Next Article in Journal
A Two-Timescale Typology of Neighborhood-Scale Commercial Districts in Seoul: Evidence from Mobile Phone De Facto Population Data
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Coastal Safety: Hydrodynamic Modeling of Drowning Risk Zones at Ras El-Bar, Nile Delta, Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Environmental Policy Stringency and Carbon Dioxide Emission: Asymmetric Causality Analysis

by
İsmail Ciğerci
,
Pınar Bengi Kaya
,
Neslihan Karakuş Büyükben
and
Merve Malak
*
Department of Public Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200 Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(9), 4325; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094325
Submission received: 24 February 2026 / Revised: 8 April 2026 / Accepted: 20 April 2026 / Published: 27 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)

Abstract

The effectiveness of policy tools used to combat global environmental degradation and climate change is gaining importance. The role of environmental policies in reducing carbon dioxide emissions and whether rising emissions levels lead to tightening of environmental policies are the main research questions of this study. Using panel causality methods, this study examines the relationship between the Environmental Policy Stringency Index (EPS) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions across 23 OECD countries from 1991 to 2020. The results of the Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel causality test show bidirectional causality between EPS and CO2. According to the asymmetric causality test, we find causality from EPS to CO2 during positive shocks. Furthermore, when examining negative shocks, we report a unidirectional causality originating only from EPS in the US. Our results demonstrate that the bidirectional relationship between EPS and CO2 can contribute to the development of effective and balanced environmental policies if policymakers and society consider this interaction.
Keywords: environmental policy stringency index; carbon dioxide emissions; asymmetric causality tests environmental policy stringency index; carbon dioxide emissions; asymmetric causality tests

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciğerci, İ.; Kaya, P.B.; Karakuş Büyükben, N.; Malak, M. Environmental Policy Stringency and Carbon Dioxide Emission: Asymmetric Causality Analysis. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094325

AMA Style

Ciğerci İ, Kaya PB, Karakuş Büyükben N, Malak M. Environmental Policy Stringency and Carbon Dioxide Emission: Asymmetric Causality Analysis. Sustainability. 2026; 18(9):4325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ciğerci, İsmail, Pınar Bengi Kaya, Neslihan Karakuş Büyükben, and Merve Malak. 2026. "Environmental Policy Stringency and Carbon Dioxide Emission: Asymmetric Causality Analysis" Sustainability 18, no. 9: 4325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094325

APA Style

Ciğerci, İ., Kaya, P. B., Karakuş Büyükben, N., & Malak, M. (2026). Environmental Policy Stringency and Carbon Dioxide Emission: Asymmetric Causality Analysis. Sustainability, 18(9), 4325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop