Next Article in Journal
Environmental Performance and Financing Decisions Impact on Sustainable Financial Development of Chinese Environmental Protection Enterprises
Previous Article in Journal
Effective Disclosure in the Fast-Fashion Industry: from Sustainability Reporting to Action
Open AccessArticle

Quantitative Analyses of Transition Pension Liabilities and Solvency Sustainability in China

School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(12), 2252; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122252
Received: 17 October 2017 / Revised: 19 November 2017 / Accepted: 2 December 2017 / Published: 6 December 2017
In the context of the aging population, the debt risk and solvency situation of China’s pension plan are of major concern for government and individuals. The aim of this paper is to project public pension liabilities and evaluate the solvency sustainability of China’s pension reform during transition periods. By using cohort component and actuarial models, transition debt and solvency sustainability are projected under the existing policy scenario and several sets of hypothetical policy scenarios. We find that the transition liabilities will peak in 2035 and the pension plan will become unsustainable in 2048 under existing policies. In the proposed scenario, postponing retirement age helps to maintain pension plan sustainability until 2083, but this option can’t solve the financial distress in the long run. Further, the transition pension debt will double in the peak moment if the retirement age is postponed for five years, which would pose a risk to the liquidity of the fund. Moreover, an increase to invest return can only improve the baseline solvency in short term. Sustainable options should be designed as composite reform measures, including retirement and investment adjustment. View Full-Text
Keywords: pension liabilities; solvency sustainability; scenario analysis; reform options pension liabilities; solvency sustainability; scenario analysis; reform options
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Bai, M.; Liu, Y.; Hao, J. Quantitative Analyses of Transition Pension Liabilities and Solvency Sustainability in China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2252.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop