Next Article in Journal
Linking Remote Sensing and Geodiversity and Their Traits Relevant to Biodiversity—Part I: Soil Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Forest Connectivity, Host Assemblage Characteristics of Local and Neighboring Counties, and Temperature Jointly Shape the Spatial Expansion of Lyme Disease in United States
Previous Article in Special Issue
Compensation of Dispersion in Sinuous Antennas for Polarimetric Ground Penetrating Radar Applications
Open AccessArticle

High-Frequency Electromagnetic Induction (HFEMI) Sensor Results from IED Constituent Parts

1
ERDC Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
2
Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Consulting, LLC, Racha St. 48, Gldanis Dasaxleba, Tbilisi 0101, Georgia
3
Geophex, Ltd., 605 Mercury Street, Raleigh, NC 27603, USA
4
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(20), 2355; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202355
Received: 26 August 2019 / Revised: 3 October 2019 / Accepted: 5 October 2019 / Published: 11 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Subsurface Sensing Technologies)
The detection and classification of subsurface improvised explosive devices (IEDs) remains one of the most pressing military and civilian problems worldwide. These IEDs are often intentionally made with either very small metallic parts or less-conducting parts in order to evade low-frequency electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors, or metal detectors, which operate at frequencies of 50 kHz or less. Recently, high-frequency electromagnetic induction (HFEMI), which extends the established EMI frequency range above 50 kHz to 20 MHz and bridges the gap between EMI and ground-penetrating radar frequencies, has shown promising results related to detecting and identifying IEDs. In this higher frequency range, less-conductive targets display signature inphase and quadrature responses similar to higher conducting targets in the LFEMI range. IED constituent parts, such as carbon rods, small pressure plates, conductivity voids, low metal content mines, and short wires respond to HFEMI but not to traditional low-frequency EMI (LFEMI). Results from recent testing over mock-ups of less-conductive IEDs or their components show distinctive HFEMI responses, suggesting that this new sensing realm could augment the detection and discrimination capability of established EMI technology. In this paper, we present results of using the HFEMI sensor over IED-like targets at the Fort AP Hill test site. We show that results agree with numerical modeling thus providing motives to incorporate sensing at these frequencies into traditional EMI and/or GPR-based sensors. View Full-Text
Keywords: electromagnetic induction; landmine detection; high-frequency EMI; voids; IED electromagnetic induction; landmine detection; high-frequency EMI; voids; IED
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrowes, B.; Prishvin, M.; Jutras, G.; Shubitidze, F. High-Frequency Electromagnetic Induction (HFEMI) Sensor Results from IED Constituent Parts. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2355.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop