sponsors had an opportunity to review a presubmission copy of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Sharing Statement

The request for accessing de-identified data plus data dictionary will be put forth for approval by the trial’s mentoring and advisory committee (MAC). Interested researchers may submit a proposal with a valid reason or justification (e.g., meta-analysis, etc.).

References

  1. Grantham-McGregor, S.; Cheung, Y.B.; Cueto, S.; Glewwe, P.; Richter, L.; Strupp, B. International Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 2007, 369, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jiang, X.; Nardelli, J. Cellular and molecular introduction to brain development. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016, 92 Pt A, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cusick, S.; Georgieff, M.K. The Role of Nutrition in Brain Development: The Golden Opportunity of the “First 1000 Days”. J. Pediatr. 2016, 175, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Costello, A.M.D.L.; Osrin, D. Micronutrient Status during Pregnancy and Outcomes for Newborn Infants in Developing Countries. J. Nutr. 2003, 133 (Suppl. 2), 1757S–1764S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Larqué, E.; Demmelmair, H.; Koletzko, B. Perinatal supply and metabolism of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: Importance for the early development of the nervous system. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 2002, 967, 299–310. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rahmanifar, A.; Kirksey, A.; Wachs, T.D.; McCabe, G.P.; Bishry, Z.; Galal, O.M.; Harrison, G.G.; Jerome, N.W. Diet during lactation associated with infant behavior and caregiver-infant interaction in a semirural Egyptian village. J. Nutr. 1993, 123, 164–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Meldrum, S.; Karen, S. Docosahexaenoic Acid and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Term Infants. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 69 (Suppl. 1), 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Makrides, M. DHA supplementation during the perinatal period and neurodevelopment: Do some babies benefit more than others? Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2013, 88, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ryan, A.S.; Astwood, J.D.; Gautier, S.; Kuratko, C.N.; Nelson, E.B.; Salem, N. Effects of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on neurodevelopment in childhood: A review of human studies. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2010, 82, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Makrides, M.; Smithers, L.G.; Gibson, R. Role of Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Neurodevelopment and Growth. Nestle Nutr. Workshop Ser. Pediatr Program 2010, 65, 123–136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hibbeln, J.R.; Davis, J.M.; Steer, C.; Emmett, P.; Rogers, I.; Williams, C.; Golding, J. Maternal seafood consumption in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood (ALSPAC study): An observational cohort study. Lancet 2007, 369, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Monograph. Altern. Med. Rev. 2009, 14, 391–399. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lauritzen, L.; Brambilla, P.; Mazzocchi, A.; Harsløf, L.B.S.; Ciappolino, V.; Agostoni, C. DHA Effects in Brain Development and Function. Nutrents 2016, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Carlson, S.E. Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in pregnancy and lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 678s–684s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Makrides, M.; Gibson, R. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71 (Suppl. 1), 307S–311S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Koletzko, B.; Boey, C.C.; Campoy, C.; Carlson, S.E.; Chang, N.; Guillermo-Tuazon, M.A.; Joshi, S.; Prell, C.; Quak, S.H.; Sjarif, D.R.; et al. Current Information and Asian Perspectives on Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Pregnancy, Lactation, and Infancy: Systematic Review and Practice Recommendations from an Early Nutrition Academy Workshop. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2014, 65, 49–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Weiser, M.J.; Butt, C.M.; Mohajeri, M.H. Docosahexaenoic Acid and Cognition throughout the Lifespan. Nutrients 2016, 8, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garg, P.; Pejaver, R.K.; Sukhija, M.; Ahuja, A. Role of DHA, ARA, & phospholipids in brain development: An Indian perspective. Clin. Epidemiology Glob. Health 2017, 5, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Brenna, J.T. Animal studies of the functional consequences of suboptimal polyunsaturated fatty acid status during pregnancy, lactation and early post-natal life. Matern. Child Nutr. 2011, 7 (Suppl. 2), 59–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wadhwani, N.; Patil, V.; Joshi, S.R. Maternal long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status and pregnancy complications. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2018, 136, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wierzejska, R.; Jarosz, M.; Wojda, B.; Siuba-Strzelińska, M. Dietary intake of DHA during pregnancy: A significant gap between the actual intake and current nutritional recommendations. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny 2018, 69, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Grieger, J.A.; Etherton, T.D. Dietary reference intakes for DHA and EPA. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2009, 81, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huffman, S.L.; Harika, R.K.; Eilander, A.; Osendarp, S.J. Essential fats: How do they affect growth and development of infants and young children in developing countries? A literature review. Matern. Child Nutr. 2011, 7 (Suppl. 3), 44–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shrimpton, R.; Huffman, S.L.; Zehner, E.R.; Darnton-Hill, I.; Dalmiya, N. Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation during Pregnancy in Developing-Country Settings: Policy and Program Implications of the Results of a Meta-Analysis. Food Nutr. Bull. 2009, 30 (Suppl. 4), S556–S573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muthayya, S.; Dwarkanath, P.; Thomas, T.; Ramprakash, S.; Mehra, R.; Mhaskar, A.; Mhaskar, R.; Thomas, A.; Bhat, S.; Vaz, M.; et al. The effect of fish and ω-3 LCPUFA intake on low birth weight in Indian pregnant women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rees, A.; Sirois, S.; Wearden, A. Prenatal maternal docosahexaenoic acid intake and infant information processing at 4.5mo and 9mo: A longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Colombo, J.; Shaddy, D.J.; Gustafson, K.M.; Gajewski, B.J.; Thodosoff, J.M.; Kerling, E.H.; Carlson, S.E. The Kansas University DHA Outcomes Study (KUDOS) clinical trial: Long-term behavioral follow-up of the effects of prenatal DHA supplementation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 109, 1380–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Argaw, A.; Huybregts, L.; Wondafrash, M.; Kolsteren, P.; Belachew, T.; Worku, B.N.; Abessa, T.G.; Bouckaert, K.P. Neither n-3 Long-Chain PUFA Supplementation of Mothers through Lactation nor of Offspring in a Complementary Food Affects Child. Overall or Social-Emotional Development: A 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Ethiopia. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gould, J.F.; Yelland, L.N.; Smithers, L.G.; Makrides, M.; Treyvaud, K.; Anderson, V.; McPhee, A. Seven-Year Follow-up of Children Born to Women in a Randomized Trial of Prenatal DHA Supplementation. JAMA 2017, 317, 1173–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ramakrishnan, U.; Gonzalez-Casanova, I.; Schnaas, L.; DiGirolamo, A.; Quezada, A.D.; Pallo, B.C.; Hao, W.; Neufeld, L.M.; Rivera, J.A.; Stein, A.D.; et al. Prenatal supplementation with DHA improves attention at 5 y of age: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Makrides, M.; Gould, J.F.; Gawlik, N.R.; Yelland, L.N.; Smithers, L.G.; Anderson, P.J.; Gibson, R.A. Four-Year Follow-up of Children Born to Women in a Randomized Trial of Prenatal DHA Supplementation. JAMA 2014, 311, 1802–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carlson, S.E.; Colombo, J.; Gajewski, B.J.; Gustafson, K.M.; Mundy, D.; Yeast, J.; Georgieff, M.K.; Markley, L.A.; Kerling, E.H.; Shaddy, D.J. DHA supplementation and pregnancy outcomes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Escolano-Margarit, M.V.; Ramos, R.; Beyer, J.; Csábi, G.; Parrilla-Roure, M.; Cruz, F.; Pérez-García, M.; Hadders-Algra, M.; Gil, Á; Decsi, T.; et al. Prenatal DHA Status and Neurological Outcome in Children at Age 5.5 Years Are Positively Associated. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 1216–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ramakrishnan, U.; Stein, A.D.; Parra-Cabrera, S.; Wang, M.; Imhoff-Kunsch, B.; Juárez-Márquez, S.; Rivera, J.; Martorell, R. Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation During Pregnancy on Gestational Age and Size at Birth: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Mexico. Food Nutr. Bull. 2010, 31, S108–S116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gustafson, K.M.; Liao, K.; Mathis, N.B.; Shaddy, D.J.; Kerling, E.H.; Christifano, D.N.; Colombo, J.; Carlson, S.E. Prenatal docosahexaenoic acid supplementation has long-term effects on childhood behavioral and brain responses during performance on an inhibitory task. Nutr. Neurosci. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Newberry, S.J.; Chung, M.; Booth, M.; Maglione, M.A.; Tang, A.M.; O’Hanlon, C.E.; Wang, D.D.; Okunogbe, A.; Huang, C.; Motala, A.; et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Maternal and Child Health: An Updated Systematic Review. Évid. Rep. Assess. 2016, 2016, 1–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bergmann, R.L.; Haschke-Becher, E.; Klassen-Wigger, P.; Bergmann, K.E.; Richter, R.; Dudenhausen, J.W.; Grathwohl, D.; Haschke, F. Supplementation with 200 mg/day docosahexaenoic acid from mid-pregnancy through lactation improves the docosahexaenoic acid status of mothers with a habitually low fish intake and of their infants. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2008, 52, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Khandelwal, S.; Swamy, M.K.; Patil, K.; Kondal, D.; Chaudhry, M.; Gupta, R.; Divan, G.; Kamate, M.; Ramakrishnan, L.; Bellad, M.B.; et al. The impact of DocosaHexaenoic Acid supplementation during pregnancy and lactation on Neurodevelopment of the offspring in India (DHANI): Trial protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2018, 18, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Longvah, T.; Bhaskarachary, K.; Venkaiah, K.; Longvah, T.; Aṉantaṉ, I. Indian food Composition Tables; National Institute of Nutrition: Telangana, India, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  40. Patni, B. Developmental Assessment Scales for Indian Infants (DASII). Ind. J. Prac. Pediatr. 2012, 14, 409–412. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferreri, C.; Masi, A.; Sansone, A.; Giacometti, G.; LaRocca, A.V.; Menounou, G.; Scanferlato, R.; Tortorella, S.; Rota, D.; Conti, M.; et al. Fatty Acids in Membranes as Homeostatic, Metabolic and Nutritional Biomarkers: Recent Advancements in Analytics and Diagnostics. Diagnostics 2016, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Matthan, N.R.; Ooi, E.M.; Van Horn, L.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Woodman, R.; Lichtenstein, A.H. Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acid Biomarkers of Dietary Fat Quality and Endogenous Metabolism Predict Coronary Heart Disease Risk: A Nested Case-Control Study Within the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2014, 3, e000764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rose, H.G.; Oklander, M. Improved Procedure for The Extraction of Lipids from Human Erythrocytes. J. Lipid Res. 1965, 6, 428–431. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lepage, G.; Roy, C.C. Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction. J. Lipid Res. 1986, 27, 114–120. [Google Scholar]
  45. Finley, D.A.; Lönnerdal, B.; Dewey, K.G.; E Grivetti, L. Breast milk composition: Fat content and fatty acid composition in vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985, 41, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ramakrishnan, U.; Stinger, A.; DiGirolamo, A.M.; Martorell, R.; Neufeld, L.M.; Rivera, J.A.; Schnaas, L.; Stein, A.D.; Wang, M. Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation and Offspring Development at 18 Months: Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Van Der Merwe, L.F.; Moore, S.E.; Fulford, A.J.; Halliday, K.E.; Drammeh, S.; Young, S.; Prentice, A.M. Long-chain PUFA supplementation in rural African infants: A randomized controlled trial of effects on gut integrity, growth, and cognitive development. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Van Goor, S.A.; Dijck-Brouwer, D.J.; Erwich, J.J.H.; Schaafsma, A.; Hadders-Algra, M. The influence of supplemental docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acids during pregnancy and lactation on neurodevelopment at eighteen months. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2011, 84, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Helland, I.B.; Smith, L.; Sareem, K.; Saugstad, O.D.; Drevon, C.A. Maternal supplementation with very-long-chain n-3 fatty acids during pregnancy and lactation augments children’s IQ at 4 years of age. Pediatrics 2003, 111, e39–e44. [Google Scholar]
  50. Makrides, M.; Gibson, R.; McPhee, A.J.; Yelland, L.; Quinlivan, J.; Ryan, P. Effect of DHA Supplementation During Pregnancy on Maternal Depression and Neurodevelopment of Young Children. JAMA 2010, 304, 1675–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Colombo, J.; Carlson, S.E.; Cheatham, C.L.; Gustafson, K.M.; Kepler, A.; Doty, T. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infancy reduces heart rate and positively affects distribution of attention. Pediatr. Res. 2011, 70, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Morton, S.U.; Vyas, R.; Gagoski, B.; Vu, C.; Litt, J.; Larsen, R.J.; Kuchan, M.J.; Lasekan, J.B.; Sutton, B.P.; Grant, P.E.; et al. Maternal Dietary Intake of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Correlates Positively with Regional Brain Volumes in 1-Month-Old Term Infants. Cereb. Cortex 2020, 30, 2057–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Colombo, J.; Gustafson, K.M.; Gajewski, B.J.; Shaddy, D.J.; Kerling, E.H.; Thodosoff, J.M.; Doty, T.; Brez, C.C.; Carlson, S.E. Prenatal DHA supplementation and infant attention. Pediatr. Res. 2016, 80, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Braarud, H.C.; Markhus, M.W.; Skotheim, S.; Stormark, K.M.; Frøyland, L.; Graff, I.E.; Kjellevold, M. Maternal DHA Status during Pregnancy Has a Positive Impact on Infant Problem Solving: A Norwegian Prospective Observation Study. Nutrients 2018, 10, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gould, J.F.; Smithers, L.G.; Makrides, M. The effect of maternal omega-3 (n-3) LCPUFA supplementation during pregnancy on early childhood cognitive and visual development: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Colombo, J.; Carlson, S.E. Is the measure the message: The BSID and nutritional interventions. Pediatrics 2012, 129, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Jensen, C.L.; Voigt, R.G.; Llorente, A.M.; Peters, S.U.; Prager, T.C.; Zou, Y.L.; Rozelle, J.C.; Turcich, M.R.; Fraley, J.K.; Anderson, R.E.; et al. Effects of Early Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid Intake on Neuropsychological Status and Visual Acuity at Five Years of Age of Breast-Fed Term Infants. J. Pediatr. 2010, 157, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bradshaw, J.L. Developmental Disorders of the Frontostriatal System: Neuropsychological, Neuropsychiatric and Evolutionary Perspectives. Developmental Disorders of the Frontostriatal System: Neuropsychological, Neuropsychiatric and Evolutionary Perspectives; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  59. Cheatham, C.L.; Colombo, J.; Carlson, S.E. N-3 fatty acids and cognitive and visual acuity development: Methodologic and conceptual considerations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 1458S–1466S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Klevebro, S.; Juul, S.E.; Wood, T.R. A More Comprehensive Approach to the Neuroprotective Potential of Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Preterm Infants Is Needed—Should We Consider Maternal Diet and the n-6:n-3 Fatty Acid Ratio? Front. Pediatr. 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Santos, D.C.C.; Angulo-Barroso, R.; Li, M.; Bian, Y.; Sturza, J.; Richards, B.; Lozoff, B. Timing, duration, and severity of iron deficiency in early development and motor outcomes at 9 months. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Morse, N.L. Benefits of Docosahexaenoic Acid, Folic Acid, Vitamin D and Iodine on Foetal and Infant Brain Development and Function Following Maternal Supplementation during Pregnancy and Lactation. Nutrents 2012, 4, 799–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Singh, M. Essential fatty acids, DHA and human brain. Indian J. Pediatr. 2005, 72, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dyall, S.C. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and the brain: A review of the independent and shared effects of EPA, DPA and DHA. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ferguson, K.T.; Cassells, R.C.; MacAllister, J.W.; Evans, G.W. The physical environment and child development: An international review. Int. J. Psychol. 2013, 48, 437–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Susane, A.A.; Santos, D.N.; Bastos, A.C.; Pedromonico, M.R.M.; de Almeida-Filho, N.; Barreto, M.L. Family environment and child’s cognitive development: An epidemiological approach. Rev. Saude Publica 2005, 39, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  67. Nguyen, P.H.; DiGirolamo, A.M.; Young, M.; Kim, N.; Nguyen, S.; Martorell, R.; Ramakrishnan, U.; Gonzalez-Casanova, I. Influences of early child nutritional status and home learning environment on child development in Vietnam. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Pinares-Garcia, P.; Stratikopoulos, M.; Zagato, A.; Loke, H.; Lee, J. Sex: A Significant Risk Factor for Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lemmers-Jansen, I.L.J.; Krabbendam, L.; Veltman, D.J.; Fett, A.-K.J. Boys vs. girls: Gender differences in the neural development of trust and reciprocity depend on social context. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2017, 25, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 12 03041 g001 550
Figure 1. Consort. # Reasons for exclusion: gestational diabetes (n = 69); Hb < 7 gm% (n = 46); gestational age >20 weeks (n = 673); high-risk pregnancies (n = 118); chronic conditions (n = 246); under any other trial (n = 4); delivery plan other than PK (n = 835); missing/wrong contact information (n = 257). * Others included: abortion (n = 1); abruptio placenta (n = 1); fresh stillbirth (n = 4); macerated stillbirth (n = 3); neonatal death (n = 2); maternal death (n = 1); congenital anomalies (n = 1); infant death (n = 2) in DHA group. ** Others included: fresh stillbirth (n = 4); macerated stillbirth (n = 2); medical termination (n = 1) in Placebo group.
Figure 1. Consort. # Reasons for exclusion: gestational diabetes (n = 69); Hb < 7 gm% (n = 46); gestational age >20 weeks (n = 673); high-risk pregnancies (n = 118); chronic conditions (n = 246); under any other trial (n = 4); delivery plan other than PK (n = 835); missing/wrong contact information (n = 257). * Others included: abortion (n = 1); abruptio placenta (n = 1); fresh stillbirth (n = 4); macerated stillbirth (n = 3); neonatal death (n = 2); maternal death (n = 1); congenital anomalies (n = 1); infant death (n = 2) in DHA group. ** Others included: fresh stillbirth (n = 4); macerated stillbirth (n = 2); medical termination (n = 1) in Placebo group.
Nutrients 12 03041 g001
Nutrients 12 03041 g002 550
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis. Difference: Placebo minus DHA; Difference in mean DQ score between DHA and placebo group at 12 months was calculated using two-sample t-test for each subgroup; p-value for interaction calculated using linear regression model including interaction term for characteristic of interest and treatment group.
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis. Difference: Placebo minus DHA; Difference in mean DQ score between DHA and placebo group at 12 months was calculated using two-sample t-test for each subgroup; p-value for interaction calculated using linear regression model including interaction term for characteristic of interest and treatment group.
Nutrients 12 03041 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.
DHA (N = 478)Placebo (N = 479)
Maternal age (years), mean ± SD23.5 ± 3.523.6 ± 3.7
Gestational age at enrollment (weeks), median (p25, p75)15.0 (12, 18)15.0 (12, 18)
Primigravida, n (%)180 (37.7%)206 (43.0%)
Education, n (%)
College graduated and above88 (18.4%)82 (17.1%)
High school/secondary371 (77.6%)386 (80.6%)
Employed, n (%)119 (25.0%)104 (22.0%)
Household income (>Rs 20,000), n (%)65 (13.6%)47 (9.8%)
Dietary habits—vegetarian, n (%)73 (15.3%)87 (18.2%)
Consuming fish/seafood, n (%)258 (53.9%)202 (57.8%)
Anthropometric measurements
Height (cm), mean ± SD154.1 ± 5.6153.9 ± 5.7
Weight (kg), mean ± SD48.9 ± 9.048.9 ± 8.5
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD20.5 ± 3.520.7 ± 3.6
MUAC, (cm), mean ± SD24.3 ± 3.024.3 ± 3.1
Biochemical measures
Hb (gm%), mean ± SD11.1 ± 1.311.2 ± 1.3
DHA (mol % of fatty acid) *-, mean ± SD0.86 ± 0.780.88 ± 0.71
BMI: Body mass index; MUAC: Mid upper arm circumference; Hb: Hemoglobin; DHA: Docosahexaenoic acid; *- N = 258 (DHA); N = 224 (Placebo). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (p25, p75) or number (%).
Table
Table 2. Offspring characteristics at delivery.
Table 2. Offspring characteristics at delivery.
At DeliveryDHA
N = 450		Placebo
N = 452
Live births, n (%)450 (94.1%)452 (94.3%)
Gestational age at the time of delivery (weeks), median (p25, p 75)39.0 (38.0, 40.0)39.0 (38.0, 40.0)
Delivery place—study center, n (%)372 (84.7%)375 (85.2%)
Delivery conducted by doctor, n (%)416 (94.5%)423 (96.1%)
Spontaneous labor, n (%)410 (93.2%)407 (92.5%)
Caesarean, n (%)154 (35.0%)175 (39.8%)
Male child, n (%)234 (52.0%)243 (54.0%)
Data are presented as median (p25, p75) or number (%); denominator for live births DHA (N = 478); Placebo (N = 479).
Table
Table 3. Feeding practices.
Table 3. Feeding practices.
DHA n/N (%)Placebo
n/N (%)
Initiation of breastfeeding in 1 h, n (%)346/433 (79.9%)357/437 (81.7%)
Exclusively breastfed until 6 months, n (%)236/426 (55.4%)237/421 (56.3%)
Age at which complementary feeding initiated (months) *, mean ± SD5.4 ± 0.675.3 ± 0.83
Data are presented as number (%); * DHA (N = 166); Placebo (N = 156).
Table
Table 4. Mean DHA (mol % of fatty acid) levels in RBC phospholipids.
Table 4. Mean DHA (mol % of fatty acid) levels in RBC phospholipids.
DHAPlaceboMean Difference * [95% CI]p-Value
DHA at baselineN = 258
0.86 ± 0.78,
0.56 (0.32, 1.21)		N = 224
0.88 ± 0.71,
0.55 (0.37, 1.28)		0.02 [0.11,0.15]0.77
DHA at the time of deliveryN = 271
2.03 ± 1.75,
1.41 (0.61, 2.99)		N = 242
1.12 ± 0.86,
0.83 (0.42, 1.72)		−0.91 [−1.16, 0.67]<0.001
DHA in cord bloodN = 265
2.61 ± 1.45,
2.64 (1.38, 3.81)		N = 232
1.83 ± 0.90,
1.76 (1.16, 2.48)		−0.77 [−0.99, 0.56]<0.001
DHA in infant blood at 6 monthsN = 263
1.94 ± 1.42,
1.65 (0.64, 3.08)		N = 240
0.84 ± 0.56,
0.77 (0.43, 1.12)		−1.09 [−1.29, −0.9]<0.001
DHA in infant blood at 12 monthsN = 227
1.71 ± 1.18,
1.50 (0.60, 2.64)		N = 204
1.27 ± 0.93,
1.03 (0.43, 1.89)		−0.44 [−0.64, −0.24]<0.001
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (p25, p75); DHA: Docosahexaenoic acid; p-value calculated using unpaired t-test; * difference = Placebo minus DHA.
Table
Table 5. DQ score and components of DQ (motor and mental scores) at 12th month.
Table 5. DQ score and components of DQ (motor and mental scores) at 12th month.
At 12th MonthDHA
(n = 433)		Placebo
(N = 430)		Difference * [95% CI]p-Value
DQ score96.6 ± 12.197.1 ± 13.00.46 [−1.23,2.14]0.60
Motor score47.6 ± 3.747.6 ± 3.70.03 [−0.47,0.52]0.92
Mental score106.0 ± 7.0106.7 ± 7.60.63 [−0.35,1.61]0.21
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and [95% CI]; unadjusted model: t-test for difference between mean values at 12 months; DQ: development quotient. * Placebo minus DHA.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khandelwal, S.; Kondal, D.; Chaudhry, M.; Patil, K.; Swamy, M.K.; Metgud, D.; Jogalekar, S.; Kamate, M.; Divan, G.; Gupta, R.; et al. Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Supplementation on Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 Months in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103041

AMA Style

Khandelwal S, Kondal D, Chaudhry M, Patil K, Swamy MK, Metgud D, Jogalekar S, Kamate M, Divan G, Gupta R, et al. Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Supplementation on Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 Months in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2020; 12(10):3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khandelwal, Shweta, Dimple Kondal, Monica Chaudhry, Kamal Patil, Mallaiah Kenchaveeraiah Swamy, Deepa Metgud, Sandesh Jogalekar, Mahesh Kamate, Gauri Divan, Ruby Gupta, and et al. 2020. "Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Supplementation on Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 Months in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial" Nutrients 12, no. 10: 3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103041

APA Style

Khandelwal, S., Kondal, D., Chaudhry, M., Patil, K., Swamy, M. K., Metgud, D., Jogalekar, S., Kamate, M., Divan, G., Gupta, R., Prabhakaran, D., Tandon, N., Ramakrishnan, U., & Stein, A. D. (2020). Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Supplementation on Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 Months in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients, 12(10), 3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103041

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop