Next Article in Journal
Snacking Patterns in Children: A Comparison between Australia, China, Mexico, and the US
Next Article in Special Issue
Out-of-Home Food Consumers in Brazil: What do They Eat?
Previous Article in Journal
Cholecalciferol Additively Reduces Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels in Severe Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treated with Calcitriol and Cinacalcet among Hemodialysis Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Empirically Derived Dietary Patterns in UK Adults Are Associated with Sociodemographic Characteristics, Lifestyle, and Diet Quality
Open AccessArticle

Compliance with Dietary Guidelines Varies by Weight Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of Australian Adults

CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, P.O. Box 10041, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(2), 197;
Received: 29 November 2017 / Revised: 25 January 2018 / Accepted: 3 February 2018 / Published: 11 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Patterns, Diet Quality and Human Health)
Population surveys have rarely identified dietary patterns associated with excess energy intake in relation to risk of obesity. This study uses self-reported food intake data from the validated Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Healthy Diet Score survey to examine whether apparent compliance with dietary guidelines varies by weight status. The sample of 185,951 Australian adults were majority female (71.8%), with 30.2%, 35.3% and 31.0% aged between 18–30, 31–50 and 51–70 years respectively. Using multinomial regression, in the adjusted model controlling for gender and age, individuals in the lowest quintile of diet quality were almost three times more likely to be obese than those in the highest quintile (OR 2.99, CI: 2.88:3.11; p < 0.001). The differential components of diet quality between normal and obese adults were fruit (difference in compliance score 12.9 points out of a possible 100, CI: 12.3:13.5; p < 0.001), discretionary foods (8.7 points, CI: 8.1:9.2; p < 0.001), and healthy fats (7.7 points, CI: 7.2:8.1; p < 0.001). Discretionary foods was the lowest scoring component across all gender and weight status groups, and are an important intervention target to improve diet quality. This study contributes to the evidence that diet quality is associated with health outcomes, including weight status, and will be useful in framing recommendations for obesity prevention and management. View Full-Text
Keywords: diet quality; dietary guidelines; obesity; discretionary choices diet quality; dietary guidelines; obesity; discretionary choices
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hendrie, G.A.; Golley, R.K.; Noakes, M. Compliance with Dietary Guidelines Varies by Weight Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of Australian Adults. Nutrients 2018, 10, 197.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop