Next Article in Journal
Predictors of Lifestyle Intervention Attrition or Weight Loss Success in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Who Are Overweight or Obese
Next Article in Special Issue
Differences and Similarities between Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels in Europe: A Comparison of Functional and Visual Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
The Type of Dietary Fat in an Isocaloric Breakfast Meal Does Not Modify Postprandial Metabolism in Overweight/Obese Pregnant Women
Previous Article in Special Issue
Setting Policy Priorities for Front-of-Pack Health Claims and Symbols in the European Union: Expert Consensus Built by Using a Delphi Method
Open AccessArticle

The Effect of Randomly Providing Nutri-Score Information on Actual Purchases in Colombia

1
INCAE Business School, Campus Walter Kissling Gam, 2 km West of Vivero Proceso No. 1, La Garita, Alajuela 960-4050, Costa Rica
2
Department of Nutrition and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 #43-92, Office 504, Bogotá, D.C. 110231, Colombia
3
Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 #40B-36, 4th Floor, Bogotá, D.C. 110231, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2019, 11(3), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030491
Received: 22 December 2018 / Revised: 8 February 2019 / Accepted: 11 February 2019 / Published: 26 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label and Public Health)
Recently, front-of-package (FOP) food labeling systems have captured the attention of researchers and policy makers. Several Latin American governments are currently considering employing different FOP labeling systems. However, there is much need for more research-based evidence in these countries. In this paper, we study whether food-purchasing decisions and the nutritional qualities of those purchases are influenced by randomly informing some customers and not others about an FOP label known as Nutri-Score. We also separate the information effect from the effect of being aware of the system. We combined a randomized field intervention in a university cafeteria in Bogotá, Colombia with data from an after-purchase survey and receipts. We found that randomly providing information on Nutri-Score increased total expenditure by $0.18. Additional spending on healthier items was 21% or $0.26 higher, with no change for less healthy items. Expenditure estimates were higher among customers who were aware of the system’s existence. Customers in the study were also 10% more likely to buy a healthier item than control customers were, and the concentration of protein in their purchases was greater. Information on the Nutri-Score system increased the store’s sales. This potential financial incentive may facilitate the implementation of Nutri-Score. View Full-Text
Keywords: randomized field intervention; food labeling; Nutri-Score; store sales randomized field intervention; food labeling; Nutri-Score; store sales
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mora-García, C.A.; Tobar, L.F.; Young, J.C. The Effect of Randomly Providing Nutri-Score Information on Actual Purchases in Colombia. Nutrients 2019, 11, 491.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop