Next Article in Journal
Building Skills for a Sustainable Future: The Erasmus+ CBHE GreenTraINT Experience in Seychelles
Previous Article in Journal
From Disruption to Digital Transformation: The COVID-19 Shock and Digital Payment Adoption in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pilot Zones for Innovative Application of Artificial Intelligence and Enterprise Innovation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide

by
Oksana Liashenko
1,2,*,
Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi
3,4,*,
Olena Mykhailovska
5,
Dariusz Woźniak
6,
Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed
4 and
Ihor Ruzhytskyi
7
1
Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine
2
Loughborough Business School, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
3
Faculty of Economics and Management, West Ukrainian National University, 46020 Ternopil, Ukraine
4
Institute of Public Administration and Business, WSEI University, 20-209 Lublin, Poland
5
Research and Educational Innovation Centre of Social Transformations, 14032 Chernihiv, Ukraine
6
School of Business, National-Louis University, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland
7
Private Postgraduate Educational Institution “Institute of Professional Transformations”, 02095 Kyiv, Ukraine
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(8), 3921; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083921
Submission received: 6 March 2026 / Revised: 8 April 2026 / Accepted: 13 April 2026 / Published: 15 April 2026

Abstract

Digital government is widely regarded as a catalyst for sustainable development, yet the mechanisms by which e-government adoption translates into progress on the SDGs remain poorly understood, particularly in high-income contexts where governance is already mature. This study addresses that gap using a balanced panel of all 27 EU member states over 2015–2023. Applying two-way fixed-effects estimation with formal Baron–Kenny mediation and country-block bootstrap inference, we identify three findings that collectively reframe the relationship between digital government and sustainable development in the European context. First, the widely assumed governance reform pathway is not empirically supported in the EU27: e-government adoption is not associated with measurable improvement in institutional quality, consistent with structural saturation rather than policy failure. Second, the benefits of digital government are unevenly distributed across the EU: old member states (EU15) exhibit significant positive effects on SDG 9: Innovation and Infrastructure, whereas new member states (EU13) do not, challenging the assumption that digital strategies yield symmetric returns across the Union. Third, and most importantly, the EU15 effect appears to be fully channelled through household internet access, consistent with a digital co-investment mechanism in which e-government uptake and broadband infrastructure co-evolve as expressions of a shared national digital transformation strategy. These findings inform the policy debate: the question for EU15 is not whether to invest in e-government, but how to sustain the joint infrastructure investment that makes it effective; for EU13, the priority is to establish the digital and institutional foundations that enable the mechanism to be activated.
Keywords: e-government; sustainable development goals; two-way fixed effects; mediation analysis; institutional complementarity; digital co-investment; EU15; EU13; SDG 9 e-government; sustainable development goals; two-way fixed effects; mediation analysis; institutional complementarity; digital co-investment; EU15; EU13; SDG 9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liashenko, O.; Dluhopolskyi, O.; Mykhailovska, O.; Woźniak, D.; Skrzypek-Ahmed, S.; Ruzhytskyi, I. Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083921

AMA Style

Liashenko O, Dluhopolskyi O, Mykhailovska O, Woźniak D, Skrzypek-Ahmed S, Ruzhytskyi I. Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide. Sustainability. 2026; 18(8):3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liashenko, Oksana, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Olena Mykhailovska, Dariusz Woźniak, Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed, and Ihor Ruzhytskyi. 2026. "Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide" Sustainability 18, no. 8: 3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083921

APA Style

Liashenko, O., Dluhopolskyi, O., Mykhailovska, O., Woźniak, D., Skrzypek-Ahmed, S., & Ruzhytskyi, I. (2026). Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide. Sustainability, 18(8), 3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083921

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop