Next Article in Journal
Across-Beam Signal Integration Approach with Ubiquitous Digital Array Radar for High-Speed Target Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Satellite-Based Prediction of Water Turbidity Using Surface Reflectance and Field Spectral Data in a Dynamic Tropical Lake
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Detailed Performance Evaluation of the GK2A Fog Detection Algorithm Using Ground-Based Visibility Meter Data (2021–2023, Part I)

by
Hyun-Kyoung Lee
1,2 and
Myoung-Seok Suh
2,*
1
National Meteorological Satellite Center (NMSC), Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA), Guam-gil 64-18, Jincheon-gun 27803, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Atmospheric Science, Kongju National University, 56 Gongjudaehak-ro, Gongju-si 32588, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(15), 2596; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152596
Submission received: 28 May 2025 / Revised: 15 July 2025 / Accepted: 19 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of the operational GK2A (GEO-KOMPSAT-2A) fog detection algorithm (GK2A_FDA) using ground-based visibility meter data from 176 stations across South Korea from 2021 to 2023. According to the verification method using the nearest pixel and 3 × 3 neighborhood pixel approaches to the visibility meter, the 3-year average probability of detection (POD) is 0.59 and 0.70, the false alarm ratio (FAR) is 0.86 and 0.81, and the bias is 4.25 and 3.73, respectively. POD is highest during daytime (0.72; bias: 7.34), decreases at night (0.57; bias: 3.89), and is lowest at twilight (0.52; bias: 2.36). The seasonal mean POD is 0.65 in winter, 0.61 in spring and autumn, and 0.47 in summer, with August reaching the minimum value, 0.33. While POD is higher in coastal areas than inland areas, inland regions show lower FAR, indicating more stable performance. Over-detections occurred regardless of geographic location and time, mainly due to the misclassification of low-level clouds and cloud edges as fog. Especially after sunrise, the fog dissipated and transformed into low-level clouds. These findings suggest that there are limitations to improving fog detection levels using satellite data alone, especially when the surface is obscured by clouds, indicating the need to utilize other data sources, such as objective ground-based analysis data.
Keywords: fog; GK2A/AMI; visibility meter; detection level; regional and seasonal differences fog; GK2A/AMI; visibility meter; detection level; regional and seasonal differences

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.-K.; Suh, M.-S. A Detailed Performance Evaluation of the GK2A Fog Detection Algorithm Using Ground-Based Visibility Meter Data (2021–2023, Part I). Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152596

AMA Style

Lee H-K, Suh M-S. A Detailed Performance Evaluation of the GK2A Fog Detection Algorithm Using Ground-Based Visibility Meter Data (2021–2023, Part I). Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(15):2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152596

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hyun-Kyoung, and Myoung-Seok Suh. 2025. "A Detailed Performance Evaluation of the GK2A Fog Detection Algorithm Using Ground-Based Visibility Meter Data (2021–2023, Part I)" Remote Sensing 17, no. 15: 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152596

APA Style

Lee, H.-K., & Suh, M.-S. (2025). A Detailed Performance Evaluation of the GK2A Fog Detection Algorithm Using Ground-Based Visibility Meter Data (2021–2023, Part I). Remote Sensing, 17(15), 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152596

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop