Next Article in Journal
GEOBIA 2016: Advances in Object-Based Image Analysis—Linking with Computer Vision and Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Ball Pivot Algorithm-Based Ground Filtering Mechanism for LiDAR Data
Review

Methodological Ambiguity and Inconsistency Constrain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as A Silver Bullet for Monitoring Ecological Restoration

1
Centre for Mine Site Restoration, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
2
School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
3
School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(10), 1180; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101180
Received: 14 April 2019 / Revised: 15 May 2019 / Accepted: 16 May 2019 / Published: 17 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Remote Sensing)
The last decade has seen an exponential increase in the application of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to ecological monitoring research, though with little standardisation or comparability in methodological approaches and research aims. We reviewed the international peer-reviewed literature in order to explore the potential limitations on the feasibility of UAV-use in the monitoring of ecological restoration, and examined how they might be mitigated to maximise the quality, reliability and comparability of UAV-generated data. We found little evidence of translational research applying UAV-based approaches to ecological restoration, with less than 7% of 2133 published UAV monitoring studies centred around ecological restoration. Of the 48 studies, > 65% had been published in the three years preceding this study. Where studies utilised UAVs for rehabilitation or restoration applications, there was a strong propensity for single-sensor monitoring using commercially available RPAs fitted with the modest-resolution RGB sensors available. There was a strong positive correlation between the use of complex and expensive sensors (e.g., LiDAR, thermal cameras, hyperspectral sensors) and the complexity of chosen image classification techniques (e.g., machine learning), suggesting that cost remains a primary constraint to the wide application of multiple or complex sensors in UAV-based research. We propose that if UAV-acquired data are to represent the future of ecological monitoring, research requires a) consistency in the proven application of different platforms and sensors to the monitoring of target landforms, organisms and ecosystems, underpinned by clearly articulated monitoring goals and outcomes; b) optimization of data analysis techniques and the manner in which data are reported, undertaken in cross-disciplinary partnership with fields such as bioinformatics and machine learning; and c) the development of sound, reasonable and multi-laterally homogenous regulatory and policy framework supporting the application of UAVs to the large-scale and potentially trans-disciplinary ecological applications of the future. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecological restoration; drone; UAS; rehabilitation; revegetation ecological restoration; drone; UAS; rehabilitation; revegetation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Buters, T.M.; Bateman, P.W.; Robinson, T.; Belton, D.; Dixon, K.W.; Cross, A.T. Methodological Ambiguity and Inconsistency Constrain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as A Silver Bullet for Monitoring Ecological Restoration. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101180

AMA Style

Buters TM, Bateman PW, Robinson T, Belton D, Dixon KW, Cross AT. Methodological Ambiguity and Inconsistency Constrain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as A Silver Bullet for Monitoring Ecological Restoration. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11(10):1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101180

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buters, Todd M., Philip W. Bateman, Todd Robinson, David Belton, Kingsley W. Dixon, and Adam T. Cross 2019. "Methodological Ambiguity and Inconsistency Constrain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as A Silver Bullet for Monitoring Ecological Restoration" Remote Sensing 11, no. 10: 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101180

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop