Next Article in Journal
Advanced Building Detection with Faster R-CNN Using Elliptical Bounding Boxes for Displacement Handling
Previous Article in Journal
The Predictive Skill of a Remote Sensing-Based Machine Learning Model for Ice Wedge and Visible Ground Ice Identification in Western Arctic Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bayesian Inference for Post-Processing of Remote-Sensing Image Classification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Perfect Labelling: A Review and Outlook of Label Optimization Techniques in Dynamic Earth Observation

1
Geoinformatics Department, Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences, Karlstraße 6, D-80333 Munich, Germany
2
Institute for Applications of Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems, Lothstraße 34, D-80335 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(7), 1246; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071246
Submission received: 14 February 2025 / Revised: 21 March 2025 / Accepted: 30 March 2025 / Published: 1 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art in Land Cover Classification and Mapping)

Abstract

Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly enhanced the practice of Earth Observation (EO), enabling complex analyses such as land cover change detection, vegetation monitoring, and disaster response. However, while model architectures have matured, the refinement of reference data remains a major challenge. Accurate and dynamic multi-temporal labelling is essential for capturing evolving ground conditions in high-dimensional EO datasets, yet key challenges persist, including spatiotemporal inconsistencies, heterogeneous data integration, and multi-resolution harmonization. Without robust preprocessing, reference labels may introduce biases, resulting in reduced model reliability and generalizability. This review tackles four core aspects of reference data preprocessing in EO: (i) essential steps for producing consistent and high-quality datasets, particularly for dynamic spatiotemporal data; (ii) best practices and guidelines that enable scalable and accurate workflows across diverse EO applications; (iii) introduction of the HELIX framework, a unified approach for standardizing, enhancing, and automating spatiotemporal label preprocessing; and (iv) a forward-looking discussion on the future of reference labels and features, including next-generation techniques for dynamic EO data integration. By synthesizing existing methodologies, highlighting emerging approaches, and addressing current gaps, this review underscores how well-engineered reference data are fundamental to advancing AI/ML-driven EO applications.
Keywords: earth observation; machine learning; deep learning; data fusion; reference data; dynamic labelling; data harmonization; remote sensing; temporal data integration; time series earth observation; machine learning; deep learning; data fusion; reference data; dynamic labelling; data harmonization; remote sensing; temporal data integration; time series
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hauser, S.; Augner, L.; Schmitt, A. Perfect Labelling: A Review and Outlook of Label Optimization Techniques in Dynamic Earth Observation. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071246

AMA Style

Hauser S, Augner L, Schmitt A. Perfect Labelling: A Review and Outlook of Label Optimization Techniques in Dynamic Earth Observation. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(7):1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hauser, Sarah, Lena Augner, and Andreas Schmitt. 2025. "Perfect Labelling: A Review and Outlook of Label Optimization Techniques in Dynamic Earth Observation" Remote Sensing 17, no. 7: 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071246

APA Style

Hauser, S., Augner, L., & Schmitt, A. (2025). Perfect Labelling: A Review and Outlook of Label Optimization Techniques in Dynamic Earth Observation. Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop