Next Article in Journal
CORN: An Alternative Way to Utilize Time-Series Data of SAR Images in Newly Built Construction Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Joint Spatial-spectral Resolution Enhancement of Multispectral Images with Spectral Matrix Factorization and Spatial Sparsity Constraints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Multi-Satellite Observed Column Atmospheric CO2 Using Precision-Weighted Kriging Method
Open AccessArticle

Impact of the Dust Aerosol Model on the VIIRS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) Product across China

Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100101, China
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing 100048, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(6), 991;
Received: 22 February 2020 / Revised: 16 March 2020 / Accepted: 17 March 2020 / Published: 19 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollution)
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) has been observing aerosol optical depth (AOD), which is a critical parameter in air pollution and climate change, for more than 7 years since 2012. Due to limited and uneven distribution of the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) station in China, the independent data from the Campaign on Atmospheric Aerosol Research Network of China (CARE-China) was used to evaluate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) VIIRS AOD products in six typical sites and analyze the influence of the aerosol model selection process in five subregions, particularly for dust. Compared with ground-based observations, the performance of all retrievals (except the Shapotou (SPT) site) is similar to other previous studies on a global scale. However, the results illustrate that the AOD retrievals with the dust model showed poor consistency with a regression equation as y = 0.312x + 0.086, while the retrievals obtained from the other models perform much better with a regression equation as y = 0.783x + 0.119. The poor AOD retrieval with the dust model was also verified by a comparison with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol product. The results show they have a lower correlation coefficient (R) and a higher mean relative error (MRE) when the aerosol model used in the retrieval is identified as dust. According to the Ultraviolet Aerosol Index (UVAI), the frequency of dust type over southern China is inconsistent with the actual atmospheric condition. In addition, a comparison of ground-based Ångström exponent (α) values yields an unexpected result that the dust model percentage exceed 40% when α < 1.0, and the mean α shows a high value of ~0.75. Meanwhile, the α peak value (~1.1) of the “dust” model determined by a satellite retravel algorithm indicate there is some problem in the dust model selection process. This mismatching of the aerosol model may partly explain the low accuracy at the SPT and the systemic biases in regional and global validations. View Full-Text
Keywords: AOD; VIIRS; validation; dust aerosol model; CARE-China; Ångström exponent AOD; VIIRS; validation; dust aerosol model; CARE-China; Ångström exponent
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Xin, J.; Wang, X. Impact of the Dust Aerosol Model on the VIIRS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) Product across China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 991.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop