Next Article in Journal
The Study on Biomass Fraction Estimation for Waste Incinerated in Korea: A Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphical Methodology of Global Pollution Index for the Environmental Impact Assessment Using Two Environmental Components
Previous Article in Journal
Projections of Future Land Use in Bangladesh under the Background of Baseline, Ecological Protection and Economic Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Urban Resilience: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability in Iasi City (Romania)
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 509;

Renewable Energy Project as a Source of Innovation in Rural Communities: Lessons from the Periphery

Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Geography, Clinicilor street, 5-7, Cluj-Napoca 400006, Romania
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Francesco Asdrubali
Received: 16 January 2017 / Revised: 12 March 2017 / Accepted: 22 March 2017 / Published: 28 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilience to Natural and Man-Made Disasters)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1592 KB, uploaded 28 March 2017]   |  


Renewable energy projects (REPs) are viewed as a resource for the development of rural, peripheral communities. Going beyond the simplistic understanding of renewable energy technology as an independent variable, the current study looks into what the interaction between renewables and host communities brings in terms of innovation and development. Relying on a combination of primary and secondary data, both qualitative and quantitative, we observed that for the case of northwest Romania the fast development of REPs had no impact on classic economic indicators such as employment or revenue to the local budget. Looking closely at the impact on innovation as an important explanatory factor of peripheralization, in the majority of researched cases we saw no technical nor policy-related innovation associated with REPs. The presence of a privately-owned project in the territory of the community acted as a possible catalyst for considering developing their own REPs however. Owning a renewable energy project at the same time proved to have a positive impact on policy-related innovation. Moreover, communities that developed and manage their own REPs seem also to be more interested in changing the existing technological arrangements as well. View Full-Text
Keywords: renewable energy projects; peripheralization; innovation; development renewable energy projects; peripheralization; innovation; development

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cebotari, S.; Benedek, J. Renewable Energy Project as a Source of Innovation in Rural Communities: Lessons from the Periphery. Sustainability 2017, 9, 509.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top