Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Lunar South Pole Landing Sites Using Self-Organizing Maps for Scientific and Engineering Purposes
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Stage Deep Learning Framework for Individual Tree Crown Detection and Delineation in Mixed-Wood Forests Using High-Resolution Light Detection and Ranging Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Frequent Glacial Hazard Deformation Detection Based on POT-SBAS InSAR in the Sedongpu Basin in the Himalayan Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Monitoring of Landslide Activity in a Debris Flow Gully Using SBAS-InSAR: A Case Study of Shawan Gully, China

1
Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2
Key Laboratory of Geohazard Forecast and Geoecological Restoration in Plateau Mountainous Area, Kunming 650216, China
3
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Intelligent Monitoring and Spatiotemporal Big Data Governance of Natural Resources, Kunming 650216, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(9), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091580
Submission received: 8 April 2025 / Revised: 24 April 2025 / Accepted: 25 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025

Abstract

:
Shawan Gully historically experienced recurrent debris flow events, resulting in significant losses of life and property. The Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides are two major high-elevation landslides in Shawan Gully, serving as primary sources of debris flow material. To monitor landslides movements, this study used interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) and Sentinel-1 SAR imagery acquired between 2014 and 2023 to analyze surface deformation in Shawan Gully. Prior to InSAR processing, we assessed the InSAR measurement suitability of the involved SAR images in detail based on geometric distortion and monitoring sensitivity. Compared to conventional SBAS-InSAR results without preprocessing, the suitability-refined datasets show improvements in interferometric phase quality (1.55 rad to 1.41 rad) and estimation accuracy (1.45 mm to 1.18 mm). By processing ascending, descending, and cross-track Sentinel-1 SAR images, we obtained multi-directional surface displacements in Shawan Gully. The results reveal significant deformation in the NL1 region of Nuole landslide, while the northern scarp and the foot of the slope exhibited different movement characteristics, indicating spatially variable deformation mechanisms. The study also revealed that the Nuole landslide exhibits a high sensitivity to rainfall-induced instability, with rainfall significantly changing its original movement trend.

1. Introduction

Landslides and debris flows are two major natural hazards globally [1,2,3]. In canyon areas with complex topography, landslides are usually the main source of debris flows [4,5]. Significant topographic enhances triggered by landslide events can directly or indirectly amplify subsequent debris flows by changing the availability and distribution of source materials [6,7,8]. In the 2010 debris flow disaster in Zhouqu, large-scale landslides and slope failures transported substantial volumes of loose material into the gullies, significantly enhancing the scale and destructive power of the debris flow [9,10]. Similarly, in August 2014, prolonged heavy rainfall in the Hiroshima region of Japan triggered slopes’ failures, which subsequently led to large-scale debris flows, resulting in massive casualties and property damage [11,12]. Landslide failures are typically preceded by a long-term creeping stage [13,14]. During this time, continuous monitoring of surface deformation on landslides can effectively capture subtle changes, providing early warning and defensive guidance for landslides’ instability and the concomitant debris flows [15,16]. However, as most such landslides usually occur in mountainous regions that are difficult to access, continuous surface deformation monitoring remains a challenge [17,18].
As a well-validated microwave remote sensing methodology, InSAR provides a long-term observation of surface dynamics [19,20]. Compared to other techniques, thanks to its robustness in various weather conditions, continuous temporal coverage, high measurement accuracy, and large-scale observation capacity, modern InSAR methodologies revolutionized our capacity to characterize surface deformation processes [21,22,23,24,25]. In mountain areas where field surveying and traditional remote sensing methods are in limited supply, time series InSAR (TS-InSAR), represented by small baseline subset InSAR (SBAS-InSAR), has become one of the preferred approaches for studying landslides or other geological disasters [26,27,28]. Over the past two decades, continuous improvements in SAR data processing strategies and InSAR analytical methods enabled us to more accurately simulate the landslide displacement trends [29,30,31]. Furthermore, with the growing accessibility of diverse SAR datasets and acquisition modes, the operational efficiency of InSAR significantly improved, allowing for landslide monitoring with higher spatio-temporal continuity [32,33,34].
Receiving echo signals from target areas by SAR sensors is a fundamental prerequisite for successful InSAR applications. In mountainous canyon terrains, the spatial relationship between ground surface and satellite constantly changes, introducing uncertainties in deformation signal transmission and causing geometric distortions in SAR imagery [35]. Shadow and layover phenomena may result in phase loss or overlap, disrupting the continuity of phase unwrapping and reducing monitoring accuracy and reliability [36,37,38]. Changes in slope and aspect may influence the monitoring sensitivity of InSAR, further compromising the reliability of monitoring results [39,40,41]. In addition, InSAR measurements can only reflect displacements in the line-of-sight (LOS) direction [42,43]. In complex terrains, this limitation poses a substantial challenge to accurately analyzing landslide deformation mechanisms and kinematic behavior [44,45]. Therefore, in order to achieve high-reliability monitoring of landslide movement, it is necessary to pre-evaluate the suitability of SAR images for InSAR deformation monitoring in target areas.
Shawan Gully is situated within the Xiaojiang River Basin and is strongly affected by the Xiaojiang fault. In the past few decades, frequent debris flows occurred in this area, severely damaging downstream farmlands and structures. The Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides, situated in the upper reaches of Shawan Gully, are two large high-elevation landslides that serve as the primary material sources for debris flow events. Under continuous vertical incision and lateral erosion, both landslides experience secondary sliding each year, with volumes ranging from dozens of cubic meters to tens of thousands of cubic meters.
To assess slope activity within the Shawan Gully, this study used SBAS-InSAR and 688 Sentinel-1A acquisitions from three orbits to measure surface displacements in the region. Based on the geometric distortion and monitoring sensitivity, the InSAR monitoring suitability of the involved SAR imagery for landslide analysis in the Shawan Gully watershed was assessed, which identified the applicable and non-applicable datasets for this study. In addition, several permanent scatterer ground control points (PS-GCPs) were extracted by comprehensively considering the phase, scattering, coherence, and deformation trend [46]. During the SBAS-InSAR processing, these PS-GCPs were utilized to adjust baseline errors and eliminate the flattening effect, thereby improving interferogram quality and deformation estimation accuracy. Given the complexity of terrain and the high activity of rainfall-induced landslides, this study provides a representative case for exploring the effectiveness and reliability of InSAR-based monitoring in debris flow-prone mountain gullies.

2. Study Area and Datasets

2.1. Study Area

Shawan Gully is situated within the Xiaojiang River Basin (Figure 1). This major channel spans ~10.32 km in length, with a watershed area of ~17.97 km2 [47]. Since 1990, frequent debris flows have been recorded in Shawan Gully due to the continuous material supplying from the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides. These disasters resulted in more than 50 casualties and forced the relocation of nearly 400 households [48].
The Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides serve as principal contributors of material for debris flows within Shawan Gully, accounting for 52.97% of the total volume. These two landslides, with an elevation difference of over 700 m, are typical high-elevation landslides. The Nuole landslide has a maximum thickness of ~130 m, with an estimated volume of solid material at ~1.47 × 108 m3 [49]. A fault of interbedded sandstone and shale intersects the rear edge. Influenced by the cumulative effects of gravitational forces, hydrostatic pressure within the bedrock fractures, and undercutting at the toe, this dip slope landslide is prone to movement along the bedding planes. Continuous headward erosion carved a large, deep channel, effectively dividing the Nuole landslide into two distinct sections, NL1 and NL2. Owing to past geological hazards, a tensile crack (Tc1) developed in the NL1 region of the Nuole landslide, stretching ~1.26 km in length with a maximum width greater than 50 m. Nuole Village is situated at a flat elevation of ~2370 m. Two minor cracks (Mc1 and Mc2) and two landslide steps (Ls1 and Ls2) developed in the surroundings. The length of the landslide scarp (blue line in Figure 1c) in the northern NL1 region was ~1.61 km.
The Huajiaoshu landslide, situated on the northern side of the main gully, has a solid reserve of approximately 3.20 × 107 m3, with its main slip oriented at 230°. The lithology mainly consists of shale and sandstone, featuring rock fragmentation and the development of fissures. A tensile crack (Tc2) approximately 0.66 km long divides the Huajiaoshu landslide into northern and southern sections. Additionally, two minor cracks (Mc3 and Mc4) and two landslide steps (Ls3 and Ls4) developed.

2.2. Datasets

In the study, three groups of Sentinel-1 SAR imagery acquired from 2014 to 2023 were collected. The basic parameters that are listed in Table 1: 255 scenes are from the descending orbit path 62 (S1DP62), and the remaining 433 scenes are from two different ascending orbits, path 26 (S1AP26) and path 128 (S1AP128). Observations from three distinct viewpoints facilitated mitigated negative effects by terrains [30]. When importing Sentinel-1 data, orbit errors were corrected with precise orbit data. During InSAR processing, temporal and perpendicular baseline thresholds of 72 d and 300 m, respectively, were applied to attenuate the effects caused by spatial–temporal incoherence. The spatial–temporal baseline networks for the three small baseline datasets are shown in Figure 2.
Moreover, a high-resolution (5 m) DEM was used to precisely assess the InSAR suitability within the Shawan Gully, which was also applied to generate slope and aspect maps. Atmospheric delay corrections were applied using GACOS ZTD data, accessible via http://www.gacos.net/ (accessed on 24 May 2024). Precipitation data from 2014 to 2021 were obtained from daily records at Dongchuan Station, managed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. For the years 2022 to 2023, we utilized average values from comparable periods in previous years. The optical imagery and base topographic maps were obtained from Google Earth and ArcGIS Pro, respectively, and were used for background mapping and auxiliary interpretation.

3. Materials and Methods

The topography of Shawan Gully is extremely rugged, with large elevation gradients across the region. To ensure the effective acquisition of surface deformation signals from the main targets (Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides), we assessed the InSAR suitability of Sentinel-1 SAR datasets in the region according to an analysis of geometric distortion and monitoring sensitivity, taking into account the imaging properties of the Sentinel-1 satellite. Then, we selected SAR images from the optimal orbits for SBAS-InSAR time series analysis. Figure 3 provides an overview of the technical scheme.

3.1. Geometric Distortion Identification

The limitations of using InSAR to monitor surface deformation in alpine canyon regions primarily arise from uncertainties related to topographical factors [50,51]. Side-looking radar imaging in highly undulating terrain inevitably leads to geometric distortions (Figure 4) [36,52]. When the slope is oriented towards the sensor, the radar signal compresses in the range direction due to uneven terrain, causing foreshortening or layover (segment b–a in Figure 4). Conversely, if the incidence angle exceeds the complementary slope angle, the satellite cannot capture the surface on the shadowed slope, resulting in an active shadow (segment d–e in Figure 4). Layovers and shadows significantly impact the interpretation and interferometry of SAR images. In the layover regions, the radar signal compression leads to abnormal changes in backscattering intensity and phase values [53]. No radar signal transmission occurs in shadowed areas.
Accurate classification results of geometric distortion are helpful for terrain visibility analysis. Two principal methods for identifying geometric distortions are the Layover and Shadow Map method (LSM) and the R-index model [54,55]. The LSM method is highly accurate in identifying shadows (active or passive) and layovers (active or passive), and the R-index model can effectively separate active layover, foreshortening, and visible areas [39,56]. This study combined the LSM and R-index models to accurately classify geometric distortions by simulating surface visibility. Initially, the LSM method was used to extract shadow and layover (including far- and near-) regions in the SAR imagery. Following the initial classification by the LSM, the R-index model was applied to accurately classify good visibility (GV) areas, foreshortening (FS), active layover (AL), passive layover (PL), active shadow (ASh), and passive shadow (PSh). If the target area predominantly falls within active/passive layover zones or active/passive shadow zones, it indicates that the dataset from this orbit has low applicability in the study area.

3.2. InSAR Monitoring Sensitivity Analysis

InSAR monitoring sensitivity refers to the ability of SAR sensors to detect surface deformations in different terrains [50]. Influenced by topography, vegetation, and atmospheric conditions, the Sentinel-1 satellite exhibits varied deformation detection capabilities across different slope units in both ascending and descending orbits [40]. This capability can be quantified based on sensitivity levels.
Figure 5 shows the spatial relationship between LOS displacement (VLOS) and actual slope displacement. The down-slope direction along the slope surface is considered the actual direction of slope displacement (VSlope), and InSAR deformation monitoring sensitivity can be expressed as [57]:
C i n d e x = V L O S / V S l o p e = u γ .
The theoretical values of the C-index range from −1 to 1. A |C-index| value approaching 1 corresponds to an increased monitoring sensitivity and a greater reliability of the InSAR measurement. Conversely, an |C-index| value closer to 0 indicates means that the monitoring sensitivity is lower and the InSAR measurement is less reliable. A negative C-index value indicates that the surface area theoretically should be moving away from the satellite. The u and γ are the deformation unit vectors in the LOS and actual directions, while u = γ = 1 . Decomposing the vectors u and γ into the north-east-up (N-E-U) coordinate system:
u = u N u E u U = sin φ sin θ cos φ sin θ cos θ
γ = γ N γ E γ U = cos α cos β sin α cos β sin β
where θ represents the radar incidence angle, and φ represents the angle between the satellite flight direction and the north direction. In Equation (3), α is the slope aspect and β is the slope gradient.

3.3. Surface Deformation Measurements

3.3.1. PS-GCPs Selection

We processed all the SAR datasets using the SBAS-InSAR method. The methodological details are not repeated herein, and the specific steps can be found in previous studies [58,59]. The conventional SBAS method may suffer from omissions and misselections due to the sidelobe effect, which can lead to low coherence, phase instability, and potential residual phase jumps during phase unwrapping [60]. To mitigate this issue, we proposed an approach that utilizes stable GCPs to refine the satellite orbit and re-flatten the images [46]. Collecting stable GCPs with high spatial density from the ground using conventional methods is challenging, particularly for study areas that cover broad regions. In this study, we selected pixels with persistent scattering characteristics to serve as PS-GCPs. For Gaussian scatterer pixels, PS-GCPs ensure high coherence, signal-to-noise ratio, and phase stability even in cases of low overall surface coherence.
In this processing, interferograms were first generated using a common master SLC image. Typically, selecting an image acquired near the temporal center of the dataset as the super master image is more advantageous to evaluate the long-term coherence and phase stability of pixels. The super master images used in the study were acquired on 13 July 2019 (ascending orbit 26), 6 September 2019 (ascending orbit 128), and 15 July 2019 (descending orbit 62). Then, temporal coherence (TC) and amplitude dispersion index (ADI) were calculated, and the appropriate thresholds TTC and TADI were set to filter potential PS-GCP candidates. ADI was calculated according to the Equation (5):
A D I = σ A / α ¯
where σ A represents the standard deviation of the mean amplitude, and α ¯ represents the mean time series amplitude. A lower ADI value indicates higher phase stability of the pixel [61]. Based on the thresholds TTC and TADI, PS-GCP candidate points were preliminarily detected. Furthermore, the candidate points were refined through the linear deformation residuals to obtain PS-GCPs with high coherence, high signal-to-noise ratio, and stable deformation. PS-GCPs not only enhance the accuracy of data processing as verification and correction tools, but also maintain the consistency and reliability of the analysis in complex environments, such as in urban or densely vegetated areas.

3.3.2. Displacement Components Estimation in Vertical and Horizontal Directions

The surface deformation results calculated by SBAS-InSAR have limitations when analyzing landslide movement patterns. Projecting the LOS deformation into the three-dimensional directions (N-E-U) is a common solution that helps in the refined analysis of landslide activity [62,63]. The projection relationship is shown below [64]:
V L O S = A V N E U
where V L O S represents the LOS deformation vector, and V N E U represents the three-dimensional deformation vector. A is an m × n coefficient matrix, where m and n, respectively, represent the number of V L O S and the three-dimensional deformation components. For any LOS InSAR monitoring result:
V l o s = n N S V N S + n E W V E W + n U D V U D
where Vlos, VN-S, VE-W, and VU-D represent the displacements in the LOS, north–south (N-S), east–west (E-W), and up–down (U-D), respectively. The unit vectors for these deformation components are denoted as n N S , n E W , and n U D . When m ≥ n, the optimal or unique solution for the three-dimensional deformation components can be estimated [65]. However, this study only used two datasets from Sentinel-1 ascending and descending orbits. Equation (6) is rewritten as a two-dimensional projection model [66]:
V L O S = A V E U
V l o s A s c V l o s D e s c = cos φ A s c · sin θ A s c cos θ A s c cos φ D e s c · sin θ D e s c cos θ D e s c V E W V U D
where θ is the radar incidence angle, and φ is the satellite flight direction.

4. Results

4.1. Suitability Assessment of InSAR Measurements

4.1.1. SAR Imagery Availability Analysis

Figure 6 presents the simulation results of the surface geometric distortions and terrain visibility in the Shawan Gully. A 5 m resolution DEM was used in the simulation step to visualize the terrain details. The local incidence angles of the study area surface relative to the satellite sensor on the three orbits were calculated to simulate a more realistic terrain visibility (Figure 6a–c). In comparison, the surface is less susceptible to geometric distortions on the SAR images from S1DP62, with both the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslide within the good visibility terrains. Shadow is prone to generate on the collapses BT1 and BT2, while the BT3 region is susceptible to layover. The S1AP26 has good visibility of the Nuole landslide, but is affected by layover at the base of the Huajiaoshu landslide. The Shawan Gully is particularly vulnerable to layover and shadow on the path S1AP128 because of the small incidence angle, making it difficult to effectively measure the whole Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslide.
In the SAR imagery from S1DP62, the proportion of the surface with good visibility is 78.23%, significantly higher than other types of geometric distortions. However, it only accounts for 26.61% and 25.73% in the SAR imagery of ascending orbits S1AP26 and S1AP128, respectively (Figure 6g). Additionally, in S1AP128, the area of layover accounts for 26.85%, surpassing the area with good visibility. Thus, the spatial distribution and quantitative statistics of geometric distortions indicate that the SAR imagery from S1AP128 is severely affected by layover and shadow, making it unsuitable for refined monitoring of the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides.

4.1.2. Reliability Analysis of InSAR Measurements

Figure 7 delineates the theoretical model of InSAR monitoring sensitivity. Assuming that only the slope and aspect are considered, higher monitoring sensitivities are observed for terrains ranging from 0° to 168° and from 348° to 360° in the Sentinel-1 ascending S1AP26 and S1AP128. On these surfaces, the monitoring sensitivity gradually increases as the slope increases. In the descending orbit, the Sentinel-1 satellite has a higher monitoring sensitivity for slopes with a gradient between 12° and 198°. With an identical slope gradient, monitoring sensitivity increases as the slope aspect aligns more closely with the LOS direction, reaching its minimum in the satellite azimuth direction. If the slope aspect is constant, the monitoring sensitivity increases with the rise of the slope gradient. The impact of geometric distortions on monitoring sensitivity is illustrated in Figure 7d–f.
As shown in Table 2, the InSAR monitoring sensitivities of the involved Sentinel-1 SAR datasets were classified into different levels, and the results are presented in Figure 8. The S1DP62 orbit demonstrates a higher monitoring sensitivity to the surface within the Shawan Gully. On this orbit, the area of InSAR monitoring with high sensitivity reaches 64.32%, encompassing most of the slope surfaces of the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides. In contrast, the ascending orbits S1AP26 and S1AP128 primarily exhibit low sensitivity, with high-sensitivity areas of less than 25%. Moreover, the areas insensitive to InSAR monitoring across the three orbits are minimal, with even the highest proportion on the S1AP128 orbit being only 0.31%. Therefore, it can be considered that the SAR images from all three orbits are credible in monitoring the study area, with S1DP62 providing the highest reliability. In the study, regions affected by layover and shadow were removed prior to interferometric processing to prevent the propagation of unwrapping errors caused by geometric distortions.

4.2. Deformation Monitoring and Kinematic Patterns Assessment

4.2.1. PS-GCP Detection and Identification

To ensure an even distribution of PS-GCPs, the study area was divided into several 5 km × 5 km sub-regions. The TTC and TADI were set to 0.9 and 0.35, respectively. Subsequently, we utilized terrain phase residuals to thin the PS-GCPs, with the results shown in Figure 9. On orbits S1AP26, S1AP128, and S1DP62, 26, 31, and 40 PS-GCPs were identified, respectively (Figure 9a–c). Only two PS-GCPs had identical spatial locations across the three orbits, whereas ten PS-GCPs were derived from the same locations from the two ascending orbits. These PS-GCPs were primarily selected from the Jinyuan Town and mountainous areas distant from the study area. After corrections with high-precision DEM, the topographic phase residuals of these PS-GCPs were essentially eliminated (Figure 9d–f).
The coherence coefficient was determined by the phase consistency of pixels within a time series. Higher coherence indicates greater consistency of radar observations at different times, with less phase variation. The amplitude dispersion index measures the variability of pixel amplitude within a time series. A lower amplitude dispersion index indicates more stable radar reflectance amplitudes over time. An analysis of the relationship between coherence coefficients and amplitude dispersion indices of the PS-GCPs revealed a negative correlation (Figure 9g–i). This implies that pixels with higher coherence exhibit lower variability in radar amplitude, potentially due to more stable surface characteristics or location in areas with less environmental change. In SBAS-InSAR processing, these PS-GCPs with known positions can be used as reference points to calibrate and adjust the geometric accuracy of interferograms, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of InSAR measurements. Additionally, since PS-GCPs provide stable radar reflection signals, they can overcome the effects of complex environmental changes, such as vegetation cover.

4.2.2. Multi-Orbit SBAS-InSAR Surface Deformation Measurements

Before to the SBAS-InSAR processing, it was necessary to preprocess the SAR images based on terrain visibility and monitoring sensitivity. We masked the layover, shadow, and insensitive areas in the SAR images prior to the interfering step to mitigate the negative impacts of those phenomena on the InSAR measurement. Using the SARscape software, we thinned the SAR images from three orbits and utilized SBAS-InSAR to estimate the surface deformation. Figure 10 presents the LOS deformation velocities for the three orbits. A positive deformation value indicates displacement towards the satellite, while a negative value indicates displacement in the opposite direction. The magnitude of these values is associated with slope activity, where larger values suggest poorer slope stability and more intense activity.
Figure 10 shows that the mid and lower reaches of the Shawan Gully are stable, while significant deformations are primarily detected in the NL1 region of the Nuole landslide. The surface deformation velocity in Jinyuan Town, located downstream, ranges from −20 to 0 mm/year. Due to the impact of layover, effective monitoring of the full surface deformation in Shawan Gully is limited when using Sentinel-1 imagery acquired from S1AP128 (Figure 10a,b). Nevertheless, this orbit can still capture significant deformation at the rear, bottom slopes, and northern scarp of the NL1 region. The fastest deformation velocity at the bottom slope is 94.64 mm/year, and −89.14 mm/year at the northern scarp. The SAR images from the orbits S1AP26 and S1DP62 detected more comprehensive surface deformations of Shawan Gully (Figure 10c,d). For the unstable regions of the Nuole landslide, the LOS deformations calculated from S1AP26 align well with those from the S1AP128, while the S1DP62 reveals a broader extent of significant displacements. Around Nuole Village, the surface deformation velocity in the both S1AP26 and S1AP128 ranges from −20 to 20 mm/year. In the S1DP62, the Nuole landslide exhibits displacement away from the sensor, with the fastest slope deformation velocity of −139.82 mm/year occurring below Nuole Village. The Huajiaoshu landslide appears generally stable in the monitoring results from both the orbits S1AP26 and S1DP62, with only minor significant deformations detected at the bottom, the maximum deformation velocities being 39.42 mm/year and −37.95 mm/year, respectively. Additionally, the S1DP62 dataset also reveals significant displacements of area BT2, with a maximum velocity of −43.32 mm/year.

4.3. Regional Analysis of Landslide Dynamics

In the Shawan Gully, severe geometric distortions and lower monitoring sensitivity result in poor measurement quality for S1AP128, leading to a reduced number of effective deformation pixels. This suggests that this orbit is unsuitable for analyzing the displacement of the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides. Therefore, we combined the monitoring results from S1AP26 and S1DP62 to estimate the vertical and horizontal displacement components with Equation (8) (Figure 11).
The majority of the ground surface exhibits deformation velocities in the E-W and U-D directions that do not exceed ±10 mm/yr. However, the Nuole landslide displays significant activity signals. In the E-W direction, the NL2 region remains steady, whereas the lower and middle parts of the NL1 region exhibit strong activity (Figure 11a). The NL1 region is dominated by westward displacement. As shown in Figure 11c, the Ls2 region on the Nuole landslide exhibits the fastest westward deformation rate, reaching −170.43 mm/yr.
Furthermore, in the U-D direction, the Nuole landslide is primarily characterized by subsidence (Figure 11b). At the top of the NL2 region, the maximum subsidence velocity is −33.91 mm/yr, which gradually decreases along the downslope direction. The deformation pattern in the NL1 region demonstrates a steep gradient from the rear edge to the bottom of the landslide, characterized by a sequence of subsidence, stability, subsidence, uplift, and subsidence. This deformation characteristic is more evident in the analysis results of profile AA′ (Figure 11c). The fastest subsidence velocity of the rear edge is −96.75 mm/yr, decreasing to −4.31 mm/yr as it reaches Nuole Village. Moreover, along the downslope direction, after passing through the minor cracks Mc1 and Mc2, the subsidence velocity increases again to −69.72 mm/yr in the Ls2 region. The flat terrain below Ls2 allows the accumulation of loose materials, leading to uplift with a maximum velocity of 27.84 mm/yr. The fastest subsidence velocity is −104.42 mm/yr, as observed on the landslide scarp. In contrast, the Huajiaoshu landslide is relatively stable, with only minor displacements identified at the foot (Figure 11b,d).
Figure 11 illustrates that the local movement intensity within the NL1 area of the Nuole landslide varies, likely due to differences in terrain, landform, geological structure, and vegetation environment across different areas of the landslide body. Additionally, variations in slope gradient and aspect in local areas result in differing primary displacement directions (Figure 12). Specifically, the landslide body (area W-1) predominantly exhibits westward deformation in the E-W direction (Figure 12a,b). The northern slope of the landslide body, oriented approximately 40°, shows eastward movement (area E-2), which is opposite to the main body of the NL1 area. The landslide surface exhibits more complex local displacement characteristics in the vertical direction (Figure 12c,d). Nuole Village shows significant westward movement horizontally, but only slight subsidence vertically. The D-1 area, with slight westward movement horizontally, exhibits pronounced subsidence vertically, indicating that subsidence is the primary movement trend in this area. The D-2, D-3, and D-4 areas show significant displacement in both horizontal and vertical directions. The U-1 area at the toe is primarily characterized by uplift deformation, likely due to the accumulation of unstable materials from other regions, such as areas D-1 and D-2. The U-2, located below the Ls2 slope with relatively flat terrain, shows uplift as the main vertical movement trend.

4.4. Rainfall-Induced Changes in Landslide Activity

As shown in Figure 13, landslide failures are typically preceded by a long-term creeping process that involves three stages: deceleration (primary creep), steady state (secondary creep), and acceleration (tertiary creep) [67,68]. Landslide displacement reflects the dynamic balance between destabilizing and stabilizing forces [69]. Linear and sublinear creep are two common manifestations of a landslide during the stable creep stage. Sublinear creep may indicate progressive damage accumulation before catastrophic failure. Landslides in the accelerated creep stage are subjected to increasing shear forces, manifesting as persistently growing displacements. Under external factors such as rainfall, seismic activity, or anthropogenic disturbances, the slope may become unstable and develop into a landslide or even more severe hazards [70,71].
Multi-orbital InSAR measurements identified the Nuole landslide as the most active slope within the Shawan Gully, particularly below the Ls2 region. We selected deformation pixels P1 and P2 on the Nuole landslide from S1AP26 and S1DP62 measurements (Figure 14a,c). The maximum LOS deformation velocities of P1 and P2 reached 116.54 mm/yr and −139.82 mm/yr, respectively, with cumulative displacements of 957.21 mm and −1103.33 mm. To analyze the impact of rainfall on landslide activity and assess the movement trend of the Nuole landslide, we calculated the relative displacement variation (RDV) between adjacent acquisition times for pixels P1 and P2 as follows:
R D V = D i s p T o t a l N + 1 D i s p T o t a l N
where D i s p T o t a l N represents the cumulative surface displacement at time N relative to the initial acquisition. A larger RDV value indicates a higher acceleration and stronger slope activity, and the occurrence of multiple successive high RDV values may signal that the landslide progressed to an accelerated creeping stage.
As shown in Figure 14b,d, the Nuole landslide is generally in a quasi-linear and steady creeping stage, with no significant signs of acceleration or deceleration. During the non-rainy season (November to March), RDV values for P1 and P2 remained mostly between −5 and 5 mm, indicating weak slope activity. However, during the rainfall-intensive period from April to October, RDV values showed noticeable fluctuations. Intense or prolonged rainfall disrupted the previously stable state, with RDV values generally exceeding ±10 mm and reaching a maximum of −23.8 mm. After the rainy season, RDV fluctuations diminished, and the landslide returned to a steady creeping state with quasi-linear or sublinear displacements.
The results indicate a high sensitivity of the Nuole landslide to rainfall-induced instability. Rainfall changes the original movement trend of the Nuole landslide and intensifies its activity behavior in the short term. The RDV metric proves to be a useful indicator for capturing short-term deformation accelerations, offering practical value for early warning and risk mitigation in rainfall-sensitive mountainous regions.

5. Discussion

Prior to the SBAS-InSAR processing, we completed a suitability assessment of the InSAR monitoring scheme for involved datasets. According to the results, we masked areas prone to layover and shadow as well as regions with zero monitoring sensitivity from the SLC images. Meanwhile, we reprocessed the SAR images of S1AP26 using traditional SBAS-InSAR without masking. Figure 15 evaluates the processing results of the two SBAS-InSAR through RMSE, Vprecision, 1/ADI, and Velocity, analyzing the impact of the suitability assessment on InSAR measurement accuracy. The results indicate that the proposed suitability assessment method significantly improves data quality and measurement accuracy, specifically demonstrated as follows:
(1)
RMSE: This metric evaluates the phase quality of the interferograms, where a lower RMSE value indicates smaller phase errors and higher quality. Post-masking, the average interferometric phase error decreased from 1.55 rad to 1.41 rad, with the standard deviation reducing from 0.33 to 0.25, signifying a notable reduction in phase error.
(2)
1/ADI: Higher 1/ADI values indicate better phase stability of the pixels and more reliable results. The masking process had minimal impact on the phase mean and standard deviation (1/ADI), with no significant difference observed before and after processing. This suggests that geometric distortions affect the magnitude of interferometric phase errors rather than the phase distribution itself. The result also indicates that reducing sources of phase error is crucial for improving InSAR monitoring quality.
(3)
Vprecision: This parameter assesses the precision of deformation measurements, with lower Vprecision values indicating higher measurement accuracy. After masking, the mean Vprecision value decreased from 1.45 mm/year to 1.18 mm/year, and the standard deviation dropped from 0.33 mm to 0.30 mm, demonstrating that masking reduces error and uncertainty, thereby enhancing the precision of deformation rate measurements.
(4)
Velocity: Masking reduced the variability in average rate measurements, with the standard deviation of mean velocity dropping from 13.38 mm/yr to 12.85 mm/yr, indicating more concentrated and stable measurement results.
In summary, the masking process based on applicability assessment results not only reduces phase error and enhances velocity measurement accuracy, but also stabilizes and makes the data more consistent. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct necessary suitability assessments before further InSAR processing to improve the precision and reliability.

6. Conclusions

Shawan Gully is a large landslide-induced debris flow valley. The Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides are two high-elevation landslides within this valley, serving as primary sources of debris flow. We used SBAS-InSAR and multi-orbit Sentinel-1 SAR imagery to monitor surface deformation in the Shawan Gully, with a focus on analyzing the displacement and activity of the Nuole landslide. The main conclusions are the following:
  • This study used 688 Sentinel-1 SAR scenes collected from three orbits: S1AP26, S1AP128, and S1DP62. Before SBAS-InSAR processing, we proposed a method to evaluate the suitability of the InSAR monitoring scheme based on geometric distortions and monitoring sensitivity. The results show that the SAR imagery from Sentinel-1 ascending path 128 is severely affected by layover and shadow, making it unsuitable for refined monitoring of the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides. Among the remaining two orbits, the descending path 62 provides higher reliability for surface deformation monitoring.
  • After thinning the ground surface extent, we used SBAS-InSAR to process the refined SAR datasets. To eliminate residual fringes caused by topographical effects, we utilized PS-GCPs with stable phase and high coherence to refine the satellite orbit and re-flatten the interferograms. The refined SBAS-InSAR results of multi-orbits indicate significant surface deformation at the rear scarp and toe of the NL1 section on the Nuole landslide. Additionally, deformation features were observed in the BT2 collapse area, the NL2 section of the Nuole landslide, and the toe of the Huajiaoshu landslide using descending orbit 62 data. For detailed deformation monitoring and analysis of movement characteristics in different regions of the landslide, we estimated the surface deformation rates in both vertical and horizontal directions. The results show significant displacement in the NL1 area in both directions, with consistent movement in the main body of the landslide, while the northern scarp and the foot of the slope exhibited different movement characteristics. Time series displacement demonstrated that rainfall effectively triggers landslide instability and changes the slopes’ movement states, making it a significant factor influencing landslide activity.
  • We discussed the role of suitability assessment in enhancing InSAR monitoring accuracy through RMSE, Vprecision, 1/ADI, and Velocity. The mean and standard deviation of RMSE and Vprecision decreased, indicating improved deformation measurement accuracy. The standard deviation of mean deformation velocity decreased from 13.3788 mm/yr to 12.8514 mm/yr, indicating more stable and consistent measurement results. This also confirms that reducing error sources is an effective way to improve InSAR monitoring accuracy. Future research could explore the applicability of these methods in larger and more diverse study areas and investigate other factors that may influence InSAR monitoring accuracy to further enhance the quality and reliability of surface deformation monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z.; methodology, J.Z. and X.Z.; software, J.Z. and X.L.; investigation, Y.L. and X.L.; validation, J.Z. and X.Z.; formal analysis: J.Z., Y.L., and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z., X.Z. and D.Z.; supervision, X.Z. and D.Z.; funding acquisition, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42161067, and No. 42471483).

Data Availability Statement

The Sentinel-1 datasets used in this study were provided by Copernicus and ESA. The GACOS data are openly available from http://www.gacos.net/. The DEM and rainfall data are not publicly available for the moment due to the sensitive nature of the research.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the European Space Agency (ESA) for providing the sentinel-1 radar satellite data. The authors thank GoogleTM Earth for providing high-resolution optical images for interpretation and validation. The authors thank the Yunnan Remote Sensing Centre for providing high-resolution DEM. The authors thank the Chinese Academy of Sciences for providing rainfall records. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Froude, M.J.; Petley, D.N. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 18, 2161–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, S.; Qiu, H.; Hu, S.; Yang, D.; Liu, Z. Characteristics and geomorphology change detection analysis of the Jiangdingya landslide on July 12, 2018, China. Landslides 2021, 18, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Davies, T.; Bloomberg, M.; Palmer, D.; Robinson, T. Debris-flow risk-to-life: Preliminary screening. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024, 100, 104158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, Y.; Meng, X.; Qi, T.; Chen, G.; Li, Y.; Yue, D.; Qing, F. Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Debris Flows and Analysis of the Controlling Factors: A Machine Learning Approach. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Broeckx, J.; Rossi, M.; Lijnen, K.; Campforts, B.; Poesen, J.; Vanmaercke, M. Landslide mobilization rates: A global analysis and model. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020, 201, 102972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, W.; Qiu, H.; Wang, L.; Pei, Y.; Tang, B.; Ma, S.; Yang, D.; Cao, M. Combining rainfall-induced shallow landslides and subsequent debris flows for hazard chain prediction. CATENA 2022, 213, 106199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chong, Y.; Chen, G.; Meng, X.; Bian, S.; Huang, F.; Lin, L.; Yue, D.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, F. Formation mechanism and quantitative risk analysis of the landslide-induced hazard chain by an integrated approach for emergency management: A case study in the Bailong River basin, China. CATENA 2023, 233, 107522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, X.; Yang, F.; Hu, K.; Ding, M.; Liu, S.; Wei, L. Estimating the debris-flow magnitude using landslide sediment connectivity, Qipan catchment, Wenchuan County, China. CATENA 2023, 220, 106689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chong, Y.; Chen, G.; Meng, X.; Yang, Y.; Shi, W.; Bian, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yue, D. Quantitative analysis of artificial dam failure effects on debris flows—A case study of the Zhouqu ‘8.8’ debris flow in northwestern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 792, 148439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meng, X. Landslides & Debris Flows in Southern Gansu, China and Formation of the Catastrophic Zhouqu Debris Flow Disaster in August 2010. Quat. Int. 2012, 279–280, 322–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsuchida, T.; Moriwaki, T.; Nakai, S.; Athapaththu, A.M.R.G. Investigation and consideration on landslide zoning of multiple slope failures and debris flows of 2014 disaster in Hiroshima, Japan. Soils Found. 2019, 59, 1085–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, F.; Wu, Y.-H.; Yang, H.; Tanida, Y.; Kamei, A. Preliminary investigation of the 20 August 2014 debris flows triggered by a severe rainstorm in Hiroshima City, Japan. Geoenviron. Disasters 2015, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carlà, T.; Intrieri, E.; Raspini, F.; Bardi, F.; Farina, P.; Ferretti, A.; Colombo, D.; Novali, F.; Casagli, N. Perspectives on the prediction of catastrophic slope failures from satellite InSAR. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.M.; Yin, J.; Luo, M.H.; Ren, H.F.; Li, J.; Wang, L.Z.; Li, D.D.; Li, G.J. Active High-elevation Landslides in Mao County: Early Identification and Deformational Rules. J. Earth Sci. 2023, 34, 1596–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, C.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ding, P.; Liu, J. A graph deep learning method for landslide displacement prediction based on global navigation satellite system positioning. Geosci. Front. 2024, 15, 101690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, Z.; Peng, Y.; Li, W.; Yu, J.; Ge, D.; Han, L.; Xiang, W. An Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network for Old Landslide Detection Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2023, 61, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, F.; Wang, B. Debris flow susceptibility mapping in mountainous area based on multi-source data fusion and CNN model—Taking Nujiang Prefecture, China as an example. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2022, 15, 1966–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, S.; Li, D.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Sun, Y.; She, X. Landslide Identification in Human-Modified Alpine and Canyon Area of the Niulan River Basin Based on SBAS-InSAR and Optical Images. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.M.; Dijkstra, T.A.; Jordan, C.J.; Chen, G.; Zeng, R.Q.; Novellino, A. Forecasting the magnitude of potential landslides based on InSAR techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 241, 111738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Ding, C.; Li, W.; Luo, H.; Liao, M.; Xu, Q. Retrieval of historical surface displacements of the Baige landslide from time-series SAR observations for retrospective analysis of the collapse event. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 240, 111695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sigmundsson, F.; Hooper, A.; Hreinsdottir, S.; Vogfjord, K.S.; Ofeigsson, B.G.; Heimisson, E.R.; Dumont, S.; Parks, M.; Spaans, K.; Gudmundsson, G.B.; et al. Segmented lateral dyke growth in a rifting event at Bardarbunga volcanic system, Iceland. Nature 2015, 517, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Biggs, J.; Wright, T.J. How satellite InSAR has grown from opportunistic science to routine monitoring over the last decade. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bekaert, D.P.S.; Handwerger, A.L.; Agram, P.; Kirschbaum, D.B. InSAR-based detection method for mapping and monitoring slow-moving landslides in remote regions with steep and mountainous terrain: An application to Nepal. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 249, 111983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, Z.; Xiao, R.; Jiang, M.; Ferreira, V.G. Characterizing the spatial structure and aliasing effect of ocean tide loading on InSAR measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 2024, 311, 114297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shigemitsu, Y.; Ishitsuka, K.; Lin, W. Changes in widespread aquifer properties caused by a magnitude 6-class earthquake evaluated using InSAR analyses. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 122, 103394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, J.; Zhang, L.; Tang, M.; Liao, M.; Xu, Q.; Gong, J.; Ao, M. Mapping landslide surface displacements with time series SAR interferometry by combining persistent and distributed scatterers: A case study of Jiaju landslide in Danba, China. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 205, 180–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, Z.; Yuan, X.; Gan, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. A research on a new mapping method for landslide susceptibility based on SBAS-InSAR technology. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2023, 26, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, J.; Li, Z.; Song, C.; Zhu, W.; Tomás, R. Coupling effect of impoundment and irrigation on landslide movement in Maoergai Reservoir area revealed by multi-platform InSAR observations. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2024, 129, 103802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rosi, A.; Tofani, V.; Tanteri, L.; Stefanelli, C.T.; Agostini, A.; Catani, F.; Casagli, N. The new landslide inventory of Tuscany (Italy) updated with PS-InSAR: Geomorphological features and landslide distribution. Landslides 2018, 15, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y.F.; Zuo, X.Q.; Zhu, D.M.; Wu, W.H.; Yang, X.; Guo, S.P.; Shi, C.; Huang, C.; Li, F.; Liu, X.Y. Identification and Analysis of Landslides in the Ahai Reservoir Area of the Jinsha River Basin Using a Combination of DS-InSAR, Optical Images, and Field Surveys. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 6274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cai, J.; Zhang, L.; Dong, J.; Dong, X.; Li, M.; Xu, Q.; Liao, M. Detection and characterization of slow-moving landslides in the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake area by combining satellite SAR observations and airborne Lidar DSM. Eng. Geol. 2022, 305, 106730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seppi, S.A.; López-Martinez, C.; Joseau, M.J. Assessment of L-Band SAOCOM InSAR Coherence and Its Comparison with C-Band: A Case Study over Managed Forests in Argentina. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, L.; Tang, X.; Tomás, R.; Li, T.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Yao, J.; Lu, J. Monitoring surface deformation dynamics in the mining subsidence area using LT-1 InSAR interferometry: A case study of Datong, China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2024, 131, 103936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Feng, S.; Dai, K.; Sun, T.; Deng, J.; Tang, G.; Han, Y.; Ren, W.; Sang, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, H. Mini-Satellite Fucheng 1 SAR: Interferometry to Monitor Mining-Induced Subsidence and Comparative Analysis with Sentinel-1. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dun, J.; Feng, W.; Yi, X.; Zhang, G.; Wu, M. Detection and Mapping of Active Landslides before Impoundment in the Baihetan Reservoir Area (China) Based on the Time-Series InSAR Method. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cigna, F.; Bateson, L.B.; Jordan, C.J.; Dashwood, C. Simulating SAR geometric distortions and predicting Persistent Scatterer densities for ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT C-band SAR and InSAR applications: Nationwide feasibility assessment to monitor the landmass of Great Britain with SAR imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 152, 441–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, R.; Li, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Yuan, L. Identification and monitoring landslides in Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region with InSAR fusion integrated visibility analysis. Landslides 2020, 18, 551–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cook, M.E.; Brook, M.S.; Hamling, I.J.; Cave, M.; Tunnicliffe, J.F.; Holley, R. Investigating slow-moving shallow soil landslides using Sentinel-1 InSAR data in Gisborne, New Zealand. Landslides 2023, 20, 427–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xiong, Z.; Feng, G.; Feng, Z.; Miao, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Luo, S. Pre- and post-failure spatial-temporal deformation pattern of the Baige landslide retrieved from multiple radar and optical satellite images. Eng. Geol. 2020, 279, 105880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dai, K.R.; Deng, J.; Xu, Q.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, X.L.; Hancock, C.; Wen, N.L.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhuo, G.C. Interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the InSAR line of sight displacements in landslide measurements. GISci. Remote Sens. 2022, 59, 1226–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.; Zhao, C.; Yin, Y.; Tomás, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Wang, M.; Lopez-Sanchez, J.M. Refined InSAR method for mapping and classification of active landslides in a high mountain region: Deqin County, southern Tibet Plateau, China. Remote Sens. Environ. 2024, 304, 114030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qu, W.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, Q.; Hao, M. Sentinel-1 InSAR observations of co- and post-seismic deformation mechanisms of the 2016 Mw 5.9 Menyuan Earthquake, Northwestern China. Adv. Space Res. 2021, 68, 1301–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Li, W. Spatial distribution of large-scale landslides induced by the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake. J. Mt. Sci. 2011, 8, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, X.; Jiang, Y.; Shan, X.; Qu, C. Deriving 3D coseismic deformation field by combining GPS and InSAR data based on the elastic dislocation model. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2017, 57, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, X.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Y.; Lu, Z.; Samsonov, S.; Yang, C.; Wang, M.; Tomás, R. Three-dimensional and long-term landslide displacement estimation by fusing C- and L-band SAR observations: A case study in Gongjue County, Tibet, China. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 267, 112745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Feng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, P.; Xi, M.; Tong, X. Automatic selection of permanent scatterers-based GCPs for refinement and reflattening in InSAR DEM generation. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2022, 15, 954–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, S.; Wang, J.; Li, P. The Forming Condition and Developing Tendency of Debris-flow in Shawan Gully. J. Geol. Hazards Environ. Preserv. 2001, 02, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, F.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Yuan, L.; Cheng, R.; Mao, J. Research on the development characteristics of landslide-type debris flow in Shawandagou based on MT-InSAR. Prog. Geophys. 2023, 38, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, S. Risk Assessment of Debris Flow in Jinyuan Township, Tangdian District, Yunnan Province. Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China, 2017; pp. 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  50. Colesanti, C.; Wasowski, J. Investigating landslides with space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry. Eng. Geol. 2006, 88, 173–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, F.; An, Y.; Ren, C.; Xu, J.; Li, J.; Li, D.; Peng, Z. Monitoring and analysis of surface deformation in alpine valley areas based on multidimensional InSAR technology. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 12896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shi, C.; Zuo, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, D.; Li, Y.; Bu, J. Accuracy Assessment of Geometric-Distortion Identification Methods for Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery in Highland Mountainous Regions. Sensors 2024, 24, 2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ren, T.H.; Gong, W.P.; Bowa, V.M.; Tang, H.M.; Chen, J.; Zhao, F.M. An Improved R-Index Model for Terrain Visibility Analysis for Landslide Monitoring with InSAR. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kropatsch, W.G.; Strobl, D. The generation of SAR layover and shadow maps from digital elevation models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1990, 28, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Notti, D.; Herrera, G.; Bianchini, S.; Meisina, C.; García-Davalillo, J.C.; Zucca, F. A methodology for improving landslide PSI data analysis. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2014, 35, 2186–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, L.; Pei, P.; Zhang, X.; Qi, J.; Cai, J.; Cao, W.; Ding, R.; Mao, Y. Sensitivity Evaluation of Time Series InSAR Monitoring Results for Landslide Detection. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xiong, Z.; Zhang, M.; Ma, J.; Xing, G.; Feng, G.; An, Q. InSAR-based landslide detection method with the assistance of C-index. Landslides 2023, 20, 2709–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, C.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; de la Fuente, J. Large-area landslide detection and monitoring with ALOS/PALSAR imagery data over Northern California and Southern Oregon, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chang, F.; Dong, S.; Yin, H.; Wu, Z. Using the SBAS InSAR technique to monitor surface deformation in the Kuqa fold-thrust belt, Tarim Basin, NW China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2022, 231, 105212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jiang, M.; Ding, X.; Li, Z. Hybrid Approach for Unbiased Coherence Estimation for Multitemporal InSAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 2459–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deng, Y.K.; Tian, W.M.; Xiao, T.; Hu, C.; Yang, H. High-Quality Pixel Selection Applied for Natural Scenes in GB-SAR Interferometry. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Samsonov, S.; d’Oreye, N.; Smets, B. Ground deformation associated with post-mining activity at the French–German border revealed by novel InSAR time series method. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2013, 23, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shi, X.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, K.; Dong, J.; Jiang, H.; Liao, M. Surface displacements of the Heifangtai terrace in Northwest China measured by X and C-band InSAR observations. Eng. Geol. 2019, 259, 105181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, M.; Zhang, L.; Yang, M.; Liao, M. Complex surface displacements of the Nanyu landslide in Zhouqu, China revealed by multi-platform InSAR observations. Eng. Geol. 2023, 317, 107069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tang, W.; Gong, Z.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.a.; Motagh, M.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Malinowska, A.; Jiang, J.; Wei, L.; et al. Three-dimensional surface deformation from multi-track InSAR and oil reservoir characterization: A case study in the Liaohe Oilfield, northeast China. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2024, 174, 105637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, X.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C.; Zhu, W. Heifangtai loess landslide type and failure mode analysis with ascending and descending Spot-mode TerraSAR-X datasets. Landslides 2020, 17, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Albano, M.; Saroli, M.; Beccaro, L.; Moro, M.; Doumaz, F.; Discenza, M.E.; Del Rio, L.; Rompato, M. Multi-source data analysis to assess the past and present kinematics of the Pisciotta Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation (southern Italy). Remote Sens. Environ. 2023, 296, 113751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, S.; Wu, W.; Wang, J.; Yin, Z.; Cui, D.; Xiang, W. Residual-state creep of clastic soil in a reactivated slow-moving landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Landslides 2018, 15, 2413–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Wu, W.; Cui, D.; Su, A.; Xiang, W. Creep properties of clastic soil in a reactivated slow-moving landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Eng. Geol. 2020, 267, 105493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pedrazzini, A.; Jaboyedoff, M.; Loye, A.; Derron, M.-H. From deep seated slope deformation to rock avalanche: Destabilization and transportation models of the Sierre landslide (Switzerland). Tectonophysics 2013, 605, 149–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chigira, M.; Tsou, C.-Y.; Matsushi, Y.; Hiraishi, N.; Matsuzawa, M. Topographic precursors and geological structures of deep-seated catastrophic landslides caused by Typhoon Talas. Geomorphology 2013, 201, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Overview of the Shawan Gully and involved SAR images’ spatial extent; (b) typical geological hazards within Shawan Gully. (c) Overview of the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides. (d) Huajiaoshu landslide (HJS). (e) Nuole landslide (NL). In (d) and (e), The red lines indicate the approximate extent of the landslide and the white arrows indicate the direction in which the landslide may occur. Panels (d,e) were adapted from the Master’s thesis by Wang (2017) [49].
Figure 1. (a) Overview of the Shawan Gully and involved SAR images’ spatial extent; (b) typical geological hazards within Shawan Gully. (c) Overview of the Nuole and Huajiaoshu landslides. (d) Huajiaoshu landslide (HJS). (e) Nuole landslide (NL). In (d) and (e), The red lines indicate the approximate extent of the landslide and the white arrows indicate the direction in which the landslide may occur. Panels (d,e) were adapted from the Master’s thesis by Wang (2017) [49].
Remotesensing 17 01580 g001
Figure 2. Spatial–temporal baselines of different orbital SAR datasets. (a,b) Ascending orbits 26 and 128; (c) descending orbit 62. The green dots represent SAR images, the yellow dots represent the master image, and the grey lines indicate interferometric pairs.
Figure 2. Spatial–temporal baselines of different orbital SAR datasets. (a,b) Ascending orbits 26 and 128; (c) descending orbit 62. The green dots represent SAR images, the yellow dots represent the master image, and the grey lines indicate interferometric pairs.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g002
Figure 3. A technical scheme of the study.
Figure 3. A technical scheme of the study.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g003
Figure 4. Geometric distortions classifications. The gray line represents irregular terrain, and the black dashed lines indicate the propagation range of the radar waves. Segment b–a: foreshortening or layover. Segment a–c: flattening effect. Segments c–d: good visibility. Segment d–e: shadow.
Figure 4. Geometric distortions classifications. The gray line represents irregular terrain, and the black dashed lines indicate the propagation range of the radar waves. Segment b–a: foreshortening or layover. Segment a–c: flattening effect. Segments c–d: good visibility. Segment d–e: shadow.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g004
Figure 5. Spatial relationship between slope deformation in LOS and actual directions. The red dashed arrow represents the LOS displacement, whereas the blue solid arrow represents the actual displacement on the slope. k is the angle between vectors u and γ . α: slope aspect. θ: incidence angle. β: slope gradient. φ: flight heading angle.
Figure 5. Spatial relationship between slope deformation in LOS and actual directions. The red dashed arrow represents the LOS displacement, whereas the blue solid arrow represents the actual displacement on the slope. k is the angle between vectors u and γ . α: slope aspect. θ: incidence angle. β: slope gradient. φ: flight heading angle.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g005
Figure 6. Geometric distortion recognition of SAR Images in different orbits. (ac) Local incidence angle of the radar signal. (df) Geometric distortions in SAR images. (g) Quantitative statistics of geometric distortions across three tracks.
Figure 6. Geometric distortion recognition of SAR Images in different orbits. (ac) Local incidence angle of the radar signal. (df) Geometric distortions in SAR images. (g) Quantitative statistics of geometric distortions across three tracks.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g006
Figure 7. Sentinel-1 InSAR monitoring sensitivity model. Sensitivity values closer to 1 indicate higher monitoring sensitivity, values closer to 0 indicate lower monitoring sensitivity. The black arrows represent the satellite’s flight heading direction. Panels (ac) consider only the slope and aspect, whereas (df) include the influence of geometric distortions.
Figure 7. Sentinel-1 InSAR monitoring sensitivity model. Sensitivity values closer to 1 indicate higher monitoring sensitivity, values closer to 0 indicate lower monitoring sensitivity. The black arrows represent the satellite’s flight heading direction. Panels (ac) consider only the slope and aspect, whereas (df) include the influence of geometric distortions.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g007
Figure 8. InSAR monitoring sensitivity of the Sentinel-1 SAR datasets in Shawan Gully. (ac) Results of considering only the slope and aspect. (df) Influence of geometric distortions in InSAR monitoring sensitivity. (gi) Quantitative statistics of InSAR monitoring sensitivity.
Figure 8. InSAR monitoring sensitivity of the Sentinel-1 SAR datasets in Shawan Gully. (ac) Results of considering only the slope and aspect. (df) Influence of geometric distortions in InSAR monitoring sensitivity. (gi) Quantitative statistics of InSAR monitoring sensitivity.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g008
Figure 9. Identification and quality assessment of PS-GCPs. (ac) Distributions of PS-GCPs. (df) The terrain phase residuals of the PS-GCPs. (gi) The linear relationship between coherence and ADI.
Figure 9. Identification and quality assessment of PS-GCPs. (ac) Distributions of PS-GCPs. (df) The terrain phase residuals of the PS-GCPs. (gi) The linear relationship between coherence and ADI.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g009
Figure 10. Surface deformation velocity in LOS direction. (a) The invalid monitoring areas of S1AP128; (bd) LOS deformation monitoring results for S1AP26, S1AP128, and S1DP62, respectively.
Figure 10. Surface deformation velocity in LOS direction. (a) The invalid monitoring areas of S1AP128; (bd) LOS deformation monitoring results for S1AP26, S1AP128, and S1DP62, respectively.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g010
Figure 11. Surface deformation velocity in the vertical and east-west directions. (a,b) The east–west and vertical deformation velocity map, respectively. In panel (a), positive values indicate westward displacement, and negative values indicate eastward displacement. In panel (b), a positive value indicates uplift movement, while a negative value indicates subsidence movement. (c,d) Displacements in the two-dimensional directions of profiles AA′ and CC′ in panel (a,b). The meanings of Tc1, Mc1, Mc2, Mc4, Ls1, Ls2, and Ls4 remain consistent with the earlier explanation in the text (Section 2.1).
Figure 11. Surface deformation velocity in the vertical and east-west directions. (a,b) The east–west and vertical deformation velocity map, respectively. In panel (a), positive values indicate westward displacement, and negative values indicate eastward displacement. In panel (b), a positive value indicates uplift movement, while a negative value indicates subsidence movement. (c,d) Displacements in the two-dimensional directions of profiles AA′ and CC′ in panel (a,b). The meanings of Tc1, Mc1, Mc2, Mc4, Ls1, Ls2, and Ls4 remain consistent with the earlier explanation in the text (Section 2.1).
Remotesensing 17 01580 g011
Figure 12. Kinematic patterns on Nuole landslide’s NL1 region. Panels (a,b) depict the horizontal kinematic patterns, while panels (c,d) show vertical. The red dashed line and blue dashed line represent areas with significant displacement in the vertical and horizontal directions, respectively. The green dashed line indicates the location of Nuole Village.The white arrows indicate the primary movement direction. E-1 and E-2 represent areas of eastward displacement in the horizontal direction, while W-1 represents an area of westward displacement. Areas D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-4 are subsiding in the vertical direction, while U-1 and U-2 are uplifting. The meanings of Mc1, Mc2, Ls1, and Ls2 remain consistent with the earlier explanation in the text (Section 2.1).
Figure 12. Kinematic patterns on Nuole landslide’s NL1 region. Panels (a,b) depict the horizontal kinematic patterns, while panels (c,d) show vertical. The red dashed line and blue dashed line represent areas with significant displacement in the vertical and horizontal directions, respectively. The green dashed line indicates the location of Nuole Village.The white arrows indicate the primary movement direction. E-1 and E-2 represent areas of eastward displacement in the horizontal direction, while W-1 represents an area of westward displacement. Areas D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-4 are subsiding in the vertical direction, while U-1 and U-2 are uplifting. The meanings of Mc1, Mc2, Ls1, and Ls2 remain consistent with the earlier explanation in the text (Section 2.1).
Remotesensing 17 01580 g012
Figure 13. Three stages of slope creeping.
Figure 13. Three stages of slope creeping.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g013
Figure 14. Influence of precipitation on slope activity. Panel (a,c) is the surface deformation map derived from S1AP26 and S1DP62. Panel (a,c) shows the influence of rainfall on P1 and P2. In subfigure (b,d), the blue line represents the precipitation, the black line represents the cumulative displacement at points P1 and P2, and the red line represents the relative displacement variation (RDV) between adjacent time. A larger RDV indicates a higher deformation acceleration, suggesting greater instability of the landslide.
Figure 14. Influence of precipitation on slope activity. Panel (a,c) is the surface deformation map derived from S1AP26 and S1DP62. Panel (a,c) shows the influence of rainfall on P1 and P2. In subfigure (b,d), the blue line represents the precipitation, the black line represents the cumulative displacement at points P1 and P2, and the red line represents the relative displacement variation (RDV) between adjacent time. A larger RDV indicates a higher deformation acceleration, suggesting greater instability of the landslide.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g014
Figure 15. Impact of suitability assessment on the accuracy of surface deformation measurements in InSAR. (a) RMSE; (b) 1/ADI; (c) Vprecision; and (d) Velocity. the black rectangle represents the interquartile range (IQR), which covering the middle 50% of the data and providing an indication of the data's spread or variability. The white rectangle or dot represents the median, which is the middle value of the data set.
Figure 15. Impact of suitability assessment on the accuracy of surface deformation measurements in InSAR. (a) RMSE; (b) 1/ADI; (c) Vprecision; and (d) Velocity. the black rectangle represents the interquartile range (IQR), which covering the middle 50% of the data and providing an indication of the data's spread or variability. The white rectangle or dot represents the median, which is the middle value of the data set.
Remotesensing 17 01580 g015
Table 1. Basic parameters of the involved Sentinel-1 SAR datasets.
Table 1. Basic parameters of the involved Sentinel-1 SAR datasets.
Path2612862
Flight modeascendingascendingdescending
PolarizationVVVVVV
Heading angle (°)347.5028347.4863192.5084
Incidence angle (°)Local incidence angle (LIA)
Acquisition period19 October 2014
to 29 May 2023
26 November 2015
to 5 June 2023
9 October 2014
to 6 July 2023
Number223210255
Table 2. InSAR monitoring sensitivity classification.
Table 2. InSAR monitoring sensitivity classification.
Sensitivity[min, −0.5) and (0.5, 1] [−0.5, −0.3) and (0.3, 0.5][−0.3, −0.1) and (0.1, 0.3][−0.1, 0) and (0, 0.1]0
ClassificationHighMiddleLowExtremely lowinsensitivity
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Zuo, X.; Zhu, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, X. Long-Term Monitoring of Landslide Activity in a Debris Flow Gully Using SBAS-InSAR: A Case Study of Shawan Gully, China. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091580

AMA Style

Zhang J, Zuo X, Zhu D, Li Y, Liu X. Long-Term Monitoring of Landslide Activity in a Debris Flow Gully Using SBAS-InSAR: A Case Study of Shawan Gully, China. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(9):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jianming, Xiaoqing Zuo, Daming Zhu, Yongfa Li, and Xu Liu. 2025. "Long-Term Monitoring of Landslide Activity in a Debris Flow Gully Using SBAS-InSAR: A Case Study of Shawan Gully, China" Remote Sensing 17, no. 9: 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091580

APA Style

Zhang, J., Zuo, X., Zhu, D., Li, Y., & Liu, X. (2025). Long-Term Monitoring of Landslide Activity in a Debris Flow Gully Using SBAS-InSAR: A Case Study of Shawan Gully, China. Remote Sensing, 17(9), 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop