Next Article in Journal
Acute Dietary Nitrate Supplementation Improves Flow Mediated Dilatation of the Superficial Femoral Artery in Healthy Older Males
Next Article in Special Issue
Immunomodulatory and Metabolic Changes after Gnetin-C Supplementation in Humans
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Tomato Nutrient Complex on Blood Pressure: A Double Blind, Randomized Dose–Response Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leveraging the Cardio-Protective and Anticancer Properties of Resveratrol in Cardio-Oncology

Nutrients 2019, 11(5), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11050953

Review
Can Resveratrol Treatment Control the Progression of Induced Periodontal Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies
1
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universidade dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri—UFVJM, Rua Vereador João Narciso, n.º 1380–Bairro Cachoeira, Unaí, Minas Gerais 38610-000, Brazil
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Lavras—UFLA, Mail Box 3037, Lavras, Minas Gerais 37200-000, Brazil
3
Department of Exact Sciences, Universidade Federal de Lavras—UFLA, Mail Box 3037, Lavras, Minas Gerais 37200-000, Brazil
4
Department of Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Lavras—UFLA, Mail Box 3037, Lavras, Minas Gerais 37200-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 March 2019 / Accepted: 24 April 2019 / Published: 26 April 2019

Abstract

:
Resveratrol is an anti-inflammatory compound found in several foods. Periodontal disease (PD) is associated to other systemic diseases, and inflammation may be responsible for the association. Consequently, controlling inflammation not only may benefit oral health but also may assist with the management of other chronic inflammatory conditions. We aimed to investigate the effects of resveratrol administration on PD control in preclinical studies. A systematic search was performed for scientific articles using both electronic databases and a manual search using combinations of the following keywords: “resveratrol” OR “3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene” AND “periodontal disease” OR “periodontitis” OR “gingivitis”. Only in vivo original studies investigating resveratrol treatment on experimental animal models of PD were selected. A quality assessment of the studies was performed using the Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiment (ARRIVE) guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Syrcle tool. The search returned 570 articles, and 11 matched the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed that resveratrol treatment attenuated alveolar bone loss (τ2 = 0.0041; 95% CI: −0.14; −0.04). The ARRIVE criteria reported a good quality of studies in general (mean score 28.5 ± 2.5). However, five Syrcle domains indicated a high risk of bias or did not present information clearly. We concluded that, in preclinical studies, resveratrol treatment prevented PD progression.
Keywords:
2,3,5,4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-glucoside; Periodontitis; Oral Health; Mouth Diseases; Functional Food

1. Introduction

Resveratrol (3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene) is a polyphenol stilbene found in red wine [1], peanuts [2], apples, several vegetables and berries, and others [3]. This compound has gained attention due to the “French Paradox” that indicates a low incidence of cardiovascular diseases and even consuming a high saturated fat diet [4]. The explanation for this paradox is associated with the consumption of red wine in France that naturally contains “therapeutic doses” of resveratrol [5]. Recently, resveratrol was also linked to several other health benefits such as cardioprotective effects, antitumor activity, and a life span increase [6,7]. Consequently, resveratrol has been investigated for the prophylaxis and therapeutic treatment of periodontal disease (PD) based on its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [3,8].
PD embraces a group of inflammatory conditions affecting teeth supporting tissues [9]. It may be limited to the gums (gingivitis) or may affect the alveolar bone and periodontal ligament (periodontitis), causing apical epithelial migration and alveolar bone resorption [9]. This inflammation frequently involves a host response against biofilm accumulation and is mostly clinically asymptomatic in its early stages [10]. The direct consequences of PD involve gingival bleeding, tooth mobility, and even tooth loss, leading to aesthetic impairment and a poor quality of life [10]. In addition, PD is also associated with other systemic diseases such as cardiac, renal, and respiratory dysfunction; rheumatoid arthritis; metabolic syndrome; and even cancer [11].
It is estimated that the prevalence of PD in the world population exceeds 50% of adults older than 30 year. Approximately 10% of these individuals present the more severe forms [12,13]. Population growth and aging have been contributing to an increase of severe periodontitis cases [13,14], generating a universal public health issue [13,15]. Risk factors for the development and progression of PD involve mainly genetic polymorphisms, stress, obesity and diabetes, smoking, and alcoholism [16]. Proper oral hygiene and regular dental care (including scaling and root planning) are conventional therapies employed in dental practice [17]. Alternatively, maintaining an ideal weight and consuming a high-quality diet can also help to improve periodontal health [18], besides avoiding smoking and excessive alcohol drinking.
Animal studies have evaluated the effects of resveratrol administration on experimentally induced periodontitis showing promising results [19,20,21]. However, the issue is not yet fully understood, making difficult the incorporation of resveratrol as a therapeutic/preventive agent clinically. Clinical studies investigating these parameters in humans are scarce, maybe because there is still no evidence from preclinical studies to support its incorporation into an improvement to disease prevention/treatment. In this regard, a systematic review with a meta-analysis can bring light to this question [22]. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of resveratrol administration on the periodontal status in preclinical animal studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Focused Question

The Participants, Interventions, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) format was used to formulate the focused question “Can resveratrol administration control the progression of induced periodontal disease?”
In this sense, the PICO represent the following: P: laboratory animals with induced periodontal disease (all species); I: resveratrol administration; C: no resveratrol or vehicle only; and O: alveolar bone loss and an expression of cytokines.
To ensure the quality of this study, we adopted the criteria of The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [23] and the protocol for the preparation, registration, and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies described by Vries et al. [24].

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

2.2.1. Type of Studies

Only preclinical (animal models) studies using resveratrol administration on an induced periodontal disease were eligible for this review. There was no restriction of the publication date or language.

2.2.2. Research Strategy

An electronic search in five databases were performed in February 2019: PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), ScienceDirect (https://www.sciencedirect.com), Scielo (http://www.scielo.org/php/index.php), Scopus (https://www.scopus.com), and Web of Science- ISI Web of Knowledge databases (https://login.webofknowledge.com). The following search strategy was used: “resveratrol”, “3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene” AND “periodontal disease”, “periodontitis”, OR “gingivitis”. Additionally, in order to avoid that any relevant article was not selected, we performed an additional search using the keywords such as “melinjo” and “red wine” which also combined with the terms “periodontitis” and “periodontal disease”. A manual search was conducted in the reference lists of the included studies. A manual search was also conducted in the reference list of all retrieved articles.

2.3. Screening Methods and Selection of Studies

We selected only original in vivo studies that investigated the effect of resveratrol administration on an induced periodontitis progression in animal models. There was no restriction regarding the publication language, resveratrol administration, PD induction protocol, trial period, genus, species or sample size, and/or publication date. The exclusion criteria were literature reviews, letters to the editor, editorials, in vitro studies, book chapters, conference abstracts, and drug development without an in vivo analysis.
Two independent reviewers were trained and conducted searches in accordance with inclusion/exclusion criteria. Articles were selected based on abstracts and/or title. In cases of a nonconformity among the selected items, a third reviewer was called for consensus. After a full text analysis, a new discussion was performed in order to determine the possible extra exclusion of studies.
Bone loss data for the treated and non-treated (control) groups were recorded in order to calculate the relative reduction due to treatment. Absolute values were annotated from original tables or estimated from figures in the retrieved articles.

2.4. Quality Criteria Assessment

We performed a quality criteria evaluation of the selected studies following the Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiment (ARRIVE) guidelines. It contains a predefined grading for 20 categories [25,26]. Each criterion received a score as reported previously [25,26,27,28]. Items “1”, “4”, “11”, and “14” received a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 1 (0 = inaccurate, not concise, or not reported; 1 = accurate, concise, or reported). The other items (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20) received a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 2 (0 = clearly inaccurate or not reported; 1 = possibly accurate, unclear, or incomplete; 2 = clearly accurate). The sum of the scores varied from zero to 36 points. The maximum score by columns were also calculated to obtain the quality score sum by category, as described by Javed et al. [27]. Thus, the maximum score found by category was the maximum possible score. We calculated a ratio Quality Score/Maximum Score, generating three possible range coefficients in which 0.8–1 was considered “excellent”, 0.5–0.8 was considered “average”, and scores below 0.5 were considered “poor” [27].

2.5. Bias Risk Assessment

We evaluated the risk of bias using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool [29]. This tool contains 10 entries related to the selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting bias among others. The classification of the quality criteria and risk of bias were performed by two independent authors. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus with a third reviewer.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A meta-analysis was performed by using the META package [30] of the R statistical software [31]. In order to avoid a methodological heterogeneity in meta-analysis, only studies that evaluated a bone loss through a measurement of the cementoenamel distance to the bone crest in methylene blue stain specimens were included in forest plot. The inverse variance method was applied and the DerSimonian–Laird method was used to estimate the difference between-studies variance (τ2). The mean difference was used as effect measure, i.e., the mean value in resveratrol group minus the mean value in control group (without resveratrol).
A random effect model was used for the meta-analysis. The summary of the effect measure was depicted in a forest plot. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented in the plot. In this design, for each study, the mean value, standard deviation, and sample size were reported for both experimental (with resveratrol) and control (without resveratrol) groups.
The publication bias was not quantitatively evaluated by Egger test or funnel plot despite the number of studies grouped in the funnel plot [32].

3. Results

The initial searches in all databases returned 570 articles, and 14 of these were preselected. After full text analysis, 11 papers met the inclusion criteria for this review (Figure 1).
Two of the preselected articles were excluded despite an evaluation of the periodontal tissue during orthodontic tooth movement [33] and an alveolar bone loss induction by artificial occlusal trauma [34]. A third study was excluded because the concentration of resveratrol in a grape seed extract was not informed [35].
Additionally, one study evaluated the effects of resveratrol administration on periodontitis in humans [36]. In this study, four weeks of daily intake of capsules containing 480 mg of resveratrol decreased the mean pocket depth in diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis compared to patients consuming a placebo.
Out of the 11 selected studies, seven used Wistar rats as experimental model [20,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Another two studies used Sprague–Dawley rats [21,43]. Two additional papers used C57BLKS/J-db/db [19] and C57BL/6J wild-type mice [44]. All studies reported using males, and the age at the beginning of the experiment protocol ranged from 8–10 weeks for rats and from 6–8 weeks for mice. The duration of induced PD ranged from 8 [43] to 30 days [41,42]. All articles reported the ligature protocol. However, Bhattarai et al. [21] and Zhen et al. [19] also administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or a medium containing Porphyromonas gingivalis, respectively.
Resveratrol administration routes included intraperitoneal [44], subcutaneous [21], oral [38], or via gavage [19,20,37,39,40,41,42,43]. Doses varied from 10 mg/kg [20,21,37,38,39,40,41,42] to 25 mg/kg [43]. The duration of treatment also varied from seven [43] to 30 days [20,39,40,41,42]. Ikeda et al. [44] used a single dose corresponding to 0.001% (w/w) of the body weight.
Alveolar bone loss (ABL) was evaluated in 10 of the 11 selected studies, and a treatment with resveratrol attenuated this parameter in nine of these articles [19,20,21,37,38,40,41,42,44]. In six studies, ABL was evaluated through morphometry using a cement–enamel junction distance to the bone crest in methylene blue stained samples [19,20,37,40,41,42]. One study also evaluated ABL through a morphometry of the cement–enamel junction distance in Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained specimens [21]. Three studies evaluated ABL using Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) [21,38,44], and one study used radiographic examination [36]. Oxidative stress and inflammatory improvement were also reported for animals receiving resveratrol [19,20,21,37,38,40,41,42,44]. Cirano et al. [32], on the other hand, found no differences for Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Tannerella forsythia concentrations in ligatures extracted from rats after resveratrol administration.
Four studies evaluated the effects of resveratrol on PD associated with other conditions such as arthritis [42], smoke inhalation [20,40], and diabetes [19]. All articles indicated an improvement of PD after resveratrol administration. In one study [41], resveratrol was combined with curcumin. No synergism was observed for ABL or gingival IFN-γ. The main characteristics of the selected studies are described in Table 1 and Table 2. An average bone loss reduction with resveratrol ranged from 7.09% [38] to 61.52% [21] (Table 2).

3.1. Risk of Bias in Studies

The results of SYRCLE showed that 63% of studies were classified as low risk in the allocation details domain. In the domains “baseline characteristic” and “other bias”, 81% of the studies presented a low risk of bias. A high risk of bias was observed in all papers for the item “allocation concealment”, since no animal allocation was mentioned. The domains “random housing of animals” and “random selection for outcome assessment” showed an unclear risk of bias, 81% and 45%, respectively. Several studies did not provide enough information on the “blinding of participants” and were classified as unclear (36%) or as high risk of bias (63%), while only 0.9% of studies presented a low risk of bias for this item. Almost half (45%) of the studies scored as low risk of bias in both the domains “blinding of outcome assessment” and “incomplete outcome data” while the other half were scored as an unclear risk of bias because of lack of detailed information. Most of the studies (91%) presented a low risk of bias in the item “selective outcome reporting” (Table 3).

3.2. Quality Assessment of Selected Publications

The total quality score among the studies ranged from 18 to 32 (mean score 28.5 ± 2.5) out of a maximum of 36 points (Table 4) according to the ARRIVE guidelines. Eleven categories scored as “excellent”, while nine categories were classified as “average”. No category was classified as “poor”.

3.3. Meta-Analysis Results

There was a high heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 95%; p < 0.01), and for this reason, a random effects model was used in meta-analysis (Figure 2), since the subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression must not be conducted due to few studies. Using the random effects model, it was possible to observe that the small studies received from 6.5 to 17.5% of the weights as well as that the pooled weighted mean difference was of −0.09 (τ2 = 0.0041; p < 0.01), which may be in a 95% CI from −0.14 to −0.04. This result indicates a significant effect in the reduction of the alveolar bone loss with the use of resveratrol.

4. Discussion

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of resveratrol administration on PD progression in preclinical studies. Out of the eleven selected studies, ten evaluated ABL and nine observed improvement of this parameter after resveratrol administration [19,20,21,37,38,40,41,42,44]. Such results may be related to an improvement of oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory properties [3,8].
Resveratrol increases the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD), which are key components against reactive oxygen species (ROS) [45]. Moreover, the host response to periodontal pathogens promotes local and systemic elevations of proinflammatory cytokines that alter the expression of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) on the osteoblast surface [46]. RANKL is responsible for activating osteoclasts through its interaction with the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK), initiating bone resorption [46]. High levels of ROS acting as intracellular signal transducers result in autophagy, which plays a dual role in periodontitis by promoting cell death or blocking apoptosis in infected cells [47]. In addition, ROS may influence the activation of signaling nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), resulting in an increase of proinflammatory cytokines and, consequently, stimulating the differentiation of osteoclasts [47]. Considering that PD can be worsened due to the increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines and ROS, resveratrol acts on both fronts attenuating the progression of this disease [8].
One of the retrieved studies, Chin et al. [43] found no significant improvement in ABL in animals treated with resveratrol (even with the largest dose of 25 mg/kg/day). However, the treatment period was maintained for only seven days. [43]. It is possible that there is some mechanism related to the time of action or even to the administration period of this (prior to or following induction of PD). More studies should be conducted to determine the effective optimal dose and duration needed to attenuate ABL. Regarding toxicity, no side effects were reported for resveratrol consumption in any of the selected studies.
Regarding administration route, only two studies evaluated the injectable administration of resveratrol [21,44]. Even a single 0.001% (w/w) dose delivered one day prior to PD induction promoted ABL reduction, inflammatory profile, and oxidative stress improvements in C57BL/6J wild-type mice [44]. The highest percentages of ABL reduction were observed in studies where resveratrol was injected [21,44]. This fact may be related to the reduction of resveratrol bioavailability after gastrointestinal absorption [48].
The mechanisms involved in resveratrol regulation in periodontal inflammation have not yet been fully elucidated [21]. It is known that resveratrol can decrease the expression of toll-like receptor type 4 (TRL4) which is activated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [21]. An activation of TLR4 observed in chronic periodontitis increases the production of proinflammatory cytokines [49]. Another possible mechanism is by increasing anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-4 [42], as well as a suppression of both matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [21]. IL-4 suppress the production of IL-17 and IL-1β [42], which play an important role in the periodontitis pathogenesis and inhibit both Th1 pro-inflammatory response and bone resorption [50].
All analyzed studies used rat or mice. Rodent periodontium has a good similarity with humans [51]. The induction of periodontitis involved the ligature in all experiments. This model has several advantages such as low cost and the possibility of investigation in a wide genetic variety of rodents, besides allowing the exploration of the interaction between the oral microorganisms and host response during the development of periodontitis [7]. Even though rats are not natural hosts for some bacteria found in human oral cavity, both A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis have been reported in rodents’ microbiota after ligature [39,52,53].
Regarding the quality assessment of studies, most of the categories were classified as excellent or average. A previous systematic review [54] using the ARRIVE guidelines reported that most animal studies lack a clear indication of the reasons for choosing a particular animal model, contributing to a lower score for this item. This item also received the lowest score. This aspect is considered an important criterion for preclinical animal trials [54]. Thus, even if it is already well-known that some results of studies in rodents can be extrapolated to humans, it is important to highlight the relevance of the model used.
Another ARRIVE item that scored as low in several studies was the “interpretation/scientific implications” since only a few articles commented about the limitations and bias as well as mentioned the 3Rs (replacement, refinement, and reduction) principles adopted in experiments with animal studies. Similar results were also reported by Dereka et al. [55], in which only 10% of the studies attended this question.
Among the risk of bias assessed, the domains “allocation concealment”, “random housing”, “blinding of participants and personnel”, “random outcome assessment”, and “blinding of outcome assessment domains” presented a high risk of bias or were not clearly described. These same domains were classified as unclear or with a high risk of bias according to the Syrcle tool in previous study [56]. In a systematic review of animal studies [54], 40% and 60% of studies presented a high risk of bias and an unclear risk in the “allocation concealment” domain, respectively. Randomized housing during the experiment reduces the bias risk once these conditions (such as lighting, humidity, temperature, etc.) are known to influence study outcomes [29]. An implementation of a blind evaluation in animal studies is also crucial, especially for subjective measurements [57].
This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA criteria [23] and the protocol for the preparation, registration, and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies [24]. In order to minimize bias, each step of searching or ranking was performed by two independent researchers. Additionally, to prevent the exclusion of any article, a careful search was conducted. It is important to emphasize that, in the searches performed, we have not found previous systematic review or meta-analysis studies involving the main question addressed in this study.
The results of meta-analysis demonstrated that, in rats, bone loss was significantly lower due to resveratrol administration. However, only a few studies were eligible for the meta-analysis (seven), and it was not possible to assess the publication bias. Considering the potential benefits of resveratrol on periodontal health, further studies should be conducted investigating the effects of this compound in PD models. In addition, future studies should focus on reducing the risk of bias, especially in the areas related to “allocation concealment” and "blinding of participants and personnel" which contributed to the greatest risk of bias.

5. Conclusions

We concluded from preclinical studies that resveratrol can improve periodontal disease probably due to the modulation of both oxidative stress and inflammatory profile. The results obtained through ARRIVE showed a good quality of the studies overall. However, the analysis by the Syrcle tool demonstrated that some aspects related to randomization and blinding should be considered to reduce the risk of bias.
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated promising effects of resveratrol on periodontal disease, which may stimulate future studies in humans. Because of species-specific variables such as oral microbiota, dose-response effect, and the route of administration, the results in humans may vary from those observed in animals. Clinical studies are essential to confirm the results observed in animal studies.

Author Contributions

The following statements should be used “conceptualization, E.F.A. and L.J.P.; methodology, E.F.A., D.R.O., A.M.S.A., J.N.B.M.d.A., and D.V.A.; formal analysis, R.R.d.L. and A.R.L.-J.; investigation, E.F.A., D.R.O., A.M.S.A. and D.V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.F.A. and L.J.P.; writing—review and editing, E.F.A., D.V.A., J.N.B.M.d.A., R.R.d.L., A.R.L.-J. and L.J.P.; visualization, L.J.P.; supervision, E.F.A. and L.J.P.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Program of Support for Scientific Publication in High Impact of Universidade Federal de Lavras - PAPEI/PRPG/UFLA - EDITAL 01/2019.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge FAPEMIG (Research Support Foundation of Minas Gerais), CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel), CNPq (National Council for Research and Development), and the Federal University of Lavras (UFLA) for their financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pastor, R.F.; Restani, P.; Di Lorenzo, C.; Orgiu, F.; Teissedre, P.-L.; Stockley, C.; Ruf, J.C.; Quini, C.I.; Garcìa Tejedor, N.; Gargantini, R.; et al. Resveratrol, human health and winemaking perspectives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sales, J.M.; Resurreccion, A.V.A. Resveratrol in Peanuts. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 734–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baur, J.A.; Sinclair, D.A. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Catalgol, B.; Batirel, S.; Taga, Y.; Ozer, N.K. Resveratrol: French Paradox Revisited. Front. Pharmacol. 2012, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Biagi, M.; Bertelli, A.A.E. Wine, alcohol and pills: What future for the French paradox? Life Sci. 2015, 131, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Weiskirchen, S.; Weiskirchen, R. Resveratrol: How Much Wine Do You Have to Drink to Stay Healthy? Adv. Nutr. An Int. Rev. J. 2016, 7, 706–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marchesan, J.; Girnary, M.S.; Jing, L.; Miao, M.Z.; Zhang, S.; Sun, L.; Morelli, T.; Schoenfisch, M.H.; Inohara, N.; Offenbacher, S.; et al. An experimental murine model to study periodontitis. Nat. Protoc. 2018, 13, 2247–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chin, Y.-T.; Cheng, G.-Y.; Shih, Y.-J.; Lin, C.-Y.; Lin, S.-J.; Lai, H.-Y.; Whang-Peng, J.; Chiu, H.-C.; Lee, S.-Y.; Fu, E.; et al. Therapeutic applications of resveratrol and its derivatives on periodontitis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1403, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cekici, A.; Kantarci, A.; Hasturk, H.; Van Dyke, T.E. Inflammatory and immune pathways in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Periodontol. 2000 2014, 64, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Casanova, L.; Hughes, F.J.; Preshaw, P.M. Diabetes and periodontal disease: A two-way relationship. Br. Dent. J. 2014, 217, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Winning, L.; Linden, G.J. Periodontitis and systemic disease. BDJ Team 2015, 2, 15163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  12. Borgnakke, W.S.; Ylöstalo, P.V.; Taylor, G.W.; Genco, R.J. Effect of periodontal disease on diabetes: Systematic review of epidemiologic observational evidence. J. Periodontol. 2013, 84, S135–S152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eke, P.I.; Lu, H.; Zhang, X.; Thornton-Evans, G.; Borgnakke, W.S.; Holt, J.B.; Croft, J.B. Geospatial distribution of periodontists and US adults with severe periodontitis. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2019, 150, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kassebaum, N.J.; Smith, A.G.C.; Bernabé, E.; Fleming, T.D.; Reynolds, A.E.; Vos, T.; Murray, C.J.L.; Marcenes, W.; GBD 2015 Oral Health Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence, Incidence, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for Oral Conditions for 195 Countries, 1990–2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Dumitrescu, A.L. Editorial: Periodontal Disease—A Public Health Problem. Front. Public. Heal. 2015, 3, e278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Genco, R.J.; Borgnakke, W.S. Risk factors for periodontal disease. Periodontol. 2000 2013, 62, 59–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, H.; Xiong, X.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Qian, X. A randomized controlled trial of pre-conception treatment for periodontal disease to improve periodontal status during pregnancy and birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al-Zahrani, M.S.; Borawski, E.A.; Bissada, N.F. Periodontitis and three health-enhancing behaviors: maintaining normal weight, engaging in recommended level of exercise, and consuming a high-quality diet. J. Periodontol. 2005, 76, 1362–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhen, L.; Fan, D.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Wang, L. Resveratrol ameliorates experimental periodontitis in diabetic mice through negative regulation of TLR4 signaling. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015, 36, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Corrêa, M.G.; Absy, S.; Tenenbaum, H.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Cirano, F.R.; Casati, M.Z.; Pimentel, S.P. Resveratrol attenuates oxidative stress during experimental periodontitis in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation. J. Periodontal Res. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhattarai, G.; Poudel, S.B.; Kook, S.-H.; Lee, J.-C. Resveratrol prevents alveolar bone loss in an experimental rat model of periodontitis. Acta Biomater. 2016, 29, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Khan, K.S.; Kunz, R.; Kleijnen, J.; Antes, G. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J. R. Soc. Med. 2003, 96, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Group, T.P. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Vries, R.B.M.; Hooijmans, C.R.; Langendam, M.W.; van Luijk, J.; Leenaars, M.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.; Wever, K.E. A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies. Evidence-based Preclin. Med. 2015, 2, e00007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 160, 1577–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Javed, F.; Kellesarian, S.V.; Abduljabbar, T.; Abduljabbar, A.T.; Akram, Z.; Vohra, F.; Rahman, I.; Romanos, G.E. Influence of involuntary cigarette smoke inhalation on osseointegration: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 47, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Delgado-Ruiz, R.A.; Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; Romanos, G.E. Critical size defects for bone regeneration experiments in rabbit calvariae: Systematic review and quality evaluation using ARRIVE guidelines. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2015, 26, 915–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hooijmans, C.R.; Rovers, M.M.; de Vries, R.B.; Leenaars, M.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.; Langendam, M.W. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schwarzer, G. meta: An R Package for Meta-Analysis. R News 2007, 7, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  31. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sterne, J.A.C.; Sutton, A.J.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Terrin, N.; Jones, D.R.; Lau, J.; Carpenter, J.; Rücker, G.; Harbord, R.M.; Schmid, C.H.; et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chae, H.S.; Park, H.-J.; Hwang, H.R.; Kwon, A.; Lim, W.-H.; Yi, W.J.; Han, D.-H.; Kim, Y.H.; Baek, J.-H. The effect of antioxidants on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and orthodontic tooth movement. Mol. Cells 2011, 32, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Matsuda, Y.; Minagawa, T.; Okui, T.; Yamazaki, K. Resveratrol suppresses the alveolar bone resorption induced by artificial trauma from occlusion in mice. Oral Dis. 2018, 24, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kara, M.; Kesim, S.; Aral, C.A.; Elmalı, F. Effect of Grape Seed Extract Upon Plasma Oxidative Status and Alveolar Bone, in Ligature Induced Periodontitis. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2013, 27, 4131–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Zare Javid, A.; Hormoznejad, R.; Yousefimanesh, H.A.; Zakerkish, M.; Haghighi-zadeh, M.H.; Dehghan, P.; Ravanbakhsh, M. The Impact of Resveratrol Supplementation on Blood Glucose, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Triglyceride, and Periodontal Markers in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Chronic Periodontitis. Phyther. Res. 2017, 31, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Casati, M.Z.; Algayer, C.; Cardoso da Cruz, G.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Casarin, R.C.V.; Pimentel, S.P.; Cirano, F.R. Resveratrol Decreases Periodontal Breakdown and Modulates Local Levels of Cytokines During Periodontitis in Rats. J. Periodontol. 2013, 84, e58–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tamaki, N.; Cristina Orihuela-Campos, R.; Inagaki, Y.; Fukui, M.; Nagata, T.; Ito, H.-O. Resveratrol improves oxidative stress and prevents the progression of periodontitis via the activation of the Sirt1/AMPK and the Nrf2/antioxidant defense pathways in a rat periodontitis model. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 75, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cirano, F.R.; Casarin, R.C.V.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Casati, M.Z.; Pimentel, S.P.; Taiete, T.; Bernardi, M.M. Effect of Resveratrol on periodontal pathogens during experimental periodontitis in rats. Braz. Oral Res. 2016, 30, e128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ribeiro, F.V.; Pino, D.S.; Franck, F.C.; Benatti, B.B.; Tenenbaum, H.; Davies, J.E.; Pimentel, S.P.; Casarin, R.C.; Cirano, F.R.; Casati, M.Z. Resveratrol Inhibits Periodontitis-Related Bone Loss in Rats Subjected to Cigarette Smoke Inhalation. J. Periodontol. 2017, 88, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Corrêa, M.G.; Pires, P.R.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Pimentel, S.Z.; Casarin, R.C.V.; Cirano, F.R.; Tenenbaum, H.T.; Casati, M.Z. Systemic treatment with resveratrol and/or curcumin reduces the progression of experimental periodontitis in rats. J. Periodontal Res. 2017, 52, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Corrêa, M.G.; Pires, P.R.; Ribeiro, F.V.; Pimentel, S.P.; Cirano, F.R.; Napimoga, M.H.; Casati, M.Z.; Casarin, R.C.V. Systemic treatment with resveratrol reduces the progression of experimental periodontitis and arthritis in rats. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0204414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chin, Y.-T.; Hsieh, M.-T.; Lin, C.-Y.; Kuo, P.-J.; Yang, Y.-C.S.H.; Shih, Y.-J.; Lai, H.-Y.; Cheng, G.-Y.; Tang, H.-Y.; Lee, C.-C.; et al. 2,3,5,4’-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-glucoside Isolated from Polygoni Multiflori Ameliorates the Development of Periodontitis. Mediators Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 6953459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ikeda, E.; Ikeda, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fine, N.; Sheikh, Z.; Viniegra, A.; Barzilay, O.; Ganss, B.; Tenenbaum, H.C.; Glogauer, M. Resveratrol derivative-rich melinjo seed extract induces healing in a murine model of established periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mokni, M.; Elkahoui, S.; Limam, F.; Amri, M.; Aouani, E. Effect of Resveratrol on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in the Brain of Healthy Rat. Neurochem. Res. 2007, 32, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cochran, D.L. Inflammation and Bone Loss in Periodontal Disease. J. Periodontol. 2008, 79, 1569–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  47. Liu, C.; Mo, L.; Niu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Xu, X. The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and Autophagy in Periodontitis and Their Potential Linkage. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Walle, T.; Hsieh, F.; DeLegge, M.H.; Oatis, J.E.; Walle, U.K. High absorption but very low bioavailability of oral resveratrol in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004, 32, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ilango, P.; Mahalingam, A.; Parthasarathy, H.; Katamreddy, V.; Subbareddy, V. Evaluation of TLR2 and 4 in Chronic Periodontitis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dessaune Neto, N.; Porpino, M.T.M.; Antunes, H.d.S.; Rodrigues, R.C.V.; Perez, A.R.; Pires, F.R.; Siqueira, J.F., Jr.; Armada, L.; Dessaune Neto, N.; Porpino, M.T.M.; et al. Pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine expression in post-treatment apical periodontitis. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2018, 26, e20170455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oz, H.S.; Puleo, D.A. Animal Models for Periodontal Disease. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. Theodoro, L.H.; Pires, J.R.; Fernandes, L.A.; Gualberto Júnior, E.C.; Longo, M.; de Almeida, J.M.; Garcia, V.G. Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on periodontally infected tooth sockets in rats. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rovin, S.; Costich, E.R.; Gordon, H.A. The influence of bacteria and irritation in the initiation of periodontal disease in germfree and conventional rats. J. Periodontal Res. 1966, 1, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arora, H.; Ivanovski, S. Melatonin as a pro-osteogenic agent in oral implantology: a systematic review of histomorphometric outcomes in animals and quality evaluation using ARRIVE guidelines. J. Periodontal Res. 2017, 52, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dereka, X.; Calciolari, E.; Donos, N.; Mardas, N. Osseointegration in osteoporotic-like condition: A systematic review of preclinical studies. J. Periodontal Res. 2018, 53, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Osorio Parra, M.M.; Elangovan, S.; Lee, C.-T. Specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators in experimental periodontitis: A systematic review. Oral Dis. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, B.; Xu, J.; Wu, W.; Liu, H.; Kou, C.; Liu, N.; Zhao, L. Survey of basic medical researchers on the awareness of animal experimental designs and reporting standards in China. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0174530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A flowchart of the studies selection.
Figure 1. A flowchart of the studies selection.
Nutrients 11 00953 g001
Figure 2. A forest plot of the meta-analysis for seven preclinical studies evaluating alveolar bone loss (cementoenamel junction distance to the bone crest) in methylene blue stain rat samples.
Figure 2. A forest plot of the meta-analysis for seven preclinical studies evaluating alveolar bone loss (cementoenamel junction distance to the bone crest) in methylene blue stain rat samples.
Nutrients 11 00953 g002
Table 1. The main features of the selected preclinical studies.
Table 1. The main features of the selected preclinical studies.
Author and Year of PublicationAnimal Model (Age at Beginning of Study)Groups (n/Group) Characteristics of Periodontitis Induction ProtocolTime of PD InductionLigature PermanenceRoute of Resveratrol AdministrationResveratrol Dose Main Outcomes
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [42]Male Wistar rats (NC)1: PD + smoke inhalation + placebo (13)
2: PD + smoke inhalation + resveratrol (13)
Cotton ligature around both mandibular first and second maxillar molars.26 days after beginning experiment. 11 daysGavage10 mg/kg of body weight 30 days (entire experiment).Resveratrol reduced both ABL and gingival NADPH oxidase as well increased tissue levels of SIRT1 and SOD1.
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [20] Male Wistar rats (NC)1: PD + experimental arthritis + placebo (12).
2: PD + experimental arthritis + ibuprofen (12).
3: PD + experimental arthritis + resveratrol (12).
Cotton ligature around mandibular first molars.At beginning of experiment30 daysGavage10 mg/kg of body weight during 30 days (entire experiment).Resveratrol treatment decreased ABL and increased serum IL-4 levels.
IKEDA et al. (2018) [44] Male C57BL/6J wild-type mice (6–7 weeks old)1: PD + placebo (NC)
2: PD treatment + placebo (NC)
3: PD + resveratrol (NC)
4: PD treatment + resveratrol (NC)
Silk suture around the gingival sulcus of the maxillar second molar. In PD treatment group ligature was removed 15 days before finishing the experiment. At beginning of experiment15 days in PD treatment group. In the other groups ligature remained 17, 20, and 22 days.IntraperitonealSingle dose 0.001% (w/w) of body weight on day 14.Resveratrol decreased ABL, IL-1β, and oxidative stress Production of osteoclasts was inhibited by resveratrol.
CORRÊA et al. (2017) [41]Male Wistar Rats (10 weeks old)1: PD + placebo (10).
2: PD + resveratrol (10).
3: PD + curcumin (10).
4: PD + resveratrol + curcumin (10).
Cotton ligature around mandibular first molars.At beginning of experiment30 daysGavage10 mg/kg of body weight during 30 days (entire experiment).Resveratrol decreased ABL and gingival IFN-γ. Resveratrol increased gingival IL-4.
RIBEIRO et al. (2017) [40]Male Wistar rats (10 weeks old)1: Control + placebo (20)
2: PD + smoke inhalation + placebo (20)
3: PD + smoke inhalation + resveratrol (20)
Cotton ligature around both first mandibular molar and second maxillar molar.19 days after beginning experiment11 daysGavage10 mg/kg of body weight during 30 days (entire experiment). Resveratrol reduced linear ABL and increased interradicular bone density. It also reduced expression of RANKL and Th17/Th2 levels whereas increased serum levels of IL-4.
BHATTARAI et al. (2016) [21]Male Sprague–DawleyRats (NC)1: Sham (5)
2: Control + DMSO (5)
3: PD + DMSO (5)
4: PD + Resveratrol (5)
Elastic ligature between first and second maxillary molars and received 20 µl of 1 mg/mL LPS three times/week into the palatal gingivae At beginning of experiment14 daysSubcutaneous 5 mg/kg of body weight during 14 days (entire experiment).Resveratrol attenuated ABL soft tissue damage and inhibited osteoclast formation. It also reduced COX-2, MMP-2, and MMP-9 levels. Resveratrol increased bone mineral density and SOD activity.
CHIN et al. (2016) [43]Male Sprague–Dawley rats (8 weeks old)1: control (10)
2: PD (10)
3: PD + 0.1 mg/kg/day of THSG (5)
4: PD + 10 mg/kg/day of THSG (5)
5: PD + resveratrol (5)
6: PD + 12.5 mg/kg/day of P. multiflora ethanol extracts (5)
7: PD + 25 mg/kg/day of P. multiflora ethanol extracts (5)
8: PD + 50 mg/kg/d of P. multiflora ethanol extracts (5)
Silk sutures around mandibular first molarsAt beginning of experiment 8 daysGavage25mg/kg of body weight during 7 days.Resveratrol treatment did not alter significantly (p = 0.054) periodontal bone-supporting ratio.
CIRANO et al. (2016) [39]Male Wistar rats (10 weeks old)1: Control (PD) + placebo (12)
2: PD + resveratrol (12)
Cotton ligature around first mandibular molar.19 days after beginning experiment11 daysGavage10 mg/kg of body weight during 30 days (entire experiment).Resveratrol treatment did not alter concentrations of Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Tannerella forsythia in rats’ ligatures.
ZHEN et al. (2015) [19] C57BLKS/J-db/db male mice (6–8 weeks old)1: Untreated control (10)
2: PD + placebo (10) 3: PD + resveratrol (10)
Cotton ligature presoaked in a medium containing Porphyromonas gingivalis (108/mL) around maxillar first molars.At beginning of experiment28 daysGavage20 mg/kg of body weight during 28 days (entire experiment).Resveratrol decreased ABL and decreased IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels. The expression downstream signaling activation of TLR4 was attenuated.
TAMAKI et al. (2014) [38]Male Wistar Rats (8 weeks old)1: Control + water (6)
2: PD + water (6)
3: PD + resveratrol (6)
Ligature of thread placed around the right second molar of maxilla. At beginning of experiment20 daysOral10 mg/kg of body weight of melinjo resveratrol during 20 days (entire experiment). Resveratrol ABL and activated the Sirt1/AMPK and the Nrf2/antioxidant defense pathways in inflamed gingival tissues. Resveratrol inhibits the NF-κB/MAPK pathway and lowered both serum IL-6 and TNF-α.
CASATI et al. (2013) [37]Male Wistar Rats (10 weeks old)1: PD + placebo (12)
2: PD + resveratrol (12)
Cotton ligature around mandibular first molar. 19 days after beginning experiment11 daysGavage10 mg/Kg of body weight during 30 days (entire experiment).Lower ABL and lower levels of IL-1β and IL-17 in resveratrol treated group.
Abbreviations: NC: Not clear. ABL: Alveolar bone loss. DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide. MMP: Matrix metalloproteinases. IL: Interleukin. TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor-α. COX-2: Cyclooxygenase-2. SOD: Superoxide dismutase: NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphatase oxidase. SIRT1: Sirtuin 1. IFN-γ: Interferon gamma. RANKL: Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand. TRL: Toll-like receptor.
Table 2. A reduction of the bone loss in rodents with periodontal disease and treated with resveratrol.
Table 2. A reduction of the bone loss in rodents with periodontal disease and treated with resveratrol.
StudyStrainResveratrol DoseABL Evaluation MethodABL% Reductionp Value
Ligated with ResveratrolLigated without Resveratrol
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [42] #Wistar rats10 mg/kgMeasurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens1.48 mm1.61 mm8.07%0.0001
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [20] ¥Wistar rats10 mg/kgMeasurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens0.75 mm *1.01 mm *25.45%<0.05
IKEDA et al. (2018) [44]C57BL/6J wild-type miceSingle dose (intraperitoneal)Measurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens65.00 µm *165.00 µm *60.60%<0.01
CORRÊA et al. (2017) [41]Wistar rats10 mg/kgMeasurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens1.31 mm1.41 mm7.09%<0.05
RIBEIRO et al. (2017) [40] ¥Wistar rats10 mg/kgMeasurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens0.12 mm *0.15 mm *20.00%<0.05
BHATTARAI et al. (2016) [21]Sprague–Dawley rats5 mg/kg (subcutaneous)Measurement of cementoenamel junction distance in hematoxylin and eosin stained slices.55.00 µm *130.00 µm *57.69%<0.05
Measurement of bone mineral density in Micro CT specimens.0.24 g/cm3 *0.29 g/cm3 *17.24%
CHIN et al. (2016) [43]Sprague–Dawley rats25 mg/kgMeasurement of loss of periodontal bone-supporting ratio along the distal root surface junction in radiographic images of mandibles.60.00% *70.00%*10.00%<0.05
CIRANO et al. (2016) [39]Wistar Rats10 mg/kgDon’t evaluated bone loss----
ZHEN et al. (2015) [19]C57BLKS/J-db/db mice20 mg/kgMeasurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens0.19 mm *0.31 mm *−38.70%<0.05
TAMAKI et al. (2014) [38]Wistar rats10 mg/kgMeasurement of distance from the cementoenamel junction to the alveolar bone crest in Micro CT specimens.0.038 mm *0.054 mm *−29.63%<0.001
CASATI et al. (2013) [37]Wistar rats10 mg/kgMeasurement of cementoenamel junction distance in methylene blue stain specimens.0.61 mm *0.71 mm *−14.08%<0.05
# Animals of both groups induced to periodontitis and arthritis. ¥ Animals of both groups submitted to cigarette smoke inhalation. * Values estimated by graphic data.
Table 3. An assessment of the risk of bias in the included studies.
Table 3. An assessment of the risk of bias in the included studies.
STUDIESABCDEFGHIJ
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [42]-+--??++++
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [20]++-???+?++
IKEDA et al. (2018) [44]+?-?---?++
CORRÊA et al. (2017) [41]++-???++++
RIBEIRO et al. (2017) [40]-+-----?+?
BHATTARAI et al. (2016) [21]++-?---+++
CHIN et al. (2016) [43]---?---???
CIRANO et al. (2016) [39]-+--+?+?++
ZHEN et al. (2015) [19]++-?---?++
TAMAKI et al. (2014) [38]++-?---+++
CASATI et al. (2013) [37]++-???++++
A: Sequence generation. B: Baseline characteristics. C: Allocation concealment. D: Random housing. E: Blinding of participants and personnel. F: Random outcome assessment. G: Blinding of outcome assessment. H: Incomplete outcome data. I: Selective outcome reporting. J: Other bias. +: Yes (Low risk of bias). ?:Unclear. -: No (High risk of bias).
Table 4. The scores of the quality assessment according the Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiment (ARRIVE) guidelines of the included studies.
Table 4. The scores of the quality assessment according the Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiment (ARRIVE) guidelines of the included studies.
Studies ARRIVE Items
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTTotal
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [42]1111222221122122212232
CORRÊA et al. (2018) [20]1211222221122112212030
IKEDA et al. (2018) [44]1110211202122122112126
CORRÊA et al. (2017) [41]1211221221122112212231
RIBEIRO et al. (2017) [40]1111212211122112212229
BHATTARAI et al. (2016) [21]1111211211122122212229
CHIN et al. (2016) [43]0110211211111010011218
CIRANO et al. (2016) [39]1111222221122110122229
ZHEN et al. (2015) [19]1211221221122122112231
TAMAKI et al. (2014) [38]1211211222122122112231
CASATI et al. (2013) [37]1111211211122112212228
Category Score (Quality Obtained)101510920151420151210202010151816112017-
Maximum Score Expected (Quality Expected)1122221122222222222211222211222222222222-
Ratio Quality Score/Maximum Score0.910.680.500.821.00.720.681.00.720.591.00.950.950.910.720.820.720.540.950.86-
A: title. B: abstract. C: introduction-background. D: introduction-objectives. E: methods-ethical statement. F: study design. G: experimental procedure. H: Experimental animals. I: housing and husbandry. J: sample size. K: allocation. L: experimental outcomes. M: statistics. N: results-baseline data. O: number analyzed. P: outcome, and estimation. Q: adverse events. R: discussion-interpretation/scientific implications. S: general applicability/relevance. T: funding. Total: represents total score obtained by each manuscript out of a maximum of 36 points.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop