Next Article in Journal
Analysis of China’s Carbon Emissions Base on Carbon Flow in Four Main Sectors: 2000–2013
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Dynamics of Reclaimed Coal Mine Soil under Agricultural Use: A Chronosequence Study in the Dongtan Mining Area, Shandong Province, China
Open AccessArticle

Expert Evaluation of Subsidies for the Management of Fragmented Private Forest in Regards to National Biodiversity Goals—The Case of Kochi Prefecture, Japan

School of Economics & Management, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi 780-8515, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Barry Brook
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 626; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040626
Received: 31 January 2017 / Revised: 11 April 2017 / Accepted: 12 April 2017 / Published: 17 April 2017
This paper presents an expert evaluation of the subsidy scheme for private forest plantations in Kami City, Kochi Prefecture, Japan, to determine whether the twelve currently available subsidies are designed to realize national biodiversity goals. Subsidies for forestry practices are often criticized for rarely achieving planned outcomes and for environmental threats. Threats to natural balance of private forest have been observed in Kochi Prefecture, suggesting that current forestry subsidies may not be achieving national objectives. The utilization objectives, type of management, requirements, area, intensity, and subsidy rates were contrasted to the three forest multifunctionality objectives of the National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan (NBSJ) 2012–2020, to identify subsidy weaknesses. Focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted in the study site, as well as Bavaria, Germany and Steiermark, Austria, to get a big picture of how experts in these comparable management areas evaluate the Kochi subsidy scheme. Analyses were performed based on a combination of framework analysis and constant comparison analysis. It was found that realization of vertical multifunctionality is hindered due to lack of site-specific management. A six-point proposal for restructuring the subsidy scheme, leaned on results, and the Bavarian subsidy scheme was made. To improve vertical multi-functionality, subsidy schemes should focus on forest owner integration and site-specific, long-term oriented forest works. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable forest management; harmful subsidies; small-scale forestry; focus group; multifunctional forestry; integrated forestry; Japan; Kochi Prefecture sustainable forest management; harmful subsidies; small-scale forestry; focus group; multifunctional forestry; integrated forestry; Japan; Kochi Prefecture
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gain, D.; Watanabe, T. Expert Evaluation of Subsidies for the Management of Fragmented Private Forest in Regards to National Biodiversity Goals—The Case of Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Sustainability 2017, 9, 626.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop