Next Article in Journal
Impact of China’s Recycling Subsidy Policy in the Product Life Cycle
Next Article in Special Issue
Underground Potential for Urban Sustainability: Mapping Resources and Their Interactions with the Deep City Method
Previous Article in Journal
Farmers’ Risk Perception towards Climate Change: A Case of the GAP-Şanlıurfa Region, Turkey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rural–Urban Linkages and Sustainable Regional Development: The Role of Entrepreneurs in Linking Peripheries and Centers
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Coping with Migration-Induced Urban Growth: Addressing the Blind Spot of UN Habitat

Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CCRS) at the University of Zurich, Zähringerstrasse 24, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Academic Editor: Tan Yigitcanlar
Sustainability 2016, 8(8), 800;
Received: 19 June 2016 / Revised: 4 August 2016 / Accepted: 8 August 2016 / Published: 16 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Contextual and Dynamic Understanding of Sustainable Urbanisation)
PDF [386 KB, uploaded 16 August 2016]


The demography of cities in the 21st century will be shaped, to a large extent, by migration. This paper argues that the rights-based approach to urban policy advocated in the preparatory work of Habitat III, the UN Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development to be held in October 2016 in Quito, Ecuador, may not be conducive to this goal. The approach lacks a contextual and dynamic understanding of urbanization. It implicitly assumes that a growing and expansive urban economy would primarily benefit the rich and harm the poor. The resulting containment policies to stop “urban sprawl” and defend “the right to the city” can, however, be counterproductive if adopted in cities in less developed countries (LDCs) that grow fast due to internal migration. Attempts to limit urban growth may merely lead to more informal settlements, less affordable housing, and increasing costs of doing business. In other words, it may benefit the rich and harm the poor. LDCs should, therefore, refrain from adopting defensive urban policies mostly advocated by more developed countries (MDCs) and, instead, plan for sustainable urban expansion designed to improve access to essential urban services and to create a level playing field for newcomers in business. In this context, urban policies may build upon the basic insights of the late urbanist Jane Jacobs. She recognized that the vital function of cities is to provide affordable infrastructure and an institutional environment that enable migrants and other marginal urban communities to contribute to urban prosperity and problem-solving with their skills, networks, and entrepreneurial minds. The resulting social and economic empowerment increases access to essential human rights and ensures that cities become more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable. View Full-Text
Keywords: migration; urbanization; entrepreneurship; innovation; urban expansion; Jane Jacobs migration; urbanization; entrepreneurship; innovation; urban expansion; Jane Jacobs

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Aerni, P. Coping with Migration-Induced Urban Growth: Addressing the Blind Spot of UN Habitat. Sustainability 2016, 8, 800.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top