Next Article in Journal
Hyperspectral Measurements Enable Pre-Symptomatic Detection and Differentiation of Contrasting Physiological Effects of Late Blight and Early Blight in Potato
Previous Article in Journal
Multiplatform Earth Observation Systems for Monitoring Water Quality in Vulnerable Inland Ecosystems: Maspalomas Water Lagoon
Previous Article in Special Issue
A LSTM Algorithm Estimating Pseudo Measurements for Aiding INS during GNSS Signal Outages
Open AccessArticle

Investigation of Tightly Combined Single-Frequency and Single-Epoch Precise Positioning Using Multi-GNSS Data

1
GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430000, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430000, China
3
Qianxun Spatial Intelligence Inc., Bay Valley Hi-tech Park, North Guoquan Road, Shanghai 200000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(2), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020285
Received: 10 December 2019 / Revised: 7 January 2020 / Accepted: 13 January 2020 / Published: 15 January 2020
The loose combination (LC) and the tight combination (TC) are two different models in the combined processing of four global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs). The former is easy to implement but may be unusable with few satellites, while the latter should cope with the inter-system bias (ISB) and is applicable for few tracked satellites. Furthermore, in both models, the inter-frequency bias (IFB) in the GLObal NAvigation Satellite System (GLONASS) system should also be removed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the performance difference of ambiguity resolution and position estimation between these two models simultaneously using the single-frequency data of all four systems (GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS)) in three different environments, i.e., in an open area, with surrounding high buildings, and under a block of high buildings. For this purpose, we first provide the definition of ISB and IFB from the perspective of the hardware delays, and then propose practical algorithms to estimate the IFB rate and ISB. Thereafter, a comprehensive performance comparison was made between the TC and LC models. Experiments were conducted to simulate the above three observation environments: the typical situation and situations suffering from signal obstruction with high elevation angles and limited azimuths, respectively. The results show that in a typical situation, the TC and LC models achieve a similar performance. However, when the satellite signals are severely obstructed and few satellites are tracked, the float solution and ambiguity fixing rates in the LC model are dramatically decreased, while in the TC model, there are only minor declines and the difference in the ambiguity fixing rates can be as large as 30%. The correctly fixed ambiguity rates in the TC model also had an improvement of around 10%. Once the ambiguity was fixed, both models achieved a similar positioning accuracy. View Full-Text
Keywords: tight combination; inter-frequency bias; inter-system bias; multi-GNSS tight combination; inter-frequency bias; inter-system bias; multi-GNSS
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, C.; Liu, Q.; Zou, X.; Tang, W.; Cui, J.; Wang, Y.; Guo, C. Investigation of Tightly Combined Single-Frequency and Single-Epoch Precise Positioning Using Multi-GNSS Data. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 285.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop