Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Evaluation of GPM IMERG Satellite Rainfall Data Across Multiple Temporal and Spatial Scales for Sustainable Flood Risk Management in East Java, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of a Regionally Optimized Newmark Model for Coseismic Landslide Hazard Assessment in Southwest China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Economic Benefits of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in the Building Sector

1
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
CHN Energy Hydrogen Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(9), 4551; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094551
Submission received: 11 March 2026 / Revised: 25 April 2026 / Accepted: 30 April 2026 / Published: 5 May 2026

Abstract

The transition to a low-carbon building sector will be greatly aided by hydrogen fuel cells. This paper examines their carbon emission reduction and economic advantages via Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH), alongside multiple carbon pricing scenarios. When using coal-produced hydrogen as a hydrogen source, hydrogen fuel cell applications have no carbon reduction effect. When hydrogen production from natural gas steam reforming is employed, the carbon reduction per unit of hydrogen in the HFC-CHP system ranges from 2.34 to 4.07 kgCO2e, with a hydrogen cost per unit between 24.32 and 37.78 RMB/kg. When using blue hydrogen, the carbon reduction increases to 4.70–9.08 kgCO2e, with costs ranging from 22.86 to 39.97 RMB/kg. Green hydrogen achieves the highest carbon reduction of up to 10.99 kgCO2e, but costs rise to 47.51 RMB/kg under this pathway. The results revealed that pipeline transport outperforms trailer transport in carbon reduction and economic efficiency at the same distance. Simultaneously, solely incorporating the carbon market as a hydrogen subsidy measure is insufficient to close the cost disparity between hydrogen fuel cell energy supply and traditional energy supply methods. More types of subsidy measures are needed to enhance the competitiveness of hydrogen energy.
Keywords: hydrogen; hydrogen fuel cells; life cycle; levelized cost of hydrogen; carbon-emission reduction; building sector; economic feasibility; policy support hydrogen; hydrogen fuel cells; life cycle; levelized cost of hydrogen; carbon-emission reduction; building sector; economic feasibility; policy support

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, R.; Xing, Y.; Wu, W.; Wang, Z. Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Economic Benefits of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in the Building Sector. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094551

AMA Style

Zhang R, Xing Y, Wu W, Wang Z. Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Economic Benefits of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in the Building Sector. Sustainability. 2026; 18(9):4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ruxue, Ying Xing, Wenhao Wu, and Zhen Wang. 2026. "Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Economic Benefits of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in the Building Sector" Sustainability 18, no. 9: 4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094551

APA Style

Zhang, R., Xing, Y., Wu, W., & Wang, Z. (2026). Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Economic Benefits of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in the Building Sector. Sustainability, 18(9), 4551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094551

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop