Next Article in Journal
Effects of Sucralose Ingestion versus Sucralose Taste on Metabolic Responses to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Participants with Normal Weight and Obesity: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Trading on Food Quality due to Changes in Prices: Are There Any Nutritional Effects?
Open AccessArticle

Repeatability of Taste Recognition Threshold Measurements with QUEST and Quick Yes–No

1
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany
2
Psychophysiology of Food Perception, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010024
Received: 17 November 2019 / Revised: 12 December 2019 / Accepted: 13 December 2019 / Published: 20 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Taste Perception and Food Preferences)
Taste perception, although vital for nutrient sensing, has long been overlooked in sensory assessments. This can, at least in part, be attributed to challenges associated with the handling of liquid, perishable stimuli, but also with scarce efforts to optimize testing procedures to be more time-efficient. We have previously introduced an adaptive, QUEST-based procedure to measure taste sensitivity thresholds that was quicker than other existing approaches, yet similarly reliable. Despite its advantages, the QUEST procedure lacks experimental control of false alarms (i.e., response bias) and psychometric function slope. Variations of these parameters, however, may also influence the threshold estimate. This raises the question as to whether a procedure that simultaneously assesses threshold, false-alarm rate, and slope might be able to produce threshold estimates with higher repeatability, i.e., smaller variation between repeated measurements. Here, we compared the performance of QUEST with a method that allows measurement of false-alarm rates and slopes, quick Yes–No (qYN), in a test–retest design for citric acid, sodium chloride, quinine hydrochloride, and sucrose recognition thresholds. We used complementary measures of repeatability, namely test–retest correlations and coefficients of repeatability. Both threshold procedures yielded largely overlapping thresholds with good repeatability between measurements. Together the data suggest that participants used a conservative response criterion. Furthermore, we explored the link between taste sensitivity and taste liking or which we found, however, no clear association. View Full-Text
Keywords: sensitivity; taste; threshold; staircase; QUEST; bias; quick Yes–No (qYN) sensitivity; taste; threshold; staircase; QUEST; bias; quick Yes–No (qYN)
Show Figures

Figure 1

  • Externally hosted supplementary file 1
    Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3540534
    Link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3540534
    Description: The data reported in this paper along with graphical representations of individual threshold runs and psychometric functions.
MDPI and ACS Style

Höchenberger, R.; Ohla, K. Repeatability of Taste Recognition Threshold Measurements with QUEST and Quick Yes–No. Nutrients 2020, 12, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop