Next Article in Journal
Mortality Associated with High Ambient Temperatures, Heatwaves, and the Urban Heat Island in Athens, Greece
Next Article in Special Issue
Industrial Symbiosis in the Upper Valley: A Study of the Casella-Hypertherm Recycling Partnership
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Residents’ Preferences of the Land Use Program Surrounding Forest Park, Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long Distance Trade, Locational Dynamics and By-Product Development: Insights from the History of the American Cottonseed Industry

Life and Death of Industrial Ecosystems

Stuart School of Business, Illinois Institute of Technology, 10 West 35th Street, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
Institute for Environmental Science and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2121 West Taylor Street (MC 673), Chicago, IL 60612-4224, USA
Department of Physics, University of Buffalo, Fronczak Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260-1500, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 605;
Received: 9 February 2017 / Revised: 23 March 2017 / Accepted: 7 April 2017 / Published: 13 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diverse Dynamics of Industrial Symbiosis: Emergence and Development)
Self-organized industrial ecosystems (SOIEs) refer to communities of firms in diverse industries that spontaneously engage in Industrial Symbiosis (IS); that is, firms independently develop bilateral and multi-lateral interactions involving material, energy, and knowledge sharing for individual and collective benefit. Like biological ecosystems, self-organized industrial ecosystems must constantly respond to external perturbations. Resilience of SOIEs, or the ability of systems to maintain structure and function in response to perturbations, has been the focus of a few recent studies. However, these studies have only examined the network characteristics for resilience of IS in a static manner. The current study contributes to this emerging literature by examining the dynamics associated with growth (life) and demise (death) of self-organized industrial ecosystems in light of changing network dynamics and external perturbations, with emphasis on material and socio-economic aspects of connectivity between firms. This research is grounded in real world cases, but expands beyond these through hypothetical network models in order to ascertain the network characteristics that lead to more resilient structures and outcomes. A key distinction is made between SOIEs that include an anchor firm versus scavenger firms. The former typically involve a scale-free network structure where new member firms preferentially connect to actors with the most connections, while the latter involve more random, fully-connected networks where new member firms connect with multiple existing actors. The results imply that resilience of SOIEs do not arise from intrinsic properties of the system alone, but from the interplay of network topology with external social and ecological constraints. View Full-Text
Keywords: industrial symbiosis; resilience; sustainability, network dynamics industrial symbiosis; resilience; sustainability, network dynamics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ashton, W.S.; Chopra, S.S.; Kashyap, A.R. Life and Death of Industrial Ecosystems. Sustainability 2017, 9, 605.

AMA Style

Ashton WS, Chopra SS, Kashyap AR. Life and Death of Industrial Ecosystems. Sustainability. 2017; 9(4):605.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ashton, Weslynne S., Shauhrat S. Chopra, and And Rahul Kashyap. 2017. "Life and Death of Industrial Ecosystems" Sustainability 9, no. 4: 605.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop