# Analysis of Wave Breaking on Gaofen-3 and TerraSAR-X SAR Image and Its Effect on Wave Retrieval

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Datasets

#### 2.1. SAR Images and In Situ Data

#### 2.2. Hindcast Data

## 3. Methodology

#### 3.1. NP Estimation

#### 3.2. Radar Backscattering Model

_{0}is the wave number of microwave radar (i.e., ~5 cm for GF-3 and 3 cm for TS-X); θ is the radar incidence angle; ϕ is the satellite’s flight direction; and Sp and St are the Bragg wave-tilted slopes parallel and normal to the direction of the radar beam. ${\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{s}}$ is the Bragg scattering coefficient, which is evaluated as follows:

_{i}is the effective incidence angle, and ζ is the sea surface height modulated by the wave and current fields.

_{10}, to produce the wave spectrum E using the well-known wind-sea Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP) model [46], and to forward calculate the sea surface slopes together with the current. As revealed in [17], the co-polarized NRCS suffers saturation problems at high winds (i.e., >25 m/s), and the simulated Bragg resonant component in NRCS has poor results at such conditions.

#### 3.3. Wave Retrieval Algorithm

_{k}is the first-guess spectrum produced by the JONSWAP model; ${\overline{\mathrm{F}}}_{\mathrm{k}}$ is the SAR-derived wave spectrum obtained in the minimization process; ${\overline{\mathrm{S}}}_{\mathrm{k}}$ is the mapping SAR spectrum obtained using the wave spectrum; ${\mathrm{S}}_{\mathrm{k}}$ is the SAR original intensity spectrum; μ is the weight coefficient; and k is the wave number. The constant B is assumed to be 0.001 so as to ensure convergence of the iteration.

_{s}, which is employed for the division of the SAR intensity spectrum into a linear-mapped wind portion and a nonlinear-mapped swell portion [49]:

^{2}; V = 7600 m/s; R is the distance in the slant direction; U

_{10}is the wind speed; θ is the incidence angle; and φ is the angle of the wave propagation direction relative to the direction of the radar beam.

_{s}, the wave spectrum is initially produced by the JONSWAP, which is treated as a first-guess spectrum in Equation (16), and then, the wind-sea spectrum is inverted from the corresponding SAR portion after minimizing the cost function J. The swell spectrum is simply inverted from the linear-mapped SAR portion, in which the wave number k is less than k

_{s}, without considering the non-linear velocity bunching modulation. It was found that the RMSE of the SWH was about 0.5 m when using the PFSM algorithm for GF-3 [47] and TS-X [46] SAR images.

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Wind and Wave Retrieval

#### 4.2. NP Contribution in Dual-Polarized C-Band and X-Band SAR

#### 4.3. Discussion

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

Forcing field | European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data at a 0.25° gird and a time interval of 1-h sea surface current data from HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) at a spatial resolution of 0.08° grid and a time interval of 3-h; and water depth data from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO) having a spatial resolution of 0.01° grid |

Other settings | The bins ranged logarithmically between 0.04118 and 0.7186 at an interval of Δf/f = 0.1. The spatial propagation was characterized by 300 s time steps in both the longitudinal and latitudinal directions. |

Resolution | Significant wave height having at a 0.05° gird and temporal resolution of 30-min and the wave spectrum resolved into 24 regular azimuthal directions at a step of 15°. |

Parameterizations | The input/dissipation terms using switches ST2 and STAB2; the wave-wave interactions using the switch GMD |

## Appendix B

_{B}is the wave breaking parameter; g = 9.8 m/s

^{2}; v is the kinematic viscosity of air; u

_{*}is the air friction velocity; C

_{d}is the drag coefficient; U

_{10}is the drag coefficient; β is the wave age; and ${\omega}_{p}$ is the peak angular frequency of the wind-wave. Therefore, the whitecap coverage is conveniently calculated when the wind and wave parameters are known.

## References

- Melville, K. The role of surface-wave breaking in air-sea interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech.
**1996**, 28, 279–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sun, Z.F.; Shao, W.Z.; Yu, W.P.; Li, J. A study of wave-induced effects on sea surface temperature simulations during typhoon events. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 9, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sun, Z.F.; Shao, W.Z.; Wang, W.L.; Zhou, W.; Yu, W.P.; Shen, W. Analysis of wave-induced stokes transport effects on sea surface temperature simulations in the Western Pacific Ocean. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 9, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Isaksen, L.; Stoffelen, A. ERS scatterometer wind data impact on ECMWF’s tropical cyclone forecasts. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electron.
**2000**, 38, 1885–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stoffelen, A.; Anderson, T. Wind retrieval and ERS-1 scatterometer radar backscatter measurements. Adv. Space Res.
**1993**, 13, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lemoine, F.G.; Zelensky, N.P.; Chinn, D.S.; Pavlis, D.E.; Rowlands, D.D.; Beckley, B.; Luthcke, S.B.; Willis, P.; Ziebart, M.; Luceri, V. Towards development of a consistent orbit series for TOPEX, Jason-1, and Jason-2. Adv. Space. Res.
**2010**, 46, 1513–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hersbach, H. Comparison of C-band scatterometer CMOD5.N equivalent neutral winds with ECMWF. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.
**2010**, 27, 721–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, W.Z.; Nunziata, F.; Zhang, Y.G.; Corcione, V.; Migliaccio, M. Wind speed retrieval from the Gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar for VV- and HH-polarization using a re-tuned algorithm. Eur. J. Remote Sens.
**2021**, 54, 318–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, W.Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.M.; Wang, W.L. Sea surface wind speed retrieval from TerraSAR-X HH polarization data using an improved polarization ratio model. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth. Obs. Remote Sens.
**2016**, 9, 4991–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chapron, B.; Johnsen, H.; Garello, R. Wave and wind retrieval from SAR images of the ocean. Ann. Intern. Med.
**2001**, 56, 682–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Monaldo, M. Comparison of SAR-derived wind speed with model predictions and ocean buoy measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2001**, 39, 2587–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, X.M.; Lehner, S. Algorithm for sea surface wind retrieval from TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2014**, 52, 2928–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Shimada, T.; Kawamura, H. An L-band geophysical model function for SAR wind retrieval using JERS-1 SAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2003**, 41, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, X.F.; Li, X.F.; Zheng, Q.A.; Gu, X.F.; Pichel, W.G.; Li, Z.W. Comparison of ocean-surface winds retrieved from QuikSCAT scatterometer and Radarsat-1 SAR in offshore waters of the U.S. west coast. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett.
**2011**, 8, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yao, R.; Shao, W.Z.; Jiang, X.W.; Yu, T. Wind speed retrieval from Chinese Gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar using an analytical approach in the nearshore waters of China’s seas. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2022**, 43, 3028–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, W.Z.; Sheng, Y.X.; Sun, J. Preliminary assessment of wind and wave retrieval from Chinese Gaofen-3 SAR imagery. Sensors
**2017**, 17, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hwang, A.; Zhang, B.; Toporkov, V.; Perrie, W. Comparison of composite Bragg theory and quad-polarization radar backscatter from RADARSAT-2: With applications to wave breaking and high wind retrieval. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**2010**, 115, C08019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Zhang, B.; Perrie, W. Cross-Polarized Synthetic Aperture Radar: A new potential measurement technique for hurricanes. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.
**2012**, 93, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Shao, W.Z.; Yuan, X.Z.; Sheng, Y.X.; Sun, J.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, Q.J. Development of wind speed retrieval from cross-polarization Chinese Gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar in typhoons. Sensors
**2018**, 18, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Engen, G.; Vachon, P.W.; Johnsen, H.; Dobson, F.W. Retrieval of ocean wave spectra and RAR MTF’s from dual-polarization SAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2000**, 38, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dankert, H.; Horstmann, J. Detection of wave groups in SAR images and radar image sequences. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2003**, 41, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alpers, R.; Bruening, C. On the relative importance of motion-related contributions to the SAR Imaging mechanism of ocean surface waves. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**1986**, GE-24, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alpers, R.; Ross, B.; Rufenach, L. On the detectability of ocean surface waves by real and synthetic aperture radar. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**1981**, 86, 6481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hasselmann, K.; Hasselmann, S. On the nonlinear mapping of an ocean wave spectrum into a synthetic aperture radar image spectrum and its inversion. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**1991**, 96, 10713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mastenbroek, C.; Valk, C. A semiparametric algorithm to retrieve ocean wave spectra from synthetic aperture radar. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**2000**, 105, 3497–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Schulz-Stellenfleth, J.; Lehner, S.; Hoja, D. A parametric scheme for the retrieval of two-dimensional ocean wave spectra from synthetic aperture radar look cross spectra. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**2005**, 110, C05004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Shao, W.Z.; Jiang, X.W.; Sun, Z.F.; Hu, Y.Y.; Marino, A.; Zhang, Y.G. Evaluation of wave retrieval for Chinese Gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci.
**2022**, 25, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stopa, E.; Mouche, A. Significant wave heights from Sentinel-1 SAR: Validation and applications. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**2017**, 122, 1827–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Pleskachevsky, L.; Rosenthal, W.; Lehner, S. Meteo-marine parameters for highly variable environment in coastal regions from satellite radar images. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.
**2016**, 119, 464–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pleskachevsky, A.; Jacobsen, S.; Tings, B.; Schwarz, E. Estimation of sea state from Sentinel-1 Synthetic aperture radar imagery for maritime situation awareness. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2019**, 40, 4104–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alpers, W.; Brümmer, B. Atmospheric boundary layer rolls observed by the synthetic aperture radar aboard the ERS-1 satellite. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**1994**, 99, 12613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, L.; Shi, H.; Du, H.; Chen, X. Estimation of sea surface wind direction using spaceborne SAR images and wavelet analysis. J. Remote Sen.
**2014**, 18, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kudryavtsev, V.N.; Chapron, B.; Myasoedov, A.G.; Collard, F.; Johannessen, J.A. On dual co-polarized SAR measurements of the ocean surface. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett.
**2013**, 10, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kudryavtsev, V.; Kozlov, I.; Chapron, B.; Johannessen, J.A. Quad-polarization SAR features of ocean currents. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**2014**, 119, 6046–6065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kudryavtsev, V.; Fan, S.; Zhang, B.; Mouche, A.; Chapron, B. On quad-polarized SAR measurements of the ocean surface. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
**2019**, 57, 8362–8370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sun, Z.F.; Shao, W.Z.; Jiang, X.W.; Nunziata, F.; Wang, W.L.; Shen, W.; Migliaccio, M. Contribution of breaking wave on the co-polarized backscattering measured by the Chinese Gaofen-3 SAR. Int. J. Remote Sens.
**2022**, 43, 1384–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Viana, R.; Lorenzzetti, J.; Carvalho, J.; Nunziata, F. Estimating energy dissipation rate from breaking waves using polarimetric SAR images. Sensors
**2020**, 20, 6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, Y.Y.; Shao, W.Z.; Shi, J.; Sun, J.; Ji, Q.Y.; Cai, L.N. Analysis of the typhoon wave distribution simulated in WAVEWATCH- III model in the context of Kuroshio and wind-induced current. J. Oceanol. Limnol.
**2020**, 38, 1692–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Plant, J. A stochastic, multiscale model of microwave backscatter from the ocean. J. Geophys. Res.
**2002**, 107, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xie, T.; Zhao, S.Z.; Perrie, W.; Fang, H.; Yu, W.J.; He, Y.J. Electromagnetic backscattering from one-dimensional drifting fractal sea surface I: Wave–current coupled model. Chin. Phys. B
**2016**, 25, 064101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kudryavtsev, S.; Hauser, D.; Caudal, G.; Chapron, B. A semiempirical model of the normalized radar cross-section of the sea surface 1. Background model. J. Geophys. Res.
**2003**, 108, FET21–FET224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Phillips, M. Spectral and statistical properties of the equilibrium range in wind-generated gravity waves. J. Fluid. Mech.
**1985**, 156, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pierson, J.; Moskowitz, L. A proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on the similarity theory of S. A. Kitaigorodskii. J. Geophys. Res. Planets
**1964**, 69, 5181–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Romeiser, R.; Alpers, W.; Wismann, V. An improved composite surface model for the radar backscattering cross section of the ocean surface: 1. Theory of the model and optimization/validation by scatterometer data. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**1997**, 102, 25237–25250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Elfouhaily, T.; Chapron, B.; Katsaros, K.; Vandemark, D. A unified directional spectrum for long and short wind-driven waves. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans
**1997**, 102, 15781–15796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hasselmann, E.; Dunckel, M.; Ewing, A. Directional wave spectra observed during JONSWAP 1973. J. Phys. Oceanogr.
**1980**, 10, 1264–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, W.Z.; Li, X.F.; Sun, J. Ocean wave parameters retrieval from TerraSAR-X images validated against buoy measurements and model results. Remote Sens.
**2015**, 7, 12815–12828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Zhu, S.; Shao, W.Z.; Armando, M.; Shi, J.; Sun, J.; Yuan, X.Z.; Hu, J.C.; Yang, D.K.; Zuo, J.C. Evaluation of Chinese quad-polarization Gaofen-3 SAR wave mode data for significant wave height retrieval. Can. J. Remote Sens.
**2019**, 44, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sun, J.; Guan, C.L. Parameterized first-guess spectrum method for retrieving directional spectrum of swell-dominated waves and huge waves from SAR images. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limn.
**2006**, 24, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, W.; Lai, Z.; Nunziata, F.; Buono, A.; Jiang, X.; Zuo, J. Wind field retrieval with rain correction from dual-polarized Sentinel-1 SAR imagery collected during tropical cyclones. Remote Sens.
**2022**, 14, 5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, W.; Hu, Y.; Nunziata, F.; Corcione, V.; Migliaccio, M.; Li, X. Cyclone wind retrieval based on X-band SAR-derived wave parameter estimation. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.
**2020**, 37, 1907–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, D.L.; Toba, Y. Dependence of whitecap coverage on wind and wind-wave properties. J. Oceanogr.
**2001**, 57, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measured normalized radar cross sections (NRCSs) of (

**a**) a VV-polarized Gaofen-3 (GF-3) image acquired at 01:58 UTC on 5 May 2017 and (

**b**) a TerraSAR-X (TS-X) image acquired at 16:53 UTC on 3 August 2009. Note that the three buoys located in these images are marked by white crosses.

**Figure 2.**(

**a**) The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data (ERA-5) wind map at 2:00 UTC on 5 May 2017; and (

**b**) The ERA-5 wind map at 17:00 UTC on 3 August 2009. The black rectangle denotes the spatial coverage of two images in Figure 1.

**Figure 3.**(

**a**) The HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) sea surface current map at 3:00 UTC on 5 May 2017; and (

**b**) The HYCOM sea surface current map at 18:00 UTC on 3 August 2009. The black rectangle denotes the spatial coverage of two images in Figure 1.

**Figure 4.**The significant wave height (SWH) maps at 09:00 UTC on 20 Sep 2021 from the (

**a**) ERA-5 and (

**b**) WAVEWATCH-III (WW3) data.

**Figure 5.**(

**a**) Validation of WW3-simulated SWHs against ERA-5 for SWHs of 0–4 m; and (

**b**) validation of WW3-simulated whitecap coverage against NDBC buoy data at wind speeds 0–18 m/s.

**Figure 7.**SAR-derived wind maps obtained (

**a**) using CSARMOD-GF from the GF-3 SAR image at 1:58 UTC on 5 May 2017, and (

**b**) using XMOD-2 from the TS-X image at 16:53 UTC on 3 August 2009.

**Figure 8.**The one-dimensional wave spectra obtained using the parameterized first-guess spectrum method (PFSM) scheme: (

**a**) results for a sub-scene of the GF-3 SAR image covering a buoyed area (ID: 46054); and (

**b**) results for a sub-scene on the TS-X image covering a buoyed area (ID: 51001).

**Figure 9.**Validation of SAR-derived SWH against simulation results of the WW3 model in terms of wind speeds between 0 and 25 m/s.

**Figure 10.**The composited NRCS map, including the Bragg resonant and N-P contribution: (

**a**) GF-3 image acquired at 01:58 UTC on 5 May 2017; (

**b**) TS-X image acquired at 16:53 UTC on 3 August 2009.

**Figure 11.**Comparison of composited NRCS with SAR-measured NRCS for wind speeds of 0 to 25 m/s. The blue and red marks illustrate the results for GF-3 and TS-X, respectively.

**Figure 12.**The relations between the ratio (${\mathsf{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{wb}}/{\mathsf{\sigma}}_{0}^{\mathrm{VV}}$ and ${\mathsf{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{wb}}/{\mathsf{\sigma}}_{0}^{\mathrm{HH}}$ ) and the (a,b) SAR-derived wind speed, (c,d) SAR-derived SWH, and (e,f) HYCOM current speed. The blue and red marks illustrate the results for GF-3 and TS-X, respectively.

**Figure 13.**Validation of the SAR-derived SWH against the simulation results of the WW3 model in terms of the whitecap coverage from the WW3 model. The color bar denotes the SAR-derived wind speed.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Zhong, R.; Shao, W.; Zhao, C.; Jiang, X.; Zuo, J.
Analysis of Wave Breaking on Gaofen-3 and TerraSAR-X SAR Image and Its Effect on Wave Retrieval. *Remote Sens.* **2023**, *15*, 574.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030574

**AMA Style**

Zhong R, Shao W, Zhao C, Jiang X, Zuo J.
Analysis of Wave Breaking on Gaofen-3 and TerraSAR-X SAR Image and Its Effect on Wave Retrieval. *Remote Sensing*. 2023; 15(3):574.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030574

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Zhong, Ruozhu, Weizeng Shao, Chi Zhao, Xingwei Jiang, and Juncheng Zuo.
2023. "Analysis of Wave Breaking on Gaofen-3 and TerraSAR-X SAR Image and Its Effect on Wave Retrieval" *Remote Sensing* 15, no. 3: 574.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030574