Fine-Scale Spartina alterniflora Mapping Using Advanced Deep Learning and High-Resolution UAV Imagery
Highlights
- We construct UAV-SaSeg, the first high-resolution UAV semantic segmentation dataset tailored for complicated coastal invasive species scenarios.
- DINOSegNext achieves state-of-the-art performance for Spartina alterniflora mapping, with an IoU of 0.7420 and an F1-Score of 0.8519.
- The model effectively leverages generalized knowledge and spatial-frequency feature decoupling to suppress complex intertidal background noise.
- With a low inference latency of merely 8.5 ms per image, the proposed model is highly efficient and well-suited for onboard edge computing.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data
2.3. Methods
2.4. Accuracy Evaluation and Parameter Settings
2.5. Inference Implementation and Optimization Strategies
3. Results
3.1. Accuracy Evaluation and Efficiency Analysis
3.2. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Lightweight Models
3.3. Ablation Study
4. Discussion
4.1. Mitigation of Over-Prediction and Optimization of Feature Learning
4.2. Inference Efficiency and Frequency-Domain Optimization via Global Filter
4.3. Limitations and Future Work
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, M.; Mao, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Man, W.; Jia, M.; Ren, C.; Zhang, Y. Rapid Invasion of Spartina alterniflora in the Coastal Zone of Mainland China: New Observations from Landsat OLI Images. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, X.; Xiao, X.; Qiu, S.; Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Chang, Q.; Wu, J.; Li, B. Quantifying latitudinal variation in land surface phenology of Spartina alterniflora saltmarshes across coastal wetlands in China by Landsat 7/8 and Sentinel-2 images. Remote Sens. Environ. 2022, 269, 112810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Ke, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhou, D. Phenological heterogeneities of invasive Spartina alterniflora salt marshes revealed by high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Min, Y.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Han, Y.; Zhuo, Z.; Yin, X.; Zhou, D.; Ke, Y. Detection of large-scale Spartina alterniflora removal in coastal wetlands based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 imagery on Google Earth Engine. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 125, 103567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, X.; Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Qiu, S.; Pan, L.; Ma, J.; Ju, R.; Wu, J.; Li, B. Continual expansion of Spartina alterniflora in the temperate and subtropical coastal zones of China during 1985–2020. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 117, 103192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tian, J.; Wang, L.; Yin, D.; Li, X.; Diao, C.; Gong, H.; Shi, C.; Menenti, M.; Ge, Y.; Nie, S.; et al. Development of spectral-phenological features for deep learning to understand Spartina alterniflora invasion. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 242, 111745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Y.; Qin, F.; He, Y.; Liu, B.; Liu, C.; Pu, X.; Wan, F.; Qiao, X.; Qian, W. The effect of season on Spartina alterniflora identification and monitoring. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1044839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lv, Q.; Zhou, P.; Yang, S.; Shi, Y.; Ma, J.; Yang, J.; Chen, G. Provincial Scale Monitoring of Mangrove Area and Smooth Cordgrass Evasion in Subtropical China Using UAV Imagery and Machine-Learning Methods. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anderson, C.J.; Heins, D.; Pelletier, K.C.; Knight, J.F. Improving Machine Learning Classifications of Phragmites australis Using Object-Based Image Analysis. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tian, Y.; Jia, M.; Wang, Z.; Mao, D.; Du, B.; Wang, C. Monitoring Invasion Process of Spartina alterniflora by Seasonal Sentinel-2 Imagery and an Object-Based Random Forest Classification. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhuo, W.; Wu, N.; Shi, R.; Liu, P.; Zhang, C.; Fu, X.; Cui, Y. Aboveground biomass retrieval of wetland vegetation at the species level using UAV hyperspectral imagery and machine learning. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 166, 112365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abeysinghe, T.; Simic Milas, A.; Arend, K.; Hohman, B.; Reil, P.; Gregory, A.; Vázquez-Ortega, A. Mapping Invasive Phragmites australis in the Old Woman Creek Estuary Using UAV Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Classifiers. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Baibagyssov, A.; Magiera, A.; Thevs, N.; Waldhardt, R. Resource Characteristics of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) in the Syr Darya Delta, Kazakhstan, by Means of Remote Sensing and Random Forest. Plants 2025, 14, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Cui, G.; Liu, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, S.; Huang, X.; Zhang, R.; Jia, M.; Mao, D.; Yu, H.; et al. Dynamic Analysis of Spartina alterniflora in Yellow River Delta Based on U-Net Model and Zhuhai-1 Satellite. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Tan, Z.; Liu, X.; Li, M. Swin-UperNet: A Semantic Segmentation Model for Mangroves and Spartina alterniflora Loisel Based on UperNet. Electronics 2023, 12, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, J.; Xiu, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, C. Dual Path Attention Net for Remote Sensing Semantic Image Segmentation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Shi, H.; Dong, S.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, L. Dual-Path Sparse Hierarchical Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022, 19, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Higgisson, W.; Cobb, A.; Tschierschke, A.; Dyer, F. Estimating the cover of Phragmites australis using unmanned aerial vehicles and neural networks in a semi-arid wetland. River Res. Appl. 2021, 37, 1312–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xie, E.; Wang, W.; Yu, Z.; Anandkumar, A.; Alvarez, J.M.; Luo, P. SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 34, 12077–12090. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, C.; Gao, C.; Wang, J.; Yu, G.; Shen, C.; Sang, N. Bisenet v2: Bilateral network with guided aggregation for real-time semantic segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021, 129, 3051–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Howard, A.; Sandler, M.; Chu, G.; Chen, L.-C.; Chen, B.; Tan, M.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Pang, R.; Vasudevan, V. Searching for mobilenetv3. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 27 October–2 November 2019; pp. 1314–1324. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zuo, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.; Cheng, S. Light-Adapspnet: A Lightweight Adaptive Weighted Semantic Segmentation Network Based on Pspnet for Extracting Spartina Alterniflora in the Yellow River Delta Wetland. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2026, 242, 111338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Ren, G.; Wu, P.; Wang, J.; Zhu, W.; Xin, H.; Fu, S.; Xu, H.; Ma, Y. Remote Sensing Identification and Mapping of Spartina Alterniflora in Chinese Mainland Coastal at 2 m Spatial Resolution. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2026, 19, 399–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, B.; Xu, M.; Tian, J.; Jia, M.; Mao, D.; Cheng, K.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, H.; Song, J.; Ke, Y.; et al. National-scale sub-meter mapping of Spartina alterniflora in mainland China 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2025, 17, 6601–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Siméoni, O.; Vo, H.V.; Seitzer, M.; Baldassarre, F.; Oquab, M.; Jose, C.; Khalidov, V.; Szafraniec, M.; Yi, S.; Ramamonjisoa, M. Dinov3. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.10104. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, M.; Zan, Y.; Khoshelham, K.; Ji, S. Domain generalization for semantic segmentation of remote sensing images via vision foundation model fine-tuning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2025, 230, 126–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, Z.; Li, Y.; Ma, R.; Liang, C. Applying Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation to High-Resolution UAV Imagery for Enhanced Road Scene Parsing. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.02985. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, P.; Gao, Y.; Li, W.; Gao, Q.; Pan, F. AeriaICLIP: Lightweight Open-Vocabulary Segmentation for UAV-Based Aerial Images. In Proceedings of the 2025 44th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Chongqing, China, 28–30 July 2025; pp. 8193–8198. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, M.-H.; Lu, C.-Z.; Hou, Q.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, M.-M.; Hu, S.-M. Segnext: Rethinking convolutional attention design for semantic segmentation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2022, 35, 1140–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rao, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, J.; Zhou, J. Global filter networks for image classification. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 34, 980–993. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M.M.; Munir, M.; Marculescu, R. EMCAD: Efficient Multi-Scale Convolutional Attention Decoding for Medical Image Segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 16–22 June 2024; pp. 11769–11779. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L.; He, B.; Chen, H. CSNet: A Remote Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation Network Based on Coordinate Attention and Skip Connections. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, X.; Li, W.; Hong, D.; Tao, R.; Du, Q. Deep Learning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Object Detection and Tracking: A survey. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 2022, 10, 91–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jo, W.-K.; Go, S.-H.; Park, J.-H. Optimizing Onboard Deep Learning and Hybrid Models for Resource-Constrained Aerial Operations: A UAV-Based Adaptive Monitoring Framework for Heterogeneous Urban Forest Environments. Preprints 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Loshchilov, I.; Hutter, F. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Toulon, France, 24–26 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Micikevicius, P.; Narang, S.; Alben, J.; Diamos, G.; Elsen, E.; Garcia, D.; Ginsburg, B.; Houston, M.; Kuchaev, O.; Venkatesh, G.; et al. Mixed Precision Training. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.03740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shi, S.; Wang, Q.; Xu, P.; Chu, X. Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Software Tools. In Proceedings of the 2016 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data (CCBD), Macau, China, 16–18 November 2016; pp. 99–104. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Sun, K.; Cheng, T.; Jiang, B.; Deng, C.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, D.; Mu, Y.; Tan, M.; Wang, X.; et al. Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019, 43, 3349–3364. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Xiong, Z.; Bhattacharyya, S.P. PIDNet: A real-time semantic segmentation network inspired by PID controllers. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–24 June 2023; pp. 19529–19539. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Zheng, J.-Q.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, G.; Li, L. Mamba-unet: Unet-like pure visual mamba for medical image segmentation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.05079. [Google Scholar]
- Aleissaee, A.A.; Kumar, A.; Anwer, R.M.; Khan, S.; Cholakkal, H.; Xia, G.-S.; Khan, F.S. Transformers in Remote Sensing: A Survey. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Geirhos, R.; Rubisch, P.; Michaelis, C.; Bethge, M.; Wichmann, F.; Brendel, W. ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1811.12231. [Google Scholar]
- Dosovitskiy, A.; Beyer, L.; Kolesnikov, A.; Weissenborn, D.; Zhai, X.; Unterthiner, T.; Dehghani, M.; Minderer, M.; Heigold, G.; Gelly, S.; et al. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.11929. [Google Scholar]
- Caron, M.; Touvron, H.; Misra, I.; Jégou, H.; Mairal, J.; Bojanowski, P.; Joulin, A. Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada, 10–17 October 2021; pp. 9630–9640. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, T.-Y.; Goyal, P.; Girshick, R.B.; He, K.; Dollár, P. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017, 42, 318–327. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.; Strong, D.R.; Pennings, S.C.; Zhang, Y. Provenance-by-environment interaction of reproductive traits in the invasion of Spartina alterniflora in China. Ecology 2017, 98, 1591–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, Z.; Yan, H.; Zhan, Q.; Yang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, C.; Lei, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y. A Survey on Remote Sensing Foundation Models: From Vision to Multimodality. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.22081. [Google Scholar]











| Spatial Resolution | Spectral Bands | Total Number | Open Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02 m | R, G, B | 358 | Yes |
| Model Name | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | IoU | OA | Latency (ms) | FLOPs (G) | Params (M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SegFormer | 0.4762 | 0.8768 | 0.6172 | 0.4463 | 0.9793 | 11.0 | 62.4 | 27.5 |
| HRNet | 0.6272 | 0.6137 | 0.6204 | 0.4496 | 0.9855 | 14.0 | 40 | 29.5 |
| PIDNet | 0.5287 | 0.9031 | 0.667 | 0.5003 | 0.9827 | 9.0 | 78.5 | 12.4 |
| SegNeXt | 0.7635 | 0.8644 | 0.8108 | 0.6818 | 0.9895 | 12.5 | 34.9 | 27.6 |
| MobileSeg | 0.7688 | 0.8680 | 0.8154 | 0.6883 | 0.9898 | 9.5 | 13 | 5.6 |
| Mamba-UNet | 0.7915 | 0.8433 | 0.8167 | 0.6902 | 0.9905 | 25.0 | 70 | 18 |
| DINOsegNext (ours) | 0.8245 | 0.8812 | 0.8519 | 0.7420 | 0.9931 | 8.5 | 28.5 | 22.5 |
| Model Name | Publication Journal | Principle |
|---|---|---|
| SegFormer | NeurIPS (2021) | SegFormer abandons positional encoding and employs a hierarchical Transformer encoder (MiT) to output multi-scale features. It introduces a lightweight “All-MLP” decoder that aggregates information across layers, striking a trade-off between efficiency and performance. |
| HRNet | IEEE TPAMI (2021) | Unlike traditional encoders that downsample images to recover semantics, HRNet maintains high-resolution representations throughout the entire process. It connects high- to low-resolution convolutions in parallel and repeatedly performs multi-scale fusion to preserve rich spatial details. |
| PIDNet | CVPR (2023) | Inspired by PID controllers in control theory, PIDNet utilizes a three-branch architecture: a Proportional (P) branch for high-resolution details, an Integral (I) branch for long-range context, and a Derivative (D) branch to model high-frequency boundary features, effectively reducing the “overshoot” effect at object boundaries. |
| SegNeXt | NeurIPS (2022) | SegNeXt revisits the advantages of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). It proposes Multi-Scale Convolutional Attention (MSCA) to simulate the large receptive field of Transformers using cheap convolutions, proving that a well-designed CNN can outperform Transformers in efficiency. |
| MobileSeg | arXiv (2023) | Designed specifically for mobile devices, it adopts a Coupled-Branch structure to decouple semantic and detailed information. It utilizes a Stride-16 aggregation strategy and pre-fusion mechanisms to maximize inference speed while maintaining competitive accuracy on edge hardware. |
| Mamba-UNet | arXiv (2024) | Incorporating the State Space Model (SSM) into a U-shaped architecture, Mamba-UNet leverages the Mamba block’s linear computational complexity to model long-range dependencies. It overcomes the quadratic complexity bottleneck of Transformers and is well-suited to processing high-resolution biomedical or remote-sensing images. |
| Model Name | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | IoU | OA | Latency (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | 0.7315 | 0.8950 | 0.8050 | 0.6736 | 0.9865 | 11.2 |
| proposed | 0.8245 | 0.8812 | 0.8519 | 0.7420 | 0.9931 | 8.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, Z.; Tang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Chu, B.; Long, Z.; Xie, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Fine-Scale Spartina alterniflora Mapping Using Advanced Deep Learning and High-Resolution UAV Imagery. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142375
Chen Z, Tang Y, Hu Y, Chu B, Long Z, Xie D, Zhang Y, Wang Z. Fine-Scale Spartina alterniflora Mapping Using Advanced Deep Learning and High-Resolution UAV Imagery. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(14):2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142375
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Zegang, Yixing Tang, Yulong Hu, Bin Chu, Zhong Long, Dong Xie, Yunfei Zhang, and Zhipan Wang. 2026. "Fine-Scale Spartina alterniflora Mapping Using Advanced Deep Learning and High-Resolution UAV Imagery" Remote Sensing 18, no. 14: 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142375
APA StyleChen, Z., Tang, Y., Hu, Y., Chu, B., Long, Z., Xie, D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2026). Fine-Scale Spartina alterniflora Mapping Using Advanced Deep Learning and High-Resolution UAV Imagery. Remote Sensing, 18(14), 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142375

