Next Article in Journal
Decomposition and Attribution Analysis of Industrial Carbon Intensity Changes in Xinjiang, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Pollutants and Microbial Communities Obtained in Simulated Lysimeters of Swine Carcasses
Previous Article in Journal
A Carbon Emission Evaluation for an Integrated Logistics System—A Case Study of the Port of Shenzhen
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management of Animal Carcass Disposal Sites Using a Biochar Permeable Reactive Barrier and Fast Growth Tree (Populus euramericana): A Field Study in Korea
Open AccessArticle

Political Response to Foot-and-Mouth Disease: A Review of Korean News

Department of Economics, College of Economics and Business Administration, Hannam University, Daejeon 34430, Korea
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Hannam University, Daejeon 34430, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2017, 9(3), 463;
Received: 9 November 2016 / Revised: 11 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published: 20 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Management of Post-Epidemic Mass Carcasses Burial Sites)
The 2010/2011 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in Korea produced about 4500 burial sites for 3.5 million animal carcasses, which can be summarized as quick, mass burials, at or near the outbreak farms. An FMD outbreak has occurred nearly every year since the big outbreak, although the sizes of these outbreaks have been small. This article presents the rationale behind government policies for FMD outbreaks and disposal sites, the secrecy of the government administration and the neglect of scientific data. We compared government news announcements with news from the non-governmental sector by analyzing all the news for FMD and disposal sites from 29 October 2010, the first day of the big outbreak to August 2016. We found that the Korean response to the FMD outbreak originated from political purposes. We present four rationales for our arguments including: (1) a military collision between North and South of Korea; (2) the reformation of four big rivers; (3) the incident at the Fukushima Atomic Energy Plant of Japan; and (4) the national elections. We believe that the next response should be based on scientific data and proof, and also from the environmental perspective, not the political or industry perspective. View Full-Text
Keywords: foot-and-mouth disease; FMD; disposal site; Korea; political response; news review foot-and-mouth disease; FMD; disposal site; Korea; political response; news review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ko, C.-R.; Seol, S.-S.; Kim, G. Political Response to Foot-and-Mouth Disease: A Review of Korean News. Sustainability 2017, 9, 463.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop