Next Article in Journal
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in PEMT and MTHFR Genes are Associated with Omega 3 and 6 Fatty Acid Levels in the Red Blood Cells of Children with Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
The Usefulness of Anthropometric Indices to Identify the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome

Nutrients 2019, 11(11), 2599; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112599

Review
Effect of High-Dose Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
1
Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2
Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa, 252-0883 Kanagawa, Japan
3
OmegaQuant Analytics, LLC and Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD 57106, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 September 2019 / Accepted: 25 October 2019 / Published: 30 October 2019

Abstract

:
A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT), reported that high-dose marine omega-3 fatty acids (OM3) significantly reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, yet the mechanisms responsible for this benefit remain unknown. To test the hypothesis that high-dose OM3 is anti-atherosclerotic, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT of high-dose OM3 on atherosclerosis. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019125566). PubMed, Embase, Cochran Central Register for Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched using the following criteria: adult participants, high-dose OM3 (defined as ≥3.0 g/day, or in Japan 1.8 g/day and purity ≥90%) as the intervention, changes in atherosclerosis as the outcome, and RCTs with an intervention duration of ≥6 months. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates across studies. Among the 598 articles retrieved, six articles met our criteria. Four RCTs evaluated atherosclerosis in the coronary and two in the carotid arteries. High-dose OM3 significantly slowed the progression of atherosclerosis (standardized mean difference −1.97, 95% confidence interval −3.01, −0.94, p < 0.001). The results indicate that anti-atherosclerotic effect of high-dose OM3 is one potential mechanism in reducing CVD outcomes demonstrated in the REDUCE-IT trial.
Keywords:
Marine omega-3 fatty acids; atherosclerosis; high-dose; meta-analysis; systematic review; randomized clinical trial; mechanism

1. Introduction

A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 4 g/day of marine omega3 fatty acids (OM3), specifically 4 g/day of icosapent ethyl (3.84 g/day of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)) on cardiovascular disease (CVD), the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT), showed a significant 25% relative risk reduction in CVD outcomes compared to the control group. The REDUCE-IT trial was conducted among 8,179 statin-treated patients with CVD or diabetes and with high triglycerides (TG) and low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [1]. This result is in striking contrast to the results of recent RCTs of low-dose (≤1 g/day) OM3 that showed no significant effect of OM3 on CVD outcomes in a variety of groups: subjects with CVD (Alpha-Omega [2] and Supplementation en Folates et Omeag-3 [3]), without CVD (Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial [4]), with multiple CVD risk factors (Risk and Prevention Study [5]), diabetes (A Study of Cardiovascular Events iN Diabetes [6]), or glucose intolerance (the Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention [7]). The rationale for the dosage of REDUCE-IT (4.0 g/day of OM3) was to mimic the blood levels of OM3 observed in the intervention group in the Japan eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS), [1,8] an RCT in Japan of EPA alone that showed a significant 19% relative risk reduction in CVD outcomes compared to the control group in 18,645 statin-treated subjects with and without CVD [9]. JELIS used 1.8 g/day of OM3, equivalent to 3.6 g/day of OM3 in the US, due to the very high dietary intake of OM3 in Japan [8]. These results indicate that high- but not low-dose OM3 reduces CVD outcomes.
Neither REDUCE-IT [1] nor JELIS [9] has directly tested the mechanism of high-dose OM3. OM3 has varying effects on traditional risk factors (blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TG, etc.). These effects are modest at best, even with a high-dose OM3 (4 g/day) [10,11] except for lowering TG among patients with high TG [12]. However, the significant reduction in CVD outcomes in these two trials does not depend on baseline TG levels [1,9], suggest that lowering TG is unlikely to be a major mechanism of high-dose OM3 in reducing CVD outcomes. In fact, REDUCE-IT investigators recently reported that the cardiovascular benefits were primarily tied to non-TG-related effects [13]. OM3 has other effects on the cardiovascular system, including anti-atherosclerotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and anti-arrhythmic properties [12,14,15]. Investigators of the REDUCE-IT trial discussed that the benefit of high-dose OM3 seen in this trial was due in part to the anti-atherosclerotic and anti-inflammatory properties [1]. They also speculated that the benefit was not due to anti-thrombotic or anti-arrhythmic properties [1]. This speculation is in accordance with recent reviews that anti-thrombotic or anti-arrhythmic properties are unlikely pathways of high-dose OM3 (4 g/day) for reducing CVD outcomes [12,16].
A recent RCT in the US of 3.4 g/day of OM3 in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) reported slower progression of coronary plaques [17]. Moreover, three RCTs of 1.8 g/day of OM3 in Japan (equivalent to 3.6 g/day of OM3 in the US) showed significantly slower progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with CHD in the intervention group as compared to the control group [18,19,20]. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs has been conducted on the effect of high-dose OM3 on atherosclerosis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we hypothesized that high-dose OM3 significantly slows the progression of atherosclerosis.

2. Materials and Methods

This article has been reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [21]. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019125566). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted from the earliest publication date through March 1, 2019. The reference lists of included studies in the search were also screened for additional studies. The search strategies are available in Tables S1 and S2. After removal of duplicates, the titles and abstracts were retrieved by five authors (AS, CC, DS, XZ, WH) to select relevant studies. Then, full-texts were independently retrieved by pairs of authors (AS, CC, DS, XZ) and the final list of studies was determined by discussion, including minor differences being resolved with another author (AF).
The studies included were RCTs (1) conducted among adults (≥18 years) without hemodialysis, (2) using high-dose OM3 supplements (defined as ≥3 g/day of OM3 or ≥1.8 g/day of OM3 in Japan) with purity of OM3 ≥90% as the intervention, (3) using atherosclerosis as the primary outcome, (4) reporting percent or absolute change of atherosclerosis, (5) with the intervention period ≥6 months, and (6) with articles published and available in full-text English language.
The data extracted from each selected RCT included characteristics and demographics (first author, publication year, study location, study design, etc.), baseline participant’ characteristics (total sample size, age, health condition, etc.), dose and purity of OM3, duration of intervention, methods to assess atherosclerosis, baseline and post-pre-intervention change in atherosclerosis, and net difference in change of atherosclerosis. Only the primary outcome was extracted when multiple endpoints were reported.
Risk of bias assessment was evaluated independently by four investigators (AS, CC, DS, and XZ) using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias across seven domains (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other source of bias) [22]. The judgment of high, low, or unclear risk of bias was assigned for each item. When more than four domains were regarded as high quality, the study was considered to be at low risk.

Statistical analysis

Mean change from baseline of atherosclerotic measurements was calculated for the treatment and control groups, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was computed as the measure of effect [23]. The pooled SMD across studies (with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) was calculated based on a random effect model:
S M D =   X t r e a t m e n t ¯   X c o n t r o l ¯ S p o o l e d ,
where
S p o o l e d = ( n t r e a t m e n t 1 ) S t r e a t m e n t 2 + ( n c o n t r o l 1 ) S c o n t r o l 2 n t r e a t m e n t + n c o n t r o l   .
For studies where the mean change and standard deviation (SD) was not available, SMD was estimated using the median change, interquartile range (IQR), and sample size [24,25]. For results in which positive values represented improvement (e.g., fibrous cap thickness), the estimate was multiplied by −1 to make the direction of the result consistent with the results of other RCTs. Heterogeneity of the studies was assessed with the I2 statistic to describe the percentage of variation across each study that may be due to heterogeneity rather than chance. In addition, a funnel plot was generated to identify potential publication bias or systematic heterogeneity. Because we detected significant heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses were performed by removing the most influential study followed by removing the next influential study.
To assess whether the effect of OM3 on atherosclerosis differed by study characteristics, a subgroup analysis was conducted by location (Japan vs. other countries), site of atherosclerosis (coronary vs. carotid arteries), placebo-controlled (yes vs. no), CHD (yes vs. no), statin use (yes vs. no), source of OM3 (EPA only vs. EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)), and risk of bias (high vs. low). All analyses were conducted with Cochrane Review Manager 5.3 [23]. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Subgroup analyses were assessed with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

3. Results

Of the 598 articles retrieved, 12 studies were identified that met our review criteria. Among the 12 RCTs, six were RCTs of high-dose OM3 with purity of OM3 ≥90% and were included in the analysis (Figure 1) [17,18,19,20,26,27]. These trials were published as early as 2006 but most were published in 2016 and 2017 (Table 1). These RCTs were conducted in Japan (n = 4), the US (n = 1) and the UK (n = 1). The participants (a total of 693, 71% male) were patients with CHD (n = 4), [17,18,19,20] type 2 diabetes (n = 1) [26] or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 1) [27]. Participants in four RCTs were treated with a statin. Only one study was placebo-controlled and the other five were open-label trials with no placebo. The dose of OM3 ranged from 1.8 to 3.36 g/day. All the four RCTs conducted in Japan used highly-purified EPA [18,19,20,26] whereas the other three studies used a combination of EPA and DHA [17,27]. The average follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 30 months (Table 1).
The four RCTs that recruited patients with CHD evaluated atherosclerosis in the coronary artery using various methods (coronary computed tomography angiography [17], intravascular ultrasound [19,20], and optical, coherence tomography [18]) (Table 2). The primary outcome differed for each RCT (% change in non-calcified plaque volume [17], change in lipid plaque volume [19], change in fibrous-cap thickness [18], and change in normalized total atheroma volume [20]). Two RCTs that recruited non-alcoholic fatty acid disease [27] or type 2 diabetes [26] evaluated atherosclerosis in the carotid artery with B-mode ultrasound. One RCT used change in mean intima-media thickness (IMT) [27] whereas another study used change in max IMT of the carotid artery [26] as the primary outcome. These four RCTs documented that the OM3 significantly slowed the progression of atherosclerosis as compared to the control group [18,19,20,26] (Table 2).
Three out of the six trials were considered to have high risk of bias (score <5) (Table 3). They were open label trials without placebo. Two of the three trials did not provide enough information on random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and selective outcome reporting.
Overall, OM3 significantly slowed the progression of atherosclerosis (SMD −1.97, 95% confident interval (95%CI) −3.01, −0.94: p < 0.001). A significant heterogeneity was observed across these studies (I2 = 97%, p < 0.001) (Figure 2). Our sensitivity analysis showed that after excluding the most influential study, OM3 significantly slowed the progression (SMD −1.17 95% CI −1.99, −0.34: p = 0.006.) After further excluding the next influential study, the effect was attenuated and became non-significant (SMD −0.65 95% CI −1.33, 0.03: p = 0.06) (Figure 3).
In subgroup analysis, the effect of OM3 on atherosclerosis differed significantly by study location (Japan vs. other countries), site of atherosclerosis (coronary vs. carotid arteries), use of placebo (placebo-controlled trials vs. trials without placebo), presence of CHD (yes vs. no), statin use (yes vs. no), and source of OM3 (EPA vs. a combination of EPA and DHA). However, the subgroup analysis showed that the effect was not significantly different by risk of bias (high vs. low) (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis of six RCTs involving 693 participants demonstrated that randomization to high-dose OM3 supplementation significantly slowed the progression of atherosclerosis as compared to a control group. Although a significant heterogeneity was observed across these six RCTs, after removing the most influential study, the effect of high-dose OM3 on atherosclerosis remained significant, which was attenuated and became non-significant (p = 0.06) after further excluding the second influential study.
Studies in basic science have shown that OM3 is anti-atherosclerotic through various molecular mechanisms [28,29]. Preclinical studies document that OM3 slows the progression of atherosclerosis in mice, [30,31,32,33,34] swine [35], and monkey [36]. However, observational studies in humans have shown mixed results. Generally, studies in Western countries reported that dietary intake or blood levels of OM3 show no significant associations with atherosclerosis. The Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community Study [37] and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) [38] in the US report that dietary intake or blood levels of OM3 have no significant association with carotid IMT. Likewise, the Rotterdam Study in the Netherlands [39] and MESA [38] report no significant association of dietary intake of OM3 with coronary artery calcification (CAC), a well-established biomarker of coronary atherosclerosis [40]. On the other hand, studies in Japan show that dietary intake or blood levels of OM3 have a significant inverse association with IMT [41] and CAC [42]. Notably, we have reported from our international population-based study in Japan and the US that blood levels of OM3 are >100% higher in Japanese and a significant inverse association of blood levels of OM3 with IMT is observed only in Japanese and not in Americans [43]. Collectively, these observations suggest that high but not low levels of OM3 are anti-atherosclerotic.
We excluded RCTs of OM3 with purity of OM3 <90% according to a recent review paper on the differential effect of EPA and DHA on cardiometabolic factors [44]. In the process, we identified five RCTs that administered low-dose OM3 (dose <3 g/day) with purity of OM3 <90% [45,46,47,48,49] (Table S3). Characteristics of participants in these trials were similar to those in high-dose trials (patients with CHD or dyslipidemia). The duration of intervention was somewhat longer in these trials (12 to 50 months) compared to the high-dose trials (6 to 28 months). The dose of OM3 ranged from 0.84 to 2.52 g/day. Changes in atherosclerosis were assessed in the carotid artery using ultrasound (n = 3) and in the coronary artery by intra-vascular ultrasound (n = 1) and quantitative coronary angiography (n = 1) (Table S4). None of these studies showed any significant difference in change in atherosclerosis between the intervention and control groups (Table S5). Furthermore, synthesizing the data from these five studies showed no significant effect of low-dose OM3 (SMD 0.02 95% CI −0.08, 0.13, p = 0.64) (Figure S1). This observation further supports the notion that a high but not low dose of OM3 is anti-atherosclerotic in humans.
In our subgroup analysis, the effect of high-dose OM3 was significantly different in six of seven categories even after the Bonferroni correction (study location, site of atherosclerosis, use of placebo, statin use, presence of CHD, and source of OM3). The results were largely due to four RCTs conducted in Japan that administered 1.8 g/day of EPA without placebo and reported significantly slower progression of atherosclerosis [18,19,20,26] and three RCTs that evaluated coronary arteries of patients with CHD who were on statins [18,19,20]. Therefore, whether the effect of high-dose OM3 differs in relationship to these factors remain unknown. However, because both JELIS (1.8 g/day of EPA) in Japan [9] and REDUCE-IT (4.0 g/day of icosapent ethyl (3.84 g/day of EPA)) primarily in Western countries [1] showed significant relative risk reduction in CVD outcomes, it is unlikely that the effect is different by study location.
A recent review on the interaction between statin and OM3 reports that statin and OM3 have both synergistic and antagonistic effects [50]. Both statin and OM3 have pleiotropic effects which overlap. Statins are standard therapy for both secondary and primary prevention of CVD and high-dose OM3 is considered to be an add-on therapy to statins based on the results of JELIS and REDUCE-IT (both of which show that high-dose OM3 is effective in reducing CVD outcome in statin-treated patients). Whether high-dose OM3 reduces CVD outcomes without statin-treatment remains to be answered.
There is strong evidence that use of EPA alone without DHA significantly reduces CVD outcomes [1,9] and slows the progression of atherosclerosis [18,19,20,26]. The investigators of REDUCE-IT have stated that the results may not be extrapolated into a combination of EPA and DHA because DHA but not EPA raises LDL-C. In fact, two meta-analyses have reported that a combination of EPA and DHA raises LDL-C by 5 mg/dL [51,52]. However, the American Heart Association Science Advisory on OM3 for the management of hypertriglyceridemia recently reported that EPA or a combination of EPA and DHA does not increase LDL-C in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia (TG levels of 2.26–5.64 mmol/L) although a combination of EPA and DHA may increase LDL-C among individuals with very high TG (above 5.65 mmol/L) [53]. In this regard, the results of the Outcomes Study to Assess Statin Residual Risk Reduction with EpaNova in HiGh CV risk PatienTs with Hypertryglyceridemia (STRENGTH) are awaited, an ongoing trial of a combination of high-dose EPA and DHA on CVD outcomes in approximately 13,000 patients with hypertriglyceridemia [54].
Several RCTs have reported the effect of high-dose EPA or DHA on CVD risk factors including lipids and lipoproteins [55,56,57,58]. As compared to EPA, DHA significantly decreases TG, [57,58] increases LDL particle size, [55] LDL-C [57], and HDL-C [55,57] while the effect on apolipoprotein B is similar [57]. Interestingly, one of these RCTs showed that, as compared to EPA, DHA is more effective in modulating biomarkers of inflammation [57]. However, no RCTs including ongoing trials are testing the effect of DHA alone on vascular outcomes (e.g., atherosclerosis or CVD).
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease [59]. Both innate and adaptive immunities are involved in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis through plaque rupture [60]. OM3 has anti-inflammatory properties that have been applied to treating inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease [61]. Although reviewing the potential mechanisms linking OM3 and its anti-atherosclerotic properties through its anti-inflammatory effects is beyond the scope of the current paper, we describe several potential mechanisms. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are general biomarkers of inflammation in innate immunity and are independent predictors of future CVD events [62]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis shows that administration of OM3 significantly reduces low-grade inflammation assessed by IL-6 and CRP in middle-age and older adults [63]. Evidence for a role of ceramides in the etiology of atherosclerosis and CVD is rapidly accumulating [64,65,66]. Untargeted metabolomics identified a significant association of ceramides with CVD [67,68]. Several observational studies reported a significant association of plasma concentrations of ceramides with CVD events independent of traditional risk factors [69,70,71]. Ceramides promote LDL infiltration of the endothelial cells and are upregulated in response to inflammatory cytokines, e.g., IL-6 [65]. Preclinical studies show that OM3 reduces plasma ceramides [72,73,74]. Predominant T cells found in atherosclerotic plaque are type 1 helper T cells (Th1) [75], which are pro-inflammatory and a biomarker of adaptive immunity [60]. It was reported in MESA among 917 men and women in the US general population that Th1 bias had significant positive associations with both CAC and IMT [76]. Preclinical studies show that administration of OM3 reduces the differentiation of native T cells to Th1 [77].
OM3 is incorporated into the cell membrane, modulates local signaling, and exerts anti-inflammatory effects by competing with omega-6 fatty acid [15]. OM3 can be released through the action of phospholipase A2 and serve as substrates for cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase, giving rise to 3-series prostanoids (e.g., prostaglandin I3, thromboxane A3) and 5-series leukotrienes (e.g., leukotriene B5) [15]. Prostaglandin, thromboxane, and leukotriene derived from OM3 are much less potent mediators than corresponding omega-6 fatty acid derivatives, which generally have pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic effects. OM3 also exerts anti-inflammatory effects through promoting the resolution of inflammation [78]. OM3 is precursors of a series of lipid mediators including resolvins, protectins, and maresins [79], which are collectively named as specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPM) [80]. EPA- and DHA-derived SPMs are structurally different and interact with different receptors [81]. Administration of EPA alone without DHA in JELIS and REDUCE-IT showed a significant increase in plasma EPA but significant decrease in plasma DHA [82,83]. Thus, it may suggest that the clinical results observed with using EPA alone without DHA might be much enhanced if both EPA and DHA are administered.
All four of the studies that showed significantly slower progression of atherosclerosis were open label trials without placebo [18,19,20,26]. In this design, both investigators (physicians and staff) and participants knew the treatment assignment, which might affect the lifestyle of participants differently between the intervention and control groups. Notably, JELIS was also an open-label trial without placebo. However, the REDUCE-IT trial was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which showed a significant 25% relative reduction in CVD outcomes.
Another limitation of the current meta-analysis is the fact that various technologies were used to evaluate the progression of atherosclerosis. Thus, the significantly slower progression in the synthesized SMD must be interpreted with caution. Two meta-analyses showed that reduction in coronary plaque is significantly associated with lower CHD rates [84,85]. In our meta-analysis three out of four RCTs that evaluated changes in coronary plaque showed significant reduction [18,19,20]. Although one study showed no significant difference in the progression of coronary plaque (p = 0.14) [17] in their per-protocol analysis, the difference approached significance (p = 0.07). Progression of carotid IMT has been widely used as a surrogate marker of clinical outcomes [86,87]. However, two recent meta-analyses of RCTs reported inconsistent results [88,89].

5. Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs with high-dose OM3 on atherosclerosis documents that high-dose OM3 significantly slows the progression of atherosclerosis. The results suggest that anti-atherosclerotic properties of high-dose OM3 are one potential mechanism in reducing CVD outcomes that was demonstrated in a recent RCT of high-dose OM3 on CVD outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/11/2599/s1: Figure S1: Effect of low-dose marine omega-3 fatty acids on atherosclerosis; Table S1: Search strategy and number of articles retrieved in PubMed; Table S2: Search strategy and number of articles retrieved in Embase; Table S3: Characteristics of the trials with low-dose OM3; Table S4: Primary outcome of atherosclerosis and the result of each trial with low-dose OM3; Table S5: Risk of bias for trails with low-dose OM3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization (A.S., A.F., W.S.H.), Methodology (A.S., C.C., X.Z., D.S., A.F., W.S.H.), Data Curation (A.S., C.C., D.S., X.Z.), Formal Analysis (C.C., X.Z., D.S.), Project Administration (A.S., A.F.), Writing - Original Draft Preparation (A.S.), Writing - Review and Editing (C.C., D.S., A.F., W.S.H., X.Z.), Supervision (A.S., A.F., W.S.H.), Funding Acquisition (A.S.)

Funding

The study is funded by the National Institutes of Health grant: RF1AG051615.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhatt, D.L.; Steg, P.G.; Miller, M.; Brinton, E.A.; Jacobson, T.A.; Ketchum, S.B.; Doyle, R.T., Jr.; Juliano, R.A.; Jiao, L.; Granowitz, C.; et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kromhout, D.; Giltay, E.J.; Geleijnse, J.M. n–3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Events after Myocardial Infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 2015–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Galan, P.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Czernichow, S.; Briancon, S.; Blacher, J.; Hercberg, S. Effects of B vitamins and omega 3 fatty acids on cardiovascular diseases: A randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2010, 341, c6273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Manson, J.E.; Cook, N.R.; Lee, I.M.; Christen, W.; Bassuk, S.S.; Mora, S.; Gibson, H.; Albert, C.M.; Gordon, D.; Copeland, T.; et al. Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roncaglioni, M.C.; Tombesi, M.; Avanzini, F.; Barlera, S.; Caimi, V.; Longoni, P.; Marzona, I.; Milani, V.; Silletta, M.G.; Tognoni, G.; et al. n-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bowman, L.; Mafham, M.; Wallendszus, K.; Stevens, W.; Buck, G.; Barton, J.; Murphy, K.; Aung, T.; Haynes, R.; Cox, J.; et al. Effects of n-3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Diabetes Mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1540–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. The ORIGIN Trial Investigators. n-3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Dysglycemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bays, H.E.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Doyle, R.T., Jr.; Juliano, R.A.; Philip, S. Icosapent ethyl: Eicosapentaenoic acid concentration and triglyceride-lowering effects across clinical studies. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2016, 125, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yokoyama, M.; Origasa, H.; Matsuzaki, M.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Saito, Y.; Ishikawa, Y.; Oikawa, S.; Sasaki, J.; Hishida, H.; Itakura, H.; et al. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on major coronary events in hypercholesterolaemic patients (JELIS): A randomised open-label, blinded endpoint analysis. Lancet 2007, 369, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mori, T.A.; Bao, D.Q.; Burke, V.; Puddey, I.B.; Beilin, L.J. Docosahexaenoic acid but not eicosapentaenoic acid lowers ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in humans. Hypertension 1999, 34, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mori, T.A.; Bao, D.Q.; Burke, V.; Puddey, I.B.; Watts, G.F.; Beilin, L.J. Dietary fish as a major component of a weight-loss diet: Effect on serum lipids, glucose, and insulin metabolism in overweight hypertensive subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 1999, 70, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mozaffarian, D.; Wu, J.H.Y. Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease: Effects on Risk Factors, Molecular Pathways, and Clinical Events. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 2047–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bhatt, D.L.; Steg, P.G.; Miller, M.; Brinton, E.A.; Jacobson, T.A.; Jiao, L.; Tardif, J.C.; Gregson, J.; Pocock, S.J.; Ballantyne, C.M. Reduction in First and Total Ischemic Events with Icosapent Ethyl Across Baseline Triglyceride Tertiles. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2019, 74, 1159–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calder, P.C.; Yaqoob, P. Marine omega-3 fatty acids and coronary heart disease. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2012, 27, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Caterina, R. n–3 Fatty Acids in Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mozaffarian, D.; Rimm, E.B. Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: Evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA 2006, 296, 1885–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alfaddagh, A.; Elajami, T.K.; Ashfaque, H.; Saleh, M.; Bistrian, B.R.; Welty, F.K. Effect of Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acids Added to Statin Therapy on Coronary Artery Plaque in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nishio, R.; Shinke, T.; Otake, H.; Nakagawa, M.; Nagoshi, R.; Inoue, T.; Kozuki, A.; Hariki, H.; Osue, T.; Taniguchi, Y.; et al. Stabilizing effect of combined eicosapentaenoic acid and statin therapy on coronary thin-cap fibroatheroma. Atherosclerosis 2014, 234, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niki, T.; Wakatsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Taketani, Y.; Oeduka, H.; Kusunose, K.; Ise, T.; Iwase, T.; Yamada, H.; Soeki, T.; et al. Effects of the Addition of Eicosapentaenoic Acid to Strong Statin Therapy on Inflammatory Cytokines and Coronary Plaque Components Assessed by Integrated Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasound. Circ. J. 2016, 80, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Watanabe, T.; Ando, K.; Daidoji, H.; Otaki, Y.; Sugawara, S.; Matsui, M.; Ikeno, E.; Hirono, O.; Miyawaki, H.; Yashiro, Y.; et al. A randomized controlled trial of eicosapentaenoic acid in patients with coronary heart disease on statins. J. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Higgins, J.; Green, S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Available online: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook. (accessed on 30 July 2019).
  23. Higgins, J.P.; Altman, D.G.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Juni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savovic, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, D.; Wan, X.; Liu, J.; Tong, T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2018, 27, 1785–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wan, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Tong, T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mita, T.; Watada, H.; Ogihara, T.; Nomiyama, T.; Ogawa, O.; Kinoshita, J.; Shimizu, T.; Hirose, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Kawamori, R. Eicosapentaenoic acid reduces the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 2007, 191, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bhatia, L.; Scorletti, E.; Curzen, N.; Clough, G.F.; Calder, P.C.; Byrne, C.D. Improvement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity is associated with a reduction in carotid intima-media thickness progression. Atherosclerosis 2016, 246, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Massaro, M.; Scoditti, E.; Carluccio, M.A.; Campana, M.C.; De Caterina, R. Omega-3 fatty acids, inflammation and angiogenesis: Basic mechanisms behind the cardioprotective effects of fish and fish oils. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2010, 56, 59–82. [Google Scholar]
  29. Calder, P.C. Mechanisms of Action of (n-3) Fatty Acids. J. Nutr. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zampolli, A.; Bysted, A.; Leth, T.; Mortensen, A.; De Caterina, R.; Falk, E. Contrasting effect of fish oil supplementation on the development of atherosclerosis in murine models. Atherosclerosis 2006, 184, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Casos, K.; Saiz, M.P.; Ruiz-Sanz, J.I.; Mitjavila, M.T. Atherosclerosis prevention by a fish oil-rich diet in apoE (−/−) mice is associated with a reduction of endothelial adhesion molecules. Atherosclerosis 2008, 201, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakajima, K.; Yamashita, T.; Kita, T.; Takeda, M.; Sasaki, N.; Kasahara, K.; Shinohara, M.; Rikitake, Y.; Ishida, T.; Yokoyama, M.; et al. Orally administered eicosapentaenoic acid induces rapid regression of atherosclerosis via modulating the phenotype of dendritic cells in LDL receptor-deficient mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 1963–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matsumoto, M.; Sata, M.; Fukuda, D.; Tanaka, K.; Soma, M.; Hirata, Y.; Nagai, R. Orally administered eicosapentaenoic acid reduces and stabilizes atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 2008, 197, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.; Wu, D.; Matthan, N.R.; Lamon-Fava, S.; Lecker, J.L.; Lichtenstein, A.H. Reduction in dietary omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids: Eicosapentaenoic acid plus docosahexaenoic acid ratio minimizes atherosclerotic lesion formation and inflammatory response in the LDL receptor null mouse. Atherosclerosis 2009, 204, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weiner, B.H.; Ockene, I.S.; Levine, P.H.; Cuenoud, H.F.; Fisher, M.; Johnson, B.F.; Daoud, A.S.; Jarmolych, J.; Hosmer, D.; Johnson, M.H.; et al. Inhibition of atherosclerosis by cod-liver oil in a hyperlipidemic swine model. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986, 315, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Davis, H.R.; Bridenstine, R.T.; Vesselinovitch, D.; Wissler, R.W. Fish oil inhibits development of atherosclerosis in rhesus monkeys. Arteriosclerosis 1987, 7, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, J.; Folsom, A.R.; Lewis, L.; Eckfeldt, J.H. Relation of plasma phospholipid and cholesterol ester fatty acid composition to carotid artery intima-media thickness: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 65, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, K.; Liu, K.; Daviglus, M.L.; Mayer-Davis, E.; Jenny, N.S.; Jiang, R.; Ouyang, P.; Steffen, L.M.; Siscovick, D.; Wu, C.; et al. Intakes of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and fish in relation to measurements of subclinical atherosclerosis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heine-Broring, R.C.; Brouwer, I.A.; Proenca, R.V.; van Rooij, F.J.; Hofman, A.; Oudkerk, M.; Witteman, J.C.; Geleijnse, J.M. Intake of fish and marine n-3 fatty acids in relation to coronary calcification: The Rotterdam Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Greenland, P.; Bonow, R.O.; Brundage, B.H.; Budoff, M.J.; Eisenberg, M.J.; Grundy, S.M.; Lauer, M.S.; Post, W.S.; Raggi, P.; Redberg, R.F.; et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). Circulation 2007, 115, 402–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hino, A.; Adachi, H.; Toyomasu, K.; Yoshida, N.; Enomoto, M.; Hiratsuka, A.; Hirai, Y.; Satoh, A.; Imaizumi, T. Very long chain N-3 fatty acids intake and carotid atherosclerosis: An epidemiological study evaluated by ultrasonography. Atherosclerosis 2004, 176, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sekikawa, A.; Mahajan, H.; Kadowaki, S.; Hisamatsu, T.; Miyagawa, N.; Fujiyoshi, A.; Kadota, A.; Maegawa, H.; Murata, K.; Miura, K.; et al. Association of blood levels of marine omega-3 fatty acids with coronary calcification and calcium density in Japanese men. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sekikawa, A.; Curb, J.D.; Ueshima, H.; El-Saed, A.; Kadowaki, T.; Abbott, R.D.; Evans, R.W.; Rodriguez, B.L.; Okamura, T.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K.; et al. Marine-derived n-3 fatty acids and atherosclerosis in Japanese, Japanese-American, and white men: A cross-sectional study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Innes, J.K.; Calder, P.C. The Differential Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahn, J.; Park, S.K.; Park, T.S.; Kim, J.H.; Yun, E.; Kim, S.P.; Lee, H.W.; Oh, J.H.; Choi, J.H.; Cha, K.S.; et al. Effect of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Statin Treated Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Korean Circ. J. 2016, 46, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Angerer, P.; Kothny, W.; Stork, S.; von Schacky, C. Effect of dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids on progression of atherosclerosis in carotid arteries. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002, 54, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baldassarre, D.; Amato, M.; Eligini, S.; Barbieri, S.S.; Mussoni, L.; Frigerio, B.; Kozakova, M.; Tremoli, E.; Sirtori, C.R.; Colli, S. Effect of n-3 fatty acids on carotid atherosclerosis and haemostasis in patients with combined hyperlipoproteinemia: A double-blind pilot study in primary prevention. Ann. Med. 2006, 38, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lonn, E.M.; Bosch, J.; Diaz, R.; Lopez-Jaramillo, P.; Ramachandran, A.; Hancu, N.; Hanefeld, M.; Krum, H.; Ryden, L.; Smith, S.; et al. Effect of insulin glargine and n-3FA on carotid intima-media thickness in people with dysglycemia at high risk for cardiovascular events: The glucose reduction and atherosclerosis continuing evaluation study (ORIGIN-GRACE). Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 2466–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Von Schacky, C.; Angerer, P.; Kothny, W.; Theisen, K.; Mudra, H. The effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acids on coronary atherosclerosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bird, J.K.; Calder, P.C.; Eggersdorfer, M. The Role of n-3 Long Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, and Interactions with Statins. Nutrients 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chang, C.H.; Tseng, P.T.; Chen, N.Y.; Lin, P.C.; Lin, P.Y.; Chang, J.P.; Kuo, F.Y.; Lin, J.; Wu, M.C.; Su, K.P. Safety and tolerability of prescription omega-3 fatty acids: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 2018, 129, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wei, M.Y.; Jacobson, T.A. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid on serum lipids: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2011, 13, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Skulas-Ray, A.C.; Wilson, P.W.F.; Harris, W.S.; Brinton, E.A.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Richter, C.K.; Jacobson, T.A.; Engler, M.B.; Miller, M.; Robinson, J.G.; et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids for the Management of Hypertriglyceridemia: A Science Advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nicholls, S.J.; Lincoff, A.M.; Bash, D.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Barter, P.J.; Davidson, M.H.; Kastelein, J.J.P.; Koenig, W.; McGuire, D.K.; Mozaffarian, D.; et al. Assessment of omega-3 carboxylic acids in statin-treated patients with high levels of triglycerides and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Rationale and design of the STRENGTH trial. Clin. Cardiol. 2018, 41, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mori, T.A.; Burke, V.; Puddey, I.B.; Watts, G.F.; O’Neal, D.N.; Best, J.D.; Beilin, L.J. Purified eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids have differential effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins, LDL particle size, glucose, and insulin in mildly hyperlipidemic men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Grimsgaard, S.; Bonaa, K.H.; Hansen, J.B.; Nordoy, A. Highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in humans have similar triacylglycerol-lowering effects but divergent effects on serum fatty acids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 66, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Allaire, J.; Couture, P.; Leclerc, M.; Charest, A.; Marin, J.; Lepine, M.C.; Talbot, D.; Tchernof, A.; Lamarche, B. A randomized, crossover, head-to-head comparison of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation to reduce inflammation markers in men and women: The Comparing EPA to DHA (ComparED) Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Egert, S.; Kannenberg, F.; Somoza, V.; Erbersdobler, H.F.; Wahrburg, U. Dietary alpha-linolenic acid, EPA, and DHA have differential effects on LDL fatty acid composition but similar effects on serum lipid profiles in normolipidemic humans. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tabas, I.; Glass, C.K. Anti-inflammatory therapy in chronic disease: Challenges and opportunities. Science 2013, 339, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lahoute, C.; Herbin, O.; Mallat, Z.; Tedgui, A. Adaptive immunity in atherosclerosis: Mechanisms and future therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. 2011, 8, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Calder, P.C.; Albers, R.; Antoine, J.M.; Blum, S.; Bourdet-Sicard, R.; Ferns, G.A.; Folkerts, G.; Friedmann, P.S.; Frost, G.S.; Guarner, F.; et al. Inflammatory disease processes and interactions with nutrition. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ridker, P.M. From C-Reactive Protein to Interleukin-6 to Interleukin-1: Moving Upstream to Identify Novel Targets for Atheroprotection. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Custodero, C.; Mankowski, R.T.; Lee, S.A.; Chen, Z.; Wu, S.; Manini, T.M.; Hincapie Echeverri, J.; Sabba, C.; Beavers, D.P.; Cauley, J.A.; et al. Evidence-based nutritional and pharmacological interventions targeting chronic low-grade inflammation in middle-age and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018, 46, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chaurasia, B.; Summers, S.A. Ceramides—Lipotoxic Inducers of Metabolic Disorders. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2015, 26, 538–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Summers, S.A. Could Ceramides Become the New Cholesterol? Cell. Metab. 2018, 27, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Devlin, C.M.; Leventhal, A.R.; Kuriakose, G.; Schuchman, E.H.; Williams, K.J.; Tabas, I. Acid sphingomyelinase promotes lipoprotein retention within early atheromata and accelerates lesion progression. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1723–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tarasov, K.; Ekroos, K.; Suoniemi, M.; Kauhanen, D.; Sylvanne, T.; Hurme, R.; Gouni-Berthold, I.; Berthold, H.K.; Kleber, M.E.; Laaksonen, R.; et al. Molecular lipids identify cardiovascular risk and are efficiently lowered by simvastatin and PCSK9 deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, E45–E52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, D.D.; Toledo, E.; Hruby, A.; Rosner, B.A.; Willett, W.C.; Sun, Q.; Razquin, C.; Zheng, Y.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Guasch-Ferre, M.; et al. Plasma Ceramides, Mediterranean Diet, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the PREDIMED Trial (Prevencion con Dieta Mediterranea). Circulation 2017, 135, 2028–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hilvo, M.; Meikle, P.J.; Pedersen, E.R.; Tell, G.S.; Dhar, I.; Brenner, H.; Schottker, B.; Laaperi, M.; Kauhanen, D.; Koistinen, K.M.; et al. Development and validation of a ceramide- and phospholipid-based cardiovascular risk estimation score for coronary artery disease patients. Eur. Heart J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Meeusen, J.W.; Donato, L.J.; Bryant, S.C.; Baudhuin, L.M.; Berger, P.B.; Jaffe, A.S. Plasma Ceramides. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 1933–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Peterson, L.R.; Xanthakis, V.; Duncan, M.S.; Gross, S.; Friedrich, N.; Volzke, H.; Felix, S.B.; Jiang, H.; Sidhu, R.; Nauck, M.; et al. Ceramide Remodeling and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Midtbo, L.K.; Borkowska, A.G.; Bernhard, A.; Ronnevik, A.K.; Lock, E.J.; Fitzgerald, M.L.; Torstensen, B.E.; Liaset, B.; Brattelid, T.; Pedersen, T.L.; et al. Intake of farmed Atlantic salmon fed soybean oil increases hepatic levels of arachidonic acid-derived oxylipins and ceramides in mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2015, 26, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Taltavull, N.; Ras, R.; Marine, S.; Romeu, M.; Giralt, M.; Mendez, L.; Medina, I.; Ramos-Romero, S.; Torres, J.L.; Nogues, M.R. Protective effects of fish oil on pre-diabetes: A lipidomic analysis of liver ceramides in rats. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3981–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Skorve, J.; Hilvo, M.; Vihervaara, T.; Burri, L.; Bohov, P.; Tillander, V.; Bjorndal, B.; Suoniemi, M.; Laaksonen, R.; Ekroos, K.; et al. Fish oil and krill oil differentially modify the liver and brain lipidome when fed to mice. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Andersson, J.; Libby, P.; Hansson, G.K. Adaptive immunity and atherosclerosis. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 134, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tracy, R.P.; Doyle, M.F.; Olson, N.C.; Huber, S.A.; Jenny, N.S.; Sallam, R.; Psaty, B.M.; Kronmal, R.A. T-helper type 1 bias in healthy people is associated with cytomegalovirus serology and atherosclerosis: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, P.; Kim, W.; Zhou, L.; Wang, N.; Ly, L.H.; McMurray, D.N.; Chapkin, R.S. Dietary fish oil inhibits antigen-specific murine Th1 cell development by suppression of clonal expansion. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 2391–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Serhan, C.; Arita, M.; Hong, S.; Gotlinger, K. Resolvins, docosatrienes, and neuroprotectins, novel omega-3-derived mediators, and their endogenous aspirin-triggered epimers. Lipids 2004, 39, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Back, M.; Yurdagul, A., Jr.; Tabas, I.; Oorni, K.; Kovanen, P.T. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: Mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. 2019, 16, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Serhan, C.N. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature 2014, 510, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chiang, N.; Serhan, C.N. Structural elucidation and physiologic functions of specialized pro-resolving mediators and their receptors. Mol. Aspects Med. 2017, 58, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Itakura, H.; Yokoyama, M.; Matsuzaki, M.; Saito, Y.; Origasa, H.; Ishikawa, Y.; Oikawa, S.; Sasaki, J.; Hishida, H.; Kita, T.; et al. Relationships between plasma fatty acid composition and coronary artery disease. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2011, 18, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ballantyne, C.M.; Manku, M.S.; Bays, H.E.; Philip, S.; Granowitz, C.; Doyle, R.T., Jr.; Juliano, R.A. Icosapent Ethyl Effects on Fatty Acid Profiles in Statin-Treated Patients with High Triglycerides: The Randomized, Placebo-controlled ANCHOR Study. Cardiol. Ther. 2019, 8, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nicholls, S.J.; Hsu, A.; Wolski, K.; Hu, B.; Bayturan, O.; Lavoie, A.; Uno, K.; Tuzcu, E.M.; Nissen, S.E. Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2399–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. D’Ascenzo, F.; Agostoni, P.; Abbate, A.; Castagno, D.; Lipinski, M.J.; Vetrovec, G.W.; Frati, G.; Presutti, D.G.; Quadri, G.; Moretti, C.; et al. Atherosclerotic coronary plaque regression and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: A meta-regression of randomized clinical trials. Atherosclerosis 2013, 226, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Crouse, J.R., 3rd; Raichlen, J.S.; Riley, W.A.; Evans, G.W.; Palmer, M.K.; O’Leary, D.H.; Grobbee, D.E.; Bots, M.L. Effect of rosuvastatin on progression of carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis: The METEOR Trial. JAMA 2007, 297, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Taylor, A.J.; Villines, T.C.; Stanek, E.J.; Devine, P.J.; Griffen, L.; Miller, M.; Weissman, N.J.; Turco, M. Extended-Release Niacin or Ezetimibe and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 2113–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Costanzo, P.; Perrone-Filardi, P.; Vassallo, E.; Paolillo, S.; Cesarano, P.; Brevetti, G.; Chiariello, M. Does Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Regression Predict Reduction of Cardiovascular Events? A Meta-Analysis of 41 Randomized Trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 56, 2006–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Goldberger, Z.D.; Valle, J.A.; Dandekar, V.K.; Chan, P.S.; Ko, D.T.; Nallamothu, B.K. Are changes in carotid intima-media thickness related to risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction? A critical review and meta-regression analysis. Am. Heart J. 2010, 160, 701–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of meta-analysis.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of meta-analysis.
Nutrients 11 02599 g001
Figure 2. Effect of high-dose marine omega-3 fatty acids on atherosclerosis.
Figure 2. Effect of high-dose marine omega-3 fatty acids on atherosclerosis.
Nutrients 11 02599 g002
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis after excluding the most and second most influential studies.
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis after excluding the most and second most influential studies.
Nutrients 11 02599 g003
Figure 4. Subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis.
Figure 4. Subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis.
Nutrients 11 02599 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of the included trials.
Table 1. Characteristics of the included trials.
Author, Year, Location, ReferenceNumber of Participants Treatment/ControlAge (years) Treatment/ControlCharacteristics of the ParticipantsUse of StatinUse of PlaceboDose and Type of OM3 (g/day)Purity of OM3 (%)Duration of Intervention (months)
Alfaddagh, 2017, US [17]143/14263 ± 8 vs. 64 ± 8CHD or CV risk factorYesNo1.86 EPA + 1.50 DHA90%30
Bhatia, 2016, UK [27]51/5249 ± 11 vs. 54 ± 9NAFLDNoYes1.368 EPA + 1.656 DHA90%15 to 18
Mita, 2006, Japan [26]40/4159 ± 11 vs. 61 ± 8T2DMNoNo1.8 EPA>98%25 ± 2
Niki, 2016, Japan [19]48/4768 ± 10 vs. 69 ± 11CHD and DLYesNo1.8 EPA>98%6
Nishio, 2014, Japan [18]25/2761 ± 13 vs. 64 ± 10CHD and DLYesNo1.8 EPA>98%9
Watanabe, 2017, Japan [20]122/11967 ± 10 vs. 68 ± 10CHDYesNo1.8 EPA>98%6 to 8
OM3: marine omega-3 fatty acids, CHD: coronary heart disease, CV: cardiovascular, NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, T2DM: type 2 diabetes, DL: dyslipidemia, EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid, DHA: docosahexaenoic acid.
Table 2. Primary outcome of atherosclerosis and the result of each included trial.
Table 2. Primary outcome of atherosclerosis and the result of each included trial.
First Author, Year, Country, ReferenceImaging Techniques Primary OutcomeBaseline Measurement Treatment vs. Control GroupsDifference in Primary Outcome between the End of Intervention and Baseline in Each of Treatment and Control Groups Treatment vs. Control GroupsNet Difference between Intervention and Control Groupsp-Value for Net Difference
Alfaddagh, 2017, US [17]cCTAPercent change in non-calcified plaque volume (%)26.4 (14.3, 39.7) vs. 23.7 (14.3, 36.8)1.71 ± 19.9 vs. 4.75 ± 16.44−3.040.14
Bhatia, 2016, UK [27]B-Mode ultrasoundChange in mean carotid IMT (mm)0.649 ± 0.095 vs. 0.674 ± 0.0980.0124 ± 0.0115 vs. 0.0157 ± 0.0138−0.0030.17
Mita, 2006, Japan [26]B-mode ultrasoundAnnual change in maximum carotid IMT (mm/year)1.505 ± 0.412 vs. 1.706 ± 0.423−0.084 ± 0.113 vs. −0.005 ± 0.108−0.079<0.01
Niki, 2016, Japan [19]IVUSChange in lipid plaque volume (mm3)18.5 ± 1.3 vs. 17.8 ± 1.3−3.5 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0−5.0<0.01
Nishio, 2014, Japan [18]OCTChange in fibrous-cap thickness (um)47.5 ± 7.4 vs. 46.5 ± 10.9−54.8 ± 27.9 vs. −23.5 ± 11.6−31.3<0.01
Watanabe, 2017, Japan [20]IVUSChange in normalized total atheroma volume (mm3) 74.2 (55.9, 99.2) vs. 74.2 (57.5, 96.8)−8.49 ± 2.37 vs. −2.90 ± 4.74−5.59<0.01
cCTA: coronary computed tomographic angiography, IVUS: integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound; OCT: optical coherence tomography, IMT: intima-media thickness; SD: standard deviation; Baseline measurement is expressed as mean (SD) or median (inter-quartile range).
Table 3. Risk of bias for each trial.
Table 3. Risk of bias for each trial.
StudySelection BiasPerformance biasDetection BiasAttrition BiasReporting BiasOther BiasTotal
Random Sequence GenerationAllocation ConcealmentBlinding of Participants and PersonnelBlinding of Outcome AssessmentIncomplete Outcome DataSelective Outcome ReportingOther Source of BiasLow on Risk of Bias
Alfaddagh, 2017, US [17]lowhighhighlowlowlowlow5/7
Bhatia, 2016, UK [27]lowunclearlowlowlowlowlow6/7
Mita, 2006, Japan [26]unclearunclearhighlowlowunclearlow3/7
Niki, 2016, Japan [19] lowlowhighlowlowlowlow6/7
Nishio, 2014, Japan [18]unclearunclearhighlowlow unclearlow3/7
Watanabe, 2017, Japan [20]low highhighunclearlowlowlow4/7

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop