Next Article in Journal
How Digital Literacy Nonlinearly Moderates the Impact of Green Information Load on Green Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Information Credibility
Previous Article in Journal
Barriers and Socio-Economic Drivers of Renewable Energy Adoption Among Manufacturing SMEs: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability and Agricultural Investments in Bulgaria: Balancing Profitability and Environmental Protection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Agrifood Efficiency: DEA Evidence for Rural Competitiveness in Bulgaria

1
Department of Natural Resource Economics, Business Faculty, University of National and World Economy (UNWE), Student Town, 8th December Street 19, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Marketing and Strategic Planning, Management and Administration Faculty, University of National and World Economy (UNWE), 8th December Street 19, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(8), 3810; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083810
Submission received: 22 March 2026 / Revised: 6 April 2026 / Accepted: 8 April 2026 / Published: 11 April 2026

Abstract

This study evaluates the productive efficiency in the agrifood sector of 21 rural Bulgarian districts as a proxy for territorial competitiveness. Output-oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was performed using district-level data from 2022 to 2024. The analysis incorporates five inputs related to labor, land, and capital and three economic outputs from agriculture and food processing. Results indicate substantial variation in efficiency among rural districts. Twelve districts form the efficiency frontier, with effective resource use and diverse structures; nine are inefficient due to scale or organizational/technological constraints. Bootstrap bias correction revealed standard DEA underestimates efficiency gaps. Frontier districts include large plains, mountainous regions and smaller, specialized systems, indicating diverse paths to competitiveness. A composite Territorial Competitiveness Index (TCI) showed frontier status does not guarantee efficiency, often due to underused manufacturing capital. Cluster analysis identified four performance groups needing different policy support, ranging from near-frontier territories that need knowledge transfer to deeply underperforming districts that require restructuring. No geographic clustering of efficiency was found, pointing to structural and institutional, rather than geographic, drivers. These results highlight the need for territorially tailored rural policies within the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and offer an empirical basis for diagnosing regional agrifood efficiency gaps.
Keywords: sustainable rural development; agrifood efficiency; Data Envelopment Analysis; bootstrap DEA; Territorial Competitiveness Index; OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) rural typology sustainable rural development; agrifood efficiency; Data Envelopment Analysis; bootstrap DEA; Territorial Competitiveness Index; OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) rural typology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peneva, M.; Bankova, Y. Agrifood Efficiency: DEA Evidence for Rural Competitiveness in Bulgaria. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083810

AMA Style

Peneva M, Bankova Y. Agrifood Efficiency: DEA Evidence for Rural Competitiveness in Bulgaria. Sustainability. 2026; 18(8):3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083810

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peneva, Mariya, and Yovka Bankova. 2026. "Agrifood Efficiency: DEA Evidence for Rural Competitiveness in Bulgaria" Sustainability 18, no. 8: 3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083810

APA Style

Peneva, M., & Bankova, Y. (2026). Agrifood Efficiency: DEA Evidence for Rural Competitiveness in Bulgaria. Sustainability, 18(8), 3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083810

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop