Next Article in Journal
Vitamin C to Improve Organ Dysfunction in Cardiac Surgery Patients—Review and Pragmatic Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Narrative Review of New Methods for Assessing Food and Energy Intake
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Sectional Associations between Dietary Fat-Related Behaviors and Continuous Metabolic Syndrome Score among Young Australian Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accuracy of Automatic Carbohydrate, Protein, Fat and Calorie Counting Based on Voice Descriptions of Meals in People with Type 1 Diabetes
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Nutrient Estimates Based on Food Volume versus Weight: Implications for Dietary Assessment Methods

1
Nutritional Sciences Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
2
Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(8), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10080973
Received: 14 May 2018 / Revised: 12 July 2018 / Accepted: 17 July 2018 / Published: 27 July 2018
Novel technology-based dietary assessment methods use volume estimates of foods to assess dietary intake. However, the nutrient content of standard databases is based on food weight. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the United States Department of Agriculture National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (USDA-SR) estimates of volume and the corresponding macronutrient content of the foods. The weights of 35 individual food volumes were measured (on trial) and compared to the USDA-SR-determined weight for the food volume. Macronutrient content corresponding to the trial weight and the USDA-SR weight for the food volume (USDA) were determined using the USDA-SR, and the differences were calculated. There were statistically significant differences between the USDA and trial weights for 80% of foods measured. Calorie estimates by USDA weight were significantly lower than that of trial weight for 54% of foods but were significantly greater for 26% of foods. Differences in macronutrient estimates by trial and USDA weight varied by food type. These findings suggest that nutrient databases based on food weight may not provide accurate estimates of dietary intake when assessed using food volumes. Further development of image-assisted dietary assessment methods which measure food volumes will necessitate evaluation of the accuracy of the processes used to convert weight to volume in nutrient databases. View Full-Text
Keywords: nutrition; food measurement; nutrient database; dietary assessment nutrition; food measurement; nutrient database; dietary assessment
MDPI and ACS Style

Partridge, E.K.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Breymeyer, K.; Schenk, J.M. Comparison of Nutrient Estimates Based on Food Volume versus Weight: Implications for Dietary Assessment Methods. Nutrients 2018, 10, 973.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop