Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Alignment between the Health Claims Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC) and the Health Star Rating (HSR) Nutrient Profiling Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparing Interviewer-Administered and Web-Based Food Frequency Questionnaires to Predict Energy Requirements in Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Metabolomics: Postprandial Response of Meals Relating to Vegan, Lacto-Ovo Vegetarian, and Omnivore Diets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Nutrient Estimates Based on Food Volume versus Weight: Implications for Dietary Assessment Methods
Open AccessReview

Narrative Review of New Methods for Assessing Food and Energy Intake

1
Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 6-002 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Innovation Research, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
2
Department of Physiology, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 6-002 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Innovation Research, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(8), 1064; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10081064
Received: 15 June 2018 / Revised: 30 July 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 10 August 2018
Dietary self-report instruments are essential to nutritional analysis in dietetics practice and their use in research settings has facilitated numerous important discoveries related to nutrition, health and chronic diseases. An important example is obesity, for which measuring changes in energy intake is critical for assessing efficacy of dietary interventions. However, current methods, including counting calories, estimating portion size and using food labels to estimate human energy intake have considerable constraints; consequently, research on new methodologies/technologies has been encouraged to mitigate the present weaknesses. The use of technologies has prompted innovation in dietary analysis. In this review, the strengths and limitations of new approaches have been analyzed based on ease of use, practical limitations, and statistical evaluation of reliability and validity. Their utility is discussed through the lens of the 4Ms of Obesity Assessment and Management, which has been used to evaluate root causes of obesity and help select treatment options. View Full-Text
Keywords: dietary assessment; energy intake; validity; reliability dietary assessment; energy intake; validity; reliability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Archundia Herrera, M.C.; Chan, C.B. Narrative Review of New Methods for Assessing Food and Energy Intake. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1064.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop