Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
SustainabilitySustainability
  • Correction
  • Open Access

21 June 2017

Correction: Hansen, A., et al. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028

,
,
and
1
Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max–Eyth–Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
2
Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
(1)
In the manuscript, the following text above Figure 2 should be replaced:
“[…] CUDe of 63.4% (CUDe = 2% + 32.4% + 29.0%; Boundary II in Figure 2).”
with
“[…] CUDe of 63.3% (CUDe = 2% + 32.4% + 28.9%; Boundary II in Figure 1).”
(2)
Figure 1 and Figure 2 should be replaced:
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g001
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g002
with
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g003
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g004
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The change does not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage.

Reference

  1. Hansen, A.; Budde, J.; Karatay, Y.N.; Prochnow, A. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.