An Integrated Monitoring Concept for Dam Infrastructure: Operational PSI Service and Application of Electronic Corner Reflectors (ECR)
Highlights
- The long-term analysis of Sentinel-1 backscatter demonstrates stable signal behavior of all installed electronic corner reflectors (ECRs) over more than 2.5 years (typical Amplitude Dispersion Index ≤ 0.4), confirming their suitability as highly coherent radar targets for Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI).
- PSI analyses based on the ECR installations yielded millimeter-level deformation estimates that agree with in situ plumb and trigonometric measurements, with typical Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 2 to 5 mm and correlations up to r = 0.7, confirming the reliability of ECR-based PSI under real-world operational conditions.
- ECRs enable PSI analyses at dams where conventional passive reflectors cannot be installed, providing comparable signal stability but requiring higher operational maintenance.
- The developed operational PSI service integrates ECR-based PSI results and ground-motion products into an accessible web platform, supporting dam operators with interactive time-series visualization, standardized downloads, and practical decision-making tools for infrastructure surveillance.
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Motivation
1.2. State of the Art
1.3. The Application Progress of ECRs in Dam Monitoring
2. Study Area and Data
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data
2.2.1. Satellite Data
2.2.2. In Situ Measurements
3. Methods
3.1. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
3.2. Web-Based Service
4. Results
4.1. Backscatter Analysis
4.2. Comparative PSI Analysis and Validation
4.3. Web-Based Application and Data Accessibility
5. Discussion
5.1. Assessment of Amplitude Stability
5.2. Assessment of Deformation Quality
5.3. Advantages of the (On-Demand) Web Service
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ADI | Amplitude Dispersion Index |
| APS | Atmospheric Phase Screen |
| BBD | BodenbewegungsDienst Deutschland—German Ground Motion Service |
| DEM | Digital Elevation Model |
| DIN | Deutsches Institut für Normung—German Institute for Standardization |
| DInSAR | Differential Interferometric SAR |
| ECR | Electronic Corner Reflector |
| EGMS | European Ground Motion Service |
| ESA | European Space Agency |
| ESD | Enhanced Spectral Diversity |
| GDI | Geodata Infrastructure |
| GMS | Ground Motion Service |
| GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System |
| IW | Interferometric Wide Swath |
| LOS | Line-of-Sight |
| LUI | Land-Use Index |
| MAE | Mean Absolute Error |
| MedAE | Median Absolute Error |
| MT-InSAR | Multi-Temporal Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar |
| PS | Persistent Scatterer Pixel |
| PSI | Persistent Scatterer Interferometry |
| RCS | Radar Cross Section |
| RMSE | Root Mean Square Error |
| SAR | Synthetic Aperture Radar |
| SBAS | Small Baseline Subset |
| SLC | Single-Look-Complex |
| SNAP | Sentinel Application Platform |
| StaMPS | Stanford Method for Persistent Scatterers |
| TOPS | Terrain Observation with Progressive Scans |
Appendix A

References
- Jänichen, J.; Schmullius, C.; Baade, J.; Last, K.; Bettzieche, V.; Dubois, C. Monitoring of Radial Deformations of a Gravity Dam Using Sentinel-1 Persistent Scatterer Interferometry. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bettzieche, V. Satellitenüberwachung der Verformungen von Staumauern und Staudämmen. WasserWirtschaft 2020, 110, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferretti, A.; Prati, C.; Rocca, F. Analysis of Permanent Scatterers in SAR Interferometry. In IGARSS 2000—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Proceedings, Honolulu, HI, USA, 24–28 July 2000; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2000; Volume 2, pp. 761–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferretti, A.; Prati, C.; Rocca, F. Permanent Scatterers in SAR Interferometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalia, A.C.; Frei, M.; Lege, T. BodenBewegungsdienst Deutschland (BBD): Konzept, Umsetzung und Service-Plattform. zfv—Zeitschrift für Geodäsie Geoinformation und Landmanagement 2021, 146, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR). BodenBewegungsdienst Deutschland (BBD) Web App. Available online: https://bodenbewegungsdienst.bgr.de/mapapps/resources/apps/bbd/index.html?lang=de (accessed on 15 August 2025).
- Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. European Ground Motion Service (EGMS)—Product Overview. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/european-ground-motion-service (accessed on 15 August 2025).
- Even, M.; Westerhaus, M.; Kutterer, H. German and European Ground Motion Service: A Comparison. PFG—J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 2024, 92, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hrysiewicz, A.; Khoshlahjeh Azar, M.; Holohan, E.P. EGMS-toolkit: A Set of Python Scripts for Improved Access to Datasets from the European Ground Motion Service. Earth Sci. Inform. 2024, 17, 3825–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jänichen, J.; Ziemer, J.; Wicker, C.; Last, K.; Schmullius, C.; Kalia, A.C.; Lege, T.; Dubois, C. Evaluating the German Ground Motion Service for Operational Dam Monitoring: A Comparison of InSAR Data with In Situ Measurements. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milillo, P.; Porcu, M.C.; Lundgren, P.; Soccodato, F.; Salzer, J.; Fielding, E.; Bürgmann, R.; Milillo, G.; Perissin, D.; Biondi, F. The ongoing destabilization of the Mosul Dam as observed by synthetic aperture radar interferometry. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2017—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 23–28 July 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 6279–6282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Armenteros, A.M.; Lazecky, M.; Hlaváčová, I.; Bakoň, M.; Delgado, J.M.; Sousa, J.J.; Lamas-Fernández, F.; Marchamalo, M.; Caro-Cuenca, M.; Papco, J.; et al. Deformation monitoring of dam infrastructures via spaceborne MT-InSAR. The case of La Viñuela (Málaga, southern Spain). Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 138, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abo, H.; Osawa, T.; Ge, P.; Takahashi, A.; Yamagishi, K. Deformation Monitoring of Large-Scale Rockfill Dam Applying Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) Using Sentinel-1 SAR Data. In Proceedings of APSAR 2021—7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Bali, Indonesia, 1–3 November 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corsetti, M.; Fossati, F.; Manunta, M.; Marsella, M. Advanced SBAS-DInSAR technique for controlling large civil infrastructures: An application to the Genzano di Lucania dam. Sensors 2018, 18, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othman, A.A.; Al-Maamar, A.F.; Al-Manmi, D.A.M.; Liesenberg, V.; Hasan, S.E.; Al-Saady, Y.I.; Shihab, A.T.; Khwedim, K. Application of DInSAR-PSI technology for deformation monitoring of the Mosul Dam, Iraq. Remote Sensing 2019, 11, 2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayik, C.; Abdikan, S.; Arıkan, M. Long term displacement observation of the Atatürk Dam, Turkey by multi-temporal InSAR analysis. Acta Astronaut. 2021, 189, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchamalo-Sacristán, M.; Ruiz-Armenteros, A.M.; Lamas-Fernández, F.; González-Rodrigo, B.; Martínez-Marín, R.; Delgado-Blasco, J.M.; Bakon, M.; Lazecky, M.; Perissin, D.; Papco, J.; et al. MT-InSAR and dam modeling for the comprehensive monitoring of an Earth-fill dam: The case of the Benínar dam (Almería, Spain). Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchamalo-Sacristán, M.; Fernández-Landa, A.; Sancho, C.; Hernández-Cabezudo, A.; Krishnakumar, V.; García-Lanchares, C.; Sánchez, J.; Rubén, M.M.; Rejas-Ayuga, J.; González-Tejada, I.; et al. EyeRADAR-Dam: Integration of MT-InSAR with monitoring technologies in a pilot monitoring system for embankment dams. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, 239, 2286–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Perissin, D. Cosmo-SkyMed AO projects—3D reconstruction and stability monitoring of the Three Gorges Dam. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2012—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, Germany, 22–27 July 2012; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 3831–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazecky, M.; Perissin, D.; Lei, L.; Qin, Y.; Scaioni, M. Plover Cove Dam Monitoring with Spaceborne InSAR Technique in Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint International Symposium on Deformation Monitoring (JISDM), Nottingham, UK, 9–10 September 2013; pp. 9–11. Available online: http://www.sarproz.com/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/lazecky-pcdmwsitihk2013.pdf (accessed on 21 August 2025).
- Tomás, R.; Cano, M.; Garcia-Barba, J.; Vicente, F.; Herrera, G.; Lopez-Sanchez, J.M.; Mallorquí, J. Monitoring an earthfill dam using differential SAR interferometry: La Pedrera dam, Alicante, Spain. Eng. Geol. 2013, 157, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubois, C.; Ziemer, J.; Jänichen, J.; Stumpf, N.; Liedel, C.; Sabrowski, M.; Schmullius, C. Dam Monitoring With Ground Motion Services—A Case Study of a Gravity Dam with the German Ground Motion Service. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2024—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Athens, Greece, 7–12 July 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 4670–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, G.; Ziemer, J.; Wicker, C.; Jänichen, J.; Demisch, G.; Klöpper, D.; Last, K.; Denzler, J.; Schmullius, C.; Shadaydeh, M.; et al. Data-Driven Prediction of Large Infrastructure Movements Through Persistent Scatterer Time Series Modeling. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2024—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Athens, Greece, 7–12 July 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 8669–8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garthwaite, M.C. On the Design of Radar Corner Reflectors for Deformation Monitoring in Multi-Frequency InSAR. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Y.; Perissin, D.; Lei, L. The Design and Experiments on Corner Reflectors for Urban Ground Deformation Monitoring in Hong Kong. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2013, 2013, 191685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinković, P.; Ketelaar, V.B.H.; van Leijen, F.J.; Hanssen, R.F. InSAR Quality Control: Analysis of Five Years of Corner Reflector Time Series. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on ERS/Envisat SAR Interferometry (FRINGE07), Frascati, Italy, 26–30 November 2007; Lacoste, H., Ouwehand, L., Eds.; ESA SP-649; ESA Communications: Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Kotulak, N.; Mleczko, M.; Crosetto, M.; Palamà, R.; Mróz, M. Interferometric SAR Deformation Monitoring Using Passive Reflectors and Ascending and Descending Passes. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2022, XLIII-B3-2022, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jauvin, M.; Yan, Y.; Trouvé, E.; Fruneau, B.; Gay, M.; Girard, B. Integration of Corner Reflectors for the Monitoring of Mountain Glacier Areas with Sentinel-1 Time Series. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czikhardt, R.; van der Marel, H.; Papco, J. GECORIS: An Open-Source Toolbox for Analyzing Time Series of Corner Reflectors in InSAR Geodesy. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dheenathayalan, P.; Caro Cuenca, M.; Hoogeboom, P.; Hanssen, R.F. Small Reflectors for Ground Motion Monitoring with InSAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2017, 55, 6703–6712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strozzi, T.; Teatini, P.; Tosi, L.; Wegmüller, U.; Werner, C. Land Subsidence of Natural Transitional Environments by Satellite Radar Interferometry on Artificial Reflectors. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2013, 118, 1177–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Y.; Perissin, D. Monitoring Ground Subsidence in Hong Kong via Spaceborne Radar: Experiments and Validation. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 10715–10736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasni, K.; Gourine, B.; Larabi, M.E.A. Dam Deformation Monitoring using Cloud-Based P-SBAS Algorithm: The Kramis Dam Case (Algeria). Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2023, 13, 10759–10764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gourine, B.; Hasni, K. First Algerian Experiment of Manufactured Corner Reflectors for an Embankment Dam Monitoring: Case of Kramis Dam (Mostaganem, Algeria). In Proceedings of the World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium (WMES 2019), Prague, Czech Republic, 9–13 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gourine, B.; Hasni, K.; Allal, S.H. Deformation Monitoring of Kramis’s Dam Region (State of Mostaganem, Algeria) by Radar Interferometry Using SBAS Technique: First Results. In Proceedings of the FRINGE 2021—11th International Workshop on Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 31 May–4 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Mahapatra, P.S.; Samiei-Esfahany, S.; Hanssen, R.F. Performance Evaluation of Advanced Corner Reflector Designs for InSAR Applications. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balss, U.; Eineder, M.; Suchandt, S.; Gisinger, C. Compact Polyhedral Corner Reflectors for Sentinel-1 InSAR Applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 2022, 268, 112776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Marel, H.; van Leijen, F.J.; Hanssen, R.F. First Analysis of C-Band ECR Transponders for InSAR Geodesy. In IGARSS 2018—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; Valencia, Spain, 22–27 July 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1399–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gisinger, C.; Eineder, M.; Brcic, R.; Balss, U.; Gruber, T.; Oikonomidou, X.; Heinze, M. First Experiences with Active C-Band Radar Reflectors and Sentinel-1. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2020—IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 26 September–2 October 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 6356–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luzi, G.; Espín-López, P.F.; Mira Pérez, F.; Monserrat, O.; Crosetto, M. A Low-Cost Active Reflector for Interferometric Monitoring Based on Sentinel-1 SAR Images. Sensors 2021, 21, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MetaSensing B.V. ECR-C Electronic Corner Reflector (Datasheet). 2022. Available online: https://metasensing.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MetaSensing-ecr-c.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2025).
- Fotiou, K.; Danezis, C. An Overview of Electronic Corner Reflectors and Their Use in Ground Deformation Monitoring Applications. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2020), Paphos, Cyprus, 26–29 August 2020; Proc. SPIE; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2020; Volume 11524, p. 115240N. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahapatra, P.S.; Samiei-Esfahany, S.; van der Marel, H.; Hanssen, R.F. On the Use of Transponders as Coherent Radar Targets for SAR Interferometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 1859–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jänichen, J.; Ziemer, J.; Wolsza, M.; Klöpper, D.; Weltmann, S.; Wicker, C.; Last, K.; Schmullius, C.; Dubois, C. Towards Operational Dam Monitoring with PS-InSAR and Electronic Corner Reflectors. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziemer, J.; Jänichen, J.; Wicker, C.; Klöpper, D.; Last, K.; Kalia, A.; Lege, T.; Schmullius, C.; Dubois, C. Assessing the Feasibility of Persistent Scatterer Data for Operational Dam Monitoring in Germany: A Case Study. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziemer, J.; Stein, G.; Wicker, C.; Jänichen, J.; Klöpper, D.; Last, K.; Denzler, J.; Schmullius, C.; Shadaydeh, M.; Dubois, C. Enhancing the Prediction of Dam Deformations: A Novel Data-Driven Approach. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezirksregierung Köln, Geobasis NRW. Bodenbewegungskataster NRW. Available online: https://www.bezreg-koeln.nrw.de/geobasis-nrw/produkte-und-dienste/bodenbewegungen/bodenbewegungskataster-nrw (accessed on 15 November 2025).
- Ruhrverband. Catchment of the river Ruhr and jurisdiction of the Ruhrverband. Available online: https://ruhrverband.de/flussgebiet/ (accessed on 14 April 2026).
- OpenStreetMap Contributors. Geometrische Daten der Bundesländer Deutschlands. Data Derived from OpenStreetMap and Licensed Under the Open Database License (ODbL). Available online: https://openstreetmap.org (accessed on 20 April 2022).
- Ruhrverband. Management of Water Resources in North Rhine-Westphalia. Available online: https://www.ruhrverband.de/ (accessed on 2 January 2026).
- Geodata Infrastructure North Rhine-Westphalia (GDI-NRW). 3D-Messdaten Laserscanning—Paketierung: Einzelkacheln. Available online: https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/geobasis/hm/3dm_l_las/3dm_l_las/ (accessed on 21 August 2025).
- European Space Agency (ESA). Sentinel-1 Data Products. Available online: https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-1 (accessed on 14 April 2026).
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Möhnetalsperre, Möhnesee, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2013, Teil A. Unpublished security report, 2013.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Möhnetalsperre, Möhnesee, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2020, Teil B. Unpublished security report, 2020.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Möhnetalsperre, Möhnesee, Germany); Vertiefte Überprüfung 2018. Analyse der Messdaten. Unpublished security report, 2018.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Versetalsperre, Lüdenscheid, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2020, Teil A. Unpublished security report, 2020.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Versetalsperre, Lüdenscheid, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2020, Teil B. Unpublished security report, 2020.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Biggetalsperre, Attendorn, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2019, Teil A. Unpublished security report, 2019.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Biggetalsperre, Attendorn, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2020, Teil B. Unpublished security report, 2020.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Sorpetalsperre, Sundern, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 1993, Teil A. Unpublished security report, 1993.
- Ruhrverband (Essen, Germany). (Sorpetalsperre, Sundern, Germany); Sicherheitsbericht 2020, Teil B. Unpublished security report, 2020.
- Ziemer, J.; Jänichen, J.; Wicker, C.; Last, K.; Schmullius, C.; Dubois, C. First Assessment of Electronic Corner Reflectors for Dam Monitoring in Germany—A Case Study. In Presented at the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2025 (LPS25), Vienna, Austria, 23–27 June 2025; Poster, Session B.04.05, 24 June 2025; European Space Agency: Paris, France, 2025; Available online: https://lps25.esa.int/programme/programme-session/?id=A3FC4D29-9678-4261-8931-2D9A08647661&presentationId=FFCB7401-315A-4A70-8076-D2B371847B66 (accessed on 21 August 2025).
- Mandal, D.; Vaka, D.S.; Bhogapurapu, N.R.; Vanama, V.S.K.; Kumar, V.; Rao, Y.S.; Bhattacharya, A. Sentinel-1 SLC Preprocessing Workflow for Polarimetric Applications: A Generic Practice for Generating Dual-pol Covariance Matrix Elements in SNAP S-1 Toolbox. Preprints 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancini, F.; Grassi, F. A Workflow Based on SNAP–StaMPS Open-Source Tools and GNSS Data for PSI-Based Ground Deformation Using Dual-Orbit Sentinel-1 Data: Accuracy Assessment with Error Propagation Analysis. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foumelis, M.; Delgado Blasco, J.M.; Desnos, Y.-L.; Engdahl, M.; Fernández, D.; Veci, L.; Lu, J.; Wong, C. ESA SNAP-StaMPS Integrated Processing for Sentinel-1 Persistent Scatterer Interferometry. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2018–IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain, 22–27 July 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1364–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado Blasco, J.M.; Ziemer, J.; Foumelis, M.; Dubois, C. SNAP2StaMPS v2: Increasing Features and Supported Sensors in the Open Source SNAP2StaMPS Processing Scheme. Zenodo. 2023. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/8362628 (accessed on 14 April 2026).
- Hooper, A.; Bekaert, D.; Hussain, E.; Spaans, K. StaMPS/MTI Manual Manual, Version 4.1b; University of Leeds: Leeds, UK, 2018; Available online: https://homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~earahoo/stamps/StaMPS_Manual_v4.1b1.pdf (accessed on 21 August 2025).
- Serco Italia SPA. StaMPS: Persistent Scatterer Interferometry Processing—Mexico City 2021, Version 1.1; RUS Copernicus Training Kit HAZA12; ESA/RUS Copernicus: Frascati, Italy, 2021; Available online: https://eo4society.esa.int/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/HAZA12_StaMPsPSI_Processing_Tutorial.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2026).
- Hooper, A.; Segall, P.; Zebker, H. Persistent Scatterer Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar for Crustal Deformation Analysis, with Application to Volcán Alcedo, Galápagos. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2007, 112, B07407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooper, A. A multi-temporal InSAR method incorporating both persistent scatterer and small baseline approaches. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35, L16302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooper, A.; Bekaert, D.; Spaans, K.; Arikan, M. Recent Advances in SAR Interferometry Time Series Analysis for Measuring Crustal Deformation. Tectonophysics 2012, 514–517, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agafonkin, V. Leaflet—An Open-Source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps. 2010. Available online: https://leafletjs.com (accessed on 21 August 2025).
- DIN 19700-10; Dam Structures—Part 10: General Provisions. DIN: Berlin, Germany, 2004.
- Brisco, B.; Brown, R.J.; Koehler, J.A.; Sofko, G.J.; McKibben, M.J. The diurnal pattern of microwave backscattering by wheat. Remote Sens. Environ. 1990, 34, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karmakar, P.K.; Sengupta, L.; Maiti, M.; Angelis, C.F. Some of the atmospheric influences on microwave propagation through atmosphere. Am. J. Sci. Res. 2010, 1, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufler, S.; Bauer-Marschallinger, B.; Hochstöger, S.; Wagner, W. Modelling and correcting azimuthal anisotropy in Sentinel-1 backscatter data. Remote Sens. Lett. 2018, 9, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias, M.; Campo-Bescós, M.Á.; Álvarez-Mozos, J. On the influence of acquisition geometry in backscatter time series over wheat. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022, 106, 102671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Small, D. Flattening Gamma: Radiometric Terrain Correction for SAR Imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011, 49, 3081–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Hajj, M.; Baghdadi, N.; Zribi, M.; Bazzi, H. Analysis of Sentinel-1 Radiometric Stability and Quality for Land Surface Applications. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, K.; Schwerdt, M.; Miranda, N.; Reimann, J. Radiometric Comparison within the Sentinel-1 SAR Constellation over a Wide Backscatter Range. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, K.; Schwerdt, M.; Hajduch, G.; Vincent, P.; Recchia, A.; Pinheiro, M. Radiometric Re-Compensation of Sentinel-1 SAR Data Products for Artificial Biases due to Antenna Pattern Changes. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarabandi, K.; Chiu, T.C. Optimum Corner Reflectors for Calibration of Imaging Radars. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1996, 44, 1348–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alpers, W.; Zhang, B.; Mouche, A.; Zeng, K.; Chan, P.W. Rain footprints on C-band synthetic aperture radar images of the ocean—Revisited. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 187, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crosetto, M.; Monserrat, O.; Cuevas-González, M.; Devanthéry, N.; Crippa, B. Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A Review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 115, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liedel, N.; Ziemer, J.; Jänichen, J.; Schmullius, C.; Dubois, C. Novel Amplitude-Based Approach for Reducing Sidelobes in Persistent Scatterer Interferometry Processing Using Spatially Variant Apodization. Sensors 2026, 26, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, K.; Deng, J.; Xu, Q.; Li, Z.; Shi, X.; Hancock, C.; Wen, N. Interpretation and Sensitivity Analysis of the InSAR Line-of-Sight to 3D Motion Components. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2022, 43, 5756–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAR-MPC. Sentinel-1 Annual Performance Report 2024, Version 2.1; ESA SAR-Mission Performance Cluster: 31 January 2025. Available online: https://sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/__attachments/1681272/DI-MPC-APR-0715%20-%20Sentinel-1%20Annual%20Performance%20Report%202024%20-%202.1.pdf?inst-v=aa4d6a19-10ba-4d86-8ad9-b06c3f577f80 (accessed on 6 November 2025).
- Meister, A.; Balasis-Levinsen, J.; Keller, K.; Pedersen, M.R.V.; Merryman Boncori, J.P.; Jensen, M. A Field Test of Compact Active Transponders for InSAR Geodesy. J. Geodetic Sci. 2024, 14, 20220164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luzi, G.; Espín-López, P.F.; Mira Pérez, F.; Monserrat, O.; Crosetto, M. A Low-Cost C-Band Active Reflector for InSAR Deformation Monitoring: Field Performance. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2024, XLVIII-3, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Z.; Motagh, M.; Li, T. Performance Analysis of Dihedral Corner Reflectors for Slope Movements: A Case Study from Aniangzhai Landslide in China. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022, 19, 4515605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, N.M.; Delaney, K.B.; Evans, S.G.; Deane, E.; Small, A.; Adria, D.A.M.; McDougall, S.; Ghahramani, N.; Take, W.A. Application of Sentinel-1 InSAR to Monitor Tailings Dams and Predict Geotechnical Instability: Practical Considerations Based on Case Study Insights. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2024, 83, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso-Díaz, A.; Roque, D.; Lima, J.N.; Rodríguez, J.L.; Solla, M. Improvement of InSAR Displacements Based on GNSS Station Calibration over Corner Reflector. Measurement 2025, 216, 118946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuhrmann, T.; Garthwaite, M.C.; McClusky, S. Investigating GNSS Multipath Effects Induced by Co-Located Radar Corner Reflectors. J. Appl. Geod. 2021, 15, 207–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crosetto, M.; Crippa, B.; Mróz, M.; Cuevas-González, M.; Shahbazi, S. Applications Based on EGMS Products: A Review. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2025, 37, 101452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cigna, F.; Esquivel Ramírez, R.; Tapete, D. Accuracy of Sentinel-1 PSI and SBAS InSAR Displacement Velocities against GNSS and Geodetic Leveling Monitoring Data. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi, Z.; Wright, T.J.; Hooper, A.J.; Jordan, C.; Novellino, A.; Bateson, L.; Biggs, J. Benchmarking and Inter-Comparison of Sentinel-1 InSAR Velocities and Time Series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 256, 112306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalia, A.C. Landslide Activity Detection Based on Nationwide Sentinel-1 PSI Datasets; DGK, Series C, Heft 917; Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities: Munich, Germany, 2023; Available online: https://publikationen.badw.de/de/049490097 (accessed on 5 November 2025).
- Ferretti, A.; Savio, G.; Barzaghi, R.; Borghi, A.; Musazzi, S.; Novali, F.; Prati, C.; Rocca, F. Submillimeter Accuracy of InSAR Time Series: Experimental Validation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 1142–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collilieux, X.; Courde, C.; Fruneau, B.; Aimar, M.; Schmidt, G.; Delprat, I.; Defresne, M.-A.; Pesce, D.; Bergerault, F.; Wöppelmann, G. Validation of a Corner Reflector Installation at Côte d’Azur Multi-Technique Geodetic Observatory. Adv. Space Res. 2022, 70, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Data | Sentinel-1 Ascending | Sentinel-1 Descending |
|---|---|---|
| Number of scenes (01/2023–06/2025) | 47–74 | 45–73 |
| Temporal resolution (days) | 12 | 12 |
| Acquisition mode | Interferometric Wide Swath (IW) | Interferometric Wide Swath (IW) |
| Polarization | VV | VV |
| Wavelength | C-Band | C-Band |
| Relative orbit number | 15 | 139 |
| Frame | 164 | 421 |
| Dam | Dam Type | Plumb: Interval—No. Points | Trigonometry: Interval—No. Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Möhne | Gravity Dam | daily—1 | semi-annual—27 |
| Lister | – | semi-annual—16 | |
| Sorpe | Embankment Dam | – | annual—10 |
| Bigge | – | annual—13 | |
| Verse | – | annual—5 |
| Value | Description | Default Setting | Adapted Setting |
|---|---|---|---|
| ref_centre_lonlat | Center coordinate reference point | - | individual |
| ref_radius | Radius surrounding reference point (m) | - | individual |
| scla_deramp | Phase ramp estimation for each interferogram | n | y |
| weed_neighbours | Flag for proximity weeding | n | y |
| max_topo_err | Maximum uncorrelated DEM error (m) | 20 m | 5 m |
| select_reest_gamma_flag | Re-estimating PS selection | y | n |
| Dam | Flight Geometry | Number Scenes | Mean | Median | Minimum | Maximum | ADI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Möhne | Ascending | 47 | 4.83 | 5.01 | 0.62 | 7.40 | 0.36 |
| Descending | 45 | 12.11 | 12.19 | 10.06 | 14.34 | 0.07 | |
| Sorpe | Ascending | 55 | 1.70 | 1.58 | −4.61 | 8.58 | 1.55 |
| Descending | 53 | 11.99 | 12.14 | 8.27 | 15.41 | 0.14 | |
| Bigge 1 | Ascending | 74 | 4.49 | 4.52 | 2.83 | 6.22 | 0.17 |
| Descending | 71 | 9.82 | 9.97 | 5.08 | 11.72 | 0.12 | |
| Bigge 2 | Ascending | 59 | 6.53 | 7.12 | 4.21 | 9.18 | 0.22 |
| Descending | 53 | 12.41 | 12.60 | 8.87 | 14.31 | 0.09 | |
| Lister | Ascending | 71 | 11.05 | 11.04 | 8.95 | 12.31 | 0.06 |
| Descending | 73 | 8.19 | 7.96 | 6.53 | 11.56 | 0.12 | |
| Verse | Ascending | 54 | 8.55 | 8.59 | 7.74 | 9.31 | 0.04 |
| Descending | 55 | 13.75 | 14.01 | 9.01 | 15.54 | 0.08 |
| ECR | Orbit | RMSE (mm) | MAE (mm) | Correlation | p Value | Std. Dev. 24 (mm) | Std. Dev. 31 (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bigge 1 | Ascending | 1.17 | 1.10 | 0.973 | 7.3493 × 10−36 | 1.77 | 1.73 |
| Descending | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.989 | 8.8265 × 10−44 | 1.61 | 1.57 | |
| Bigge 2 | Ascending | 2.43 | 1.83 | 0.892 | 2.3735 × 10−14 | 3.67 | 4.72 |
| Descending | 6.65 | 4.65 | −0.381 | 2.6347 × 10−3 | 3.58 | 3.70 | |
| Sorpe | Ascending | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.980 | 4.3457 × 10−34 | 3.55 | 3.09 |
| Descending | 2.05 | 1.62 | 0.947 | 2.8716 × 10−24 | 3.58 | 3.61 | |
| Verse | Ascending | 1.29 | 1.10 | 0.926 | 4.3746 × 10−15 | 2.49 | 2.99 |
| Descending | 4.16 | 3.42 | 0.161 | 3.5460 × 10−1 | 1.72 | 2.10 | |
| Lister | Ascending | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.980 | 9.8046 × 10−37 | 3.27 | 3.18 |
| Descending | 3.53 | 3.16 | 0.406 | 2.5511 × 10−3 | 2.38 | 2.38 | |
| Möhne | Ascending | 2.04 | 1.83 | 0.708 | 1.1966 × 10−5 | 1.43 | 1.65 |
| Descending | 1.15 | 0.78 | 0.924 | 3.0423 × 10−13 | 2.67 | 2.74 |
| ECR | Orbit | RMSE (mm) | MAE (mm) | Correlation | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bigge 1 | Ascending | 2.27 | 2.10 | 0.467 | 1.4797 × 10−1 |
| Descending | 7.34 | 6.83 | 0.087 | 7.9968 × 10−1 | |
| Bigge 2 | Ascending | 3.81 | 3.31 | 0.649 | 3.0685 × 10−2 |
| Descending | 4.16 | 3.08 | 0.421 | 2.2549 × 10−1 | |
| Sorpe | Ascending | 4.61 | 4.11 | 0.483 | 8.0919 × 10−1 |
| Descending | 4.02 | 3.09 | 0.097 | 7.6534 × 10−1 | |
| Verse | Ascending | 3.66 | 3.34 | 0.493 | 2.1452 × 10−1 |
| Descending | 3.45 | 2.42 | 0.123 | 7.7194 × 10−1 | |
| Lister | Ascending | 3.30 | 2.93 | 0.575 | 3.9614 × 10−2 |
| Descending | 7.37 | 6.69 | 0.158 | 6.0514 × 10−1 | |
| Möhne | Ascending | 1.14 | 0.91 | 0.442 | 4.9684 × 10−3 |
| Descending | 5.87 | 4.36 | −0.134 | 8.0077 × 10−1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Jänichen, J.; Ziemer, J.; Wicker, C.; Last, K.; Spieß, L.; Baade, J.; Schmullius, C.; Dubois, C. An Integrated Monitoring Concept for Dam Infrastructure: Operational PSI Service and Application of Electronic Corner Reflectors (ECR). Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081214
Jänichen J, Ziemer J, Wicker C, Last K, Spieß L, Baade J, Schmullius C, Dubois C. An Integrated Monitoring Concept for Dam Infrastructure: Operational PSI Service and Application of Electronic Corner Reflectors (ECR). Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(8):1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081214
Chicago/Turabian StyleJänichen, Jannik, Jonas Ziemer, Carolin Wicker, Katja Last, Lieselotte Spieß, Jussi Baade, Christiane Schmullius, and Clémence Dubois. 2026. "An Integrated Monitoring Concept for Dam Infrastructure: Operational PSI Service and Application of Electronic Corner Reflectors (ECR)" Remote Sensing 18, no. 8: 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081214
APA StyleJänichen, J., Ziemer, J., Wicker, C., Last, K., Spieß, L., Baade, J., Schmullius, C., & Dubois, C. (2026). An Integrated Monitoring Concept for Dam Infrastructure: Operational PSI Service and Application of Electronic Corner Reflectors (ECR). Remote Sensing, 18(8), 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081214

