Next Article in Journal
Designing Sustainable Public Transportation: Integrated Optimization of Bus Speed and Holding Time in a Connected Vehicle Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbon Emission Mitigation Potentials of Different Policy Scenarios and Their Effects on International Aviation in the Korean Context
Previous Article in Journal
Marketing Green Fertilizers: Insights into Consumer Preferences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimating Air Particulate Matter Using MODIS Data and Analyzing Its Spatial and Temporal Pattern over the Yangtze Delta Region
Open AccessArticle

Productivity Growth-Accounting for Undesirable Outputs and Its Influencing Factors: The Case of China

1
School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2
Experimental School, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Daniel A. Vallero
Sustainability 2016, 8(11), 1166; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111166
Received: 24 May 2016 / Revised: 28 October 2016 / Accepted: 1 November 2016 / Published: 11 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution Monitoring and Sustainable Development)
Presently, China’s social development is facing the dilemma of supporting economic growth and reducing emissions. Therefore, it is crucial to analyse productivity growth and examine its relationship with influencing factors in China. This study evaluated the total factor productivity (TFP) growth of 30 provinces in China by adopting the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) productivity index and incorporating undesirable outputs from 2011–2014. Then, a Tobit regression model was employed to explore the factors that influence China’s TFP growth. The results show that the average annual growth of the Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index was lower than that of the traditional Malmquist (M) productivity index growth during the research period. The findings reveal several key conclusions: First, the true TFP growth in China will be overestimated if undesirable outputs are ignored. Second, technical changes are the main contributor to TFP growth. Third, there are huge regional disparities of productivity growth in China. Fourth, coal intensity, environmental regulations, and industrial structure have significantly negative effects on productivity growth, while real per capita gross domestic product (GDP) and foreign direct investment (FDI) have strongly positive effects on productivity growth. View Full-Text
Keywords: total factor productivity (TFP); Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index; undesirable outputs; Tobit Model total factor productivity (TFP); Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index; undesirable outputs; Tobit Model
MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Fang, H.; Peng, B.; Wang, X.; Fang, S. Productivity Growth-Accounting for Undesirable Outputs and Its Influencing Factors: The Case of China. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1166.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop