Next Article in Journal
Towards Operational Dam Monitoring with PS-InSAR and Electronic Corner Reflectors
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Accuracy and Trend Consistency of Hourly Surface Solar Radiation Datasets of ERA5, MERRA-2, SARAH-E, CERES, and Solcast over China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Actual and Reference Evapotranspiration Between Seasonally Frozen and Permafrost Soils on the Tibetan Plateau

1
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science and Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Naqu Plateau Climate and Environment Observation and Research Station of Tibet Autonomous Region, Naqu 852000, China
3
Cryosphere Research Station on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
5
College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(7), 1316; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071316
Submission received: 26 February 2025 / Revised: 30 March 2025 / Accepted: 5 April 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025

Abstract

:
A comparison of evapotranspiration between seasonally frozen and permafrost soils has important theoretical value for studying land surface processes and ecological environmental evolution on the Tibetan Plateau. In this work, the actual (ETa) and reference (ET0) evapotranspiration and crop coefficient (Kc) were calculated via eddy covariance data and meteorological gradient data from sites in the Naqu Prefecture and Tanggula Mountains. The variations, differences, and factors influencing the ETa and ET0 were analysed. The results revealed that at the two sites in 2008, the annual total ETa values were 493.53 and 585.17 mm, which accounted for 83.58% and 144.39% of the total annual rainfall, respectively. The ETa at the Naqu site was affected mainly by the Tibetan Plateau monsoon (TPM), whereas the ETa at the Tanggula site was strongly affected by both the TPM and the freezing–thawing processes of the permafrost. The annual total ET0 values at the two sites were 819.95 and 673.15 mm, respectively. The monthly total ET0 at the Naqu site was greater than that at the Tanggula site. The ETa and ET0 values at the two sites were low in winter–spring, high in summer–autumn, and concentrated from May to October. When snow was present, the ETa values at the Naqu site were relatively high, and the ET0 values at both sites were very small and even negative at the Naqu site. The ETa and ET0 values at the two sites were significantly positively correlated with the net radiation (Rn), surface temperature (T0), air temperature (Ta), water vapour pressure (e) and soil water content (smc), and negatively correlated with the wind speed (ws). The correlation between the ETa and the T0 at the Naqu site was the most significant, and the coefficient of partial correlation was 0.812; meanwhile, the correlation between the ETa and the smc at the Tanggula site was the most significant, and the coefficient of partial correlation was 0.791. The Rn at the Naqu and Tanggula sites both had greater impacts on the ET0.

1. Introduction

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a crucial component of the process of water and energy budgeting and is a climatic factor of equal importance to precipitation [1,2]. According to Chahine [3], 65% of rainfall over land comes from evaporation from land areas. Accurately determining the ET is crucial for research in agricultural and ecological environments and hydrology, e.g., managing water resources [4], optimising efficient water-saving irrigation in arid regions [5], reducing wastewater discharge into the environment [6], and determining the impact process and feedback mechanism of climate warming on water resources [7].
The Tibetan Plateau (TP) is known as the “Asian water tower” because of its abundant water. The ET process on the TP governs the variations between soil moisture and atmospheric humidity, directly influencing the regional circulation patterns of the Asian monsoon system [8,9], which is a crucial component of the global energy and water cycles [10]. Many scholars conducted research on the ET at various locations and underlying surface types on the TP in recent years [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, most of these studies focused on features at a single site or the whole TP, and few studies have compared the ET between seasonally frozen and permafrost soils across the TP. It is currently unclear whether differences in the ET and its drivers exist between permafrost and seasonally frozen soils [19].
The area of the TP is approximately 257 × 104 km2 [20]. Owing to the relatively high elevation and harsh and cold climatic conditions, 96% of the TP area is frozen soil, of which approximately 56% is seasonally frozen soil and approximately 40% is permafrost soil [21]. Therefore, seasonally frozen and permafrost soils are important components of the TP ecosystem. There are differences in the hydrothermal properties and physical processes between regions with seasonally frozen soil and permafrost [22,23,24], and these differences cause different ET processes. A previous study revealed that the ET values of ground surfaces that freeze and unfreeze greatly differ [25]. The ET processes over the TP are closely linked to the climate and hydrology, as well as other biological, physical, and chemical processes. These processes lead to climate change and atmospheric circulation at various scales, from local to global, and then provide direct or indirect feedback to the climate system [26,27,28]. Hence, comparing the ET between seasonally frozen and permafrost soils across the TP is extremely important for predicting climate change, understanding the ecological environment and conducting sustainable development research.
As technology has developed, the eddy covariance (EC) technique provides a direct method for measuring actual evapotranspiration (ETa) that is widely used worldwide, but these devices are expensive [29]. The reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is an important component of irrigated agriculture, is widely used to estimate crop water requirements, and can be obtained with only routine meteorological observation data [30]. The crop coefficient (Kc) can be used to determine the ETa without equipment for direct measurements [30].
In this work, EC data and meteorological gradient data from the Naqu (located in the seasonally frozen soil region) and Tanggula (located in the permafrost soil region) sites are used, and the ETa, ET0, and Kc at the two sites were estimated. The variations, differences, and factors influencing the ETa and ET0 between the seasonally frozen and permafrost soils across the TP were analysed, with a focus on the impacts of the Tibetan Plateau monsoon (TPM) and soil freezing–thawing processes. We aimed to provide a reference for studying ecological environmental protection and land surface processes on the TP. We hope to provide an accurate ground verification reference for satellite observations and model simulations.

2. Sites and Data

2.1. Sites

In this work, two monitoring sites were chosen: the Naqu site, which is in the Naqu Valley region of the TP, and the Tanggula site, which is located at the Tanggula Pass on the TP (see Figure 1).
The Naqu site is near Niaoqu village, Seni District, Naqu city, Tibet Autonomous Region (91.90°E, 31.37°N), and the elevation is 4509 m above sea level (a.s.l.). This site is located within a plateau subfrigid semihumid climate zone. The ground at the site is flat terrain with expansive surrounding topography and is characterised predominantly by alpine grasslands where the vegetation height is less than 20 cm.
The Tanggula site is located on the gentle slope of the Tanggula Mountain Pass near the Qinghai–Tibet Highway (91.94°E, 33.06°N), located in a plateau frigid semihumid climate zone, and the elevation is 5100 m a.s.l. The ground at the site had flat terrain with expansive surrounding topography, covered by alpine grasslands where the vegetation height is less than 10 cm.

2.2. Data

In this work, the two sites both contained an EC system that was used to calculate the ETa and a gradient meteorological tower that was used to calculate the ET0. The study period was the entire year of 2008. In this research, all the times were reported in Beijing time (BJT).
At the Naqu site, the EC system was positioned 20 m above the ground on a tower and composed of an LI-7500 open-path infrared gas analyser (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA), which measures H2O and CO2 densities and virtual temperature, and a DAT-600 ultrasonic anemometer (Kaijo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), which measures three-dimensional wind speed with a sampling frequency of 10 Hz. The data were collected via a CR5000 data logger (Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT, USA). The 10 m gradient meteorological tower was composed of four-component radiation (1.5 m), air temperature and relative humidity (1 and 8.2 m), wind speed (1, 5, and 10 m), wind direction (10 m), air pressure (0.5 m), precipitation (1 m), snow depth (3 m), soil moisture content (4 and 20 cm), soil temperature (0, 4, 10, 20, and 40 cm), and soil heat flux (10 and 20 cm) measurements.
At the Tanggula site, the EC system was located 3 m above the ground on a tripod and was composed of an LI-7500 open-path infrared gas analyser, which measures H2O and CO2 densities and virtual temperature, and a CSAT3 ultrasonic anemometer–thermometer (Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT, USA), which measures three-dimensional wind speed with a sampling frequency of 10 Hz. The data logger was also a CR5000 data collector. The 10 m gradient meteorological tower was composed of four-component radiation (2 m), air temperature and relative humidity and wind speed (2, 5, and 10 m), wind direction (10 m), precipitation (1 m), snow depth (2 m), soil temperature (2, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm), and soil moisture content and soil heat flux (5, 10, and 20 cm) measurements.

3. Methods

3.1. Calculating ETa

The ETa was calculated via the EC method as follows:
E T a = λ E s L v ρ
L v = 2.5 × 10 6 2323 T
where ETa represents the daily actual evapotranspiration (mm/day), λEs represents the daily latent heat flux (W/(m2∙day)), ρ represents the water density (kg/m3), Lv represents the latent heat of water (J/kg), and T represents the air temperature (°C).
The EC method has a solid theoretical basis and wide-ranging applications and is recognised as having a high accuracy. In this study, Edire software version 7.1 (Clement R., University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK) was used to process the EC data. Before the calculation of the data, quality control analysis of the EC data was carried out, which included a quality inspection of the raw EC data, spike detection and removal, and time lag correction. Moreover, the estimation of the latent heat flux (λE) necessitated a series of corrections, including sonic temperature correction, coordinate rotations, spectral correction in the high/low-frequency response, and the Webb–Pearman–Leuning correction [31].
For the missing EC observation data, ETa was calculated via the aerodynamic method to estimate λE using the 10-metre meteorological tower data as follows [32]:
L E = 0.622 L v ρ k 2 [ e a ( z 2 ) e a ( z 1 ) ] [ u ( z 1 ) u ( z 2 ) ] P [ ln ( z 2 d z 1 d ) ] 2 ( Φ M Φ V ) 1
where ρ is the air density (kg/m3), k = 0.4 is the von Karman constant, ea is the actual vapour pressure (hPa), u is the wind velocity (m/s), z1 = 2 m, z2 = 10 m, P is the air pressure (hPa), d is the zero displacement height (m), ΦM is the stability function for momentum, and ΦV is the stability function for water vapour transport.

3.2. Calculating ET0

The FAO56 Penman–Monteith equation is a widely used method for calculating ET0 and was proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations; this equation can use general meteorological data to calculate ET0. The reference surface is defined as “a hypothetical reference crop with an assumed crop height of 0.12 m, a fixed surface resistance of 70 s/m, and an albedo of 0.23” [33].
The ET0 was estimated via the FAO56 Penman–Monteith equation as follows [33]:
E T 0 = 0.408 Δ ( R n G ) + γ 900 T + 273 u 2 ( e s e a ) Δ + γ ( 1 + 0.34 u 2 )
where ET0 is the daily reference evapotranspiration (mm/day), Δ is the slope of the vapour pressure curve (kPa/°C), Rn is the daily net radiation flux at the crop surface (MJ/(m2∙day)), G is the daily soil heat flux (MJ/(m2∙day)), γ is the psychrometric constant (kPa/°C), T is the mean daily air temperature at a height of 2 m (°C), u2 is the wind speed at a height of 2 m (m/s), es is the saturation vapour pressure (kPa), and ea is the actual vapour pressure (kPa).
In this study, Δ is given by
Δ = 4098 [ 0.6108 exp ( 17.27 T T + 237.3 ) ] ( T + 237.3 ) 2
The Rn was calculated via four-component radiation data as follows:
Rn = SdSu + LdLu
where Su is the daily upwards shortwave radiation (MJ/(m2∙day)), Sd is the daily downwards shortwave radiation (MJ/(m2∙day)), Lu is the daily upwards longwave radiation (MJ/(m2∙day)), and Ld is the daily downwards longwave radiation (MJ/(m2∙day)).
The G was calculated according to the following equation [34]:
G C ¯ 0.01 × T 0 cm t + 0.06 × T 5 cm t + 0.03 × T 10 cm t + G 10 cm
where G represents the daily soil heat flux (MJ/(m2∙day)); C ¯ represents the average volume heat capacity (J/(m3∙K)); T0cm, T5cm, and T10cm represent the soil temperatures (K) at 0 cm, 5 cm, and 10 cm, respectively; and G10cm represents the soil heat flux (W/m2) at a depth of 10 cm.
γ is given by
γ = 0.665 × 10 3 P
es is given by
e s = e 0 ( T max ) + e 0 ( T min ) 2
e 0 ( T ) = 0.6108 exp ( 17.27 T T + 237.3 )
where e0(T) is the saturation vapour pressure (kPa) at air temperature T (°C).
ea is given by
e a = e 0 ( T max ) R H min 100 + e 0 ( T min ) R H max 100 2
where RHmax is the maximum relative humidity (%), and RHmin is the minimum relative humidity (%).

3.3. Calculating Kc

Kc is the ratio of ETa to ET0 [30]:
K c = E T a / E T 0

4. Results

4.1. Variations in Meteorological Elements

The Naqu site is located in the seasonally frozen soil region. In January and February, the shallow soil was frozen, and the maximum depth of the freezing soil layer was approximately 1.5 m [31], below which it was in a thawing state. At the beginning of March, the soil slowly thawed from bottom to top, and at the end of March, the soil thawed rapidly from top to bottom, which started a two-way thawing process until it completely thawed. The soil completely thawed from April to October (Figure 2a). In early November, the soil began to freeze from the top layer down to the bottom layer, and then the depth of the freezing soil layer gradually reached the maximum.
The Tanggula site is located in the permafrost soil region. From January to March, the soil was completely frozen. At the end of April, the active layer (AL) began to thaw from the surface, after which it gradually thawed, and the maximum thawing depth of the AL was greater than 3.0 m in September [31], below which it was permafrost soil. In early October, the AL began freezing upwards from the permafrost table. Approximately 10 additional days later, two-way freezing processes started, with the surface rapidly freezing downwards. In November and December, the soil was completely frozen again (Figure 2b). The daily average soil temperatures at the Tanggula site in August and September and at the Naqu site in July–September both exhibited pronounced declines due to heavy rainfall events during both periods. The large amount of cloud cover in the sky during the rainfall events reduced the Rn, which resulted in a significant decrease in the daily average soil temperature.
Figure 3a shows the variation in the daily mean air temperature (Ta) at 10 m at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008. From April to September, the monthly average Ta at the Naqu site was positive, and it was negative in the other months. From June to September, the monthly average Ta at the Tanggula site was positive, and it was negative in the other months. The annual average Ta values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were −1.34 and −5.80 °C, respectively. The annual instantaneous maximum Ta values were 20.13 and 14.16 °C, respectively, both of which occurred in July. The annual instantaneous minimum Ta values were −36.32 and −30.32 °C, respectively, which occurred after heavy snowfall in early February.
Figure 3b shows the variation in the daily average wind speed (ws) at the Naqu site at 1 m and at the Tanggula site at 2 m in 2008. The statistical results revealed that the monthly average ws of the two sites was less than 5.0 m/s, except in January and April. The annual average ws values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were 4.73 and 4.69 m/s, respectively, and the annual maximum instantaneous ws values were 36.83 and 21.18 m/s, respectively, which occurred in January and February, respectively.
The snow at the two sites was concentrated from January to March and from October to December (Figure 4). The statistical results revealed that the numbers of days with snow at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008 were 114 and 135 d, respectively; the maximum number of days with snow occurred in November; and the daily maximum snow depth at the Naqu site was lower than that at the Tanggula site.
A weighing rain gauge was used at both the Naqu and Tanggula sites (T200B, Geonor Inc., Akershus, Norway), and the rainfall was counted as the total rainfall (including snowfall). As shown in Figure 5, the rainfall at the two sites was concentrated during the TPM from May to October. The annual rainfall amount at the Naqu site was 590.50 mm, and the rainfall amount from May to October was 568.10 mm, which accounted for 96.21% of the annual rainfall amount. The annual rainfall amount at the Tanggula site was 405.27 mm, and the rainfall amount from May to October was 350.77 mm, which was 86.55% of the annual rainfall amount. This occurred because, on average, the Tibetan Plateau summer monsoon occurred in May, and the whole plateau was wet, “warm”, and rainy. The Tibetan Plateau winter monsoon was initiated in October on average, and the whole plateau was dry and cold and had less precipitation [35,36]. Using the relative coefficient of rainfall [37] combined with the rainfall characteristics of the two sites, it was determined that the rainy season at the Naqu site in 2008 started on 12 May and ended on 30 September. During the rainy season, the total rainfall amount was 512.00 mm, which was 86.71% of the total annual rainfall amount. At the Tanggula site, the rainy season started on 19 May and ended on 25 September. During the rainy season, the total rainfall amount was 286.27 mm, which was 70.64% of the total annual rainfall amount. The rainy season at the Naqu site started earlier and ended later than that at the Tanggula site. The rainfall at the Naqu site was greater than that at the Tanggula site.

4.2. Variations in ETa

In 2008, the variations in the ETa at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were similar, and both were concentrated from May to October (Figure 5). The annual total ETa values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were 493.53 and 585.17 mm, respectively, which accounted for 83.58% and 144.39% of the annual total rainfall, respectively, indicating that the capacity for evaporation at these two sites was very high. There were other sources of water for the ETa at Tanggula in addition to the rainfall caused by the TPM. Some studies have also reported that the annual total ETa is greater than the annual total rainfall at the Tuotuo River and on the northeastern TP [38,39].
ETa/rainfall is an important parameter for describing the water balance, which reflects the efficiency of the ecosystem utilisation of precipitation. The annual ETa/rainfall at the Naqu site was 0.84, which is similar to the value of alpine meadows (0.88) [40]. The annual ETa/rainfall at the Tanggula site was 1.44, which is close to the value of the degraded grassland in Inner Mongolia (1.4) [41]. This finding indicates that the grassland at the Tanggula site degraded, which reduced its ability to conserve sources of water.
The monthly total ETa at the Tanggula site was greater from January to September, and that at the Naqu site was greater from October to December (see Table 1) because both sites experienced deep snow from October to December. During this period, the Ta values at the Tanggula site were very low, all less than 0 °C, which resulted in minimal evaporation and sublimation from the snow surface. Moreover, the Ta at the Naqu site reached 7 °C in the daytime, which resulted in a high rate of evaporation, and sublimation from the snow surface led to a high level of ETa in Naqu. The maximum monthly total ETa at the Naqu site occurred in July, and that at the Tanggula site occurred in August. At this time, the Rn and Ta increased, which was also the time when the rainfall was the most concentrated. At the same time, the surface vegetation was in the peak growing season, transpiration was strong, and ETa reached a maximum. The minimum monthly total ETa of the two sites occurred in January and November. At this time, the Rn and Ta decreased, the amount of rainfall was very small, the surface vegetation dried out, and the ETa was very small.

4.3. Variations in ET0

The ET0 is the hypothetical evapotranspiration rate of the reference crop canopy [33]. The new definition of ET0 avoids many problems with the old definition, including connecting the ET0 with the reference grass, but the new definition maintains continuity with the old definition. The new parameter does not need special regional calibration or wind functions. The ET0 can be calculated via general meteorological data. This new parameter has high practical application value and accuracy. Recently, it has been widely applied worldwide [42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
As shown in Figure 6, the ET0 values at the two sites were small in spring but much greater than the ETa values. Subsequently, the ET0 gradually increased, reached a maximum in summer, gradually decreased in autumn, and reached its lowest value in winter. When there was snow cover at both sites, ET0 became very small, and there were even negative values at the Naqu site, which was due to the low Rn and Ta values when there was snow cover.
In 2008, the annual total ET0 values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were 819.95 mm and 673.15 mm, respectively. The monthly total ET0 at the Naqu site was greater than that at the Tanggula site (see Table 1), which was related to the method of calculating the ET0, and the equation was established from the theories of energy balance and aerodynamics. The equation uses e, Rn, ws, and the air-drying force under certain temperature conditions to determine ET0 [33]. e, Rn, and ws at the Naqu site were greater than those at the Tanggula site.

4.4. Variations in Kc

It is very important to determine the Kc value of an area. Some locations have only general meteorological data and no EC data. Therefore, we first calculated the ET0 via the FAO56 Penman–Monteith method and then calculated the ETa via the Kc values in the same or similar areas.
The daily Kc values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites varied between −3 and 3 in 2008 (Figure 7). The Kc values at the Tanggula site were greater than those at the Naqu site. In the period without snow cover, the Kc values for the two sites were between 0 and 2, which were greater in the rainy season and lower in the dry season. During the rainy season, the average Kc value at the Naqu site was 0.90, and that for the Tanggula site was 1.14. In the dry season, the average Kc value at the Naqu site was 0.18, and that at the Tanggula site was 0.37. In the period with snow cover, the changes in the Kc value at the Naqu and Tanggula sites had no obvious trend, and the average Kc values were 0.51 and 0.68, respectively. The annual average Kc values at the two sites were 0.60 and 0.87, respectively.

5. Discussion

The daily mean Ta of the two sites exhibited obvious seasonal variations with a parabolic shape, and it was affected mainly by solar radiation. The monthly average, monthly maximum, monthly minimum, and monthly range Ta values at the Naqu site were greater than those at the Tanggula site. The altitude and type of underlying surface of the frozen soil were the main factors influencing the Ta at the two sites. The higher altitude and permafrost underlying the surface at the Tanggula site resulted in a lower Ta. With increasing altitude, the annual average Ta decreased, and the variation in the average daily Ta range became more obvious [49]. In February and November to December, the Ta sharply decreased, which was due to the heavy snowfall at the two sites during this period. Snow on a surface led to an increase in the surface albedo, resulting in a decrease in Rn and a sharply decreased Ta [50]. In winter, the warming effect of snow has little effect on the seasonal thawing depth but has an obvious effect on reducing the seasonal freezing depth [51]. Therefore, the impacts of snow at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were different. From November to December, the Ta at the Tanggula site was lower than 0 °C, the snow-thawing speed was slow, and the change in the snow depth curve was also gradual. However, the Ta at the Naqu site in the daytime reached 7 °C, the snow-thawing speed was fast, and the slope of the snow depth curve changed steeply.
The instantaneous maximum ws at the Naqu site each month was greater than that at the Tanggula site. The variations in the ws at the two sites were similar. The ws values at the Naqu site showed a pronounced diurnal variation in winter, and at the Tanggula site, there was a pronounced variation in winter and spring. Specifically, the ws gradually increased in the morning; reached its maximum in the afternoon; and even exceeded 20 m/s because solar radiation warmed the surface during the day, which increased the atmospheric turbulence activity near the surface. Then, the ws gradually decreased and maintained a low ws at night. The diurnal variation in the ws in the other seasons was relatively stable.
The variations in the ETa and ET0 at the two sites were similar; both were small in winter–spring and large in summer–autumn. The ETa values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were concentrated from May to October. From January to April, the ETa values at the two sites were very small and even had small negative values because there was little rainfall; in addition, the Ta was low, the snow was not as thick as that from November to December, and condensation occurred. During this period, the ETa at the Tanggula site was greater than that at the Naqu site because of the deeper snow cover, the longer duration of snowmelt, the number of snow covers, and the snow depth at the Tanggula site were greater than those at the Naqu site. When the seasonally frozen soil at the Naqu site began to thaw at the end of March and the AL at the Tanggula site began to thaw at the end of April, the λE at these two sites increased, and the ETa increased accordingly. However, because the rainy season did not occur at either site and the surface and atmosphere were relatively dry, the change in ETa was not as drastic as that in the rainy season. After the rainy season, the ETa at both sites increased rapidly and was strongly affected by rainfall. After each increase in rainfall, the ETa peaked. During this period, the ETa at the Naqu site was 392.87 mm, which was 79.60% of the total annual ETa. The ETa at the Tanggula site was 408.00 mm, which was 69.72% of the total annual ETa. After the conclusion of the rainy season, the ETa at both sites decreased rapidly. Therefore, the ETa at both sites was obviously affected by the rainfall caused by the TPM.
However, in terms of the ETa at the Tanggula site, in addition to the influence of the TPM, the freezing–thawing processes of the AL also had a great impact. The AL at the Tanggula site began to thaw at the end of April. The surface soil of the AL thawed earlier than the bottom soil, which was still completely frozen. Therefore, the surface soil water content (smc) gradually increased, but the range in which the bottom soil changed was small. The AL then gradually thawed downwards. With increasing thawing depth in the AL, the water storage capacity gradually increased. In September, the thawing depth of the AL reached a maximum, where it exceeded 3 m. During the thawing process of the AL, the infiltrating water was blocked by the permafrost and accumulated in the shallow soil. The smc of each layer in the AL was basically saturated; thus, the soil had sufficient water for evaporation. The water content of the AL during the thawing period was one component of the water source of the ETa. Therefore, the ETa at the Naqu site was affected mainly by the TPM, whereas the ETa at the Tanggula site was strongly affected by both the TPM and the freezing–thawing processes of the permafrost.
Meteorological conditions and surface conditions both affect the ETa and ET0. Meteorological conditions include the radiation, Ta, air humidity, rainfall, ws, etc. The surface conditions include the surface temperature (T0), smc, vegetation status, and snow cover [33]. Here, the rainfall and vegetation conditions were not considered, and the snow weather was excluded. Only the relationships between the daily data of the ETa and the Rn, Ta, ws, water vapour pressure (e), T0, and smc at the Naqu and Tanggula sites that lacked snow were analysed. To avoid the influence of multicollinearity between the various factors, a partial correlation analysis was adopted. The analytical results (see Table 2) revealed that the ETa and ET0 both exhibited significant positive correlations with the other meteorological elements, except the ws. The correlation between the ETa and the T0 at the Naqu site was the most significant, whereas the correlation between the ETa and the smc at the Tanggula site was the most significant. The correlation between the ET0 and the Rn at both sites was the most significant, which was related to the method of calculating the ET0. This finding is related to the conditions of the underlying surfaces of the two sites. Compared with the Tanggula site, the Naqu site is located in the seasonally frozen soil region, with a greater T0 and lush vegetation. The increase in the T0 directly affected the soil evaporation and plant transpiration. However, the Tanggula site is located in the permafrost soil region, with a lower T0 and sparse vegetation. The increase in the T0 was partly used for soil melting and heat dissipation, so the impact of the increase in the T0 on the ETa was not as sensitive as that at the Naqu site. This also resulted in a stronger relationship between the ETa and the smc at the Tanggula site.
There are two ways in which the ws influences evaporation. On the one hand, due to wind energy, turbulent diffusion strengthens, so water vapour diffusion on the evaporation surface strengthens and enhances evaporation. On the other hand, the wind can strengthen advection. If this advection is cold and wet, it inhibits evaporation [52]. The annual average Ta values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites were very low at −1.34 and −5.80 °C, respectively. The cold and wet advection caused by the glacial winds on the plateau was very strong; thus, ws was negatively correlated with the ETa.
The ET0 was relative to a certain reference plane and could not represent the ETa. Owing to different vegetation or crop types and reference plane conditions, the ETa and ET0 greatly differed. The comparison between the ETa and ET0 at the two sites is shown in Figure 8. The ET0 values of the two sites were approximately 25% and 9% higher than the ETa values, respectively. This occurred because for the Naqu site located in the seasonally frozen soil region, compared with the Tanggula site, the ET0 itself was greater because of the greater Ta and Rn, and the ETa was significantly lower than the ET0 due to water limitations. Similar results were found in the seasonally frozen soil region in Northeast China, especially in dry years [53]. However, the Tanggula site located in the permafrost soil region, the ET0 itself was relatively small because of the lower Ta. At the same time, the surface soil thawed in summer, which formed an AL with a relatively sufficient water supply. The vegetation had more available water. Therefore, the ETa was close to the ET0. Other researchers reported that in the Arctic and northeastern TP, especially in wetland and tundra regions, the ETa was also close to the ET0 [54,55].
The Kc value can be used to estimate the ETa. The monthly average Kc values were greater at the Tanggula site from January to October and greater at the Naqu site in November and December (see Table 3). Under the given radiation conditions, the ETa and ET0 were equal when the water supply was sufficient, which defined it as a humid environment [56]. During the rainy season, the monthly average Kc value at the Tanggula site from June to September was slightly larger than 1.0, and that at the Naqu site in July and August was also close to 1.0. The Kc value was greater than 1.0; that is, the ETa was greater than the ET0, so it should be in a humid environment. When the Kc value was greater than 1.0, it indicates that there was almost always precipitation at both sites or continuous precipitation had just occurred. That is, there was sufficient water vapour in the air for evaporation.

6. Conclusions

In this work, the ETa, ET0, and Kc were calculated by using EC data and meteorological gradient data from the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008. The variations, differences, and factors influencing the ETa and ET0 were analysed. In conclusion, an in-depth and detailed analysis of the changes in and differences in evapotranspiration was performed with observation data from different frozen soil regions on the TP. This work not only deepened the understanding of the process of the water–heat coupling in different frozen soil regions but also provided high-precision and accurate calibration and validation data for satellite observations and model simulations.
In our next work, we will use remote sensing models and satellite remote sensing data to analyse the changes in evapotranspiration at different spatial and temporal scales. In the future work, we will downscale the driving data to the resolution of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) or Landsat data and extract physical quantities, such as the surface temperature, from the MODIS or Landsat data. This will provide the driving data required for the remote sensing model through remote sensing data for pattern calculation and analysis.

Author Contributions

L.G.: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. J.Y.: conceptualisation, resources, supervision, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Z.H.: conceptualisation, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing. Y.M.: conceptualisation, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing. H.Y.: validation and writing—review and editing. F.S.: formal analysis and investigation. S.W.: data curation and software. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42475102, 42330609, U2442207), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association (No. 2021427) and West Light Foundation (No. xbzg-zdsys-202409) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Science and Technology Projects of Xizang Autonomous Region of China (No. XZ202501JD0022), the Key Talent Projects in Gansu Province, the Central Guidance Fund for Local Science and Technology Development Projects in Gansu Province (No. 24ZYQA031), and the Program of the State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science and Frozen Soil Engineering of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. CSFSE-ZZ-2401).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Thornthwait, C.W.; Mather, J.R. The role of evapotranspiration in climate. Arch. Met. Geoph. Biokl. Ser. B 1951, 3, 16–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kite, G.W.; Droogers, P. Comparing evapotranspiration estimates from satellites, hydrological models and field data. J. Hydrol. 2000, 229, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chahine, M.T. The hydrological cycle and its influence on climate. Nature 1992, 359, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, M.C.; Allen, R.G.; Morse, A.; Kustas, W.P. Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 122, 50–65. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qiu, R.; Kang, S.; Li, F.; Du, T.; Tong, L.; Wang, F.; Chen, R.; Liu, J.; Li, S. Energy partitioning and evapotranspiration of hot pepper grown in greenhouse with furrow and drip irrigation methods. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piouceau, J.; Panfili, F.; Bois, G.; Anastase, M.; Dufossé, L.; Arfi, V. Actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients for five species of three-year-old bamboo plants under a tropical climate. Agric. Water Manag. 2014, 137, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bormann, H. Sensitivity analysis of 18 different potential evapotranspiration models to observed climatic change at German climate stations. Clim. Change 2011, 104, 729–753. [Google Scholar]
  8. Webster, P.J. Mechanisms of monsoon low-frequency variability: Surface hydrological effects. J. Atmos. Sci. 1983, 40, 2110–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Thomas, A. Climatic change on the Tibetan Plateau: Potential Evapotranspiration Trends from 1961–2000. Clim. Change 2006, 76, 291–319. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhong, L.; Wang, B.; Han, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Amatya, P.; Ma, W.; et al. Combining MODIS, AVHRR and in situ data for evapotranspiration estimation over heterogeneous landscape of the Tibetan Plateau. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 1507–1515. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, J.; Jiang, S.; Wang, B.; Jiang, W.; Tang, Y.; Du, M.; Gu, S. Evapotranspiration and its energy exchange in alpine meadow ecosystem on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. J. Integr. Agr. 2013, 12, 1396–1401. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yao, J.; Zhao, L.; Ding, Y.; Gu, L.; Jiao, K.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, Y. The surface energy budget and evapotranspiration in the Tanggula region on the Tibetan Plateau. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2008, 52, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, B.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Yang, K.; Chen, D.; Sun, L. Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimates for two river basins on the Tibetan Plateau by a water balance method. J. Hydrol. 2013, 492, 290–297. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yin, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhao, D. Past and future spatiotemporal changes in evapotranspiration and effective moisture on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 10850–10860. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu, G.; Su, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, K.; Li, C. Estimating actual evapotranspiration from an alpine grassland on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau using a two-source model and parameter uncertainty analysis by Bayesian approach. J. Hydrol. 2013, 476, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, D.; Yang, K.; Wang, A. Seasonal evapotranspiration changes (1983–2006) of four large basins on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119, 13079–13095. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, B.; Ma, Y.; Su, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ma, W. Quantifying the evaporation amounts of 75 high elevation large dimictic lakes on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaay8558. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shang, C.; Wu, T.; Ma, N.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, T.; Hu, G.; Li, R.; Yang, S.; et al. Assessment of Different Complementary-Relationship-Based Models for Estimating Actual Terrestrial Evapotranspiration in the Frozen Ground Regions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, S.; Huang, K.; Sun, X.; Song, C.; Sun, J.; Sun, S.; Wang, G.; Hu, Z. Attributing the variations in evapotranspiration and its components of alpine grasslands over the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 2024, 129, 2024JD041165. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Zheng, D. A discussion on the boundary and area of the Tibetan Plateau in China. Geogr. Res. 2002, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zou, D.; Zhao, L.; Sheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, G.; Wu, T.; Wu, J.; Xie, C.; Wu, X.; Pang, Q.; et al. A new map of permafrost distribution on the Tibetan Plateau. Cryosphere 2017, 11, 2527–2542. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, M.; Yao, T.; Gou, X.; Koike, T.; He, Y. The soil moisture distribution, thawing-freezing processes and their effects on the seasonal transition on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2003, 21, 457–465. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu, H.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, T.; Ren, D. Response of soil heat-water processes to vegetation cover on the typical permafrost and seasonally frozen soil in the headwaters of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo, D.; Jin, H.; Lü, L.; Wu, Q. Spatiotemporal characteristics of freezing and thawing of the active layer in the source areas of the Yellow River (SAYR). Chin. Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 3034–3045. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Pu, J.; Ohta, T. Analysis of characteristics evaporation in centre of Tibetan Plateau. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 1994, 16, 166–172. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, X.; Ren, Y.; Yin, Z.; Lin, Z.; Zheng, D. Spatial and temporal variation patterns of reference evapotranspiration across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau during 1971–2004. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114, D15105. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma, W.; Ma, Y.; Ishikawa, H. Evaluation of the SEBS for upscaling the evapotranspiration based on in situ observations over the Tibetan Plateau. Atmos. Res. 2014, 138, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yin, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhao, D.; Zheng, D.; Pan, T. Modelled effects of climate change on actual evapotranspiration in different eco-geographical regions in the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci. 2013, 23, 195–207. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mashabatu, M.; Motsei, N.; Jovanovic, N.; Nhamo, L. A Validation of FruitLook Data Using Eddy Covariance in a Fully Mature and High-Density Japanese Plum Orchard in the Western Cape, South Africa. Water 2025, 17, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ratshiedana, P.E.; Abd Elbasit, M.A.M.; Adam, E.; Chirima, J.G. Evaluation of Micrometeorological Models for Estimating Crop Evapotranspiration Using a Smart Field Weighing Lysimeter. Water 2025, 17, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, L.; Yao, J.; Hu, Z.; Zhao, L. Comparison of the surface energy budget between regions of seasonally frozen ground and permafrost on the Tibetan Plateau. Atmos. Res. 2015, 153, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Monteith, J.L.; Unsworth, M. Principles of Environmental Physics; Edward Asner Publishers: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  33. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evaporation: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements—FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tanaka, K.; Tamagawa, I.; Ishikawa, H.; Ma, Y.; Hu, Z. Surface energy budget and closure of the eastern Tibetan Plateau during the GAME-Tibet IOP 1998. J. Hydrol. 2003, 283, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ye, D.; Gao, Y. The Meteorology of the Qinghai–Xizang (Tibet) Plateau; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1979. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  36. Tang, M.; Shen, Z.; Chen, Y. On climatic characteristics of the Xizang Plateau monsoon. Acta Geogr. Sin. 1979, 34, 33–42. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhou, S.; Jia, L. The beginning and interruption of rainy season over Tibetan Plateau. Meteorol. Mon. 1999, 25, 38–42. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  38. Dai, L.; Fu, R.; Guo, X.; Ke, X.; Du, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y.; Qian, D.; Zhou, H.; Cao, G. Evaluation of actual evapotranspiration measured by large-scale weighing lysimeters in a humid alpine meadow, northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Hydrol. Process. 2021, 35, e14051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pu, C.; Yang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, L.; Zhang, X.; Duan, Y. Comparison of the Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Evapotranspiration in Two Alpine Grasslands on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Plateau Meteor. 2024, 43, 1102–1112. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  40. Gu, S.; Tang, Y.; Cui, X.; Kato, T.; Du, M.; Li, Y.; Zhao, X. Energy exchange between the atmosphere and a meadow ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 129, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Lin, G.; Zhang, W.; Miao, H.; Wei, L.; Huang, J.; Han, X. Energy balance and partition in Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystems with different land use types. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2009, 149, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Tang, Y.; Yang, Y. Trends in pan evaporation and reference and actual evapotranspiration across the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 2007, 112, D12110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, W.; Xing, W.; Shao, Q.; Yu, Z.; Peng, S.; Yang, T.; Yong, B.; Taylor, J.; Singh, V.P. Changes in reference evapotranspiration across the Tibetan Plateau: Observations and future projections based on statistical downscaling. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 4049–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xie, H.; Zhu, X. Reference evapotranspiration trends and their sensitivity to climatic change on the Tibetan Plateau (1970–2009). Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27, 3685–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kerr, G.; Pochop, L.; Fornstrom, K.J.; Krall, J.M.; Brown, D. Soil water and ET estimates for a wide range of rainfed and irrigated conditions. Agr. Water Manag. 1993, 24, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Allen, R.G. Using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigated region as part of an evapotranspiration intercomparison study. J. Hydrol. 2000, 229, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Allen, R.G.; Pruitt, W.O.; Wright, J.L.; Howell, T.A.; Ventura, F.; Snyder, R.; Itenfisu, D.; Steduto, P.; Berengena, J.; Yrisarry, J.B.; et al. A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman–Monteith method. Agr. Water Manag. 2006, 81, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gervais, M.; Mkhabela, M.; Bullock, P.; Raddatz, R.; Finlay, G. Comparison of standard and actual crop evapotranspiration estimates derived from different evapotranspiration methods on the Canadian Prairies. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26, 1467–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. You, Q.; Kang, S.; Tian, K.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, Q. Preliminary analysis on climatic features at Mt. Nyainqentanglha, Tibetan Plateau. J. Mt. Sci. 2007, 25, 497–504. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  50. Ghatak, D.; Sinsky, E.; Miller, J. Role of snow-albedo feedback in higher elevation warming over the Himalayas, Tibetan Plateau and Central Asia. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 114008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, Y.; Guo, D.; Qiu, G.; Cheng, G.; Li, S. Geocryology in China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2000. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  52. Zuo, H.; Li, D.; Hu, Y.; Bao, Y.; Lü, S. Characteristics of climatic trends and correlation between pan-evaporation and environmental factors in the last 40 years over China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2005, 50, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.; Jin, C.; Guan, D.; Wang, A.; Wu, J.; Yuan, F. Long-term eddy covariance monitoring of evapotranspiration and its environmental factors in a temperate mixed forest in Northeast China. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, G.; Chen, W.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Bi, P. Spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of vegetation in 14 different climatic regions in the global from 1981 to 2018. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 75322–75337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dai, L.; Fu, R.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, X.; Du, Y.; Hu, Z.; Cao, G. Comparison of Fourteen Reference Evapotranspiration Models with Lysimeter Measurements at a Site in the Humid Alpine Meadow, Northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 854196. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bouchet, R. Évapotranspiration réelle et potentielle signification climatique. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. 1963, 62, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Locations and photographs of the Naqu and Tanggula observations sites on the TP.
Figure 1. Locations and photographs of the Naqu and Tanggula observations sites on the TP.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g001
Figure 2. Daily mean soil temperature at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites in 2008.
Figure 2. Daily mean soil temperature at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites in 2008.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g002
Figure 3. Daily mean air temperature (a) and wind speed (b) at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Figure 3. Daily mean air temperature (a) and wind speed (b) at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g003
Figure 4. Daily maximum snow depth at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Figure 4. Daily maximum snow depth at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g004
Figure 5. Daily rainfall and actual evapotranspiration (ETa) at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites in 2008. A1/B1: start time of soil thawing, A2/B2: start time of the TPM, A3/B3: end time of the TPM, and A4/B4: start time of soil freezing.
Figure 5. Daily rainfall and actual evapotranspiration (ETa) at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites in 2008. A1/B1: start time of soil thawing, A2/B2: start time of the TPM, A3/B3: end time of the TPM, and A4/B4: start time of soil freezing.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g005
Figure 6. Daily ET0 at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites in 2008.
Figure 6. Daily ET0 at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites in 2008.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g006
Figure 7. Daily crop coefficient (Kc) at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008: (a,b) whole year, (c,d) without snow cover days, and (e,f) with snow cover days.
Figure 7. Daily crop coefficient (Kc) at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008: (a,b) whole year, (c,d) without snow cover days, and (e,f) with snow cover days.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g007aRemotesensing 17 01316 g007b
Figure 8. Comparison between the ETa and ET0 at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites.
Figure 8. Comparison between the ETa and ET0 at the Naqu (a) and Tanggula (b) sites.
Remotesensing 17 01316 g008
Table 1. Monthly total amounts (mm/month) of ETa and ET0 and monthly average Kc of the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Table 1. Monthly total amounts (mm/month) of ETa and ET0 and monthly average Kc of the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
NaquTanggula
ETaET0KcETaET0Kc
January1.8952.110.0411.6833.620.35
February3.9038.510.1023.0127.110.85
March3.6561.120.0617.2647.640.36
April2.6794.920.0321.2466.060.32
May41.1695.970.4362.1177.020.81
June92.48103.050.9093.3592.591.01
July98.08100.590.98106.5595.951.11
August95.7397.330.98107.7190.191.19
September68.0978.960.8678.2565.441.20
October38.9459.760.6536.6336.691.00
November16.289.601.708.7920.440.43
December30.6628.031.0918.6020.760.90
Table 2. Coefficient of the partial correlation between the ETa and ET0 and the meteorological elements at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Table 2. Coefficient of the partial correlation between the ETa and ET0 and the meteorological elements at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
NaquTanggula
ETaET0ETaET0
Net radiation (Rn)0.702 **0.826 **0.782 **0.874 **
Air temperature (Ta)0.795 **0.664 **0.748 **0.674 **
Wind speed (ws)−0.518 **−0.055−0.314 **−0.263 **
Water vapour pressure (e)0.787 **0.322 **0.719 **0.323 **
Surface temperature (T0)0.812 **0.654 **0.770 **0.705 **
Soil water content (smc)0.764**0.341 **0.791 **0.490 **
Note: ** indicates an extremely significant correlation (p < 0.01).
Table 3. The monthly average, monthly maximum, and monthly minimum Kc values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
Table 3. The monthly average, monthly maximum, and monthly minimum Kc values at the Naqu and Tanggula sites in 2008.
NaquTanggula
Monthly AverageMonthly MaximumMonthly MinimumMonthly AverageMonthly MaximumMonthly Minimum
January0.040.87−0.060.351.99−0.09
February0.101.13−0.750.852.630.20
March0.061.06−0.200.361.620.09
April0.030.47−0.240.321.330.06
May0.430.98−0.150.811.630.11
June0.901.170.541.012.000.52
July0.981.230.461.111.650.74
August0.981.200.731.191.840.76
September0.861.150.531.201.550.56
October0.651.080.021.001.70−0.32
November1.703.11−2.940.431.20−1.82
December1.092.760.110.901.300.47
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gu, L.; Yao, J.; Hu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Yu, H.; Sun, F.; Wang, S. Comparison of Actual and Reference Evapotranspiration Between Seasonally Frozen and Permafrost Soils on the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071316

AMA Style

Gu L, Yao J, Hu Z, Ma Y, Yu H, Sun F, Wang S. Comparison of Actual and Reference Evapotranspiration Between Seasonally Frozen and Permafrost Soils on the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(7):1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gu, Lianglei, Jimin Yao, Zeyong Hu, Yaoming Ma, Haipeng Yu, Fanglin Sun, and Shujin Wang. 2025. "Comparison of Actual and Reference Evapotranspiration Between Seasonally Frozen and Permafrost Soils on the Tibetan Plateau" Remote Sensing 17, no. 7: 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071316

APA Style

Gu, L., Yao, J., Hu, Z., Ma, Y., Yu, H., Sun, F., & Wang, S. (2025). Comparison of Actual and Reference Evapotranspiration Between Seasonally Frozen and Permafrost Soils on the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071316

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop