Next Article in Journal
GRADE: A Generalization Robustness Assessment via Distributional Evaluation for Remote Sensing Object Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Validation of the MODIS Clumping Index: A Case Study in Saihanba National Forest Park
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Resolution Drone-Based Aeromagnetic Survey at the Tajogaite Volcano (La Palma, Canary Islands): Insights into Its Early Post-Eruptive Shallow Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Multiplatform Remote Sensing Techniques for Active Tectonics, Seismotectonics, and Volcanic Hazard Assessment

by
Daniele Cirillo
1,2,3,*,
Pietro Tizzani
4,5 and
Francesco Brozzetti
1,2,3
1
Laboratory of Structural Geology, 3D Digital Cartography and Geomatics, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
2
Science Department, University G. d’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
3
CRUST—Interuniversity Center for 3D Seismotectonics with Territorial Applications, 66100 Chieti, Italy
4
Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell’Ambiente, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IREA CNR), Via Diocleziano, 328, 80124 Naples, Italy
5
GAIA iLAB at the CNR—Portici Research Center, Piazzale E. Fermi 1, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(22), 3768; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223768
Submission received: 21 October 2025 / Revised: 16 November 2025 / Accepted: 18 November 2025 / Published: 20 November 2025

1. Introduction

In recent years, the continuous improvement of remote sensing technologies has profoundly strengthened our capacity to investigate the active deformation of the Earth’s crust [1]. By combining data from different platforms—satellite, aerial, UAV, and ground-based—researchers have opened new perspectives for studying tectonic, seismotectonic, and volcanic processes [2,3]. These multiplatform approaches deliver multiscale, high-resolution information that allows researchers to monitor surface deformation, identify active faults, and assess volcanic and seismic hazards with unprecedented accuracy [4,5].
This Special Issue aimed to collect original research papers and case studies that integrate remote sensing techniques for the analysis of crustal dynamics, fault systems, and volcanic structures. The contributions highlight innovative methodologies and demonstrate how different sensing systems complement one another, thereby enhancing the quality and interpretation of geospatial data in active tectonic environments.
This Special Issue, “Multiplatform Remote Sensing Techniques for Active Tectonics, Seismotectonics, and Volcanic Hazard Assessment”, presents original research contributions that employ advanced remote sensing, geomatic, and geophysical methodologies—including GNSS, InSAR, LiDAR, DEMs, UAV photogrammetry, GIS, GPR, and magnetometry—to advance the understanding of active deformation, seismotectonics, and volcanic processes in diverse geological settings worldwide.
In total, this Special Issue features 11 high-quality papers, with first authors representing Spain, Italy, China, Greece, Iran, and Slovenia. Their co-authors are affiliated with institutions in Denmark, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Germany, and other countries, reflecting the international and collaborative nature of the research. The presented studies cover a wide range of regions across the globe, including La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain; the Central Apennines, Italy; Campi Flegrei, Italy; Croatia and Greece; the Preveza Region, Greece; Iran; South Africa; Mexico; China–Indonesia islands; South China; the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau; Changbaishan–Tianchi Volcano, Asia; and the Southern Alps, Slovenia. This broad geographic scope emphasizes the global relevance and applicability of remote sensing techniques for investigating active deformation, seismotectonics, and volcanic processes.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

The papers collected in this Special Issue contribute to filling key gaps in the integration of remote sensing data for active tectonic and volcanic studies. By combining multiplatform observations with advanced analytical and modeling approaches, the studies demonstrate how modern techniques can enhance the detection and interpretation of crustal deformation, bridging the divide between surface observations and subsurface processes and supporting more reliable hazard assessment. The following overview summarizes the contributions of this Special Issue, arranged according to their chronological order of publication.
Occhipinti et al. (contribution 1) introduce Snap2DQuake, a Python-based implementation of the ESA SNAP platform for DInSAR analysis. Tested on recent earthquakes in Croatia and Greece, the tool simplifies interferometric processing and produces detailed deformation maps, supporting the broader use of open-source solutions in coseismic deformation studies. The findings highlight the importance of open-source DInSAR workflows as rapid, reliable tools that complement field observations in the early assessment of coseismic deformation.
Cui et al. (contribution 2) investigate satellite-derived carbon monoxide emissions associated with three major earthquakes occurring in different tectonic settings. The temporal and spatial analysis of CO anomalies provides evidence of gas emissions as potential precursory signals, contributing to the understanding of crustal degassing processes related to seismic activity. The findings highlight the potential of satellite-derived gas anomalies as useful precursory indicators, offering added value for understanding seismic processes and improving early-warning perspectives.
Jamšek Rupnik et al. (contribution 3) integrate lidar, photogrammetry, field mapping, and geophysical data to evaluate the late Quaternary activity of the Sava Fault (Slovenia). Subtle geomorphic and structural indicators, combined with OSL dating, indicate a slip rate of 1.8 ± 0.4 mm/yr over the last 27 ka, refining regional seismic hazard assessments for the Southern Alps. The findings highlight the importance of modern high-resolution remote sensing techniques and interdisciplinary approaches in detecting tectonic deformation in relatively low-strain rate environments with intense surface processes.
Wen et al. (contribution 4) apply the P-wave coda autocorrelation method to dense seismic array data from the Changbaishan–Tianchi volcano (China). Their analysis reveals complex crustal discontinuities, including magma conduits and low-velocity anomalies, which exert new constraints on the magmatic system and lithosphere–asthenosphere interactions beneath the volcano. The findings highlight the value of dense seismic-array coda autocorrelation methods for imaging deep crustal structures in volcanic settings, which result in new constraints on magmatic plumbing systems.
Ghari et al. (contribution 5) develop a cross-gradient joint inversion technique integrating DC resistivity and gravity gradient data to improve subsurface imaging. Applied to synthetic and real datasets from Iran and South Africa, the method yields more accurate resistivity and density models, demonstrating applicability for Geoscience, Heritage, and the Built Environment. The findings highlight the advantages of cross-gradient joint inversion for resolving complex subsurface architectures, delivering more robust models for multidisciplinary Geoscience applications.
Mercogliano et al. (contribution 6) propose an Independent Component Analysis (ICA)-based workflow to extract dominant thermal patterns from satellite Thermal Infrared (TIR) data over the Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy). This method isolates distinct thermal signatures related to volcanic and environmental processes, enhancing the interpretation of long-term surface temperature variations in restless calderas. The findings highlight the capability of ICA-based thermal analysis to disentangle overlapping volcanic and environmental processes, offering a robust tool for long-term thermal monitoring of high-risk calderas. Niu et al. (contribution 7) present new geomorphological, photogrammetric, and radiocarbon data on the eastern segment of the Sunan–Qilian Fault in the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau. UAV-derived digital elevation models and trenching evidence indicate Holocene left-lateral activity with an estimated slip rate of 2.0 ± 0.3 mm/yr, suggesting a high potential for future large earthquakes in the fault zone. The findings highlight the effectiveness of UAV-derived geomorphic analyses for quantifying Holocene slip rates, thereby improving the assessment of seismic potential for remote active faults.
Basiou et al. (contribution 8) assess ground deformation and its impact on critical infrastructures in the Preveza region (Greece) using data from the European Ground Motion Service and multi-temporal InSAR analysis. The study quantifies vertical and horizontal displacement rates, highlighting vulnerable infrastructures and demonstrating the operational value of Copernicus services for regional hazard management. The findings highlight the operational relevance of Copernicus ground-motion datasets for identifying vulnerable infrastructures and supporting evidence-based mitigation strategies in tectonically active regions.
Yi et al. (contribution 9) analyze high-resolution seismic reflection data from the offshore segment of the Littoral Fault Zone (South China Sea) to investigate intraplate seismicity linked to graben dynamics. Their results reveal episodic normal faulting and gravitationally driven seismicity, offering new insights into the seismogenic behavior of coastal fault systems under compressional stress regimes. The findings highlight the need to reassess seismic and tsunami hazards along coastal intraplate fault systems, demonstrating the value of high-resolution seismic imaging for shallow crustal processes.
Battistelli et al. (contribution 10) investigate the morphotectonic and geomorphic expression of active deformation in the Central–Southern Apennines (Italy), an area where clear surface faulting evidence is scarce. Through an integrated analysis of topographic, aerial, and InSAR data, the authors identify a 20 km long corridor of diffuse deformation (the Castel di Sangro–Rionero Sannitico alignment), bridging the structural gap between adjacent fault systems and refining the understanding of active normal faulting in this sector of the Apennines. The findings highlight the added value of combining geological, geomorphic, and remote sensing datasets to identify diffuse deformation where clear surface faulting is absent, improving fault-system characterization.
Romero-Toribio et al. (contribution 11) present the first high-resolution drone-based aeromagnetic survey conducted over the Tajogaite volcano (La Palma, Canary Islands). This study provides a detailed three-dimensional magnetic susceptibility model revealing a shallow structure feeding the 2021 eruption and persistent high-temperature zones correlated with major fault systems, demonstrating the potential of UAV magnetometry in post-eruptive monitoring. The findings highlight the potential of drone-based aeromagnetic surveying to resolve shallow post-eruptive structures with unprecedented detail, enhancing monitoring of newly formed volcanic systems.

3. Conclusions

The articles published in this Special Issue collectively show how multiplatform remote sensing techniques are rapidly transforming the study of active tectonics, seismotectonics, and volcanic hazard assessment. The integration of UAV-based photogrammetry, satellite radar interferometry, thermal imaging, and geophysical inversion provides a quantitative understanding of crustal deformation processes at multiple spatial and temporal scales.
By combining advanced remote sensing methods with innovative methodologies for geological and geophysical analysis, the research community can now more effectively identify active structures, monitor ongoing deformation, and mitigate the risks associated with seismic and volcanic activity. These multidisciplinary approaches sharpen the precision of geological interpretations and strengthen hazard assessment and risk mitigation in tectonically and volcanically active regions.
The guest editors express their sincere gratitude to all the authors for their valuable scientific contributions and to the reviewers for their constructive insights, which have significantly enhanced the scientific rigor of this Special Issue. The editors also warmly thank the editorial staff of Remote Sensing for their constant support throughout the publication process. Special appreciation is extended to Ms. Ella Yu (Assistant Editor) for her professional assistance and continuous coordination, to the MDPI editorial team for their efficient handling of each manuscript, and to the academic editors João Catalão Fernandes and Gianluca Groppelli for their editorial supervision of two research articles included in this Special Issue.
We hope that the studies in this Special Issue will inspire the broader remote sensing community and encourage further research on the application of multiplatform remote sensing techniques for the analysis of active tectonics, seismotectonic, and volcanic hazard assessment.
Looking ahead, the integration of AI-based analysis, real-time monitoring systems, and high-resolution remote sensing promises to further advance the understanding of active deformation processes and their associated hazards.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C., P.T., and F.B.; validation, D.C., P.T., and F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.C.; writing—review and editing, D.C., P.T., and F.B.; visualization, D.C., P.T., and F.B.; supervision, D.C., P.T., and F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The guest editors would like to express their sincere appreciation to all the authors for their valuable scientific contributions to this Special Issue. The editors are also deeply grateful to the reviewers for their time, expertise, and constructive feedback, which have greatly contributed to improving the scientific quality and rigor of the published papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Occhipinti, M.; Carboni, F.; Amorini, S.; Paltriccia, N.; López-Martínez, C.; Porreca, M. Implementing the European Space Agency’s SentiNel Application Platform’s Open-Source Python Module for Differential Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry Coseismic Ground Deformation from Sentinel-1 Data. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16010048.
  • Cui, Y.; Huang, J.; Zeng, Z.; Zou, Z. CO Emissions Associated with Three Major Earthquakes Occurring in Diverse Tectonic Environments. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030480.
  • Jamšek Rupnik, P.; Atanackov, J.; Horn, B.; Mušič, B.; Zajc, M.; Grützner, C.; Ustaszewski, K.; Tsukamoto, S.; Novak, M.; Milanič, B., et al. Revealing Subtle Active Tectonic Deformation: Integrating Lidar, Photogrammetry, Field Mapping, and Geophysical Surveys to Assess the Late Quaternary Activity of the Sava Fault (Southern Alps, Slovenia). Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091490.
  • Wen, H.; Tian, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, H. Complex Discontinuity Structure Beneath the Changbaishan-Tianchi Volcano Revealed by the P-Wave Coda Autocorrelation Method Based on Dense Seismic Array. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3615. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193615.
  • Ghari, H.; Parnow, S.; Varfinezhad, R.; Milano, M.; Fourie, F.D.; Tosti, F. Cross-Gradient Joint Inversion of DC Resistivity and Gravity Gradient Data: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach for Geoscience, Heritage, and the Built Environment. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4468. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234468.
  • Mercogliano, F.; Barone, A.; D’Auria, L.; Castaldo, R.; Silvestri, M.; Bellucci Sessa, E.; Caputo, T.; Stroppiana, D.; Caliro, S.; Minopoli, C., et al. Thermal Patterns at the Campi Flegrei Caldera Inferred from Satellite Data and Independent Component Analysis. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4615. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234615.
  • Niu, P.; Han, Z.; Guo, P.; Ma, S.; Ma, H. New Evidence of Holocene Faulting Activity and Strike-Slip Rate of the Eastern Segment of the Sunan–Qilian Fault from UAV-Based Photogrammetry and Radiocarbon Dating, NE Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244704.
  • Basiou, E.; Castro-Melgar, I.; Kranis, H.; Karavias, A.; Lekkas, E.; Parcharidis, I. Assessment of the Ground Vulnerability in the Preveza Region (Greece) Using the European Ground Motion Service and Geospatial Data Concerning Critical Infrastructures. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020327.
  • Yi, H.; Zhan, W.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; Wu, X.; Sun, J.; Yao, Y.; Huang, J.; Ju, Z. Shallow Structural Deformation Reveals Intraplate Seismicity Triggered by Graben Motion in the South China Littoral Fault Zone. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17132153.
  • Battistelli, M.; Ferrarini, F.; Bucci, F.; Santangelo, M.; Cardinali, M.; Boncori, J.P.M.; Cirillo, D.; Carafa, M.M.C.; Brozzetti, F. Bridging the Gap Between Active Faulting and Deformation Across Normal-Fault Systems in the Central-Southern Apennines (Italy): Multi-Scale and Multi-Source Data Analysis. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2491. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142491.
  • Romero-Toribio, M.C.; Martín-Hernández, F.; Ledo, J. High-Resolution Drone-Based Aeromagnetic Survey at the Tajogaite Volcano (La Palma, Canary Islands): Insights into Its Early Post-Eruptive Shallow Structure. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3153. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183153.

References

  1. Tronin, A.A. Satellite Remote Sensing in Seismology. A Review. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 124–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Antoine, R.; Lopez, T.; Tanguy, M.; Lissak, C.; Gailler, L.; Labazuy, P.; Fauchard, C. Geoscientists in the Sky: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Responding to Geohazards. Surv. Geophys. 2020, 41, 1285–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, Z.; Zhang, P.; Oguchi, T.; He, Z. Remote Sensing Perspectives on Geomorphology and Tectonic Processes. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silva-Fragoso, A.; Norini, G.; Nappi, R.; Groppelli, G.; Michetti, A.M. Improving the Accuracy of Digital Terrain Models Using Drone-Based LiDAR for the Morpho-Structural Analysis of Active Calderas: The Case of Ischia Island, Italy. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cirillo, D.; Tangari, A.C.; Scarciglia, F.; Lavecchia, G.; Brozzetti, F. UAV-PPK Photogrammetry, GIS, and Soil Analysis to Estimate Long-Term Slip Rates on Active Faults in a Seismic Gap of Northern Calabria (Southern Italy). Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cirillo, D.; Tizzani, P.; Brozzetti, F. Multiplatform Remote Sensing Techniques for Active Tectonics, Seismotectonics, and Volcanic Hazard Assessment. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3768. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223768

AMA Style

Cirillo D, Tizzani P, Brozzetti F. Multiplatform Remote Sensing Techniques for Active Tectonics, Seismotectonics, and Volcanic Hazard Assessment. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(22):3768. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223768

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cirillo, Daniele, Pietro Tizzani, and Francesco Brozzetti. 2025. "Multiplatform Remote Sensing Techniques for Active Tectonics, Seismotectonics, and Volcanic Hazard Assessment" Remote Sensing 17, no. 22: 3768. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223768

APA Style

Cirillo, D., Tizzani, P., & Brozzetti, F. (2025). Multiplatform Remote Sensing Techniques for Active Tectonics, Seismotectonics, and Volcanic Hazard Assessment. Remote Sensing, 17(22), 3768. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17223768

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop